Blog

  • The best cases for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro — 2026 ranking

    The best cases for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro — 2026 ranking

    The best case for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro is the Spigen Rugged Armor: flexible TPU with an internal Spider Web structure that disperses drop energy, and a raised edge around the camera island. The strongest protection for Xiaomi 17T Pro is provided by the armored 3mk Armor Case with a drop test from about 175 cm. The cheapest reasonable choice for both models is the transparent Bizon Case Salpa.

    Before you choose, remember two things. First, the case for Xiaomi 17T does not fit 17T Pro (and vice versa), as these are two phones with different dimensions. Second, wireless charging is only available on 17T Pro, so a magnetic case means something different on each model.

    Below you will find a ranking of 12 cases available immediately at homescreen.pl, divided into armored, magnetic, transparent, flip, and silicone. We took each feature from the manufacturer’s description, and the phone data from the official Xiaomi specifications.

    Status as of October 22, 2026: all cases in the ranking are in stock for both models, except for the 3mk Armor Case and 3mk Armor MagCase, which are only for 17T Pro. Do you have a regular Xiaomi 17 without the letter T? You can find your case in a separate ranking of cases for Xiaomi 17.

    Xiaomi 17T Pro in Deep Violet and Deep Blue colors — back of the phone with the Leica camera island

    Brief verdict: which case to choose for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro

    • Best overall: Spigen Rugged Armor (17T and 17T Pro) — slim TPU with Spider Web cushioning and carbon texture.
    • Maximum protection: 3mk Armor Case (for 17T Pro only) — Military Grade, drops from approx. 175 cm. For 17T: armored Bizon Case Tur.
    • With a magnet: 3mk Armor MagCase (17T Pro), Tech-Protect Magmat MagSafe, and Bizon Case MatteO (both models).
    • Transparent: 3mk Clear Case, and on a budget, Bizon Case Salpa.
    • Flip case: Tech-Protect Wallet with a stand or Bizon Case Pocket with four pockets.
    • Soft to the touch: silicone Bizon Soft Case in six colors.

    You can find the full range in the Xiaomi 17T cases and screen protectors and accessories for Xiaomi 17T Pro. There, each case comes in a separate version for its model.

    Ranking of cases for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro — table

    The order was determined based on protection confirmed in the manufacturer’s description (drop test, reinforced corners, raised lip around the camera), availability in versions for both models, and diversity of brands. Currently available for 17T and 17T Pro are Spigen, 3mk, Tech-Protect, and Bizon. ESR, UAG, Ringke and Nillkin are not in our range, which is why they are not included in the ranking.

    # Case Type Xiaomi 17T Xiaomi 17T Pro Magnet Price range
    1 Spigen Rugged Armor flexible TPU, shock-absorbing ✅ ✅ ❌ higher
    2 3mk Armor Case armored PC + TPU ❌ ✅ ❌ medium
    3 Bizon Case Tur armored TPU 2 mm ✅ ✅ ❌ low
    4 3mk Armor MagCase armored with ring ❌ ✅ ✅ higher
    5 Tech-Protect Magmat MagSafe hybrid with ring ✅ ✅ ✅ low
    6 Bizon Case MatteO matte with ring ✅ ✅ ✅ medium
    7 3mk Clear Case transparent TPU ✅ ✅ ❌ medium
    8 Bizon Case Salpa transparent TPU ✅ ✅ ❌ low
    9 Tech-Protect Wallet flip, faux leather ✅ ✅ ❌ medium
    10 Bizon Case Pocket flip, faux leather ✅ ✅ ❌ medium
    11 Bizon Soft Case silicone ✅ ✅ ❌ medium
    12 3mk Matt Case matte TPU 1.2 mm ✅ ✅ ❌ medium

    You can see the current prices in the tiles under the ranking sections. They are fetched from the store at the moment the page is opened.

    Does the case for Xiaomi 17T fit the 17T Pro?

    No. The case for Xiaomi 17T does not fit the 17T Pro and vice versa. The 17T Pro is 4.6 mm taller and 2.3 mm wider. In a case that is meant to snugly fit the body, this difference is insurmountable: the cutouts for buttons, ports, and the camera island are in different places.

    Xiaomi 17T Xiaomi 17T Pro
    Dimensions 157.6 × 75.2 × 8.17 mm 162.2 × 77.5 × 8.25 mm
    Weight 200 g 219 g
    Screen 6.59″, AMOLED 120 Hz 6.83″, AMOLED 144 Hz
    Rear Cameras Leica: 50 MP (23 mm) + periscope 50 MP (115 mm) + 12 MP (15 mm) Leica: 50 MP (23 mm) + periscope 50 MP (115 mm) + 12 MP (15 mm)
    Battery and Wired Charging 6500 mAh, 67 W 7000 mAh, 100 W
    Wireless Charging ❌ ✅ 50 W
    Resistance IP68 IP68

    The data comes from the official specifications of Xiaomi 17T and Xiaomi 17T Pro.

    The camera setup is the same in both models, so it’s easy to assume that the cases are also interchangeable. They are not. Case manufacturers make separate versions for each model, and none of the cases in our offer claim compatibility with both. So when buying, check the full name: “for Xiaomi 17T” or “for Xiaomi 17T Pro”.

    The same principle applies to screen protection. We cover the details and a ranking of screen protectors in our article on the best screen protector for the Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro. Cases from the main Xiaomi 17 series are also not compatible.

    Best rugged cases for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro

    Among the types of cases for 17T and 17T Pro, you most often look for rugged ones. In this group, three things matter: drop test rated by a number, reinforced corners, and a lip around the camera island that protrudes above the back.

    1. Spigen Rugged Armor: best overall

    Spigen Rugged Armor case for Xiaomi 17T Pro in Matte Black color

    Our overall choice

    Rugged Armor is made entirely of flexible TPU, but with an internal Spider Web structure. This web of channels behind the back disperses impact energy instead of transferring it directly to the phone’s casing.

    Raised edges surround the screen and camera island, so when the phone is placed on a table, the glass does not touch the surface. The sides have a texture that improves grip, and the back features a matte finish with a carbon fiber pattern.

    The slim form does not change the silhouette of the phone, and Spigen is one of the most recognizable case manufacturers. It is also available in a version for Xiaomi 17T.

    For whom: for most people who want one reliable case for everyday use. There is no magnet, so for magnetic mounts, choose options 4–6.

    2. 3mk Armor Case: the highest protection for 17T Pro

    3mk Armor Case for Xiaomi 17T Pro

    The strongest case for 17T Pro

    Here, protection has a specific number: 3mk declares compliance with Military Grade standards in drop tests from about 175 cm. The construction combines polycarbonate with TPU at a thickness of 1.5 mm, and reinforced corners absorb impact energy when dropped on the edge.

    The anti-slip surface reduces the risk of the phone slipping out of hand, which at 219 g is not lightweight. The buttons operate with EasyClick technology, meaning they maintain a distinct click despite the covers.

    For whom: for owners of the 17T Pro who work in the field or simply often drop their phone. There is no version for the 17T available.

    3. Bizon Case Tur: rugged for both models

    Rugged case Bizon Case Tur for Xiaomi 17T Pro in black

    Best rugged case for Xiaomi 17T

    Tur is made of flexible TPU with a thickness of 2 mm and has a microfiber layer inside. The grooves on the back and corners act like air cushions, while the textured sides help keep the phone in hand.

    There is a raised frame around the camera island with separate cutouts for the lenses, and the edge of the screen is slightly raised. Six colors are available: from black and navy blue to burgundy and red.

    Since the 3mk Armor Case does not have a version for 17T, Tur is the strongest case for Xiaomi 17T in our offer. The version for Xiaomi 17T can also be purchased as a set with tempered glass as Tur Pack.

    For whom: if you want rugged protection at the price of a regular case. It costs about one third less than Spigen.

    Best magnetic cases (MagSafe) for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro

    None of these phones have magnets in the casing, so a case with a magnetic ring is the only way to attach a car mount or a magnetic wallet to them. However, the models differ fundamentally in this regard.

    • Xiaomi 17T does not support wireless charging. The ring in the case is therefore only for accessories: car mounts, stands, and magnetic wallets. You cannot charge the phone on any wireless charger, with or without the case.
    • Xiaomi 17T Pro charges wirelessly at up to 50 W. This power is specified by Xiaomi for its HyperCharge charging, and the wireless charger is sold separately. Don’t expect the full 50 W on a universal wireless charger, but the ring in the case will center the phone on a magnetic charger.

    Don’t want to change the case? An alternative is a stick-on magnetic ring, although one built into the case is more reliable.

    4. 3mk Armor MagCase: armored with a magnet for 17T Pro

    Transparent 3mk Armor MagCase with a magnetic ring for Xiaomi 17T Pro

    Best with a magnet for 17T Pro

    This is the equivalent of No. 2 with an added magnetic ring. Polycarbonate and TPU, 1.5 mm thick, Military Grade standard with drop tests from about 175 cm and reinforced corners.

    The back is transparent, so the color of the phone is visible. 3mk confirms that the case does not block wireless charging, and the ring holds magnetic mounts without removing the case.

    For whom: if you charge the 17T Pro wirelessly or use a magnetic mount and do not want to give up armored protection. This is the most expensive option in the ranking.

    5. Tech-Protect Magmat MagSafe: the cheapest magnetic case for both models

    Tech-Protect Magmat MagSafe case with a magnetic ring for Xiaomi 17T Pro

    Best price-to-function ratio

    A hybrid in a classic layout: a flexible TPU frame absorbs impacts, while the hard polycarbonate back protects against scratches. The back features a built-in magnetic ring compatible with MagSafe accessories.

    The case is raised around the camera and screen, and the back has a transparent finish that does not obscure the phone’s appearance.

    This is the cheapest magnetic case in the comparison, available for the 17T Pro and for Xiaomi 17T.

    For whom: if you need a ring for a car mount, and the protection should be solid but not armored.

    6. Bizon Case MatteO: matte, magnetic and colorful

    Magnetic ring case Bizon Case MatteO for Xiaomi 17T Pro, smoky black

    MatteO combines a TPU frame with a polycarbonate back with a frosted matte finish that does not collect fingerprints. There are air cushions in the corners, and raised edges around the screen and camera.

    The lens cutout is a single full opening, so the case works with camera lens covers and lens protectors. Three finishes are available: smoky with a black, beige, or light pink frame. There is also a version for Xiaomi 17T and MatteO Pack sets with tempered glass included.

