Blog

  • Motorola Edge 70 Pro — premiere, specifications, and price

    Motorola Edge 70 Pro — premiere, specifications, and price

    The premiere of Motorola Edge 70 Pro is scheduled for April 22, 2026, and the first units are expected to hit Polish stores most likely on May 14, 2026. The mid-range flagship features a 6.8-inch Extreme AMOLED 144 Hz display with a brightness of 5200 nits, a MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Extreme processor, a main camera of 50 MP Sony Lytia 710, and a 6500 mAh battery with 90 W charging. All enclosed in a case with IP68, IP69, and MIL-STD-810H certifications.

    Motorola is learning from the Edge 60 Pro. A larger battery, brighter screen, stronger chip, and bolder design (marble, satin, fabric) — all under Pantone. The European price of €649–699 (around 2,900–3,100 PLN) positions the model exactly where Galaxy A57, Xiaomi 15T, and Nothing Phone 3a Pro compete. Does Motorola have what it takes to win? We break down the leaks and confirmed facts into their components.

    When is the Motorola Edge 70 Pro premiere

    Global premiere of Motorola Edge 70 Pro takes place on April 22, 2026, in India, as confirmed by Flipkart in pre-sale. The Polish distribution starts according to information from purepc.pl on May 14, 2026 — that’s when the first orders will be shipped from x-kom, Media Expert, Komputronik, and RTV Euro AGD.

    This is standard practice for Motorola for the Edge series. Its predecessor, Motorola Edge 60 Pro, debuted in April 2025 and was available in Polish stores from May of the same year at a price of 2499 PLN. Edge 70 Pro will follow this pattern, although the price may be slightly higher due to better components.

    Note: Global dates announced by Motorola may differ from Polish ones. The official Motorola EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa) conference is expected at the turn of April and May 2026. Until then, details about the Polish price and availability are estimates.

    Motorola is preparing launch promotions. The company traditionally adds a selected gadget at the start: for the Edge 60 series, it was the Moto Buds 2 Loop headphones, for Edge 70 Pro we expect the Moto Watch 70 smartwatch or a TurboPower 90 W charger with USB-C to USB-C cable. Details will be confirmed at the press conference in May.

    Specyfikacja Motorola Edge 70 Pro, co już wiemy oficjalnie

    Poniżej pełna lista potwierdzonych parametrów (część z oficjalnych grafik Motoroli opublikowanych przed premierą) oraz przecieków z portali PhoneArena, gsmmaniak.pl i telepolis.pl.

    ParametrMotorola Edge 70 Pro
    Wyświetlacz6,8″ Extreme AMOLED, quad curved
    Rozdzielczość2712 × 1220 px (1,5K Super HD)
    Odświeżanie144 Hz
    Jasność (peak)5200 nitów
    Ochrona ekranuCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
    ProcesorMediaTek Dimensity 8500 Extreme, 3,40 GHz
    GPUMali-G720 MC8
    RAM12 GB LPDDR5X
    Pamięćdo 512 GB
    Aparat główny50 MP, Sony Lytia 710, OIS
    Ultraszeroki50 MP
    Teleobiektyw3,5× zoom optyczny (przeciek)
    Sensor multispektralnyTak, 3-w-1
    Selfie50 MP
    Wideo4K 60 fps na każdym module
    Bateria6500 mAh
    Ładowanie przewodowe90 W (TurboPower)
    Ładowanie bezprzewodowe15 W (spodziewane)
    WodoszczelnośćIP68 + IP69
    WytrzymałośćMIL-STD-810H
    ChłodzenieKomora parowa 4600 mm²
    AudioDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio
    SystemAndroid 16
    Wsparcie3 lata aktualizacji Androida, 5 lat łatek
    KoloryPantone Lily White, Tea, Titan
    Cena EU (spodziewana)€649–699 (2 900–3 100 zł)
    Cena IndieRs. 36 999+
    Premiera22.04.2026 (Indie), 14.05.2026 (PL)

    The biggest upgrades compared to the Edge 60 Pro are battery (6500 mAh vs 6000 mAh), screen brightness (5200 vs 4500 nits), and refresh rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). The camera remains at a similar level with the same Sony sensor (now Lytia 710 instead of 700C).

    Motorola Edge 70 Pro — Extreme AMOLED display 5200 nits

    The Motorola Edge 70 Pro gets one of the brightest screens in the mid-range segment. The peak brightness of 5200 nits is a value that today only competes with Xiaomi 15T Pro (4500 nits) and Honor Magic 7 Lite (5000 nits) at this price. In comparison, the iPhone 17 has 3000 nits peak, and the Samsung Galaxy A57 — 1900 nits.

    In practice, this means readability in full sunlight without squinting, even on the beach or in a convertible car. The refresh rate of 144 Hz is an advantage for gamers and those using dynamic applications. The difference between 120 and 144 Hz in everyday scrolling is subtle, but noticeable in games like Call of Duty Mobile or Genshin Impact.

    The screen is quad curved — curved on all four edges. It’s an impressive but controversial design: accidental touches are more likely, and the full-screen tempered glass is harder to fit. If you’re planning to buy, prepare to invest in UV glass or hydrogel film that will cover the curves.

    It’s worth immediately choosing a case and glass for the new Edge 70 — check accessories for Motorola Edge 70 at homescreen.pl

    Sony Lytia 710 camera, telephoto lens, and multispectral sensor

    The heart of photography in the Motorola Edge 70 Pro is the 50-megapixel Sony Lytia 710 sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS). This is an improved version of the sensor from the Edge 60 Pro (Lytia 700C), with higher sensitivity and better noise reduction in low light. The lens has a brightness of f/1.8.

    The rear set is complemented by two additional modules: a 50 MP ultra-wide (field of view 120°, useful for landscapes and architecture) and a telephoto lens with 3.5× optical zoom. The latter has an interesting focal length — close to the classic 85 mm used in portraits, but far enough to cut out detail from the background.

    What the 3-in-1 multispectral sensor offers

    The new feature compared to the Edge 60 Pro is the additional 3-in-1 multispectral sensor. This component does not take pictures but collects information about light in three spectral ranges: visible, infrared, and UV. As a result, the phone better maps colors and accurately reproduces skin tones, fabrics, and plants — areas where smartphones traditionally struggle.

    The effect is noticeable in two scenarios:

    • Portraits under artificial light (office, restaurant, shopping mall), where fluorescence tints the skin green or yellow
    • Culinary photography, where traditional white balance washes out the colors of the dishes

    The 50 MP front selfie camera supports 4K recording at 60 fps — a specification that just two years ago was reserved for flagship models costing 5000 PLN. Perfect for vloggers and those creating content for TikTok or YouTube Shorts.

    Motorola Edge 70 Pro Battery — 6500 mAh and 90 W charging

    The biggest practical change in the Motorola Edge 70 Pro is the 6500 mAh battery. That’s 500 mAh more than in the Edge 60 Pro (6000 mAh) and 25% more than in the Samsung Galaxy S25 (5000 mAh). Motorola claims over two days of usage on a single charge with typical use.

    In real terms, this means:

    • 16-18 hours of screen on time (SOT) while scrolling social media and watching videos
    • Weekend without a charger — a trip from Friday to Sunday without searching for a socket
    • 10-12 hours of gaming in games like Genshin Impact or PUBG Mobile

    Charging with 90 W TurboPower will charge the phone from 0 to 100% in about 35-40 minutes (confirmed parameters similar to Edge 60 Pro). Wireless charging is expected to be around 15 W — an unofficial value, but predicted based on the predecessor. For inductive charging, it’s worth looking at wireless chargers and docking stations.

    It is worth remembering that the Motorola package does not include a 90 W charger — you have to buy it separately. If you don’t have a GaN charger yet, now is a good time to invest in a universal USB-C Power Delivery unit. Check out our category of network chargers at homescreen.pl — the Baseus GaN5 Pro and Anker 737 models support 100 W and can also charge a laptop. A good power bank with PD will also come in handy on trips — 20,000 mAh will recharge the Edge 70 Pro three times.

    Tip: The 6500 mAh battery in an 8 mm thick casing was made possible only by the new silicon-carbon cells with higher energy density. This is the same technology that powers the Oppo Find X8 Pro and Honor Magic 7 Pro. In practice: longer lifespan and less degradation after 500 charging cycles.

    Pantone design, marble and fabric instead of plastic

    Motorola consistently embraces bold design. The Motorola Edge 70 Pro comes in three color variants curated by Pantone:

    • Pantone Lily White — white with marble texture (replicates the pattern of natural stone)
    • Tea — warm beige with a satin finish (matte, resistant to fingerprints)
    • Titan — graphite with fabric texture (new — tactile finish, slightly rough to the touch)

    Three different textures instead of one glass on the back is the direction Motorola has been heading for several years. Previous Edge series had versions with eco-leather, vegan velvet, and wood. The marble texture in the Edge 70 Pro is the first in the industry — no one has used this effect in a mass series before.

    Practical consequence: each texture reacts differently to everyday use. Marble and fabric are more resistant to minor scratches and fingerprints, but harder to clean. Satin is the most versatile, but collects micro-scratches.

    For all three versions, a case is a must-have investment — the manufacturer does not include a silicone cover in the box. A transparent case will show the unique texture, while a rugged one will protect the phone from drops. It’s also worth getting tempered glass for curved screens right away, as standard flat glass will not cover the edges of the quad curved.

    Motorola Edge 70 Pro vs Edge 60 Pro, what has changed

    The predecessor is currently available in Polish stores at a price of 1,999–2,099 zł (after seasonal promotions). A comparison of key differences shows whether it is worth paying extra for the newer generation.

    ParameterMotorola Edge 70 ProMotorola Edge 60 Pro
    ProcessorDimensity 8500 ExtremeDimensity 8350
    Geekbench performance (multi)65635840
    Screen6.8″ AMOLED 144 Hz6.7″ pOLED 120 Hz
    Peak brightness5200 nits4500 nits
    Battery6500 mAh6000 mAh
    Wired charging90 W90 W
    Main camera50 MP Sony Lytia 71050 MP Sony Lytia 700C
    Telephoto3.5× with multispectral3× without multispectral
    Selfie50 MP50 MP
    DurabilityIP68 + IP69 + MIL-STD-810HIP68 + IP69
    SystemAndroid 16 (3+5 years)Android 15 (3+4 years)
    Launch price PL~2,999 zł (est.)2,499 zł

    The most noticeable changes are a stronger processor (+12% multi-core), a brighter screen (+16%), and a larger battery (+8%). The camera received a better sensor, but in everyday use, the difference is subtle — mainly noticeable in low light and in portraits thanks to the multispectral sensor.

    Is it worth paying an extra 500 PLN for the newer model? If you want a phone for 3-4 years — yes, the longer support and better processor will pay off. If you’re looking for a basic, reliable phone for 2 years — the Edge 60 Pro on promotion (~1,999 PLN) still offers a great price-to-quality ratio.

    Motorola Edge 70 Pro vs competition in the mid-range

    The 2,500–3,000 PLN segment is the most competitive area in the market. The Edge 70 Pro enters a territory where four other mid-range flagships are already competing.

    ModelProcessorBatteryScreenMain CameraPrice PL
    Motorola Edge 70 ProDimensity 85006500 mAh6.8″ 144 Hz 5200 nit50 MP Lytia 710~2,999 PLN
    Samsung Galaxy A57Exynos 15805000 mAh6.7″ 120 Hz 1900 nit50 MP2,499 PLN
    Xiaomi 15TDimensity 8400 Ultra5500 mAh6.8″ 144 Hz 3200 nit50 MP Leica2,799 PLN
    Nothing Phone 3a ProSnapdragon 7s Gen 35000 mAh6.77″ 120 Hz 3000 nit50 MP periscope 3×2,399 PLN
    Honor 400 ProSnapdragon 8s Gen 35300 mAh6.78″ 120 Hz 5000 nit200 MP2,999 PLN

    Motorola wins in three key parameters: battery (6500 mAh — the most in the segment), screen brightness (5200 nits — on par with Honor 400 Pro) and durability (MIL-STD-810H — no one else has this at this price). It loses a bit in the camera to Xiaomi 15T (Leica) and Honor 400 Pro (200 MP).

    Who the Motorola Edge 70 Pro is the best choice for

    Travelers and active individuals — MIL-STD-810H + IP69 guarantees that the phone will survive a fall from a bike path, a dip in the sea, and office coffee disasters. Add a good case and hydrogel film from brands like 3mk, Spigen, or Tech-Protect, and the phone will last 3-4 years without a scratch.

    Screen demanding users — a brightness of 5200 nits is visible even at noon in the sun, which no competitor offers at this price. Ideal for those who spend a lot of time outdoors or in the car.

    Portrait and scenery photographers — multispectral sensor + Lytia 710 + 3.5× telephoto lens is the most versatile photo set in the segment. If natural skin tone and good portraits are important to you, Motorola does it better than Samsung and Nothing.

    Mobile gamers — the combination of 144 Hz + Dimensity 8500 + 4600 mm² vapor chamber provides stable 90-120 fps in Call of Duty and Genshin Impact. The Samsung Galaxy A57 with 60 fps in these titles falls short.

    What is missing before the premiere

    Three elements remain unconfirmed and may affect the final rating:

    • Exact price in Poland — Motorola will announce it only at the EMEA conference (end of April/May 2026). Estimates of 2,899–3,099 PLN are based on the predecessor and the euro exchange rate.
    • Availability of the 16 GB RAM variant — India receives two configurations (12/256 GB and 12/512 GB), but the variant with 16 GB RAM seen in some leaks has not been confirmed for Europe
    • Telephoto lens details — 3.5× optical zoom is a leak, not official data. Motorola may still change this specification between the Indian and European launches

    It is also important to ask about long-term software support. 3 years of Android updates is a good standard, but Samsung (7 years) and Google Pixel (7 years) offer significantly longer support — 2-4 years more. For those planning to use the phone for 5+ years, this may be a deciding factor.

    Our choice: If you are looking for a solid mid-range flagship with a record battery and bright screen — the Motorola Edge 70 Pro will be the best choice in its price range for 2026. But be sure to add a case and tempered glass right away. The quad curved AMOLED is beautiful but delicate.

    Summary, is it worth waiting for the Motorola Edge 70 Pro

    The Motorola Edge 70 Pro will hit the market on April 22, 2026, in India, and on May 14, 2026, in Poland, priced around 2,900–3,100 PLN. The upgrades compared to the Edge 60 Pro are evolutionary but significant: +500 mAh battery, +24 Hz refresh rate, +700 nits brightness, and a new Dimensity 8500 Extreme processor. Overall: a better phone in every dimension.

    The biggest asset remains durability combined with design. MIL-STD-810H in a Pantone case with marble is something you won’t find at Samsung or Xiaomi. For active people and those demanding durability — an obvious choice. For photographers — great, but the Xiaomi 15T with Leica will offer a slightly better photo set for a similar price.

    Check out accessories for Motorola Edge 70 today at homescreen.pl — cases, tempered glass, hydrogel films, and camera protection for the entire series.

    FAQ, frequently asked questions about Motorola Edge 70 Pro

    When is the release of Motorola Edge 70 Pro?

    The official release of Motorola Edge 70 Pro will take place on April 22, 2026, in India. In Poland, the phone will be available from May 14, 2026 — that’s when the first orders will start shipping from x-kom, Media Expert, and Komputronik. The EMEA conference with the Polish price is expected at the turn of April and May 2026.

    How much will Motorola Edge 70 Pro cost in Poland?

    The estimated price of Motorola Edge 70 Pro in Poland is 2,899–3,099 PLN for the 12/512 GB variant. The European price is €649–699, and the Indian price starts from Rs. 36,999. Official Polish prices will be announced by Motorola at the EMEA press conference. The predecessor Edge 60 Pro cost 2,499 PLN at launch.

    What battery does Motorola Edge 70 Pro have?

    Motorola Edge 70 Pro dostaje akumulator 6500 mAh — to o 500 mAh więcej niż w Edge 60 Pro i o 30% więcej niż w Samsung Galaxy A57. Ładowanie przewodowe działa z mocą 90 W TurboPower (od 0 do 100% w około 35-40 minut). Producent deklaruje ponad dwa dni pracy na jednym ładowaniu.

    Jaki procesor w Motorola Edge 70 Pro?

    Motorola Edge 70 Pro napędza MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Extreme z maksymalnym taktowaniem 3,40 GHz i procesorem graficznym Mali-G720 MC8. W Geekbench osiąga wyniki 1727 single-core i 6563 multi-core, co przekłada się na płynne granie w tytułach AAA na średnich i wysokich detalach.

    Jaki aparat w Motorola Edge 70 Pro?

    Aparat główny w Motorola Edge 70 Pro to 50 MP z sensorem Sony Lytia 710 i OIS. Dodatkowo dostaje ultraszeroki 50 MP (120°), teleobiektyw z zoomem optycznym 3,5× oraz dodatkowy sensor multispektralny 3-w-1 do wierniejszego oddania kolorów. Selfie 50 MP z nagrywaniem 4K 60 fps.

    Czy Motorola Edge 70 Pro jest wodoodporny?

    Tak, Motorola Edge 70 Pro ma podwójną certyfikację IP68 (ochrona przed zanurzeniem do 1,5 m) i IP69 (ochrona przed gorącą wodą pod ciśnieniem) oraz wojskową normę MIL-STD-810H (odporność na upadki, wstrząsy, ekstremalne temperatury). To jeden z najbardziej wytrzymałych flagowców średnich 2026 roku.

  • Huawei Watch Buds 2, premiere, specification and price of the smartwatch with headphones

    Huawei Watch Buds 2, premiere, specification and price of the smartwatch with headphones

    Huawei shows the second generation of the most unusual smartwatch on the market. Watch Buds 2 debuts on April 20, 2026, during the Huawei Pura event and combines a watch with a pair of TWS headphones hidden under the dial.

