Category: Comparisons

The biggest difference between the iPhone 18 Pro and the 17 Pro is the main camera with a variable aperture, the first such mechanism in iPhone history. In addition, there is the A20 Pro chip with steam cooling and longer battery life: up to 34 hours of video playback instead of 31 in the seventeen.

The casing has not changed at all. Both phones have identical dimensions, the same screen, the same zoom range, and the same front camera. This comparison is therefore shorter than it might seem, and comes down to three areas: camera, performance, and battery.

Below is the full specification table, commentary on each real change, a list of things that remain unchanged, and an answer to the question of whether switching from the seventeen makes sense.

iPhone 18 Pro vs iPhone 17 Pro: comparison table

The data comes from the official Apple specification pages and the manufacturer’s comparison table.

Camera: variable aperture and what it really offers

This is the only change in this comparison that you’ll see in the photos, not in the benchmark. The main 48 MP Fusion camera in the iPhone 18 Pro switches between four aperture values: ƒ/1.48, ƒ/1.8, ƒ/2.8, and ƒ/4.0. The iPhone 17 Pro has a fixed aperture, like every previous iPhone.

In practice, it works both ways. At ƒ/1.48, more light hits the sensor than in any previous iPhone, which saves photos in low light and indoors. At ƒ/4.0, the depth of field increases, so in a group photo or macro shot, the entire frame remains sharp, not just the foreground. Previously, such background blur or its absence had to be simulated programmatically in portrait mode.

Apple has added Pro controls: manual adjustment of aperture, shutter speed, and white balance, as well as a histogram preview. This is a set that previously required a third-party app.

The rest of the optical layout remains unchanged. The ultra-wide Fusion 48 MP and the Fusion 48 MP telephoto lens with a focal length of 100 mm are the same as in the seventeenth model, as is the entire zoom range: 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x, and 8x.

Performance: A20 Pro and Vapor Cooling

The iPhone 18 Pro received the A20 Pro chip instead of the A19 Pro. Apple describes it as the most powerful and energy-efficient chip in iPhone history, built for AI computing. A key architectural change is the dual 16-core Neural Engine instead of a single one, along with Neural Accelerator accelerators.

Additionally, there is vapor cooling. This is more important than it sounds, and it’s not just about benchmark results. The vapor chamber dissipates heat from around the chip, allowing the phone to maintain peak performance longer before it starts to throttle. This is noticeable during extended 4K video recording and gaming, which is precisely where iPhones have throttled after several minutes for years.

Fair warning: Apple does not publish a percentage comparison of the A20 Pro with the A19 Pro. The numbers circulating online refer either to the parameters of the production process itself or to comparisons with much older generations. If you use the phone for browsing, photos, and social media, you won’t notice a difference in everyday use.

Battery and Charging

Here, the change is measurable and directly provided by Apple.

The Max version gained the most, with as much as six hours. That’s a difference of one additional evening without a charger. Part of this gain is due to the larger battery, which is why the weight has increased: 249 g instead of 231 g in the Pro Max and 211 g instead of 204 g in the Pro version.

Wired charging is faster: up to 50% in about 15 minutes with a 60 W or higher power adapter with voltage regulation. Wireless charging remains unchanged, at up to 25 W via MagSafe and the same via Qi2. This is good news for your wallet, as chargers do not need to be replaced.

What Has Not Changed

This list is longer than the list of changes and is worth reading before deciding to upgrade.

• Screen. The same 6.3-inch diagonal, the same OLED Super Retina XDR technology, and the same ProMotion up to 120 Hz.
• Body. Unibody aluminum, Ceramic Shield 2 on the front with three times higher scratch resistance than the iPhone 16 Pro, Ceramic Shield on the back. The same in both generations.
• Dimensions. Identical to the tenth of a millimeter, more on that shortly.
• Zoom range. 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x, and 8x in both phones.
• Front camera. Center Stage 18 MP in both generations.
• Resistance. IP68 up to 6 meters for 30 minutes.
• Wireless charging. Up to 25 W via MagSafe and Qi2.
• Memory. The same range from 256 GB to 2 TB, with no 128 GB version in either model.
• Face ID. Still in Dynamic Island, not under the screen.

Price: iPhone 18 Pro vs iPhone 17 Pro

The increase is 500 PLN at entry level and remains at every memory level.

It is worth noting that the iPhone 18 Pro costs exactly as much as the iPhone 17 Pro Max did a year earlier. For the same amount, you are choosing between a newer phone in a smaller body and an older one with a larger screen.

The full price list of both models of the eighteen, along with the Max version and the foldable iPhone Duo, is detailed in the text iPhone 18 Pro price in Poland.

Is it worth switching from the iPhone 17 Pro to the 18 Pro?

The answer depends on what you use the phone for, but it is quite clear.

It is worth it if you earn from photos or videos. The variable aperture plus Pro controls are a real tool, not just cosmetics. Additionally, there is steam cooling that maintains performance during longer recordings, and six extra hours of battery life in the Max version.

It is not worth it if you use the phone normally. The screen is the same, the body is the same, the front camera is the same, the zoom is the same, and the wireless charging is the same. With a jump of one generation, you pay 500 PLN more for a camera feature that you may never consciously use.

It is worth considering if you are switching from the iPhone 16 Pro or older. Then the difference accumulates over two generations and also includes the unibody aluminum case, Ceramic Shield 2, and Center Stage 18 MP in the front. Our text comparison of the iPhone 16 Pro and 17 Pro will be helpful here.

Accessories: what you will transfer from the seventeenth

The casing has not changed, so the case from the iPhone 17 Pro fits, MagSafe accessories do too. The exception is the glass and camera frame — the camera island has grown, and you need to buy the version for the eighteenth. We laid out the entire list of what you will transfer and what you won’t, with dimensions and how to check a specific model, in a separate guide: whether the case from the iPhone 17 Pro fits the iPhone 18 Pro.

Summary

1. The variable aperture is the only change you will see in the photos. Four values from ƒ/1.48 to ƒ/4.0 plus manual Pro control.
2. A20 Pro with steam cooling and dual Neural Engine. Apple does not provide a percentage comparison with A19 Pro, so be cautious with the numbers from the web.
3. Battery lasts 3 hours longer in Pro and 6 hours longer in Pro Max. At the cost of 7 and 18 grams of weight.
4. Casing, screen, zoom, front camera, and wireless charging unchanged. The list of unchanged items is longer than the list of new features.
5. Price increased by 500 PLN. 6,299 PLN instead of 5,799 PLN for the 256 GB version.
6. When switching, you only need to buy the glass for the camera. You transfer the case and MagSafe accessories without purchases.

