Blog

  • Piano black in the car — how to protect it from scratches?

    Piano black in the car — how to protect it from scratches?

    The most effective protection for piano black in a car is the PianoSkin protective film — a precisely cut PPF kit for self-installation, available from 112 PLN. Piano black is a finish that looks elegant until the first touch — the black, glossy plastic scratches with the slightest contact and collects fingerprints like a magnet.

    The problem affects practically every brand — from Volkswagen and Škoda, through Toyota and Kia, to BMW and Tesla. If scratched plastic in your car is your problem, this guide will show you 5 ways to protect and restore piano black elements.

    What is piano black and why does it scratch?

    Piano black (also known as “black piano”) is a high-gloss lacquered plastic ABS or PMMA used on decorative elements inside the car. It gets its name from the finish resembling the surface of a piano — deep black with a mirror-like reflection.

    You will most often find it on:

    • Center panel (central console, center tunnel)
    • Door trims and window frames from the inside
    • Gear shift lever housing and the frame of the automatic transmission
    • Multimedia screen frame
    • Air conditioning panels and buttons
    • Dashboard elements

    The problem with piano black arises from the very nature of the material. The glossy surface reveals every scratch, even microscopic ones. Hard dust particles act like sandpaper — just wiping the element with a dry cloth leaves a network of fine scratches on the surface. Fingernails, rings, and even the sleeve of a jacket can leave visible marks.

    Worse still, the darker the surroundings in the cabin, the more clearly the scratches reflecting light are visible. After a few months of use, a new, elegant panel looks heavily worn.

    How to clean piano black without scratching?

    Improper cleaning causes most scratches on piano black. What to clean piano black with to avoid scratching it? Here is a proven method.

    What not to do:

    • Do not wipe piano black with a dry cloth — you are dragging dust particles across the surface
    • Do not use paper towels or tissues — they have too coarse a texture
    • Do not use alcohol-based, acetone, or solvent-based cleaners
    • Do not rub in circles — this deepens existing scratches

    Proper cleaning step by step:

    1. Blow off loose dust with compressed air or a soft detailing brush
    2. Dampen a clean microfiber cloth (with a minimum weight of 300 GSM) with a pH-neutral cleaner or a dedicated product for piano black
    3. Wipe the surface gently, in one direction — never in circular motions
    4. Dry with a second, dry microfiber cloth, again in one direction

    Tip: Keep a separate microfiber cloth in the glove compartment designated solely for piano black elements. A dirty cloth previously used to clean the dashboard contains particles that will scratch the glossy surface.

    Polishing piano black — a rescue for scratched elements

    Removing scratches from piano black is possible through polishing. If the elements in your car’s interior are already covered with a network of fine scratches — piano black scratches of this type can be effectively restored. However, this method has its limitations.

    Hand polishing:

    • Use a specialized polishing paste for piano black (fine-grained)
    • Apply a small amount to a soft polishing sponge or microfiber pad
    • Polish with gentle movements in one direction
    • Wipe off excess paste with a clean microfiber cloth
    • Repeat until the desired effect is achieved

    Machine polishing:

    Deeper scratches require a rotary or oscillating polisher with a soft pad. This solution is for individuals with detailing experience — an inexperienced hand can overheat the plastic or polish unevenly.

    Polishing limitations:

    AspectPolishingProtective film
    Removes existing scratches❌ (optically covers)
    Protects against new scratches
    Durability of the effect2–4 weeks3–5 years
    One-time cost50–150 zł (paste + pad)112–430 zł (PianoSkin set)
    Requires repetitionYes, regularlyNo

    Polishing is a temporary solution. The surface after polishing is perfectly smooth but lacks any protection — scratches reappear within a few weeks. Therefore, it is worth combining polishing with wrapping in film.

    Piano black film — the most effective protection method

    Wrapping piano black with PPF (Paint Protection Film) is the only method that permanently protects the surface from scratches. The film creates an invisible barrier between your fingers and the sensitive plastic.

    How does the film on piano black work?

    PPF is a multi-layer material consisting of:

    • Top layer — a self-healing topcoat that seals minor scratches under heat
    • Carrier layer — flexible polyurethane (TPU) with a thickness of 150–200 microns
    • Adhesive layer — acrylic glue that leaves no marks after removing the film

    A good piano black film maintains full transparency and the original finish appearance — the same deep gloss, but with protection. According to TPU material specifications used in PPF films, polyurethane has the ability to self-heal minor scratches when exposed to heat.

    GrizzGlass PianoSkin — kits tailored to your car

    Unlike PPF films sold by the meter (which require professional cutting and installation), GrizzGlass PianoSkin kits are precisely cut pieces tailored to a specific car model. Each film piece corresponds exactly to the shape and dimensions of the piano black decor in the given car.

    What does the PianoSkin set include:

    • Precisely cut film elements (from 2 to 8 pieces, depending on the model)
    • Microfiber cloth
    • Cleaning solution for surface preparation
    • Installation gel
    • Application squeegee
    • Installation instructions

    Two finish options:

    OptionEffectFor whom
    PianoSkin GlossyMaintains the original piano black glossIf you want invisible protection
    PianoSkin MatteChanges the finish to matte, satinIf you want to change the interior style and reduce fingerprints

    The matte option has an additional advantage — on the matte surface, fingerprints and minor scratches are virtually invisible.

    How much does it cost to wrap piano black with film?

    Cost comparison for piano black protection:

    MethodCostWhat it includesDurability
    Professional wrapping in a detailing studio500–1,500 PLNFilm by the meter + labor3–7 years
    GrizzGlass PianoSkin (DIY)112–430 PLNReady-to-install DIY kit3–5 years
    Regular polishing50–150 PLN / monthPaste + pad + time2–4 weeks
    Wax paste / coating80–200 PLNTemporary protective layer1–3 months

    The PianoSkin kit is a 2–3 times cheaper alternative to wrapping in a detailing studio — and the effect is comparable, as the film is factory-cut to the dimensions of the elements.

    Our choice: GrizzGlass PianoSkin kit — 2–3 times cheaper than a detailing studio, with a comparable effect and self-installation in 30–60 minutes.

    For which cars are PianoSkin films available?

    GrizzGlass PianoSkin covers over 20 car brands and hundreds of specific models. Here are the most popular:

    BrandExample modelsCategory link
    VolkswagenGolf 8, Passat B9, Tiguan, ID.4, T-RocVW Films
    ToyotaCorolla, Corolla Cross, RAV4, Yaris Cross, C-HRToyota Films
    BMWSeries 3 G20, Series 5 G60/F10, X3, X5, iXBMW Films
    KiaSportage 5, EV6, Ceed, Stonic, NiroKia Films
    HyundaiTucson, Kona, i30, Ioniq 5, Santa FeHyundai Films
    TeslaModel 3, Model 3 Highland, Model Y, Model STesla Films
    ŠkodaOctavia 4, Kodiaq 2, Superb, Enyaq, ElroqŠkoda Films
    MercedesClass C W206, GLC, GLA, EQA, Class E W214Mercedes Films
    AudiA3, A4, Q5, Q7, e-tronAudi Films
    FordKuga, Focus, Puma, Explorer, CustomFord Films
    Peugeot3008, 308, 208, 508, 5008Peugeot Films
    VolvoXC60, XC90, XC40, EX30, V60Volvo Films
    RenaultAustral, Captur, Arkana, Clio, RafaleRenault Films
    Seat / CupraLeon, Formentor, Born, Ateca, TerramarSeat Films
    Alfa RomeoGiulia, Stelvio, Tonale, JuniorAlfa Romeo Films
    Fiat500, 600, Grande Panda, TipoFiat Films
    CitroënC4, C5 Aircross, C3, BerlingoCitroën Films
    LexusNX, RX, UX, ES, LBXLexus Films

    If your model is not on the list, check the category films for other cars — you will find there, among others, Chinese brands (Chery, Jetour, Geely), as well as Opel, Mazda, Nissan, Honda, Porsche, Land Rover, and many others.

    How to apply PianoSkin film yourself? Installation step by step

    One of the biggest advantages of PianoSkin kits is the possibility of self-installation. You don’t need detailing experience — just patience and the included tools.

    Preparation

    1. Wash your hands and make sure you don’t have rings or sharp nails on your fingers
    2. Clean the piano black elements with the included cleaning fluid — remove dust, grease, and fingerprints
    3. Wipe dry with the included microfiber cloth
    4. Make sure the cabin temperature is between 18–25°C (too cold a surface makes adhesion difficult)

    Application

    1. Remove the film from the protective backing
    2. Apply the mounting gel to the piano black surface — this allows you to slide the film and adjust its position
    3. Apply the film to the element, align the edges
    4. Use a squeegee to smooth the film from the center to the edges — removing air bubbles and excess gel
    5. Wipe off the excess gel with a microfiber cloth

    After installation

    • Do not touch the wrapped elements for 12–24 hours (curing time of the adhesive)
    • Do not clean or polish the film for 48 hours
    • After curing, the film is ready for normal use

    Tip: If a small air bubble remains under the film, do not panic. Small bubbles often disappear on their own within 24–48 hours as the mounting gel dries.

    Not just piano black — complete protection for your car

    Piano black is not the only part of the car susceptible to scratches. GrizzGlass also offers protective films for other sensitive elements of the body and interior:

    GrizzGlass BodyShield — body protection

    BodyShield films protect external elements vulnerable to scratches and chips:

    • Door sills — scratched when getting in and out (shoes, belt buckles)
    • Handles — scratches from nails and rings
    • Rear bumper — marks from loading the trunk
    • B/C pillars — scratches from passengers and luggage
    • Trunk edge — contact with suitcases and bags

    BodyShield kits for thresholds cost from 45 PLN — this is a fraction of the cost of repainting a scratched threshold (300–800 PLN at a paint shop).

    GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection — multimedia screen protection

    Screens in modern cars range from 8 to even 24 inches diagonally. They are made of glass or plastic and are prone to scratches from fingers and dust. CarDisplay Protection films are available in two variants:

    • Ceramic — maintains full transparency, increases scratch resistance
    • Matte — reduces glare, improves screen readability in sunlight

    Films for multimedia screens cost from 110 to 220 PLN — depending on the display size and finish variant.

    When to wrap piano black? The sooner, the better

    The best time to protect piano black is on the day you pick up your new car. The elements are then in perfect condition, without any scratches. The film will preserve the factory gloss for years.

    Tip: Order PianoSkin even before picking up your new car. The film applied on the first day will preserve the factory gloss for years — before anything gets scratched.

    If your car is already a few months or years old, it’s still worth wrapping the piano black — but first polish the scratches. The order is important:

    1. Polish the scratched elements with polishing paste
    2. Clean the surface thoroughly with the included preparation
    3. Wrap with PianoSkin film

    This way, you maintain a smooth, renewed surface under the film, which protects it from being scratched again.

    Summary

    Piano black is one of the most frustrating finishes in car interiors — visually stunning, but horrifically impractical without protection. Regular polishing lasts for a few weeks, while PianoSkin film protects elements for years.

    GrizzGlass PianoSkin kits are tailored to specific car models, include everything needed for self-installation, and cost from 112 PLN. This is several times less than wrapping at a detailing studio.

    Check protective films for your car at homescreen.pl — you will find PianoSkin, BodyShield, and CarDisplay Protection kits for over 20 brands and hundreds of car models →

    FAQ — frequently asked questions

    What is piano black in a car?

    Piano black is a glossy, black decorative finish used on plastic elements in a car’s interior — panels, trims, button housings, and screen frames. The name comes from the finish resembling a piano’s lacquer. The material is particularly prone to scratches and collecting fingerprints.

    Can scratches be removed from piano black?

    Yes — minor scratches can be removed manually or mechanically using a specialized fine-grain polishing paste. However, the polishing effect is temporary and lasts 2–4 weeks. To permanently protect the surface, it is advisable to apply PianoSkin protective film after polishing.

    How much does it cost to wrap piano black in film?

    Professional wrapping of piano black at a detailing studio costs 500–1,500 PLN. An alternative is the GrizzGlass PianoSkin DIY kit — from 112 to 430 PLN, depending on the car model and the number of elements in the kit.

    Can the PianoSkin film be applied by oneself?

    Yes. The PianoSkin kits include precisely cut film elements and a complete set of tools (microfiber, cleaning solution, installation gel, squeegee). Installation takes 30–60 minutes and does not require detailing experience. After application, the film needs 12–24 hours to cure.

    What to clean piano black in the car with?

    For cleaning piano black, use only a soft microfiber cloth (min. 300 GSM) soaked in a pH-neutral cleaner. First, blow off dust with compressed air, then wipe the surface in one direction. Never wipe piano black dry or in circular motions.

    Does the film on piano black change the interior appearance?

    The Glossy variant is optically transparent and retains the original shine of piano black. The Matte variant changes the finish to satin — which has the additional advantage that fingerprints and small scratches are practically invisible on the matte surface.

  • Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro — aluminum instead of glass. Is it worth switching?

    Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro — aluminum instead of glass. Is it worth switching?

    Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro — Phone 4a Pro wins with a 144 Hz display with a brightness of 5000 nits, a Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 processor (even twice as powerful GPU), and a completely new Glyph Matrix with 137 mini-LEDs. However, it loses the iconic transparent back for an aluminum casing and has a weaker selfie camera (32 MP instead of 50 MP). In Poland, the surcharge is about 350 PLN compared to the launch price of the 3a Pro.

    Nothing Phone 4a Pro debuted on March 5, 2026 — exactly one year after the Phone 3a Pro, which premiered during MWC 2025. The first reviews from critics are positive, but the comparison of both generations reveals not only progress — but also a surprising step backward.

    Looking for a case or tempered glass? In our store, you will find accessories for Nothing Phone 4a Pro and Nothing Phone 3a Pro.

    Nothing Phone 4a Pro — marketing photo, overall view

    Key differences — Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro at a glance

    FeaturePhone 4a Pro (2026)Phone 3a Pro (2025)
    ProcessorSnapdragon 7 Gen 4Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
    Display6.83″ / 144 Hz / 5000 nits6.77″ / 120 Hz / 3000 nits
    Telephoto50 MP, 3.5x optical zoom50 MP, 3x optical zoom
    Selfie Camera32 MP50 MP
    Battery5080 mAh5000 mAh
    Glyph137 mini-LEDs (matrix)3 LED strips, 26 zones
    BodyAluminum (unibody)Glass (transparent) + plastic
    ProtectionGorilla Glass 7i, IP65Panda Glass, IP64
    Price (PL)from 2099 PLN (8/128 GB)from ~1300 PLN (sales)

    Full specification — Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro

    ParameterPhone 4a ProPhone 3a Pro
    ReleaseMarch 2026March 2025
    Dimensions163.7 × 76.6 × 8.0 mm163.5 × 77.5 × 8.4 mm
    Weight210 g211 g
    Display6.83″ AMOLED, 1260 × 2800 px (440 ppi)6.77″ AMOLED, 1080 × 2392 px (387 ppi)
    Refresh Rate144 Hz120 Hz
    PWM2160 Hz2160 Hz
    Peak Brightness5000 nits3000 nits
    ProcessorSnapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm)Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm)
    GPUAdreno 722Adreno 810
    RAM8 / 12 GB LPDDR5X8 / 12 GB
    Storage128 / 256 GB (UFS 3.1)128 / 256 GB
    Main Camera50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56″50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56″
    Telephoto50 MP, f/2.9, 3.5× zoom, OIS50 MP, f/2.6, 3× zoom, OIS
    Ultrawide8 MP, f/2.2, 120°8 MP, f/2.2, 120°
    Selfie Camera32 MP, f/2.250 MP, f/2.2
    Video4K 30 fps, Ultra XDR / Dolby Vision4K 30 fps
    Battery5080 mAh5000 mAh
    Charging50 W (100% in 64 min)50 W (100% in 56 min)
    Wireless ChargingNoNo
    SystemAndroid 16 / Nothing OS 4.1Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 (update to Android 16)
    Updates3 years Android + 6 years security3 years Android + 6 years security
    5GYesYes
    WiFiWiFi 6WiFi 6
    Bluetooth5.45.4
    NFCYesYes
    IPIP65IP64
    ColorsBlack, Silver, PinkBlack, Gray

    You can check the official specifications from the manufacturer at nothing.tech.

    Display — 5000 vs 3000 nits and higher refresh rate

    The screen is one of the most noticeable changes when comparing Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro.

    The Phone 4a Pro received a larger 6.83-inch panel (vs 6.77″) with a higher resolution — 1260 × 2800 px gives 440 ppi instead of 387 ppi. Text and small interface elements look clearer. The refresh rate increased from 120 Hz to 144 Hz. You will notice the difference mainly in games and fast scrolling through lists.

    The biggest change concerns brightness. 5000 nits in the Phone 4a Pro is 67% more than 3000 nits in the 3a Pro. This has a real impact on screen readability in bright sunlight — while running, cycling, or navigating the city in summer.