    Huawei Watch Buds 2 is a smartwatch with built-in wireless headphones, which will have its official premiere on April 20, 2026 during the Huawei Pura event. The device continues the idea from 2022, after a light press on the dial, the case opens, and inside are two miniature TWS headphones with active noise cancellation. The second generation is expected to bring a new chip, HarmonyOS NEXT, and a set of AI features.

    The first generation of Watch Buds cost 2299 zł in Poland and was available in only one color. Version 2 is expected to be lighter, thinner, and equipped with better sound, while also opening the segment of «hybrid» audio-smart devices. We check everything we already know before the premiere.

    Huawei Watch Buds 2, when the premiere and availability in Poland

    The manufacturer has confirmed the date of the official premiere, April 20, 2026. The presentation will take place as part of the global event Huawei dedicated to the new Pura 80 smartphone series, alongside which the second generation of Watch Buds will also debut. The first generation of Watch Buds reached the European market a few months after its debut in China, so we will probably see the second one in Poland in the second quarter of 2026.

    Global sales are set to begin within four to six weeks of the premiere. The Polish distribution of Huawei usually aligns with the rest of Europe, so June–July 2026 is a realistic availability date for the Watch Buds 2 with Polish trade partners. The first generation was available at Media Expert, x-kom, and the official Huawei store.

    Tip: If you plan to buy the Watch Buds 2 right after the premiere, it’s worth preparing a replacement strap and protective glass for the dial, as Huawei only provides them in the package for selected colors. You can find compatible accessories in the category watch straps.

    Specifications of Huawei Watch Buds 2, what we already know

    Huawei has not yet released the full specifications, but leaks and regulatory documents indicate specific changes compared to the first generation. Below we summarize the confirmed and expected parameters.

    ParameterWatch Buds (2022)Watch Buds 2 (2026)
    DisplayAMOLED 1.43″, 466 × 466 pxAMOLED 1.5″, LTPO (expected)
    CaseStainless steel, 47 mmAluminum alloy, ~46 mm (expected)
    Headphones2× TWS with ANC, IP542× TWS with ANC 2.0 (expected)
    Watch battery lifeUp to 3 daysUp to 5 days (expected)
    Headphone battery~4 hours on charge~5–6 hours (expected)
    Battery capacity410 mAh~450 mAh (expected)
    SystemHarmonyOS 3.0HarmonyOS NEXT 5.0
    GPSDual-band L1 + L5Dual-band L1 + L5
    Health monitoringTruSeen 5.0, SpO2TruSeen 6.0, EKG, blood pressure (expected)
    Water resistance of the watch5 ATM5 ATM
    ConnectivityBluetooth 5.2, NFCBluetooth 5.4, NFC
    Sport modes80+100+ (expected)
    Launch price (PL)2299 zł~2499–2699 zł (estimate)

    The most important changes concern TWS headphones. Huawei claims better transducers, a second generation of active noise cancellation (ANC 2.0), and support for the LDAC codec, which theoretically will raise the sound quality to the level of separate headphones costing 400–500 zł. This is crucial for those who consider the Watch Buds a real replacement for a pair of TWS.

    How Huawei Watch Buds 2 works, a watch with hidden headphones

    The mechanism remains the same. The magnetic disc opens under the thumb, revealing two slots with headphones. The headphones charge inside the watch, the case serves as both a case and a power bank. When you don’t need music, the watch looks like a classic smartwatch with a round face.

    This concept solves the daily inconvenience: carrying two devices (watch + headphone case) and managing two batteries. Watch Buds 2 integrates one with the other, and after removing the headphones, the watch still shows notifications, measures heart rate, and tracks steps. In the first generation, the entire cycle of «touch, open, put on headphones» took about 3 seconds. The new case is expected to be thinner and lighter by about 8 g.

    Note: The headphones in Watch Buds 2 are the size of bullet-type headphones (elongated capsules), not classic AirPods. People with small ears should try them on before purchasing, the dimensions of the first generation headphones are 21.8 × 10.3 × 10.3 mm, the new version is expected to be comparable.

    AI Features and HarmonyOS NEXT in Watch Buds 2

    The second generation debuts with a new system HarmonyOS NEXT 5.0, which Huawei presents as a separate platform from Android. In practice, this means three significant changes for the user of Watch Buds 2.

    AI Health Coach, a health assistant based on a language model

    The first generation measured parameters but couldn’t interpret them. HarmonyOS NEXT introduces AI Health Coach, an assistant that analyzes pulse, sleep, activity, and suggests specific actions. Noticed poorer sleep quality for three nights in a row? It will suggest a shorter nap or a change in meal time. This is a local feature; most calculations happen on the watch without sending data to the cloud.

    Smart headphone modes

    The Watch Buds 2 headphones automatically adapt to the situation. Adaptive ANC recognizes the environment, enhancing noise reduction on the train, and switching to transparent mode in the office. During a phone call, the voice isolation system cuts out background noise, which you’ll appreciate on a busy street or in a café.

    Live conversation translation

    The Watch Buds 2 supports live translation between several languages (including Polish). The feature works in tandem with a Huawei smartphone from the Pura 80 or Mate series, allowing you to hear the translation in the headphones while the conversation partner sees the transcription on the phone screen. This is not a substitute for a translator but assistance in simple situations (shopping, ordering in a restaurant, asking for directions).

    Huawei Watch Buds 2 price, how much will it cost?

    The manufacturer has not yet announced an official price, but based on the first generation and pricing trends in the hybrid wearables segment, we estimate the launch price of the Watch Buds 2 in Poland to be 2499–2699 PLN. For comparison:

    DevicePriceType
    Huawei Watch Buds (1st gen)2299 złSmartwatch + headphones
    Huawei Watch 51999 złFlagship smartwatch
    Huawei Watch GT 61499 złSports smartwatch
    Huawei Watch Ultimate3799 złPremium smartwatch
    Samsung Galaxy Watch 81899 złSmartwatch with Wear OS
    Apple Watch Series 102299 złiOS smartwatch

    Watch Buds 2 is positioned in the premium segment, you are not just paying for a better smartwatch, but for the convenience of wearing one device instead of two. If you still need a smartwatch and TWS, the sum of ~1500 zł (watch) + ~800 zł (ANC headphones) gives 2300 zł. The difference becomes symbolic.

    Want to check the current offer? Also see the full range of accessories for Huawei Watch 5 at homescreen.pl, straps, protective glasses, and screen protectors.

    Watch Buds 2 vs first generation, what has changed

    The first generation had three weak points: short battery life of the headphones (about 4 hours), thick case (14.99 mm), and limited compatibility with iPhone. The second generation addresses all three.

    • Battery of the headphones, expected 5–6 hours of single use, with the possibility of recharging in the watch for a total of 20 hours of playback
    • Thickness, the case is thinner by about 1.5 mm thanks to the new magnetic mechanism
    • iOS compatibility, full support for iPhone through the Huawei Health app (notifications, activity tracking, music control)
    • Headphones, ANC 2.0, LDAC support, dual microphone with noise reduction
    • Health, added blood pressure measurement (after calibration with a cuff) and real-time stress analysis
    • Connectivity, Bluetooth 5.4 instead of 5.2, which reduces latency and increases range

    Who is Huawei Watch Buds 2 for

    Watch Buds 2 is not a device for everyone. If you already have a good pair of headphones and a smartwatch, a dual solution will not be better than dedicated devices. However, for three groups of users, it is a great choice.

    Osoby minimalizujące codzienne „noszenie», jedno urządzenie zamiast dwóch, jedna bateria do pilnowania, jeden ładownik w torbie. Jeśli codziennie zapominasz etui ze słuchawkami w domu lub w pracy, Watch Buds 2 rozwiązuje ten problem fizycznie.

    Podróżnicy i osoby dojeżdżające, szybki dostęp do słuchawek bez wyciągania etui z plecaka, tłumaczenie na żywo w podróży, dobra jakość rozmów telefonicznych dzięki dwóm mikrofonom. Dodatkowo monitoring snu przyda się w samolocie.

    Entuzjaści ekosystemu Huawei, jeśli masz smartfon Huawei Pura 80 albo z serii Mate, integracja z HarmonyOS NEXT działa płynnie. Dla posiadaczy iPhone’a i Androida od innych producentów funkcjonalność jest okrojona o 15–20%.

    Nasz wybór: Watch Buds 2 rekomendujemy osobom, dla których wygoda „jedno urządzenie» przeważa nad maksymalną jakością dźwięku i osobnymi funkcjami zegarka.

    Alternatywy dla Huawei Watch Buds 2

    Jeśli koncept hybrydowego urządzenia Cię nie przekonuje, warto rozważyć trzy klasyczne kombinacje:

    Smartwatch + osobne słuchawki TWS (budżet). Huawei Watch GT 5 (999 zł) plus dowolna para słuchawek TWS (300–500 zł) da podobne funkcje za mniej pieniędzy. Minus: dwa urządzenia do ładowania i noszenia.

    Apple Watch + AirPods Pro 3. For iPhone users, this is probably the best combination, with full integration with iOS, dictation, Handoff, and Apple Music. The total cost is around 3400 PLN, but you get two separate, best-in-class devices. Matching accessories: Apple Watch bands and AirPods Pro 3.

    Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 + Galaxy Buds 4 Pro. For Android and Samsung users, the Galaxy ecosystem offers seamless integration. Total cost: around 2800 PLN. On homescreen.pl you will find a full selection of cases for Galaxy Watch 8 and Galaxy Buds 4 headphones.

    What Will Be Missing in Watch Buds 2

    The full specification is not yet available, but knowing Huawei’s strategy from previous generations, three areas can be identified where Watch Buds 2 will likely not match the competition.

    • Google Pay / Apple Pay, HarmonyOS supports Huawei Pay, but in Poland, integration with banks is limited (only selected cards work)
    • App Store, AppGallery does not match Google Play or App Store, lacking popular fitness apps (Strava, AllTrails)
    • GPS Support for Advanced Sports, despite dual-band L1+L5, the watch does not offer as precise analytics as Garmin or dedicated sports watches

    If your main goal is professional training tracking, the Huawei Watch Ultimate or the Garmin series are a better choice. The Watch Buds 2 is more of a versatile everyday tool than specialized sports equipment.

    Summary, it’s worth waiting for the Huawei Watch Buds 2

    The Huawei Watch Buds 2 is not a device for everyone, but it has no competition in its niche. The second generation fixes the weak points of its predecessor (battery, thickness, ANC) and adds HarmonyOS NEXT with AI features. Premiere on April 20, 2026, availability in Poland expected in June–July 2026, estimated price 2499–2699 PLN.

    If you want one device instead of two and live in the Huawei ecosystem, wait and buy. If you are an iPhone user or an Android user from another manufacturer, consider whether the lost integration functionality is worth the convenience. And if you already have a good smartwatch and headphones, there’s no reason to change.

    FAQ, frequently asked questions about Watch Buds 2

    When is the release of Huawei Watch Buds 2?

    Huawei Watch Buds 2 will officially debut on April 20, 2026 during the global event accompanying the launch of the Huawei Pura 80 series. Availability in Poland is expected in the second quarter of 2026, with the most likely months being June and July.

    How much will Huawei Watch Buds 2 cost?

    Huawei has not yet announced an official price. We estimate it to be 2499–2699 PLN, based on the price of the first generation (2299 PLN) and expected improvements. The first generation cost 2299 PLN, so the new model will likely increase by 10–15%.

    What headphones are in Watch Buds 2?

    The watch hides two bullet-type TWS earbuds (elongated capsules) with second-generation active noise cancellation (ANC 2.0). The expected battery life on a single charge is 5–6 hours, and the watch case charges them for a total of 20 hours of playback.

    What distinguishes Watch Buds 2 from the first generation?

    The main changes are: a thinner case (about 1.5 mm), longer battery life for the earbuds (5–6 h instead of 4 h), the HarmonyOS NEXT 5.0 system with AI Health Coach, Bluetooth 5.4, LDAC codec, blood pressure measurement, and full iPhone support. The price will increase by about 200–400 PLN.

    Do the headphones in the Watch Buds 2 sound like separate AirPods?

    According to specifications and initial leaks, yes. Support for the LDAC codec, larger drivers, and ANC 2.0 are expected to provide sound quality comparable to TWS headphones in the 400–600 PLN segment. The first generation reached the level of around 250 PLN headphones.

    Where to buy accessories for Watch Buds 2?

    Replacement straps, protective glass for the dial, and films can be found at homescreen.pl, categories Huawei Watch 5 and watch straps offer compatible accessories for most Huawei models. For Watch Buds 2, the first products will appear after the premiere.

  • Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — comparison

    Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — comparison

    Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are two top foldable smartphones in a book style. Which one to choose? We compare specifications, cameras, batteries, and prices.

    Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — this is the clash that the entire foldable smartphone market has been waiting for in 2026. Motorola debuts in the book format with a 6000 mAh battery, a triple 50 MP camera (DXOMARK Gold certification), and a price starting from 9999 zł (8499 zł with cashback).

    Samsung responds with the proven One UI 8 ecosystem, a 200 MP camera, Galaxy AI, and a price starting at around 6450 zł in stores (RRP 8799 zł). Which of them will perform better as your daily smartphone? Below is a detailed comparison of specifications, cameras, batteries, and prices — with specific recommendations for different types of users.

    Specifications — comparison table

    Before we get into the details, here are the key parameters of both smartphones in one table:

    ParametrMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
    Wewnętrzny ekran8,09″ LTPO pOLED, 2K, 120 Hz, 6200 nitów8,0″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2K, 120 Hz
    Zewnętrzny ekran6,6″ pOLED, 165 Hz, 6000 nitów6,5″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120 Hz
    ProcesorSnapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3 nm)Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (3 nm)
    RAM16 GB LPDDR5X12 GB / 16 GB (1 TB)
    Pamięć512 GB UFS 4.1256 / 512 GB / 1 TB
    Aparat główny50 MP Sony LYTIA 828, f/1.6, OIS200 MP, f/1.7, OIS
    Teleobiektyw50 MP Sony LYTIA 600, 3x zoom10 MP, f/2.4, 3x zoom
    Ultraszerokokątny50 MP, f/2.0, 122°12 MP, f/2.2, 123°
    Selfie (zewnętrzny ekran)32 MP10 MP
    Selfie (wewnętrzny ekran)20 MP10 MP
    Wideo8K @ 30 fps Dolby Vision, 4K @ 120 fps8K @ 30 fps, 4K @ 60 fps
    Bateria6000 mAh (Si/C)4400 mAh
    Ładowanie przewodowe80 W TurboPower45 W
    Ładowanie bezprzewodowe50 W + 5 W reverse15 W + 4,5 W reverse
    OdpornośćIPX9IP48
    SystemAndroid 16 (7 lat aktualizacji)Android 16 + One UI 8 (7 lat)
    RysikMoto Pen Ultra (w zestawie)S Pen (opcjonalny)
    Wymiary (złożony)160,1 × 73,6 × 10,1 mm158,5 × 72,8 × 8,9 mm
    Waga243 g215 g
    Ochrona ekranuGorilla Glass Ceramic 3Gorilla Glass Victus 2
    Cena w Polsce (RRP)9999 zł (16/512 GB)8799 zł (12/256 GB)
    Cena rynkowa (kwiecień 2026)od ~8499 zł (z cashbackiem)od ~6450 zł (Ceneo/Allegro)

    Razr Fold vs Z Fold 7 — brightness and refresh rate

    Motorola Razr Fold offers slightly larger screens and significantly higher brightness. The internal display 8.09 inches with a brightness of 6200 nits is one of the brightest panels in foldable smartphones — readable even in full sunlight. The external display 6.6 inches with a refresh rate of 165 Hz is better suited for gaming and fast scrolling of content.

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has an internal display of 8.0 inches and an external display of 6.5 inches — both with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and Dynamic AMOLED 2X technology. Samsung does not provide peak brightness, but in practice, the panel is bright enough for everyday use.

    Screen verdict: Motorola wins in brightness and size, Samsung offers proven Dynamic AMOLED technology with deeper blacks and excellent color calibration. If you use your smartphone outdoors a lot — Razr Fold will be the better choice.

    Camera — 50 MP vs 200 MP

    To jedna z najciekawszych różnic. Samsung stawia na jeden duży sensor 200 MP z binningiem pikseli, Motorola na trzy aparaty 50 MP z topowymi sensorami Sony LYTIA.

    Motorola Razr Fold — potrójny 50 MP

    • 50 MP Sony LYTIA 828 (f/1.6, OIS) — duży sensor 1/1,28″ z doskonałą wydajnością w słabym oświetleniu
    • 50 MP ultraszerokokątny (f/2.0, 122°) — z trybem makro od 3,5 cm
    • 50 MP teleobiektyw Sony LYTIA 600 (3x zoom, OIS) — peryskopowy, z AI Super Zoom Pro do 100x
    • Certyfikat DXOMARK Gold 2026 — 164/175 punktów

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 200 MP z AI

    • 200 MP (f/1.7, OIS) — binning do 12,5 MP, doskonałe szczegóły w dziennym świetle
    • 12 MP ultra-wide (f/2.2, 123°)
    • 10 MP telephoto (f/2.4, 3x zoom, OIS)
    • Galaxy AI — zaawansowana edycja zdjęć i generatywne narzędzia

    W praktyce różnica jest najbardziej widoczna przy zoomie. Motorola z teleobiektywem 50 MP i peryskopem zachowuje dużo szczegółów przy 3x i daje użyteczne zdjęcia nawet przy 10x. Samsung z teleobiektywem zaledwie 10 MP szybko traci ostrość powyżej 3x — szczegóły rozmywają się już przy 5x.

    W słabym oświetleniu Motorola korzysta z dużego sensora Sony LYTIA 828 (1/1,28″) — jednego z największych w składanych smartfonach. Samsung kompensuje mniejszy sensor zaawansowanym przetwarzaniem AI i wieloklatkowym HDR, co daje dobre wyniki, ale z mniejszą ilością naturalnych szczegółów.