FAQ

What is the difference between the iPhone 18 Pro and the 17 Pro?

Three things: a main camera with a variable aperture of ƒ/1.48 to ƒ/4.0, an A20 Pro chip with vapor cooling and a dual Neural Engine, and longer battery life, up to 34 hours of video playback instead of 31. The screen, casing, zoom, and front camera are the same.

Does the iPhone 18 Pro have a larger screen than the 17 Pro?

No. Both models have 6.3 inches, and the Max versions have 6.9 inches. The same OLED Super Retina XDR technology and the same ProMotion up to 120 Hz.

What is a variable aperture in a camera?

It is a mechanism that changes the size of the opening through which light enters the sensor. A wide-open aperture (ƒ/1.48) lets in more light and blurs the background, while a closed aperture (ƒ/4.0) provides greater depth of field, meaning the entire frame is sharp. The iPhone 18 Pro does this mechanically, while earlier models simulated the effect programmatically.

How much heavier is the iPhone 18 Pro compared to the 17 Pro?

By 7 grams: 211 g instead of 204 g. In the Max version, the difference is 18 grams, 249 g instead of 231 g. This is due to the larger battery and vapor chamber, not a change in the shape of the casing.

Is it worth paying extra for the iPhone 18 Pro?

If you photograph or record professionally, yes, because the variable aperture and vapor cooling are real tools for work. For regular use, the 500 PLN difference mainly buys you camera functionality, which you may consciously choose not to use.

Does the iPhone 18 Pro have better zoom than the 17 Pro?

No. Both phones offer the same optical zoom range: 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x, and 8x, with a 48 MP Fusion telephoto lens with a focal length of 100 mm.

Does the case from the iPhone 17 Pro fit the 18 Pro?

Yes. The body dimensions are identical: 150.0 × 71.9 × 8.75 mm. Only the camera glass does not fit because the camera island has grown.

Does the iPhone 18 Pro have Face ID under the screen?

No. The TrueDepth module still sits in the Dynamic Island, just like in the iPhone 17 Pro. The Dynamic Island has received a new incarnation and can track up to three Live Events simultaneously.

Sources: official specifications for the iPhone 18 Pro and 18 Pro Max, iPhone comparison table on apple.com/pl (chips, battery, dimensions, weight, zoom range, front camera), iPhone 18 Pro purchase page (prices).

In the battle of Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra vs Z Fold 8, both phones share the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, but the Ultra has larger screens (8″ and 6.5″), a 200 MP camera with a telephoto lens, and a slimmer body. The Z Fold 8, on the other hand, is cheaper, lighter, and more compact.

In short: choose the Ultra for the camera and the largest screen, and the Z Fold 8 for the lower price (from 8749 PLN compared to 9599 PLN) and lighter weight. The rest of the specifications are almost identical.

Samsung showcased both foldables at the Galaxy Unpacked event on July 22, 2026 (you can find the full official specification comparison on Samsung’s website). Pre-orders started the same day, and sales begin in August. This is the first time the Z Fold series gets an Ultra variant, so the question of “which one to choose” is particularly relevant this year.

In this comparison of Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra vs Z Fold 8, we break down both phones into their components: screens, performance, cameras, battery, design, software, and price. At the end, you will find a clear recommendation on who each one is for.

Key differences at a glance

In short: Ultra has a larger screen, better camera, and slimmer design. Z Fold 8 offers a lower price, lighter weight, and a more pocket-friendly format. The rest, including the processor, memory, and system, is nearly identical.

Full specifications: Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra vs Z Fold 8

Data confirmed in the specifications of both models (GSMArena: Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Fold 8):

Screens and format: 8 inches vs wider 7.6 inches

This is the first thing you will feel in your hand. The Z Fold 8 Ultra has a larger main screen of 8 inches and an external 6.5 inches, while the Z Fold 8 opts for a wider, more square 7.6-inch panel (4:3) and a smaller front of 5.5 inches.

The external screen is the one you use most often in a foldable phone. Here, the Ultra definitely wins: the 6.5-inch front functions like a regular smartphone, without the need to constantly unfold the phone. The smaller 5.5-inch panel of the Z Fold 8 is convenient for one-handed use, but can feel cramped for longer typing sessions.

When unfolded, both displays are LTPO AMOLED 2X with a refresh rate of 1-120 Hz and a peak brightness of 3000 nits. They differ in format: the Z Fold 8 targets a 4:3 ratio that is comfortable for reading and multitasking, while the Ultra simply offers more workspace.

Conclusion: If you mainly use the phone in its folded form, the larger front of the Ultra makes a real difference in everyday comfort. The wider screen of the Z Fold 8 is also great for content and documents.

Format and ergonomics: classic Ultra vs wider Z Fold 8

Besides the diagonal itself, the shape matters. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra maintains the classic, tall, and narrow format of foldables known from previous generations. The Z Fold 8 is a novelty, as it leans towards a wider, more square screen with a 4:3 aspect ratio.

In practice, this means a different way of using it. The tall Ultra in its folded form resembles an ordinary, slim smartphone and fits comfortably in the hand and pocket. The wider Z Fold 8 is shorter, making it easier to handle with one hand, but it takes up more width.

When unfolded, the 4:3 format of the Z Fold 8 is great for reading and working with documents, as it is closer to a sheet of paper. The larger, 8-inch Ultra, on the other hand, provides the most space for splitting the screen between apps.

Tip: If you often write and read, test both formats in person. The difference in screen proportions is noticeable from the first moment, and it is often this, rather than dry specifications, that determines your choice.

Performance: the same processor, the same power

There is no contest here. Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy with the same RAM (12 or 16 GB) and the same storage options (256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB in UFS 4.x standard).

In practice, this means identical system fluidity, gaming speed, and multitasking capabilities. Several windows side by side on a large screen, demanding games, heavy graphic applications. Both foldables will handle this just as well.

The only theoretical difference is heat management under prolonged load, as the thinner Ultra design has less space for cooling. However, in everyday use, you won’t feel this in any noticeable way.

Cameras: 200 MP with telephoto vs dual 50 MP setup

This is the biggest difference between the phones and the most common reason for the extra cost of the Ultra. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra has a main 200 MP camera and a dedicated 3x telephoto lens, which you won’t find in the Z Fold 8.