    Nothing also applied Corning Gorilla Glass 7i instead of Panda Glass, which means better scratch resistance. You can find the full specifications of the Nothing Phone 4a Pro display in the table above. If you still prefer additional protection, tempered glass for Nothing smartphones is available in our store.

    💡 Tip: If you mainly use your phone indoors, the difference in brightness will be less noticeable. 3000 nits in the 3a Pro is still an excellent result — better than many flagship devices from 2024.

    Design and materials — the end of transparency

    This is the most controversial change. The Nothing Phone 4a Pro abandons the iconic transparent back for an aluminum unibody case. This is the first Nothing phone with a metal construction.

    What does this mean in practice?

    • Materials — 4a Pro: aluminum (frame and back) + Gorilla Glass 7i (front). 3a Pro: plastic frame + glass transparent back + Panda Glass (front).
    • Premium feeling — aluminum gives the impression of a more expensive phone. Reviewers compare it to higher-end devices.
    • Weight and dimensions — practically identical (210 vs 211 g). The Phone 4a Pro is thinner by 0.4 mm and narrower by almost a millimeter.
    • Water resistance — IP65 (resistance to water jets) vs IP64 (resistance to splashes). A small but real improvement.
    • Colors — 4a Pro offers three options (Black, Silver, Pink), 3a Pro two (Black, Gray).

    ⚠️ Note: If a transparent design is a key feature for you, Nothing — Phone 3a Pro is the last model in the “a” series that offers it. Phone 4a Pro looks more “mainstream,” which may not appeal to everyone.

    Nothing Phone 4a Pro — aluminum unibody construction

    Performance — Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs 7s Gen 3

    Under the hood, Phone 4a Pro hides the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the 3a Pro has the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. The difference is significant:

    • CPU — about 15% faster single-core, about 32% faster multi-core in Phone 4a Pro
    • GPU — Adreno 722 in 4a Pro is even twice as efficient as Adreno 810 in 3a Pro
    • RAM — both offer 8 and 12 GB LPDDR5X variants

    What does this mean in everyday use? The Phone 3a Pro is still a smooth phone — Nothing OS is well optimized. You will mainly feel the difference in:

    • Gaming — higher frames per second, more stable framerate in Genshin Impact, Call of Duty Mobile
    • Photo and video editing — export about 30% faster
    • Multitasking — more open apps without reloading

    Both phones have UFS 3.1 memory — the lack of UFS 4.0 is a certain compromise, but in practice, the difference is mainly felt when copying large files.

    Nothing Phone 4a Pro — Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 performance

    Camera — better zoom, but weaker selfies

    The main camera in both phones is identical — 50 MP, f/1.9, 1/1.56″ sensor with OIS. The ultrawide is also unchanged (8 MP, f/2.2). Key differences concern the telephoto lens and the selfie camera.

    Telephoto lens

    ParameterPhone 4a ProPhone 3a Pro
    Resolution50 MP50 MP
    Optical zoom3.5× (80 mm)3× (70 mm)
    Aperturef/2.9f/2.6
    SensorSamsung JN5, 1/2.75″1/1.95″
    Digital zoomup to 140×no data

    Phone 4a Pro offers a longer zoom (3.5× vs 3×), which is useful for photographing distant objects. It also features in-sensor zoom up to 7× and digital zoom up to 140×. But beware — the telephoto sensor is smaller (1/2.75″ vs 1/1.95″), which may result in poorer zoom photos in low light.

    There is also a new TrueLens Engine 4 — multi-frame RAW processing with 12-layer AI segmentation. Video has gained an Ultra XDR mode (similar to Dolby Vision HDR).

    Selfie camera — a step back

    This is the only clear downgrade in the Phone 4a Pro:

    • 3a Pro: 50 MP, 1/2.76″ sensor — one of the better selfie cameras in the segment
    • 4a Pro: 32 MP, 1/3.42″ sensor — smaller sensor, lower resolution, no 4K in video

    If you often take selfies, record TikToks, or have video calls, the 3a Pro has an objective advantage here.

    Nothing Phone 4a Pro — camera and telephoto module

    Battery and charging — Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro

    ParameterPhone 4a ProPhone 3a Pro
    Capacity5080 mAh5000 mAh
    Charging50 W50 W
    0–50%22 min19 min
    0–100%64 min56 min
    Endurance rating (GSMArena)63:24h43:17h
    Wireless chargingNoNo
    Reverse charging7.5 W (wired)No

    Phone 4a Pro has a slightly larger battery (5080 vs 5000 mAh), but achieves a significantly better endurance rating according to GSMArena — 63:24h vs 43:17h. This suggests that the new processor and display are more energy-efficient. Paradoxically, a full charge takes longer (64 vs 56 min) despite the identical power of 50 W.

    A new feature is reverse charging at 7.5 W — you can charge headphones or a smartwatch with a cable from Phone 4a Pro.

    💡 Tip: Neither model supports wireless charging. If this is important to you, consider alternatives like OnePlus 13 or Google Pixel.

    Glyph Interface — 137 LEDs vs 26 zones

    Glyph Interface is the hallmark of Nothing, and here the difference between generations is huge.

    Phone 3a Pro had 3 LED strips with 26 addressable zones arranged around the camera module. They were mainly used for notifications, charging indicators, and illuminating photos.

    Phone 4a Pro introduces a completely new Glyph Matrix — 137 individually controllable mini-LEDs with a brightness of up to 3000 nits. These are no longer strips — this is a pixel matrix that displays:

    • Pixel-style icons and animations
    • Digital clock
    • Battery level indicator
    • Moon phase and sun position
    • Notifications with individual patterns for contacts
    • Android 16 Live Updates on Glyph Bar (navigation, Uber rides, timers)
    • Illumination for photos

    The Glyph matrix occupies 57% more surface area than its predecessor and is 100% brighter. The new “Glyph Toys” features add interactive elements — something no other manufacturer offers.

    Software — Nothing OS 4.1 vs 3.1

    Phone 4a Pro launches with Android 16 and Nothing OS 4.1, while 3a Pro debuted with Android 15 and Nothing OS 3.1 (update to Android 16 / Nothing OS 4.0 available from December 2025).

    New features in Nothing OS 4.1:

    • Glyph Live Updates — integration of Android 16 Live Updates with the Glyph matrix
    • AI Eraser — local object removal from photos (no cloud)
    • AI Ringtone Generation — AI-generated ringtones for individual contacts
    • Relaxation Hub — “Breathing Break” widgets with Focus, Relax, and Calm modes
    • Lock Screen Depth Effect (beta) — clock hides behind wallpaper elements

    The update policy is identical — both phones will receive 3 major Android updates and 6 years of security patches. Phone 4a Pro will get Android up to version 19, while 3a Pro will get up to version 18.

    Price in Poland — Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro

    VariantPhone 4a ProPhone 3a Pro (launch)Phone 3a Pro (now)
    8/128 GB2099 PLNnonenone
    12/256 GB2399 PLN2049 PLNfrom ~1300 PLN

    Phone 4a Pro in the 12/256 GB version costs 2399 PLN — that’s about 350 PLN more than the launch price of the 3a Pro in the same configuration. But the real difference is greater: the 3a Pro can today be purchased in promotions for about 1300–1800 PLN. This means that for the price of the Phone 4a Pro, you can get the Phone 3a Pro and still have enough left for the Nothing 3a Pro case and accessories.

    Phone 4a Pro also offers a cheaper variant of 8/128 GB for 2099 PLN — an option not available with the 3a Pro.

    💡 Tip: If budget is a priority, the Phone 3a Pro at current prices (1300–1800 PLN) is one of the best smartphones in this range. By paying extra for the 4a Pro, you mainly gain a better display, performance, and Glyph Matrix.

    Which model for whom? Summary

    Choose the Nothing Phone 4a Pro if:

    • You care about having the best display in the segment (144 Hz, 5000 nits)
    • You play games and need a stronger GPU
    • You want the new Glyph Matrix with 137 LEDs
    • You prefer a metal, premium build
    • You are buying a new phone and comparing it with other new releases of 2026

    Stick with the Nothing Phone 3a Pro (or buy it now) if:

    • You love the transparent design of Nothing
    • You often take selfies (50 MP vs 32 MP)
    • You are looking for a great smartphone at a lower price (from ~1300 PLN)
    • The current performance of the 3a Pro is enough for you
    • You don’t need the latest Glyph features

    In summary, comparing Nothing Phone 4a Pro vs 3a Pro — the new model is better in almost every technical category, but not enough for 3a Pro users to rush to the store. The biggest arguments for the upgrade are the 5000 nit display, Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, and the revolutionary Glyph Matrix. The biggest argument against it is the loss of the transparent design and a weaker selfie camera.

    Check the full range of accessories for both models:
    Cases and glass for Nothing Phone 4a Pro
    Cases and glass for Nothing Phone 3a Pro
    All Nothing accessories

    Alternatives — what else is worth considering?

    If neither of the Nothing Phones meets your expectations one hundred percent, it’s worth looking at the competition in a similar price range:

    Google Pixel 9a — a direct competitor in the segment. It offers pure Android, seven years of updates, and one of the best cameras among mid-range devices thanks to Google’s algorithms. No Glyph Interface and less distinctive design, but it makes up for it with software. You can find accessories for Pixel in our Google Pixel category.

    OnePlus Nord 4 — if wireless charging is a priority, OnePlus has delivered what both Nothing Phones lack. A metal body (similar philosophy to 4a Pro), 120 Hz AMOLED, and OxygenOS based on pure Android. Check accessories for OnePlus.

    Samsung Galaxy A56 — a choice for those who value the Samsung ecosystem. One UI, Samsung Pay, DeX — this is not offered by Nothing OS. Inferior Glyph (because it doesn’t exist), but better service support in Poland and a wide network of stores.

    CMF Phone 2 Pro — a budget option from the Nothing sub-brand. Much cheaper, lacks periscope and Glyph, but shares the design philosophy and software with Nothing. Ideal if you like Nothing OS but don’t want to spend 2000+ PLN. Check out accessories for CMF Phone.

    Note: Each of the above alternatives has its strengths, but none offers the Glyph Interface — this remains a unique feature of the Nothing ecosystem, which distinguishes the Phone 4a Pro and 3a Pro from the competition.

    FAQ — frequently asked questions

    Is it worth switching from Nothing Phone 3a Pro to 4a Pro?

    If the 3a Pro is working well and you are not complaining about performance or the screen — you don’t need to rush. The upgrade makes sense mainly for those who want the brightest display in the segment (5000 nits), need a stronger GPU for gaming, or have fallen in love with the new Glyph Matrix. It is not worth replacing the phone after a year of use just for the price difference.

    Which has a better camera — 4a Pro or 3a Pro?

    It depends on the scenario. The main camera (50 MP, f/1.9) is identical in both. The Phone 4a Pro wins with the telephoto lens (3.5× vs 3× zoom) and image processing (TrueLens Engine 4, Ultra XDR video). But the 3a Pro has a clearly better selfie camera — 50 MP with a larger sensor vs 32 MP in the newer model.

    How much does the Nothing Phone 4a Pro cost in Poland?

    The Nothing Phone 4a Pro costs in Poland from 2099 PLN for the 8/128 GB version and 2399 PLN for the 12/256 GB version. In comparison, the Nothing Phone 3a Pro (12/256 GB) can now be purchased on promotion for about 1300–1800 PLN.

    Does the Nothing Phone 4a Pro have wireless charging?

    No — just like the 3a Pro. Neither model supports wireless charging. Both charge via cable with a power of 50 W. The Phone 4a Pro, however, offers reverse charging at 7.5 W, which its predecessor did not have.

    What is the difference between the Glyph Interface in the 4a Pro and the 3a Pro?

    The difference is huge. The Phone 3a Pro had 3 LED strips with 26 zones. The Phone 4a Pro has a completely new Glyph Matrix — 137 mini-LEDs displaying icons, animations, a clock, battery level, moon phase, and supporting Android 16 Live Updates.

    How long will Nothing update both phones?

    Both models will receive 3 major Android system updates and 6 years of security patches. Phone 4a Pro (launch: Android 16) will be updated to Android 19. Phone 3a Pro (launch: Android 15, currently Android 16) — to Android 18.

  • OPPO Watch X2 vs OPPO Watch X3 — comparison

    OPPO Watch X2 vs OPPO Watch X3 — comparison

    OPPO Watch X2 vs X3 — what are the differences and is the newer model worth the extra cost? OPPO Watch X3 is a flagship smartwatch with a titanium case, a 3000-nit display, and a blood glucose sensor.

    Compared to the Watch X2, it is lighter by 6 g, thinner by 0.75 mm, and offers a brighter screen and new health features. Below is a detailed comparison of both models.

    OPPO unveiled the Watch X3 on March 17, 2026, in China. It is the direct successor to the Watch X2, which debuted in May 2025. Both smartwatches have a 1.5-inch LTPO OLED screen (dynamic refresh rate technology), a Snapdragon W5 processor, and eSIM (built-in SIM card with LTE support), but the newer model introduces several significant changes in design and sensor set.

    Interestingly, OPPO is also preparing a Watch X3 Mini variant — a smaller version, which is set to launch in April 2026. If the standard 47 mm size is too large for you, it’s worth waiting for this compact alternative.

    Looking for protective accessories for your smartwatch? Check out films and glasses for OPPO Watch in our store.

    Key differences — OPPO Watch X2 vs X3 at a glance

    DifferenceWatch X2Watch X3
    CaseStainless steel + titaniumTC4 titanium (aerospace)
    Screen brightness2200 nits3000 nits
    Weight (without strap)49.7 g43 g
    Glucose sensorNoYes
    Water resistanceIP68, 5 ATMIP68, IP69, 5 ATM
    SystemWear OS 5.0ColorOS Watch 16.0
    ProcessorSnapdragon W5 Gen 1Snapdragon W5 Gen 2

    Full specification OPPO Watch X3 vs Watch X2

    ParameterOPPO Watch X3OPPO Watch X2
    PremiereMarch 2026May 2025
    Display1.5″ LTPO OLED1.5″ LTPO AMOLED
    Resolution466 × 466 px466 × 466 px
    Max brightness3000 nits2200 nits
    ProcessorSnapdragon W5 Gen 2Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
    Co-processorQualcomm QCC5100BES2800BP
    RAM2 GB2 GB
    Internal memory32 GB32 GB
    Battery646 mAh648 mAh
    Battery life (smart mode)up to 5 daysup to 5 days
    Battery life (power saving)up to 16 daysup to 16 days
    Dimensions47.4 × 47.4 × 11.0 mm47.6 × 46.6 × 11.75 mm
    Weight70 g (with strap) / 43 g (watch only)76 g (with strap) / 49.7 g (watch only)
    Case materialaircraft-grade titanium TC4stainless steel + titanium (bezel)
    Glasssapphiresapphire
    Water resistanceIP68, IP69, 5 ATMIP68, 5 ATM
    Military standardMIL-STD-810HMIL-STD-810H
    GPSL1 + L5 (GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS)L1 + L5 (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS)
    Bluetooth5.25.2
    WiFi802.11 a/b/g/n802.11 a/b/g/n
    LTE / eSIMyesyes
    NFCyesyes
    Heart rate sensoryesyes
    SpO2yesyes
    ECGyesyes
    Blood pressureyesyes
    Skin temperatureyesyes
    Glucose sensoryesno
    SystemColorOS Watch 16.0Wear OS 5.0 + ColorOS Watch 7.0
    Sports modes100+100+
    Price (China)from approx. 1400 PLNapprox. 1300–1500 PLN

    Display — 3000 vs 2200 nits

    The watches have the same display size of 1.5 inches and identical resolution of 466 × 466 pixels. In everyday use, the screens look very similar — colors are vibrant, blacks are deep, and viewing angles are wide.

    The key difference is brightness. The OPPO Watch X3 reaches 3000 nits, which is 36% more than the 2200 nits in the older model. In comparison, the display of the OPPO Watch X2 vs X3 is one of the more noticeable aspects — especially under bright sunlight while running, cycling, or walking around the city in summer.

    The Watch X3 uses a next-generation LTPO OLED panel, while the Watch X2 uses LTPO AMOLED. Both support Always-On Display (AOD — continuous display of time and selected information on the screen), but the newer model should be slightly more energy-efficient due to the updated display technology.

    Tip: If you primarily train indoors or in the evenings, the difference in screen brightness won’t be crucial for you. 2200 nits in the Watch X2 is still a very good result — more than in most competing smartwatches.

    Design and materials — titanium vs steel

    This is one of the biggest changes between generations. The OPPO Watch X3 has a case made entirely of aerospace-grade TC4 titanium, while the Watch X2 combines stainless steel with a titanium frame.

    What does this mean in practice?