    Do nagrywania wideo Motorola oferuje 4K @ 120 fps i 8K z Dolby Vision — Samsung ogranicza się do 4K @ 60 fps i 8K bez Dolby Vision. Dla twórców wideo to konkretna przewaga Razr Fold.

    Samsung z kolei wygrywa w dziennych portretach dzięki sensorowi 200 MP i lepszej postprodukcji Galaxy AI — automatyczne upiększanie, generatywna edycja i Circle to Search to funkcje, których Motorola nie oferuje na tym poziomie.

    Bateria Razr Fold vs Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 6000 vs 4400 mAh

    To największa różnica między tymi smartfonami i główny argument za Motorolą.

    ParametrMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
    Pojemność6000 mAh (Si/C)4400 mAh
    Różnica36% mniej
    Ładowanie przewodowe80 W TurboPower45 W
    Ładowanie bezprzewodowe50 W15 W
    Reverse wireless5 W4,5 W
    Deklarowany czas pracydo 59 h (cykl mieszany)brak oficjalnych danych

    Motorola Razr Fold z baterią 6000 mAh to największa bateria w segmencie składanych smartfonów. W porównaniu z Galaxy Z Fold 7 (4400 mAh) oferuje 36% więcej pojemności. Motorola deklaruje do 59 godzin pracy w cyklu mieszanym — w praktyce oznacza to 1,5-2 dni typowego użytkowania bez ładowania.

    Charging 80 W TurboPower allows you to recharge from 0 to 50% in about 15 minutes. Samsung with 45 W charging takes about 25-30 minutes for the same — that’s almost twice as long.

    Wireless charging 50 W in Motorola is over three times faster than 15 W in Samsung. For those using wireless chargers, this is an important difference.

    Tip: For the Motorola Razr Fold, you need a wall charger supporting TurboPower 80 W (USB PD 3.0), while for Samsung, a 45 W charger with PD/PPS is sufficient. Check USB-C cables that support fast charging.

    Performance, system, and stylus

    Both smartphones use top Qualcomm processors in a 3 nm process, but they are slightly different chipsets with variations in clock speed and performance.

    Motorola Razr FoldSnapdragon 8 Gen 5 with cores 2×3.8 GHz + 6×3.32 GHz and Adreno 829 GPU. 16 GB RAM and 512 GB UFS 4.1 in the only available variant. Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 scores about 2300 points in Geekbench Single-Core and 9100 points in Multi-Core.

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy with cores 2×4.47 GHz + 6×3.53 GHz and Adreno 830 GPU. Higher clock speeds translate to about 3100 points in Geekbench Single-Core and 10,200 points in Multi-Core — 15-20% advantage in single-threaded tasks. In everyday use — scrolling through social media, switching apps, browsing websites — the difference is negligible. Both smartphones are extremely fast.

    Software

    In terms of software, Samsung has a clear advantage. One UI 8 is the most refined interface for foldable smartphones — with multitasking features (App Pair, Multi-window, floating windows), Galaxy AI (real-time translations, generative photo editing, call transcription, Circle to Search) and a rich ecosystem of accessories. If you have a Galaxy Watch or Galaxy Buds — the integration with Samsung is unmatched.

    Motorola offers a cleaner Android 16 with minimal overlay, but with fewer features dedicated to foldable screens. Motorola’s interface is fast and free of bloatware, which will be appreciated by those who prefer a pure Android experience.

    Both models will receive 7 years of system updates — support until 2032 (Samsung) and 2033 (Motorola).

    S Pen

    Motorola Razr Fold has a significant advantage: the Moto Pen Ultra is included in the package. It supports precise drawing, note-taking, and navigation through the interface on the large 8.09-inch screen.

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 supports the S Pen, but it must be purchased separately (about 200-350 PLN). The S Pen offers comparable functionality — note-taking, drawing, Air Gestures — but the additional cost must be added to the price of the smartphone.

    Design and durability — weight, thickness, and resistance

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is lighter (215 g vs 243 g) and thinner when folded (8.9 mm vs 10.1 mm). For those carrying a smartphone in their pants pocket, this is a significant difference — 28 g and over a millimeter less is a noticeable change in carrying comfort.

    Motorola features a teardrop hinge made of stainless steel, which eliminates the visible gap when folded — at Samsung, this gap is still visible. When unfolded, Motorola has a thickness of 4.7 mm, while Samsung has 4.2 mm — here Samsung is slightly thinner.

    Available colors:
    Motorola: Pantone Blackened Blue, Pantone Lily White (+ FIFA edition with 24-karat gold)
    Samsung: Silver Gray, Navy Blue, Black

    In terms of durability, both smartphones have different priorities:
    Motorola: IPX9 (water jets under pressure + immersion up to 1.5 m for 30 min), Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3
    Samsung: IP48 (dust resistant above 1 mm + splashes of water), Gorilla Glass Victus 2

    Motorola offers better water resistance (IPX9 > IPX8 in Samsung), Samsung better dust protection (IP4X vs no dustproof certification in Motorola). If you often use your smartphone at the beach or in a workshop — each model has its own strengths here.

    Price of Razr Fold vs Z Fold 7 in Poland

    WariantMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
    12/256 GBRRP 8799 zł / rynkowa od ~6450 zł
    12/512 GBRRP 9999 zł / rynkowa od ~7200 zł
    16/512 GB9999 zł (cashback 1500 zł → 8499 zł)
    16/1 TBRRP 11 349 zł
    Edycja limitowanaFIFA World Cup 26™: 11 499 zł

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 jest na rynku od lipca 2025 roku, więc jego ceny rynkowe zdążyły znacząco spaść. Na Ceneo i Allegro wariant 256 GB można kupić już od ok. 6450 zł — ponad 2000 zł taniej niż w oficjalnym sklepie Samsung.

    Porównując najbardziej zbliżone konfiguracje:

    • Motorola 16/512 GB (8499 zł z cashbackiem) vs Samsung 12/512 GB (od ~7200 zł rynkowo) — Samsung jest w tej chwili ok. 1300 zł tańszy, choć oferuje mniej RAM (12 vs 16 GB) i nie ma rysika w zestawie
    • Samsung 12/256 GB (od ~6450 zł) to najtańszy punkt wejścia — o ponad 2000 zł mniej niż Motorola, co czyni go znacznie bardziej przystępnym, choć z mniejszą pamięcią, mniejszą baterią i bez rysika

    Akcesoria — etui, folie i ładowarki

    Ochrona składanego smartfona to priorytet — wymiana ekranu pOLED kosztuje nawet kilka tysięcy złotych. W homescreen.pl znajdziesz akcesoria do obu modeli.

    Do Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — dostępne są m.in. etui i folie ochronne do Galaxy Z Fold 7 od Samsung, 3MK, Ringke, UAG, PITAKA i PanzerGlass. Ceny od 15,99 zł (folia GrizzGlass) do 379 zł (etui Samsung Carbon Shield Case).

    Do Motorola Razr Fold — w ofercie są folie hydrożelowe i ochrony na obiektyw od 3MK, Bizon Glass i GrizzGlass. Ze względu na składany ekran pOLED zalecane są folie hydrożelowe zamiast tradycyjnych szkieł hartowanych.

    Kompletny zestaw ochronny? Etui + folia na ekran wewnętrzny + szkło na obiektyw aparatu. Sprawdź też powerbanki — przydadzą się zwłaszcza z Galaxy Z Fold 7, który ma mniejszą baterię.

    Motorola Razr Fold czy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — który wybrać?

    Motorola Razr Fold i Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 to dwa najlepsze składane smartfony w stylu książki w 2026 roku — ale skierowane do różnych użytkowników. Nie ma jednoznacznego zwycięzcy. Motorola dominuje w specyfikacji sprzętowej (bateria, aparat, ładowanie), a Samsung w oprogramowaniu i ekosystemie. Decyzja zależy od Twoich priorytetów.

    Samsung has been on the market for 9 months and its market prices have dropped significantly — the 256 GB variant costs around 6450 zł, and the 512 GB from around 7200 zł. Motorola with cashback comes out to 8499 zł for 16/512 GB. Samsung is therefore cheaper, but Motorola offers more RAM (16 vs 12 GB), a better battery, a camera with a DXOMARK Gold certification, and a stylus included. Samsung, on the other hand, provides access to Galaxy AI, a lighter construction (215 g), and the best software for foldable screens on the market.

    Choose the Motorola Razr Fold if:
    – You care about long battery life (6000 vs 4400 mAh)
    – You photograph and record videos (better telephoto lens, 4K @ 120 fps, DXOMARK Gold)
    – You want a stylus included without extra payment
    – You do not need the Samsung ecosystem (Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Buds, DeX)

    Choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 if:
    – You use the Samsung ecosystem (watch, headphones, tablet)
    – You care about a lighter and slimmer construction (215 g vs 243 g)
    – You value Galaxy AI and advanced multitasking features of One UI
    – You want more memory options (256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB)
    – You are looking for a lower entry price (from ~6450 zł market price vs 9999 zł)

    Jeśli porównasz modele w podobnej konfiguracji pamięci (512 GB), Motorola z cashbackiem wychodzi 800 zł taniej i oferuje lepszą baterię, aparat i rysik w zestawie. Samsung odpowiada lepszym oprogramowaniem, lżejszą konstrukcją i szerszym ekosystemem akcesoriów.

    FAQ

    Który składany smartfon ma lepszą baterię — Razr Fold czy Galaxy Z Fold 7?

    Motorola Razr Fold ma baterię 6000 mAh — o 36% większą niż 4400 mAh w Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7. To obecnie największa bateria w segmencie składanych smartfonów.

    Ile kosztuje Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 w Polsce?

    Motorola Razr Fold kosztuje 9999 zł (8499 zł z cashbackiem) w wersji 16/512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 ma RRP od 8799 zł, ale w sklepach (Ceneo, Allegro) dostępny jest już od ok. 6450 zł za wersję 12/256 GB.

    Który ma lepszy aparat — Motorola Razr Fold czy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

    Motorola Razr Fold z potrójnym aparatem 50 MP (Sony LYTIA) zdobyła certyfikat DXOMARK Gold 2026 (164/175 pkt). Samsung ma sensor 200 MP z lepszym binningiem pikseli. Motorola wygrywa w teleobiektyw (50 vs 10 MP) i wideo (4K @ 120 fps).

    Który składany smartfon jest lżejszy?

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 weighs 215 g, Motorola Razr Fold — 243 g. Samsung is 28 g lighter and 1.2 mm slimmer when folded.

    Do both smartphones have a stylus?

    Motorola Razr Fold comes with the Moto Pen Ultra stylus included. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 supports the S Pen, but it needs to be purchased separately for about 200-350 PLN.

  • Motorola Razr Fold — premiere, price and specifications

    Motorola Razr Fold — premiere, price and specifications

    Motorola Razr Fold is the first foldable smartphone from Motorola in a book style — with Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, a 6000 mAh battery, and a triple camera of 50 MP. Pre-orders in Poland started from 9999 PLN.

    Motorola Razr Fold is the first foldable smartphone in the brand’s history in a book format — with a crease along the longer edge. In Poland, pre-orders started on April 14, 2026 at a price starting from 9999 PLN (with a cashback of 1500 PLN). It is equipped with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 processor, an internal display of 8.09 inches 2K, a 6000 mAh battery with 80 W charging, and a triple camera of 50 MP with DXOMARK Gold 2026 certification.

    Motorola has been associated with foldable smartphones for years — but so far only in the flip format (Razr series). Razr Fold represents a completely new category in the brand’s portfolio: a large screen that unfolds like a book, directly competing with Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Google Pixel Fold. What exactly does it offer? Is it worth buying in pre-order? We check the specifications, prices, and comparison with the competition.

    Pre-order of Motorola Razr Fold in Poland — price and promotions

    Motorola Razr Fold is available for pre-order from April 14, 2026 with Polish brand partners. Shipping will begin on May 14, 2026.

    Two versions to choose from

    VersionMemoryPricePromotion
    Razr Fold Classic16/512 GB9999 złCashback 1500 zł
    Razr Fold FIFA World Cup 26™16/512 GB11 499 złGroup stage match ticket for the 2026 World Cup

    The FIFA World Cup 26™ edition features the official tournament logo with elements plated in 24-karat gold on a steel casing.

    Two promotions at launch — cashback or World Cup ticket

    Motorola has prepared two independent promotions for the launch of the Razr Fold pre-sale:

    1. Cashback 1500 zł — when purchasing the Classic edition (9999 zł). After registering the purchase on the manufacturer’s website, you will receive a refund of 1500 zł, lowering the effective price to 8499 zł.
    1. Group stage match ticket for the 2026 World Cup — when purchasing the limited edition FIFA World Cup 26™ (11 499 zł). The ticket pertains to this year’s World Cup in the USA, Canada, and Mexico. Promotion available exclusively at RTV Euro AGD, Media Expert, and Orange. The number of units is limited.

    Promotions do not combine — you choose one of two options depending on the version of the smartphone.

    Where to buy?

    Pre-sale is conducted by retail chains: RTV Euro AGD, Media Expert, Media Markt, x-kom, Neonet, Komputronik, Sferis.pl and the Lenovo and Motorola Showroom in Warsaw. The smartphone is also offered by operators: Orange, Play, Plus, and T-Mobile.

    Pre-sale period:
    Classic Edition: April 14 – May 13, 2026
    FIFA Edition: April 14 – June 7, 2026

    Specifications of the Motorola Razr Fold

    Under the hood, the Motorola Razr Fold hides the latest Qualcomm platform in a 3 nm process, 16 GB of RAM, and UFS 4.1 storage. In the foldable smartphone segment, it is also distinguished by a 6000 mAh silicon-carbon battery — the largest in this category. Below is the full technical specification.

    ParametrMotorola Razr Fold
    Wewnętrzny ekran8,09″ LTPO pOLED, 2232 x 2484 px (2K), 120 Hz, HDR10+, 6200 nitów
    Zewnętrzny ekran6,6″ LTPO pOLED, 1080 x 2520 px, 165 Hz, 6000 nitów
    ProcesorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3 nm)
    RAM / Pamięć16 GB LPDDR5X / 512 GB UFS 4.1
    Aparat główny50 MP Sony LYTIA 828, f/1.6, OIS, 1/1,28″
    Teleobiektyw50 MP Sony LYTIA 600, 3x zoom optyczny, OIS
    Ultraszerokokątny50 MP, f/2.0, 122°, makro od 3,5 cm
    Aparat z przodu (zewn.)32 MP, f/2.4
    Aparat z przodu (wewn.)20 MP, f/2.4
    Wideo8K @ 30 fps (Dolby Vision), 4K @ 120 fps
    Bateria6000 mAh (Si/C)
    Ładowanie przewodowe80 W TurboPower
    Ładowanie bezprzewodowe50 W + 5 W reverse
    OdpornośćIPX9
    SystemAndroid 16 (7 lat aktualizacji)
    Łączność5G SA/NSA, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC
    USBType-C 3.2 z DisplayPort 1.2
    Wymiary (rozłożony)160,1 × 144,5 × 4,7 mm
    Wymiary (złożony)160,1 × 73,6 × 10,1 mm
    Waga243 g
    KoloryPantone Blackened Blue, Pantone Lily White
    RysikMoto Pen Ultra (w zestawie)
    Ochrona ekranuCorning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3

    Ekrany — jasność na poziomie flagowców

    Motorola Razr Fold stands out with two screens of record brightness. The internal display 8.09 inches with a resolution of 2K and a brightness of 6200 nits is one of the brightest panels in smartphones in 2026. It supports Dolby Vision and HDR10+.

    The external screen 6.6 inches with a refresh rate of 165 Hz and a brightness of 6000 nits allows for convenient smartphone use without unfolding. With a higher refresh rate than the internal screen (165 vs 120 Hz), it performs excellently in gaming and scrolling content.

    Both panels are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3 — this is the first smartphone in the world with this type of glass.

    Camera — DXOMARK Gold 2026 certification

    Motorola Razr Fold scored 164 out of 175 points in the DXOMARK benchmark and received the DXOMARK Gold 2026 certification, ranking at the top among foldable smartphones in terms of photography.

    Triple rear camera:

    • 50 MP Sony LYTIA 828 (f/1.6, OIS) — large 1/1.28″ sensor provides excellent quality in low light
    • 50 MP ultraszerokokątny (f/2.0, 122°) — z trybem makro od 3,5 cm
    • 50 MP teleobiektyw Sony LYTIA 600 (3x zoom optyczny) — z AI Super Zoom Pro do 100x

    Smartfon nagrywa wideo w rozdzielczości 8K @ 30 fps z Dolby Vision i 4K @ 120 fps — to parametry na poziomie najdroższych flagowców.

    Bateria 6000 mAh — największa w składanych smartfonach

    Bateria 6000 mAh z technologią krzemowo-węglową (Si/C) to obecnie największa bateria w segmencie składanych smartfonów. Motorola deklaruje do 59 godzin pracy w cyklu mieszanym.

    Ładowanie TurboPower 80 W pozwala uzupełnić energię od 0 do 50% w kilkanaście minut. Dostępne jest też ładowanie bezprzewodowe 50 W i zwrotne ładowanie bezprzewodowe 5 W — np. do naładowania słuchawek.

    Are you looking for the right network charger or wireless charger for the Razr Fold? In our store, you will find models compatible with 80 W and 50 W charging.

    Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

    How does the Motorola Razr Fold compare to its main competitor — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7? Let’s compare the key parameters.

    ParameterMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
    Internal display8.09″, 2K, 120 Hz, 6200 nits8.0″, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120 Hz
    External display6.6″, 165 Hz, 6000 nits6.5″, 120 Hz
    ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 5Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
    RAM16 GB12 GB
    Battery6000 mAh4400 mAh
    Charging80 W / 50 W wireless45 W / 15 W wireless
    Main camera50 MP, f/1.6, 1/1.28″50 MP, f/1.8
    Telephoto lens50 MP, 3x zoom10 MP, 3x zoom
    Video8K Dolby Vision8K
    Weight243 g~239 g
    StylusMoto Pen Ultra (included)S Pen (optional)
    Price in Poland9999 zł (with cashback 8499 zł)approx. 9499 zł

    Motorola wins with battery (6000 vs 4400 mAh — that’s 36% more), charging speed (80 W vs 45 W), camera (DXOMARK Gold), and the stylus comes included. Samsung offers a slightly lighter construction and a more mature One UI ecosystem with better app optimization for the foldable screen.