The Z Fold 8 Ultra leads with a setup consisting of a main 200 MP sensor (f/1.7, OIS), a 50 MP ultra-wide (f/1.9, 120°), and a 10 MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. This is a fully-fledged, versatile system that can handle landscapes, portraits, and close-ups.

You will appreciate the 3x telephoto lens the most at concerts, while sightseeing, or with portraits that have a natural perspective. This is where the digital zoom of the Z Fold 8 starts to lose details, while the Ultra’s optics maintain sharpness.

The Z Fold 8 has a more modest, yet still good setup: a main 50 MP sensor (f/1.8, OIS) with 2x zoom achieved from the sensor and an ultra-wide 50 MP. It lacks a dedicated telephoto lens, so distant zooms rely on digital zoom.

The selfie cameras are identical: both phones have two 10 MP cameras, one on the external screen and one inside.

• Z Fold 8 Ultra, 200 MP, 3x telephoto lens, more detail and better optical zoom.
• Z Fold 8, solid main 50 MP and ultra-wide, but without a telephoto lens.

Conclusion: If you take a lot of photos, especially with zoom, the Ultra is clearly the better choice. For occasional photos and social media, the Z Fold 8 is more than sufficient.

Battery and Charging: Slight Advantage for Ultra

The batteries are similar. The Z Fold 8 Ultra has a 5000 mAh battery, while the Z Fold 8 has a slightly smaller one, 4800 mAh. Both charge wired at 45 W and support wireless charging.

The 200 mAh difference is practically cosmetic. The Ultra theoretically has a bit more reserve, but it also powers a larger, 8-inch screen, so the actual battery life of both phones will be very similar.

It’s worth remembering that foldables with large screens tend to consume energy quickly during intensive multitasking. Both models would benefit from a wireless charger on the desk and a power bank in the backpack for a longer day out.

Design and Dimensions: Slimmer Ultra vs Lighter Z Fold 8

An interesting paradox. The Z Fold 8 Ultra is thinner (8.9 mm when folded), but heavier (214 g), while the Z Fold 8 is thicker (9.7 mm) but lighter (201 g).

The Ultra is a classic, tall format foldable in a premium version, emphasizing a slim profile. The Z Fold 8 leans towards a wider, shorter, and more compact design that is comfortably operated with one hand when folded.

Both phones use a frame and hinge made with Flex Titanium technology and have an IP48 resistance certification (protection against objects larger than 1 mm and immersion in water, but this is not full dustproofing). This is the same high standard of workmanship in both models.

Regardless of your choice, a foldable phone costing 9,000 to 12,000 PLN should be protected from day one. Dedicated cases and glass protectors can be found in the accessories categories for Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Galaxy Z Fold 8. At Home Screen, you can order them with free delivery for orders over 100 PLN, and the store has a 99.8% positive rating on Allegro and 4.9/5 on Google.

Software and updates: no differences

In terms of software, the phones are identical. Both run on Android 17 with the One UI 9 overlay and will receive 7 years of system updates.

This is one of the longest support periods on the market, so regardless of your choice, the phone will stay with you for years. All Galaxy AI features, multitasking modes, and foldable screen capabilities are the same in both models.

Price and variants: how much is the upgrade to Ultra

Prices in Poland are as follows:

Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra:
– 12/256 GB, 9599 PLN
– 12/512 GB, 10499 PLN
– 16/1 TB, 12199 PLN

Galaxy Z Fold 8:
– 12/256 GB, 8749 PLN
– 12/512 GB, 9599 PLN
– 16/1 TB, 11299 PLN

The surcharge for the basic Ultra is about 850 PLN compared to the base Z Fold 8. Interesting fact: the Ultra in the 12/256 variant costs exactly the same as the Z Fold 8 in the 12/512 version, so when comparing variants, it’s worth looking at the specific memory configuration.

Which Samsung foldable to choose?

The decision comes down to a few simple questions:

• Do you want the best camera and the largest screen? Choose the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, especially for the 200 MP sensor and 3x telephoto lens.
• Is a lower price and lighter weight important to you? Go for the Z Fold 8, you’ll save money and get a lighter phone.
• Do you mainly use your phone when it’s folded? The larger 6.5-inch front of the Ultra is more convenient for everyday use.
• Do you value a comfortable, wide screen for reading? The 4:3 format of the Z Fold 8 works great.
• Do you occasionally take photos and count every penny? The Z Fold 8 offers 90% of the Ultra experience at a lower price.

Conclusion: The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is the choice for those who want the absolute maximum, mainly the 200 MP camera and larger screens. The Z Fold 8 is a more reasonably priced foldable for those who only need a good camera and prefer a lighter, more compact design.

FAQ: frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and the Z Fold 8?

The Ultra has larger screens (8″ and 6.5″), a main 200 MP camera with a 3x telephoto lens, and a slimmer body. The Z Fold 8 is cheaper, lighter, and has a wider 7.6″ screen in a 4:3 format, but without a telephoto lens.

Do the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Fold 8 have the same processor?

Yes. Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy with 12 or 16 GB of RAM. The performance is practically identical.

How much does the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra cost, and how much does the Z Fold 8 cost?

The Z Fold 8 Ultra starts at 9599 PLN (12/256 GB), while the Z Fold 8 starts at 8749 PLN (12/256 GB). The most expensive 1 TB variants are 12199 PLN and 11299 PLN, respectively.

Is it worth paying extra for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra?

It is worth it if you care about the 200 MP camera, telephoto lens, and the largest screens. If you only take occasional photos and value a lower price and lighter weight, the Z Fold 8 is the better choice.

Which foldable has a better camera?

Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. It has a 200 MP main sensor and a dedicated 3x telephoto lens, while the Z Fold 8 features a 50 MP main camera and an ultra-wide lens, without a telephoto lens.

Will both phones receive the same number of updates?

Yes. Both the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Fold 8 run on Android 17 with One UI 9 and are promised 7 years of system updates.

When will the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Fold 8 go on sale?

Samsung unveiled both models on July 22, 2026, and pre-orders started the same day. Regular sales in Poland will begin in August 2026.

Which foldable is lighter and which is thinner?

The Z Fold 8 is lighter (201 g compared to 214 g), but thicker when folded (9.7 mm compared to 8.9 mm). Therefore, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is slimmer, although slightly heavier.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is the more powerful device: larger and brighter screen (7.0″, 165 Hz, 5000 nits), more efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite, 5000 mAh battery, and 68 W charging. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 offers a lighter design (188 g), a more mature One UI 8, and up to 7 years of updates. Choose Razr if performance, battery, and charging speed matter to you. Opt for Flip 7 if you value the Samsung ecosystem and the longest support on the market.