    • Weight — The Watch X3 weighs 43 g without the strap (vs 49.7 g). The difference of 6.7 g is about 13% less. You will definitely feel this on your wrist, especially during sleep and training.
    • Thickness — The newer model is 11.0 mm thick (vs 11.75 mm). The watch hides better under a shirt cuff and protrudes less on a slim wrist.
    • Durability — Both have sapphire glass and MIL-STD-810H certification (military-grade durability standard). However, the Watch X3 adds IP69 (resistance to high-pressure hot water jets), which its predecessor lacks.

    Both models have two buttons on the right side — the upper one serves as a rotating crown. The Watch X3 offers three color variants: Gravity Black, Global Star Orange, and Infinite Titanium.

    Regardless of which model you choose, it’s worth investing in additional screen protection. At homescreen.pl you will find GrizzGlass HybridGlass hybrid glass and GrizzGlass CeramicFilm ceramic film for OPPO Watch X2 starting from 12.99 PLN.

    Performance — Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 vs Gen 1

    OPPO Watch X3 runs on the newer Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 with an ARM Cortex-A53 processor up to 1.7 GHz and Adreno 702 GPU. It is supported by the Qualcomm QCC5100 coprocessor. Watch X2 uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 with the BES2800BP coprocessor.

    In everyday use, the difference in smoothness is not dramatic — both smartwatches handle navigation through the menu, notifications, and apps efficiently. However, the newer chipset in Watch X3 should provide:

    • Better energy efficiency — the same battery life with increased screen brightness and new sensors.
    • Faster processing of health data — crucial for continuous monitoring of glucose, blood pressure, and ECG.
    • Smoother animations — particularly noticeable when switching between watch faces and apps.

    Both generations have 2 GB of RAM and 32 GB of internal storage, so in this respect, nothing changes. 32 GB is enough for offline maps, music, and several dozen apps.

    Battery and charging — OPPO Watch X3 vs X2

    The battery capacities are nearly identical — 646 mAh in the Watch X3 vs 648 mAh in the Watch X2. The declared usage times (according to the manufacturer) also match:

    • Smart mode — up to 5 days
    • Intensive usage — about 3 days
    • Power saving mode — up to 16 days

    So where is the difference? The Watch X3 achieves the same battery life despite a brighter screen and additional sensors, indicating better energy optimization of the new chipset and display.

    The OPPO Watch X3 charges fully in about 75 minutes, while the Watch X2 takes about 60 minutes with the 10W VOOC charger. The newer model compensates for the longer charging time with a quick “emergency” charging feature — 10 minutes provides power for 24 hours. Useful when you discover a dead watch in the morning before your workout.

    Note: Both models only charge with dedicated magnetic chargers — they do not support the Qi standard. Before purchasing, make sure you have the original charging accessory.

    Health and Sensors — the Biggest Advantage of the Watch X3

    This is an area where the OPPO Watch X3 clearly outpaces its predecessor. Both models offer:

    • 24/7 heart rate monitoring
    • Blood oxygen saturation measurement (SpO2)
    • ECG (electrocardiogram)
    • Blood pressure measurement
    • Skin temperature measurement
    • Sleep analysis with phases (light, deep, REM)

    Watch X3 adds a blood glucose sensor — a feature that the Watch X2 lacks. The watch uses non-invasive optical technology for continuous monitoring of sugar levels. This is particularly useful for people with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes, but also for athletes tracking the impact of diet on training results.

    It is worth noting that non-invasive glucose measurement from the wrist does not replace a professional glucometer. This technology is still developing and is more suited for observing trends rather than for precise medical measurements. Nevertheless, continuous glucose monitoring is a feature that most competitors in this price range do not offer — including Samsung Galaxy Watch and Huawei Watch GT.

    In the showdown between OPPO Watch X2 vs X3, it is the sensors that make the biggest difference. The rest of the health features are identical.

    Sports and Navigation

    Both smartwatches support over 100 sports modes and GPS with dual-band L1 + L5 signal, ensuring precise route tracking in urban areas with tall buildings.

    Watch X3 uses five satellite navigation systems (GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS), while Watch X2 uses four (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS — without BeiDou). In practice, the additional system can improve positioning accuracy in difficult conditions — e.g., in dense forests or narrow streets of old towns.

    Both models have eSIM with LTE support, allowing you to receive calls and messages without a phone. Useful when running or cycling, when you don’t want to take your smartphone with you.

    In the context of sports, it’s worth mentioning the analysis of gait and posture while running — a feature available in both models. The watch monitors cadence, ground contact time, and vertical oscillations, providing runners with specific data to improve their technique.

    If you are comparing smartwatches with other brands, also check our offer of watch bands and accessories.

    Operating System — Wear OS vs ColorOS Watch

    Here lies an interesting change and one of the key elements in the comparison of OPPO Watch X2 vs X3. Watch X2 runs on Wear OS 5.0 with the ColorOS Watch 7.0 overlay, which means access to apps from the Google Play Store — Google Maps, Spotify, Strava, and many others.

    OPPO Watch X3 has transitioned to ColorOS Watch 16.0 as a standalone system. In China, Wear OS is not widely used, so OPPO opted for its own solution with better energy optimization. The question is: what system will the global version of Watch X3 receive?

    If OPPO decides on Wear OS for the international version (as was done with Watch X2), the difference will be smaller. However, if the global version retains ColorOS Watch 16.0, access to applications will be limited to the OPPO ecosystem and selected partners.

    Tip: If you care about the Google app ecosystem (maps, Spotify, Google Wallet), Watch X2 with Wear OS 5.0 is a safer choice — at least until we learn the details of the global launch of Watch X3.

    Price and Availability — OPPO Watch X2 vs X3 in Poland

    OPPO Watch X3 debuted in China at the following prices:

    • Gravity Black — 2599 yuan (approx. 1400 PLN)
    • Global Star Orange / Infinite Titanium — 2799 yuan (approx. 1510 PLN)

    OPPO Watch X2 at launch cost around 1300–1500 PLN depending on the variant. It can currently be found at lower prices, making it an attractive option for those looking for a flagship OPPO smartwatch at a more affordable price.

    The global premiere of the Watch X3 has not yet been officially confirmed, but the OPPO Watch X2 hit the international market (including Poland) a few months after its Chinese premiere. A similar scenario can be expected — it’s worth following the official OPPO website for updates.

    OPPO Watch X3 Mini — a smaller version is coming

    OPPO is also preparing a compact variant, the Watch X3 Mini, which is expected to be released in April 2026. Information about this model has appeared in several leaks, but the official specifications have not yet been revealed.

    If the standard 47-millimeter size of the Watch X3 is too large for you — for example, you have a slim wrist or prefer smaller watches — it’s worth waiting for this model. The Watch X2 Mini turned out to be a popular alternative, and the Watch X3 Mini will likely follow the same path.

    Current accessories for the smaller model are available — check out the GrizzGlass hybrid glass for OPPO Watch X2 Mini in our store.

    Who is the OPPO Watch X3 for, and who is the Watch X2 for?

    Choose the OPPO Watch X3 if:

    • You care about the lightest and thinnest design (43 g vs 49.7 g)
    • You need blood glucose monitoring
    • You train outdoors and need a screen readable in full sunlight (3000 nits)
    • You want the latest generation with an IP69 certification

    Stick with the OPPO Watch X2 if:

    • You are looking for a proven smartwatch with Wear OS 5.0 and access to Google Play
    • You do not need a glucose sensor
    • You want to save money — the Watch X2 at falling prices offers great value for money
    • You prefer to wait for the global version of the Watch X3 and see what operating system it will get

    Summary

    In summary, comparing OPPO Watch X2 vs X3 — Watch X3 is a solid evolution, not a revolution. Key upgrades include a titanium case (lighter and thinner), a brighter 3000-nit display, and a blood glucose sensor. The rest of the specifications — battery, RAM, memory, connectivity — remain at the same level.

    If you have the Watch X2 and it works without issues, upgrading is not necessary. But if you are buying your first flagship OPPO smartwatch or are interested in glucose monitoring, the Watch X3 is definitely the better choice.

    Regardless of your choice, make sure to protect your smartwatch. At homescreen.pl, you will find protective films, hybrid glasses, and cases for OPPO smartwatches — starting from 11.99 PLN with fast delivery.

    FAQ

    Is OPPO Watch X3 compatible with iPhone?

    OPPO Watch X3 works best with Android smartphones. Compatibility with iPhone is limited — there is no full synchronization of notifications and health features. If you have an iPhone, it’s worth considering the Apple Watch, which is optimized for the Apple ecosystem.

    When will OPPO Watch X3 be available in Poland?

    The official date of the Polish premiere has not yet been confirmed. The OPPO Watch X2 reached European markets a few months after its Chinese debut — a similar schedule can be expected for the Watch X3.

    Is the OPPO Watch X3 Mini available yet?

    No — the OPPO Watch X3 Mini has not yet been officially presented. The premiere is expected in April 2026. Only preliminary information from leaks is known.

    Is it worth buying the OPPO Watch X2 now, or should I wait for the X3?

    If you care about Wear OS and access to Google Play — the Watch X2 is a safe choice. If you want the latest health sensors and a titanium case, wait for the global premiere of the Watch X3. The price of the Watch X2 is becoming increasingly attractive.

    What is the weight difference between the Watch X3 and Watch X2?

    The OPPO Watch X3 weighs 43 g (the watch itself without the strap), while the Watch X2 weighs 49.7 g. The difference of 6.7 g is due to the use of titanium instead of stainless steel.

    Does the OPPO Watch X3 measure blood pressure?

    Yes — both the Watch X3 and Watch X2 have a blood pressure sensor. However, the Watch X3 adds blood glucose measurement, which the older model does not offer.

  • POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

    POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

    The dilemma of POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max is one of the hottest smartphone comparisons of 2026. Both models debuted in March and immediately generated enormous interest — they offer AMOLED displays with a brightness of 3,500 nits, IP68/IP69K protection, and 100 W charging. The key difference? Processor, battery, and camera. POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, while POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN. Below you will find a detailed comparison to help you choose the right model.

    Technical specifications — POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max

    Before we move on to a detailed analysis, it’s worth seeing the full specifications of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in one place. The table below shows the key differences between both models.

    ParameterPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    Display6.59″ AMOLED, 1.5K6.83″ AMOLED, 1.5K
    Brightness3,500 nits (peak)3,500 nits (peak)
    Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
    ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra (4 nm)MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (3 nm)
    AnTuTu v112,283,5583,085,998
    RAM / Storage8/256 GB or 12/512 GB12/256 GB or 12/512 GB
    Main Camera50 MP, Sony IMX882, OIS50 MP, Light Fusion 600, OIS
    Battery6,500 mAh8,500 mAh
    Charging100 W HyperCharge100 W HyperCharge
    SystemAndroid 16, HyperOS 3Android 16, HyperOS 3
    ResistanceIP68 / IP69KIP68 / IP69K
    Weight201.5 g218 g
    Fingerprint ReaderOptical (under display)Ultrasonic (under display)
    Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
    eSIMNoYes
    Price from1,399 PLN1,799 PLN

    Display — bigger doesn’t always mean better

    Both the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max feature 1.5K AMOLED panels with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and a peak brightness of 3,500 nits. They support Dolby Vision and HDR10+, which translates to excellent color reproduction while watching movies.

    The main difference is the size — the POCO X8 Pro has a 6.59-inch display, while the POCO X8 Pro Max offers 6.83 inches. Both models are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i and have TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

    Tip: If you value compactness and one-handed operation, the POCO X8 Pro will be more comfortable. For fans of large displays — the X8 Pro Max with a 6.83-inch panel is a better choice for movies and games.

    The touch sampling rate is 480 Hz (Game Turbo) in both models, and the PWM dimming operates at 3,840 Hz — this is important for those sensitive to screen flicker.

    POCO X8 Pro — AMOLED display 6.59 inches with brightness of 3500 nits

    Processor and performance — this is where the POCO X8 Pro Max excels

    This is one of the biggest differences when comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra in a 4-nanometer process technology, while the Pro Max received the flagship Dimensity 9500s made in a 3 nm process.

    The performance difference is clear — the POCO X8 Pro score in AnTuTu v11 is 2,283,558 points, while the POCO X8 Pro Max achieves 3,085,998 in AnTuTu:

    TestPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro MaxDifference
    AnTuTu v112,283,5583,085,998+35%
    Process technology4 nm (TSMC)3 nmNewer
    GPUMali-G720 MC8Immortalis-G925 MC12Higher class

    The Dimensity 9500s in the POCO X8 Pro Max is a flagship segment chip — the same processor can be found in phones costing over 3,000 PLN. The Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU provides smooth gameplay even in the most demanding mobile games, such as Genshin Impact or Honkai: Star Rail at the highest settings.

    POCO X8 Pro with Dimensity 8500-Ultra also performs very well in everyday use — multitasking, social media, and gaming on medium settings are not a problem. However, in benchmarks and intensive games, the 35% difference in favor of the Max model is noticeable.

    Both smartphones feature the POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system with a surface area of 5,300 mm², which effectively dissipates heat during longer gaming sessions.

    It is worth adding that both models support 5G network (SA/NSA) — this is the standard in 2026, but still an important parameter when choosing a new smartphone. The RAM in both cases is LPDDR5X, and the internal storage is UFS 4.1 — the fastest available standards in the mid-premium segment.

    Camera — Light Fusion 600 vs Sony IMX882

    Both models have a 50 MP main camera with optical image stabilization (OIS), but the sensors used differ significantly.

    POCO X8 Pro uses the Sony IMX882 — a proven sensor with a size of 1/1.95 inches and 0.8 μm pixels. It is a solid sensor that performs well in daylight and well-lit scenes.

    POCO X8 Pro Max received the newer Light Fusion 600 with 1.6 μm pixels — twice as large as those in the X8 Pro. The Dual Native ISO Fusion technology improves dynamic range and significantly enhances photo quality in low light. In practice, this means less noise in night photos and better details in shadows.

    The remaining elements of the camera set are identical:
    – Ultra-wide angle — 8 MP, f/2.2
    – Front — 20 MP, f/2.2
    – Video recording — 4K at 30/60 fps, slow motion 960 fps

    Tip: If you often take photos in the evening or in poorly lit interiors, the POCO X8 Pro Max with the Light Fusion 600 sensor will be a noticeably better choice.

    Battery and charging — 6,500 vs 8,500 mAh

    This is another category where the POCO X8 Pro Max clearly dominates. The 8,500 mAh battery (silicon-carbon technology) is 30% more than the 6,500 mAh in the Pro model.

    ParameterPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    Capacity6,500 mAh8,500 mAh
    Wired charging100 W HyperCharge100 W HyperCharge
    Reverse charging27 W27 W
    Wireless chargingNoNo
    Battery life≥80% after 1,600 cycles≥80% after 1,600 cycles

    In practice, the POCO X8 Pro Max easily lasts two full days of moderate use, and with light usage, even three days. The POCO X8 Pro comfortably provides a full day even with intensive use.

    Both models charge with a power of 100 W — the POCO X8 Pro Max recovers 50% of energy in about 24 minutes, and a full charge takes just over 50 minutes. Neither model supports wireless charging.

    If you are looking for a fast wall charger that supports 100 W, it’s worth choosing a model with USB Power Delivery (fast charging standard) or a dedicated Xiaomi charger. A compact power bank with the appropriate output power will also be useful for daily top-ups while traveling.

    Build and design — aluminum, glass, and IP69K

    Both smartphones have aluminum frames, Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the front, and an IP68/IP69K certification — they can withstand immersion in water as well as a stream of hot water under pressure. This is rare in this price range. Despite their durability, it is worth protecting the display — screen protectors will provide additional protection against scratches in everyday use.

    ParameterPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    Dimensions157.5 × 75.2 × 8.4 mm162.9 × 77.9 × 8.2 mm
    Weight201.5 g218 g
    Back coverGlassFiberglass
    SIMDual nano-SIMDual nano-SIM + eSIM
    RGB backlight8 colors8 colors
    ColorsBlack, White, Mint GreenBlack, White, Blue

    POCO X8 Pro is lighter by 16.5 g and slightly narrower — it fits better in the hand and in narrower pockets. The Max model is slimmer (8.2 vs 8.4 mm) but larger and heavier due to the bigger battery and display.

    It is worth mentioning that the POCO X8 Pro is also available in a limited Iron Man edition (12/512 GB) for 1,749 PLN on promotion — this variant is for Marvel fans.

    Regardless of the chosen model, it is good to invest in a suitable POCO smartphone case that will protect the aluminum frame and glass or fiberglass back from mechanical damage.

