Category: Comparisons

Vivo X300 Ultra and OPPO Find X9 Ultra are the only smartphones with a dual 200 MP setup — but each implements this idea differently. Vivo focuses on ZEISS T* optics with gimbal stabilization and a 400 mm teleconverter, while OPPO counters with a triple optical zoom from Hasselblad (3× + 10×) and a 7050 mAh battery. Which one better replaces a compact camera? We compare them point by point.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra has its global premiere on April 21, 2026 — this is the first Ultra model in OPPO’s history to hit European markets. Vivo X300 Ultra has been available for pre-order in Europe since April 16. Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor and Sony LYT-901 main sensor, but differ practically in everything else.

Note: OPPO Find X9 Ultra had not yet officially premiered at the time of publication of this article. OPPO specifications are based on the manufacturer’s official announcements, certification entries (China Telecom), and reliable leaks.

Looking for accessories for the new flagship? Check out cases and glass for OPPO Find X9 and accessories for Vivo X phones at Home Screen.

Specifications Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Premiere	April 2026 (Europe)	April 21, 2026 (globally)
Screen	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3168), 144 Hz, ZEISS Master Color	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3120), 144 Hz, 3600 nits
Screen protection	Armor Glass	NanoCrystal Shield
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
RAM	12/16 GB LPDDR5X	12/16 GB LPDDR5X
Storage	256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1	256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1
Main camera	200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.85, OIS gimbal, ZEISS T*	200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.5, OIS, Hasselblad
Telephoto 3-4×	200 MP Samsung HP0 (1/1.4″), f/2.3, 85 mm, 3.7× periscope, ZEISS APO	200 MP OmniVision OV52A (1/1.28″), f/2.2, 70 mm, 3× periscope, Hasselblad
Telephoto 10×	none	50 MP Samsung JNL (1/2.75″), f/3.5, 230 mm, 10× periscope
Ultrawide	50 MP Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″), f/2.0, 116°, OIS	50 MP Sony LYT-600 (1/1.95″), f/2.0, 120°
Multispectral sensor	5 MP VCS 3rd generation	3.2 MP (color accuracy)
Selfie	50 MP, f/2.5, AF	50 MP, AF
Video	8K/30, 4K/120 10-bit Log (all lenses), APV 422, ACES, Dolby Vision	4K/120, 10-bit, Dolby Vision HDR
Battery	6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)	7050 mAh (silicon-carbon)
Wired charging	100 W	100 W SuperVOOC
Wireless charging	40 W + reverse	50 W AirVOOC + 10 W reverse
Dimensions	8.19 mm thickness	163.04 × 76.91 × 9.15 mm
Weight	232-237 g	235-238 g
Water resistance	IP68/IP69	IP68/IP69
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
NFC / IR	yes / yes	yes / yes
USB	Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort	Type-C 3.2
SIM	dual nano-SIM	dual nano-SIM
Fingerprint reader	ultrasonic, under the screen	ultrasonic, under the screen
Speakers	stereo, Hi-Res	stereo
System	Android 16, OriginOS 6	Android 16, ColorOS 16
Optical partnership	ZEISS	Hasselblad
Dedicated camera button	none	yes (Camera Quick Launch)
External teleconverter	ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra (17.4× zoom)	Hasselblad 300 mm
Satellite connectivity	yes (1 TB version)	yes (Satellite version)
Colors	black, silver, green	Polar Glacier, Sand Canyon, Earth Tundra
Price from (estimated)	~6500 PLN (pre-order)	~6000-7000 PLN (estimated, premiere 21.04)

The full specifications of both phones can be compared on GSMArena.

Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra — ZEISS vs Hasselblad

The camera of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the camera of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra are the two most ambitious photographic systems in smartphones of 2026. Both have a dual 200 MP setup, but differ in philosophy and zoom range.

Main camera — the same sensor, different approach

Both phones use the same Sony LYT-901 sensor (1/1.12″) — one of the largest in smartphones. The key difference lies in the optics:

Vivo X300 Ultra has a brighter telephoto lens with gimbal OIS stabilization and ZEISS T* certification (anti-reflective coatings). The f/1.85 aperture is a solid result.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra according to leaks goes further with an aperture of f/1.5 — it’s one of the brightest optics in smartphone history (some sources report f/1.8, official data will be revealed on April 21). A brighter lens means more light on the sensor, which translates to better photos in low light. Hasselblad calibration gives photos a characteristic, warm tone.

OPPO’s advantage in the brightness of the main lens (f/1.5 vs f/1.85). Vivo responds with gimbal stabilization, which can provide sharper images at longer exposure times.

Zoom – this is where the biggest difference lies

This is the key point of this comparison.

Vivo X300 Ultra has one 200 MP telephoto lens with 3.7× optical zoom (85 mm) and an optional ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter, which provides 17.4× optical zoom. In the range of 3.7-17×, it is the best zoom system in a smartphone — but the teleconverter is purchased separately.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra has two telephoto lenses: 200 MP 3× periscope (70 mm) and 50 MP 10× periscope (230 mm) — both built into the phone. You don’t need any accessories to achieve 10× optical zoom. Lossless zoom reaches up to 40-50× thanks to computations.

In the range of 3-5× both phones will deliver excellent photos from the 200 MP sensors. Above 5× OPPO has a built-in 10× zoom, while Vivo needs a teleconverter. But with the teleconverter, Vivo achieves 17.4× at full 200 MP — a range unavailable to any other smartphone.

OPPO wins in versatility (triple zoom without accessories), Vivo wins in maximum range (400 mm with teleconverter).

Ultrawide

Here Vivo X300 Ultra has a significant advantage. The Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″) sensor is much larger than the Sony LYT-600 (1/1.95″) in OPPO. Additionally, the ultrawide Vivo has its own OIS stabilization, which is lacking in OPPO.

A larger sensor and OIS clearly result in better ultrawide photos, especially in low light and when recording video.

Vivo X300 Ultra wins — the 1/1.28″ sensor with OIS is in a different league.

Night Photos

Both phones use the same main sensor, the Sony LYT-901, but OPPO has a brighter lens (f/1.5 vs f/1.85). In theory, this provides about 40% more light on the sensor, which should translate to better night photos from the main camera.

Vivo responds with gimbal stabilization OIS, which allows for longer exposure times without blur. In practice, both approaches yield great results at night.

Slight advantage for OPPO due to a potentially brighter lens — but the final aperture will be confirmed at the premiere, and the real difference in photo quality will only be visible after independent tests.

Video

Vivo X300 Ultra dominates in video:
– 4K/120 fps 10-bit Log on all lenses (main, tele, ultrawide)
– APV 422 encoding and ACES workflow
– 8K/30 fps, Dolby Vision HDR

OPPO Find X9 Ultra according to current information records 4K/120 fps with 10-bit color and Dolby Vision HDR. Log recording and 8K have not yet been confirmed by OPPO — the predecessor Find X9 Pro supported Log up to 4K/120 with ACES, so the Ultra model likely offers this as well. Full details will be revealed after the premiere on April 21.

Vivo wins video — 10-bit Log on every lens and APV 422 are professional tools. For stable video recording in motion, a tripod or gimbal for your phone will come in handy.

Screen – twin parameters

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Diagonal	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED
Resolution	1440 × 3168 (2K)	1440 × 3120 (2K)
Refresh Rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak Brightness	4500 nits (claimed)	3600 nits
Calibration	ZEISS Master Color	HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid
Protection	Armor Glass	NanoCrystal Shield

Both phones have nearly identical screens — 6.82″ LTPO AMOLED with a 2K resolution and a 144 Hz refresh rate. These are some of the best displays on the market.

Vivo claims a higher peak brightness (4500 vs 3600 nits) and offers ZEISS Master Color calibration — a bonus for photographers evaluating images on the screen. OPPO counters with HDR Vivid support and NanoCrystal Shield as screen protection.

Minimal draw — both screens are excellent. Vivo potentially has a brighter panel, but without independent tests, it’s hard to confirm.

Battery and Charging

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Capacity	6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)	7050 mAh (silicon-carbon)
Wired charging	100 W	100 W SuperVOOC
Wireless charging	40 W	50 W AirVOOC
Reverse charging	yes (wireless)	yes (10 W wireless)
Battery life	80% after 1200 cycles	no data

OPPO Find X9 Ultra features the latest silicon-carbon battery with a capacity of 7050 mAh — one of the largest batteries in flagship devices on the market. Vivo offers 6600 or 7000 mAh depending on the variant.

The wired charging is identical (100 W), but OPPO has better wireless charging (50 W AirVOOC vs 40 W on Vivo). Both phones support reverse charging.

OPPO wins with the battery — guaranteed 7050 mAh and faster wireless charging.

Planning to take a flagship on a longer trip? Check out smartphone power banks and wall chargers at Home Screen.

Build, weight, and water resistance

Both phones have IP68 and IP69 certifications — they can withstand immersion in water and a stream of hot water under pressure. Taking photos in the rain is not a problem.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra is slightly thicker (9.15 mm vs 8.19 mm for Vivo) and weighs 235-238 g. Available in three color variants with eco-leather: Polar Glacier (light blue), Sand Canyon (orange), and Earth Tundra (dark brown). It has a dedicated camera button (Camera Quick Launch) and a quick access button Plus Key.

Vivo X300 Ultra is slimmer (8.19 mm) and weighs 232-237 g. Available in black, silver, and green with an Armor Glass finish. Both phones have an infrared emitter (IR blaster).

Draw — Vivo is slimmer, OPPO has a more interesting design with eco-leather and a dedicated camera button.

Vivo X300 Ultra price vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra price

Variant	Vivo X300 Ultra	OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Base	~6500 PLN (pre-order with Pro Video set)	~6000-7000 PLN (estimated, premiere on 21.04)
Top	~8600 PLN (16 GB/1 TB)	no data
Teleconverter	ZEISS 400 mm (~2000 PLN)	Hasselblad 300 mm (price unknown)

The price of the Vivo X300 Ultra starts at 6500 PLN in pre-order with the Pro Video Rig Kit — this is the confirmed price. The price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet been officially announced and will only be revealed at the premiere on April 21, 2026. Based on the price of the OPPO Find X9 Pro (~5499 PLN in Europe), we estimate that the OPPO Find X9 Ultra will cost ~6000-7000 PLN, but this is just our estimation.

Both phones have dedicated photographic accessories — teleconverters (ZEISS 400 mm vs Hasselblad 300 mm) and grips with a battery.

The price of OPPO will be confirmed on April 21 — we will return with an update after the premiere.

Unique features – what distinguishes each model

Only Vivo X300 Ultra:

• ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra Teleconverter — 17.4× optical zoom in 200 MP
• 4K/120 10-bit Log on all lenses + APV 422 + ACES
• Ultrawide with 1/1.28″ sensor (Sony LYTIA 818) with OIS
• 5 MP multispectral sensor VCS 3rd generation
• Gimbal stabilization OIS (main camera)
• ZEISS Master Color screen calibration

Only OPPO Find X9 Ultra:

• Triple optical zoom (3× + 10×) — without accessories up to 230 mm
• Main lens f/1.5 — the brightest among flagships
• 7050 mAh battery — the largest in comparison
• 50 W wireless charging AirVOOC
• Dedicated camera button + Plus Key button
• Hasselblad Color Calibration on all lenses
• Hasselblad 300 mm teleconverter
• 5 years of system updates, 6 years of security updates

Summary: which one to choose?