Both flip phones target the same customer: you want a compact phone that fits in a small pocket but unfolds to provide a full-sized screen. The differences lie in the details — and these can sway your choice in everyday use. Below, we break down both models into their components — screens, performance, cameras, battery, software, and price — and suggest which one to choose for yourself.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 — comparison table

The table already shows the balance of power: Razr wins in hardware parameters (display, processor, battery, charging), while Flip 7 defends itself with weight, software, and support duration. Now for the details.

Screens — Razr focuses on brightness and fluidity

The biggest difference is the screens. The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a 7.0-inch internal AMOLED with a refresh rate of 165 Hz and a peak brightness of 5000 nits. These are some of the best parameters among foldables, also compared to classic flagships. The 4.0-inch external screen also refreshes at 165 Hz and reaches 3000 nits, so you can handle almost everything from it without unfolding the phone.

The Galaxy Z Flip 7 received a 6.9-inch internal panel at 120 Hz and a new, “edge-to-edge” external screen of 4.1 inches. These are very good displays, but on paper they fall short of Motorola in brightness and fluidity. In practice, not everyone will notice the difference between 120 vs 165 Hz, however, the brightness of 5000 vs 2600 nits is noticeable in full sunlight.

Conclusion: For watching content and using in the sun, the Razr 70 Ultra is better. The Flip 7 makes up for it with a well-crafted external screen and apps that work on the cover.

Regardless of the choice, it is worth protecting the flexible screen of the foldable from day one with a dedicated film — rigid tempered glass does not work well on a bending panel.

External Screen — Phone Operation Without Unfolding

In flip phones, everyday convenience is determined by the external screen, as you respond to messages, check notifications, and take photos with the main camera from it. The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra features a 4.0-inch cover with a refresh rate of 165 Hz and a brightness of 3000 nits, on which you can run practically any Android application.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 has opted for a new 4.1-inch panel, more tightly surrounding the camera module, with refined widgets and quick access to Galaxy AI. Samsung has been developing this interface for several generations, so it is more organized, although it by default limits the launching of full applications. Motorola offers more freedom in this regard, while Samsung provides more consistency.

Performance — Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Exynos 2500

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite, Qualcomm’s top chip built on a 3 nm process. It is the most powerful processor to hit a foldable flip phone, with plenty of power for gaming and years of use.

Galaxy Z Flip 7 is powered by the proprietary Samsung Exynos 2500, also at 3 nm. It is fast and energy-efficient, but in performance tests and under load, it usually falls behind the Snapdragon 8 Elite, especially in gaming and maintaining long-term performance. For everyday tasks, social media, and photography, both chips are more than sufficient.

Both phones have 12 GB of RAM (the Razr also comes in a 16 GB variant) and 512 GB of storage, with no card slot. The Flip 7 offers a cheaper 256 GB variant for those who find that capacity sufficient.

Cameras — Motorola adds a 50 MP ultra-wide

On paper, the cameras look similar: both phones have a main 50 MP sensor with optical stabilization. The difference lies in the second lens. The Razr 70 Ultra has a 50 MP ultra-wide camera, while the Flip 7 opts for 12 MP. This translates to more details on the Motorola side in wide-angle and macro photos.

Additionally, there is the front camera: 50 MP in the Razr versus 10 MP in the Flip 7. In practice, however, selfies from both flip phones are most often taken with the main camera, using the external screen as a viewfinder, where software matters more than the number of megapixels.

Samsung has had an advantage in image processing and color consistency between lenses for years, and One UI offers a rich Pro mode and AI tools. Motorola makes up for it with hardware and collaboration with Pantone for color reproduction. It’s a close battle: more “raw” hardware is provided by the Razr, while more mature camera software comes from Samsung.

Tip: The protruding camera module on flip phones can easily get scratched when closing. A separate lens protector costs a few zlotys and saves blurry photos.

Battery and charging — a clear advantage for Razr

Here Motorola clearly wins. The Razr 70 Ultra has a 5000 mAh battery, 68 W wired charging, and 30 W wireless charging. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 has 4300 mAh, 25 W wired, and 15 W wireless.

The difference is real: the larger battery in Motorola means longer usage time, and over twice as fast wired charging (68 vs 25 W) significantly shortens the full charging time — the Razr replenishes its battery much faster than the Flip 7. For many people, this is a decisive argument — foldables inherently have less space for batteries, so every additional mAh and watt of power counts.

Samsung explains the lower specifications by emphasizing the slimness and longevity of the battery, but in the everyday “from morning to evening” scenario, the Razr offers more peace of mind. Both flip phones can be charged with a universal GaN charger with USB Power Delivery, and it’s worth choosing a model with at least 30 W of power.

Design, weight, and durability

Both phones have an IP48 certification, meaning they are resistant to dust and immersion up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes, but without full dust protection like classic flagship models with IP68. This is still a significant advancement for foldables.

The Galaxy Z Flip 7 is lighter (188 g) and slimmer when folded, which is noticeable in the pocket. The Motorola weighs 199 g but tempts with materials: Alcantara finish and natural wood veneer in the Cocoa version. It’s one of the most distinctive designs on the market.

The hinge in both models is refined and allows the screen to be held at any angle (the “flex” mode). Samsung has been perfecting the mechanism for years and minimizing the crease in the middle of the screen; Motorola compensates with a flat fold without a gap.

Conclusion: Flip 7 wins in terms of agility and weight, Razr 70 Ultra — in character and materials. It’s an aesthetic choice as much as a technical one.

Software and updates — Samsung’s advantage

The biggest advantage of the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is support. Samsung promises 7 years of system and security updates and the One UI 8 overlay with an extensive Galaxy AI package. This means a phone that stays current for most of the decade and a realistically higher resale value.

Motorola opts for a clean, lightweight Hello UI interface with Moto AI features and convenient external screen handling. Drawbacks? Shorter update support than Samsung — if you plan to keep the phone for 5–6 years, that’s a significant downside.

The ecosystem also favors Samsung: integration with Galaxy Watch, Buds, tablets, and DeX services is more complete. Motorola offers a simpler, but very intuitive environment and fewer unnecessary applications (so-called bloatware).

Price — what you get for your money

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is sold in Poland in the configuration 16/512 GB at a retail price of 5999 PLN, although during promotions and from operators, it goes down to around 5000 PLN. There is also a global variant of 12/512 GB.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 has been on the market since July 2025, so its prices have clearly dropped. The 12/256 GB variant can be purchased today for around 3600–4300 PLN, and the 12/512 GB for about 4100–4500 PLN (the retail price for 256 GB is 4299 PLN).