    POCO X8 Pro — design and build with aluminum frame

    Connectivity — Wi-Fi 7 and eSIM only in the Max model

    In terms of connectivity, the POCO X8 Pro Max offers several significant improvements:

    • Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) instead of Wi-Fi 6 — faster transfer and lower latency
    • eSIM — a convenient solution while traveling, without the need to swap a physical SIM card
    • Bluetooth 5.4 with Auracast — wireless audio sharing to multiple headphones simultaneously
    • Symmetrical stereo speakers — better sound than the standard stereo speakers in the X8 Pro

    The POCO X8 Pro 5G and POCO X8 Pro Max 5G support both SA and NSA modes. Other common connectivity features include NFC, infrared port (IR blaster), USB-C 2.0, GPS L1+L5, and Dolby Atmos with Hi-Res Audio (24-bit/192 kHz). Neither model has a 3.5 mm headphone jack — if you prefer wireless audio, check out Bluetooth headphones compatible with both smartphones.

    Security and Software

    Both smartphones run on Android 16 with HyperOS 3 and will receive 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. They also have access to Google Gemini, Circle to Search, and AI tools (AI Writing, AI Speech).

    The key difference concerns the fingerprint reader:

    • POCO X8 Pro — optical reader under the screen
    • POCO X8 Pro Max — ultrasonic reader under the screen

    The ultrasonic reader works faster, is more precise, and recognizes the finger even when wet — this is a clear advantage of the Max model.

    POCO X8 Pro Max also offers the Xiaomi Offline Communication feature with a range of up to 500 m — it allows communication with other Xiaomi devices without internet access or cellular network.

    Price of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in Poland

    How much do these smartphones cost? The price of POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, and the price of POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN in the promotional launch (until March 31, 2026):

    VariantPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    8/256 GB1,399 PLN (only mi.com)
    12/256 GB1,799 PLN (only mi.com)
    12/512 GB1,599 PLN1,999 PLN
    Iron Man 12/512 GB1,749 PLN

    Regular prices (after the promotion):

    VariantPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    8/256 GB1,699 PLN
    12/256 GB2,099 PLN
    12/512 GB1,899 PLN2,299 PLN
    Iron Man 12/512 GB1,999 PLN

    The difference of 400 PLN between comparable variants (12/512 GB) is a reasonable surcharge for the flagship processor, larger battery, better camera, and Wi-Fi 7. You can find current prices and availability on the official POCO website.

    Gaming performance — how do they perform in practice?

    Simply comparing AnTuTu scores does not provide the full picture. In everyday use, both smartphones perform excellently — apps open instantly, multitasking works smoothly, and scrolling through the interface is fluid at 120 Hz.

    The difference becomes apparent in demanding mobile games. The POCO X8 Pro Max with the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU maintains a stable 60 fps in Genshin Impact at the highest graphics settings, while the POCO X8 Pro with the Mali-G720 MC8 requires lowering some options to medium to maintain smoothness. In less demanding titles — PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, or Honkai: Star Rail — both models run without issues at high settings.

    The POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system works effectively in both cases. After a 30-minute session of Genshin Impact, the casing temperatures remain within a comfortable range. The POCO X8 Pro Max has a slight advantage here due to its larger casing, which dissipates heat better.

    For casual gamers, the POCO X8 Pro will be more than sufficient. However, if you regularly play the most demanding titles and care about maximum graphics settings, the Dimensity 9500s in the Max model is a safer choice for the coming years.

    POCO X8 Pro Max vs competition — how does it compare to rivals?

    It’s worth looking at both POCO models in the context of the market. In the price range of 1,400–2,300 PLN, the competition is significant:

    • Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (~1,699 PLN) — better Samsung ecosystem, longer support (7 years of updates), but noticeably weaker Exynos 1580 processor and smaller 5,000 mAh battery. The POCO X8 Pro offers more performance for a similar price.
    • Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (~1,599 PLN) — a close relative from the Xiaomi family. Similar specifications to the POCO X8 Pro, but slightly weaker Dimensity 8400-Ultra and smaller 6,200 mAh battery. POCO stands out with an IP69K certification.
    • Nothing Phone (3a) (~1,799 PLN) — distinguished by its Glyph lighting design, pure Android, but weaker processor and smaller battery. A choice for those who prioritize aesthetics.
    • Motorola Edge 60 (~1,899 PLN) — a competitor with wireless charging, which is lacking in POCO. However, it falls short in performance compared to the POCO X8 Pro Max.

    POCO X8 Pro Max priced at 1,999 PLN (12/512 GB) offers performance comparable to smartphones costing over 3,000 PLN — Samsung Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, or Xiaomi 15. This is its biggest competitive advantage.

    Summary of differences — who wins in each category?

    CategoryWinnerWhy?
    DisplayPOCO X8 Pro MaxLarger 6.83″ panel
    PerformancePOCO X8 Pro MaxDimensity 9500s, +35% in AnTuTu
    CameraPOCO X8 Pro MaxLight Fusion 600, better night photos
    BatteryPOCO X8 Pro Max8,500 vs 6,500 mAh
    CompactnessPOCO X8 ProLighter (201.5 g), narrower
    PricePOCO X8 ProFrom 1,399 PLN
    ConnectivityPOCO X8 Pro MaxWi-Fi 7, eSIM, Auracast
    BiometricsPOCO X8 Pro MaxUltrasonic reader

    POCO X8 Pro Max wins in six out of eight categories — but POCO X8 Pro holds its ground with its price and compact dimensions.

    POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

    The choice between POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max depends on your priorities and budget.

    Choose POCO X8 Pro if:
    – You are looking for the best value for money under 1,700 PLN
    – You prefer a compact and lighter smartphone (201.5 g vs 218 g)
    – You don’t need flagship performance — Dimensity 8500-Ultra is more than sufficient for everyday tasks
    – You are interested in the limited Iron Man edition

    Choose POCO X8 Pro Max if:
    – You want the flagship Dimensity 9500s processor with performance comparable to phones costing over 3,000 PLN
    – You care about the longest battery life — 8,500 mAh lasts 2–3 days without charging
    – You take a lot of photos in low light — Light Fusion 600 makes a noticeable difference
    – You need eSIM or Wi-Fi 7
    – You value a faster and more accurate ultrasonic fingerprint reader

    Our verdict: For an additional 400 PLN, POCO X8 Pro Max offers significantly more — a flagship processor, a huge battery, and a better camera. It is one of the best smartphones in terms of price to performance ratio in 2026. However, if compactness and a lower price are priorities, POCO X8 Pro remains an excellent choice.

    In summary, comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — both smartphones offer excellent value, but the Max model targets users who want flagship performance without the flagship price.

    Are you looking for accessories for your new POCO smartphone? Check out cases and tempered glass for POCO phones at Home Screen — you’ll find protection tailored to your model.

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

    POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — what are the differences?

    The main differences are the processor (Dimensity 8500-Ultra vs flagship Dimensity 9500s), battery (6,500 vs 8,500 mAh), camera sensor (Sony IMX882 vs Light Fusion 600 with larger pixels), fingerprint reader (optical vs ultrasonic), and connectivity (Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7, no eSIM vs eSIM).

    Is the POCO X8 Pro Max worth the additional 400 PLN?

    Yes — for an additional 400 PLN, you get a flagship processor with 35% higher performance, a battery that’s 2,000 mAh larger, a better camera for night photos, Wi-Fi 7, and eSIM. It’s one of the better upgrades on the smartphone market.

    What is the price of the POCO X8 Pro in Poland?

    The POCO X8 Pro costs from 1,399 PLN (8/256 GB, promotional price) to 1,899 PLN (12/512 GB, regular price). There is also a limited Iron Man edition available for 1,749–1,999 PLN.

    Are the POCO X8 Pro and X8 Pro Max waterproof?

    Yes — both models have an IP68 and IP69K certification, which means they are resistant to immersion in water (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes) and to a stream of hot water under pressure.

    How long does the battery last in the POCO X8 Pro Max?

    The 8,500 mAh battery in the POCO X8 Pro Max lasts for 2–3 days of moderate use. The 100 W HyperCharge charging allows you to recover 50% of the energy in about 24 minutes.

    Does the POCO X8 Pro have eSIM?

    No — eSIM is available only in the POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model supports only two physical nano-SIM cards.

  • POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose?

    POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose?

    The dilemma of POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max is one of the hottest smartphone comparisons of 2026. Both models debuted in March and immediately sparked huge interest — they offer AMOLED displays with a brightness of 3,500 nits, IP68/IP69K protection, and 100 W charging. The key difference? Processor, battery, and camera. POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, while POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN. Below you will find a detailed comparison to help you choose the right model.

    Technical specifications — POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max

    Before we move on to a detailed analysis, it’s worth looking at the full specifications of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in one place. The table below shows the key differences between both models.

    ParameterPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    Display6.59″ AMOLED, 1.5K6.83″ AMOLED, 1.5K
    Brightness3,500 nits (peak)3,500 nits (peak)
    Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
    ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra (4 nm)MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (3 nm)
    AnTuTu v112,283,5583,085,998
    RAM / Storage8/256 GB or 12/512 GB12/256 GB or 12/512 GB
    Main Camera50 MP, Sony IMX882, OIS50 MP, Light Fusion 600, OIS
    Battery6,500 mAh8,500 mAh
    Charging100 W HyperCharge100 W HyperCharge
    Operating SystemAndroid 16, HyperOS 3Android 16, HyperOS 3
    ResistanceIP68 / IP69KIP68 / IP69K
    Weight201.5 g218 g
    Fingerprint ReaderOptical (under display)Ultrasonic (under display)
    Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
    eSIMNoYes
    Price from1,399 PLN1,799 PLN

    Display — bigger doesn’t always mean better

    Both the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max feature 1.5K AMOLED displays with a 120 Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 3,500 nits. They support Dolby Vision and HDR10+, resulting in excellent color reproduction while watching movies.

    The main difference is size — the POCO X8 Pro has a 6.59-inch display, while the POCO X8 Pro Max offers 6.83 inches. Both models are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i and have TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

    Tip: If you value compactness and one-handed use, the POCO X8 Pro will be more comfortable. For fans of large displays — the X8 Pro Max with its 6.83-inch panel is a better choice for movies and games.

    The touch sampling rate is 480 Hz (Game Turbo) in both models, and PWM dimming operates at 3,840 Hz — this is important for those sensitive to screen flicker.

    POCO X8 Pro — AMOLED display 6.59 inches with 3500 nits brightness

    Processor and performance — this is where the POCO X8 Pro Max excels

    This is one of the biggest differences when comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra in a 4-nanometer manufacturing process, while the Pro Max received the flagship Dimensity 9500s made in a 3 nm process.

    The performance difference is clear — the POCO X8 Pro score in AnTuTu v11 is 2,283,558 points, while the POCO X8 Pro Max reaches 3,085,998 in AnTuTu:

    TestPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro MaxDifference
    AnTuTu v112,283,5583,085,998+35%
    Manufacturing process4 nm (TSMC)3 nmNewer
    GPUMali-G720 MC8Immortalis-G925 MC12Higher class

    The Dimensity 9500s in the POCO X8 Pro Max is a flagship segment chip — the same processor can be found in phones costing over 3,000 PLN. The Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU provides smooth gameplay even in the most demanding mobile games, such as Genshin Impact or Honkai: Star Rail at the highest settings.

    POCO X8 Pro with Dimensity 8500-Ultra also performs very well in everyday use — multitasking, social media, and gaming at medium settings are not a problem. However, in benchmarks and intensive games, the 35% difference in favor of the Max model is noticeable.

    Both smartphones feature the POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system with a surface area of 5,300 mm², which effectively dissipates heat during longer gaming sessions.

    It is worth mentioning that both models support 5G network (SA/NSA) — this is the standard in 2026, but still an important parameter when choosing a new smartphone. The RAM in both cases is LPDDR5X, and the internal storage is UFS 4.1 — the fastest available standards in the mid-premium segment.

    Camera — Light Fusion 600 vs Sony IMX882

    Both models have a main camera of 50 MP with optical image stabilization (OIS), but the sensors used differ significantly.

    POCO X8 Pro uses the Sony IMX882 — a proven sensor with a size of 1/1.95 inches and 0.8 μm pixels. It is a solid sensor that performs well in daylight and well-lit scenes.

    POCO X8 Pro Max received the newer Light Fusion 600 with 1.6 μm pixels — twice as large as those in the X8 Pro. The Dual Native ISO Fusion technology improves dynamic range and significantly enhances photo quality in low light. In practice, this means less noise in night photos and better details in shadows.

    The remaining elements of the camera set are identical:
    – Ultra-wide angle — 8 MP, f/2.2
    – Front — 20 MP, f/2.2
    – Video recording — 4K at 30/60 fps, slow motion 960 fps

    Tip: If you often take photos in the evening or in poorly lit interiors, the POCO X8 Pro Max with the Light Fusion 600 sensor will be a noticeably better choice.

    Battery and charging — 6,500 vs 8,500 mAh

    This is another category where the POCO X8 Pro Max clearly dominates. The 8,500 mAh battery (silicon-carbon technology) is 30% more than the 6,500 mAh in the Pro model.

    ParameterPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    Capacity6,500 mAh8,500 mAh
    Wired charging100 W HyperCharge100 W HyperCharge
    Reverse charging27 W27 W
    Wireless chargingNoNo
    Battery life≥80% after 1,600 cycles≥80% after 1,600 cycles

    In practice, the POCO X8 Pro Max easily lasts two full days of moderate use, and with light usage, even three days. The POCO X8 Pro comfortably provides a full day even with intensive use.

    Both models charge at a power of 100 W — the POCO X8 Pro Max recovers 50% of energy in about 24 minutes, and a full charge takes just over 50 minutes. Neither model supports wireless charging.

    If you are looking for a fast wall charger that supports 100 W, it’s worth choosing a model with USB Power Delivery (fast charging standard) or a dedicated Xiaomi charger. A compact power bank with the appropriate output power will also be useful for daily charging on the go.

    Construction and design — aluminum, glass, and IP69K

    Both smartphones have aluminum frames, Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the front, and an IP68/IP69K certification — they can withstand immersion in water as well as a stream of hot water under pressure. This is rare in this price range. Despite their durability, it’s worth protecting the display — screen protectors will provide additional protection against scratches in everyday use.

    ParameterPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    Dimensions157.5 × 75.2 × 8.4 mm162.9 × 77.9 × 8.2 mm
    Weight201.5 g218 g
    Back coverGlassFiberglass
    SIMDual nano-SIMDual nano-SIM + eSIM
    RGB backlight8 colors8 colors
    ColorsBlack, White, Mint GreenBlack, White, Blue

    POCO X8 Pro is lighter by 16.5 g and slightly narrower — it fits better in the hand and fits into narrower pockets. The Max model is slimmer (8.2 vs 8.4 mm), but larger and heavier due to the bigger battery and display.

    It’s worth mentioning that the POCO X8 Pro is also available in a limited Iron Man edition (12/512 GB) for 1,749 PLN on promotion — this is a variant for Marvel fans.

    Regardless of the chosen model, it’s good to invest in a suitable case for the POCO smartphone that will protect the aluminum frame and glass or fiberglass back from mechanical damage.

    POCO X8 Pro — design and construction with an aluminum frame

    Connectivity — Wi-Fi 7 and eSIM only in the Max model

    In terms of connectivity, the POCO X8 Pro Max offers several significant improvements:

    • Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) instead of Wi-Fi 6 — faster transfer and lower latency
    • eSIM — a convenient solution while traveling, without the need to swap physical SIM cards
    • Bluetooth 5.4 with Auracast — wireless audio sharing to multiple headphones simultaneously
    • Symmetrical stereo speakers — better sound than the standard stereo speakers in the X8 Pro

    POCO X8 Pro 5G and POCO X8 Pro Max 5G support both SA and NSA modes. Other common connectivity features include NFC, infrared port (IR blaster), USB-C 2.0, GPS L1+L5, and Dolby Atmos with Hi-Res Audio (24-bit/192 kHz). Neither model has a 3.5 mm headphone jack — if you prefer wireless audio, check out Bluetooth headphones compatible with both smartphones.

    Security and Software

    Both smartphones run on Android 16 with HyperOS 3 and will receive 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. They also have access to Google Gemini, Circle to Search, and AI tools (AI Writing, AI Speech).

    The key difference concerns the fingerprint reader:

    • POCO X8 Pro — optical reader under the screen
    • POCO X8 Pro Max — ultrasonic reader under the screen

    The ultrasonic reader works faster, is more precise, and recognizes the finger even when wet — this is a clear advantage of the Max model.

    POCO X8 Pro Max also offers the Xiaomi Offline Communication feature with a range of up to 500 m — it allows communication with other Xiaomi devices without access to the internet or cellular network.