    For whom: if you want a magnet in a case that doesn’t look technical, and you plan to add a camera lens protector.

    [hs_products ids=”142715,140626,141111,148483,138824,140529″ cols=”3″ title=”Best cases for Xiaomi 17T Pro: positions 1–6″]

    Best transparent cases for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro

    Transparent cases show the color of the phone, but over time they can discolor. Both of the following are made of TPU, which is flexible and easy to put on.

    7. 3mk Clear Case: transparent from 3mk

    Transparent 3mk Clear Case for Xiaomi 17T Pro

    Best transparent

    Slim case made of flexible TPU with raised edges around the screen and camera. The smooth, slightly anti-slip surface fits well in the hand, and the case does not block wireless charging on the 17T Pro.

    In the version for Xiaomi 17T, 3mk additionally states a thickness of about 1.2 mm, Absorber125 cushioning technology, and yellowing-resistant material.

    For whom: if you bought a phone in a color you want to see, and prefer a brand specializing in protection.

    8. Bizon Case Salpa: the cheapest in the ranking

    Transparent Bizon Case Salpa case for Xiaomi 17T Pro

    Best price in the ranking

    Salpa costs less than half the price of Spigen, and has details that you won’t find in many more expensive cases. The inner side is dotted, so the case doesn’t stick to the back of the phone.

    The corners are reinforced, the edges are slightly raised above the screen, and each lens has a separate cutout with a raised edge. There is a cutout on the side for a lanyard, useful for a phone weighing 200–219 g. Salpa is also for Xiaomi 17T.

    For whom: if you are looking for a cheap, transparent case for everyday use or a backup for travel.

    Best flip cases for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro

    A flip case is the only type that also protects the screen without adding a screen protector. In both cases below, the folded-back flap turns into a stand for watching videos in landscape mode.

    9. Tech-Protect Wallet: classic wallet with a stand

    Tech-Protect Wallet case for Xiaomi 17T Pro in black

    Best flip case

    A faux leather flap with decorative stitching, with the phone held in a flexible TPU base. Inside there are pockets for cards, documents, and cash, and the magnetic closure prevents the flap from opening in your bag.

    The manufacturer clearly states that the case does not have a MagSafe magnet, so you cannot attach it to a magnetic mount. The version for Xiaomi 17T has the same features.

    For whom: if you want to leave your wallet at home and keep the screen covered in your pocket.

    10. Bizon Case Pocket: four pockets and three colors

    Bizon Case Pocket case for Xiaomi 17T Pro in black

    The Pocket has three card slots and one larger one for banknotes, so it holds more than a typical wallet case. Faux leather with TPU, magnetic flap closure, and button covers.

    The lens cutout is a single full opening, so the case works with camera lens protectors and covers. Available in black, brown, and navy blue, for the 17T Pro and for Xiaomi 17T.

    For whom: if you carry a few cards and want a color other than black.

    The best silicone and slim cases for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro

    11. Bizon Soft Case: silicone in six colors

    Bizon Soft Case silicone case for Xiaomi 17T Pro in blue color

    Best silicone

    Three layers: silicone on the outside, polycarbonate reinforcement, and soft microfiber on the inside, which does not scratch the back of the phone and absorbs shocks. The smooth surface does not collect fingerprints and is easy to clean.

    The edges are raised, and the lenses have separate cutouts. Six colors: black, blue, dark blue, dark green, purple, and dark purple. There is also a version for Xiaomi 17T.

    For whom: if the most important thing is how the phone feels in your hand, rather than maximum protection.

    12. 3mk Matt Case: the thinnest matte

    Black matte case 3mk Matt Case for Xiaomi 17T Pro

    Black TPU with a thickness of 1.2 mm with a matte, non-slip surface that does not show fingerprints. It has raised edges around the screen and camera, as well as button covers.

    The case does not block wireless charging, which is important for the 17T Pro. The version for Xiaomi 17T has the same parameters.

    For whom: if you want the phone to look almost as slim with the case on as it does without it.

    [hs_products ids=”141828,140688,138847,140685,142047,142727″ cols=”3″ title=”Cases for Xiaomi 17T Pro: positions 7–12″]

    Best budget cases for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro

    Cheap cases do not have to mean poor protection. The three cheapest items in the ranking are three different types:

    • Bizon Case Salpa — transparent, the cheapest in the comparison, with separate cutouts for the lenses.
    • Bizon Case Tur — armored TPU 2 mm with air cushions, about one third cheaper than Spigen.
    • Tech-Protect Magmat MagSafe — in the same price range as Tur, but with a magnetic ring.

    If you want to buy protection in one order, Bizon offers bundles with a case and tempered glass in one box. For the Xiaomi 17T, these include Bizon Case Clear Pack with two tempered glass screen protectors and the armored Tur Pack, and for both models, the MatteO Pack with a magnetic ring.

    How to choose a case for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro

    Camera protection

    Both phones have the same trio of Leica cameras in a bump that protrudes above the back. This is the first part that touches the surface when you lay the phone screen up. Look for a raised frame around the camera bump in the description. Most cases in this ranking have it.

    Also pay attention to the type of cutout. Separate cutouts for each lens (Salpa, Tur, Soft Case) protect the lens glass better. A single full cutout for the whole island (MatteO, Pocket) leaves room for camera lens protectors, such as Bizon Glass Lens for 17T Pro or 3mk Lens Protection for 17T.

    Wireless Charging

    This is the most important difference between the models. According to Xiaomi’s specifications, the Xiaomi 17T charges only by cable (67 W), so the note “compatible with wireless charging” in the description of the case for 17T is irrelevant.

    Xiaomi 17T Pro charges wirelessly up to 50 W. So choose a case whose manufacturer confirms compatibility with wireless charging, e.g., 3mk Armor MagCase, 3mk Clear Case, 3mk Matt Case, Bizon Tur, or Soft Case. Avoid metal plates stuck under the case, as they block charging.

    Material

    • TPU — flexible, provides good cushioning, and is easy to put on (Spigen, Tur, Salpa, Clear Case, Matt Case).
    • Polycarbonate + TPU — the rigid back does not deform, and the soft frame absorbs the impact (3mk Armor, Magmat, MatteO).
    • Silicone — the most pleasant to the touch and least slippery (Soft Case).
    • Faux leather — used in flip cases, looks elegant and protects the screen (Wallet, Pocket).

    Compatibility with screen protectors

    The lip of the case must not lift the edges of the screen protector. Bizon states in its descriptions the maximum size of a screen protector that will fit under its case, and screen protectors labeled “Case Friendly” have a narrower outline. You can find verified combinations in our ranking of screen protectors for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro.

    Summary

    • The best case for Xiaomi 17T and 17T Pro is Spigen Rugged Armor: slim TPU with Spider Web cushioning.
    • The strongest for 17T Pro is the 3mk Armor Case, and with a magnet, the 3mk Armor MagCase. For 17T, the strongest is the armored Bizon Case Tur.
    • Case for 17T does not fit 17T Pro: the difference of 4.6 mm in height and 2.3 mm in width shifts all cutouts.
    • Wireless charging is only available for 17T Pro (up to 50 W). On the 17T, the magnetic ring in the case is useful only for mounts and wallets.
    • On a budget, choose the transparent Salpa, the armored Tur, or the Magmat with a magnet.

    All cases from the ranking and screen protection can be found in the categories Xiaomi 17T and Xiaomi 17T Pro. Choose your model’s category and you will see only compatible products.

    [hs_products category=”2550″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Best Sellers for Xiaomi 17T Pro”]

    [hs_products category=”2548″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Best Sellers for Xiaomi 17T”]

    FAQ — frequently asked questions

    Does the case for Xiaomi 17T fit the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

    No. The Xiaomi 17T measures 157.6 × 75.2 × 8.17 mm, while the 17T Pro measures 162.2 × 77.5 × 8.25 mm, so the cutouts for buttons, ports, and the camera do not align. Buy cases labeled as “for Xiaomi 17T” or “for Xiaomi 17T Pro.”

    Does the case for Xiaomi 17 fit the Xiaomi 17T?

    No. The Xiaomi 17, 17T, and 17T Pro have three different bodies, and each model has its own cases. You will find the case for the regular Xiaomi 17 in a separate ranking.

    Does the Xiaomi 17T have wireless charging?

    No. According to Xiaomi’s specifications, the 17T model charges only via cable, with a power of up to 67 W. The Xiaomi 17T Pro supports wireless charging up to 50 W.

    Does a MagSafe case work with the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

    Yes, if it has a built-in magnetic ring, like the 3mk Armor MagCase, Tech-Protect Magmat MagSafe, or Bizon Case MatteO. The phone itself does not have magnets, so without such a case, magnetic accessories will not attach to it.

    Which rugged case should I choose for the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

    The strongest is the 3mk Armor Case, tested for drops from about 175 cm (Military Grade). If you also need a magnet, choose the 3mk Armor MagCase, or for a lower price, the Bizon Case Tur.

    Which flip case for Xiaomi 17T?

    Tech-Protect Wallet, if you want a classic wallet with a stand, or Bizon Case Pocket, if you need four pockets and a color other than black. Both have a magnetic flap closure.

  • vivo X500 Pro Max vs OPPO Find X10 Pro Max — which one to buy?

    vivo X500 Pro Max vs OPPO Find X10 Pro Max — which one to buy?

    vivo X500 Pro Max vs OPPO Find X10 Pro Max is a zoom vs versatility showdown. vivo wins with a telephoto lens (200 MP on a 1/1.4″ sensor, 85 mm), a 400 mm teleconverter, and a sharper 2K display. OPPO counters with a 200 MP ultra-wide camera, 8K video on every lens, and — if leaks about vivo are confirmed — a larger battery in the European version. Both have the same Dimensity 9600 Pro processor.

    On paper, they are the closest rivals this autumn. Both phones launched in China one day apart, both are called Pro Max, and both target people who buy a smartphone primarily for the camera. However, they differ in their photography approach: vivo focuses on long zoom, while OPPO emphasizes three equal 200 MP cameras.

    We checked the official specifications from both manufacturers, Chinese price lists, vivo’s energy label from the EU EPREL database (via arecenze.cz), and insider posts from @TechHome100. Below you will find a comparison of the cameras module by module, display, battery, and prices, as well as an answer to which model makes sense for you.