This significantly changes the equation: at a similar price point, the Flip 7 is currently 1000–2000 PLN cheaper than the Razr 70 Ultra. You buy the Samsung for a lower price, longer support, and a lighter design, while the Motorola offers the strongest hardware (screen, processor, battery, charging) — but at an additional cost. It’s worth checking prices regularly, as foldables are often subject to promotions and trade-in offers.

Which foldable to choose: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or Galaxy Z Flip 7?

There is no single winner — it all depends on your priorities.

• Choose Motorola Razr 70 Ultra if: you want the most powerful flip phone, the brightest and smoothest display, the largest battery, and the fastest charging, and you like the design with Alcantara or wood.
• Choose Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 if: you want a lower price (today ~3600–4300 PLN), value lightness and slimness, need 7 years of updates, and are in the Samsung ecosystem (watch, headphones, mature One UI, and Galaxy AI).
• Tie if: you mainly take photos with the main camera and use the external screen — both models will perform excellently, and you will make your decision based on design and price.

Regardless of your choice, the flip phone is a delicate construction with a flexible screen and hinge — a case and screen protector are not a luxury here, but a necessity. Accessories for both models can be found in the categories Galaxy Z Flip 7 and Motorola Razr at homescreen.pl.

Summary

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 are currently the two most interesting flip phones on the market, but with different characters. The main conclusions:

• Hardware: Razr 70 Ultra wins with its display (7.0″, 165 Hz, 5000 nits), processor (Snapdragon 8 Elite), battery (5000 mAh), and charging (68 W).
• Longevity: Galaxy Z Flip 7 offers 7 years of updates, a lighter design (188 g), and a mature Samsung ecosystem.
• Cameras: balanced — Razr adds an ultra-wide 50 MP, Samsung has better photography software.
• Price: Galaxy Z Flip 7 is clearly cheaper today (~3600–4300 PLN) and has longer support; Razr 70 Ultra is the most powerful device, but at a premium (~5000–5999 PLN).

When choosing either model, think about protection right away — cases and films for Galaxy Z Flip 7 and accessories for Motorola Razr are readily available at homescreen.pl. Free shipping on orders over 100 PLN, InPost, and shipping within 24 hours.

FAQ — frequently asked questions about Razr 70 Ultra and Z Flip 7

Which phone is better: Razr 70 Ultra or Z Flip 7?

It depends on your priorities. Razr 70 Ultra is better in terms of hardware — it has a brighter and faster screen, a more powerful processor, a larger battery, and faster charging. Z Flip 7 wins in terms of lightness, 7 years of updates, and the Samsung ecosystem.

Which has a better screen?

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra. Its internal screen is 7.0 inches, 165 Hz, and peaks at 5000 nits brightness, while Galaxy Z Flip 7 offers 6.9 inches and 120 Hz. Samsung’s external screen, however, is very well optimized software-wise.

Which one gets updates longer?

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 — with a guarantee of 7 years of system and security updates. Motorola offers shorter support, which is worth considering if you plan to use the phone for many years.

Are both phones waterproof?

Both have an IP48 rating, are resistant to immersion in water up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes, but do not have full dust protection like flagships with IP68. Protect them from sand and particles that may get into the hinge.

Which flip phone has a better battery?

Razr 70 Ultra — has a 5000 mAh battery and 68 W charging (wired) and 30 W (wireless). Galaxy Z Flip 7 has 4300 mAh and 25 W and 15 W, so it charges noticeably slower.

What accessories are worth buying for a foldable phone?

First of all, a case that protects the hinge and frame, as well as a film for the flexible inner screen (not tempered glass). Screen protection for the outer display and camera lenses will also be useful. You can find a full selection in the accessories categories for Galaxy Z Flip 7 and Motorola Razr at homescreen.pl.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 is set to debut on July 22, 2026, at Galaxy Unpacked in London, alongside Galaxy Z Fold 8, Z Flip 8, and Watch Ultra 2. According to leaks, the Classic version with a rotating bezel is disappearing, the battery is increasing by about 23%, and the watch retains two sizes: 40 and 44 mm. These are leak data; Samsung has not yet confirmed them.

Summer is traditionally the time for Samsung’s watches and foldables. Revolution or evolution? Judging by the leaks, it seems more like a steady step forward rather than a upheaval, but a few changes really make a difference. Below we have gathered everything that is currently known about the new watch: the expected release date, specifications from leaks, expected price, and how it differs from Galaxy Watch 8.

When is the Galaxy Watch 9 premiere?

When will the Galaxy Watch 9 hit stores? The watch is set to be unveiled on July 22, 2026, during the Galaxy Unpacked conference. According to reports, Samsung is organizing a summer Unpacked in London, and the new model will appear on stage alongside the next generation of foldables.

A signal that the premiere is near was the passage of the device attributed to the Watch 9 series through the American FCC in mid-June 2026. Certification with the FCC is usually one of the last steps before the official debut.

Note: As of the publication date, Samsung has not yet sent out an official invitation to Unpacked nor confirmed the name “Galaxy Watch 9”. Treat the date of July 22 and the entire specification as highly probable leaks, not data confirmed by the manufacturer. Official information will appear on the Samsung newsroom.

Pre-sale usually starts on the day of the conference, and retail sales 1–2 weeks later. If the pattern repeats, you will be able to buy the watch in stores at the beginning of August 2026.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 — specifications from leaks

The new model is expected to be an evolution, not a revolution. Samsung is refining a proven design instead of turning it upside down. The table below collects the most important parameters reported by foreign technology publications.

It is worth remembering that some of this data comes from individual sources and may still change. The biggest doubts concern the processor — more on that below.

Processor — Exynos W1000 or Snapdragon Wear Elite?

This is the most contentious point of the entire puzzle. The leaks are divided here, and there is no single, coherent version.

Some sources claim that the watch will stick with the Exynos W1000 chip, known from the Galaxy Watch 7 and Watch 8, while the new Snapdragon Wear Elite chip in 3 nm lithography will be exclusive to the more powerful Galaxy Watch Ultra 2. Other reports suggest that it is the standard Watch 9 that will receive the new Qualcomm processor with significantly higher performance.

Tip: If you care about maximum smoothness and the latest chip, wait for the official specification on July 22. Only Samsung will determine which chip powers the new watch. Until then, treat any information about the processor as unconfirmed.

In everyday use, the difference between these chips will be felt mainly in AI functions and heavier applications. For notifications, workouts, and health measurements, either of them will suffice.