    Tip: If you care about long battery life and a top camera, and don’t need the Samsung ecosystem (Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Buds), the Razr Fold offers a better specifications-to-price ratio — especially with a 1500 zł cashback.

    Design, system, and additional features

    The Motorola Razr Fold has a teardrop hinge made of stainless steel, allowing for complete folding without a visible gap. When unfolded, the smartphone is just 4.7 mm thick — one of the slimmest foldable smartphones on the market.

    The IPX9 certification indicates resistance to water under pressure (water jets) and immersion up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes. The lack of an IP6X certification means the manufacturer has not tested dust resistance.

    Available colors are Pantone Blackened Blue (navy black) and Pantone Lily White (white). The FIFA World Cup 26™ edition features additional elements made of 24-karat gold.

    Razr Fold runs on Android 16 with the Motorola interface. The manufacturer guarantees 7 years of system updates — until 2033. The package includes a stylus Moto Pen Ultra for precise drawing and notes on the large screen — an advantage over Samsung, where the S Pen must be purchased separately.

    USB-C 3.2 with DisplayPort 1.2 allows you to connect the smartphone to a monitor and use it in desktop mode.

    Accessories for Motorola Razr Fold

    On the homescreen.pl store, the first accessories for Motorola Razr Fold are already available — protective films and cases from manufacturers such as 3MK, Bizon Glass, and GrizzGlass. Protecting the foldable screen is particularly important due to the flexible pOLED panel.

    We also recommend checking out protective films tailored for the new Razr Fold and USB-C cables that will fully utilize the TurboPower 80 W fast charging.

    Summary

    Motorola Razr Fold is the best option for those who want a foldable smartphone in a book style with a top-notch camera and battery — without the need to tie themselves to the Samsung ecosystem. A 6000 mAh battery (the largest in foldable smartphones), a DXOMARK Gold certification, and the Moto Pen Ultra stylus included in the package are strong arguments for choosing the Razr Fold.

    The price is 9999 zł (effectively 8499 zł with cashback), placing it competitively against the Galaxy Z Fold 7. Pre-orders are open until May 13, 2026, and shipping starts on May 14. Who is this smartphone not for? For users deeply integrated into the Samsung ecosystem (Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Buds, DeX) — there, One UI still has the advantage.

    FAQ

    How much does the Motorola Razr Fold cost in Poland?

    The Motorola Razr Fold in the 16/512 GB version costs 9999 zł. In the pre-sale, a cashback of 1500 zł is available, which lowers the price to 8499 zł. The limited edition FIFA World Cup 26™ costs 11,499 zł and includes a ticket to a group stage match of the World Cup.

    When will the Motorola Razr Fold be available for sale?

    Pre-orders started on April 14, 2026. Shipping of pre-order items begins on May 14, 2026. The smartphone can be ordered, among others, at RTV Euro AGD, Media Expert, x-kom, and from operators.

    How does the Motorola Razr Fold differ from the Galaxy Z Fold 7?

    Razr Fold has a larger battery (6000 vs 4400 mAh), faster charging (80 W vs 45 W), a better camera according to DXOMARK, and a stylus included. Samsung offers a lighter design and more refined software for foldable screens.

    Is the Motorola Razr Fold waterproof?

    The smartphone has an IPX9 certification, which confirms resistance to water jets under pressure and immersion up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes. It does not have a dust resistance certification (IP6X).

    What accessories fit the Motorola Razr Fold?

    On homescreen.pl, hydrogel films, protective cases, and camera lens glasses are available from manufacturers 3MK, Bizon Glass, and GrizzGlass. Due to the pOLED foldable screen, hydrogel films are recommended instead of traditional tempered glasses.

    Does the Motorola Razr Fold come with a stylus?

    Yes, the Razr Fold comes with the Moto Pen Ultra stylus, which supports precise drawing and notes on the large 8.09-inch screen.

  • Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra — which camera is better? Comparison

    Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra — which camera is better? Comparison

    Vivo X300 Ultra and OPPO Find X9 Ultra are the only smartphones with a dual 200 MP setup — but each realizes this idea differently. Vivo focuses on ZEISS T* optics with gimbal stabilization and a 400 mm teleconverter, while OPPO responds with a triple optical zoom from Hasselblad (3× + 10×) and a 7050 mAh battery. Which one better replaces a compact camera? We compare them point by point.

    OPPO Find X9 Ultra has its global premiere on April 21, 2026 — it is the first Ultra model in OPPO’s history to hit the European markets. Vivo X300 Ultra has been available for pre-order in Europe since April 16. Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor and Sony LYT-901 main sensor, but differ in practically everything else.

    Note: OPPO Find X9 Ultra had not yet officially premiered at the time of publication of this article. OPPO specifications are based on official announcements from the manufacturer, certification entries (China Telecom), and reliable leaks.

    Looking for accessories for the new flagship? Check out cases and glass for OPPO Find X9 and accessories for Vivo X phones at Home Screen.

    Specifications Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra

    ParametrVivo X300 UltraOPPO Find X9 Ultra
    PremieraApril 2026 (Europe)April 21, 2026 (globally)
    Ekran6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3168), 144 Hz, ZEISS Master Color6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3120), 144 Hz, 3600 nits
    Ochrona ekranuArmor GlassNanoCrystal Shield
    ProcesorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
    RAM12/16 GB LPDDR5X12/16 GB LPDDR5X
    Pamięć256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1
    Aparat główny200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.85, OIS gimbal, ZEISS T*200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.5, OIS, Hasselblad
    Teleobiektyw 3-4×200 MP Samsung HP0 (1/1.4″), f/2.3, 85 mm, 3.7× periscope, ZEISS APO200 MP OmniVision OV52A (1/1.28″), f/2.2, 70 mm, 3× periscope, Hasselblad
    Teleobiektyw 10×none50 MP Samsung JNL (1/2.75″), f/3.5, 230 mm, 10× periscope
    Ultraszerokokątny50 MP Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″), f/2.0, 116°, OIS50 MP Sony LYT-600 (1/1.95″), f/2.0, 120°
    Sensor wielospektralny5 MP VCS 3rd generation3.2 MP (color reproduction accuracy)
    Selfie50 MP, f/2.5, AF50 MP, AF
    Wideo8K/30, 4K/120 10-bit Log (all lenses), APV 422, ACES, Dolby Vision4K/120, 10-bit, Dolby Vision HDR
    Bateria6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)7050 mAh (silicon-carbon)
    Ładowanie przewodowe100 W100 W SuperVOOC
    Ładowanie bezprzewodowe40 W + reverse50 W AirVOOC + 10 W reverse
    Wymiary8.19 mm thickness163.04 × 76.91 × 9.15 mm
    Waga232-237 g235-238 g
    WodoodpornośćIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
    Bluetooth5.45.4
    Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
    NFC / IRyes / yesyes / yes
    USBType-C 3.2, DisplayPortType-C 3.2
    SIMdual nano-SIMdual nano-SIM
    Czytnik linii papilarnychultrasonic, under displayultrasonic, under display
    Głośnikistereo, Hi-Resstereo
    SystemAndroid 16, OriginOS 6Android 16, ColorOS 16
    Partnerstwo optyczneZEISSHasselblad
    Dedykowany przycisk aparatunoneyes (Camera Quick Launch)
    Telekonwerter zewnętrznyZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra (17.4× zoom)Hasselblad 300 mm
    Łączność satelitarnayes (1 TB version)yes (Satellite version)
    Koloryblack, silver, greenPolar Glacier, Sand Canyon, Earth Tundra
    Cena od (szacowana)~6500 PLN (pre-order)~6000-7000 PLN (estimated, premiere 21.04)

    Pełne specyfikacje obu telefonów można porównać na GSMArena.

    Aparat Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra — ZEISS kontra Hasselblad

    Aparat Vivo X300 Ultra i aparat OPPO Find X9 Ultra to dwa najambitniejsze systemy fotograficzne w smartfonach 2026 roku. Oba mają podwójny układ 200 MP, ale różnią się filozofią i zakresem zoomu.

    Aparat główny — ten sam sensor, inne podejście

    Oba telefony korzystają z tego samego sensora Sony LYT-901 (1/1,12″) — jednego z największych w smartfonach. Kluczowa różnica tkwi w optyce:

    Vivo X300 Ultra ma jaśniejszy teleobiektyw z gimbalową stabilizacją OIS i certyfikacją ZEISS T* (powłoki antyrefleksyjne). Przysłona f/1.85 to solidny wynik.

    OPPO Find X9 Ultra according to leaks goes further with an aperture of f/1.5 — it’s one of the brightest optics in smartphone history (some sources report f/1.8, official data will be revealed on April 21). A brighter lens means more light on the sensor, which translates to better photos in low light. Hasselblad calibration gives photos a distinctive, warm tone.

    OPPO’s advantage in the brightness of the main lens (f/1.5 vs f/1.85). Vivo responds with gimbal stabilization, which can provide sharper images at longer exposure times.

    Zoom – this is where the biggest difference lies

    This is the key point of this comparison.

    Vivo X300 Ultra has one 200 MP telephoto lens with 3.7× optical zoom (85 mm) and an optional ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter, which provides 17.4× optical zoom. In the range of 3.7-17×, it is the best zoom system in a smartphone — but the teleconverter is purchased separately.

    OPPO Find X9 Ultra has two telephoto lenses: 200 MP 3× periscope (70 mm) and 50 MP 10× periscope (230 mm) — both built into the phone. You don’t need any accessories to achieve 10× optical zoom. Lossless zoom reaches up to 40-50× thanks to computations.

    In the range of 3-5× both phones will deliver excellent photos from the 200 MP sensors. Above 5× OPPO has a built-in 10× zoom, while Vivo needs a teleconverter. But with a teleconverter, Vivo achieves 17.4× at full 200 MP — a range unavailable to any other smartphone.

    OPPO wins in versatility (triple zoom without accessories), Vivo wins in maximum range (400 mm with a teleconverter).

    Ultra-wide

    Here Vivo X300 Ultra has a significant advantage. The Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″) sensor is much larger than the Sony LYT-600 (1/1.95″) in OPPO. Additionally, the ultra-wide Vivo has its own OIS stabilization, which OPPO lacks.

    A larger sensor and OIS clearly result in better ultra-wide photos, especially in low light and when recording video.

    Vivo X300 Ultra wins — the 1/1.28″ sensor with OIS is in a different league.

    Night Photos

    Both phones use the same main sensor, the Sony LYT-901, but OPPO has a brighter lens (f/1.5 vs f/1.85). In theory, this provides about 40% more light on the sensor, which should translate into better night photos from the main camera.

    Vivo odpowiada gimbalową stabilizacją OIS, która pozwala na dłuższe czasy naświetlania bez rozmycia. W praktyce oba podejścia dają świetne efekty nocą.

    Lekka przewaga OPPO dzięki potencjalnie jaśniejszemu obiektywowi — ale ostateczna przysłona zostanie potwierdzona na premierze, a realna różnica w jakości zdjęć będzie widoczna dopiero po niezależnych testach.

    Wideo

    Vivo X300 Ultra dominuje w wideo:
    4K/120 fps 10-bit Log na wszystkich obiektywach (główny, tele, ultrawide)
    – Kodowanie APV 422 i workflow ACES
    – 8K/30 fps, Dolby Vision HDR

    OPPO Find X9 Ultra według dotychczasowych informacji nagrywa 4K/120 fps z 10-bitowym kolorem i Dolby Vision HDR. Nagrywanie Log i 8K nie zostało jeszcze potwierdzone przez OPPO — poprzednik Find X9 Pro obsługiwał Log do 4K/120 z ACES, więc model Ultra prawdopodobnie też to oferuje. Pełne szczegóły poznamy po premierze 21 kwietnia.

    Vivo wygrywa wideo — 10-bit Log na każdym obiektywie i APV 422 to profesjonalne narzędzia. Do stabilnego nagrywania filmów w ruchu przyda się statyw lub gimbal do telefonu.

    Ekran – bliźniacze parametry

    ParametrVivo X300 UltraOPPO Find X9 Ultra
    Przekątna6,82″ LTPO AMOLED6,82″ LTPO AMOLED
    Rozdzielczość1440 × 3168 (2K)1440 × 3120 (2K)
    Odświeżanie144 Hz144 Hz
    Jasność szczytowa4500 nitów (deklarowane)3600 nitów
    KalibracjaZEISS Master ColorHDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid
    OchronaArmor GlassNanoCrystal Shield

    Oba telefony mają niemal identyczne ekrany — 6,82″ LTPO AMOLED z rozdzielczością 2K i odświeżaniem 144 Hz. To jedne z najlepszych wyświetlaczy na rynku.

    Vivo deklaruje wyższą jasność szczytową (4500 vs 3600 nitów) i oferuje kalibrację ZEISS Master Color — bonus dla fotografów oceniających zdjęcia na ekranie. OPPO odpowiada obsługą HDR Vivid i NanoCrystal Shield jako ochroną ekranu.

    Minimalny remis — oba ekrany są doskonałe. Vivo ma potencjalnie jaśniejszy panel, ale bez niezależnych testów trudno to potwierdzić.

    Bateria i ładowanie

    ParametrVivo X300 UltraOPPO Find X9 Ultra
    Pojemność6600/7000 mAh (krzem-węgiel)7050 mAh (krzem-węgiel)
    Ładowanie przewodowe100 W100 W SuperVOOC
    Ładowanie bezprzewodowe40 W50 W AirVOOC
    Ładowanie zwrotnetak (bezprzewodowe)tak (10 W bezprzewodowe)
    Żywotność80% po 1200 cyklachbrak danych

    OPPO Find X9 Ultra ma najnowszą baterię krzem-węglową o pojemności 7050 mAh — to jedna z największych baterii w flagowcach na rynku. Vivo oferuje 6600 lub 7000 mAh w zależności od wariantu.

    Ładowanie przewodowe jest identyczne (100 W), ale OPPO ma lepsze ładowanie bezprzewodowe (50 W AirVOOC vs 40 W u Vivo). Oba telefony obsługują ładowanie zwrotne.

    OPPO wygrywa baterią — gwarantowane 7050 mAh i szybsze ładowanie bezprzewodowe.

    Planujesz zabrać flagowca na dłuższą wycieczkę? Sprawdź powerbanki do smartfona i ładowarki sieciowe w Home Screen.

    Budowa, waga i wodoodporność

    Oba telefony mają certyfikaty IP68 i IP69 — przetrwają zanurzenie w wodzie i strumień gorącej wody pod ciśnieniem. Fotografowanie w deszczu nie stanowi problemu.

    OPPO Find X9 Ultra jest nieco grubszy (9,15 mm vs 8,19 mm u Vivo) i waży 235-238 g. Dostępny w trzech wariantach kolorystycznych z ekoskórą: Polar Glacier (jasnoniebieski), Sand Canyon (pomarańczowy) i Earth Tundra (ciemnobrązowy). Ma dedykowany przycisk aparatu (Camera Quick Launch) i przycisk szybkiego dostępu Plus Key.

    Vivo X300 Ultra jest smuklejszy (8,19 mm) i waży 232-237 g. Dostępny w kolorze czarnym, srebrnym i zielonym z wykończeniem szkłem Armor Glass. Oba telefony mają emiter podczerwieni (IR blaster).

    Remis — Vivo jest smuklejszy, OPPO ma ciekawszy design z ekoskórą i dedykowany przycisk aparatu.

    Vivo X300 Ultra cena vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra cena

    VariantVivo X300 UltraOPPO Find X9 Ultra
    Base~6500 zł (pre-order with Pro Video kit)~6000-7000 zł (estimated, premiere 21.04)
    Top~8600 zł (16 GB/1 TB)no data
    TeleconverterZEISS 400 mm (~2000 zł)Hasselblad 300 mm (price unknown)

    Vivo X300 Ultra price starts from 6500 zł in pre-order with Pro Video Rig Kit — this is the confirmed price. OPPO Find X9 Ultra price has not yet been officially announced and will only appear at the premiere on April 21, 2026. Based on the price of OPPO Find X9 Pro (~5499 zł in Europe), we estimate that OPPO Find X9 Ultra will cost ~6000-7000 zł, but this is just our estimation.

    Both phones have dedicated photographic accessories — teleconverters (ZEISS 400 mm vs Hasselblad 300 mm) and grips with battery.

    OPPO price will be confirmed on April 21 — we will return with an update after the premiere.

    Unique features – what distinguishes each model

    Only Vivo X300 Ultra:

    • ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra Teleconverter — 17.4× optical zoom at 200 MP
    • 4K/120 10-bit Log on all lenses + APV 422 + ACES
    • Ultrawide with 1/1.28″ sensor (Sony LYTIA 818) with OIS
    • 5 MP multispectral sensor VCS 3rd generation
    • Gimbal stabilization OIS (main camera)
    • ZEISS Master Color screen calibration

    Only OPPO Find X9 Ultra:

    • Triple optical zoom (3× + 10×) — without accessories up to 230 mm
    • Main lens f/1.5 — brightest in flagships
    • 7050 mAh battery — largest in comparison
    • 50 W wireless charging AirVOOC
    • Dedicated camera button + Plus Key button
    • Hasselblad Color Calibration on all lenses
    • Hasselblad 300 mm teleconverter
    • 5 years of system updates, 6 years of security updates

    Summary: which one to choose?