    Status as of October 22, 2026: OPPO Find X10 Pro Max is already on sale in Poland (since October 21). vivo X500 Pro Max has its European premiere on October 27 at 4:00 PM, and its Polish premiere the same day at 5:30 PM (both times according to Central European Time, CET). vivo’s data comes from the official Chinese specification. The European version may differ in battery and memory configuration, and there are no official European and Polish prices yet. We will update the article after the premiere.

    vivo X500 Pro Max in orange and OPPO Find X10 Pro Max in Luna White — back of both phones with Zeiss and Hasselblad cameras

    Quick verdict: which model is for whom

    Choose vivo X500 Pro Max if:

    • you photograph from a distance: concerts, sports, nature — the 200 MP periscope has a larger sensor and longer focal length (85 mm vs 70 mm),
    • you are considering a teleconverter — vivo supports two Zeiss lenses, including 400 mm, while OPPO has one, around 230 mm,
    • you care about a sharper screen: 2K and 507 ppi vs 1.5K and 450 ppi in OPPO,
    • you record in slow motion — vivo captures natively 4K at 240 fps.

    Choose OPPO Find X10 Pro Max if:

    • you often photograph with an ultra-wide angle or up close — you get 200 MP on a 1/1.56″ sensor instead of 50 MP on a 1/2.75″ and macro from 4 cm,
    • you record a lot of video — 8K and 4K 120 fps with Dolby Vision work on all three rear cameras, there’s also Open Gate,
    • you want to be sure about the battery in the European version — OPPO officially states 7150 mAh, while vivo has not yet confirmed its capacity,
    • you want to buy a phone right away and know the price — in Poland OPPO costs 6999 PLN, in Germany and France €1799.

    We gathered earlier information about the vivo series, from before the Chinese premiere, in our September article on the specifications, colors, and premiere of the vivo X500 Pro Max. If you’ve already made your choice, you will find tempered glass and screen protector films in our vivo X500 Pro Max and OPPO Find X10 Pro Max categories.

    Specifications of vivo X500 Pro Max vs OPPO Find X10 Pro Max — table

    For OPPO, we provide the European version, for vivo — the Chinese version, as only it has an official specification today. Where the European version of vivo may differ, we state it clearly.

    Parameter vivo X500 Pro Max OPPO Find X10 Pro Max
    Premiere China 21.09.2026, Europe and Poland 27.10.2026 China 22.09.2026, Europe and Poland 21.10.2026
    Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro, 2 nm, up to 4.55 GHz MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro, 2 nm, up to 4.55 GHz
    Screen 6.85″, flat AMOLED, 2K 3168×1440, 507 ppi 6.78″, flat AMOLED, 2772×1272, 450 ppi
    Refresh Rate LTPO 1–144 Hz (144 Hz in games) 1–120 Hz, 144 Hz in selected games
    Brightness (according to the manufacturer) 4400 nits peak (20% of the screen), 2000 nits across the entire screen HBM 2000 nits
    RAM and Storage China: 12 or 16 GB, 256 GB–1 TB; Europe: to be confirmed Europe: 12 GB + 512 GB (only variant)
    Rear Cameras 50 MP + 200 MP periscope 3.5× + 50 MP three 200 MP cameras + color camera 3.2 MP
    Front Camera 50 MP, f/2.0, AF 50 MP, f/2.0, AF
    Battery China: 8000 mAh (typical); Europe: unconfirmed Europe: 7150 mAh (typical; in China 8000 mAh)
    Wired Charging 90 W (Chinese version) 80 W SUPERVOOC / 80 W UFCS
    Wireless Charging 40 W (Chinese version) 50 W AIRVOOC
    Dimensions 163.32 × 76.82 × 7.95 mm (black) / 8.12 mm 161.32 × 76.57 × 8.40 mm
    Weight 225 g (black) / 229 g 226 g (Luna White) / 228 g (Titanium Grey)
    Ingress protection IP68, IP69 IP66, IP68, IP69
    System OriginOS 7 (Android 17) in China ColorOS 17 (Android 17)
    Connectivity Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, eSIM, USB 3.2, infrared Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.2, eSIM, USB 3.2 Gen 1, infrared
    Colors China: gray, white, orange, black; Europe: to be confirmed Europe: Luna White, Titanium Grey
    Price in China (12/256 GB) 6999 ¥ 6799 ¥
    Price in Germany (12/512 GB) unofficially €1799 (leak) €1799
    Price in Poland approx. 7000 PLN (expected, officially 27.10.2026) 6999 PLN

    Interesting fact: both phones use the same processor. Therefore, performance differences will arise from cooling and software, not from the chip itself.

    Camera: vivo X500 Pro Max vs OPPO Find X10 Pro Max — module by module

    This is the most important part of the comparison. The manufacturers have emphasized almost the opposite: vivo invested in a telephoto lens, while OPPO improved the ultra-wide angle to match the other cameras.

    Module vivo X500 Pro Max OPPO Find X10 Pro Max
    Main 50 MP, 1/1.28″, f/1.57, 24 mm, OIS with 3° tilt, CIPA 7.0, Sony LYTIA L910 with LOFIC¹ 200 MP, 1/1.3″, f/1.5, 24 mm, OIS (CIPA 6.5¹), Samsung ISOCELL HPC with DeepPix¹
    Telephoto (periscope) 200 MP, 1/1.4″, f/2.67, 85 mm (3.5×), OIS, CIPA 7.0, macro from 15 cm, Samsung ISOCELL HP0 200 MP, 1/1.56″, f/2.1, 70 mm (3×), OIS (CIPA 7.5¹), macro from 10 cm, Samsung ISOCELL HP5¹
    Ultrawide 50 MP, 1/2.75″, f/2.0, AF, Samsung ISOCELL JN5¹ 200 MP, 1/1.56″, f/2.2, 13 mm (124°), AF, macro from 4 cm, Samsung ISOCELL HP5¹
    Color camera none (there is a multispectral sensor) 3.2 MP, 24 spectral channels
    Focus assist multizone laser, 1536 points laser focus sensor (OPPO does not provide the number of points)
    Front 50 MP, f/2.0, AF, Samsung ISOCELL JN1¹ 50 MP, f/2.0, 18 mm, AF, Samsung ISOCELL JN5¹
    Zoom 3.5× optical, digitally up to 100× 3× optical, 6× lossless according to OPPO
    Teleconverters Zeiss 200 mm and Zeiss 400 mm Hasselblad, approx. 230 mm
    Optics Zeiss, T* coatings Hasselblad

    ¹ The manufacturers do not list these sensor models and values in their specifications. vivo refers to the “Blueprint Light Control 900” sensor, co-defined with Sony, while OPPO refers to “DeepPix technology.” We give them according to @TechHome100 and reviews of the Find X10 Pro Max (Digital Camera World, HardwareZone). The model of vivo’s telephoto sensor (Samsung ISOCELL HP0) is confirmed by the manufacturer itself.

    Main camera: LOFIC vs DeepPix

    The sensors are almost the same size: 1/1.28″ in vivo and 1/1.3″ in OPPO. They differ in resolution (50 MP vs 200 MP) and how they handle large brightness differences in the frame.

    vivo relies on LOFIC, which is an additional capacitor at each pixel that captures excess charge before the bright areas of the image get blown out. According to @TechHome100, the Sony LYTIA L910 sensor has dual-channel LOFIC, a pixel full-well capacity of up to 250,000 electrons, and a record low read noise (0.75 e-). This is meant to eliminate the typical weaknesses of LOFIC: noise and higher power consumption.

    OPPO chose DeepPix: instead of adding a capacitor, it deepens the photodiode itself. We described how this technology works in detail in our OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra comparison. According to the same insider, the HPC sensor has a pixel full-well capacity of about 160,000 electrons.

    Both manufacturers declare 17 EV dynamic range, but under different conditions. vivo provides this value for the vivo Log mode, while OPPO does so for standard video at 1× zoom. The numbers look identical, but they cannot be directly compared.

    Note: pixel capacity and read noise data come from an insider, not from an independent test. Neither phone has a score in DXOMARK yet — the lab has only announced upcoming tests of both models.

    Stabilization works in vivo’s favor. The optical image stabilization (OIS) module of the main camera tilts by 3°, and the manufacturer claims a CIPA level of 7.0. According to the insider, this is twice the range of the previous generation.

    Telephoto: 3.5× and 1/1.4″ vs 3× and 1/1.56″

    This is the heart of vivo. The periscope has 200 MP on a 1/1.4″ sensor, which is about one quarter larger than the 1/1.56″ in OPPO. The focal length of 85 mm (3.5×) is a classic portrait length and a better starting point for long zoom than 70 mm.

    OPPO, on the other hand, has a brighter aperture: f/2.1 vs f/2.67. On paper, this partially balances the difference in sensor size. It also features telemacro from 10 cm instead of 15 cm and lossless 6× zoom (140 mm) according to OPPO.

    vivo adds features for sports and concerts: burst photos with zoom up to 30× with an assistant that keeps the subject in the center of the frame, and a refreshed stage mode. Subject tracking in the 10–30× range will arrive with a software update.

    Ultrawide angle: here OPPO clearly wins

    In OPPO, the ultra-wide camera has 200 MP on a 1/1.56″ sensor, while in vivo — 50 MP on a 1/2.75″ sensor. The OPPO sensor has about three times the surface area, which usually means cleaner landscape and indoor photos after dark.

    OPPO also offers macro from 4 cm with autofocus and a focal length of 13 mm. vivo does not specify the focal length of its ultra-wide camera. If you are photographing architecture and interiors or taking close-up group photos, this difference will be noticeable on a daily basis.

    Teleconverters: 400 mm vs 230 mm

    Both phones support attachable lenses, but vivo has a clear advantage in range.

    vivo X500 Pro Max OPPO Find X10 Pro Max
    Lenses Zeiss Teleconverter G2 and G2 Ultra Hasselblad Teleconverter 3.28×
    On which camera periscope 85 mm periscope 70 mm
    Focal length approx. 200 mm (G2) and approx. 400 mm (G2 Ultra) approx. 230 mm (10×), then 20× and 40× with AI
    Construction G2: 153 g, 96 mm length; G2 Ultra: according to vivo, in combination with X500 Pro Max meets APO standard no data from OPPO
    Accessories grip with buttons, case, external preview screen (sold separately) case with mounting plate, strap, carrying case, tripod mount
    Price in China sold separately; in Europe to be confirmed in Poland 1499 PLN for the set

    vivo directly advertises the set with a 400 mm lens as equipment for concerts. @TechHome100 gives similar advice: if you often go to concerts, choose the X500 Pro Max with the 400 mm teleconverter. TechRadar writes after testing that no OPPO, Honor, or Apple phone can match this lens.