Galaxy Watch 9 Classic — the end of the bezel version

The biggest change in this generation is visible to the naked eye: Samsung is set to abandon the Classic variant with a physical, rotating bezel. This has distinguished the more expensive version of the watch for years and attracted fans of the classic look.

Many people are still searching online for the term “Galaxy Watch 9 Classic,” but according to reports to the FCC, such a model is unlikely to appear in 2026. If you care about the rotating ring, the real options remain older models or the stronger Ultra line.

Instead, the manufacturer is expected to focus on one cohesive design language: a round case, thinner bezels, and touch control via a ring around the screen instead of a physical bezel. This is a decision that simplifies the offering, but not everyone will like it.

Battery and Charging

Battery life is, alongside the processor, the second thing that interests buyers the most. Here, the leaks are optimistic.

• 40 mm version — a cell with a capacity of about 382 mAh, marketed as 400 mAh. Samsung is expected to advertise this as an increase of about 23% compared to the Galaxy Watch 8, whose battery in this size has 325 mAh.
• 44 mm version — a battery of around 435 mAh, which, with a more efficient display and system optimization, should allow for longer usage between charges.

In practice, a larger battery means a real chance for two days of operation with moderate use. For many users, it is this change, rather than the processor, that will determine the sense of switching from an older watch.

Health features and AI

In terms of health, the new watch is expected to continue what Samsung has refined over the last generations. According to leaks, all key sensors are returning:

• ECG — heart rate recording measurement straight from the wrist.
• Blood pressure measurement — a function available after calibration with a traditional sphygmomanometer.
• Saturation (SpO2) — monitoring of blood oxygenation.
• Skin temperature — used, among other things, for sleep and cycle analysis.

A new feature is expected to be a stronger emphasis on AI-supported health analysis — personalized tips regarding sleep, activity, and recovery. The watch is expected to run on Wear OS with the One UI Watch overlay, closely integrated with Galaxy phones.

Galaxy Watch 9 vs Galaxy Watch 8 — what’s changing

If you have the Galaxy Watch 8, the differences are evolutionary. The biggest gain is the battery and tidying up the offer.

For owners of the Watch 8, this is an upgrade “for those who want it,” not a necessity. The longer battery life is tempting, but the sensor set remains at a similar level. The upgrade makes more sense for those with the Galaxy Watch 6 or older devices, where the jump in battery life and performance will be truly noticeable.

Price and availability in Poland

Samsung has not yet announced Polish prices, but leaks indicate a reference point. In the USA, the Bluetooth version is expected to start at 349 dollars, and LTE models are expected to be 30–40 dollars more expensive. In Europe, a price of around 409 euros for the basic variant has appeared.

Translating this to our market and the price of its predecessor, in Poland the new watch should cost approximately 1,499 to 1,699 PLN for the 40 mm Bluetooth version. The 44 mm variant and LTE models will be correspondingly more expensive. This is still an estimate; the official price list will be revealed on the launch day.

What else will Samsung show at Unpacked

Unpacked on July 22 is not just about the watch. On the same day, Samsung is expected to refresh almost the entire line of wearable and foldable devices. The following information also comes from leaks.

• Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 — a more powerful watch with a 47 mm titanium case, an 800 mAh battery, and a new 3 nm chip. You can find details in the text about what we know about Galaxy Watch Ultra 2.
• Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Z Flip 8 — a new generation of foldables with larger batteries and faster charging.
• Galaxy Glasses — Samsung’s first smart glasses, which have been talked about for several months.

If you are choosing between the standard Watch 9 and the Ultra 2, the key differences are battery, durability, and price. The Watch 9 is aimed at everyday wear, while the Ultra 2 is designed for extreme sports and maximum battery life.

Accessories for Galaxy Watch 9 — what to prepare

The new watch is expected to maintain case sizes of 40 and 44 mm, so straps and glasses compatible with the Galaxy Watch 8 should also work with the new generation. We will confirm final compatibility right after the launch.

If you want protection and a replacement strap ready for the first day, check out our categories. You will find accessories for current Samsung models — accessories for Galaxy Watch 8, a wide selection of watch straps, and a comprehensive category of straps, glasses, and bands for Galaxy Watch. We will add and update the new model category with products right after the official premiere.

Summary

Galaxy Watch 9 is shaping up to be a calm, thoughtful upgrade. There are no revolutions here, but there are specific changes: a larger battery, a streamlined offering without the Classic version, and two proven case sizes. The premiere is set to take place on July 22, 2026, at Galaxy Unpacked in London, along with Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the new generation of foldables.

The key takeaways (all based on leaks, without official confirmation from Samsung):

• Premiere: July 22, 2026, at Galaxy Unpacked in London.
• Key changes: battery increased by about 23%, end of the Classic version, two sizes 40 and 44 mm.
• Price: probably starting from about 1,499 PLN for the 40 mm Bluetooth version, based on the predecessor and prices from leaks.

Are you waiting for the new watch? Complete your protection and straps in advance — accessories for Galaxy Watch 8 are available immediately, and we update the new model category right after the premiere.

FAQ — frequently asked questions

When is the Galaxy Watch 9 premiere?
According to leaks, the premiere will take place on July 22, 2026, during Galaxy Unpacked in London. Samsung has not officially confirmed this date yet, but the device passing through the FCC in mid-June suggests that the debut is very close.

How much will the Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 cost?
There is no official price in Poland yet. The Bluetooth version is expected to start at around $349 (409 euros), which in our reality means approximately 1,499 to 1,699 PLN for the 40 mm model. The LTE variant and 44 mm will be more expensive.

Will there be a Galaxy Watch 9 Classic with a rotating bezel?
Probably not. According to FCC filings, Samsung is skipping the Classic version in this generation. If you want a physical, rotating ring, the realistic options are older models or the Ultra line.

What processor does the Galaxy Watch 9 have?
This is still uncertain. Some leaks point to the known Exynos W1000, while others suggest the new Snapdragon Wear Elite in 3 nm lithography. The final answer will only be known during the official premiere.

What is the difference between Galaxy Watch 9 and Watch 8?
The biggest changes are a battery that is about 23% larger and the absence of a Classic version. The case sizes (40 and 44 mm) and the set of health sensors remain similar. This is an evolution, not a revolution.

Do the bands from Galaxy Watch 8 fit Galaxy Watch 9?
Most likely yes. The new model retains the case sizes of 40 and 44 mm, so the bands and glasses for Watch 8 should also fit the new generation. We will confirm the final compatibility after the premiere.

Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro (949 zł) outperforms the base Fit 5 (599 zł) with four features: a larger 1.92″ AMOLED LTPO screen with a brightness of 3,000 nits, a titanium bezel, sapphire glass, and ECG measurement with a depth sensor for diving. The rest of the specifications are very similar: the same 10-day battery, the same Sunflower GPS, over 100 sports modes, and wireless charging in 60 minutes.

If you care about ECG measurement, screen quality, and scratch resistance, the additional 350 zł for the Pro version makes sense. For daily workouts, sleep monitoring, and notifications, the base Huawei Watch Fit 5 is more than sufficient.

After the Polish premiere on May 7, 2026, both watches are available at promotional prices until June 21, 2026. We break them down into their components and suggest which one to choose for the gym, running, swimming, and everyday use.

Huawei Watch Fit 5 and Fit 5 Pro in Poland: price, premiere, and variants

The Polish premiere of both models took place on May 7, 2026. The watches are available at Media Expert, Komputronik, x-kom, RTV Euro AGD, and in the official Huawei store. Along with the premiere, Huawei offered a promotion of -200 PLN valid until June 21, 2026.

The basic Watch Fit 5 is available in four color versions: black, white, silver-green, and purple. The Watch Fit 5 Pro comes in three colors: black, white, and orange (the latter with a microfiber strap).

Tip: The silver-green version of the Watch Fit 5 is made from recycled materials (100% recycled aluminum and 100% recovered nylon), making it a choice for those who value sustainable accessories.

Specifications of Huawei Watch Fit 5 vs Fit 5 Pro: full comparison table

The main differences are in the screen, case materials, and ECG measurement. The battery, GPS, heart rate sensor, sports modes, and charging are identical in both models.

The Pro version is 3.4 g heavier than the base model, a result of the titanium bezel and an additional depth sensor. In everyday use, the weight difference is practically unnoticeable.

Display: 1.82 vs 1.92 inches AMOLED and 2,500 vs 3,000 nits

This is one of the most noticeable differences in everyday use. The Watch Fit 5 Pro has a larger display 1.92 inches with LTPO technology and adaptive refresh rate 1–60 Hz. The base Watch Fit 5 features a classic AMOLED panel 1.82 inches.

The Pro also offers higher peak brightness, 3,000 nits compared to 2,500 nits in the base model. In practice, both screens are well readable in full sunlight, but the Pro version provides a greater margin of comfort in difficult conditions (e.g., cycling in bright sunlight).

The Pro version has slimmer bezels, 1.8 mm, which occupy only 83% of the front panel surface. Visually, the watch looks more premium. The Watch Fit 5 is not ugly, it has a similar rectangular design but with thicker borders.

The second significant difference is the protective glass:

• Watch Fit 5: ceramic glass (durable but prone to scratches when dropped on sand or concrete)
• Watch Fit 5 Pro: 2.5D sapphire glass (very scratch-resistant, premium class)

If you plan to engage in intense outdoor training, MTB cycling, or crossfit with dumbbells, the sapphire glass of the Watch Fit 5 Pro can save you from having to replace the screen after a few months.

Note: LTPO in the Watch Fit 5 Pro not only provides smoother animation but also a significantly longer battery life in AOD mode, with the screen able to drop to 1 Hz when displaying a static watch face.

Materials: titanium vs aluminum and the weight of both watches

The casing of both models is made from aircraft-grade aluminum, but the Pro additionally features a titanium bezel. This creates a real visual and mechanical difference:

• Titanium is a material you won’t find in many watches under 1,000 PLN
• A titanium bezel is corrosion-resistant, hypoallergenic, and has a more premium feel
• Aluminum in the Watch Fit 5 is also lightweight and durable, but more susceptible to visible scratches

The Pro weighs 30.4 g, the base model 27 g. Both are very lightweight compared to typical 45 mm smartwatches (50–60 g), making them suitable for sleep and all-day wear.

The thickness of the case for both models is identical at 9.5 mm, so neither protrudes significantly from the cuff of a shirt. You can comfortably wear them with a suit and at the gym.

ECG and Depth Sensor: Why the Watch Fit 5 Pro is a Different Health Watch

This is a key functional difference between the two watches. The Watch Fit 5 Pro has received two sensors that are not present in the base model:

ECG Sensor (Electrocardiogram)

The Watch Fit 5 Pro allows for recording an ECG directly from the wrist, providing a chart and analysis in 30 seconds:

• Detection of atrial fibrillation (AFib)
• Analysis of arterial stiffness
• Assessment of sinus rhythm risk
• Export of the record to PDF (from the Huawei Health app)

Note: The ECG in the smartwatch does not replace a medical examination but is a very useful screening tool, especially for individuals over 40, athletes, and those with a history of cardiovascular diseases.

The Watch Fit 5 base model does not have EKG. You can only measure basic parameters: resting and active heart rate, SpO2, and HRV (heart rate variability). This is sufficient for most fitness scenarios, but not for heart rhythm analysis.

Depth sensor and diving up to 40 m

The Watch Fit 5 Pro has a built-in depth sensor, which allows for free diving up to 40 meters. This is rare in smartwatches priced under 1,000 PLN; such a feature is usually found in Apple Watch Ultra (from 3,999 PLN) or Garmin Descent (from 4,000 PLN).

The regular Watch Fit 5 has 5 ATM (compliance with ISO 22810:2010), which is sufficient for swimming in a pool and showering, but not for diving. For those engaged in freediving or diving on vacation, the Pro is the only sensible choice.

Want to better protect your watch? Check out the available accessories for Huawei Watch Fit 5 at homescreen.pl, such as the Tech-Protect Defense protective case that will safeguard the screen and case from scratches.

In addition to cases, at homescreen.pl you will also find watch bands (silicone, leather, milanese) that allow you to match the watch’s appearance to your style — from sporty to elegant.

Battery and charging: there are practically no differences here

Both watches have identical battery specifications:

• Up to 10 days with light use (notifications, step tracking)
• Up to 7 days with typical use (training 3 times a week)
• Up to 4 days with Always-On Display
• SuperCharge wireless charging ~60 minutes from 0 to 100%

In practical tests by the editorial team of Benchmark.pl, the Watch Fit 5 Pro achieved around 8 days with mixed usage and GPS enabled during workouts. The Watch Fit 5 should yield a similar result, which is a small difference compared to the manufacturer’s specifications.

The wireless charger is included in the package with both models. It also fits other Huawei watches from the GT and Watch series, so if you have, for example, a Huawei Watch GT 5 or a Watch GT Runner 2, you can use one charger.