    Choose Vivo X300 Ultra if:
    – You record professional videos (10-bit Log on every lens, APV 422)
    – You need extreme zoom with a teleconverter (400 mm, 17.4×)
    – You care about the best ultra-wide angle (1/1.28″ sensor with OIS)
    – You prefer a slimmer design (8.19 mm)
    – You want neutral, true-to-life colors from ZEISS

    Choose OPPO Find X9 Ultra if:
    – You want a built-in triple zoom in the phone (3× + 10× without accessories)
    – You mainly photograph in low light (f/1.5 lens)
    – You care about the largest battery (7050 mAh)
    – You appreciate warm, distinctive colors from Hasselblad
    – You want a dedicated camera button

    Comparing Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra is a clash of two mobile photography philosophies — ZEISS vs Hasselblad, gimbal vs triple zoom, professional video vs versatility without accessories. There is no single winner — your winner is yours.

    Looking for a case, tempered glass, or charger for the new flagship? Check out accessories for OPPO Find X9, Vivo X accessories, and wireless chargers at Home Screen — with free delivery from 100 PLN and a rating of 4.9/5 on Google.

    FAQ – frequently asked questions

    When is the OPPO Find X9 Ultra premiere?
    The global premiere of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra takes place on April 21, 2026. This is the first Ultra model in OPPO’s history to hit the European markets.

    What is the price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra in Poland?
    The price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet been officially announced. Based on the price of the OPPO Find X9 Pro (~5499 PLN), we estimate that the Ultra model will cost around 6000-7000 PLN. The official price will be revealed on April 21.

    Will the OPPO Find X9 Ultra be available in Poland?
    Yes — OPPO has confirmed the global premiere, including for the European markets. In Poland, OPPO is available through Media Expert, among others. The exact date of arrival in stores depends on the distributor.

    Which phone takes better photos?
    The Vivo X300 Ultra camera wins in video (10-bit Log on every lens, APV 422) and ultra-wide (1/1.28″ sensor). The OPPO Find X9 Ultra camera has an advantage in zoom (built-in 10× without accessories) and night photography (f/1.5 lens). Both have the same main sensor, the Sony LYT-901.

    Which phone has a better battery?
    The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has a 7050 mAh battery with 50 W wireless charging. The Vivo X300 Ultra has a 6600-7000 mAh battery with 40 W wireless charging.

    What is the best camera smartphone in 2026?
    The Vivo X300 Ultra, OPPO Find X9 Ultra, and Xiaomi 17 Ultra are the top three camera smartphones of 2026. Each excels in a different category — Vivo in video, OPPO in zoom, Xiaomi in mechanical optical zoom with Leica colors.

    What are the opinions on the OPPO Find X9 Ultra?
    The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet had its official premiere (April 21, 2026), so independent opinions and reviews will appear after this date. Its predecessor — the OPPO Find X9 Pro — ranked 5th in the DxOMark ranking, which bodes well for the Ultra model.

  • Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra – comparison of photographic flagships

    Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra – comparison of photographic flagships

    Vivo X300 Ultra has a dual 200 MP setup with ZEISS optics and a 400 mm teleconverter, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra features a 1-inch Leica sensor with a mechanical zoom of 75-100 mm. Both phones target photographers, but the philosophy of each is completely different — Vivo focuses on raw power and zoom range, while Xiaomi emphasizes the atmosphere of photos and hardware HDR. Which one better replaces a compact camera? If you’re looking for the best photography smartphone of 2026, the choice comes down to these two models.

    Vivo X300 Ultra went on European pre-sale on April 16, 2026, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has been available since the end of February. They are direct rivals in the ultra-premium segment, united by one ambition: to replace the compact camera. However, they differ in philosophy, optics, and price.

    Specifications Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

    ParametrVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Ultra
    PremieraApril 2026 (Europe)February 2026 (globally)
    Ekran6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3168), 144 Hz, ZEISS Master Color6.9″ OLED Xiaomi HyperRGB, 2608×1200, 120 Hz LTPO, 300 Hz touch, 12-bit
    Jasność szczytowa4500 nits (declared)3500 nits
    Ochrona ekranuArmor GlassXiaomi Shield Glass 3.0
    ProcesorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
    RAM12/16 GB LPDDR5X16 GB LPDDR5X
    Pamięć256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1
    Aparat główny200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.85, OIS gimbal, ZEISS T*50 MP Light Fusion 1050L (1″), f/1.67, OIS, LOFIC HDR
    Teleobiektyw200 MP Samsung HP0 (1/1.4″), f/2.3, 85 mm, 3.7× periscope, ZEISS APO200 MP Samsung HPE (1/1.4″), f/2.39-2.96, 75-100 mm mechanical zoom, OIS
    Ultraszerokokątny50 MP Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″), f/2.0, 116°, OIS50 MP Samsung JN5 (1/2.75″), f/2.2, 14 mm, 115°
    Sensor wielospektralny5 MP VCS 3rd generationnone
    Selfie50 MP, f/2.5, AF50 MP OV50M, f/2.2, AF, 21 mm, 90°
    Wideo8K/30, 4K/120 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision, APV 4228K/30, 4K/120 Log, ACES, Dolby Vision, slow-mo 1080p/1920 fps
    Bateria6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)6000 mAh (global version)
    Ładowanie przewodowe100 W90 W (~43 min)
    Ładowanie bezprzewodowe40 W + reverse charging50 W
    Ładowanie zwrotneyes (wireless)yes (22.5 W wired)
    Wymiary8.19 mm thickness162.9 × 77.6 × 8.29 mm
    Waga232-237 g (depending on color)218.4 g (Black/White) / 219 g (Green)
    WodoodpornośćIP68/IP69IP68
    Bluetooth5.46.0
    Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7 (tri-band, Wi-Fi 6e)
    NFCyesyes
    Port podczerwieni (IR)yesyes
    USBType-C 3.2, DisplayPortType-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort
    SIMdual nano-SIMnano+nano or nano+eSIM or eSIM+eSIM
    Czytnik linii papilarnychultrasonic, under displayultrasonic, under display
    Głośnikistereo, Hi-Resstereo, Hi-Res
    SystemAndroid 16, OriginOS 6Android 16, HyperOS 3
    DxOMarknot yet rated166 points (#6 globally)
    Łączność satelitarnayes (1 TB version)none
    Koloryblack, silver, greenblack, white, green (Starlit Green)
    Cena odapprox. 7999 zł for the 16 GB/1 TB variantapprox. 6499

    Pełne specyfikacje obu telefonów można porównać również na GSMArena. Szukasz akcesoriów do swojego nowego flagowca? Sprawdź etui i szkła do Xiaomi 17 Ultra oraz akcesoria do telefonów Vivo X w Home Screen.

    Aparat Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra — kto lepiej fotografuje?

    Tu zaczyna się prawdziwa zabawa — aparat Vivo X300 Ultra i aparat Xiaomi 17 Ultra podchodzą do fotografii mobilnej z zupełnie innej strony.

    Filozofia aparatu

    Vivo X300 Ultra to «technolog» — stawia na surową moc specyfikacji. Podwójny sensor 200 MP (główny Sony LYT-901, f/1.85 + teleobiektyw Samsung HP0, f/2.3) daje ogromne pole do kadrowania i cyfrowego przybliżania. Stabilizacja OIS na poziomie gimbala i certyfikacja ZEISS T* na głównym obiektywie to parametry niespotykane w smartfonach. Do tego ultraszerokokątny obiektyw z dużym sensorem Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1,28″) — znacznie większym niż u konkurencji.

    Xiaomi 17 Ultra is an «artist» — 1-inch main sensor with LOFIC technology (hardware HDR without frame merging) and mechanical optical zoom of 75-100 mm are solutions known from professional cameras. Collaboration with Leica translates into characteristic color reproduction and emulation of Leica M9 films.

    Photo quality during the day

    In good lighting, Vivo X300 Ultra produces more neutral, true-to-life colors. Photos from the 200 MP sensor have an enormous amount of detail — when cropping to a lower resolution, the effect is incredibly sharp.

    Xiaomi 17 Ultra with a 1-inch sensor captures more light and creates more natural background blur (bokeh). Colors in Leica Vibrant mode are warmer and more saturated, while in Leica Authentic mode — truer, with the characteristic «leica look».

    Draw. Vivo wins in detail and resolution, Xiaomi — in atmosphere and color reproduction. The choice depends on the photography style.

    Night mode photos

    Here Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a clear advantage. The 1-inch sensor with LOFIC technology processes exposure information at the hardware level, resulting in more balanced night photos without the typical artifacts from merging multiple frames.

    Vivo X300 Ultra performs well thanks to CIPA 7.0 stabilization, which allows for longer exposure times without blur. In practice, both phones deliver excellent night results, but Xiaomi retains more detail in shadows and better controls noise.

    Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins — the LOFIC sensor is a real advantage in low light.

    Zoom and telephoto lens

    This is the key difference between the two phones.

    Vivo X300 Ultra offers a 200 MP telephoto lens with a focal length of 85 mm (3.7× optical zoom). Additionally, there is an optional ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter that provides up to 17.4× optical zoom at full 200 MP resolution. This is a record among smartphones.

    Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a 200 MP telephoto lens with mechanical optical zoom of 75-100 mm (3.2-4.3×). This is the first such solution in a smartphone — a movable optical element provides true optical zoom without loss of quality across the entire focal length range.

    At 3-5× close-ups, Xiaomi delivers sharper images because it uses optical zoom without digital cropping. Above 5×, Vivo takes the lead — with the teleconverter, it achieves ranges unavailable to any other smartphone.

    Vivo wins in range, Xiaomi — in photo quality in the popular 3-5× range. The ZEISS teleconverter is a powerful accessory, but you buy it separately.

    If you plan to record professional video on your smartphone, a tripod or gimbal for your phone. will also be useful.

    Ultrawide

    Both phones have 50 MP ultrawide lenses with similar fields of view (~116°), but the Vivo X300 Ultra has a huge advantage with the Sony LYTIA 818 sensor sized 1/1.28″ — that’s more than twice the size of the Samsung JN5 (1/2.75″) in the Xiaomi. Additionally, the ultrawide Vivo has its own OIS stabilization.

    In practice, the Vivo X300 Ultra should deliver significantly better ultrawide photos, especially in low light, thanks to the larger sensor and stabilization.

    The Vivo X300 Ultra wins — the 1/1.28″ sensor with OIS is in a completely different league than the 1/2.75″ without stabilization.

    Video

    Both phones record in 8K/30 fps, 4K/120 fps Log with ACES and Dolby Vision support — this is currently the absolute top of smartphone video. The differences lie in the details:

    Vivo X300 Ultra:
    4K/120 fps 10-bit Vivo Log na wszystkich obiektywach (główny, tele, ultra-szeroki)
    – Kodowanie APV 422 (wydajniejszy format niż H.265)
    – Dolby Vision HDR, 8K/30 fps

    Xiaomi 17 Ultra:
    4K/120 fps Log z obsługą ACES (Academy Color Encoding System)
    – Super slow-motion 1080p do 1920 fps
    – Tryby filmowe Leica (ciepłe odwzorowanie kolorów)
    – Nagrywanie ShootSteady do 2,8K/60 fps (zaawansowana stabilizacja)
    – Dolby Vision HDR, 8K/30 fps

    Obie te maszyny oferują profesjonalne narzędzia do wideo — Log, ACES i 4K/120. Kluczowa przewaga Vivo to 10-bitowy Log na każdym obiektywie (nie tylko głównym) i kodowanie APV 422. Xiaomi z kolei oferuje super slow-motion 1080p/1920 fps i stabilizację ShootSteady — idealne do dynamicznych ujęć w ruchu.

    Remis w wideo — oba telefony to profesjonalne narzędzia filmowe. Vivo ma lepsze kodowanie (APV 422) i Log na wszystkich obiektywach, Xiaomi lepsze slow-motion i stabilizację. Do stabilnego nagrywania filmów w ruchu sprawdzi się też kijek do selfie z funkcją statywu.

    Screen — does 2K resolution make a difference?

    ParameterVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Ultra
    Diagonal6.82″ LTPO AMOLED6.9″ OLED Xiaomi HyperRGB
    Resolution1440 × 3168 (2K)2608 × 1200, 12-bit
    Refresh Rate144 Hz120 Hz LTPO
    Peak Brightness4500 nits (declared)3500 nits
    CalibrationZEISS Master ColorDCI-P3, TUV Rheinland
    ProtectionArmor GlassXiaomi Shield Glass 3.0

    Vivo leads in all screen parameters — 2K vs FHD+, 144 Hz vs 120 Hz, and 4500 nits peak brightness (declared) vs 3500 nits for Xiaomi. ZEISS Master Color calibration is an additional bonus for photographers who want to evaluate photos directly on the phone’s screen.

    Xiaomi counters with adaptive LTPO refresh rate, which saves battery by lowering the frequency to 1 Hz when sufficient. The Xiaomi screen offers 12-bit color depth and TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

    Vivo wins with the screen — higher resolution, faster refresh rate, and brighter panel. Xiaomi counters with better color depth (12-bit) and eye protection certifications.

    Battery and charging — Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

    ParameterVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Ultra
    Capacity6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)6000 mAh
    Wired charging100 W90 W (~43 min)
    Wireless charging40 W + reverse charging50 W
    Reverse chargingyes (wireless)yes (10 W wireless, 22.5 W wired)
    Battery life80% after 1200 cyclesno data

    Vivo X300 Ultra has a significantly larger battery — 6600 or even 7000 mAh (depending on the variant) with a silicon-carbon cell, compared to 6000 mAh in the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Faster wired charging (100 W vs 90 W) is an additional advantage. In tests EPREL, Vivo achieved about 57 hours of operation, placing it among the top smartphones. Both phones support reverse charging — you can charge headphones, a watch, or even a second phone with them.

    Xiaomi 17 Ultra has better wireless charging (50 W vs 40 W) and stronger wired reverse charging (22.5 W). In everyday use, both phones easily last a full day of intensive photography.

    Vivo wins in battery capacity (even 1000 mAh more), Xiaomi in wireless and reverse charging.

    Planning to take the flagship on a longer trip? Check out smartphone power banks and wall chargers to ensure that the battery doesn’t die at a crucial moment.

    Build, weight, and water resistance

    You will take both phones in hand and feel the difference — Xiaomi is about 13-19 g lighter. With similar dimensions (~163 × 77 × 8.2-8.3 mm), every gram matters during long photography sessions.

    Vivo X300 Ultra has IP68 and IP69 certifications — it can withstand immersion in water and a stream of hot water under pressure. Xiaomi 17 Ultra has an IP68 certification (immersion up to 6 m for 30 minutes). Taking photos in the rain or by the water is not a problem for either of them.

    Xiaomi 17 Ultra weighs 218.4 g (Black/White) or 219 g (Starlit Green). Available in three colors: black, white, and green. Both phones have an infrared emitter (IR blaster) for controlling home appliances.

    Vivo X300 Ultra weighs 232-237 g (the black is lighter, the green is heavier) and has Armor Glass on the back. The construction is massive but solid — the aluminum frame and flat edges provide a secure grip. Available in black, silver, and green.

    Vivo wins with IP protection (IP68+IP69 vs just IP68), but Xiaomi wins with weight — it is clearly lighter.

    Price in Poland — how much does each flagship cost?

    Xiaomi 17 Ultra’s launch price was 6499 PLN for the 16/512 GB version, but it can currently be purchased from 5295 PLN. The official prices for this model in Poland have not yet been announced, but leaks suggest that Vivo X300 Ultra may cost around 7999 PLN for the 16 GB / 1 TB version.

    Both phones have dedicated photography grips (Xiaomi Photography Kit, SmallRig Kit for Vivo), but you buy them separately. The ZEISS 400 mm teleconverter is a unique accessory that has no equivalent among competitors. The price-to-quality ratio favors Xiaomi — but Vivo with the pre-sale set levels the playing field.

    Unique features — what distinguishes each model

    Only Vivo X300 Ultra:

    • ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter — 17.4× optical zoom in 200 MP
    • Dual sensor 200 MP (main + telephoto) with ZEISS T* optics
    • 4K/120 10-bit Vivo Log on all lenses + ACES workflow
    • Ultrawide with 1/1.28″ sensor (Sony LYTIA 818) with OIS
    • 5 MP multispectral sensor VCS 3rd generation
    • 6600/7000 mAh battery (silicon-carbon)
    • ZEISS Master Color screen calibration
    • BeiDou satellite connectivity (1 TB version)
    • Infrared port (IR blaster)
    • OIS gimbal stabilization

    Only Xiaomi 17 Ultra:

    • Mechanical optical zoom 75-100 mm (first in a smartphone)
    • 1-inch sensor with LOFIC (hardware HDR)
    • Leica film modes (Leica Authentic, Leica Vibrant, film filters)
    • Super slow-motion 1080p/1920 fps
    • Stabilizacja ShootSteady do 2,8K/60 fps
    • Bluetooth 6.0 i Wi-Fi 6e (tri-band)
    • Obsługa eSIM (nano+eSIM lub eSIM+eSIM)
    • DxOMark 166 pkt (#6 globalnie)
    • Xiaomi HyperAI (pisanie SI, tłumacz SI, wyszukiwanie SI)

    Podsumowanie: który wybrać?

    Wybierz Vivo X300 Ultra, jeśli:
    – Nagrywasz dużo wideo (8K i 4K/120 Log to ogromna przewaga nad konkurencją)
    – Potrzebujesz ekstremalnego zoomu (400 mm z telekonwerterem)
    – Chcesz maksymalną rozdzielczość zdjęć (dual 200 MP)
    – Preferujesz neutralne, wierne kolory ZEISS
    – Zależy Ci na najlepszym ekranie (2K, 144 Hz)

    Wybierz Xiaomi 17 Ultra, jeśli:
    – Fotografujesz głównie w terenie (IP68, lżejszy)
    – Cenisz kolory i atmosferę zdjęć Leica
    – Robisz dużo zdjęć nocnych (sensor LOFIC)
    – Zależy Ci na niższej cenie (od ~5295 zł)
    – Chcesz telefon dostępny od zaraz

    Comparison of Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra shows that there is no single winner — it is your winner, depending on whether you prefer the raw power of Vivo or the artistic character of Leica in Xiaomi.