Choose Vivo X300 Ultra if:
– You record professional videos (10-bit Log on every lens, APV 422)
– You need extreme zoom with a teleconverter (400 mm, 17.4×)
– You care about the best ultra-wide (1/1.28″ sensor with OIS)
– You prefer a slimmer design (8.19 mm)
– You want neutral, true-to-life colors from ZEISS

Choose OPPO Find X9 Ultra if:
– You want a triple zoom built into the phone (3× + 10× without accessories)
– You mainly photograph in low light (f/1.5 lens)
– You care about the largest battery (7050 mAh)
– You value warm, distinctive colors from Hasselblad
– You want a dedicated camera button

The comparison of Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra is a clash of two mobile photography philosophies — ZEISS vs Hasselblad, gimbal vs triple zoom, professional video vs versatility without accessories. There is no single winner — there is your winner.

Looking for a case, tempered glass, or charger for your new flagship? Check out accessories for OPPO Find X9, Vivo X accessories, and wireless chargers at Home Screen — with free delivery from 100 PLN and a rating of 4.9/5 on Google.

FAQ – frequently asked questions

When is the OPPO Find X9 Ultra premiere?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra premiere takes place globally on April 21, 2026. This is the first Ultra model in OPPO’s history to hit the European markets.

What is the price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra in Poland?
The price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet been officially announced. Based on the price of the OPPO Find X9 Pro (~5499 PLN), we estimate that the Ultra model will cost around 6000-7000 PLN. The official price will be revealed on April 21.

Will the OPPO Find X9 Ultra be available in Poland?
Yes — OPPO has confirmed the global premiere, including for the European markets. In Poland, OPPO is available, among others, through Media Expert. The exact date of availability in stores depends on the distributor.

Which phone takes better photos?
The Vivo X300 Ultra camera excels in video (10-bit Log on each lens, APV 422) and ultra-wide (1/1.28″ sensor). The OPPO Find X9 Ultra camera has an advantage in zoom (built-in 10× without accessories) and night shots (f/1.5 lens). Both have the same main sensor, the Sony LYT-901.

Which phone has a better battery?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has a 7050 mAh battery with 50 W wireless charging. The Vivo X300 Ultra has a 6600-7000 mAh battery with 40 W wireless charging.

What is the best camera smartphone in 2026?
The Vivo X300 Ultra, OPPO Find X9 Ultra, and Xiaomi 17 Ultra are the top three camera smartphones of 2026. Each excels in a different category — Vivo in video, OPPO in zoom, Xiaomi in mechanical optical zoom with Leica colors.

What are the opinions on the OPPO Find X9 Ultra?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet had its official premiere (April 21, 2026), so independent opinions and reviews will appear after this date. Its predecessor — the OPPO Find X9 Pro — ranked 5th in the DxOMark ranking, which bodes well for the Ultra model.

Vivo X300 Ultra has a dual 200 MP setup with ZEISS optics and a 400 mm teleconverter, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra features a 1-inch Leica sensor with a mechanical zoom of 75-100 mm. Both phones target photographers, but the philosophy of each is completely different — Vivo focuses on raw power and zoom range, while Xiaomi emphasizes the atmosphere of photos and hardware HDR. Which one better replaces a compact camera? If you’re looking for the best photography smartphone of 2026, the choice comes down to these two models.

Vivo X300 Ultra went on European pre-sale on April 16, 2026, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has been available since the end of February. They are direct competitors in the ultra-premium segment, united by one ambition: to replace the compact camera. However, they differ in philosophy, optics, and price.

Specifications Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Premiere	April 2026 (Europe)	February 2026 (globally)
Screen	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3168), 144 Hz, ZEISS Master Color	6.9″ OLED Xiaomi HyperRGB, 2608×1200, 120 Hz LTPO, 300 Hz touch, 12-bit
Peak brightness	4500 nits (declared)	3500 nits
Screen protection	Armor Glass	Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
RAM	12/16 GB LPDDR5X	16 GB LPDDR5X
Storage	256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1	512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1
Main camera	200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.85, OIS gimbal, ZEISS T*	50 MP Light Fusion 1050L (1″), f/1.67, OIS, LOFIC HDR
Telephoto	200 MP Samsung HP0 (1/1.4″), f/2.3, 85 mm, 3.7× periscope, ZEISS APO	200 MP Samsung HPE (1/1.4″), f/2.39-2.96, 75-100 mm mechanical zoom, OIS
Ultrawide	50 MP Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″), f/2.0, 116°, OIS	50 MP Samsung JN5 (1/2.75″), f/2.2, 14 mm, 115°
Multispectral sensor	5 MP VCS 3rd generation	none
Selfie	50 MP, f/2.5, AF	50 MP OV50M, f/2.2, AF, 21 mm, 90°
Video	8K/30, 4K/120 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision, APV 422	8K/30, 4K/120 Log, ACES, Dolby Vision, slow-mo 1080p/1920 fps
Battery	6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)	6000 mAh (global version)
Wired charging	100 W	90 W (~43 min)
Wireless charging	40 W + reverse charging	50 W
Reverse charging	yes (wireless)	yes (22.5 W wired)
Dimensions	8.19 mm thick	162.9 × 77.6 × 8.29 mm
Weight	232-237 g (depending on color)	218.4 g (Black/White) / 219 g (Green)
Water resistance	IP68/IP69	IP68
Bluetooth	5.4	6.0
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7 (tri-band, Wi-Fi 6e)
NFC	yes	yes
Infrared port (IR)	yes	yes
USB	Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort	Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort
SIM	dual nano-SIM	nano+nano or nano+eSIM or eSIM+eSIM
Fingerprint reader	ultrasonic, under display	ultrasonic, under display
Speakers	stereo, Hi-Res	stereo, Hi-Res
System	Android 16, OriginOS 6	Android 16, HyperOS 3
DxOMark	not yet rated	166 points (#6 globally)
Satellite connectivity	yes (1 TB version)	none
Colors	black, silver, green	black, white, green (Starlit Green)
Price from	approx. 7999 PLN for the 16 GB/1 TB variant	approx. 6499

The full specifications of both phones can also be compared on GSMArena. Looking for accessories for your new flagship? Check out cases and glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra and accessories for Vivo X phones at Home Screen.

Camera Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra — which one takes better photos?

This is where the real fun begins — the camera of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the camera of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra approach mobile photography from completely different angles.

Camera Philosophy

Vivo X300 Ultra is a “technologist” — it focuses on raw specification power. The dual 200 MP sensor (main Sony LYT-901, f/1.85 + telephoto Samsung HP0, f/2.3) provides a huge field for framing and digital zooming. OIS stabilization at gimbal level and ZEISS T* certification on the main lens are parameters rarely seen in smartphones. Additionally, the ultra-wide lens with a large Sony LYTIA 818 sensor (1/1.28″) — significantly larger than the competition.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra is an “artist” — a 1-inch main sensor with LOFIC technology (hardware HDR without frame merging) and a mechanical optical zoom of 75-100 mm are solutions known from professional cameras. Collaboration with Leica translates into characteristic color reproduction and emulation of Leica M9 films.

Daytime photo quality

In good lighting, Vivo X300 Ultra produces more neutral, true-to-life colors. Photos from the 200 MP sensor have an enormous amount of detail — when cropped to a lower resolution, the effect is incredibly sharp.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra with a 1-inch sensor captures more light and creates a more natural background blur (bokeh). Colors in Leica Vibrant mode are warmer and more saturated, while in Leica Authentic mode — truer, with the characteristic “leica look”.

Draw. Vivo wins in detail and resolution, Xiaomi — in atmosphere and color reproduction. The choice depends on the photography style.

Night mode photos

Here, Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a clear advantage. The 1-inch sensor with LOFIC technology processes exposure information at the hardware level, resulting in more balanced night photos without the typical artifacts from merging multiple frames.

Vivo X300 Ultra performs well thanks to CIPA 7.0 stabilization, which allows for longer exposure times without blurring. In practice, both phones deliver excellent results at night, but Xiaomi retains more detail in shadows and better controls noise.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins — the LOFIC sensor is a real advantage in low light.

Zoom and telephoto lens

This is the key difference between the two phones.

Vivo X300 Ultra offers a 200 MP telephoto lens with a focal length of 85 mm (3.7× optical zoom). Additionally, there is an optional ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter, which provides up to 17.4× optical zoom at full 200 MP resolution. This is a record among smartphones.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a 200 MP telephoto lens with mechanical optical zoom of 75-100 mm (3.2-4.3×). This is the first such solution in a smartphone — a movable optical element provides true optical zoom without quality loss across the entire focal range.

At close-ups of 3-5×, Xiaomi delivers sharper images because it uses optical zoom without digital cropping. Above 5×, Vivo takes the lead — with the teleconverter, it achieves ranges unavailable to any other smartphone.

Vivo wins in range, Xiaomi — in photo quality in the popular 3-5× range. The ZEISS teleconverter is a powerful accessory, but you buy it separately.

If you plan to record professional video on your smartphone, a tripod or gimbal for your phone. will also be useful.

Ultrawide

Both phones have 50 MP ultrawide lenses with similar fields of view (~116°), but the Vivo X300 Ultra has a huge advantage with its 1/1.28″ Sony LYTIA 818 sensor — that’s more than twice the size of the Samsung JN5 (1/2.75″) in the Xiaomi. Additionally, the ultrawide Vivo has its own OIS stabilization.

In practice, the Vivo X300 Ultra should provide significantly better ultrawide photos, especially in low light, thanks to the larger sensor and stabilization.

The Vivo X300 Ultra wins — the 1/1.28″ sensor with OIS is in a completely different league than the 1/2.75″ without stabilization.

Video

Both phones record in 8K/30 fps, 4K/120 fps Log with support for ACES and Dolby Vision — this is currently the absolute top of smartphone video. The differences lie in the details:

Vivo X300 Ultra:
– 4K/120 fps 10-bit Vivo Log on all lenses (main, tele, ultra-wide)
– Encoding APV 422 (more efficient format than H.265)
– Dolby Vision HDR, 8K/30 fps

Xiaomi 17 Ultra:
– 4K/120 fps Log with ACES support (Academy Color Encoding System)
– Super slow-motion 1080p up to 1920 fps
– Leica film modes (warm color rendition)
– ShootSteady recording up to 2.8K/60 fps (advanced stabilization)
– Dolby Vision HDR, 8K/30 fps

Both of these machines offer professional video tools — Log, ACES, and 4K/120. The key advantage of Vivo is 10-bit Log on every lens (not just the main one) and APV 422 encoding. Xiaomi, on the other hand, offers super slow-motion 1080p/1920 fps and ShootSteady stabilization — ideal for dynamic shots in motion.

Tie in video — both phones are professional filmmaking tools. Vivo has better encoding (APV 422) and Log on all lenses, Xiaomi has better slow-motion and stabilization. For stable video recording in motion, a selfie stick with tripod function will also work well.

Screen — does 2K resolution make a difference?