Tip: A 10-day battery life is a great result compared to the Apple Watch Series 10 (18–36 hours) or Galaxy Watch 7 (40 hours). If you’re tired of charging your watch every day, the Huawei Watch Fit series is for you.

GPS, sports modes, and health features

The differences here are minimal. Both models share:

• Huawei Sunflower GPS, proprietary positioning system supporting GNSS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo
• Offline maps, load the route before training, works without a phone
• Over 100 sports modes, running, cycling, swimming, yoga, tennis, soccer, crossfit, and mini-workouts with animations
• Automatic activity detection, walking, running, cycling
• Fall detection, with SOS function and emergency notification

What the Watch Fit 5 lacks that the Pro has?

The Pro version has three additional sports features:

1. Golf maps, over 17,000 mapped courses in 50+ countries
2. Professional running and cycling modes, carried over from the Watch GT Runner 2
3. Advanced swimming analysis, pool segmentation, SWOLF, automatic stroke detection

For recreational runners and fitness enthusiasts, the base Watch Fit 5 will offer everything they need. The Pro is an option for golfers, ambitious runners, and triathletes.

Health features common to both models

• TruSleep 5.0, advanced sleep phase analysis (REM, deep, light)
• Pulse Wave Analysis, pulse wave analysis
• Stress monitor and breathing exercises
• Menstrual cycle tracking with prediction
• Emotion analysis (new in 2026)

Compatibility with iOS and Android: what you should know

Both watches work with iPhone (iOS 13+) and Android phones (8.0+). However, there is an important caveat:

On Android, you need to download the Huawei Health app outside of Google Play, directly from the manufacturer’s website (APK file). This is a result of US sanctions on Huawei and the lack of Google Mobile Services.

On iOS, the app is available in the App Store and works normally, but some features are limited (e.g., replying to WhatsApp messages requires Android). Full iCloud Health integration is not available, but you can export workouts to Strava, Apple Health (via Huawei Health), and other apps.

Note: If you are using an iPhone and care about full integration with the Apple ecosystem, the Apple Watch will be a better choice. However, the Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro for 949 PLN offers ECG measurement, which the Apple Watch SE (2,199 PLN) does not have at all.

Huawei Watch Fit 5 vs Fit 5 Pro: which one to choose?

Here are three simple scenarios that will help you make a decision:

Choose Huawei Watch Fit 5 (599 PLN) if:

• You are looking for a lightweight smartwatch for everyday use
• You train recreationally (gym 3× a week, jogging, cycling)
• You want to monitor sleep, steps, heart rate, and SpO2
• You do not need ECG measurement or diving
• You value a large battery and do not want to charge it daily
• Your budget is 600–700 PLN

Choose Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro (949 PLN) if:

• You care about ECG measurement and heart rhythm analysis
• You dive or plan to freedive up to 40 m
• You play golf and need course maps
• You value premium materials (titanium, sapphire glass)
• You want a better screen (1.92″ LTPO 3 000 nits)
• Your budget is 900–1,200 PLN

Choose a different watch if:

• You use an iPhone and want full integration → Apple Watch Series 10 or Huawei Watch 5
• You need Wear OS and Google Pay → Galaxy Watch 7 or Pixel Watch 3
• You run long distances with advanced metrics → Huawei Watch GT Runner 2
• You are looking for a larger classic watch → Huawei Watch GT 6
• You have a smaller budget (up to 400 PLN) and need a solid smart band → Huawei Watch Fit 3

Summary: is the additional 350 PLN for Watch Fit 5 Pro worth it?

Huawei Watch Fit 5 and Fit 5 Pro are two very good smartwatches at affordable prices, with minimal differences in sports features and identical batteries. The decision depends on three factors:

1. Do you need EKG? If yes, the additional cost of 350 PLN makes sense and Pro is the only choice
2. Do you care about a premium display? LTPO 1.92″ with sapphire glass is a noticeable difference in everyday use
3. Do you dive? Pro is the only option with a depth sensor at this price

If you don’t need EKG or diving, the base Huawei Watch Fit 5 for 599 PLN will be fully sufficient. For athletes, health monitors, golfers, and divers, Pro is a great investment worth the extra cost.

Our choice: For recreational users, Huawei Watch Fit 5 at the price of 599 PLN. For active athletes or those caring for their heart, Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro for 949 PLN. Regardless of your choice, protect your watch with a Tech-Protect case and check the full range of accessories for Huawei Watch Fit 5 at homescreen.pl →

FAQ, frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Huawei Watch Fit 5 and Fit 5 Pro?

Watch Fit 5 Pro has a larger 1.92″ AMOLED LTPO display (3,000 nits), a titanium bezel, sapphire glass, ECG measurement, and a depth sensor for diving (40 m). The base Watch Fit 5 has a 1.82″ display (2,500 nits), aluminum, ceramic glass, and does not have ECG or a depth sensor.

How much do Huawei Watch Fit 5 and Fit 5 Pro cost?

On promotion until June 21, 2026: Watch Fit 5, 599 PLN, Watch Fit 5 Pro, 949 PLN. Regular prices are 799 PLN and 1,149 PLN, respectively.

Does Huawei Watch Fit 5 have ECG?

No. The base Huawei Watch Fit 5 measures heart rate, SpO2, and heart rate variability (HRV), but does not have an ECG sensor. ECG measurement is only available in the Pro version.

Does Huawei Watch Fit 5 work with iPhone?

Yes. Both models are compatible with iOS 13+ and Android 8.0+. On iOS, the Huawei Health app is available in the App Store. However, some features (e.g., replying on WhatsApp) require Android.

How long does the battery last in Huawei Watch Fit 5 and Fit 5 Pro?

Both models have identical battery life: up to 10 days with light use, up to 7 days with typical use, and up to 4 days with Always-On Display. In practical tests, both versions achieve about 7–8 days with active GPS during workouts.

Is Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro suitable for diving?

Yes, the Watch Fit 5 Pro has a built-in depth sensor and a 5 ATM / IP69 certification, allowing for freediving up to 40 meters. The base Watch Fit 5 only has 5 ATM, which is sufficient for swimming in a pool and showering, but not for diving.

What accessories are worth buying for the Huawei Watch Fit 5?

The most important accessory is a protective case with integrated tempered glass, which protects the screen and case from scratches. On homescreen.pl, Tech-Protect Defense cases (black and transparent) are available for 25 PLN. It’s also worth having an extra strap for a change.