    Looking for a case, tempered glass, or charger for your new flagship? Check out cases and glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra and wireless chargers at Home Screen – with free shipping from 100 PLN and a rating of 4.9/5 on Google.

    FAQ — frequently asked questions

    Will Vivo X300 Ultra be available in Poland?
    Vivo X300 Ultra is available for pre-order in Europe from April 16, 2026, with shipping starting from April 24. It can be ordered through the official Vivo website and selected retailers.

    What is the price of Xiaomi 17 Ultra in Poland?
    Xiaomi 17 Ultra costs around 5295 PLN (current market price) for the 16/512 GB version to about 6999 PLN for the 16 GB/1 TB version. The launch price was 6499 PLN. It has been available in Polish stores since March 2026.

    Which phone takes better photos?
    It depends on the photography style. The Vivo X300 Ultra camera wins in zoom range, resolution, and video recording. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra camera provides better night photos, warmer Leica colors, and better ultra-wide shots. For video — Vivo, for street and portrait photography — Xiaomi.

    Is it worth waiting for the Vivo X300 Ultra, since the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is already available?
    If your priority is video, extreme zoom, or dual 200 MP — yes, it’s worth waiting. If you care about immediate availability, IP68, a lighter design, and a lower price — the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a safe choice right now.

    When is the Vivo X300 Ultra release?
    The European pre-sale starts on April 16, 2026, and regular sales begin on April 24, 2026.

    What is the best camera smartphone in 2026?
    The Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra are the two main contenders for the title of best camera smartphone of 2026. Vivo leads in video and zoom, while Xiaomi excels in night photography and Leica colors. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and iPhone 17 Pro Max are strong competitors, but they do not have such advanced optical systems.

    What are the reviews of the Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
    The first reviews of the Vivo X300 Ultra highlight its outstanding video capabilities and record zoom range. Reviews of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra praise its night photography, Leica colors, and mechanical optical zoom.

  • New car — 5 elements you should wrap in film right away

    New car — 5 elements you should wrap in film right away

    Nowe auto najszybciej traci fabryczny wygląd w 5 miejscach: na progach drzwi, piano black wnętrza, wnękach klamek, ekranie multimedialnym i słupkach z krawędzią bagażnika. Folia ochronna na nowe auto chroni te elementy za 45 zł od zestawu i montujesz ją samodzielnie w 30–60 minut — to ułamek ceny renowacji zarysowanego lakieru w lakierni.

    Wiesz, co jest najgorsze w nowym samochodzie? Ten moment, gdy pierwszy raz zauważasz rysę, której wcześniej nie było. Na progu po wsiadaniu w butach, na piano black od rękawa kurtki, na klamce od pierścionka. Po paru miesiącach z eleganckiego wnętrza zostaje mapa mikrorys. Dobra wiadomość — większości tych problemów da się uniknąć, jeśli zadbasz o kilka kluczowych miejsc od razu po odbiorze auta.

    Dlaczego folia ochronna na nowe auto to konieczność?

    Nowe samochody mają więcej delikatnych powierzchni niż kiedykolwiek. Producenci oszczędzają na lakierach, stosują cienkie warstwy czystego lakieru (clear coat) i coraz więcej plastików piano black we wnętrzu. Efekt? Wystarczy kilka tygodni, by nowiutkie auto wyglądało na używane.

    Trzy powody, dla których warto nałożyć folię ochronną na nowe auto:

    • Ochrona wartości rezydualnej — auta z zabezpieczonym lakierem i wnętrzem osiągają o 10–20% wyższe ceny odsprzedaży
    • Oszczędność — renowacja progu w lakierni kosztuje 300–800 zł, folia na progi od 45 zł
    • Full reversibility — PPF (Paint Protection Film) comes off without a trace, does not affect the manufacturer’s warranty

    The best time to wrap is the first week after pickup — the elements are then perfectly clean, without scratches, and the film will preserve the factory condition for years.

    How does PPF protective film work on a new car?

    PPF (Paint Protection Film) is a multi-layer polyurethane (TPU) film with a thickness of 150–200 microns. The top layer is a self-healing topcoat that seals minor scratches when exposed to heat — just pour warm water on the film, and the small scratches disappear.

    Unlike films sold by the meter (which require professional cutting and installation), at homescreen.pl you will find ready-made GrizzGlass kits tailored to specific car models. Each element is precisely cut to the dimensions of a given car — Volkswagen Passat B9, Toyota Corolla, BMW Series 3, or Tesla Model 3 Highland. Installation takes 30–60 minutes and does not require detailing experience.

    5 elements of a new car that are worth wrapping with film right away

    Below you will find a list of the five most vulnerable elements along with ready-made solutions from the car accessories homescreen.pl offer.

    1. Door sills — most prone to scratches

    The most important element to protect in a new car

    Door thresholds are number one on this list — and there’s no doubt about it. Every time you get in and out, there’s contact with shoes, belt buckles, bags, and suitcases. After a month of daily use, the first scratches appear on the thresholds, and after a year, the surface looks like it has been sanded.

    GrizzGlass BodyShield films for thresholds are a carbon or matte laminate resistant to scratches, available in ready-made sets tailored to specific car models. They cover the entire visible area of the threshold — from the outer edge to the inner trim.

    What it protects:
    – Outer edge of the threshold (contact with shoes)
    – Inner threshold trim
    – Corners by the doors

    Cost: from 45 PLN for a set for one car model

    Alternative at the paint shop: 300–800 PLN for the renovation of one scratched threshold

    2. Piano black interior — scratches from just a glance

    Element number one for interior protection

    Piano black is the name of the glossy black finish on the plastic elements of the dashboard, center console, screen frames, and door trims. It looks fantastic — right until the first touch. The material has the awful characteristic of scratching from the slightest contact. Nails, sweater sleeves, and even dust particles wiped with a dry cloth leave visible marks.

    GrizzGlass PianoSkin is a set of precisely cut films tailored to a specific car model. Available in Glossy (maintains the original shine) and Matte (changes the finish to satin, which does not collect fingerprints).

    What it protects:
    – Central panel and center console
    – Multimedia screen frame
    – Door trims and gear shift lever cover
    – Dashboard elements

    Cost: from 112 zł per set

    Tip: The matte PianoSkin variant has an additional advantage — on the matte surface, fingerprints and minor scratches are practically invisible.

    If you want to know the details, read our full guide: Piano black in the car — how to protect against scratches.

    3. Handle recesses — invisible scratches that are visible up close

    Element najczęściej pomijany przez kierowców

    Wnęki klamek drzwi — przestrzeń wokół uchwytu, w którą wkładasz palce — to miejsce, które rysują paznokcie, pierścionki i kluczyki. Problem jest uniwersalny: niezależnie od modelu auta, po kilku miesiącach wokół klamek pojawia się matowa poświata drobnych zarysowań. Z daleka niewidoczne, z bliska psują wygląd drogiego samochodu.

    Folie GrizzGlass BodyShield na klamki to precyzyjnie wycięte elementy, które zakrywają dokładnie te fragmenty karoserii, które ulegają zniszczeniu. Transparentne, samoregenerujące się, nie wpływają na wygląd auta.

    Co chroni:
    – Wewnętrzna powierzchnia wnęki klamki
    – Krawędź drzwi wokół klamki
    – Same klamki (w wybranych zestawach)

    Koszt: od 35 zł za zestaw (komplet 2–4 klamek)

    4. Ekran multimedialny — coraz większy, coraz bardziej narażony

    An increasingly important element — screens are growing, and their replacement costs a fortune

    Screens in modern cars range from 8 to 24 inches diagonally and are often priced in the thousands of zlotys when replaced. The central display is touched daily — fingerprints, dust, scratches from jewelry are a daily occurrence. Some new cars have a protective glass, but most use plastic panels that scratch easily.

    GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection is available in two variants:

    VariantEffectFor whom
    CeramicMaintains full transparencyPeople who value the original appearance
    Matte (PaperScreen)Reduces glare, improves readability in sunlightDrivers often driving in the sun

    What it protects:
    – Central multimedia display
    – Digital clock / virtual cockpit (in selected models)
    – Air conditioning screen

    Cost: from 110 PLN for the screen film (110–220 PLN depending on size)

    5. B/C pillars and trunk edge — hidden areas that quickly get damaged

    The element you’ll think about only when you see scratches

    B and C pillars (between the doors and behind the rear doors) and the trunk edge are two areas that in new cars are painted with a high gloss or piano black finish. The problem? Passengers lean their bags against them, get in with dirty shoes, and the trunk collects scratches from suitcases, boxes, and groceries.

    GrizzGlass BodyShield for pillars and trunk edges covers these elements with a film that is practically invisible, protecting against scratches and chips.

    What it protects:
    – B pillar (between the driver’s door and the rear doors)
    – C pillar (behind the rear doors)
    – Trunk lid edge
    – Rear bumper (in some kits)

    Cost: from 45 PLN for a set for one car model

    Cost comparison — film vs paint shop

    Why is it worth investing in protective films right away? Here are the specific numbers.

    ElementFilm cost (DIY)Renovation at paint shopSavings
    Door sills (4 pcs.)45–120 zł1 200–3 200 złup to 3 080 zł
    Piano black interior112–430 zł500–1 500 zł (wrapping)up to 1 070 zł
    Handle recesses (4 pcs.)35–90 zł600–1 200 złup to 1 110 zł
    Multimedia screen110–220 złfrom 2 000 zł (replacement)up to 1 780 zł
    Pillars + trunk45–150 zł800–2 000 złup to 1 850 zł
    TOTAL345–1 010 zł5 100–9 900 złup to 8 890 zł

    Complete protection of a new car with film costs less than 1 000 zł with self-installation. A visit to the paint shop after a year of use — even 10 times more.

    Which car brands does GrizzGlass service?

    The kits are tailored for over 20 brands of cars and hundreds of specific models, including:

    MarkaLink do kategorii
    Volkswagen (Golf, Passat, Tiguan, ID.4)Folie VW
    Toyota (Corolla, RAV4, C-HR, Yaris Cross)Folie Toyota
    BMW (Seria 3, Seria 5, X3, X5)Folie BMW
    Tesla (Model 3, Model Y, Model S)Folie Tesla
    Kia (Sportage, EV6, Ceed, Niro)Folie Kia
    Hyundai (Tucson, Kona, Ioniq 5)Folie Hyundai
    Škoda (Octavia, Kodiaq, Superb)Folie Škoda
    Mercedes (Klasa C, GLC, Klasa E)Folie Mercedes
    Audi (A3, A4, Q5, Q7)Folie Audi
    Ford (Kuga, Focus, Puma)Folie Ford

    Nie widzisz swojej marki? Sprawdź kategorię folie do pozostałych aut — znajdziesz tam m.in. marki chińskie (Chery, Jetour), Volvo, Renault, Peugeot, Citroën, Fiat i wiele innych.

    Kiedy najlepiej okleić nowe auto folią?

    Odpowiedź: w pierwszym tygodniu po odbiorze. Powody są trzy.

    Firstly — the elements are then in perfect condition. No scratches, no fingerprints, no dust embedded in micro-cracks. The film will preserve the factory look and protect against scratches.

    Secondly — a new car usually sits in the garage for the first few days. You have time and peace for installation. Then routine sets in and constant postponement.

    Thirdly — later you will have to polish out scratches before wrapping, which takes extra time and requires experience. On a new car, installation is simpler and faster.

    Tip: Order the film kits even before picking up the car. They should be ready on the day you take the car from the showroom — you dedicate the first weekend to installation, and then enjoy your new car without worries about scratches.

    Summary

    A new car deserves protection from day one. Five elements worth wrapping in film right away are: door sills, piano black interior, door handle recesses, multimedia screen, and B/C pillars with the trunk edge. A complete film kit for all these places costs from 345 PLN with self-installation — that’s a fraction of the cost of later restoration at a paint shop, which can amount to even 10,000 PLN.

    Check the full offer of protective films for cars at homescreen.pl — ready sets GrizzGlass PianoSkin, BodyShield, and CarDisplay Protection for over 20 brands and hundreds of models. Free shipping for orders over 100 PLN and next-day delivery.

    FAQ — frequently asked questions

    Is it worth wrapping a new car with film?

    Yes, especially if you plan to use the car for more than 2 years. The protective film protects against scratches in the most vulnerable areas — thresholds, piano black, screen — and maintains the factory appearance for years. The cost of DIY kits (from 45 PLN per piece) is many times lower than later renovation at a paint shop.

    How much does it cost to wrap a new car with film?

    Complete protection of the five most important elements (thresholds, piano black, handles, screen, pillars) costs 345–1,010 PLN with self-installation of GrizzGlass kits. Professional wrapping at a detailing studio costs 3,000–8,000 PLN. The film for the entire body PPF costs from 6,000 PLN upwards.

    Can PPF film be applied independently?

    Yes — the GrizzGlass PianoSkin and BodyShield kits are designed for self-installation. The package includes precisely cut elements, mounting gel, a squeegee, microfiber cloth, and instructions. Installing one element takes 10–20 minutes and does not require detailing experience. A complete installation for the whole car takes about 1–2 hours.

    Does the protective film void the manufacturer’s warranty?

    No. GrizzGlass PPF films are fully reversible — they can be removed without a trace at any time. They do not affect the warranty on the paint or other car components. Additionally, they are invisible, so they do not alter the appearance of the car in the eyes of the insurer.

    Which parts of a new car scratch the most?

    The most commonly scratched areas are: door sills (when entering), piano black in the cabin (from sleeves and dust), door handle recesses (from nails and rings), multimedia screen (from fingers), and trunk edge (from suitcases and shopping). These five areas are worth protecting with film immediately after picking up the car.

    Can GrizzGlass films be used to wrap a Chinese brand car?

    Yes — at homescreen.pl you will find films tailored for models such as Chery Tiggo, Jetour X70, and other Chinese brands. Check the category films for other cars, where all brands outside the list of major European, American, and Japanese manufacturers are collected.

  • Vivo Pad 6 Pro – launch of the tablet with a 4K screen

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro – launch of the tablet with a 4K screen

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro is a flagship tablet with a 13.2-inch 4K display (3840 x 2512 px) with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) processor, and a 13,000 mAh battery with 66 W charging. It has 8 speakers with Super Audio 7.0, supports the Vivo Pencil 3 with 16,384 pressure levels, and a keyboard with a touchpad. Release date: March 30, 2026 (China), Europe 2026. Price starting from ~2500 PLN (8/256 GB).

    This is the most ambitious tablet Vivo has ever made — and the first one showcased at MWC 2026 in Barcelona aimed at the European market. The 4K display with a 3:2 aspect ratio, a VC cooling system with an area of over 71,000 mm², and up to 16 GB LPDDR5X RAM — everything points to a direct attack on the iPad Air and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE.

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro — tablet with 4K display front view
    Vivo Pad 6 Pro — tablet with stylus and keyboard from the back

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro technical specifications

    ParametrVivo Pad 6 Pro
    Wyświetlacz13,2″ IPS LCD, 3840 x 2512 px (4K), 144 Hz, Dolby Vision, 1200 nitów
    ProcesorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
    RAM / Pamięć8/256, 12/256, 12/512 lub 16/512 GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.1)
    Aparat tylny13 MP z LED flash
    Aparat przedni8 MP, 1080p
    Bateria13 000 mAh, ładowanie 66 W
    SystemAndroid 16 + OriginOS 6
    Audio8 głośników, Super Audio 7.0
    ŁącznośćWi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, USB-C 3.2
    Wymiary i waga297 x 199,8 x 6,2 mm, 663 g
    KoloryInspiration Purple, Relax Blue, Free Gray

    4K 144 Hz Screen — The Sharpest in Class

    The most important element of the Vivo Pad 6 Pro is the 13.2-inch IPS LCD panel with 4K resolution (3840 x 2512 pixels) with a 3:2 aspect ratio. The 144 Hz refresh rate and 540 Hz touch sampling ensure smoothness both when scrolling pages and drawing with a stylus.

    The peak brightness reaches 1200 nits, and the color accuracy with a Delta E value of ≈ 0.8 makes the tablet suitable for photo and video editing. The panel displays a billion colors in the P3 palette and supports Dolby Vision — movies look truly cinematic on it.

    Proporcje 3:2 to przemyślany wybór — w porównaniu z typowym 16:10 zyskujesz więcej miejsca w pionie, co docenisz przy pracy z dokumentami, przeglądaniu stron internetowych i rysowaniu. To ten sam stosunek boków, który stosuje Microsoft w Surface Pro.

    Warto wiedzieć: Vivo wybrało IPS LCD zamiast OLED — to oznacza brak ryzyka wypalenia ekranu i niższą cenę, ale też słabsze kontrasty przy wyłączonym świetle. Przy dziennym użytkowaniu różnica jest minimalna dzięki certyfikacji TÜV Rheinland dla niskiej emisji niebieskiego światła.

    Wydajność — Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

    Za wydajność odpowiada Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 — najmocniejszy procesor Qualcomma produkowany w procesie 3 nm. Rdzenie Oryon V3 Phoenix osiągają taktowanie do 4,6 GHz, a GPU Adreno 840 obsługuje nawet najbardziej wymagające gry mobilne w najwyższych ustawieniach.

    W benchmarku AnTuTu tablet osiąga wyniki na poziomie ponad 2 mln punktów — to klasa flagowych smartfonów i więcej niż jakikolwiek inny tablet z Androidem na rynku. Pamięć UFS 4.1 i LPDDR5X zapewniają błyskawiczny zapis i odczyt danych.