    Price of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in Poland

    How much do these smartphones cost? The price of POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, and the price of POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN in the promotional launch (until March 31, 2026):

    VariantPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    8/256 GB1,399 PLN (only mi.com)
    12/256 GB1,799 PLN (only mi.com)
    12/512 GB1,599 PLN1,999 PLN
    Iron Man 12/512 GB1,749 PLN

    Regular prices (after promotion):

    VariantPOCO X8 ProPOCO X8 Pro Max
    8/256 GB1,699 zł
    12/256 GB2,099 zł
    12/512 GB1,899 zł2,299 zł
    Iron Man 12/512 GB1,999 zł

    The difference of 400 zł between comparable variants (12/512 GB) is a reasonable surcharge for the flagship processor, larger battery, better camera, and Wi-Fi 7. You can find current prices and availability on the official POCO website.

    Gaming performance — how do they perform in practice?

    Simply comparing AnTuTu scores does not provide the full picture. In everyday use, both smartphones perform excellently — apps open instantly, multitasking works smoothly, and scrolling through the interface is fluid at 120 Hz.

    The difference becomes noticeable in demanding mobile games. The POCO X8 Pro Max with the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU maintains a stable 60 fps in Genshin Impact at the highest graphics settings, while the POCO X8 Pro with the Mali-G720 MC8 requires lowering some options to medium to maintain fluidity. In less demanding titles — PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, or Honkai: Star Rail — both models run smoothly at high settings.

    The POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system works effectively in both cases. After a 30-minute session of Genshin Impact, the casing temperatures remain within a comfortable range. The POCO X8 Pro Max has a slight advantage here due to its larger casing, which dissipates heat better.

    For casual gamers, the POCO X8 Pro will be more than sufficient. However, if you regularly play the most demanding titles and care about maximum graphic settings, the Dimensity 9500s in the Max model is a safer choice for the years to come.

    POCO X8 Pro Max vs competition — how does it compare to rivals?

    It is worth looking at both POCO models in the context of the market. In the price range of 1,400–2,300 PLN, the competition is significant:

    • Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (~1,699 PLN) — better Samsung ecosystem, longer support (7 years of updates), but noticeably weaker Exynos 1580 processor and smaller 5,000 mAh battery. The POCO X8 Pro offers more performance for a similar price.
    • Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (~1,599 PLN) — a close relative from the Xiaomi family. Similar specifications to the POCO X8 Pro, but slightly weaker Dimensity 8400-Ultra and smaller 6,200 mAh battery. POCO stands out with an IP69K certification.
    • Nothing Phone (3a) (~1,799 PLN) — distinguished by its Glyph lighting design, pure Android, but weaker processor and smaller battery. A choice for those who prioritize aesthetics.
    • Motorola Edge 60 (~1,899 PLN) — a competitor with wireless charging, which is lacking in POCO. However, it falls short in performance compared to the POCO X8 Pro Max.

    POCO X8 Pro Max priced at 1,999 PLN (12/512 GB) offers performance comparable to smartphones costing over 3,000 PLN — Samsung Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, or Xiaomi 15. This is its biggest competitive advantage.

    Summary of differences — who wins in each category?

    CategoryWinnerWhy?
    DisplayPOCO X8 Pro MaxLarger 6.83″ panel
    PerformancePOCO X8 Pro MaxDimensity 9500s, +35% in AnTuTu
    CameraPOCO X8 Pro MaxLight Fusion 600, better night photos
    BatteryPOCO X8 Pro Max8,500 vs 6,500 mAh
    CompactnessPOCO X8 ProLighter (201.5 g), narrower
    PricePOCO X8 ProFrom 1,399 PLN
    ConnectivityPOCO X8 Pro MaxWi-Fi 7, eSIM, Auracast
    BiometricsPOCO X8 Pro MaxUltrasonic reader

    POCO X8 Pro Max wins in six out of eight categories — but POCO X8 Pro stands its ground with its price and compact dimensions.

    POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

    The choice between POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max depends on your priorities and budget.

    Choose POCO X8 Pro if:
    – You are looking for the best value for money under 1,700 PLN
    – You prefer a compact and lighter smartphone (201.5 g vs 218 g)
    – You don’t need flagship performance — Dimensity 8500-Ultra is more than enough for everyday tasks
    – You are interested in the limited Iron Man edition

    Choose POCO X8 Pro Max if:
    – You want a flagship Dimensity 9500s processor with performance comparable to phones costing over 3,000 PLN
    – You care about the longest battery life — 8,500 mAh lasts 2–3 days without charging
    – You take a lot of photos in low light — Light Fusion 600 makes a noticeable difference
    – You need eSIM or Wi-Fi 7
    – You value a faster and more accurate ultrasonic fingerprint reader

    Our verdict: For an additional 400 PLN, POCO X8 Pro Max offers significantly more — a flagship processor, a huge battery, and a better camera. It is one of the best smartphones in terms of price to performance ratio in 2026. However, if compactness and a lower price are priorities, POCO X8 Pro remains an excellent choice.

    In summary, comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — both smartphones offer excellent value, but the Max model targets users who want flagship performance without the flagship price.

    Are you looking for accessories for your new POCO smartphone? Check out cases and tempered glass for POCO phones at Home Screen — you’ll find protection tailored to your model.

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

    POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — what are the differences?

    The main differences are the processor (Dimensity 8500-Ultra vs flagship Dimensity 9500s), battery (6,500 vs 8,500 mAh), camera sensor (Sony IMX882 vs Light Fusion 600 with larger pixels), fingerprint reader (optical vs ultrasonic), and connectivity (Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7, no eSIM vs eSIM).

    Is the POCO X8 Pro Max worth the extra 400 PLN?

    Yes — for an additional 400 PLN, you get a flagship processor with 35% higher performance, a battery that is 2,000 mAh larger, a better camera for night photos, Wi-Fi 7, and eSIM. It’s one of the better upgrades on the smartphone market.

    What is the price of the POCO X8 Pro in Poland?

    The POCO X8 Pro costs from 1,399 PLN (8/256 GB, promotional price) to 1,899 PLN (12/512 GB, regular price). There is also a limited Iron Man edition available for 1,749–1,999 PLN.

    Are the POCO X8 Pro and X8 Pro Max waterproof?

    Yes — both models have an IP68 and IP69K certification, which means they are resistant to immersion in water (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes) and to a stream of hot water under pressure.

    How long does the battery last in the POCO X8 Pro Max?

    The 8,500 mAh battery in the POCO X8 Pro Max lasts for 2–3 days of moderate use. The 100 W HyperCharge charging allows you to regain 50% of the energy in about 24 minutes.

    Does the POCO X8 Pro have eSIM?

    No — eSIM is only available in the POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model supports only two physical nano-SIM cards.

  • AirPods Max 2 — premiere, price, and specifications of the new Apple headphones

    AirPods Max 2 — premiere, price, and specifications of the new Apple headphones

    AirPods Max 2 are the new over-ear headphones from Apple with the H2 chip, offering 1.5x better active noise cancellation than the previous generation. The price in Poland is 2499 zł, pre-orders start on March 25, 2026, and deliveries will begin in early April.

    Four years of waiting and the same price — sounds like good news. But has Apple changed enough to justify replacing the old Max? We check what exactly you get for that 2499 zł.

    Technical specifications of AirPods Max 2

    ParameterAirPods Max (1st gen)AirPods Max 2
    ChipApple H1Apple H2
    Bluetooth5.05.3
    ANCStandard1.5x better
    Lossless audio24-bit / 48 kHz (USB-C)
    Transparency modeYesEnhanced
    Adaptive Audio
    Conversation detection
    Voice isolation
    Live translation
    Personalized volume
    Battery lifeup to 20 hup to 20 h
    ConnectionLightning / USB-CUSB-C
    Weight384.8 g386.2 g
    Colors55 (new palette)
    Price in Poland2499 zł (USB-C)2499 zł

    H2 Chip — the heart of the new AirPods Max 2

    The biggest change is hidden under the aluminum casing. The new Apple AirPods Max use the H2 chip (the same one that debuted in AirPods Pro 2), and the improvements concern three key areas:

    • Better noise cancellation — new computational algorithms analyze the surrounding sound up to 48,000 times per second, resulting in 1.5x more effective ANC than in the first generation
    • Lower wireless latency — Bluetooth 5.3 reduces audio lag, which gamers and movie lovers will appreciate
    • Lossless audio support — via USB-C cable, you can listen to music in 24-bit / 48 kHz quality (Apple Lossless)

    The H2 chip also supports personalized spatial audio with dynamic head tracking — the effect is closest to what you know from the cinema. The result? On paper, it’s the same amplifier with a wide dynamic range, but in practice, the bass sounds fuller, and individual instruments are easier to extract from the mix. The difference is most noticeable in orchestral music and well-produced recordings on Apple Music — with a pop playlist, you might not notice it.

    You can find the full range of Apple over-ear headphones at homescreen.pl.


    New smart features

    The new Apple AirPods Max take on features known from AirPods Pro 3, which were previously unavailable in the over-ear version.

    Adaptive Audio is a feature that makes you stop thinking about headphone modes. Are you entering a café? The headphones automatically let in the voices around you. Are you getting on a train? ANC kicks in at full power. Conversation Awareness works similarly — when you start speaking, the music fades out, and the voice of your conversation partner is amplified. You don’t have to take off your headphones to order a coffee.

    Voice Isolation does the same thing, but in the opposite direction — during a phone call, your conversation partner hears only you, even if you are calling from a busy street. All three features work without any configuration.

    Live Translation requires an iPhone with iOS 26 and Apple Intelligence — so for now, it only works on iPhone 16 and newer. The headphones translate the conversation in real time, displaying subtitles on the phone screen. It sounds futuristic, but in practice, it’s more of a help for simple conversations than a substitute for a translator. A dozen languages are supported, including Polish.

    Personalized Volume learns your preferences and automatically adjusts the volume level to the environment — Marek, who commutes by subway to work every day and then sits in an open space, will appreciate this feature the most.


    Price of AirPods Max 2 in Poland

    Apple AirPods Max 2 cost in Poland 2499 zł — exactly the same as the USB-C version of the original AirPods Max. This is an amount that clearly positions them in the premium segment.

    For comparison:

    ModelPrice in PolandType
    AirPods 4approx. 549 złIn-ear, open
    AirPods Pro 3approx. 1099 złIn-ear, ANC
    AirPods Max 22499 złOver-ear, ANC
    Sony WH-1000XM5approx. 1299 złOver-ear, ANC
    Bose QuietComfort Ultraapprox. 1699 złOver-ear, ANC

    2499 zł for wireless headphones is a lot — almost twice as much as the Sony WH-1000XM5, which regularly compete neck and neck with the Max in blind sound tests. What are you paying extra for? Primarily for integration with the Apple ecosystem: automatic switching between iPhone, iPad, and Mac works so smoothly that after a week you’ll forget you ever manually changed devices. Features like live translation are an additional argument, but — let’s be honest — for most users, it’s a curiosity, not a reason to buy.


    Design and materials — what has changed?

    Short answer: almost nothing. If you placed AirPods Max 1 vs 2 side by side, the only visible difference would be the color. Apple did not change the shape, weight (386 g — they are still among the heaviest popular over-ear headphones), or construction:

    • Aluminum ear cups with independent rotation provide a perfect fit
    • Mesh headband evenly distributes pressure on the top of the head
    • Memory foam ear cushions — comfortable even during long hours of wear
    • Digital Crown is used to adjust volume and control playback
    • Listening mode button — a new element replacing the noise control button

    However, the color palette is new. Instead of Space Gray, Silver, Sky Blue, Pink, and Green, we get: Midnight, Moonlight, Blue, Purple, and Orange. The orange variant is particularly bold, standing out against Apple’s typically muted offerings.


    AirPods Max 2 vs AirPods Max — is the upgrade worth it?

    If you have the original AirPods Max with the H1 chip, upgrading to the second generation makes sense in three cases:

    1. You care about better ANC — 1.5x more effective noise cancellation is a noticeable difference, especially in public transport and open spaces
    2. You want Adaptive Audio and Conversation Awareness — smart features that automate mode switching are a real convenience in everyday use
    3. You need live translation — if you travel or work in an international environment, Live Translation can be a game-changer

    However, if your current AirPods Max are working flawlessly and you mainly listen to music at home — don’t replace them. The sound quality has improved, but not enough for you to notice a difference during everyday listening on Spotify. It’s better to wait for the third generation.

    Advice: If you have AirPods Max with Lightning, the upgrade makes additional sense — you gain USB-C, which simplifies the cable setup and adds lossless audio.

    For everyday charging, any USB-C charger will suffice — and you can find the full range of all AirPods models and headphones at homescreen.pl.


    Ecology — Apple moves forward

    Apple emphasizes sustainability in AirPods Max 2:

    • 100% recycled rare earth metals in magnets
    • 100% recycled polyester in ear cushions
    • 100% recycled gold and tin in circuit boards
    • Packaging made entirely from paper from natural fibers

    This is a continuation of the Apple Carbon Neutral 2030 strategy, which encompasses more and more product categories. You can find the full specifications of AirPods Max 2 on the official Apple website.


    Summary — who are the AirPods Max 2 for?

    AirPods Max 2 is an evolution, not a revolution. Apple has put a new chip into an old case, and you get significantly better ANC, smart features from AirPods Pro 3, and lossless audio via USB-C. But you don’t get a new design, longer battery life, or a lower price. These are the best over-ear headphones from Apple that you can buy today.

    Worth buying if:
    – You use multiple Apple devices and value seamless integration
    – You are looking for top-notch ANC for working in a noisy environment
    – You want live translation features or Adaptive Audio

    Consider alternatives if:
    – You don’t need the Apple ecosystem — Sony WH-1000XM5 or Bose QC Ultra offer comparable ANC at a lower price. Compare over-ear headphones with ANC at homescreen.pl
    – You prefer in-ear — AirPods Pro 3 have the same H2 chip for less than half the price

    Our choice: AirPods Max 2 in Northern color — classic, versatile, and you won’t get bored of it after a year.

    In the store homescreen.pl, you will find cases tailored to various generations and models of AirPods – from classic models (1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation), through the newer AirPods 4, to models AirPods Pro 2 or AirPods Pro 3. This way, you can easily choose a protective case perfectly suited to your headphones, regardless of which generation or variant you have.

    Check all accessories for AirPods at homescreen.pl →


    FAQ — frequently asked questions

    When is the release of AirPods Max 2 in Poland?

    Orders for the new headphones start on March 25, 2026, and the first deliveries in Poland will begin in early April 2026. They will be available in authorized Apple stores and through retail partners.

    How much do AirPods Max 2 cost in Poland?

    The price of the second generation in Poland is 2499 PLN — the same as the USB-C version of the previous model. In the USA, the price is 549 dollars.

    What are the differences between AirPods Max 2 and the first generation?

    The main differences are the H2 chip instead of H1, 1.5x better noise cancellation, Bluetooth 5.3, lossless audio via USB-C, and new features: Adaptive Audio, Conversation Detection, Voice Isolation, and Live Translation. The design and battery (20 h) remain unchanged.

    Do AirPods Max 2 have USB-C?

    Yes, the second generation uses only the USB-C port for charging and wired listening to lossless music (24-bit / 48 kHz).

    What colors are available for AirPods Max 2?

    The new model is available in five colors: Midnight (black), Lunar Glow (gold), Blue, Purple, and Orange. This is a completely new palette compared to the first generation.

    Is it worth buying AirPods Max 2 instead of Sony WH-1000XM5?

    The second generation Apple Max headphones are a better choice for users of the Apple ecosystem due to automatic switching between devices and smart features. The Sony WH-1000XM5 offers comparable ANC at a lower price (around 1299 PLN) and works better with Android devices.

  • TOP 10 MagSafe Cases for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra [2026]

    TOP 10 MagSafe Cases for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra [2026]

    The best MagSafe cases for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are the Samsung Slim Magnet (299 PLN) with a perfect fit from the phone manufacturer and the PITAKA Edge Case (289 PLN) made of ultra-light aramid fiber. We have ranked them from premium models to budget options, so you can choose a case that meets your expectations and budget.

    The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is one of the most expensive smartphones on the market, so a suitable MagSafe case is not a luxury but a necessity. The magnetic attachment opens access to the entire ecosystem of accessories, from wireless chargers, through power banks, to car mounts. In this ranking, we have gathered the 10 best MagSafe cases for the Galaxy S26 Ultra, testing each for protection, material quality, design, and price-to-quality ratio. Whether you are looking for a premium MagSafe case for the S26 Ultra or a budget case with magnets for the Samsung S26 Ultra, you will find the perfect model here.