    The OPPO teleconverter only works in its own camera mode: without Master, night, long exposure, slow motion, and Pro Video modes. vivo has not yet published a list of limitations for its lenses. For both brands, keep in mind that the teleconverter is mounted via the case included in the kit — a regular case does not work with it.

    To be confirmed on 27.10: according to a leak from Roland Quandt, a camera kit with the X500 Pro Max will appear in Europe for €1999. It is still unknown whether vivo teleconverters will be sold separately in Poland.

    Video: slow motion in vivo, versatility in OPPO

    For video, both phones are very strong, but each excels in something different.

    Feature vivo X500 Pro Max OPPO Find X10 Pro Max
    Maximum resolution 8K 8K 30 fps on all three rear cameras
    4K 120 fps 10-bit Log, focus tracking of people and objects Dolby Vision at every optical focal length
    Slow motion 4K 240 fps natively, 4K 960 fps with interpolation (with update) 4K 120, 1080p 240, 720p 240 fps
    Log and color vivo Log, 3D LUT, ACES² O-Log2, ACES, custom 3D LUTs
    Open Gate (4:3 from the entire sensor) no information ✅ 4096×3072, up to 60 fps
    Portrait video 4K 60 fps; 4K 30 fps with Dolby Vision and beautification Hasselblad portraits at three focal lengths
    Audio four microphones —
    External apps — Blackmagic Camera from November 2026

    ² According to @TechHome100; vivo also records material in the APV 10-bit 4:2:2 codec.

    vivo wins with slow motion: 4K at 240 fps is a rarity in a phone, and with the update, there will be a 960 fps effect, calculated by an algorithm. Additionally, there is focus tracking in 4K at 120 fps and laser autofocus with over a thousand points.

    OPPO wins with consistency: 8K, 4K at 120 fps with Dolby Vision, and 10-bit Log work on every camera. Open Gate allows you to record a 4:3 frame from the entire sensor and then crop it into a vertical frame for Reels and horizontal for YouTube.

    Zeiss or Hasselblad: colors and modes

    vivo has been collaborating with Zeiss for years. The X500 Pro Max features T* coatings on the lenses, new cinematic styles (including “Paris Afterglow,” “Sunny Day,” and the cool “Silver Halide”), and a “Film” mode that instantly gives recordings a cinematic look. There is also a documentary mode with flat, “gray” image recording and LUT import.

    OPPO works with Hasselblad. The Find X10 Pro Max has the LUMO True Image Engine, 18 LUMO Color Palette color styles, XPAN format, and Master mode. An additional color camera with 24 spectral channels helps to reproduce colors accurately when multiple light sources mix in the frame.

    Color is a matter of taste, and independent tests of both phones in the same scenes are not yet available. Before you choose, compare sample photos from both models.

    Screen, performance, and software

    Screen: 2K in vivo, 1.5K in OPPO

    vivo has a clearly sharper panel: 6.85″, 3168×1440 and 507 ppi. According to vivo, this is the first phone with a BOE Q11 panel in 2K resolution. OPPO has a 6.78″ panel with 2772×1272, which gives 450 ppi. According to @TechHome100, OPPO uses the Tianma N1 panel.

    vivo also claims a much higher peak brightness: 4400 nits at 20% screen area and 2000 nits across the entire screen. OPPO states 2000 nits in high brightness mode. Both screens are flat and go down to 1 nit.

    OPPO, however, has higher frequency PWM dimming: 3840 Hz compared to 2160 Hz in vivo (according to @TechHome100). If screen flicker at low brightness bothers you, this is an argument in favor of OPPO. Both phones refresh the image adaptively, and 144 Hz works in selected games.

    Performance: the same processor

    Both models have MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro in a 2 nm process, with two cores at 4.55 GHz and Mali-G2-Ultra graphics. vivo adds its own image processing chips (according to @TechHome100 VS1 and V3+), while OPPO processes photos directly in the processor.

    In China, vivo has LPDDR5X Ultra memory and UFS 4.1, in variants up to 16 GB RAM and 1 TB. The European OPPO is only available in the 12/512 GB version. The configurations of vivo for Europe will be revealed at the premiere.

    Software

    Both phones launch with Android 17. vivo has the OriginOS 7 overlay in China, while OPPO has ColorOS 17. vivo will confirm on October 27 which software the European X500 Pro Max will get.

    Battery and Charging

    Battery: beware of the European version of vivo

    This is the most common trap when reading Chinese specifications. In China, both phones have 8000 mAh, but in Europe, OPPO officially dropped to 7150 mAh. A similar cut is likely awaiting vivo, but the manufacturer has not yet provided the numbers.

    Source vivo X500 Pro Max OPPO Find X10 Pro Max
    Officially, China 8000 mAh typical / 7800 mAh nominal 8000 mAh typical / 7790 mAh nominal
    Officially, Europe no data until 27.10 7150 mAh typical / 6960 mAh nominal
    EU EPREL database (according to arecenze.cz) 6570 mAh nominal —
    @TechHome100 (16.10.2026) approx. 6750 mAh outside of China —

    Where does the confusion come from? On October 21, @TechHome100 wrote about a battery of 7800 mAh. This is the nominal value of the Chinese version — exactly as vivo states on its Chinese website — and not the European one. According to Notebookcheck, which cites an offer from a store in Hong Kong, a similar capacity is found in the global version sold in Asia. However, Europe will most likely get a model with a smaller cell, as the EPREL label indicates.

    If the leaks are confirmed, the European OPPO will have about 400 mAh more than vivo. The EPREL label for vivo indicates 72 hours of operation on a single cycle in the EU test, but we do not have the same value for OPPO for comparison.

    Charging: 90 W vs 80 W, the reverse for wireless

    The Chinese version of vivo charges with a power of up to 90 W wired and 40 W wirelessly (with a 50 W vivo charger). OPPO has 80 W SUPERVOOC or UFCS and 50 W wirelessly. The charging power of the European vivo will be known after the premiere.

    Neither of the phones has built-in magnets — the lack of Qi2 magnets in OPPO is confirmed by Digital Camera World, and the vivo preview screen requires a magnetic case. Therefore, you need a case with a magnetic ring for magnetic wireless chargers.

    Tip: look for a charger with USB Power Delivery and PPS with a power of at least 60 W. You can choose it from smartphone wall chargers. Only official vivo and OPPO chargers provide the full power stated by the manufacturer.

    Dimensions, casing, and colors

    vivo is thinner: 7.95 mm in the black version and 8.12 mm in the others, compared to 8.40 mm in OPPO. The weight is practically the same: 225–229 g in vivo (Chinese version) and 226–228 g in the European OPPO. However, vivo is 2 mm taller.

    Both have IP68 and IP69 resistance, meaning they can withstand immersion and a stream of hot water. OPPO additionally has IP66. vivo features a 3D ultrasonic fingerprint reader, an aluminum frame, and a glass back (in three colors).

    In China, the vivo X500 Pro Max comes in four colors: gray “Earth Echo”, white “Clear Day”, orange “Aurora Glow”, and black “Capture the Night”. The base X500 got a pink “Dawn” instead of orange. Which colors will make it to Europe will be confirmed by vivo on October 27. Roland Quandt’s leak mentions black and gray.

    The OPPO Find X10 Pro Max in Europe is available in two colors: Luna White and Titanium Grey.

    Prices of vivo X500 Pro Max and OPPO Find X10 Pro Max

    China: vivo slightly more expensive

    This is the only market where we know the official prices of both phones:

    Variant (China) vivo X500 Pro Max OPPO Find X10 Pro Max
    12/256 GB 6999 ¥ 6799 ¥
    12/512 GB 7999 ¥ 7499 ¥
    16/512 GB 8499 ¥ 7999 ¥
    12 GB / 1 TB 8999 ¥ (with satellite connectivity) —
    16 GB / 1 TB 9499 ¥ (with satellite connectivity) 8999 ¥
    Creator’s kit 12 999 ¥ (16 GB / 1 TB with accessories) —

    In China, vivo is more expensive by 200–500 yuan in comparable variants. Both vivo versions with 1 TB have satellite connectivity, which works only in China.

    Europe: OPPO officially, vivo from a leak

    The OPPO Find X10 Pro Max costs €1799 in the OPPO store in Germany and France and £1499 in the United Kingdom (12/512 GB).

    There is no official price for vivo yet. According to a leak from Roland Quandt, the X500 Pro Max in the 12/512 GB version will cost €1799 in Europe, and the camera kit will be €1999. If confirmed, both phones will cost the same in the euro zone.

    Poland: OPPO 6999 PLN, vivo around 7000 PLN

    In the Polish store, OPPO Find X10 Pro Max costs 6999 PLN, and the kit with the Hasselblad teleconverter — 1499 PLN separately or 7699 PLN together with the phone.

    The vivo X500 Pro Max is expected to cost around 7000 PLN in Poland, which is practically the same as OPPO. The official price will be announced by the manufacturer at the premiere on October 27 at 5:30 PM. According to vivo’s European store, sales in Europe will start on November 5. We will update the price here right after the premiere.

    Screen and camera protection for both models

    Both phones have large, protruding camera islands and different dimensions, so each needs its own accessories. A screen protector for the vivo will not cover the OPPO’s display, and the camera protector of one does not fit the other.

    For vivo X500 Pro Max, we already have tempered and hybrid glass, screen protector films and camera lens glass. The other models in the series are collected in the vivo X500 Series category.

    [hs_products category=”2673″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Protection for vivo X500 Pro Max”]

    For OPPO Find X10 Pro Max, you will find tempered and hybrid glass, screen and back protector films, and camera lens glass:

    [hs_products category=”2669″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Protection for OPPO Find X10 Pro Max”]

    Note: teleconverters of both brands are mounted through the case from the photography kit. A regular case will serve you daily, but for photos with the teleconverter, you move the phone into the manufacturer’s case.

    vivo X500 Pro Max or OPPO Find X10 Pro Max — which one to buy?

    The answer depends on how far away you shoot and whether you want to wait.