    System chłodzenia VC (Vapor Chamber) o powierzchni 71 446 mm² utrzymuje temperaturę pod kontrolą nawet podczas wielogodzinnych sesji gamingowych czy renderowania wideo. Do wyboru masz aż cztery warianty:

    • 8/256 GB — for multimedia and everyday work
    • 12/256 GB — optimal for most users
    • 12/512 GB — for content creators with a large file library
    • 16/512 GB — for professionals and power users

    The tablet runs on Android 16 with the OriginOS 6 overlay, which introduces floating windows, desktop mode, and a split screen activated by a two-finger gesture.

    Battery 13,000 mAh — up to two days of work

    The Vivo Pad 6 Pro is equipped with a 13,000 mAh battery — one of the largest in any tablet on the market. For comparison: the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE has 10,090 mAh, and the iPad Air has a battery capacity of ~36 Wh (~9500 mAh equivalent).

    In practice, this means:

    • Up to 13 hours of continuous video playback
    • Up to 78 days in standby mode
    • All day of intensive work with documents, browsing, and multimedia

    Ładowanie 66 W uzupełnia baterię w rozsądnym czasie — nie jest to rekord prędkości, ale przy pojemności 13 000 mAh to dobry wynik. Do ładowania potrzebujesz kabla USB-C i ładowarki sieciowej o mocy minimum 66 W.

    8 głośników i Dolby Vision

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro ma 8 głośników rozmieszczonych panoramicznie wokół obudowy — to dwa razy więcej niż w iPadzie Air czy Galaxy Tab S10 FE. Technologia Super Audio 7.0 symuluje dźwięk przestrzenny, a system automatycznie dostosowuje kanały stereo do orientacji tabletu.

    W połączeniu z ekranem 4K i obsługą Dolby Vision ten tablet zamienia się w przenośne mini-kino. Przy grubości zaledwie 6,2 mm i wadze 663 g wciąż da się go trzymać w rękach, choć na dłuższe seanse filmowe warto zaopatrzyć się w uchwyt lub podstawkę.

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro — tablet z klawiaturą w trybie pracy

    Rysik i klawiatura — tablet do pracy

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro obsługuje dwa kluczowe akcesoria (sprzedawane osobno):

    Vivo Pencil 3 — stylus z 16 384 poziomami nacisku, silnikiem liniowym imitującym opór papieru i podwójną końcówką (miękką i twardą). Ładuje się magnetycznie na obudowie tabletu i wytrzymuje około 15 godzin na jednym ładowaniu. Przycisk na korpusie pozwala przełączać tryby rysowania.

    Smart Touch Keyboard 6 Pro — klawiatura z pełnopowierzchniowym touchpadem, podłączana magnetycznie przez złącze pogo-pin. Regulowany kąt nachylenia do 140 stopni i dedykowany klawisz asystenta AI. W trybie pulpitu OriginOS 6 zamienia tablet w quasi-laptop z oknami aplikacji, paskiem zadań i obsługą myszy.

    Szukasz rysika do tabletu? W homescreen.pl znajdziesz rysiki do telefonów i tabletów od sprawdzonych marek — w tym modele kompatybilne z tabletami Vivo.

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro vs konkurencja

    ParametrVivo Pad 6 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEiPad Air M3 (13″)Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
    Wyświetlacz13,2″ 4K IPS, 144 Hz12,4″ TFT, 90 Hz13″ Liquid Retina, 60 Hz11,2″ LCD, 144 Hz
    ProcesorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Exynos 1580Apple M3Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
    RAM8–16 GB8–12 GB8 GB8–12 GB
    Bateria13 000 mAh10 090 mAh~9500 mAh8850 mAh
    Ładowanie66 W45 W30 W67 W
    Głośniki84 (AKG)46
    RysikPencil 3, 16 384 poziomyS Pen (w zestawie)Pencil Pro (osobno)Focus Pen (osobno)
    Cena (szac.)od ~2500 złod ~2200 złod ~5500 złod ~2000 zł

    Tablet Vivo wygrywa z konkurencją Androida rozdzielczością ekranu (jedyny 4K), pojemnością baterii (13 000 mAh) i liczbą głośników (8). Samsung odpowiada rysikiem S Pen w zestawie i lepszym wsparciem aplikacji w One UI. iPad Air M3 oferuje nieporównywalny ekosystem aplikacji, ale kosztuje ponad dwa razy więcej.

    Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro to najbliższy rywal cenowy — oferuje solidną specyfikację za ~2000 zł, ale z mniejszym ekranem 11,2 cala i niższą rozdzielczością.

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro cena i dostępność w Europie

    WariantCena (Chiny)Szacowana cena w Europie
    8/256 GB4499 CNY~2500 zł
    12/256 GB4999 CNY~2700 zł
    12/512 GB5799 CNY~3150 zł
    16/512 GB6699 CNY~3650 zł

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro premiera odbyła się 30 marca 2026 w Chinach, a sprzedaż ruszyła 3 kwietnia 2026. Tablet pokazano na MWC 2026 w Barcelonie, co potwierdza plany europejskiej dystrybucji — konkretna data i ceny dla Polski nie zostały jeszcze ogłoszone.

    Według portali GSMManiak i Tabletowo europejska premiera jest planowana na 2026 rok. GSMArena szacuje europejską cenę bazową na około 570 EUR.

    Gdy tablet Vivo trafi do polskiej sprzedaży, warto od razu zadbać o etui do tabletów Vivo Pad — aluminiowa obudowa wygląda premium, ale jest podatna na zarysowania i wgniecenia.

    Podsumowanie

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro is the most powerful Android tablet on the market in 2026 — 4K 144 Hz display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 13,000 mAh and 8 speakers in a body just 6.2 mm thick. With an estimated price starting from ~2500 PLN, it offers significantly more power and higher resolution than the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE, and costs less than half the price of the iPad Air 13″.

    If you’re looking for a tablet for work, entertainment, and drawing — and you’re not tied to the Apple ecosystem — this Vivo tablet should be at the top of your list. It’s worth keeping an eye on information about the European premiere.

    Check out Vivo tablet accessories at homescreen.pl →

    FAQ

    When is the Vivo Pad 6 Pro premiere in Europe?

    The tablet debuted in China on March 30, 2026, and was showcased at MWC 2026 in Barcelona. The European premiere is confirmed for 2026, but the specific date and prices have not yet been announced.

    How much does the Vivo Pad 6 Pro cost?

    The Vivo Pad 6 Pro price starts at 4499 CNY (~2500 PLN) for the 8/256 GB variant in China. The estimated base price in Europe is around 570 EUR. The 16/512 GB variant costs 6699 CNY (~3650 PLN).

    What kind of display does this tablet have?

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro has a 13.2-inch IPS LCD panel with a 4K resolution (3840 x 2512 pixels), a refresh rate of 144 Hz, a brightness of 1200 nits, and support for Dolby Vision. The aspect ratio is 3:2.

    Does Vivo Pad 6 Pro support a stylus?

    Yes — the tablet is compatible with Vivo Pencil 3, which offers 16,384 pressure levels, a dual tip, and magnetic charging. The stylus is sold separately.

    How does it differ from the iPad Air?

    Vivo Pad 6 Pro offers a 4K display (vs Liquid Retina), a refresh rate of 144 Hz (vs 60 Hz), a 13,000 mAh battery (vs ~9500 mAh), and 8 speakers (vs 4) — for less than half the price of the iPad Air 13″. The iPad wins with its app ecosystem and M3 processor.

    Is there a 5G version of the tablet?

    No — Vivo Pad 6 Pro is available only in a Wi-Fi version. No variant with 4G/5G cellular connectivity has been announced.

  • Vivo V70 and V70 FE – premiere in Poland, price and comparison

    Vivo V70 and V70 FE – premiere in Poland, price and comparison

    Vivo V70 to smartphone z procesorem Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, potrójnym aparatem ZEISS z peryskopowym teleobiektywem 3x i ekranem 5000 nitów — w cenie 3099 zł (promo 2699 zł). Vivo V70 FE oferuje sensor 200 MP, baterię 7000 mAh i obudowę świecącą w ciemności za 2099 zł (promo 1799 zł). Oba modele mają certyfikat IP68/IP69, ładowanie 90 W i Android 16.

    Vivo V70 i Vivo V70 FE trafiają do polskiej sprzedaży w 2026 roku jako jedne z najciekawszych propozycji w segmencie średniej półki. Oba modele łączy certyfikat IP68/IP69, szybkie ładowanie 90 W i system Android 16, ale poza tym to dwa zupełnie różne smartfony — skierowane do innych użytkowników.

    Vivo V70 stawia na aparat ZEISS z teleobiektywem peryskopowym i szybszą pamięć UFS 4.1. Model V70 FE (Fashion Edition) odpowiada baterią 7000 mAh, większym ekranem 6,83 cala i sensorem 200 MP — w niższej cenie. Który pasuje do Ciebie? Porównajmy.

    Vivo V70 vs V70 FE — key differences

    Before we get into the details, here are the key differences in one table:

    ParameterVivo V70Vivo V70 FE
    ProcessorSnapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm)Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm)
    Display6.59″ AMOLED, 5000 nits peak6.83″ AMOLED, 1900 nits
    Main camera50 MP ZEISS, f/1.9, OIS200 MP Samsung HP5, f/1.9, OIS
    Telephoto50 MP periscope, 3x zoom, ZEISSnone
    Ultrawide8 MP ZEISS8 MP
    Selfie50 MP AF, ZEISS32 MP AF
    Battery6500 mAh7000 mAh
    Charging90 W90 W
    MemoryUFS 4.1 + LPDDR5XUFS 3.1 + LPDDR5
    Video4K @ 60 fps4K @ 30 fps
    Weight187 g200 g
    ResistanceIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
    Price in Poland3099 zł (promo 2699 zł)2099 zł (promo 1799 zł)

    In short: V70 has a better camera and faster processor for a higher price. V70 FE offers a larger battery and screen for a thousand zł less.

    Vivo V70 specifications

    ParametrVivo V70
    Wyświetlacz6,59″ AMOLED, 1260 x 2750 px (1,5K), 120 Hz, HDR10+, 5000 nitów
    ProcesorQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm)
    RAM / Pamięć8/256 GB, 12/256 GB lub 8/512 GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.1)
    Aparat główny50 MP ZEISS, 1/1,56″, f/1.9, OIS
    Teleobiektyw50 MP ZEISS peryskopowy, 3x zoom optyczny, OIS
    Ultraszerokokątny8 MP ZEISS, f/2.2, 115°
    Aparat przedni50 MP ZEISS, f/2.0, AF, 92°
    Bateria6500 mAh (Si/C), 90 W
    SystemAndroid 16 + OriginOS 6
    Łączność5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, IR
    OdpornośćIP68 + IP69
    Wymiary i waga157,5 x 74,3 x 7,4 mm, 187 g
    KoloryGolden Hour, Alpine Gray

    Specyfikacja Vivo V70 FE

    ParametrVivo V70 FE
    Wyświetlacz6,83″ AMOLED, 1260 x 2800 px (1,5K), 120 Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nitów
    ProcesorMediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm)
    RAM / Pamięć8/256 GB, 12/256 GB lub 8/512 GB (LPDDR5 + UFS 3.1)
    Aparat główny200 MP Samsung HP5, 1/1,56″, f/1.9, OIS
    Ultraszerokokątny8 MP, f/2.2, 120°
    Aparat przedni32 MP, f/2.2, Eye AF
    Bateria7000 mAh (Si/C), 90 W
    SystemAndroid 16 + OriginOS 6
    Łączność5G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, IR
    OdpornośćIP68 + IP69
    Wymiary i waga163,7 x 76,2 x 7,6 mm, 200 g
    KoloryOcean Blue, Muse Purple, Titanium Silver

    Aparat Vivo V70 — ZEISS z zoomem czy 200 MP?

    To największa różnica między tymi modelami i jednocześnie najważniejsze kryterium wyboru.

    Vivo V70 oferuje potrójny system ZEISS z teleobiektywem peryskopowym 50 MP i 3-krotnym zoomem optycznym — coś, co w cenie poniżej 3500 zł praktycznie nie istnieje u konkurencji. Optyka ZEISS jest obecna we wszystkich czterech obiektywach (trzy z tyłu + selfie), a wideo nagrywa w 4K przy 60 kl./s z podwójną stabilizacją OIS + EIS. Teleobiektyw sprawdza się przy portretach, zdjęciach z koncertów i fotografii ulicznej — daje naturalną kompresję perspektywy bez cyfrowych artefaktów.

    Vivo V70 FE focuses on raw resolution — the Samsung HP5 200 MP sensor with a 1/1.56 inch matrix. In good light, photos are full of details, especially in cropped landscape shots. The 30x SuperZoom feature uses excess pixels for digital zooming, but the quality at higher zoom levels does not match the optical telephoto lens of the V70. There is also no separate telephoto lens and ZEISS branding.

    Additionally, there are AI features common to both models:

    • AI Night Mode — frame merging for night photos with noise reduction
    • AI Portrait — background blur with precise subject cutout
    • Scene Detection — automatic recognition of scene types

    Tip: If you often take photos from a distance (concerts, sports, children at the playground), the telephoto lens in the V70 is a game-changer. If you prefer cropping from large files or mainly take selfies and landscapes — the V70 FE will suffice.

    Performance — Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Dimensity 7360 Turbo

    Vivo V70 is powered by Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 — the latest Qualcomm chip manufactured using a 4 nm process. In the AnTuTu benchmark, it scores over 1.48 million points, placing it clearly above typical mid-range devices. The Adreno 722 GPU allows playing Genshin Impact and PUBG at high settings. The UFS 4.1 storage means faster file read and write speeds — applications launch noticeably smoother than on UFS 3.1.

    Vivo V70 FE features Dimensity 7360 Turbo — a solid but slower processor. In everyday use — browsing, social media, navigation — the difference is negligible. The gap widens in gaming and multitasking. The UFS 3.1 and LPDDR5 (without X) memory is from an earlier generation.

    Both models have a VC (Vapor Chamber) cooling system and run on Android 16 with the OriginOS 6 overlay. The manufacturer promises 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. Shared additional features include infrared port (IR), NFC, and Bluetooth 5.4 — the V70 adds Wi-Fi 7 to this.

    Bateria — 6500 vs 7000 mAh

    Both models use silicon-carbon (Si/C) cells, which are denser in energy than traditional lithium-polymer ones. The 90 W FlashCharge charges the battery from 0 to 100% in about an hour in both cases.

    V70 FE wins in capacity — 7000 mAh is one of the largest batteries in the segment. The portal GSMArena awarded a result of over 67 hours of endurance. With moderate use, that’s over two days without charging.

    V70 with a 6500 mAh battery also performs very well — it easily lasts a whole day of intensive use. The smaller capacity is compensated by a more energy-efficient Snapdragon processor and a smaller display.

    To charge both models, you need a USB-C cable and a wall charger with a minimum power of 90 W. For longer trips, it’s worth getting a power bank.

    Wyświetlacz Vivo V70 i V70 FE

    Both panels are AMOLED 1.5K with 120 Hz refresh rate and HDR10+, but they differ in details.

    V70 has a smaller screen 6.59 inches, but brighter — peak brightness reaches 5000 nits, which is a flagship-level result. Schott Xensation Core glass protects the display.

    V70 FE offers a larger screen 6.83 inches with a brightness of 1900 nits — still readable in sunlight, but the difference in direct comparison with V70 is noticeable. The 10-bit panel displays a billion colors in the P3 palette.

    Good to know: If you often use your phone outdoors, 5000 nits in V70 makes a huge difference in readability in full sunlight.

    Design and durability

    Vivo V70 is compact — 157.5 x 74.3 mm and only 187 g. The aluminum frame with a glass or plastic body (depending on the variant) makes it feel secure in hand. Available colors are Golden Hour (sunset gradient) and Alpine Gray.

    Vivo V70 FE is the Fashion Edition — 163.7 x 76.2 mm and 200 g. It features Darkness Glow technology: the rear panel in the Muse Purple variant absorbs light and glows in the dark, changing color. Ocean Blue has similar luminescent properties. Despite the 7000 mAh battery, the casing is only 7.6 mm thick.

    Both models have an IP68 + IP69 certification — complete dustproofing and resistance to immersion up to 1.5 m. IP69 indicates additional resistance to water under pressure — a rarity in this price range. Nevertheless, it is worth securing the device — cases and accessories for Vivo V protect the AMOLED display from scratches, which the IP certification does not help against.

    Price of Vivo V70 and V70 FE in Poland

    ModelRegular pricePromotional priceVariant
    Vivo V703099 zł2699 zł8/512 GB
    Vivo V70 FE2099 zł1799 zł8/256 GB

    The difference is one thousand zlotys — and this is the key question: is the ZEISS telephoto lens, faster processor, and brighter screen worth the additional 1000 zł?

    For comparison with the competition:

    ModelPrice in PolandHighlight
    Vivo V703099 złZEISS telephoto, Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
    Vivo V70 FE2099 zł200 MP, 7000 mAh battery
    Samsung Galaxy A56~1999 zł7 years of updates, One UI
    Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+~1599 zł200 MP, Dimensity 7400 Ultra

    According to the portal GSMManiak, both models are available in Polish stores (Media Expert, RTV Euro AGD, Neonet) with promotional starting prices.

    Which to choose? Vivo V70 or V70 FE

    Choose Vivo V70 if:
    – You take a lot of photos and need a telephoto lens (portraits, sports, concerts)
    – You care about the best gaming performance
    – You prefer a compact smartphone (6.59″, 187 g)
    – Screen brightness is important to you (5000 nits)

    Choose Vivo V70 FE if:
    – Battery life is a priority (7000 mAh)
    – You prefer a larger screen (6.83 inches)
    – You want to save 1000 PLN
    – You don’t need a telephoto lens — digital zoom from the 200 MP sensor is enough for you

    Our choice: For most users, Vivo V70 FE for 1799 PLN (on promotion) offers a better price-to-quality ratio. The telephoto lens on the V70 is great, but the additional 900 PLN is a significant expense if you’re not a photography enthusiast.