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Diagonal	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED	6.9″ OLED Xiaomi HyperRGB
Resolution	1440 × 3168 (2K)	2608 × 1200, 12-bit
Refresh Rate	144 Hz	120 Hz LTPO
Peak Brightness	4500 nits (claimed)	3500 nits
Calibration	ZEISS Master Color	DCI-P3, TUV Rheinland
Protection	Armor Glass	Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0

Vivo leads in all screen parameters — 2K vs FHD+, 144 Hz vs 120 Hz, and 4500 nits peak brightness (claimed) vs 3500 nits from Xiaomi. ZEISS Master Color calibration is an additional bonus for photographers who want to evaluate photos directly on the phone’s screen.

Xiaomi counters with adaptive LTPO refresh rate, which saves battery by lowering the frequency to 1 Hz when sufficient. The Xiaomi screen offers 12-bit color depth and TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

Vivo wins with the screen — higher resolution, faster refresh rate, and brighter panel. Xiaomi counters with better color depth (12-bit) and eye protection certifications.

Battery and Charging — Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Capacity	6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)	6000 mAh
Wired charging	100 W	90 W (~43 min)
Wireless charging	40 W + reverse charging	50 W
Reverse charging	yes (wireless)	yes (10 W wireless, 22.5 W wired)
Battery life	80% after 1200 cycles	no data

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a significantly larger battery — 6600 or even 7000 mAh (depending on the variant) with a silicon-carbon cell, compared to 6000 mAh in the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Faster wired charging (100 W vs 90 W) is an additional advantage. In tests, EPREL showed that Vivo achieved about 57 hours of operation, placing it among the top smartphones. Both phones support reverse charging — you can charge headphones, a watch, or even a second phone with them.

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra has better wireless charging (50 W vs 40 W) and stronger wired reverse charging (22.5 W). In everyday use, both phones easily last a full day of intensive photography.

Vivo wins in battery capacity (even 1000 mAh more), Xiaomi in wireless and reverse charging.

Planning to take your flagship on a longer trip? Check out smartphone power banks and wall chargers to ensure that the battery doesn’t die at a crucial moment.

Build, weight, and water resistance

You will take both phones in your hand and feel the difference — Xiaomi is about 13-19 g lighter. With similar dimensions (~163 × 77 × 8.2-8.3 mm), every gram matters during long photography sessions.

Vivo X300 Ultra has IP68 and IP69 certifications — it can withstand immersion in water and a stream of hot water under pressure. Xiaomi 17 Ultra has an IP68 certification (immersion up to 6 m for 30 minutes). Taking photos in the rain or near water is not a problem for either of them.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra weighs 218.4 g (Black/White) or 219 g (Starlit Green). Available in three colors: black, white, and green. Both phones have an infrared emitter (IR blaster) for controlling home appliances.

Vivo X300 Ultra weighs 232-237 g (the black is lighter, the green is heavier) and has Armor Glass on the back. The construction is massive but solid — the aluminum frame and flat edges provide a secure grip. Available in black, silver, and green.

Vivo wins with IP protection (IP68+IP69 vs just IP68), but Xiaomi wins with weight — it is noticeably lighter.

Price in Poland — how much does each flagship cost?

The launch price of Xiaomi 17 Ultra was 6499 PLN for the 16/512 GB version, but it can currently be purchased from 5295 PLN. The official prices for this model in Poland have not yet been announced, but leaks suggest that Vivo X300 Ultra may cost around 7999 PLN for the 16 GB / 1 TB version.

Both phones have dedicated photography grips (Xiaomi Photography Kit, SmallRig Kit for Vivo), but you buy them separately. The ZEISS 400 mm teleconverter is a unique accessory that has no equivalent among competitors. The quality-to-price ratio favors Xiaomi — but Vivo with the pre-sale set levels the playing field.

Unique features — what distinguishes each model

Only Vivo X300 Ultra:

• ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter — 17.4× optical zoom in 200 MP
• Dual sensor 200 MP (main + telephoto) with ZEISS T* optics
• 4K/120 10-bit Vivo Log on all lenses + ACES workflow
• Ultrawide with 1/1.28″ sensor (Sony LYTIA 818) with OIS
• 5 MP multispectral sensor VCS 3rd generation
• 6600/7000 mAh battery (silicon-carbon)
• ZEISS Master Color screen calibration
• BeiDou satellite connectivity (1 TB version)
• Infrared port (IR blaster)
• OIS gimbal stabilization

Only Xiaomi 17 Ultra:

• Mechanical optical zoom 75-100 mm (first in a smartphone)
• 1-inch sensor with LOFIC (hardware HDR)
• Leica film modes (Leica Authentic, Leica Vibrant, film filters)
• Super slow-motion 1080p/1920 fps
• ShootSteady stabilization up to 2.8K/60 fps
• Bluetooth 6.0 and Wi-Fi 6e (tri-band)
• Support for eSIM (nano+eSIM or eSIM+eSIM)
• DxOMark 166 points (#6 globally)
• Xiaomi HyperAI (writing AI, translating AI, searching AI)

Summary: which one to choose?

Choose Vivo X300 Ultra if:
– You record a lot of video (8K and 4K/120 Log is a huge advantage over the competition)
– You need extreme zoom (400 mm with a teleconverter)
– You want maximum photo resolution (dual 200 MP)
– You prefer neutral, true-to-life colors from ZEISS
– You care about the best display (2K, 144 Hz)

Choose Xiaomi 17 Ultra if:
– You mainly photograph outdoors (IP68, lighter)
– You value the colors and atmosphere of Leica photos
– You take a lot of night shots (LOFIC sensor)
– You care about a lower price (from ~5295 PLN)
– You want a phone available immediately

The comparison of Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra shows that there is no single winner — it is your winner, depending on whether you prefer the raw power of Vivo or the artistic character of Leica in Xiaomi.

Looking for a case, tempered glass, or charger for your new flagship? Check out cases and glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra and wireless chargers at Home Screen – with free delivery from 100 PLN and a rating of 4.9/5 on Google.

FAQ — frequently asked questions

Will Vivo X300 Ultra be available in Poland?
Vivo X300 Ultra is available for pre-order in Europe since April 16, 2026, with shipping starting from April 24. It can be ordered through the official Vivo website and selected retailers.

What is the price of Xiaomi 17 Ultra in Poland?
Xiaomi 17 Ultra costs around 5295 PLN (current market price) for the 16/512 GB version up to about 6999 PLN for the 16 GB/1 TB version. The launch price was 6499 PLN. It has been available in Polish stores since March 2026.

Which phone takes better photos?
It depends on the photography style. The camera of Vivo X300 Ultra wins in zoom range, resolution, and video recording. The camera of Xiaomi 17 Ultra provides better night photos, warmer Leica colors, and better ultra-wide shots. For video — Vivo, for street and portrait photography — Xiaomi.

Is it worth waiting for the Vivo X300 Ultra, since the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is already available?
If your priority is video, extreme zoom, or dual 200 MP — yes, it’s worth the wait. If you care about immediate availability, IP68, a lighter design, and a lower price — the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a safe choice right now.

When is the Vivo X300 Ultra release?
European pre-sales start on April 16, 2026, and regular sales begin on April 24, 2026.

What is the best camera smartphone in 2026?
The Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra are the two main contenders for the title of best camera smartphone of 2026. Vivo leads in video and zoom, while Xiaomi excels in night photography and Leica colors. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and iPhone 17 Pro Max are strong competitors, but they do not have such advanced optical systems.

What are the reviews of the Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The first reviews of the Vivo X300 Ultra highlight its outstanding video capabilities and record zoom range. Reviews of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra praise its night photography, Leica colors, and mechanical optical zoom.

Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro — Phone 4a Pro wins with a 144 Hz display with a brightness of 5000 nits, a Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 processor (even twice as powerful GPU), and a completely new Glyph Matrix with 137 mini-LEDs. However, it loses the iconic transparent back for an aluminum casing and has a weaker selfie camera (32 MP instead of 50 MP). In Poland, the surcharge is about 350 PLN compared to the launch price of the 3a Pro.

Nothing Phone 4a Pro debuted on March 5, 2026 — exactly one year after the Phone 3a Pro, which premiered during MWC 2025. The first reviews from critics are positive, but the comparison of both generations reveals not only progress — but also a surprising step backward.

Looking for a case or tempered glass? In our store, you will find accessories for Nothing Phone 4a Pro and Nothing Phone 3a Pro.

Key differences — Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro at a glance

Feature	Phone 4a Pro (2026)	Phone 3a Pro (2025)
Processor	Snapdragon 7 Gen 4	Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
Display	6.83″ / 144 Hz / 5000 nits	6.77″ / 120 Hz / 3000 nits
Telephoto	50 MP, 3.5x optical zoom	50 MP, 3x optical zoom
Selfie Camera	32 MP	50 MP
Battery	5080 mAh	5000 mAh
Glyph	137 mini-LEDs (matrix)	3 LED strips, 26 zones
Body	Aluminum (unibody)	Glass (transparent) + plastic
Protection	Gorilla Glass 7i, IP65	Panda Glass, IP64
Price (PL)	from 2099 PLN (8/128 GB)	from ~1300 PLN (sales)

Full specification — Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro

Parameter	Phone 4a Pro	Phone 3a Pro
Release	March 2026	March 2025
Dimensions	163.7 × 76.6 × 8.0 mm	163.5 × 77.5 × 8.4 mm
Weight	210 g	211 g
Display	6.83″ AMOLED, 1260 × 2800 px (440 ppi)	6.77″ AMOLED, 1080 × 2392 px (387 ppi)
Refresh Rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
PWM	2160 Hz	2160 Hz
Peak Brightness	5000 nits	3000 nits
Processor	Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm)	Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPU	Adreno 722	Adreno 810
RAM	8 / 12 GB LPDDR5X	8 / 12 GB
Storage	128 / 256 GB (UFS 3.1)	128 / 256 GB
Main Camera	50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56″	50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56″
Telephoto	50 MP, f/2.9, 3.5× zoom, OIS	50 MP, f/2.6, 3× zoom, OIS
Ultrawide	8 MP, f/2.2, 120°	8 MP, f/2.2, 120°
Selfie Camera	32 MP, f/2.2	50 MP, f/2.2
Video	4K 30 fps, Ultra XDR / Dolby Vision	4K 30 fps
Battery	5080 mAh	5000 mAh
Charging	50 W (100% in 64 min)	50 W (100% in 56 min)
Wireless Charging	No	No
System	Android 16 / Nothing OS 4.1	Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 (update to Android 16)
Updates	3 years Android + 6 years security	3 years Android + 6 years security
5G	Yes	Yes
WiFi	WiFi 6	WiFi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
IP	IP65	IP64
Colors	Black, Silver, Pink	Black, Gray

You can check the official specifications from the manufacturer at nothing.tech.

Display — 5000 vs 3000 nits and higher refresh rate

The screen is one of the most noticeable changes when comparing Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro.

The Phone 4a Pro received a larger 6.83-inch panel (vs 6.77″) with a higher resolution — 1260 × 2800 px gives 440 ppi instead of 387 ppi. Text and small interface elements look clearer. The refresh rate increased from 120 Hz to 144 Hz. You will notice the difference mainly in games and fast scrolling through lists.

The biggest change concerns brightness. 5000 nits in the Phone 4a Pro is 67% more than 3000 nits in the 3a Pro. This has a real impact on screen readability in bright sunlight — while running, cycling, or navigating the city in summer.