    Do you go to concerts, matches, or photograph nature? vivo X500 Pro Max. A larger periscope sensor, a focal length of 85 mm, and the 400 mm teleconverter give the longest reach in this class today. OPPO reaches about 230 mm with a teleconverter.

    Do you photograph a bit of everything and record a lot? OPPO Find X10 Pro Max. Three 200 MP cameras provide consistent quality at every focal length, and 8K and Dolby Vision work on each of them. Additionally, there is Open Gate. The ultra-wide angle is clearly better than in vivo.

    Is the screen important? vivo. 2K, 507 ppi, and 4400 nits make for a sharper and brighter panel. Exception: if you are sensitive to flickering, OPPO has PWM dimming at a higher frequency.

    Is the battery important? For now, OPPO, because its European 7150 mAh is confirmed. If the leaks of around 6750 mAh for the European vivo prove true, OPPO will maintain its advantage.

    Do you want to buy now? In Poland, OPPO has been on sale since October 21 for 6999 PLN. vivo is expected to cost similarly, around 7000 PLN; the official price will be revealed on October 27, and sales in Europe are set to start on November 5. If you are hesitating between them, it’s worth waiting a week for the vivo premiere.

    We cover camera phones of this class in more detail in our ranking of the best camera phones of 2026. A year ago, the same competition looked different — see the comparison of OPPO Find X9 Pro vs vivo X300 Pro. According to @TechHome100, it is the X300 Pro that is the direct predecessor of the X500 Pro Max.

    Summary

    vivo X500 Pro Max vs OPPO Find X10 Pro Max is a choice between a zoom specialist and a versatile photographic flagship:

    • vivo X500 Pro Max — 200 MP periscope 1/1.4″ with a focal length of 85 mm, Zeiss 400 mm teleconverter, 2K screen 507 ppi and 4400 nits, slow motion 4K 240 fps, thinner body,
    • OPPO Find X10 Pro Max — three 200 MP cameras, 1/1.56″ ultra-wide angle with macro from 4 cm, 8K and Dolby Vision on every lens, Open Gate, 50 W wireless charging,
    • shared — Dimensity 9600 Pro, Android 17, IP68 and IP69, no DXOMARK score,
    • battery in Europe — OPPO 7150 mAh officially, vivo unofficially around 6750 mAh,
    • price — OPPO 6999 PLN in Poland and €1799 in Germany; vivo according to leaks €1799, in Poland around 7000 PLN (officially October 27).

    Regardless of your choice, make sure to protect it from day one, as repairing the screen or camera island on a flagship of this class will not be cheap. Accessories for both brands can be found in the categories of vivo and OPPO at Home Screen.

    FAQ — vivo X500 Pro Max vs OPPO Find X10 Pro Max

    Which has a better camera: vivo X500 Pro Max or OPPO Find X10 Pro Max?

    For zoom and distant shots, the vivo X500 Pro Max is better with its 200 MP periscope 1/1.4″ and 400 mm teleconverter. For ultra-wide angle, macro, and video at all focal lengths, the OPPO Find X10 Pro Max is superior. Neither has a DXOMARK score yet.

    When is the vivo X500 Pro Max premiere in Poland?

    October 27, 2026, at 17:30 Polish time (CET). The European premiere will take place the same day at 16:00 CET, and sales according to the European vivo store will start on November 5. The phone debuted in China on September 21, 2026.

    How much does the vivo X500 Pro Max cost?

    In China, it starts at 6999 yuan for the 12/256 GB version. In Poland, it is expected to cost around 7000 PLN, and according to a leak from Roland Quandt, in Europe, it will be €1799 for the 12/512 GB version. Official prices will be announced by vivo on October 27 (as of 22.10.2026).

    How much does the OPPO Find X10 Pro Max cost?

    In the Polish OPPO store, it is 6999 PLN, in Germany and France €1799, in the UK £1499 — for the only European version 12/512 GB (as of 22.10.2026).

    What battery does the vivo X500 Pro Max have in Europe?

    vivo has not released this information yet. The Chinese version has 8000 mAh (7800 mAh nominal), and according to leaks, the European version will have around 6750 mAh; the EU database EPREL lists 6570 mAh nominal. The OPPO Find X10 Pro Max officially has 7150 mAh in Europe.

    Do the vivo X500 Pro Max and OPPO Find X10 Pro Max have the same processor?

    Yes. Both use the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro on a 2 nm process. vivo adds its own chips for photo and video processing.

    Does the case for the OPPO Find X10 Pro Max fit the vivo X500 Pro Max?

    No. The phones differ in dimensions, thickness, and the shape of the camera island: vivo has a round island in the center, while OPPO has a rectangular one in the corner. Each requires a dedicated case and screen protector.


    Sources: vivo — X500 Pro Max page (China), vivo — X500 Pro Max specifications (China), OPPO — Find X10 Pro Max specifications, Tech-ish — vivo X500 Pro and Pro Max launch in Europe, Notebookcheck — prices and colors of X500 Pro Max in Europe (leak), arecenze.cz — EPREL label for vivo X500 Pro Max, TechRadar — 400 mm teleconverter test, DXOMARK — vivo X500 Pro Max, @TechHome100 — LYTIA L910 sensor and LOFIC, @TechHome100 — battery in Europe

  • OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra — which one to choose?

    OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra — which one to choose?

    OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra is a contest of video versus zoom. Pro Max wins in video, ultra-wide angle, newer processor, and lower weight, while Find X9 Ultra excels in zoom, larger main sensor, QHD+ screen, and faster charging. In Germany and France, the newer Pro Max costs €1799 compared to €1699 for the X9 Ultra. In the Polish OPPO store, it’s the opposite: 6999 zł compared to 7399 zł.

    This is an unusual situation. The newer phone is more expensive in the euro zone than the flagship from half a year ago, even though in some areas the camera takes a step back — primarily it lacks a 10× periscope, which was the hallmark of the Ultra.

    We checked the official specifications from OPPO, price lists from four countries, reviews, and insider posts from @TechHome100. Below you will find a complete comparison of OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra: the camera module by module, the screen, battery, prices and an answer to which model makes sense for you.

    Status as of October 21, 2026: this is the day of the European and Polish launch of the Find X10 Pro Max. The technical data comes from the official OPPO specifications. The sensor models that OPPO does not provide are described according to reviews and @TechHome100. Pro Max does not yet have a DXOMARK score, and prices in stores will vary.

    OPPO Find X10 Pro Max in Luna White and OPPO Find X9 Ultra in Tundra Umber — back of both phones with Hasselblad cameras

    Short verdict: which model for whom

    Choose Find X10 Pro Max if:

    • you record a lot of video — 8K and 4K 120 fps with Dolby Vision work on each of the three rear cameras, there’s also Open Gate and 10-bit Log,
    • you often photograph with an ultra-wide angle or up close — you get 200 MP instead of 50 MP and focus from just 4 cm,
    • you want a lighter and slimmer phone with Wi-Fi 7 and Android 17 from day one,
    • you are buying in Poland at the OPPO price — here Pro Max is 400 PLN cheaper.

    Choose Find X9 Ultra if:

    • you photograph from a distance: concerts, sports, nature, architectural details — native 230 mm without attaching anything,
    • you care about the largest main sensor (1/1.12″) and a physical camera button,
    • you value a sharper QHD+ screen and 100 W charging,
    • you want a camera proven in independent testing — X9 Ultra has 170 points in DXOMARK, Pro Max is still awaiting testing.

    Pro Max is not a successor to Ultra, but a different concept for a photographic flagship. We wrote about the launch of the new model in September in an article about the specifications and launch of OPPO Find X10 Pro Max. If you have already made your choice, you will find tempered glass and protective films in the categories OPPO Find X10 Pro Max and OPPO Find X9 Ultra.

    OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra specifications — table

    We are comparing the European versions. Where the Chinese version differs, we state it explicitly.

    Parameter Find X10 Pro Max Find X9 Ultra
    Launch China 22.09.2026, Europe and Poland 21.10.2026 China and worldwide 21.04.2026, Poland (pre-order) 29.04.2026
    Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro, 2 nm, up to 4.55 GHz Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 3 nm, up to 4.608 GHz
    Screen 6.78″, flat AMOLED, 2772×1272, 450 ppi 6.82″, AMOLED QHD+ 3168×1440, 510 ppi
    Refresh Rate 1–120 Hz, 144 Hz in selected games 1–120 Hz, 144 Hz in selected games
    Brightness (according to OPPO) HBM 2000 nits HBM 1800 nits, peak 3600 nits
    RAM and storage (EU) 12 GB LPDDR5X + 512 GB UFS 4.1 12 GB LPDDR5X + 512 GB UFS 4.1
    Rear Cameras 3× 200 MP + 3.2 MP color camera 200 + 200 + 50 + 50 MP + 3.2 MP color camera
    10× periscope ❌ ✅ 230 mm
    Front Camera 50 MP, AF 50 MP, AF
    Battery (EU) 7150 mAh (in China 8000 mAh) 7050 mAh
    Wired Charging 80 W SUPERVOOC / 80 W UFCS 100 W SUPERVOOC
    Wireless Charging 50 W AIRVOOC 50 W AIRVOOC
    Dimensions 161.32 × 76.57 × 8.40 mm 163.16 × 76.97 × 8.65 mm (black: 9.10 mm)
    Weight (EU) 226 g (white) / 228 g (titanium) 235 g (orange) / 236 g (black)
    Water and dust resistance IP66, IP68, IP69 IP66, IP68, IP69
    System ColorOS 17 (Android 17) ColorOS 16 (Android 16)
    Connectivity Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.2, eSIM Wi-Fi 6 according to Polish OPPO specifications, Bluetooth 6.0
    Camera Button ❌ (there is a programmable Snap Key) ✅ (and Snap Key)
    Colors in EU Luna White, Titanium Grey Tundra Umber (eco-leather), Canyon Orange
    OPPO Price in Germany 1799 € 1699 €
    OPPO Price in Poland 6999 zł 7399 zł

    Both phones in Europe are available only in one configuration of 12/512 GB. The 16 GB and 1 TB variants are exclusively Chinese. In both cases, the European label shows only IP68 — this is a result of EU labeling regulations, not a weaker build.

    OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra cameras — module by module

    This is the most important part of the comparison, as both phones are primarily purchased for their cameras. They differ in philosophy, not just in numbers.