    Comparison table of MagSafe cases for the Galaxy S26 Ultra

    PositionCaseMaterialPriceMagSafeStand
    1.Samsung Slim MagnetPlastic299 PLN
    2.PITAKA Edge CaseAramid fiber289 PLN
    3.Supcase Cosmo MagPC + TPU155 PLN
    4.Karl Lagerfeld Embossed RingEco leather + TPU + PC149 PLN
    5.Guess Rhinestone Round LogoTPU + PC139 PLN
    6.Spigen Nano Pop MagTPU109 PLN
    7.ESR Classic Hybrid KickstandPC + acrylic + TPU85 PLN
    8.Spigen Ultra Hybrid MagTPU + PC79 PLN
    9.Ringke Silicone MagneticSilicone + PC + microfiber79 PLN
    10.3MK Satin Armor MagCasePC + TPU69.90 PLN

    Ranking of MagSafe cases for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

    1. Samsung Slim Magnet, original from the manufacturer (299 PLN)

    Samsung Slim Magnet opens the ranking as the only case from the smartphone manufacturer. The perfect fit for Galaxy S26 Ultra is no coincidence. Samsung designs the case in parallel with the phone, ensuring millimeter precision.

    The slim construction emphasizes the elegant design of the smartphone, and the built-in magnets guarantee the best compatibility with original Samsung accessories. This magnetic case for the Galaxy S26 Ultra protects against scratches and light impacts while maintaining a natural, stable grip.

    The price of 299 zł is the highest in the ranking, but for the original case from Samsung, you pay for the guarantee of perfect fit, the best magnetic compatibility, and availability in several colors, including an elegant light blue.

    Our premium choice: Samsung Slim Magnet for 299 zł, original case from the manufacturer with perfect fit and the strongest magnets.

    2. PITAKA Edge Case, aramid fiber with Fusion Weaving (289 zł)

    PITAKA Edge Case is a proposal for demanding users who appreciate minimalism and premium materials. The case is made of aramid fiber using Fusion Weaving technology. This is the same material used in bulletproof vests and Formula 1 racing.

    Despite the advanced material, the case maintains an ultra-slim profile, adding almost no thickness to the phone. The textured surface provides a secure grip, and the raised edges around the camera protect the lenses from contact with the ground.

    The Milky Way Galaxy pattern gives the case a unique appearance. The price of 289 PLN is justified by the quality of workmanship and the durability of aramid fiber, which is 5 times stronger than steel while being lighter than most plastic cases.

    3. Supcase Cosmo Mag, armored protection with style (155 PLN)

    Supcase Cosmo Mag is the only case in the ranking that combines Military Grade certification with a designer pattern. The two-part construction with polycarbonate (PC) back and a transparent cover provides top-level protection.

    Reinforced corners with Air Cushion technology, raised edges around the screen and camera, and button covers make for a complete protective set. The aluminum finger ring also serves as a stand in both vertical and horizontal orientations.

    The price of 155 PLN (or 139.50 PLN in a set) is a reasonable amount for a case that can withstand a fall from over a meter high. The Coral pattern stands out against the competition.

    4. Karl Lagerfeld Embossed Ring, luxury fashion (149 PLN)

    Karl Lagerfeld Embossed Ring Initials is a case for fashion lovers and luxury brands. Made of high-quality eco-leather, adorned with embossed initials KL and a metal inscription KARL LAGERFELD.

    The button covers and camera frame made of aluminum give the case a premium character. The magnetic ring compatible with MagSafe allows for wireless charging without removing the case.

    The price of 149 zł is a reasonable amount for a licensed case from a fashion brand that turns the Galaxy S26 Ultra into a true fashion statement. The brown color variant matches elegant styles and catches the eye with its embossed details.

    5. Guess Rhinestone Round Logo, elegance with character (139 zł)

    Guess Rhinestone Round Logo is a stylish option for those who appreciate recognizable fashion brands. The distinctive round 4G logo and Rhinestone Round branding give the case a refined look.

    Flexible sides allow for easy installation and removal, while raised edges protect the phone’s screen. The MagSafe magnetic ring ensures full compatibility with wireless chargers and MagSafe accessories.

    For 139 zł this licensed case combines protection with fashion design. The beige color variant fits both elegant and casual styles. Full access to ports and buttons, along with precise fitting for the Galaxy S26 Ultra, makes the case as practical as it is stylish.

    6. Spigen Nano Pop Mag, colorful design (109 zł)

    Spigen Nano Pop Mag is a case for those who want to stand out from the crowd. The two-tone, contrasting design with a colorful frame lifting the lens is a real eye-catcher. The Avo Green version combines dark green back with a light green frame.

    Made of durable TPU polyurethane, with Air Cushion technology in the corners to absorb impacts. The matte finish provides a non-slip grip and reduces fingerprints.

    For 109 PLN, you get a solid case with character. The built-in MagSafe ring and precise cutouts for all ports and buttons enhance functionality. It’s the perfect choice if you’re looking for something between premium and budget.

    7. ESR Classic Hybrid Kickstand, with built-in stand (85 PLN)

    ESR Classic Hybrid Kickstand features a metal stand integrated with the camera frame. It works in both vertical and horizontal orientations, making it ideal for watching movies, video calls, or following recipes in the kitchen.

    The hybrid construction combines a polycarbonate (PC) and acrylic back with a flexible TPU frame. The result? Solid protection without adding bulk to the phone. The built-in MagSafe ring ensures compatibility with wireless charging and magnetic accessories.

    For 85 PLN, it is the only case in the ranking with a stand. Raised edges around the screen and lenses protect against scratches, while the matte Frosted Black finish gives it an elegant character.

    8. Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag, transparent with Air Cushion (79 PLN)

    Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag is a case that combines transparency with solid protection. The hybrid design with a flexible TPU frame and rigid polycarbonate (PC) back ensures that the phone is safe while being visible in all its glory.

    Air Cushion technology in the reinforced corners effectively absorbs impacts. The raised edges protect both the display and the camera module from scratches on flat surfaces. The built-in magnetic ring provides a stable connection with MagSafe accessories and wireless charging without removing the case.

    For 79 PLN, it offers the best price-to-quality ratio in the entire ranking. It is perfect for those who want to showcase the original design of the Galaxy S26 Ultra without sacrificing protection.

    Best price-to-quality ratio: Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag for 79 PLN, a transparent case with Air Cushion and full MagSafe compatibility.

    9. Ringke Silicone Magnetic, best grip (79 PLN)

    Ringke Silicone Magnetic is a case for those who value a secure grip and pleasant materials to the touch. The soft silicone outer layer, reinforced PC frame, and microfiber-lined interior create a three-layer protection.

    The anti-slip surface ensures that the phone won’t slip out of your hand even during intense use. Integrated button covers and precise cutouts for ports guarantee full access to all smartphone functions.

    The price of 79 PLN and solid construction make it one of the best silicone cases with MagSafe on the market. The built-in magnetic ring ensures hassle-free wireless charging.

    10. 3MK Satin Armor MagCase, solid protection at the best price (69.90 PLN)

    3MK Satin Armor MagCase ranks as the cheapest case in the comparison, but with parameters that put more expensive competitors to shame. The satin, matte surface reduces fingerprints and provides an elegant look, while the Absorber175 standard guarantees protection from falls from heights of up to 175 cm.

    With a thickness of just 1.5 mm, it is one of the thinnest MagSafe cases on the market. The combination of polycarbonate (PC) and flexible TPU creates a structure that protects without adding unnecessary bulk. Raised edges protect the camera and screen.

    At 69.90 PLN, it is an absolute must-have for those looking for MagSafe protection at an affordable price. The Polish manufacturer 3MK is known for high-quality protective accessories. Proof? Military Grade certification in a case costing less than 70 PLN.

    Best price in the ranking: 3MK Satin Armor MagCase for 69.90 PLN, satin finish, Military Grade protection, and a thickness of 1.5 mm.

    What to pay attention to when choosing a MagSafe case for the Galaxy S26 Ultra?

    When choosing a magnetic case for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (MagSafe case), it’s worth paying attention to a few key aspects that affect daily use.

    The strength of the magnets determines how stably the case works with accessories. The original Samsung case and models from reputable brands like Spigen or PITAKA offer the strongest magnetic connection, which is particularly important when using car mounts.

    The material affects durability, grip, and appearance. Aramid fiber (PITAKA) is the lightest and most durable choice. TPU with polycarbonate (Spigen, ESR) combines flexibility with rigidity. Silicone (Ringke) provides the best grip. Eco-leather (Karl Lagerfeld) looks luxurious but requires more care.

    The level of protection varies significantly. If you tend to drop your phone, choose a case with a Military Grade certification (Supcase, 3MK) or Air Cushion technology (Spigen). For everyday use without extreme conditions, standard protection is sufficient.

    Compatibility with Qi2 is another important aspect. The Qi2 standard (the successor to Qi) uses magnets for precise positioning of the phone on the charger. All MagSafe cases for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra in our ranking support this standard, so you can charge wirelessly without removing the case.

    Design vs protection is an age-old compromise. Ultra-slim cases like the PITAKA Edge Case look great but offer less protection than the rugged Supcase Cosmo Mag. Consider whether your lifestyle requires reinforced protection or if basic safeguarding against everyday scratches is sufficient.

    Which MagSafe case for Galaxy S26 Ultra to choose? Recommendations

    Choosing the best MagSafe case for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra depends on your priorities. Below you will find recommendations tailored to specific needs.

    If you want a case from the phone manufacturer, Samsung Slim Magnet (299 PLN) guarantees a perfect fit and the best compatibility with original Samsung accessories. It’s a natural choice for fans of the Galaxy ecosystem.

    If you value premium materials and minimalism, PITAKA Edge Case (289 PLN) made of aramid fiber is an unparalleled option. Its ultra-slim profile and weight of just a few grams make it feel almost non-existent on your phone.

    If you need maximum protection, opt for Supcase Cosmo Mag (155 PLN) with Military Grade certification and reinforced corners. For budget-friendly alternatives, consider 3MK Satin Armor MagCase (69.90 PLN) with Absorber175 standard.

    If you care about appearance and a recognizable fashion brand, consider the Karl Lagerfeld Embossed Ring (149 PLN) made of eco-leather or the Guess Rhinestone Round Logo (139 PLN) featuring the iconic 4G logo.

    If you’re looking for a case with a stand, the only sensible choice is the ESR Classic Hybrid Kickstand (85 PLN). The metal stand built into the camera frame allows you to set the phone in both vertical and horizontal orientation.

    If you want the best price-to-quality ratio, choose the Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag (79 PLN). Transparent back, Air Cushion, and MagSafe for under 80 PLN is a hard offer to beat. An alternative is the Ringke Silicone Magnetic (79 PLN) with a pleasant silicone finish.

    Summary: the best MagSafe cases for Galaxy S26 Ultra

    The market for the best Galaxy S26 Ultra cases with MagSafe offers solutions for every budget, from 69.90 PLN (3MK Satin Armor) to 299 PLN (Samsung Slim Magnet). At the top of the ranking are premium models that guarantee a perfect fit and the highest quality materials, but there are also great options available at affordable prices.

    If budget is not an issue, Samsung Slim Magnet and PITAKA Edge Case are cases that impress with their quality and design. Looking for the golden mean? Supcase Cosmo Mag for 155 PLN combines rugged protection with a designer pattern. And if your wallet matters, Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag (79 PLN) and 3MK Satin Armor MagCase (69.90 PLN) prove that great MagSafe protection doesn’t have to cost a fortune.

    All the cases from the ranking can be found in the offer of homescreen.pl in the category cases for Galaxy S26 Ultra. Check the full offer of MagSafe accessories to complete your set with a wireless charger or a magnetic mount.

    FAQ about MagSafe cases for Galaxy S26 Ultra

    Does Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra support MagSafe?

    Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra supports the magnetic accessory mounting technology thanks to built-in magnets compatible with the Qi2 standard. Cases with a MagSafe ring enhance this connection, providing more stable holding on chargers and mounts.

    Does the MagSafe case slow down wireless charging for the Galaxy S26 Ultra?

    No. All the cases in our ranking are designed not to interfere with wireless charging. The magnets inside the case precisely center the phone’s coil relative to the charger, which may even improve charging efficiency compared to charging without a case.

    Which MagSafe case for the Galaxy S26 Ultra is the most durable?

    The most durable case in the ranking is the PITAKA Edge Case made of aramid fiber, a material 5 times stronger than steel. If you are looking for the best protection against drops, choose the Supcase Cosmo Mag with Military Grade certification or the 3MK Satin Armor MagCase with Absorber175 standard.

    Does the MagSafe case fit Qi2 chargers?

    Yes. The MagSafe technology is fully compatible with the Qi2 standard (the successor to Qi). Cases with a magnetic ring provide a stable connection with Qi2 chargers, improving phone positioning and charging efficiency.

    Which MagSafe case for the Galaxy S26 Ultra to choose on a budget?

    On a budget, the best choice is the 3MK Satin Armor MagCase for 69.90 PLN. It offers a satin finish, Military Grade protection, and a thickness of just 1.5 mm. Alternatives are the Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag and Ringke Silicone Magnetic, both priced at 79 PLN.

    How much does a MagSafe case for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra cost?

    Prices for MagSafe cases for the Galaxy S26 Ultra start at 69.90 PLN (3MK Satin Armor MagCase) and go up to 299 PLN (Samsung Slim Magnet). Most models from reputable brands fall within the range of 79-155 PLN, allowing you to find a solid case without straining your budget.

  • Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs Poco F7 Pro – detailed comparison

    Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs Poco F7 Pro – detailed comparison

    If you are looking for the best POCO phone in Poland at the end of 2025, choose the POCO F8 Pro — it offers a more powerful processor, a better camera with a telephoto lens, and a larger battery with faster charging. But if you care about a great 2K screen and want to spend less than 2000 PLN, the POCO F7 Pro is still an excellent option.

    📊 Comparison of specifications POCO F7 PRO vs POCO F8 PRO

    Feature / ParameterPOCO F7 ProPOCO F8 Pro
    ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 3Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm, Oryon)
    GPUAdreno 750Adreno 830
    RAM / Internal Memory12 GB LPDDR5X + 256 / 512 GB UFS 4.112 GB LPDDR5X + 256 / 512 GB UFS 4.1
    Display6.67″ AMOLED, 3200×1440, 120 Hz6.59″ AMOLED, 2510×1156, 120 Hz, 3500 nit
    Rear Cameras50 MP (main) + 8 MP (ultrawide)50 MP (main) + 50 MP tele + 8 MP ultrawide
    Selfie Camera20 MP20 MP
    Battery6000 mAh6210 mAh
    Charging90W HyperCharge100W HyperCharge + 22.5W reverse charge
    Body / Dimensions / Weight160.26 × 74.95 × 8.12 mm — 206 g157.49 × 75.25 × 8.0 mm — 199 g
    SIM / eSIMDual nanoSIMnanoSIM + nanoSIM / nanoSIM + eSIM / eSIM + eSIM
    Water ResistanceIP68IP68
    Operating SystemHyperOS 2 (Android 15)HyperOS 3 (Android 16)
    Connectivity / Wi-Fi / BluetoothWi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4Wi-Fi 7 (8×8 MU-MIMO), Bluetooth 5.4
    Approximate Price (PL)about 1800–2000 PLN (promotions)about 2099–2299 PLN

    Display and External Appearance

    What has changed in the design and display of POCO F8 Pro compared to F7 Pro?

    In terms of appearance and build quality, both models present a high level, but the POCO F8 Pro introduces a few subtle changes that affect daily ergonomics:

    • Smaller dimensions and lower weight: The F8 Pro is shorter (157.5 mm vs 160.3 mm) and lighter (199 g vs 206 g), which translates to more comfortable one-handed use.
    • Rounded edges and better grip: The new shape of the F8 Pro features gentle curves and a thinner bottom bezel, making the phone fit better in the hand.
    • Identical IP68 resistance class: Both smartphones are resistant to dust and immersion in water up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes, confirming a high standard of workmanship.

    The change in form is not revolutionary, but the F8 Pro is noticeably more compact and “smoother” in daily use – without compromising on sturdiness.

    ➡️ If you want to improve the protection and grip of the device, choose the appropriate  case for POCO F7 Pro or case for POCO F8 Pro.


    Screen: sharpness vs brightness – which is better for the eyes?

    POCO F7 Pro impresses with its classic form – a flat 6.67″ AMOLED display with WQHD+ resolution (3200×1440 px) and thin, symmetrical bezels. With 12-bit color depth, support for HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, and very high sharpness (526 ppi), it is the perfect display for those who value detail – for reading, watching high-quality movies, or playing graphically intensive games.

    The POCO F8 Pro features a smaller 6.59″ screen with a resolution of 2510×1156 px (446 ppi). Importantly, it has a significantly higher peak brightness – up to 3500 nits (vs 3200 nits in F7 Pro), making it better for outdoor use. Additionally, it supports Wet Touch 2.0 mode, which enhances touch responsiveness in rain or with wet fingers – a rarity even among flagships.

    Both displays support 120 Hz refresh rate and advanced dimming (PWM/DC), but differ in priority: F7 Pro focuses on sharpness and pixel density, while F8 Pro prioritizes comfort in all lighting conditions. – the screen responds better to touch in humid conditions. Both displays are top quality, but the choice depends on whether detail (F7 Pro) or brightness and response time (F8 Pro) is more important.