Nothing also applied Corning Gorilla Glass 7i instead of Panda Glass, which means better scratch resistance. You can find the full specifications of the Nothing Phone 4a Pro display in the table above. If you still prefer additional protection, tempered glass for Nothing smartphones is available in our store.

💡 Tip: If you mainly use your phone indoors, the difference in brightness will be less noticeable. 3000 nits in the 3a Pro is still an excellent result — better than many flagship devices from 2024.

Design and materials — the end of transparency

This is the most controversial change. The Nothing Phone 4a Pro abandons the iconic transparent back for an aluminum unibody case. This is the first Nothing phone with a metal construction.

What does this mean in practice?

• Materials — 4a Pro: aluminum (frame and back) + Gorilla Glass 7i (front). 3a Pro: plastic frame + glass transparent back + Panda Glass (front).
• Premium feeling — aluminum gives the impression of a more expensive phone. Reviewers compare it to higher-end devices.
• Weight and dimensions — practically identical (210 vs 211 g). The Phone 4a Pro is thinner by 0.4 mm and narrower by almost a millimeter.
• Water resistance — IP65 (resistance to water jets) vs IP64 (resistance to splashes). A small but real improvement.
• Colors — 4a Pro offers three options (Black, Silver, Pink), 3a Pro two (Black, Gray).

⚠️ Note: If a transparent design is a key feature for you, Nothing — Phone 3a Pro is the last model in the “a” series that offers it. Phone 4a Pro looks more “mainstream,” which may not appeal to everyone.

Performance — Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs 7s Gen 3

Under the hood, Phone 4a Pro hides the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the 3a Pro has the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. The difference is significant:

• CPU — about 15% faster single-core, about 32% faster multi-core in Phone 4a Pro
• GPU — Adreno 722 in 4a Pro is even twice as efficient as Adreno 810 in 3a Pro
• RAM — both offer 8 and 12 GB LPDDR5X variants

What does this mean in everyday use? The Phone 3a Pro is still a smooth phone — Nothing OS is well optimized. You will mainly feel the difference in:

• Gaming — higher frames per second, more stable framerate in Genshin Impact, Call of Duty Mobile
• Photo and video editing — export about 30% faster
• Multitasking — more open apps without reloading

Both phones have UFS 3.1 memory — the lack of UFS 4.0 is a certain compromise, but in practice, the difference is mainly felt when copying large files.

Camera — better zoom, but weaker selfies

The main camera in both phones is identical — 50 MP, f/1.9, 1/1.56″ sensor with OIS. The ultrawide is also unchanged (8 MP, f/2.2). Key differences concern the telephoto lens and the selfie camera.

Telephoto lens

Parameter	Phone 4a Pro	Phone 3a Pro
Resolution	50 MP	50 MP
Optical zoom	3.5× (80 mm)	3× (70 mm)
Aperture	f/2.9	f/2.6
Sensor	Samsung JN5, 1/2.75″	1/1.95″
Digital zoom	up to 140×	no data

Phone 4a Pro offers a longer zoom (3.5× vs 3×), which is useful for photographing distant objects. It also features in-sensor zoom up to 7× and digital zoom up to 140×. But beware — the telephoto sensor is smaller (1/2.75″ vs 1/1.95″), which may result in poorer zoom photos in low light.

There is also a new TrueLens Engine 4 — multi-frame RAW processing with 12-layer AI segmentation. Video has gained an Ultra XDR mode (similar to Dolby Vision HDR).

Selfie camera — a step back

This is the only clear downgrade in the Phone 4a Pro:

• 3a Pro: 50 MP, 1/2.76″ sensor — one of the better selfie cameras in the segment
• 4a Pro: 32 MP, 1/3.42″ sensor — smaller sensor, lower resolution, no 4K in video

If you often take selfies, record TikToks, or have video calls, the 3a Pro has an objective advantage here.

Battery and charging — Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro

Parameter	Phone 4a Pro	Phone 3a Pro
Capacity	5080 mAh	5000 mAh
Charging	50 W	50 W
0–50%	22 min	19 min
0–100%	64 min	56 min
Endurance rating (GSMArena)	63:24h	43:17h
Wireless charging	No	No
Reverse charging	7.5 W (wired)	No

Phone 4a Pro has a slightly larger battery (5080 vs 5000 mAh), but achieves a significantly better endurance rating according to GSMArena — 63:24h vs 43:17h. This suggests that the new processor and display are more energy-efficient. Paradoxically, a full charge takes longer (64 vs 56 min) despite the identical power of 50 W.

A new feature is reverse charging at 7.5 W — you can charge headphones or a smartwatch with a cable from Phone 4a Pro.

💡 Tip: Neither model supports wireless charging. If this is important to you, consider alternatives like OnePlus 13 or Google Pixel.

Glyph Interface — 137 LEDs vs 26 zones

Glyph Interface is the hallmark of Nothing, and here the difference between generations is huge.

Phone 3a Pro had 3 LED strips with 26 addressable zones arranged around the camera module. They were mainly used for notifications, charging indicators, and illuminating photos.

Phone 4a Pro introduces a completely new Glyph Matrix — 137 individually controllable mini-LEDs with a brightness of up to 3000 nits. These are no longer strips — this is a pixel matrix that displays:

• Pixel-style icons and animations
• Digital clock
• Battery level indicator
• Moon phase and sun position
• Notifications with individual patterns for contacts
• Android 16 Live Updates on Glyph Bar (navigation, Uber rides, timers)
• Illumination for photos

The Glyph matrix occupies 57% more surface area than its predecessor and is 100% brighter. The new “Glyph Toys” features add interactive elements — something no other manufacturer offers.

Software — Nothing OS 4.1 vs 3.1

Phone 4a Pro launches with Android 16 and Nothing OS 4.1, while 3a Pro debuted with Android 15 and Nothing OS 3.1 (update to Android 16 / Nothing OS 4.0 available from December 2025).

New features in Nothing OS 4.1:

• Glyph Live Updates — integration of Android 16 Live Updates with the Glyph matrix
• AI Eraser — local object removal from photos (no cloud)
• AI Ringtone Generation — AI-generated ringtones for individual contacts
• Relaxation Hub — “Breathing Break” widgets with Focus, Relax, and Calm modes
• Lock Screen Depth Effect (beta) — clock hides behind wallpaper elements

The update policy is identical — both phones will receive 3 major Android updates and 6 years of security patches. Phone 4a Pro will get Android up to version 19, while 3a Pro will get up to version 18.

Price in Poland — Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro

Variant	Phone 4a Pro	Phone 3a Pro (launch)	Phone 3a Pro (now)
8/128 GB	2099 PLN	none	none
12/256 GB	2399 PLN	2049 PLN	from ~1300 PLN

Phone 4a Pro in the 12/256 GB version costs 2399 PLN — that’s about 350 PLN more than the launch price of the 3a Pro in the same configuration. But the real difference is greater: the 3a Pro can today be purchased in promotions for about 1300–1800 PLN. This means that for the price of the Phone 4a Pro, you can get the Phone 3a Pro and still have enough left for the Nothing 3a Pro case and accessories.

Phone 4a Pro also offers a cheaper variant of 8/128 GB for 2099 PLN — an option not available with the 3a Pro.

💡 Tip: If budget is a priority, the Phone 3a Pro at current prices (1300–1800 PLN) is one of the best smartphones in this range. By paying extra for the 4a Pro, you mainly gain a better display, performance, and Glyph Matrix.

Which model for whom? Summary

Choose the Nothing Phone 4a Pro if:

• You care about having the best display in the segment (144 Hz, 5000 nits)
• You play games and need a stronger GPU
• You want the new Glyph Matrix with 137 LEDs
• You prefer a metal, premium build
• You are buying a new phone and comparing it with other new releases of 2026

Stick with the Nothing Phone 3a Pro (or buy it now) if:

• You love the transparent design of Nothing
• You often take selfies (50 MP vs 32 MP)
• You are looking for a great smartphone at a lower price (from ~1300 PLN)
• The current performance of the 3a Pro is enough for you
• You don’t need the latest Glyph features

In summary, comparing Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro — the new model is better in almost every technical category, but not enough for 3a Pro users to rush to the store. The biggest arguments for the upgrade are the 5000 nit display, Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, and the revolutionary Glyph Matrix. The biggest argument against it is the loss of the transparent design and a weaker selfie camera.

Check the full range of accessories for both models:
– Cases and glass for Nothing Phone 4a Pro
– Cases and glass for Nothing Phone 3a Pro
– All Nothing accessories

Alternatives — what else is worth considering?

If neither of the Nothing Phones meets your expectations one hundred percent, it’s worth looking at the competition in a similar price range:

Google Pixel 9a — a direct competitor in the segment. It offers pure Android, seven years of updates, and one of the best cameras among mid-range devices thanks to Google’s algorithms. No Glyph Interface and less distinctive design, but it makes up for it with software. You can find accessories for Pixel in our Google Pixel category.

OnePlus Nord 4 — if wireless charging is a priority, OnePlus has delivered what both Nothing Phones lack. A metal body (similar philosophy to 4a Pro), 120 Hz AMOLED, and OxygenOS based on pure Android. Check accessories for OnePlus.

Samsung Galaxy A56 — a choice for those who value the Samsung ecosystem. One UI, Samsung Pay, DeX — this is not offered by Nothing OS. Inferior Glyph (because it doesn’t exist), but better service support in Poland and a wide network of stores.

CMF Phone 2 Pro — a budget option from the Nothing sub-brand. Much cheaper, lacks periscope and Glyph, but shares the design philosophy and software with Nothing. Ideal if you like Nothing OS but don’t want to spend 2000+ PLN. Check out accessories for CMF Phone.

Note: Each of the above alternatives has its strengths, but none offers the Glyph Interface — this remains a unique feature of the Nothing ecosystem, which distinguishes the Phone 4a Pro and 3a Pro from the competition.

FAQ — frequently asked questions

Is it worth switching from Nothing Phone 3a Pro to 4a Pro?

If the 3a Pro is working well and you are not complaining about performance or the screen — you don’t need to rush. The upgrade makes sense mainly for those who want the brightest display in the segment (5000 nits), need a stronger GPU for gaming, or have fallen in love with the new Glyph Matrix. It is not worth replacing the phone after a year of use just for the price difference.

Which has a better camera — 4a Pro or 3a Pro?

It depends on the scenario. The main camera (50 MP, f/1.9) is identical in both. The Phone 4a Pro wins with the telephoto lens (3.5× vs 3× zoom) and image processing (TrueLens Engine 4, Ultra XDR video). But the 3a Pro has a clearly better selfie camera — 50 MP with a larger sensor vs 32 MP in the newer model.

How much does the Nothing Phone 4a Pro cost in Poland?

The Nothing Phone 4a Pro costs in Poland from 2099 PLN for the 8/128 GB version and 2399 PLN for the 12/256 GB version. In comparison, the Nothing Phone 3a Pro (12/256 GB) can now be purchased on promotion for about 1300–1800 PLN.

Does the Nothing Phone 4a Pro have wireless charging?

No — just like the 3a Pro. Neither model supports wireless charging. Both charge via cable with a power of 50 W. The Phone 4a Pro, however, offers reverse charging at 7.5 W, which its predecessor did not have.