    Find X9 Ultra has four cameras for photos, which optically cover the range of 14–230 mm. OPPO talks about “eight professional lenses” from 0.6× to 20×. Find X10 Pro Max has three cameras with the same resolution of 200 MP, covering 13–70 mm. Beyond that it relies on a sensor crop, and further still — on a screw-on teleconverter.

    Module Find X10 Pro Max Find X9 Ultra
    Main 200 MP, 1/1.3″, f/1.5, 24 mm, OIS (CIPA 6.5*), Samsung ISOCELL HPC with DeepPix* 200 MP, 1/1.12″, f/1.5, 23 mm, OIS, Sony LYT-901*
    Ultrawide 200 MP, 1/1.56″, f/2.2, 13 mm (124°), AF, macro from 4 cm, no OIS, Samsung ISOCELL HP5* 50 MP, 1/1.95″, f/2.0, 14 mm (123°), AF, no OIS, Sony LYT-600*
    Telephoto 3× (periscope) 200 MP, 1/1.56″, f/2.1, 70 mm, OIS (CIPA 7.5*), macro from 10 cm, Samsung ISOCELL HP5* 200 MP, 1/1.28″, f/2.2, 70 mm, OIS, macro from 15 cm, OmniVision OV52A*
    Telephoto 10× (periscope) ❌ 50 MP, 1/2.75″, f/3.5, 230 mm, OIS + sensor shift, Samsung ISOCELL JNL*
    Color Camera (True Color) 3.2 MP, f/2.4, 24 spectral channels, 15 EV 3.2 MP, f/2.4, 24 spectral channels, 15 EV
    Front 50 MP, 1/2.75″, f/2.0, 18 mm, AF 50 MP, 1/2.75″, f/2.4, 21 mm, AF
    200 MP Photos at 13, 24 and 70 mm at 23 and 70 mm
    Lossless Range up to 140 mm (6×, lossless according to OPPO) up to 460 mm (20×, “optical quality” according to OPPO)
    Video Zoom 3× optical, up to 18× digital 10× optical, up to 30× digital

    * The sensor models and CIPA values are not from OPPO, which only mentions “DeepPix technology” and “new Sony sensor”. We provide them according to reviews (Digital Camera World, HardwareZone) and @TechHome100.

    Main camera: DeepPix 1/1.3″ vs 1/1.12″

    On paper, this is the first loss for the Pro Max. The 1/1.12″ sensor in the X9 Ultra has approximately one-third larger surface area than the 1/1.3″ in the X10 Pro Max. A larger sensor captures more light, which usually results in clearer night photos and a more natural depth of field.

    OPPO counters with the DeepPix technology. The manufacturer claims a dynamic range of up to 17 EV for the main camera in video, and the Chinese press reports a 60% larger pixel capacity than in the previous generation. There is one caveat in OPPO’s footnote: this 17 EV only works at 1× in standard video mode, not in 4K 120 fps or 8K.

    Both designs have an aperture of f/1.5 and optical stabilization. The X10 Pro Max has a focal length of 24 mm, while the X9 Ultra has 23 mm. According to @TechHome100, the X9 Ultra in Hasselblad Master mode achieves up to 16 EV of dynamic range in photos.

    DeepPix or LOFIC — what exactly does the new sensor do

    To understand DeepPix, one must know how a pixel converts light into an image. Light enters through the lens to the photodiode, which accumulates charge. Then, the charge passes through a transfer gate to the so-called readout node, where it is converted into voltage. Thus, the pixel does three things: it collects, transfers, and reads.

    The problem with 200 MP sensors is that the pixels are very small. A small pixel quickly “overflows” in bright light, causing the sky or lights to be blown out. The industry has two ideas to address this.

    LOFIC adds a separate capacitor to each pixel, which captures excess charge. It works, but according to @TechHome100, it comes at a cost:

    • the signal from the capacitor is more noisy,
    • the sensor has to read the image twice (weak and strong signal), so it requires more circuits,
    • power consumption and frame read time increase, which limits the number of frames per second,
    • production is more complicated and expensive.

    DeepPix takes a different approach. Instead of adding a tank beside it, it deepens the photodiode itself in silicon — it’s like a vessel with the same opening but a deeper interior. Additionally, there is a dual vertical transfer gate that moves the entire charge, and a larger, shared read node.

    According to @TechHome100, the result is lower read noise, reduced power consumption, and cheaper production compared to LOFIC. The Find X10 Pro Max is the first phone with a Samsung ISOCELL HPC sensor built using this technology. According to the same insider, the X9 Ultra’s sensor does not use LOFIC — Ultra relies on the size of the sensor and multi-frame HDR.

    Note: this is an explanation of the construction, not a test result. Whether DeepPix on a smaller sensor can match the large sensor of the X9 Ultra in difficult lighting will only be shown by independent measurements.

    Ultrawide angle: 200 MP vs 50 MP

    Here, Pro Max clearly wins. Instead of 50 MP on a 1/1.95″ sensor, you get 200 MP on a 1/1.56″ sensor, which is about 50% larger. The focal length is 13 mm (124°) compared to 14 mm (123°) in the Ultra.

    This is the answer to the most common criticism of the X9 Ultra. Digital Camera World pointed out the ultra-wide angle as the weakest camera of the Ultra, and @TechHome100 stated outright that the X9 Ultra is very strong, “except for the ultra-wide.” According to the insider, the new module collects 102% more light than the previous generation.

    There is also macro from 4 cm with autofocus. None of the ultra-wide cameras have optical stabilization, so in low light, you still need to hold the phone securely.

    Telephoto 3×: larger sensor in Ultra, closer macro in Pro Max

    Both phones have a 3× periscope with a focal length of 70 mm and a 200 MP sensor. They differ in details:

    • X9 Ultra has a larger sensor of 1/1.28″ (about 1.5 times larger area) and an aperture of f/2.2,
    • X10 Pro Max has a sensor of 1/1.56″, a brighter aperture of f/2.1, CIPA 7.5-rated stabilization, and telemacro from 10 cm instead of 15 cm.

    In July, @TechHome100 reported that Pro Max would get the same 1/1.28″ telephoto sensor as the Ultra. This leak turned out to be incorrect — the official OPPO specification states 1/1.56″.

    From the 3× telephoto, Pro Max also takes a 6× (140 mm) crop, which OPPO calls lossless. The X9 Ultra at 6× produces 50 MP photos from the same sensor.

    10× Periscope — what the X10 Pro Max simply does not have

    This is the biggest difference in the entire comparison. The X9 Ultra has a second periscope: 50 MP, 1/2.75″, f/3.5, 230 mm, with a prism reflecting light five times and optical stabilization combined with sensor shift. OPPO claims “optical quality” up to 20× (460 mm) and digital zoom up to 120×.

    The Find X10 Pro Max does not have such a module. Above 6×, digital zoom is already in use, and to get to around 230 mm optically, you need to buy a teleconverter. If you photograph concerts from the stands, matches, or birds, this difference will be visible in every photo.

    Color camera and front camera

    Both models have the same type of color sensor: 3.2 MP, f/2.4, 24 spectral channels and 15 EV. This is the second generation of the Danxia lens, which does not take photos but measures light and helps accurately reproduce colors.

    In the Pro Max, OPPO claims a 43% higher sensitivity than in the previous color sensor. The Polish specification for the X9 Ultra calls this module “monochromatic,” but the Chinese version directly refers to it as a lens for color reproduction.

    The front camera has 50 MP and autofocus in both models. The Pro Max has a wider angle (18 mm versus 21 mm) and a brighter aperture f/2.0 versus f/2.4.

    Hasselblad, LUMO, and photographic modes

    Both phones were developed in collaboration with Hasselblad and both have a Master mode and panoramic XPAN format. They differ in processing and additions.

    Find X10 Pro Max:

    • new LUMO True Image Engine (separate color, tone, and detail modules),
    • 18 LUMO Color Palette color styles and LUMO Framing, i.e. AI framing suggestions,
    • Hasselblad portraits at each of the three focal lengths,
    • according to Digital Camera World, gentler sharpening and calmer HDR than in the Ultra.

    Find X9 Ultra:

    • new generation Hasselblad Master mode with RAW MAX and JPG MAX formats,
    • portraits from 1× to 10× with the LUMO True Face algorithm and portrait with flash,
    • nine film presets; according to @TechHome100, these include equivalents of Portra, RDP III slide film, CineStill 800T, and black-and-white TX400, and you can save up to 20 of your own recipes.

    Neither model can save JPG and RAW at the same time — Digital Camera World noted this in both reviews. Neither has a separate image processor like the former MariSilicon either; processing is done by the main chip.

    Teleconverters — two different systems, zero compatibility

    Both phones support a screw-on Hasselblad lens, but they are completely different designs.

    Find X10 Pro Max Find X9 Ultra
    Lens Hasselblad Teleconverter 3.28× Hasselblad 300 mm (Explorer)
    On which camera telephoto lens 3× (70 mm) —
    Focal length approx. 230 mm (10×), further 20× and 40× with AI native 300 mm, up to 690 mm “optical quality”
    Construction no OPPO data 16 lenses in 11 groups, including 4 ED
    Video and stabilization up to 4K 60 fps (according to @TechHome100 also Dolby Vision), OIS + EIS OIS + EIS
    Kit contents lens, magnetic case and mounting plate, strap, carrying case, tripod foot case with grip, two-stage shutter button, zoom lever, 67 mm filter rings
    Kit price in Poland 1499 PLN (phone with kit: 7699 PLN) 1999 PLN (Polish pre-order price)
    Limitations works only in its own mode — not in Master, night, long exposure, slow motion or Pro Video mode does not work in Master mode

    The most important information for Ultra owners: the teleconverter from X9 Ultra does not fit X10 Pro Max. Digital Camera World explains this by a different sensor and a different mounting distance. So if you invested in the Earth Explorer kit, switching to Pro Max means purchasing a new lens.

    Video: 8K, 4K 120 fps, Dolby Vision, Open Gate and Log

    Video is where the Pro Max’s advantage is clearest. The new model offers the same capabilities at every focal length, while the Ultra — mainly at two.