    Summary

    Vivo V70 and V70 FE are two thoughtfully designed smartphones targeting different needs. V70 is aimed at photographers — featuring a triple ZEISS camera with a 3x periscope telephoto lens and Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 for 3099 PLN. V70 FE focuses on durability — 7000 mAh, 200 MP sensor, and Darkness Glow casing for 2099 PLN.

    Both models share an IP68/IP69 rating, 90 W fast charging, Android 16, and solid build quality. Regardless of your choice, it’s worth taking care of protection — check out Vivo smartphone accessories at homescreen.pl.

    FAQ

    How much does Vivo V70 cost in Poland?

    The official price of Vivo V70 in Poland is 3099 PLN for the 8/512 GB variant. The promotional starting price drops to 2699 PLN. The V70 FE model costs 2099 PLN (promo 1799 PLN) for the 8/256 GB variant.

    What is the difference between Vivo V70 and V70 FE?

    V70 has a faster processor (Snapdragon 7 Gen 4), a triple ZEISS camera with a 3x periscope telephoto lens, and a brighter screen (5000 vs 1900 nits). V70 FE offers a larger battery (7000 vs 6500 mAh), a higher camera resolution (200 vs 50 MP), and a lower price.

    Does Vivo V70 have a telephoto lens?

    Yes — Vivo V70 has a 50 MP periscope telephoto lens with ZEISS optics and 3x optical zoom. It is one of the few mid-range phones with a telephoto lens in this price range. The V70 FE model does not have a telephoto lens.

    Which model has a better camera?

    It depends on the photography style. Vivo V70 wins in versatility — ZEISS telephoto lens, better 4K@60fps video, and ZEISS optics on all lenses. V70 FE offers a higher resolution of 200 MP, which provides more detail in good light and better digital zoom.

    Are Vivo V70 and V70 FE waterproof?

    Yes — both models have an IP68 rating (submersion up to 1.5 m) and IP69 (resistance to water under pressure). This is one of the highest resistance standards in the mid-range segment.

  • Best Controllers and Gamepads for Gaming — 2026 Ranking

    Best Controllers and Gamepads for Gaming — 2026 Ranking

    The best controllers and gamepads in 2026 are the GameSir G8 Galileo (279 zł) for mobile gaming, the GameSir SuperNova T4n Pro (199 zł) as a universal wireless gamepad for PC and Switch, and the GameSir G7 SE (219 zł) — the official pad for Xbox. All three have Hall Effect sticks that eliminate the drifting issue.

    We checked the full range of controllers from GameSir, in the category controllers and gamepads, from budget models for 74.90 zł to top-tier designs for nearly 300 zł. Below you will find a ranking of the 9 best gamepads for gaming divided into mobile, wireless, and wired controllers, a comparison of parameters, and specific recommendations based on needs.

    What to pay attention to when choosing a controller?

    The most important parameters are the type of sticks (Hall Effect vs traditional), type of connection (wired, Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz), polling rate, and compatibility with platforms. Below we discuss each of them so you can consciously choose a controller and gamepad suited to your needs.

    Type of connection

    • Wired (USB-C) — zero latency, no need for charging. Ideal for competitive gaming on PC and Xbox consoles.
    • Wireless (Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz) — convenience and mobility. Bluetooth works with phones and Switch, while the 2.4 GHz adapter provides a more stable connection with PC.
    • Mobilne (teleskopowe) — montowane bezpośrednio na smartfonie przez USB-C. Najlepsze do grania na telefonie.

    Drążki analogowe — Hall Effect vs tradycyjne

    Technologia Hall Effect wykorzystuje czujniki magnetyczne zamiast mechanicznych potencjometrów. Efekt? Drążki nie dryfują nawet po tysiącach godzin użytkowania. W 2026 roku praktycznie każdy porządny kontroler powinien mieć drążki Hall Effect — i wszystkie modele w naszym rankingu je posiadają.

    Polling rate (częstotliwość odświeżania)

    Im wyższa wartość, tym szybciej kontroler przekazuje dane do urządzenia. Standard to 125 Hz, ale topowe kontrolery oferują 1000 Hz — 8x szybsze raportowanie pozycji drążków i wciśniętych przycisków. Różnicę odczujesz przede wszystkim w grach FPS i bijatykach.

    ParametrOpisNa co zwrócić uwagę
    DrążkiHall Effect / tradycyjneHall Effect = brak dryfu
    TriggeryAnalogowe / cyfroweAnalogowe — lepsze do wyścigów
    PołączenieUSB-C / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz2.4 GHz — najniższe opóźnienia bezprzewodowo
    Polling rate125–1000 Hz1000 Hz — najszybsza odpowiedź
    Żyroskop6-osiowyPrzydatny na Switch i w celowaniu
    WibracjeJeden / dwa / asymetryczneAsymetryczne — najlepsza immersja

    Ranking najlepszych kontrolerów i gamepadów 2026

    Podzieliliśmy ranking na trzy kategorie, bo wybór kontrolera zależy od tego, na czym grasz. Każdy gamepad do grania testowaliśmy pod kątem ergonomii, responsywności i stosunku jakości do ceny. Poniżej znajdziesz 9 najlepszych kontrolerów i gamepadów dostępnych w Home Screen — od budżetowych modeli za 75 zł po topowe konstrukcje za blisko 300 zł.

    Kontrolery mobilne — najlepsze gamepady do telefonu

    Jeśli grasz na smartfonie, kontroler do telefonu montowany bezpośrednio na urządzeniu to najwygodniejsza opcja. Eliminuje opóźnienia Bluetooth i zamienia telefon w przenośną konsolę.

    1. GameSir G8 Galileo (279 zł) — najlepszy kontroler mobilny USB-C

    Kontroler mobilny GameSir G8 Galileo USB-C
    Kontroler mobilny GameSir G8 Galileo USB-C tył

    Our number 1 choice among mobile controllers. GameSir G8 Galileo combines the precision of 360° Hall Effect sticks with pass-through charging — you can play while charging your phone.

    • Sticks: Hall Effect with 360° precision
    • Weight: 252 g
    • Dimensions: 217 x 107 x 54 mm
    • Audio jack: 3.5 mm jack
    • Pass-through charging: yes
    • Triggers: analog

    G8 Galileo is a controller for demanding mobile gamers. The analog triggers perform well in racing games, and the compact dimensions (252 g) allow for long sessions without hand fatigue. The only caveat — it only works with USB-C devices.

    2. GameSir G8+ (279 zł) — universal Bluetooth controller

    Kontroler bezprzewodowy GameSir G8+ czarny
    Kontroler bezprzewodowy GameSir G8+ rozłożony

    GameSir G8+ is a controller for those who want to play on multiple platforms. Bluetooth 5.x and USB-C allow connection to Android, iOS, Nintendo Switch, and PC.

    • Sticks: Hall Effect (no drift)
    • Triggers: analog Hall Effect with rapid fire mode
    • Gyroscope: 6-axis
    • Battery: 1000 mAh (~8 h of gameplay)
    • Weight: 314 g
    • Additional: 2 programmable rear buttons, interchangeable magnetic panels

    G8+ has a wider grip (up to 210 mm) and works with virtually any phone — including iPhones. The 6-axis gyroscope is a bonus for the Nintendo Switch, and interchangeable magnetic panels allow you to personalize the controller’s appearance.

    3. GameSir X5 Lite (129 zł) — budget mobile controller

    GameSir X5 Lite USB-C mobile controller
    GameSir X5 Lite USB-C mobile controller in hand

    Looking for a phone controller, but 279 zł is too much? GameSir X5 Lite for 129 zł offers Hall Effect sticks and pass-through charging at a weight of just 135 g.

    • Sticks: Hall Effect (360°, no dead zones)
    • Waga: 135,4 g
    • Przyciski: membranowe z tłumikami dźwięku
    • Turbo: na przyciski A, B, X, Y, LB, RB, LT, RT
    • Kompatybilność: iPhone 15/16, iPad Mini, Android z USB-C

    Idealny wybór na początek przygody z graniem mobilnym. Membranowe triggery nie zastąpią analogowych w grach wyścigowych, ale do shooterów i RPG-ów sprawdzą się znakomicie.

    Bezprzewodowe kontrolery i gamepady do PC, Switch i konsol

    Bezprzewodowe kontrolery to najbardziej uniwersalna kategoria. Łączą się z PC, konsolami jak Nintendo Switch, telefonami i tabletami — często jednocześnie obsługują kilka platform.

    1. GameSir Cyclone 2 (249 zł) — topowy gamepad bezprzewodowy

    Kontroler bezprzewodowy GameSir Cyclone 2 czarny
    Kontroler bezprzewodowy GameSir Cyclone 2 widok z boku

    GameSir Cyclone 2 is the flagship wireless controller from GameSir. The Mag-Res TMR sticks provide zero dead zones, and the Hall Effect triggers operate smoothly and frictionlessly.

    • Sticks: Mag-Res TMR (zero dead zones)
    • Triggers: Hall Effect
    • D-pad: touch-sensitive
    • ABXY buttons: micro switches
    • Gyroscope: 6-axis
    • Battery: 860 mAh
    • Weight: 229 g
    • Platforms: Switch, Android, iOS, PC, Steam

    Touch D-pad i mikroprzełączniki pod przyciskami ABXY to cechy, które wyróżniają Cyclone 2 na tle konkurencji. Podświetlenie RGB to miły dodatek. Warto pamiętać, że nie ma dedykowanego trybu Xbox.

    2. GameSir SuperNova T4n Pro (199 zł) — premium w przystępnej cenie

    Kontroler bezprzewodowy GameSir SuperNova T4n Pro
    Kontroler bezprzewodowy GameSir SuperNova T4n Pro bok

    GameSir SuperNova T4n Pro oferuje technologię Hall Effect w drążkach i triggerach, polling rate 1000 Hz i żyroskop — wszystko za 199 zł. To jeden z najlepszych gamepadów do grania w tej cenie. Dostępny w wersji różowej i niebieskiej.

    • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, USB-C
    • Polling rate: 1000 Hz
    • Battery: 1000 mAh
    • Triggers: two-stage with adjustment
    • Additional: RGB lighting, interchangeable magnetic grips, programmable rear buttons

    A dedicated charging station with automatic start-stop (sold separately) is a convenient solution if you want to keep your controller always charged. The quality-to-price ratio is one of the best in this segment.

    3. GameSir Nova 2 Lite (119 zł) — best value

    GameSir Nova 2 Lite wireless controller
    Kontroler bezprzewodowy GameSir Nova 2 Lite tył

    For 119 zł GameSir Nova 2 Lite offers parameters that just two years ago were reserved for models costing 300+ zł — polling rate 1000 Hz, Hall Effect sticks and triggers, and three connection modes.

    • Polling rate: 1000 Hz (wired and wireless)
    • Connection: Bluetooth, USB-C, 2.4 GHz adapter
    • Triggers: Hall Effect with adjustable travel
    • Vibrations: asymmetric two motors
    • Weight: 225 g
    • Platforms: Switch, PC, Android, iOS

    Anti-slip grips with laser texture and two programmable rear macro buttons complete the package. Nova 2 Lite is a wireless controller that we recommend to gamers looking for solid equipment without overpaying.

    Wired controllers — the best pad for PC and Xbox

    A wired controller is the choice for gamers where every millisecond counts. Zero latency, no need for charging, and often a lower price than wireless counterparts. If you’re setting up a gaming station, check out our mice and keyboards.

    1. GameSir G7 SE (219 zł) — official Xbox controller

    Wired controller GameSir G7 SE Xbox
    Wired controller GameSir G7 SE Xbox rear view

    GameSir G7 SE is an officially licensed Xbox controller with Hall Effect sticks and triggers. Plug and play — no driver installation required.

    • Platforms: Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, Windows 10/11
    • Connection: USB-C (3 m cable)
    • Sticks and triggers: Hall Effect
    • Polling rate: 1000 Hz (PC mode)
    • Audio: 3.5 mm jack + microphone mute button
    • Weight: 221 g
    • Additional: 2 back buttons, Xbox Game Pass Ultimate trial

    If you are looking for a controller for PC or Xbox with a guarantee of compatibility — the G7 SE is a safe choice. The official Xbox license means full compatibility with every game on this platform.

    2. GameSir G7 HE (199 zł) — controller with interchangeable panels

    GameSir G7 HE wired controller white
    Kontroler przewodowy GameSir G7 HE widok z boku

    GameSir G7 HE is a controller with advanced Hall Effect sticks with a lifespan of 5 million cycles. The Hair Trigger mode allows for faster shooting in FPS games.

    • Platforms: Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, Steam, Windows
    • Cable: USB-C, 3 m
    • Sticks: Hall Effect (5 mln cycles)
    • Micro switches: 3 million presses
    • Vibrations: 4 motors (2 in grips + 2 in triggers)
    • Front panel: magnetic, replaceable

    Four vibration motors — two in the grips and triggers — provide exceptionally precise feedback of in-game events. The magnetic front panel can be replaced or even painted to your taste.

    3. GameSir T3 Tegenaria Lite (74.90 zł) — best budget controller

    Wired controller GameSir T3 Tegenaria Lite white
    Wired controller GameSir T3 Tegenaria Lite back

    For less than 75 zł GameSir T3 Tegenaria Lite offers Hall Effect sticks and a polling rate of 1000 Hz. At this price — it’s an absolute revelation.

    • Polling rate: 1000 Hz
    • Sticks: Hall Effect
    • Vibrations: asymmetric two motors
    • Platforms: Switch, Android, iOS, PC, Steam
    • Weight: 230 g
    • Additional: 2 rear buttons, turbo function, retro design

    Retro design inspired by the 90s is a matter of taste, but the ergonomics with laser texture grips work excellently. Membrane triggers are a compromise at this price — for racing, it’s better to choose G7 HE or G7 SE.

    Comparison of controllers and gamepads — summary table

    ModelTypCenaDrążkiPolling ratePlatformyBateria
    G8 GalileoMobilny USB-C279 złHall EffectAndroid, iOS (USB-C)
    G8+Mobilny BT279 złHall EffectAndroid, iOS, Switch, PC1000 mAh
    X5 LiteMobilny USB-C129 złHall EffectAndroid, iOS (USB-C)
    Cyclone 2Bezprzewodowy249 złMag-Res TMRSwitch, PC, Android, iOS860 mAh
    SuperNova T4n ProBezprzewodowy199 złHall Effect1000 HzSwitch, PC, Android, iOS1000 mAh
    Nova 2 LiteBezprzewodowy119 złHall Effect1000 HzSwitch, PC, Android, iOS600 mAh
    G7 SEPrzewodowy219 złHall Effect1000 HzXbox, PC
    G7 HEPrzewodowy199 złHall EffectXbox, PC, Steam
    T3 Tegenaria LitePrzewodowy74,90 złHall Effect1000 HzSwitch, PC, Android, iOS

    Which controller and gamepad to choose? Recommendations

    The best gamepad for gaming is the one that fits your gaming style and platform. Here’s a quick guide:

    • Do you mainly play on a phone with USB-C?GameSir G8 Galileo (279 zł) — the best sticks and pass-through charging.
    • Do you play on a phone and Switch?GameSir G8+ (279 zł) — Bluetooth works with any device.
    • Are you looking for a budget mobile pad?GameSir X5 Lite (129 zł) — Hall Effect for a small price.
    • Do you need a pad for PC and Switch?GameSir SuperNova T4n Pro (199 zł) — 1000 Hz and three connection modes.
    • Are you looking for a pad for Xbox?GameSir G7 SE (219 zł) — official license and plug-and-play.
    • Do you have a limited budget?GameSir T3 Tegenaria Lite (74,90 zł) — Hall Effect sticks for less than 75 zł.

    Don’t know what other gaming accessories you might need? Check out the full offer in the gaming category — from console cases to protective glasses for consoles.

    Summary

    GameSir controllers and gamepads in 2026 set new standards in terms of quality to price ratio. Hall Effect sticks, which were recently the domain of controllers costing 500+ PLN, can now be found even in a model for 74.90 PLN. Whether you’re looking for a mobile pad for your iPhone, a wireless gamepad for playing on Switch, or a wired controller for Xbox — in the Home Screen offer, you will find a model tailored to your needs and budget.

    Check out the full offer of controllers and gamepads at Home Screen — fast shipping with InPost and 14 days for returns.

    FAQ

    Which controller to choose for a phone?

    If your phone has USB-C, the best option is the GameSir G8 Galileo (279 PLN) or the budget X5 Lite (129 PLN). Both offer Hall Effect sticks and zero latency thanks to a wired connection. For iPhones with Lightning or older Androids, it’s better to choose the GameSir G8+ with Bluetooth.

    Are Hall Effect controllers better than traditional ones?

    Definitely. Hall Effect sticks use magnetic sensors instead of mechanical potentiometers, which eliminates the drifting problem — even after thousands of hours of use. Traditional sticks wear out mechanically and over time start registering movements without being touched.

    Does the GameSir G7 SE work with PS5?

    No — the G7 SE is an officially licensed Xbox controller and works only with Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, and PC (Windows 10/11). For PS5, you need a DualSense controller or a compatible third-party pad.

    What controller for Nintendo Switch?

    The best options are GameSir Nova 2 Lite (119 zł) and SuperNova T4n Pro (199 zł). Both have a 6-axis gyroscope, which is essential in many Switch games, and a dedicated connection mode for the Nintendo console. Check also accessories for Switch 2 if you plan to upgrade.

    How much does a good gamepad for PC cost?

    A good PC pad with Hall Effect sticks can be purchased for as low as 74.90 zł — the GameSir T3 Tegenaria Lite offers a polling rate of 1000 Hz and compatibility with Steam. If you want a wireless gamepad for gaming with full features, the SuperNova T4n Pro for 199 zł is an excellent choice.

    Does the mobile controller fit every phone?

    GameSir telescopic controllers support phones with a width from 105 to 213 mm (G8+). This fits practically every modern smartphone — from iPhone 15 Mini to Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Before purchasing, check the specifications of the specific model.