What is the difference between the Glyph Interface in the 4a Pro and the 3a Pro?

The difference is huge. The Phone 3a Pro had 3 LED strips with 26 zones. The Phone 4a Pro has a completely new Glyph Matrix — 137 mini-LEDs displaying icons, animations, a clock, battery level, moon phase, and supporting Android 16 Live Updates.

How long will Nothing update both phones?

Both models will receive 3 major Android system updates and 6 years of security patches. Phone 4a Pro (launch: Android 16) will be updated to Android 19. Phone 3a Pro (launch: Android 15, currently Android 16) — to Android 18.

The dilemma of POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max is one of the hottest smartphone comparisons of 2026. Both models debuted in March and immediately generated enormous interest — they offer AMOLED displays with a brightness of 3,500 nits, IP68/IP69K protection, and 100 W charging. The key difference? Processor, battery, and camera. POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, while POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN. Below you will find a detailed comparison to help you choose the right model.

Technical specifications — POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max

Before we move on to a detailed analysis, it’s worth seeing the full specifications of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in one place. The table below shows the key differences between both models.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Display	6.59″ AMOLED, 1.5K	6.83″ AMOLED, 1.5K
Brightness	3,500 nits (peak)	3,500 nits (peak)
Refresh Rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Processor	MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra (4 nm)	MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (3 nm)
AnTuTu v11	2,283,558	3,085,998
RAM / Storage	8/256 GB or 12/512 GB	12/256 GB or 12/512 GB
Main Camera	50 MP, Sony IMX882, OIS	50 MP, Light Fusion 600, OIS
Battery	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
System	Android 16, HyperOS 3	Android 16, HyperOS 3
Resistance	IP68 / IP69K	IP68 / IP69K
Weight	201.5 g	218 g
Fingerprint Reader	Optical (under display)	Ultrasonic (under display)
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
eSIM	No	Yes
Price from	1,399 PLN	1,799 PLN

Display — bigger doesn’t always mean better

Both the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max feature 1.5K AMOLED panels with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and a peak brightness of 3,500 nits. They support Dolby Vision and HDR10+, which translates to excellent color reproduction while watching movies.

The main difference is the size — the POCO X8 Pro has a 6.59-inch display, while the POCO X8 Pro Max offers 6.83 inches. Both models are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i and have TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

Tip: If you value compactness and one-handed operation, the POCO X8 Pro will be more comfortable. For fans of large displays — the X8 Pro Max with a 6.83-inch panel is a better choice for movies and games.

The touch sampling rate is 480 Hz (Game Turbo) in both models, and the PWM dimming operates at 3,840 Hz — this is important for those sensitive to screen flicker.

Processor and performance — this is where the POCO X8 Pro Max excels

This is one of the biggest differences when comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra in a 4-nanometer process technology, while the Pro Max received the flagship Dimensity 9500s made in a 3 nm process.

The performance difference is clear — the POCO X8 Pro score in AnTuTu v11 is 2,283,558 points, while the POCO X8 Pro Max achieves 3,085,998 in AnTuTu:

Test	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max	Difference
AnTuTu v11	2,283,558	3,085,998	+35%
Process technology	4 nm (TSMC)	3 nm	Newer
GPU	Mali-G720 MC8	Immortalis-G925 MC12	Higher class

The Dimensity 9500s in the POCO X8 Pro Max is a flagship segment chip — the same processor can be found in phones costing over 3,000 PLN. The Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU provides smooth gameplay even in the most demanding mobile games, such as Genshin Impact or Honkai: Star Rail at the highest settings.

POCO X8 Pro with Dimensity 8500-Ultra also performs very well in everyday use — multitasking, social media, and gaming on medium settings are not a problem. However, in benchmarks and intensive games, the 35% difference in favor of the Max model is noticeable.

Both smartphones feature the POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system with a surface area of 5,300 mm², which effectively dissipates heat during longer gaming sessions.

It is worth adding that both models support 5G network (SA/NSA) — this is the standard in 2026, but still an important parameter when choosing a new smartphone. The RAM in both cases is LPDDR5X, and the internal storage is UFS 4.1 — the fastest available standards in the mid-premium segment.

Camera — Light Fusion 600 vs Sony IMX882

Both models have a 50 MP main camera with optical image stabilization (OIS), but the sensors used differ significantly.

POCO X8 Pro uses the Sony IMX882 — a proven sensor with a size of 1/1.95 inches and 0.8 μm pixels. It is a solid sensor that performs well in daylight and well-lit scenes.

POCO X8 Pro Max received the newer Light Fusion 600 with 1.6 μm pixels — twice as large as those in the X8 Pro. The Dual Native ISO Fusion technology improves dynamic range and significantly enhances photo quality in low light. In practice, this means less noise in night photos and better details in shadows.

The remaining elements of the camera set are identical:
– Ultra-wide angle — 8 MP, f/2.2
– Front — 20 MP, f/2.2
– Video recording — 4K at 30/60 fps, slow motion 960 fps

Tip: If you often take photos in the evening or in poorly lit interiors, the POCO X8 Pro Max with the Light Fusion 600 sensor will be a noticeably better choice.

Battery and charging — 6,500 vs 8,500 mAh

This is another category where the POCO X8 Pro Max clearly dominates. The 8,500 mAh battery (silicon-carbon technology) is 30% more than the 6,500 mAh in the Pro model.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Capacity	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Wired charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
Reverse charging	27 W	27 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Battery life	≥80% after 1,600 cycles	≥80% after 1,600 cycles

In practice, the POCO X8 Pro Max easily lasts two full days of moderate use, and with light usage, even three days. The POCO X8 Pro comfortably provides a full day even with intensive use.

Both models charge with a power of 100 W — the POCO X8 Pro Max recovers 50% of energy in about 24 minutes, and a full charge takes just over 50 minutes. Neither model supports wireless charging.

If you are looking for a fast wall charger that supports 100 W, it’s worth choosing a model with USB Power Delivery (fast charging standard) or a dedicated Xiaomi charger. A compact power bank with the appropriate output power will also be useful for daily top-ups while traveling.

Build and design — aluminum, glass, and IP69K

Both smartphones have aluminum frames, Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the front, and an IP68/IP69K certification — they can withstand immersion in water as well as a stream of hot water under pressure. This is rare in this price range. Despite their durability, it is worth protecting the display — screen protectors will provide additional protection against scratches in everyday use.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Dimensions	157.5 × 75.2 × 8.4 mm	162.9 × 77.9 × 8.2 mm
Weight	201.5 g	218 g
Back cover	Glass	Fiberglass
SIM	Dual nano-SIM	Dual nano-SIM + eSIM
RGB backlight	8 colors	8 colors
Colors	Black, White, Mint Green	Black, White, Blue

POCO X8 Pro is lighter by 16.5 g and slightly narrower — it fits better in the hand and in narrower pockets. The Max model is slimmer (8.2 vs 8.4 mm) but larger and heavier due to the bigger battery and display.

It is worth mentioning that the POCO X8 Pro is also available in a limited Iron Man edition (12/512 GB) for 1,749 PLN on promotion — this variant is for Marvel fans.

Regardless of the chosen model, it is good to invest in a suitable POCO smartphone case that will protect the aluminum frame and glass or fiberglass back from mechanical damage.

Connectivity — Wi-Fi 7 and eSIM only in the Max model

In terms of connectivity, the POCO X8 Pro Max offers several significant improvements:

• Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) instead of Wi-Fi 6 — faster transfer and lower latency
• eSIM — a convenient solution while traveling, without the need to swap a physical SIM card
• Bluetooth 5.4 with Auracast — wireless audio sharing to multiple headphones simultaneously
• Symmetrical stereo speakers — better sound than the standard stereo speakers in the X8 Pro

The POCO X8 Pro 5G and POCO X8 Pro Max 5G support both SA and NSA modes. Other common connectivity features include NFC, infrared port (IR blaster), USB-C 2.0, GPS L1+L5, and Dolby Atmos with Hi-Res Audio (24-bit/192 kHz). Neither model has a 3.5 mm headphone jack — if you prefer wireless audio, check out Bluetooth headphones compatible with both smartphones.

Security and Software

Both smartphones run on Android 16 with HyperOS 3 and will receive 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. They also have access to Google Gemini, Circle to Search, and AI tools (AI Writing, AI Speech).

The key difference concerns the fingerprint reader:

• POCO X8 Pro — optical reader under the screen
• POCO X8 Pro Max — ultrasonic reader under the screen

The ultrasonic reader works faster, is more precise, and recognizes the finger even when wet — this is a clear advantage of the Max model.

POCO X8 Pro Max also offers the Xiaomi Offline Communication feature with a range of up to 500 m — it allows communication with other Xiaomi devices without internet access or cellular network.

Price of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in Poland

How much do these smartphones cost? The price of POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, and the price of POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN in the promotional launch (until March 31, 2026):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1,399 PLN (only mi.com)	—
12/256 GB	—	1,799 PLN (only mi.com)
12/512 GB	1,599 PLN	1,999 PLN
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1,749 PLN	—

Regular prices (after the promotion):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1,699 PLN	—
12/256 GB	—	2,099 PLN
12/512 GB	1,899 PLN	2,299 PLN
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1,999 PLN	—

The difference of 400 PLN between comparable variants (12/512 GB) is a reasonable surcharge for the flagship processor, larger battery, better camera, and Wi-Fi 7. You can find current prices and availability on the official POCO website.

Gaming performance — how do they perform in practice?

Simply comparing AnTuTu scores does not provide the full picture. In everyday use, both smartphones perform excellently — apps open instantly, multitasking works smoothly, and scrolling through the interface is fluid at 120 Hz.

The difference becomes apparent in demanding mobile games. The POCO X8 Pro Max with the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU maintains a stable 60 fps in Genshin Impact at the highest graphics settings, while the POCO X8 Pro with the Mali-G720 MC8 requires lowering some options to medium to maintain smoothness. In less demanding titles — PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, or Honkai: Star Rail — both models run without issues at high settings.

The POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system works effectively in both cases. After a 30-minute session of Genshin Impact, the casing temperatures remain within a comfortable range. The POCO X8 Pro Max has a slight advantage here due to its larger casing, which dissipates heat better.

For casual gamers, the POCO X8 Pro will be more than sufficient. However, if you regularly play the most demanding titles and care about maximum graphics settings, the Dimensity 9500s in the Max model is a safer choice for the coming years.

POCO X8 Pro Max vs competition — how does it compare to rivals?

It’s worth looking at both POCO models in the context of the market. In the price range of 1,400–2,300 PLN, the competition is significant:

• Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (~1,699 PLN) — better Samsung ecosystem, longer support (7 years of updates), but noticeably weaker Exynos 1580 processor and smaller 5,000 mAh battery. The POCO X8 Pro offers more performance for a similar price.
• Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (~1,599 PLN) — a close relative from the Xiaomi family. Similar specifications to the POCO X8 Pro, but slightly weaker Dimensity 8400-Ultra and smaller 6,200 mAh battery. POCO stands out with an IP69K certification.
• Nothing Phone (3a) (~1,799 PLN) — distinguished by its Glyph lighting design, pure Android, but weaker processor and smaller battery. A choice for those who prioritize aesthetics.
• Motorola Edge 60 (~1,899 PLN) — a competitor with wireless charging, which is lacking in POCO. However, it falls short in performance compared to the POCO X8 Pro Max.