    Function Find X10 Pro Max Find X9 Ultra
    8K 30 fps ✅ all three rear cameras, also 10-bit Log main camera and 3×
    4K 120 fps Dolby Vision ✅ every optical focal length main camera and 3×
    4K 60 fps Dolby Vision ✅ ✅ all cameras, front and back
    Log and color O-Log2, ACES, custom 3D LUTs with file saving O-Log2 10-bit, ACES, LUT import and burning
    Open Gate ✅ 4096×3072 (4:3), up to 60 fps, at 0.5×, 1× and 3× no information in OPPO materials
    HDR in video 17 EV (DeepPix, only 1× in standard mode) high dynamic range, value not provided
    Slow motion 4K 120, 1080p 240, 720p 240 fps 4K 120, 1080p 240, 720p 480 fps
    Stabilization OIS + EIS, horizon leveling up to 5° OIS + EIS
    Blackmagic Camera ✅ from November 2026 —

    Open Gate is recording from the entire sensor area in a 4:3 aspect ratio. From such footage, you can then cut vertical video for Reels and horizontal for YouTube without losing the frame. OPPO notes that in this mode, extended stabilization does not work.

    Pro Max will also support the Blackmagic Camera app with O-Log2, Open Gate, and Dolby Vision, but according to Digital Camera World, only from November 2026. The X9 Ultra, on the other hand, has four microphones and the highest slow-motion frame rate — 480 fps in 720p.

    Camera button: only in Ultra

    X9 Ultra has a dedicated shutter button with an orange accent. Swiping changes the zoom, and a half-press locks focus and exposure. According to Digital Camera World, it does not work in the vertical orientation of the phone.

    The Find X10 Pro Max does not have this button, leaving the programmable Snap Key. If you shoot the way you would with a camera, holding the phone horizontally, this difference will be noticeable.

    DXOMARK: 170 points for X9 Ultra, Pro Max awaits testing

    The Find X9 Ultra received 170 points in DXOMARK (photos 175, video 161, bokeh 185). The test was published on July 28, 2026. At that time, the Ultra ranked third, tied with the vivo X300 Ultra; as of October 21, 2026, it is fourth.

    DXOMARK praises X9 Ultra for detail, noise control, bokeh, and zoom at long distances. Weak points include challenging scenes in low light and HDR, sometimes uncertain autofocus in video, and transitions between cameras. We covered how the Ultra stacks up against vivo in our comparison vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra.

    The Find X10 Pro Max does not have a score yet. The DXOMARK page announces a test, so numerical comparison will only be possible after some time.

    Display, performance, and software

    Display: QHD+ in Ultra, 1.5K in Pro Max

    X9 Ultra has a sharper display: 6.82″ QHD+ 3168×1440 and 510 ppi. Pro Max has 6.78″ and 2772×1272, which OPPO calls “FHD+,” and the press refers to as “1.5K” — resulting in 450 ppi. You will mainly notice the difference in fine text when viewed up close.

    Pro Max features a flat panel with 1.15 mm bezels, 95% coverage of the BT.2020 color space, 10-bit color, and PWM dimming at 3840 Hz below 70 nits. This is good news for those sensitive to flickering. The screen is protected by Crystal Shield Glass, while the Ultra uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2.

    Brightness is a point of caution. OPPO states that the X10 Pro Max has 2000 nits HBM. The peak value of 3600 nits is reported by @TechHome100 and some press, but it is not listed in OPPO’s specifications. For the X9 Ultra, OPPO officially declares 1800 nits HBM and 3600 nits peak.

    Both screens refresh adaptively in the range of 1–120 Hz, and 144 Hz works only in selected games. According to @TechHome100, Pro Max has a Tianma N1 panel, while X9 Ultra has a BOE X3.

    Performance and Memory

    Pro Max is equipped with a MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro built on a 2 nm process, with a clock speed of up to 4.55 GHz and Mali G2-Ultra graphics. X9 Ultra has a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 on a 3 nm process, up to 4.608 GHz, with Adreno 840 graphics.

    A smaller manufacturing process usually favors energy efficiency, but there are currently no independent comparisons of both phones in the same tests. Therefore, we do not declare a winner in performance.

    In Europe, both models have only 12 GB of RAM and 512 GB of storage (LPDDR5X, UFS 4.1), without a memory card. @TechHome100 has already criticized the lack of a global version with 16 GB for the Ultra — this complaint now applies to both phones.

    Software

    Find X10 Pro Max launches with ColorOS 17 on Android 17, while X9 Ultra runs on ColorOS 16 with Android 16. According to @TechHome100, the X9 Ultra entered the beta program for the new ColorOS in August, so an update is on the way.

    Pro Max has Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.2, and eSIM in its specifications. OPPO’s Polish specification for the X9 Ultra lists Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 6.0, although according to @TechHome100, the Chinese and Indian versions of the Ultra support Wi-Fi 7.

    Battery, Charging, and Build

    Battery: watch out for the European version

    This is the main trap when reading foreign reviews. The Chinese Find X10 Pro Max has a battery of 8000 mAh, but the European version has only 7150 mAh (typical; 6960 mAh rated). The X9 Ultra has 7050 mAh in Europe, so the difference is just 100 mAh in favor of the Pro Max.

    If you come across a battery test from China or a mention of “8000 mAh,” remember that it refers to a different version of the phone. Digital Camera World notes that the European Pro Max has a smaller battery than the Find X9 Pro with 7500 mAh.

    Charging: 100 W vs 80 W

    X9 Ultra charges faster: 100 W SUPERVOOC compared to 80 W in Pro Max. Pro Max also supports 80 W in the UFCS standard (with UFCS chargers from other manufacturers — up to 44 W). Both accept 50 W AIRVOOC wirelessly.

    No charger is included in the box. With a regular USB Power Delivery charger with PPS, both phones will draw up to 55 W. With USB PD alone without PPS, it’s much slower: 13.5 W in Pro Max and 18 W in Ultra.

    Tip: look for a charger that supports USB PD and PPS (programmable voltage) with a power of at least 60 W. You can choose it from smartphone wall chargers. Only the OPPO SUPERVOOC charger provides the full 80 or 100 W.

    According to Digital Camera World, Pro Max does not have built-in Qi2 magnets. To use magnetic wireless chargers and mounts, you need a case with a magnetic ring.

    Dimensions, weight, and resistance

    Pro Max is smaller and lighter:

    • 161.32 × 76.57 × 8.40 mm compared to 163.16 × 76.97 × 8.65 mm in Ultra (black version in eco-leather: 9.10 mm),
    • 226–228 g compared to 235–236 g.

    Both phones have IP66, IP68, and IP69 resistance, meaning they can withstand immersion and a stream of hot water under pressure. The differences in dimensions and camera island mean that cases and screen protectors are not interchangeable between models.

    Prices of OPPO Find X10 Pro Max and X9 Ultra in Europe and Poland

    Here lies the most interesting paradox of this comparison. In euros and pounds, the newer Pro Max costs more, in zlotys — less.

    Prices in euros and pounds: Pro Max is more expensive

    Official prices in OPPO stores as of October 21, 2026, for the only European version 12/512 GB:

    Market (OPPO store) Find X10 Pro Max Find X9 Ultra Difference
    Germany 1799 € 1699 € Pro Max is more expensive by 100 €
    France 1799 € 1699.90 € Pro Max is more expensive by 99.10 €
    United Kingdom £1499 £1449 Pro Max is more expensive by £50
    Poland 6999 zł 7399 zł Pro Max is cheaper by 400 zł

    In the euro zone, you pay €100 more for a phone that loses a 10× periscope and the largest main sensor. In return, you get a better ultra-wide angle, much stronger video, and a newer processor. The price of the X9 Ultra in OPPO stores in Germany and the UK has not changed since its launch in April.

    Prices in Poland: the opposite of the euro

    In the Polish OPPO store, the Find X10 Pro Max costs 6999 zł, while the Find X9 Ultra costs 7399 zł.

    However, market prices look different from the manufacturer’s price list. The Find X9 Ultra, after six months on the market, costs in Polish online stores from about 6635 zł (as of 21.10.2026), which is less than the Pro Max in the OPPO price list. There are no offers for the Pro Max from other sellers yet.

    If you are thinking about photography with a teleconverter, count the total. The set for the Pro Max costs 1499 zł, and the phone bundled with it is 7699 zł. The Earth Explorer set for the X9 Ultra was priced at 1999 zł in Polish pre-sale.

    China for context

    In China, the Pro Max is cheaper at every memory level: from 6799 yuan (12/256 GB) compared to 7499 yuan for the X9 Ultra at launch. For 16/1 TB, it is 8999 versus 9299 yuan. In China, the price relationship is therefore the opposite of that in the euro zone and the same as in the Polish OPPO price list.

    Cases, screen protectors and camera protection for both models

    Both phones have different camera islands and dimensions, so each requires its own accessories. The case from the X9 Ultra won’t fit the Pro Max, and the glass from one won’t cover the screen of the other.

    For the Find X10 Pro Max, we already have tempered and hybrid glass, screen and back films, and a camera protector:

    [hs_products category=”2669″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Protection for OPPO Find X10 Pro Max”]

    For the Find X9 Ultra, the selection is broader — from cases to camera glass sets. We discussed selected products in our roundup of the best accessories for OPPO Find X9 Ultra.

    [hs_products category=”2511″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Cases and glass for OPPO Find X9 Ultra”]

    Note: teleconverters for both models are mounted through the case from the Hasselblad set. If you plan to use such a lens, a regular case will serve you daily, but for photos with the teleconverter, you will still need to switch your phone to the original case.

    Find X10 Pro Max or X9 Ultra — which one to buy?

    The answer depends on what you photograph and where you buy.

    Do you have the Find X9 Ultra? Don’t switch to the Pro Max for photos. You will lose the 10× periscope, the larger main sensor, the QHD+ screen, the camera button, and 100 W charging, and your teleconverter will no longer fit. The switch makes sense only if you shoot a lot of video or if the weak ultra-wide angle bothers you.

    Are you buying your first photography flagship and recording video? Find X10 Pro Max. Three 200 MP cameras provide consistent photos and videos at every focal length, and 8K, Open Gate, and Log work everywhere, not just on the main camera. Plus, it’s lighter and has a newer system.

    Do you photograph from a distance? Find X9 Ultra. Native 230 mm without screwing anything on is an argument that Pro Max cannot replace with software. If you buy a teleconverter for Pro Max, you will reach a similar focal length, but with the lens in your pocket and mode limitations.

    Are you counting every penny? In Poland, both scenarios are fair. According to OPPO’s pricing, Pro Max is cheaper (6999 PLN), but the X9 Ultra already costs from about 6635 PLN in retail stores. In the euro zone, X9 Ultra is cheaper — by 100 €.