    ➡️ Check the matched tempered glass for POCO F7 Pro or tempered glass for POCO F8 Pro to avoid screen damage.


    Cameras and Photo-Video Capabilities

    Telephoto vs No Tele – an advantage that is immediately visible

    Both smartphones use the same, very good 50 MP Light Fusion 800 sensor as the main camera. It is a 1/1.55″ sensor with OIS, large 2.0 μm pixels (after 4-in-1 binning) and excellent photo quality both day and night. However, this is where the similarities end.

    🔍 POCO F8 Pro – a huge leap thanks to the 50 MP telephoto lens

    F8 Pro is the only one in this pair that has a dedicated 50 MP telephoto lens with a focal length of 60 mm, which offers:

    • 2× optical zoom without loss of quality,
    • significantly better portrait photos with natural background separation,
    • sharper detail photos from a greater distance,
    • Super Moon mode and adaptive zoom.

    This makes the F8 Pro clearly more versatile in photography.

    🌄 POCO F7 Pro – only wide and ultra-wide

    The F7 Pro offers two cameras:

    • 50 MP main (the same as in F8 Pro),
    • 8 MP ultra-wide.

    The lack of a telephoto lens means that every zoom is digital, so quality decreases with close-ups. Portraits also look weaker – the bokeh effect is more artificial.

    🎥 Video – both record in 8K, but the F8 Pro does it better

    • F7 Pro: 8K 24 fps, 4K 60 fps.
    • F8 Pro: 8K 30 fps, 4K 60 fps + more stabilization modes.

    Additionally, the F8 Pro offers:

    • director mode,
    • dual video recording,
    • ShootSteady,
    • better motion tracking.

    🤳 Selfie Camera – tie

    Both phones have the same 20 MP front camera, offering HDR, portrait mode, and 1080p 60 fps recording.

    Section summary: If you take a lot of photos, especially portraits and close-ups — the F8 Pro is a crushing winner. The F7 Pro provides great quality from the main sensor, but it lacks versatility.


    Battery and Charging

    Greater capacity or greater convenience? Differences you can feel every day

    In terms of battery, both models perform excellently, but they differ in their approach to runtime and additional features.

    🔋 POCO F7 Pro — solid 6000 mAh battery

    • Capacity: 6000 mAh
    • Wired charging: 90W HyperCharge
    • No reverse charging

    The F7 Pro offers very good runtime — even 7–8 hours SOT, and with 90W it can be charged quickly. This is an excellent battery in its price range.

    ⚡ POCO F8 Pro — larger battery, faster charging, and power bank function

    • Capacity: 6210 mAh (210 mAh more)
    • Wired charging: 100W HyperCharge (full charge in about 30 minutes)
    • Reverse charging 22.5W — you can charge your headphones, smartwatch, or a second phone

    The F8 Pro offers a realistically longer battery life (on average +40–60 minutes) and additionally acts as a portable power bank thanks to fast reverse charging.

    📌 Which smartphone has a better battery?

    • If you care about maximum convenience and the fastest charging → choose POCO F8 Pro.
    • If you want very good battery life at a lower price → the F7 Pro is still a great choice.

    In practice: the advantage of the F8 Pro is clear, as it combines greater capacity, better charging technology, and additional features that the F7 Pro does not offer.

    ➡️ To take advantage of the full power of 100W, it’s worth checking fast chargers for POCO F8 Pro, which support the PD/PPS standard and enable the fastest possible charging of the phone.


    Performance and Computing Power

    Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in POCO F7 Pro – powerful, stable, predictable

    Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 has long been Qualcomm’s most powerful processor and still performs excellently in 2025. It is a chip that guarantees:

    • high level of fluidity in applications,
    • stable performance even during long gaming sessions,
    • good cooling performance and energy efficiency.

    In everyday use, the F7 Pro operates dynamically — switching apps, multitasking, and media handling are fast and seamless. In gaming, the phone maintains frame rates very well, although in the heaviest FPS titles, it can slightly drop after longer sessions.

    In short: The F7 Pro still offers flagship-level performance, but at a lower price.


    Snapdragon 8 Elite in POCO F8 Pro – groundbreaking Oryon architecture

    The Snapdragon 8 Elite is in a completely different league. Qualcomm has implemented the Oryon architecture, which is significantly more advanced than classic ARM cores.

    The main advantages:

    • significantly higher single-core performance, which is felt with every touch of the screen,
    • much stronger Performance cores, which maintain stable clock speeds under heavier loads,
    • better performance with AI and multimedia, which affects photo and video processing, transcription, and content recognition.

    In practice, the F8 Pro works faster — apps open instantly, animations are more responsive, and the phone hardly slows down even with 30–40 apps in the background.


    System and Smart Features

    HyperOS 2 vs HyperOS 3 – is the difference noticeable?

    POCO F7 Pro runs on HyperOS 2 (Android 15), while the POCO F8 Pro debuts with HyperOS 3 based on Android 16. Although the interface is visually similar, the differences are clear in performance and system features.

    HyperOS 3 in POCO F8 Pro — faster, smoother, smarter

    The new version of HyperOS introduces several improvements:

    • better power management thanks to the new processor workload schedule,
    • more responsive animations — utilizing the higher performance of Oryon,
    • enhanced AI modules that speed up photo processing, translations, and searches,
    • greater stability of background applications due to RAM optimization.

    F8 Pro also leverages the power of Snapdragon 8 Elite for AI features that F7 Pro does not support, e.g., at such quality or speed.

    HyperOS 2 in POCO F7 Pro — still fast, but less flexible

    HyperOS 2 is a very stable and lightweight system that offers:

    • quick app switching,
    • intuitive gestures,
    • wide customization options,
    • good RAM management.

    It works great, but it lacks some AI enhancements that only appeared in version 3.


    🔐 Security and Biometrics

    Both phones offer:

    • ultrasonic fingerprint reader in the display,
    • AI facial recognition,
    • regular security updates.

    The difference is that F8 Pro will be supported longer, as HyperOS 3 is a newer generation of the system.


    Conclusions — which system is better?

    • F7 Pro → fast, stable, refined, ideal for those who do not need next-generation AI features.
    • F8 Pro → more future-proof, faster in animations, smarter, better utilizes processor power.

    👉 If you care about up-to-date software and the best responsiveness — F8 Pro wins.


    Connectivity and Global Standards

    eSIM, 5G, Wi-Fi — here is one of the key differences

    In terms of connectivity, both models offer a full set of modern technologies, but the POCO F8 Pro has a more flexible SIM configuration and newer wireless connectivity standards.


    SIM Cards — F8 Pro’s Advantage with eSIM Support

    POCO F7 Pro

    • Dual nanoSIM (2× physical cards)
      No eSIM support.

    POCO F8 Pro

    • nano SIM + nano SIM
      or
    • nano SIM + eSIM
      or
    • eSIM + eSIM

    eSIM requires activation with the operator and may have roaming restrictions — depending on the country and service provider.

    This is a significant advantage of the F8 Pro, especially for those using:

    • two numbers,
    • foreign profiles,
    • eSIM cards in a smartwatch or for easy operator switching.

    Supported 5G and LTE bands

    Both phones support the same key bands:

    • 5G SA/NSA,
    • wide range of TDD and FDD bands for Europe,
    • full operator support in Poland (Orange, Play, Plus, T-Mobile).

    However, the F8 Pro has a somewhat richer list of bands, especially in 5G SA/NSA, making it more future-proof.


    📡 Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

    F7 Pro

    • Wi-Fi 7, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5
    • Bluetooth 5.4

    F8 Pro

    • Wi-Fi 7 (more comprehensive support, 8×8 MU-MIMO),
    • support for multiple links (multi-link),
    • Bluetooth 5.4,
    • support for LDAC, LHDC 5.0, AptX Adaptive, and a full set of codecs.

    In practice:

    • F8 Pro has more stable connections in crowded networks,
    • better BT sound quality,
    • lower latency in games.

    GPS and location

    Both models have very broad support for global systems:

    • GPS L1+L5
    • Galileo E1+E5a
    • QZSS
    • GLONASS
    • Beidou
    • NavIC

    The differences in practice are minimal — both phones offer fast and precise positioning, even in the city.


    Connectivity Summary

    POCO F8 Pro wins because it offers:

    • eSIM in multiple configurations,
    • more advanced Wi-Fi 7,
    • wider range of 5G bands,
    • better audio BT codecs.

    F7 Pro is still very good, but the F8 Pro offers more options and is more future-proof.


    Prices and Availability in Poland

    What are the prices of POCO F7 Pro and F8 Pro?

    • In official Polish sales, the list price of the F8 Pro (12 GB RAM + 512 GB) is 2299 PLN.
    • The cheaper variant of the F8 Pro (12/256 GB) started at 2099 PLN
    • Some stores may also have promotional offers — then the price may be lower, although it rarely drops to a level similar to the F7 Pro. 

    Conclusions:

    • The F8 Pro currently ranks above the level of “budget flagships” — the price of approx. 2099–2299 PLN reflects its modern features (telephoto lens, eSIM, powerful processor).
    • If you find the F7 Pro on sale (~1800–2000 PLN), it may be more cost-effective with a good compromise between price and capabilities.
    • The F8 Pro offers more options for the future — better camera, eSIM, faster charging — but you will pay more for it.

    Summary: Which model to choose?

    🔥 POCO F8 Pro — the choice for those who want:

    • the best possible performance (Snapdragon 8 Elite with Oryon architecture),
    • a better camera with 50 MP telephoto lens,
    • support for eSIM in various configurations,
    • a larger battery and 100W faster charging,
    • a more compact and lighter design,
    • longer system support (HyperOS 3).

    This is a more future-proof, versatile phone aimed at demanding users.


    💎 POCO F7 Pro — a choice for those who want:

    • a great screen WQHD+ 3200×1440 (a rarity at this price),
    • a very powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor,
    • a large 6000 mAh battery with 90W fast charging,
    • top gaming performance at a lower price,
    • a reasonable price/quality ratio.

    This is the best choice if you care about flagship components but don’t want to exceed 2000 PLN (during promotions).


    Final Verdict

    • If you want the best POCO 2025, choose F8 Pro.
    • If you want the best value for money, choose F7 Pro.
    • If you mainly care about a 2K display, F7 Pro wins — F8 Pro has a brighter screen but lower resolution.
    • If you care about camera versatility, there’s no discussion — F8 Pro with a telephoto lens definitely wins.

    FAQ — Frequently Asked Questions

    ⭐ 1. Which POCO has a better camera — F7 Pro or F8 Pro?

    Definitely F8 Pro. It has a 50 MP telephoto lens with 2× optical zoom and better stabilization modes.
    F7 Pro only has a main camera + ultra-wide.


    ⭐ 2. Does POCO F7 Pro support eSIM?

    No. It only supports 2× nanoSIM.
    eSIM works only in POCO F8 Pro.


    ⭐ 3. Which model has a better battery?

    F8 Pro has a larger battery (6210 mAh) and faster charging of 100W + reverse charging.
    F7 Pro has 6000 mAh and 90W.


    ⭐ 4. Which screen is better?

    • F7 Pro — higher WQHD+ resolution and pixel density (ideal for content).
    • F8 Pro — much higher brightness (3500 nits) and better outdoor visibility.

    The choice depends on your priorities.


    ⭐ 5. Is it worth paying extra for F8 Pro?

    Yes, if you care about the best cameras, eSIM, performance, and charging.
    If you want to spend less and have a great 2K screen — F7 Pro is still excellent.


    ⭐ 6. Which model performs better in gaming?

    F8 Pro, thanks to the Adreno 830 GPU, is more stable during long sessions and heats up less.
    F7 Pro still delivers flagship performance, but F8 Pro wins in 3D gaming.


    ⭐ 7. Do both models have IP68 water resistance?

    Yes — both F7 Pro and F8 Pro have IP68 (submersion 1.5 m for 30 min).

     

     

  • The best cases for Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro [2026]

    The best cases for Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro [2026]

    The best case for Galaxy Buds 4 is the Spigen Rugged Armor (85 PLN) – durable, with a matte finish and precise fit for the charging case. If you’re looking for a cheaper option, the Tech-Protect Slim Hook at 39 PLN offers a carabiner and a slim design. All cases in this ranking fit both Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro.

    Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro are among the most interesting true wireless headphones on the market. However, the charging cases are prone to scratches and mechanical damage. In this guide, we compare eight protective cases from Spigen, Ringke, and Tech-Protect.

    We advise what to pay attention to when choosing and which case will work best depending on your needs. Looking for a case for an older model? Check out the case for Galaxy Buds 3 / 3 Pro.

    What to pay attention to when choosing a case for Galaxy Buds 4?

    Before we move on to the ranking, it’s worth knowing what to consider when choosing. A protective case for headphones is a small expense, but a good case for Galaxy Buds 4/4 Pro can protect your headphones from costly repairs.

    Material and type of protection

    Protective cases for Galaxy Buds 4 are made from three main materials. TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) is the most common choice – flexible, shock-absorbing, and scratch-resistant. Silicone provides a better grip and a pleasant texture, but it may attract dust. Polycarbonate (PC) offers rigid protection and a sleek appearance, but it absorbs falls less effectively.

    The best protection is provided by dual-layer cases, combining a soft TPU core with a rigid polycarbonate outer shell. This solution is used, among others, by Spigen in the Lock Fit model.

    Carabiner and Hook

    Many users carry their headphones with them all day. A case with a carabiner or hook allows you to attach the Galaxy Buds 4 to a backpack, belt, or bag. This convenient solution minimizes the risk of losing the charging case.

    Not every carabiner is equally sturdy. Metal hooks (like in Spigen Lock Fit) are more durable than plastic ones, but they add some weight.

    Compatibility with Wireless Charging and MagSafe

    All cases in this ranking allow for Qi wireless charging without removing the cover. It’s worth paying attention to models with a cutout for the LED – this way, you can immediately see the charging status. If you are looking for a wireless charger compatible with Galaxy Buds 4, you can find it in our offer.

    An interesting option is the Ringke Onyx Magnetic with built-in MagSafe magnets. If you use a MagSafe charger or a magnetic mount, the case will provide a stable attachment.

    Fit for Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro

    Both Samsung headphone models – Galaxy Buds 4 and Galaxy Buds 4 Pro – have identical dimensions for the charging case. All protective cases in this ranking fit both versions.

    Ranking – best cases for Galaxy Buds 4 / 4 Pro

    We tested the offer available at homescreen.pl and selected the eight best cases. Here is our ranking – from the best to the cheapest.

    1. Spigen Rugged Armor – durable and stylish (85 PLN)

    Our choice in the category of best protection

    Spigen Rugged Armor is a proven series, known for smartphone cases. The version for Galaxy Buds 4 maintains the same high standard. Made of flexible TPU with a characteristic carbon fiber pattern, it provides solid protection against drops and scratches.

    The case has precise cutouts for the USB-C port and LED indicator. The Matte Black finish does not collect fingerprints. On the back, you’ll find a hook for a carabiner (included). The whole thing weighs just a few grams and does not add unnecessary bulk.

    Advantages:
    – Proven brand with many years of experience
    – Matte finish resistant to fingerprints
    – Carabiner included
    – Compatible with Qi wireless charging

    Disadvantages:
    – Available only in black
    – No version with MagSafe

    2. Spigen Lock Fit – premium with metal carabiner (145 PLN)

    Spigen Lock Fit is the most expensive case in this comparison, but also the most advanced. The two-piece construction made of polycarbonate and TPU provides the highest level of protection. The metal carabiner is exceptionally sturdy and will not accidentally detach.

    The case closes with a snap, eliminating the risk of the earbuds falling out. The matte black finish looks premium and feels good in hand. If you care about maximum protection and don’t mind the higher price – Lock Fit is the best option.

    Advantages:
    – Two-layer construction PC + TPU
    – Metal, sturdy carabiner
    – Snap closure system
    – Best protection in the ranking

    Disadvantages:
    – Highest price (145 PLN)
    – Adds some thickness

    3. Spigen Classic Fit – elegant style (109 PLN)

    Spigen Classic Fit stands out from the competition with its elegant design. The leather-like finish gives the Galaxy Buds 4 a more prestigious look. Underneath, there is a solid TPU layer that protects against impacts.

    This case is perfect if you value style and don’t want your headphones to look like survival gear. Classic Fit pairs well with an elegant set of accessories for Galaxy Watch or a leather smartphone case.

    Advantages:
    – Elegant leather-like finish
    – Solid TPU protection underneath
    – Good grip in hand
    – Carabiner included

    Disadvantages:
    – Higher price than silicone cases
    – Finish may wear over time

    4. Ringke Onyx Magnetic MagSafe – for fans of magnetic charging (59 zł)

    Ringke Onyx Magnetic is a unique case with built-in magnets compatible with MagSafe. If you use a MagSafe charger, magnetic power bank, or car mount – this case will connect perfectly with them.