POCO X8 Pro Max priced at 1,999 PLN (12/512 GB) offers performance comparable to smartphones costing over 3,000 PLN — Samsung Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, or Xiaomi 15. This is its biggest competitive advantage.

Summary of differences — who wins in each category?

Category	Winner	Why?
Display	POCO X8 Pro Max	Larger 6.83″ panel
Performance	POCO X8 Pro Max	Dimensity 9500s, +35% in AnTuTu
Camera	POCO X8 Pro Max	Light Fusion 600, better night photos
Battery	POCO X8 Pro Max	8,500 vs 6,500 mAh
Compactness	POCO X8 Pro	Lighter (201.5 g), narrower
Price	POCO X8 Pro	From 1,399 PLN
Connectivity	POCO X8 Pro Max	Wi-Fi 7, eSIM, Auracast
Biometrics	POCO X8 Pro Max	Ultrasonic reader

POCO X8 Pro Max wins in six out of eight categories — but POCO X8 Pro holds its ground with its price and compact dimensions.

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

The choice between POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max depends on your priorities and budget.

Choose POCO X8 Pro if:
– You are looking for the best value for money under 1,700 PLN
– You prefer a compact and lighter smartphone (201.5 g vs 218 g)
– You don’t need flagship performance — Dimensity 8500-Ultra is more than sufficient for everyday tasks
– You are interested in the limited Iron Man edition

Choose POCO X8 Pro Max if:
– You want the flagship Dimensity 9500s processor with performance comparable to phones costing over 3,000 PLN
– You care about the longest battery life — 8,500 mAh lasts 2–3 days without charging
– You take a lot of photos in low light — Light Fusion 600 makes a noticeable difference
– You need eSIM or Wi-Fi 7
– You value a faster and more accurate ultrasonic fingerprint reader

Our verdict: For an additional 400 PLN, POCO X8 Pro Max offers significantly more — a flagship processor, a huge battery, and a better camera. It is one of the best smartphones in terms of price to performance ratio in 2026. However, if compactness and a lower price are priorities, POCO X8 Pro remains an excellent choice.

In summary, comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — both smartphones offer excellent value, but the Max model targets users who want flagship performance without the flagship price.

Are you looking for accessories for your new POCO smartphone? Check out cases and tempered glass for POCO phones at Home Screen — you’ll find protection tailored to your model.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — what are the differences?

The main differences are the processor (Dimensity 8500-Ultra vs flagship Dimensity 9500s), battery (6,500 vs 8,500 mAh), camera sensor (Sony IMX882 vs Light Fusion 600 with larger pixels), fingerprint reader (optical vs ultrasonic), and connectivity (Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7, no eSIM vs eSIM).

Is the POCO X8 Pro Max worth the additional 400 PLN?

Yes — for an additional 400 PLN, you get a flagship processor with 35% higher performance, a battery that’s 2,000 mAh larger, a better camera for night photos, Wi-Fi 7, and eSIM. It’s one of the better upgrades on the smartphone market.

What is the price of the POCO X8 Pro in Poland?

The POCO X8 Pro costs from 1,399 PLN (8/256 GB, promotional price) to 1,899 PLN (12/512 GB, regular price). There is also a limited Iron Man edition available for 1,749–1,999 PLN.

Are the POCO X8 Pro and X8 Pro Max waterproof?

Yes — both models have an IP68 and IP69K certification, which means they are resistant to immersion in water (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes) and to a stream of hot water under pressure.

How long does the battery last in the POCO X8 Pro Max?

The 8,500 mAh battery in the POCO X8 Pro Max lasts for 2–3 days of moderate use. The 100 W HyperCharge charging allows you to recover 50% of the energy in about 24 minutes.

Does the POCO X8 Pro have eSIM?

No — eSIM is available only in the POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model supports only two physical nano-SIM cards.

The dilemma of POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max is one of the hottest smartphone comparisons of 2026. Both models debuted in March and immediately sparked huge interest — they offer AMOLED displays with a brightness of 3,500 nits, IP68/IP69K protection, and 100 W charging. The key difference? Processor, battery, and camera. POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, while POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN. Below you will find a detailed comparison to help you choose the right model.

Technical specifications — POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max

Before we move on to a detailed analysis, it’s worth looking at the full specifications of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in one place. The table below shows the key differences between both models.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Display	6.59″ AMOLED, 1.5K	6.83″ AMOLED, 1.5K
Brightness	3,500 nits (peak)	3,500 nits (peak)
Refresh Rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Processor	MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra (4 nm)	MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (3 nm)
AnTuTu v11	2,283,558	3,085,998
RAM / Storage	8/256 GB or 12/512 GB	12/256 GB or 12/512 GB
Main Camera	50 MP, Sony IMX882, OIS	50 MP, Light Fusion 600, OIS
Battery	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
Operating System	Android 16, HyperOS 3	Android 16, HyperOS 3
Resistance	IP68 / IP69K	IP68 / IP69K
Weight	201.5 g	218 g
Fingerprint Reader	Optical (under display)	Ultrasonic (under display)
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
eSIM	No	Yes
Price from	1,399 PLN	1,799 PLN

Display — bigger doesn’t always mean better

Both the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max feature 1.5K AMOLED displays with a 120 Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 3,500 nits. They support Dolby Vision and HDR10+, resulting in excellent color reproduction while watching movies.

The main difference is size — the POCO X8 Pro has a 6.59-inch display, while the POCO X8 Pro Max offers 6.83 inches. Both models are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i and have TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

Tip: If you value compactness and one-handed use, the POCO X8 Pro will be more comfortable. For fans of large displays — the X8 Pro Max with its 6.83-inch panel is a better choice for movies and games.

The touch sampling rate is 480 Hz (Game Turbo) in both models, and PWM dimming operates at 3,840 Hz — this is important for those sensitive to screen flicker.

Processor and performance — this is where the POCO X8 Pro Max excels

This is one of the biggest differences when comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra in a 4-nanometer manufacturing process, while the Pro Max received the flagship Dimensity 9500s made in a 3 nm process.

The performance difference is clear — the POCO X8 Pro score in AnTuTu v11 is 2,283,558 points, while the POCO X8 Pro Max reaches 3,085,998 in AnTuTu:

Test	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max	Difference
AnTuTu v11	2,283,558	3,085,998	+35%
Manufacturing process	4 nm (TSMC)	3 nm	Newer
GPU	Mali-G720 MC8	Immortalis-G925 MC12	Higher class

The Dimensity 9500s in the POCO X8 Pro Max is a flagship segment chip — the same processor can be found in phones costing over 3,000 PLN. The Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU provides smooth gameplay even in the most demanding mobile games, such as Genshin Impact or Honkai: Star Rail at the highest settings.

POCO X8 Pro with Dimensity 8500-Ultra also performs very well in everyday use — multitasking, social media, and gaming at medium settings are not a problem. However, in benchmarks and intensive games, the 35% difference in favor of the Max model is noticeable.

Both smartphones feature the POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system with a surface area of 5,300 mm², which effectively dissipates heat during longer gaming sessions.

It is worth mentioning that both models support 5G network (SA/NSA) — this is the standard in 2026, but still an important parameter when choosing a new smartphone. The RAM in both cases is LPDDR5X, and the internal storage is UFS 4.1 — the fastest available standards in the mid-premium segment.

Camera — Light Fusion 600 vs Sony IMX882

Both models have a main camera of 50 MP with optical image stabilization (OIS), but the sensors used differ significantly.

POCO X8 Pro uses the Sony IMX882 — a proven sensor with a size of 1/1.95 inches and 0.8 μm pixels. It is a solid sensor that performs well in daylight and well-lit scenes.

POCO X8 Pro Max received the newer Light Fusion 600 with 1.6 μm pixels — twice as large as those in the X8 Pro. The Dual Native ISO Fusion technology improves dynamic range and significantly enhances photo quality in low light. In practice, this means less noise in night photos and better details in shadows.

The remaining elements of the camera set are identical:
– Ultra-wide angle — 8 MP, f/2.2
– Front — 20 MP, f/2.2
– Video recording — 4K at 30/60 fps, slow motion 960 fps

Tip: If you often take photos in the evening or in poorly lit interiors, the POCO X8 Pro Max with the Light Fusion 600 sensor will be a noticeably better choice.

Battery and charging — 6,500 vs 8,500 mAh

This is another category where the POCO X8 Pro Max clearly dominates. The 8,500 mAh battery (silicon-carbon technology) is 30% more than the 6,500 mAh in the Pro model.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Capacity	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Wired charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
Reverse charging	27 W	27 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Battery life	≥80% after 1,600 cycles	≥80% after 1,600 cycles

In practice, the POCO X8 Pro Max easily lasts two full days of moderate use, and with light usage, even three days. The POCO X8 Pro comfortably provides a full day even with intensive use.

Both models charge at a power of 100 W — the POCO X8 Pro Max recovers 50% of energy in about 24 minutes, and a full charge takes just over 50 minutes. Neither model supports wireless charging.

If you are looking for a fast wall charger that supports 100 W, it’s worth choosing a model with USB Power Delivery (fast charging standard) or a dedicated Xiaomi charger. A compact power bank with the appropriate output power will also be useful for daily charging on the go.

Construction and design — aluminum, glass, and IP69K

Both smartphones have aluminum frames, Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the front, and an IP68/IP69K certification — they can withstand immersion in water as well as a stream of hot water under pressure. This is rare in this price range. Despite their durability, it’s worth protecting the display — screen protectors will provide additional protection against scratches in everyday use.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Dimensions	157.5 × 75.2 × 8.4 mm	162.9 × 77.9 × 8.2 mm
Weight	201.5 g	218 g
Back cover	Glass	Fiberglass
SIM	Dual nano-SIM	Dual nano-SIM + eSIM
RGB backlight	8 colors	8 colors
Colors	Black, White, Mint Green	Black, White, Blue

POCO X8 Pro is lighter by 16.5 g and slightly narrower — it fits better in the hand and fits into narrower pockets. The Max model is slimmer (8.2 vs 8.4 mm), but larger and heavier due to the bigger battery and display.

It’s worth mentioning that the POCO X8 Pro is also available in a limited Iron Man edition (12/512 GB) for 1,749 PLN on promotion — this is a variant for Marvel fans.

Regardless of the chosen model, it’s good to invest in a suitable case for the POCO smartphone that will protect the aluminum frame and glass or fiberglass back from mechanical damage.

Connectivity — Wi-Fi 7 and eSIM only in the Max model

In terms of connectivity, the POCO X8 Pro Max offers several significant improvements:

• Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) instead of Wi-Fi 6 — faster transfer and lower latency
• eSIM — a convenient solution while traveling, without the need to swap physical SIM cards
• Bluetooth 5.4 with Auracast — wireless audio sharing to multiple headphones simultaneously
• Symmetrical stereo speakers — better sound than the standard stereo speakers in the X8 Pro

POCO X8 Pro 5G and POCO X8 Pro Max 5G support both SA and NSA modes. Other common connectivity features include NFC, infrared port (IR blaster), USB-C 2.0, GPS L1+L5, and Dolby Atmos with Hi-Res Audio (24-bit/192 kHz). Neither model has a 3.5 mm headphone jack — if you prefer wireless audio, check out Bluetooth headphones compatible with both smartphones.

Security and Software

Both smartphones run on Android 16 with HyperOS 3 and will receive 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. They also have access to Google Gemini, Circle to Search, and AI tools (AI Writing, AI Speech).

The key difference concerns the fingerprint reader:

• POCO X8 Pro — optical reader under the screen
• POCO X8 Pro Max — ultrasonic reader under the screen

The ultrasonic reader works faster, is more precise, and recognizes the finger even when wet — this is a clear advantage of the Max model.

POCO X8 Pro Max also offers the Xiaomi Offline Communication feature with a range of up to 500 m — it allows communication with other Xiaomi devices without access to the internet or cellular network.

Price of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in Poland

How much do these smartphones cost? The price of POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, and the price of POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN in the promotional launch (until March 31, 2026):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1,399 PLN (only mi.com)	—
12/256 GB	—	1,799 PLN (only mi.com)
12/512 GB	1,599 PLN	1,999 PLN
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1,749 PLN	—

Regular prices (after promotion):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1,699 zł	—
12/256 GB	—	2,099 zł
12/512 GB	1,899 zł	2,299 zł
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1,999 zł	—

The difference of 400 zł between comparable variants (12/512 GB) is a reasonable surcharge for the flagship processor, larger battery, better camera, and Wi-Fi 7. You can find current prices and availability on the official POCO website.

Gaming performance — how do they perform in practice?

Simply comparing AnTuTu scores does not provide the full picture. In everyday use, both smartphones perform excellently — apps open instantly, multitasking works smoothly, and scrolling through the interface is fluid at 120 Hz.

The difference becomes noticeable in demanding mobile games. The POCO X8 Pro Max with the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU maintains a stable 60 fps in Genshin Impact at the highest graphics settings, while the POCO X8 Pro with the Mali-G720 MC8 requires lowering some options to medium to maintain fluidity. In less demanding titles — PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, or Honkai: Star Rail — both models run smoothly at high settings.

The POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system works effectively in both cases. After a 30-minute session of Genshin Impact, the casing temperatures remain within a comfortable range. The POCO X8 Pro Max has a slight advantage here due to its larger casing, which dissipates heat better.

For casual gamers, the POCO X8 Pro will be more than sufficient. However, if you regularly play the most demanding titles and care about maximum graphic settings, the Dimensity 9500s in the Max model is a safer choice for the years to come.

POCO X8 Pro Max vs competition — how does it compare to rivals?

It is worth looking at both POCO models in the context of the market. In the price range of 1,400–2,300 PLN, the competition is significant:

• Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (~1,699 PLN) — better Samsung ecosystem, longer support (7 years of updates), but noticeably weaker Exynos 1580 processor and smaller 5,000 mAh battery. The POCO X8 Pro offers more performance for a similar price.
• Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (~1,599 PLN) — a close relative from the Xiaomi family. Similar specifications to the POCO X8 Pro, but slightly weaker Dimensity 8400-Ultra and smaller 6,200 mAh battery. POCO stands out with an IP69K certification.
• Nothing Phone (3a) (~1,799 PLN) — distinguished by its Glyph lighting design, pure Android, but weaker processor and smaller battery. A choice for those who prioritize aesthetics.
• Motorola Edge 60 (~1,899 PLN) — a competitor with wireless charging, which is lacking in POCO. However, it falls short in performance compared to the POCO X8 Pro Max.

POCO X8 Pro Max priced at 1,999 PLN (12/512 GB) offers performance comparable to smartphones costing over 3,000 PLN — Samsung Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, or Xiaomi 15. This is its biggest competitive advantage.

Summary of differences — who wins in each category?

Category	Winner	Why?
Display	POCO X8 Pro Max	Larger 6.83″ panel
Performance	POCO X8 Pro Max	Dimensity 9500s, +35% in AnTuTu
Camera	POCO X8 Pro Max	Light Fusion 600, better night photos
Battery	POCO X8 Pro Max	8,500 vs 6,500 mAh
Compactness	POCO X8 Pro	Lighter (201.5 g), narrower
Price	POCO X8 Pro	From 1,399 PLN
Connectivity	POCO X8 Pro Max	Wi-Fi 7, eSIM, Auracast
Biometrics	POCO X8 Pro Max	Ultrasonic reader

POCO X8 Pro Max wins in six out of eight categories — but POCO X8 Pro stands its ground with its price and compact dimensions.

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

The choice between POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max depends on your priorities and budget.

Choose POCO X8 Pro if:
– You are looking for the best value for money under 1,700 PLN
– You prefer a compact and lighter smartphone (201.5 g vs 218 g)
– You don’t need flagship performance — Dimensity 8500-Ultra is more than enough for everyday tasks
– You are interested in the limited Iron Man edition

Choose POCO X8 Pro Max if:
– You want a flagship Dimensity 9500s processor with performance comparable to phones costing over 3,000 PLN
– You care about the longest battery life — 8,500 mAh lasts 2–3 days without charging
– You take a lot of photos in low light — Light Fusion 600 makes a noticeable difference
– You need eSIM or Wi-Fi 7
– You value a faster and more accurate ultrasonic fingerprint reader

Our verdict: For an additional 400 PLN, POCO X8 Pro Max offers significantly more — a flagship processor, a huge battery, and a better camera. It is one of the best smartphones in terms of price to performance ratio in 2026. However, if compactness and a lower price are priorities, POCO X8 Pro remains an excellent choice.

In summary, comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — both smartphones offer excellent value, but the Max model targets users who want flagship performance without the flagship price.

Are you looking for accessories for your new POCO smartphone? Check out cases and tempered glass for POCO phones at Home Screen — you’ll find protection tailored to your model.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — what are the differences?

The main differences are the processor (Dimensity 8500-Ultra vs flagship Dimensity 9500s), battery (6,500 vs 8,500 mAh), camera sensor (Sony IMX882 vs Light Fusion 600 with larger pixels), fingerprint reader (optical vs ultrasonic), and connectivity (Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7, no eSIM vs eSIM).

Is the POCO X8 Pro Max worth the extra 400 PLN?

Yes — for an additional 400 PLN, you get a flagship processor with 35% higher performance, a battery that is 2,000 mAh larger, a better camera for night photos, Wi-Fi 7, and eSIM. It’s one of the better upgrades on the smartphone market.

What is the price of the POCO X8 Pro in Poland?

The POCO X8 Pro costs from 1,399 PLN (8/256 GB, promotional price) to 1,899 PLN (12/512 GB, regular price). There is also a limited Iron Man edition available for 1,749–1,999 PLN.

Are the POCO X8 Pro and X8 Pro Max waterproof?

Yes — both models have an IP68 and IP69K certification, which means they are resistant to immersion in water (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes) and to a stream of hot water under pressure.

How long does the battery last in the POCO X8 Pro Max?

The 8,500 mAh battery in the POCO X8 Pro Max lasts for 2–3 days of moderate use. The 100 W HyperCharge charging allows you to regain 50% of the energy in about 24 minutes.

Does the POCO X8 Pro have eSIM?

No — eSIM is only available in the POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model supports only two physical nano-SIM cards.

If you are looking for the best POCO phone in Poland at the end of 2025, choose the POCO F8 Pro — it offers a more powerful processor, a better camera with a telephoto lens, and a larger battery with faster charging. But if you care about a great 2K screen and want to spend less than 2000 PLN, the POCO F7 Pro is still an excellent option.

📊 Comparison of specifications POCO F7 PRO vs POCO F8 PRO

Feature / Parameter	POCO F7 Pro	POCO F8 Pro
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm, Oryon)
GPU	Adreno 750	Adreno 830
RAM / Internal Memory	12 GB LPDDR5X + 256 / 512 GB UFS 4.1	12 GB LPDDR5X + 256 / 512 GB UFS 4.1
Display	6.67″ AMOLED, 3200×1440, 120 Hz	6.59″ AMOLED, 2510×1156, 120 Hz, 3500 nit
Rear Cameras	50 MP (main) + 8 MP (ultrawide)	50 MP (main) + 50 MP tele + 8 MP ultrawide
Selfie Camera	20 MP	20 MP
Battery	6000 mAh	6210 mAh
Charging	90W HyperCharge	100W HyperCharge + 22.5W reverse charge
Body / Dimensions / Weight	160.26 × 74.95 × 8.12 mm — 206 g	157.49 × 75.25 × 8.0 mm — 199 g
SIM / eSIM	Dual nanoSIM	nanoSIM + nanoSIM / nanoSIM + eSIM / eSIM + eSIM
Water Resistance	IP68	IP68
Operating System	HyperOS 2 (Android 15)	HyperOS 3 (Android 16)
Connectivity / Wi-Fi / Bluetooth	Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4	Wi-Fi 7 (8×8 MU-MIMO), Bluetooth 5.4
Approximate Price (PL)	about 1800–2000 PLN (promotions)	about 2099–2299 PLN

Display and External Appearance

What has changed in the design and display of POCO F8 Pro compared to F7 Pro?

In terms of appearance and build quality, both models present a high level, but the POCO F8 Pro introduces a few subtle changes that affect daily ergonomics:

• Smaller dimensions and lower weight: The F8 Pro is shorter (157.5 mm vs 160.3 mm) and lighter (199 g vs 206 g), which translates to more comfortable one-handed use.
• Rounded edges and better grip: The new shape of the F8 Pro features gentle curves and a thinner bottom bezel, making the phone fit better in the hand.
• Identical IP68 resistance class: Both smartphones are resistant to dust and immersion in water up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes, confirming a high standard of workmanship.

The change in form is not revolutionary, but the F8 Pro is noticeably more compact and “smoother” in daily use – without compromising on sturdiness.

➡️ If you want to improve the protection and grip of the device, choose the appropriate  case for POCO F7 Pro or case for POCO F8 Pro.

---

Screen: sharpness vs brightness – which is better for the eyes?

POCO F7 Pro impresses with its classic form – a flat 6.67″ AMOLED display with WQHD+ resolution (3200×1440 px) and thin, symmetrical bezels. With 12-bit color depth, support for HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, and very high sharpness (526 ppi), it is the perfect display for those who value detail – for reading, watching high-quality movies, or playing graphically intensive games.

The POCO F8 Pro features a smaller 6.59″ screen with a resolution of 2510×1156 px (446 ppi). Importantly, it has a significantly higher peak brightness – up to 3500 nits (vs 3200 nits in F7 Pro), making it better for outdoor use. Additionally, it supports Wet Touch 2.0 mode, which enhances touch responsiveness in rain or with wet fingers – a rarity even among flagships.

Both displays support 120 Hz refresh rate and advanced dimming (PWM/DC), but differ in priority: F7 Pro focuses on sharpness and pixel density, while F8 Pro prioritizes comfort in all lighting conditions. – the screen responds better to touch in humid conditions. Both displays are top quality, but the choice depends on whether detail (F7 Pro) or brightness and response time (F8 Pro) is more important.

➡️ Check the matched tempered glass for POCO F7 Pro or tempered glass for POCO F8 Pro to avoid screen damage.