    Made of flexible TPU with a textured surface. Provides a secure grip and solid protection against scratches. Available in four colors: Black, Sage Green, Constant Coral, and Warm Grey.

    Advantages:
    – Built-in MagSafe magnets
    – Four color variants
    – Textured surface for better grip
    – Good value for money

    Disadvantages:
    – No carabiner included
    – Magnets add a small weight

    5. Ringke Silicone – soft silicone in many colors (55 PLN)

    Ringke Silicone is a classic silicone case with a pleasant-to-touch surface. The silicone provides an excellent grip – the case won’t slip out of your hand or off the table. Available in Black, Light Purple, Pink Sand, and Stone colors.

    The cutouts for the charging port and LED are precise. The case absorbs minor drops well, although it does not offer as advanced protection as Spigen models. It is a solid choice in the mid-price range.

    Advantages:
    – Pleasant, matte texture of silicone
    – Four colors to choose from
    – Excellent grip
    – Precise cutouts

    Disadvantages:
    – Silicone may attract dust and particles
    – No carabiner

    6. Tech-Protect Slim Hook – slim with a hook (39 zł)

    Tech-Protect Slim Hook combines a slim design with a practical hook. The TPU case is thin, lightweight, and does not add unnecessary bulk. The built-in hook allows you to attach the headphones to a bag or belt.

    Available in three colors: Black, Fluffy Blue, and Olive Green. At this price, it’s hard to find a better balance of functionality to price. If you’re looking for a case with a carabiner but don’t want to spend over 80 PLN – Slim Hook is a perfect choice.

    Advantages:
    – Hook/carabiner included
    – Slim design
    – Three color variants
    – Attractive price

    Disadvantages:
    – Plastic hook (less durable than metal)
    – Basic level of protection

    7. Tech-Protect FlexAir – transparent and minimalist (25 PLN)

    Tech-Protect FlexAir is a transparent case made of flexible TPU. Ideal if you want to showcase the original color of the Galaxy Buds 4 charging case while providing basic protection against scratches.

    The transparent case may slightly yellow over time due to UV exposure – this is a natural characteristic of the material. In return, you get a minimalist look and full compatibility with wireless charging for only 25 PLN.

    Advantages:
    – Transparent design – shows the original color of the headphones
    – Very low price
    – Minimalist and lightweight
    – Compatible with Qi charging

    Disadvantages:
    – May yellow over time
    – No carabiner
    – Basic protection

    8. Tech-Protect Silicone Hook – lowest price with hook (19 PLN)

    Best price in the ranking

    Tech-Protect Silicone Hook is the cheapest case in the comparison – and yet it offers a silicone construction with a built-in hook. For 19 PLN, you get protection against scratches, a convenient hook for attachment, and a pleasant silicone texture.

    Available in Black, Navy Blue, Dusty Pink, and Lavender. This is an ideal choice if you are looking for a cheap everyday case or want to have a few colors to switch between.

    Advantages:
    – Lowest price on the market (19 PLN)
    – Hook included
    – Four colors
    – Silicone texture

    Disadvantages:
    – Thinner silicone than in more expensive models
    – Less precise fit

    Comparison of cases for Galaxy Buds 4 – summary table

    CaseMaterialCarabinerMagSafeColorsPrice
    Spigen Rugged ArmorTPU185 zł
    Spigen Lock FitPC + TPU✅ (metal)1145 zł
    Spigen Classic FitTPU + eco-leather1109 zł
    Ringke Onyx MagneticTPU459 zł
    Ringke SiliconeSilicone455 zł
    Tech-Protect Slim HookTPU339 zł
    Tech-Protect FlexAirTPU125 zł
    Tech-Protect Silicone HookSilicone419 zł

    Which case to choose? Recommendations based on needs

    The choice of case depends on your priorities. Here are our recommendations tailored to different scenarios.

    If you care about the best protection – choose Spigen Lock Fit (145 zł). The dual-layer construction and metal carabiner provide the highest level of security. It will be suitable if you travel often or work in demanding conditions. Are you gathering accessories for the new Samsung? Also check out cases for the Galaxy S26 Ultra.

    If you are looking for the best value for moneySpigen Rugged Armor (85 PLN) is the golden mean. Solid protection, a carabiner included, and proven Spigen quality. Our number one in this ranking.

    If you use MagSafe – the only choice is Ringke Onyx Magnetic (59 PLN). Built-in magnets ensure compatibility with MagSafe chargers and accessories.

    If you want a case with a carabiner at a low priceTech-Protect Slim Hook (39 PLN) combines a practical hook with a slim design. For even more savings – Tech-Protect Silicone Hook for 19 PLN.

    If you value style and eleganceSpigen Classic Fit (109 PLN) with a leather-like finish fits a more formal outfit. Meanwhile, Ringke Silicone (55 PLN) offers a nice texture and pastel colors.

    If you want to maintain the original look – the transparent Tech-Protect FlexAir (25 PLN) shows the factory color of the charging case.

    Tip: Regardless of the case you choose, all models in this ranking allow for Qi wireless charging without removing the case. So you don’t have to worry about compatibility with chargers.

    Summary

    The case for Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro is a small investment that will protect your headphones from scratches and drops. Our favorite is Spigen Rugged Armor (85 PLN) – it combines solid protection with an elegant matte finish and a carabiner included.

    If you have a limited budget, Tech-Protect Silicone Hook for 19 PLN offers surprisingly much for its price. And for fans of magnetic charging, the only option with MagSafe is Ringke Onyx Magnetic (59 PLN).

    Check the full offer cases for Galaxy Buds 4 / 4 Pro at homescreen.pl and choose a model suited to your needs. Are you interested in other audio accessories? At homescreen.pl you will also find headphones, speakers, and microphones.

    FAQ

    Does the case for Galaxy Buds 4 also fit Galaxy Buds 4 Pro?

    Yes. Galaxy Buds 4 and Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have identical dimensions of the charging case. All protective cases from this ranking fit both models of Samsung headphones. However, keep in mind that the cases from this ranking do not fit older models. If you have Galaxy Buds 2, Buds Pro, or Buds Live, check cases for older models of Galaxy Buds.

    Can I wirelessly charge Galaxy Buds 4 with the case on?

    Yes, all the cases in our ranking are compatible with Qi wireless charging. You don’t need to remove the case to charge the headphones on the induction charger.

    Which case for Galaxy Buds 4 is the cheapest?

    The cheapest case in our ranking is the Tech-Protect Silicone Hook for 19 PLN. Despite the low price, it offers a silicone construction, a clip for attachment, and four color variants.

    Does the case for Galaxy Buds 4 have a carabiner?

    Not all of them. The following have a carabiner or clip: Spigen Rugged Armor, Spigen Lock Fit, Spigen Classic Fit, Tech-Protect Slim Hook, and Tech-Protect Silicone Hook. The Ringke and Tech-Protect FlexAir models do not have a clip.

    Which case for Galaxy Buds 4 has MagSafe?

    The only case with built-in MagSafe magnets in our offer is the Ringke Onyx Magnetic (59 PLN). It allows you to attach the headphones to chargers and magnetic accessories.

    Is it worth buying a case for Galaxy Buds 4?

    Definitely yes. The charging case for Galaxy Buds 4 is prone to scratches and can crack upon falling. A protective case costing 19-145 PLN is a small expense compared to the price of new headphones or repairs.

  • The Best Accessories for Google Pixel 10a — Cases, Glass Protectors, and Chargers for 2026

    The Best Accessories for Google Pixel 10a — Cases, Glass Protectors, and Chargers for 2026

    The best case for the Pixel 10a is the Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN) — transparent with raised edges and Air Cushion technology. The cheapest? The Bizon Case Salpa for 25 PLN. The Pixel 10a has a plastic back, so a case is not a luxury, but a necessity.

    The Google Pixel 10a debuted on March 5, 2026. For 549 EUR, you get a Tensor G4 processor, a 48 MP camera with OIS, a 120 Hz display with Gorilla Glass 7i, and a 5100 mAh battery with 30W charging. It’s a great smartphone for its price — but it has a plastic back that scratches easily.

    In this guide, you will find the best accessories for the Pixel 10a: cases starting from 25 PLN, tempered glass, and chargers that utilize the full potential of 30W fast charging.

    Tip: The Pixel 10a supports 10W Qi wireless charging, but it does not have native MagSafe or Qi2. Cases with a magnetic ring (e.g., Tech-Protect or Ringke MagSafe) add compatibility with MagSafe accessories.

    Ranking: 5 best cases for the Pixel 10a

    1. Spigen Ultra Hybrid — transparent with Air Cushion (59 PLN)

    Our choice

    Spigen Ultra Hybrid is a proven series — a transparent polycarbonate back with a flexible TPU frame. Air Cushion technology in the corners absorbs impacts, and raised edges protect the screen and camera.

    • Air Cushion Technology — air cushions in the corners
    • Transparent back — shows the original color of the Pixel 10a
    • Raised edges — screen and camera protection
    • Precise cutouts for all ports and buttons

    The Pixel 10a has a flat camera module (without a protruding “island”), so the case sits perfectly on any surface. For 59 PLN, you get Spigen’s proven quality and assurance of fit.

    ParameterValue
    MaterialTPU + polycarbonate
    TypeTransparent
    MagSafe
    Price59 PLN

    2. Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe — magnetic transparent (65 PLN)

    Pixel 10a does not have native MagSafe, but Ringke Fusion Magnetic adds a built-in magnetic ring. Thanks to it, you can use magnetic chargers, power banks, and car mounts — just like iPhone users.

    • Built-in MagSafe ring — compatibility with magnetic chargers and accessories
    • Transparent polycarbonate — resistant to yellowing
    • Raised edges around the screen and camera
    • Precise cutouts for USB-C and speakers

    At 65 PLN, this is the most expensive case in the comparison, but the only transparent one with full MagSafe. If you plan to use wireless chargers or magnetic mounts, it’s the best choice.

    ParameterValue
    MaterialTPU + polycarbonate
    TypeTransparent
    MagSafe
    Price65 PLN

    3. Tech-Protect Flexair Hybrid MagSafe — budget MagSafe (35 PLN)

    Best price with MagSafe

    Tech-Protect Flexair is half the price of Ringke, yet offers the same key features: a transparent hybrid with a built-in magnetic ring. The hybrid construction (TPU + PC) combines the flexibility of the frame with a hard, scratch-resistant back.

    • MagSafe — built-in magnetic ring
    • Hybrid TPU + PC — rigid back, flexible frame
    • Transparent — visible original color of the phone
    • Raised edges around the screen and camera

    At 35 PLN, it offers the best price-to-functionality ratio in the comparison. If you want MagSafe for the Pixel 10a and don’t want to overpay, Tech-Protect Flexair is a perfect choice.

    ParameterValue
    MaterialTPU + polycarbonate
    TypeTransparent
    MagSafe
    Price35 PLN

    4. 3MK Armor Case — armored protection (49.90 PLN)

    3MK Armor Case is a rugged case with reinforced corners and a textured back that doesn’t slip from your hand. The design absorbs impacts more effectively than standard TPU cases.

    • Reinforced corners — enhanced protection during falls
    • Textured back — non-slip surface
    • Matte finish — does not collect fingerprints
    • Raised edges around the screen and camera

    The plastic back of the Pixel 10a is particularly prone to scratches. The 3MK Armor Case ensures that even a fall on concrete won’t result in a crack. At 49.90 PLN, it’s a solid rugged case from a Polish brand.

    ParameterValue
    MaterialReinforced TPU
    TypeArmored
    MagSafe
    Price49.90 PLN

    5. Bizon Case Salpa — the cheapest protection (25 PLN)

    Lowest price

    Flexible TPU case for 25 PLN. Bizon Case Salpa is a minimalist, transparent cover that protects against scratches and light falls. It lacks Air Cushion and MagSafe, but it does what it needs to do — at a minimal price.

    • Flexible TPU — easy to put on and take off
    • Transparent — visible design of the Pixel 10a
    • Raised edges around the screen
    • Slim profile — does not add unnecessary thickness

    Perfect as a temporary case right after purchasing a phone or for those who do not need advanced protection. For 25 PLN, it’s hard to find a better option to start with.

    ParameterValue
    MaterialTPU
    TypeTransparent, flexible
    MagSafe
    Price25 PLN

    Comparison of cases for Pixel 10a

    CaseBrandTypeMagSafeFeaturePrice
    Ultra HybridSpigenTransparentAir Cushion, top brand59 PLN
    Fusion MagneticRingkeTransparentMagSafe + yellowing resistance65 PLN
    Flexair HybridTech-ProtectTransparentCheapest MagSafe35 PLN
    Armor Case3MKArmoredReinforced corners49.90 PLN
    SalpaBizonFlexibleLowest price25 PLN

    Our choice: Depends on the priority. MagSafe for cheap? Tech-Protect Flexair (35 PLN). Proven brand? Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN). Minimum expenses? Bizon Salpa (25 PLN).

    Tempered glass for Pixel 10a

    Pixel 10a has Gorilla Glass 7i on the front — it’s durable glass, but it’s not indestructible when dropped on concrete. Tempered glass adds a protective layer for a few dozen PLN.

    Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ 2-pack (25 PLN) — two glasses in a set for the price of one from the competition. Compatible with Pixel 9a and 10a (same screen size). The black frame masks the edges and gives an elegant look. Best value in this category.

    Ringke Tempered Glass 2-pack (39 zł) — premium option with an oleophobic coating (resistant to fingerprints) and a hardness of 9H. Two glasses in the set — one for now, the other as a spare.

    3MK FlexibleGlass (34,90 zł) — hybrid glass that combines the flexibility of a film with the hardness of glass. It does not shatter upon impact like traditional tempered glass. One piece in the package.

    Chargers and power banks for Pixel 10a

    Pixel 10a supports 30W charging via cable (USB PD 3.0) and 10W wirelessly (Qi). To take advantage of the full charging speed, you need a USB PD charger with a minimum power of 30W.

    Wall charger — look for models with USB-C PD 30W+. A GaN charger (gallium nitride) will be compact and efficient. Check wall chargers at homescreen.pl.

    Power bank — minimum 10,000 mAh with USB-C PD. If you bought a case with MagSafe (e.g., Ringke or Tech-Protect), a magnetic power bank will stick to the phone and charge it wirelessly. Power banks at homescreen.pl.

    USB-C Cable — The Pixel 10a has USB-C 3.2, so you need a USB-C to USB-C cable that supports PD 30W+. Most cables in the box are 2.0 versions — a 3.2 cable will be useful for data transfer.

    FAQ — Frequently Asked Questions about Pixel 10a Accessories

    Does the Pixel 10a support MagSafe?
    Not natively. The Pixel 10a has Qi standard (10W), but not MagSafe or Qi2. Cases with a built-in magnetic ring (e.g., Ringke Fusion Magnetic, Tech-Protect Flexair MagSafe) add compatibility with MagSafe accessories.

    Do cases from the Pixel 9a fit the Pixel 10a?
    No. The Pixel 10a has different dimensions (153.9 x 73 x 9 mm) than the Pixel 9a. Cases are not interchangeable between models. Tempered glass may be compatible — e.g., Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ is labeled as “Pixel 9a / 10a”.

    What charger for the Pixel 10a?
    A USB-C charger with PD (Power Delivery) of at least 30W. This provides full charging speed — 50% battery in 30 minutes.

    Is the Pixel 10a waterproof?
    Yes, it has an IP68 rating — dustproof and waterproof up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. A case is not required for waterproofing, but it protects against scratches and drops.

    Does the Pixel 10a have a glass back?
    No. The Pixel 10a has a plastic back — this is one of the reasons why a case is particularly important. Plastic scratches more easily than glass and doesn’t look as good after a few months without protection.

    How much do accessories for the Pixel 10a cost?
    Cases range from 25 PLN (Bizon Salpa) to 65 PLN (Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe). Tempered glass ranges from 25 PLN (Tech-Protect 2-pack) to 39 PLN (Ringke 2-pack). A complete protection set (case + glass) can be purchased for 50–100 PLN.

    Summary

    The Pixel 10a is a great smartphone, but the plastic back needs protection. The good news is that accessories are cheap — you can buy a complete set (case + tempered glass) for just 50 PLN.

    Key takeaways:

    • Best quality: Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN) — Air Cushion, transparent, trusted brand
    • Best with MagSafe: Ringke Fusion Magnetic (65 PLN) — magnetic ring + transparent
    • Best price-to-value ratio: Tech-Protect Flexair MagSafe (35 PLN) — MagSafe for half the price of Ringke
    • Rugged: 3MK Armor Case (49.90 PLN) — reinforced corners, Polish brand
    • Cheapest: Bizon Case Salpa (25 PLN) — minimum for minimum

    Don’t forget about tempered glass — Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ for 25 PLN (2 pieces!) is an absolute must-have.