---

Cameras and Photo-Video Capabilities

Telephoto vs No Tele – an advantage that is immediately visible

Both smartphones use the same, very good 50 MP Light Fusion 800 sensor as the main camera. It is a 1/1.55″ sensor with OIS, large 2.0 μm pixels (after 4-in-1 binning) and excellent photo quality both day and night. However, this is where the similarities end.

🔍 POCO F8 Pro – a huge leap thanks to the 50 MP telephoto lens

F8 Pro is the only one in this pair that has a dedicated 50 MP telephoto lens with a focal length of 60 mm, which offers:

• 2× optical zoom without loss of quality,
• significantly better portrait photos with natural background separation,
• sharper detail photos from a greater distance,
• Super Moon mode and adaptive zoom.

This makes the F8 Pro clearly more versatile in photography.

🌄 POCO F7 Pro – only wide and ultra-wide

The F7 Pro offers two cameras:

• 50 MP main (the same as in F8 Pro),
• 8 MP ultra-wide.

The lack of a telephoto lens means that every zoom is digital, so quality decreases with close-ups. Portraits also look weaker – the bokeh effect is more artificial.

🎥 Video – both record in 8K, but the F8 Pro does it better

• F7 Pro: 8K 24 fps, 4K 60 fps.
• F8 Pro: 8K 30 fps, 4K 60 fps + more stabilization modes.

Additionally, the F8 Pro offers:

• director mode,
• dual video recording,
• ShootSteady,
• better motion tracking.

🤳 Selfie Camera – tie

Both phones have the same 20 MP front camera, offering HDR, portrait mode, and 1080p 60 fps recording.

Section summary: If you take a lot of photos, especially portraits and close-ups — the F8 Pro is a crushing winner. The F7 Pro provides great quality from the main sensor, but it lacks versatility.

---

Battery and Charging

Greater capacity or greater convenience? Differences you can feel every day

In terms of battery, both models perform excellently, but they differ in their approach to runtime and additional features.

🔋 POCO F7 Pro — solid 6000 mAh battery

• Capacity: 6000 mAh
• Wired charging: 90W HyperCharge
• No reverse charging

The F7 Pro offers very good runtime — even 7–8 hours SOT, and with 90W it can be charged quickly. This is an excellent battery in its price range.

⚡ POCO F8 Pro — larger battery, faster charging, and power bank function

• Capacity: 6210 mAh (210 mAh more)
• Wired charging: 100W HyperCharge (full charge in about 30 minutes)
• Reverse charging 22.5W — you can charge your headphones, smartwatch, or a second phone

The F8 Pro offers a realistically longer battery life (on average +40–60 minutes) and additionally acts as a portable power bank thanks to fast reverse charging.

📌 Which smartphone has a better battery?

• If you care about maximum convenience and the fastest charging → choose POCO F8 Pro.
• If you want very good battery life at a lower price → the F7 Pro is still a great choice.

In practice: the advantage of the F8 Pro is clear, as it combines greater capacity, better charging technology, and additional features that the F7 Pro does not offer.

➡️ To take advantage of the full power of 100W, it’s worth checking fast chargers for POCO F8 Pro, which support the PD/PPS standard and enable the fastest possible charging of the phone.

---

Performance and Computing Power

Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in POCO F7 Pro – powerful, stable, predictable

Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 has long been Qualcomm’s most powerful processor and still performs excellently in 2025. It is a chip that guarantees:

• high level of fluidity in applications,
• stable performance even during long gaming sessions,
• good cooling performance and energy efficiency.

In everyday use, the F7 Pro operates dynamically — switching apps, multitasking, and media handling are fast and seamless. In gaming, the phone maintains frame rates very well, although in the heaviest FPS titles, it can slightly drop after longer sessions.

In short: The F7 Pro still offers flagship-level performance, but at a lower price.

---

Snapdragon 8 Elite in POCO F8 Pro – groundbreaking Oryon architecture

The Snapdragon 8 Elite is in a completely different league. Qualcomm has implemented the Oryon architecture, which is significantly more advanced than classic ARM cores.

The main advantages:

• significantly higher single-core performance, which is felt with every touch of the screen,
• much stronger Performance cores, which maintain stable clock speeds under heavier loads,
• better performance with AI and multimedia, which affects photo and video processing, transcription, and content recognition.

In practice, the F8 Pro works faster — apps open instantly, animations are more responsive, and the phone hardly slows down even with 30–40 apps in the background.

---

System and Smart Features

HyperOS 2 vs HyperOS 3 – is the difference noticeable?

POCO F7 Pro runs on HyperOS 2 (Android 15), while the POCO F8 Pro debuts with HyperOS 3 based on Android 16. Although the interface is visually similar, the differences are clear in performance and system features.

HyperOS 3 in POCO F8 Pro — faster, smoother, smarter

The new version of HyperOS introduces several improvements:

• better power management thanks to the new processor workload schedule,
• more responsive animations — utilizing the higher performance of Oryon,
• enhanced AI modules that speed up photo processing, translations, and searches,
• greater stability of background applications due to RAM optimization.

F8 Pro also leverages the power of Snapdragon 8 Elite for AI features that F7 Pro does not support, e.g., at such quality or speed.

HyperOS 2 in POCO F7 Pro — still fast, but less flexible

HyperOS 2 is a very stable and lightweight system that offers:

• quick app switching,
• intuitive gestures,
• wide customization options,
• good RAM management.

It works great, but it lacks some AI enhancements that only appeared in version 3.

---

🔐 Security and Biometrics

Both phones offer:

• ultrasonic fingerprint reader in the display,
• AI facial recognition,
• regular security updates.

The difference is that F8 Pro will be supported longer, as HyperOS 3 is a newer generation of the system.

---

Conclusions — which system is better?

• F7 Pro → fast, stable, refined, ideal for those who do not need next-generation AI features.
• F8 Pro → more future-proof, faster in animations, smarter, better utilizes processor power.

👉 If you care about up-to-date software and the best responsiveness — F8 Pro wins.

---

Connectivity and Global Standards

eSIM, 5G, Wi-Fi — here is one of the key differences

In terms of connectivity, both models offer a full set of modern technologies, but the POCO F8 Pro has a more flexible SIM configuration and newer wireless connectivity standards.

---

SIM Cards — F8 Pro’s Advantage with eSIM Support

POCO F7 Pro

• Dual nanoSIM (2× physical cards)
  No eSIM support.

POCO F8 Pro

• nano SIM + nano SIM
  or
• nano SIM + eSIM
  or
• eSIM + eSIM

eSIM requires activation with the operator and may have roaming restrictions — depending on the country and service provider.

This is a significant advantage of the F8 Pro, especially for those using:

• two numbers,
• foreign profiles,
• eSIM cards in a smartwatch or for easy operator switching.

---

Supported 5G and LTE bands

Both phones support the same key bands:

• 5G SA/NSA,
• wide range of TDD and FDD bands for Europe,
• full operator support in Poland (Orange, Play, Plus, T-Mobile).

However, the F8 Pro has a somewhat richer list of bands, especially in 5G SA/NSA, making it more future-proof.

---

📡 Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

F7 Pro

• Wi-Fi 7, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5
• Bluetooth 5.4

F8 Pro

• Wi-Fi 7 (more comprehensive support, 8×8 MU-MIMO),
• support for multiple links (multi-link),
• Bluetooth 5.4,
• support for LDAC, LHDC 5.0, AptX Adaptive, and a full set of codecs.

In practice:

• F8 Pro has more stable connections in crowded networks,
• better BT sound quality,
• lower latency in games.

---

GPS and location

Both models have very broad support for global systems:

• GPS L1+L5
• Galileo E1+E5a
• QZSS
• GLONASS
• Beidou
• NavIC

The differences in practice are minimal — both phones offer fast and precise positioning, even in the city.

---

Connectivity Summary

POCO F8 Pro wins because it offers:

• eSIM in multiple configurations,
• more advanced Wi-Fi 7,
• wider range of 5G bands,
• better audio BT codecs.

F7 Pro is still very good, but the F8 Pro offers more options and is more future-proof.

---

Prices and Availability in Poland

What are the prices of POCO F7 Pro and F8 Pro?

• In official Polish sales, the list price of the F8 Pro (12 GB RAM + 512 GB) is 2299 PLN.
• The cheaper variant of the F8 Pro (12/256 GB) started at 2099 PLN. 
• Some stores may also have promotional offers — then the price may be lower, although it rarely drops to a level similar to the F7 Pro. 

Conclusions:

• The F8 Pro currently ranks above the level of “budget flagships” — the price of approx. 2099–2299 PLN reflects its modern features (telephoto lens, eSIM, powerful processor).
• If you find the F7 Pro on sale (~1800–2000 PLN), it may be more cost-effective with a good compromise between price and capabilities.
• The F8 Pro offers more options for the future — better camera, eSIM, faster charging — but you will pay more for it.

---

Summary: Which model to choose?

🔥 POCO F8 Pro — the choice for those who want:

• the best possible performance (Snapdragon 8 Elite with Oryon architecture),
• a better camera with 50 MP telephoto lens,
• support for eSIM in various configurations,
• a larger battery and 100W faster charging,
• a more compact and lighter design,
• longer system support (HyperOS 3).

This is a more future-proof, versatile phone aimed at demanding users.

---

💎 POCO F7 Pro — a choice for those who want:

• a great screen WQHD+ 3200×1440 (a rarity at this price),
• a very powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor,
• a large 6000 mAh battery with 90W fast charging,
• top gaming performance at a lower price,
• a reasonable price/quality ratio.

This is the best choice if you care about flagship components but don’t want to exceed 2000 PLN (during promotions).

---

Final Verdict

• If you want the best POCO 2025, choose F8 Pro.
• If you want the best value for money, choose F7 Pro.
• If you mainly care about a 2K display, F7 Pro wins — F8 Pro has a brighter screen but lower resolution.
• If you care about camera versatility, there’s no discussion — F8 Pro with a telephoto lens definitely wins.

---

FAQ — Frequently Asked Questions

⭐ 1. Which POCO has a better camera — F7 Pro or F8 Pro?

Definitely F8 Pro. It has a 50 MP telephoto lens with 2× optical zoom and better stabilization modes.
F7 Pro only has a main camera + ultra-wide.

---

⭐ 2. Does POCO F7 Pro support eSIM?

No. It only supports 2× nanoSIM.
eSIM works only in POCO F8 Pro.

---

⭐ 3. Which model has a better battery?

F8 Pro has a larger battery (6210 mAh) and faster charging of 100W + reverse charging.
F7 Pro has 6000 mAh and 90W.

---

⭐ 4. Which screen is better?

• F7 Pro — higher WQHD+ resolution and pixel density (ideal for content).
• F8 Pro — much higher brightness (3500 nits) and better outdoor visibility.

The choice depends on your priorities.

---

⭐ 5. Is it worth paying extra for F8 Pro?

Yes, if you care about the best cameras, eSIM, performance, and charging.
If you want to spend less and have a great 2K screen — F7 Pro is still excellent.

---

⭐ 6. Which model performs better in gaming?

F8 Pro, thanks to the Adreno 830 GPU, is more stable during long sessions and heats up less.
F7 Pro still delivers flagship performance, but F8 Pro wins in 3D gaming.

---

⭐ 7. Do both models have IP68 water resistance?

Yes — both F7 Pro and F8 Pro have IP68 (submersion 1.5 m for 30 min).