    Summary

    OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra is a choice between two different takes on the photography flagship:

    • Find X10 Pro Max — three 200 MP cameras, the best video in the history of the series, 200 MP in ultra-wide angle, Dimensity 9600 Pro in 2 nm, 226 g weight, and Android 17,
    • Find X9 Ultra — 10× periscope with native 230 mm, main sensor 1/1.12″, QHD+ display, 100 W charging, camera button, and 170 points in DXOMARK,
    • price — in euros and pounds Pro Max is more expensive (1799 € vs 1699 €), in the Polish OPPO store it is cheaper by 400 PLN, and on the market X9 Ultra can be cheaper than both price lists,
    • battery — in Europe practically a tie: 7150 vs 7050 mAh, as only the Chinese Pro Max got 8000 mAh.

    Regardless of your choice, make sure to protect it from day one, as repairing the screen or camera island on a phone costing around 7,000 PLN won’t be cheap. Accessories for both models and other phones from the brand can be found in the OPPO category at Home Screen.

    FAQ — OPPO Find X10 Pro Max vs X9 Ultra

    Is the OPPO Find X10 Pro Max the successor to the Find X9 Ultra?

    No. Pro Max is a new name in the Find X10 series, with a different camera concept — without a 10× periscope. The Find X10 Ultra has not been announced; according to leaks, it is expected to appear in the first quarter of 2027.

    Which has a better camera: Find X10 Pro Max or X9 Ultra?

    For zoom above 6× and distant shots, the X9 Ultra with a 230 mm periscope and larger main sensor is better. For video, ultra-wide angle, and macro, the Find X10 Pro Max is superior. Pro Max does not yet have a DXOMARK score, while the X9 Ultra has 170 points.

    How much does the OPPO Find X10 Pro Max cost?

    In the OPPO store in Germany and France, it costs €1799, in the UK £1499, and in Poland 6999 PLN for the 12/512 GB version. In China, prices start at 6799 yuan for 12/256 GB (as of 21.10.2026).

    How much does the OPPO Find X9 Ultra cost?

    In the OPPO store in Germany, it costs €1699, in the UK £1449, and in Poland 7399 PLN. In Polish online stores, the X9 Ultra costs from about 6635 PLN (as of 21.10.2026).

    Does the teleconverter from Find X9 Ultra fit the Find X10 Pro Max?

    No. The Pro Max uses a different Hasselblad 3.28× teleconverter, mounted on a 3× telephoto lens. The 300 mm lens from the X9 Ultra kit does not fit due to a different sensor and mounting distance.

    What battery does the Find X10 Pro Max have in Europe?

    The European version has 7150 mAh (typical), which is only 100 mAh more than the X9 Ultra. The 8000 mAh battery is only available in the Chinese version of the phone.

    Does the case for Find X9 Ultra fit the Find X10 Pro Max?

    No. The phones differ in dimensions, thickness, and camera island layout, so each requires a dedicated case and screen protector.


    Sources: OPPO — Find X10 Pro Max specifications, OPPO — Find X9 Ultra specifications, DXOMARK — Find X9 Ultra camera test, Digital Camera World — Find X10 Pro Max review, GSMArena — global launch and prices in Europe, @TechHome100 — DeepPix or LOFIC

  • Huawei Watch GT 7 vs GT 6: what are the differences? [2026]

    Huawei Watch GT 7 vs GT 6: what are the differences? [2026]

    Huawei Watch GT 7 has the same case dimensions, the same screen, the same sensors, and the same battery life in days as the GT 6. The novelties are mainly software-related: an expanded skiing mode with slope maps, ascent planning for cyclists, a new EasyCross strap, and new frame designs around the screen.

    The short answer: it’s usually not worth upgrading from GT 6 to GT 7. The exception is skiers and cyclists who will benefit from the new modes. Note regarding accessories: straps of the same width should fit, but glasses and films from GT 6 do not fit GT 7.

    According to foreign services, Huawei unveiled the GT 7 in China on August 5, 2026, and sales in Europe started on September 2. The watch is already available in the Polish Huawei store. Below is a point-by-point comparison and an answer regarding which accessories from GT 6 can be retained.

    Skier on the slope, Huawei Watch GT 7 with skiing mode

    Skiing modes are the main novelty of the GT 7. Photo: Huawei.

    Versions of Huawei Watch GT 7

    The GT 7 series has the same sizes as the GT 6:

    • GT 7 46 mm: stainless steel case, 1.47-inch screen.
    • GT 7 41 mm: smaller version with a 1.32-inch screen.
    • GT 7 Pro 46 mm: titanium case, sapphire glass, ECG, and breath-hold diving up to 40 m.

    On the left Huawei Watch GT 7, on the right GT 7 Pro. Photos: Huawei.

    In the Polish Huawei store on October 12, GT 7 was priced at a promotional rate starting from 999 PLN, and GT 7 Pro from 1499 PLN. GT 6 can be purchased from Huawei for about 900–950 PLN, and GT 6 Pro for 1399 PLN.

    Huawei Watch GT 7 vs GT 6: differences table

    FeatureGT 6 / GT 6 ProGT 7 / GT 7 Pro
    Dimensions 46 mm46 × 46 × 10.95 mm46 × 46 × 10.95 mm
    Dimensions 41 mm41.3 × 41.3 × 9.99 mm41.3 × 41.3 × 9.99 mm
    Pro Dimensions45.6 × 45.6 × 11.25 mm45.6 × 45.6 × 11.25 mm
    Screen1.47″ or 1.32″, 466 × 466unchanged
    Battery 46 mm and Proup to 21 daysup to 21 days
    Battery 41 mmup to 14 daysup to 14 days
    Water Resistance5 ATM and IP695 ATM and IP69
    ECG and diving up to 40 m✅ in Pro✅ in Pro
    Pro Frametitanium with scaleceramic, raised
    Maps of ski resorts and indoor mode❌✅
    Bicycle ascent planning❌✅
    EasyCross Strap❌✅ in versions with fluoroelastomer strap

    Data according to Huawei specifications (GT 7, GT 7 Pro, GT 6, GT 6 Pro).

    Case, screen, and sensors: unchanged

    Here is the biggest surprise. The case dimensions are identical in all three sizes, to the hundredth of a millimeter. The screens have the same diagonal, resolution of 466 × 466, and brightness of up to 3000 nits.

    The list of sensors is the same, as is the dual-band GPS and 5 ATM with IP69 resistance. Huawei does not announce a new generation of the TruSense heart rate sensor with the GT 7. The Pro versions of both generations have ECG and certification for breath-hold diving up to 40 m.

    The appearance of the bezel around the screen has changed. The GT 7 has a new, clearer bezel design, while the GT 7 Pro has a raised ceramic bezel instead of a titanium one with a scale. This matters for glasses and cases, as discussed below.

    Battery: the same days, different numbers with GPS

    In watch mode, the battery lasts the same: up to 21 days in the 46 mm and Pro versions and up to 14 days in the 41 mm version.

    With GPS on, Huawei reports more hours for the GT 7: 51 instead of 40 in the 46 mm version and 32 instead of 25 in the 41 mm version. However, these numbers come from different tests. The GT 6 was measured in “outdoor sport” mode, while the GT 7 was measured in trail running mode with less frequent screen backlighting. Do not compare them directly.

    New features: skiing, cycling, and health

    The GT 7 differs from the GT 6 primarily in software:

    • Skiing and snowboarding: the skiing mode was already present in the GT 6. New features include indoor mode, turn and overload analysis, and maps of over 3000 ski resorts in 59 countries.
    • Cycling: planning climbs based on routes from the Huawei Health app, warnings about upcoming climbs, and sharp turns.
    • GPS Accuracy: a new algorithm that according to Huawei draws a route in fast winter sports 20% more accurately than the GT 6.
    • Health: fitness readiness indicator, TruSleep 5.0, and new health analysis features.
    • Golf in Pro: distances considering the slope of the terrain. Maps of over 17,000 courses are also available on the GT 6 Pro.

    Cycling and golf features in the GT 7 Pro. Photos: Huawei.

    Some features, including skiing modes and turn alerts, are provided by Huawei in updates. Not all work in every country.

    If you have an iPhone, be aware of the limitations. According to the Huawei store, some GT 7 features, including notifications from messengers and replying to SMS, only work with Android. Similar limitations were present in the GT 6.

    Does the strap from the GT 6 fit the GT 7?

    The width of the straps has not changed. According to Huawei, both generations have:

    Watch sizeStrap width
    46 mm and Pro22 mm
    41 mm18 mm

    A strap from the GT 6 of the same size should therefore fit the GT 7, just like the universal 22 mm and 18 mm straps with a quick-release. However, Huawei does not explicitly describe how the GT 7 strap attaches to the case.

    For the GT 6, it mentioned the EasyFit quick-release system, while for the GT 7 it only describes the new EasyCross clasp. Before purchasing a new strap, remove the current one and check how it is attached.

    Original GT 7 straps with EasyCross clasp. Photos: Huawei.

    In the store, you will find universal 22 mm straps for the 46 mm and Pro versions:

    Bizon Strap Watch Silicone 22 mm.

    Bizon Strap Watch Aura 22 mm.

    The manufacturer does not list GT 6 or GT 7 among the compatible watches. They fit in width, but check the mounting method before purchasing.

    Do the glass and film from GT 6 fit GT 7?

    It’s better to buy new ones. Although the screen has the same size, the frame around it is different, so the manufacturers of the covers have cut the films for GT 7 anew. This is evident from the diameter of the Bizon HydroFlex film:

    ModelFilm for GT 6Film for GT 7
    46 mm3.96 cm3.88 cm
    41 mm3.55 cm3.58 cm
    Pro 46 mm3.96 cm3.76 cm

    The biggest difference is in the Pro version. The film from GT 6 Pro is 2 mm larger, so it may sit on the raised frame of GT 7 Pro and protrude from the screen. 3mk, Bizon, and GrizzGlass have separate covers for GT 7, with different EAN codes.

    Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex for GT 7 46 mm, 6 pieces in the set.

    On the left 3mk FlexibleGlass, on the right GrizzGlass HybridGlass.

    In the store you will find, among others:

    Protectors for the 41 mm version and Pro can be found in the category accessories for Huawei Watch GT 7.

    Does the case from GT 6 fit GT 7?

    The case dimensions are the same, but the frame is different, so the case from GT 6 should not be used interchangeably. Especially in GT 7 Pro, where the frame is raised. Bizon released a separate case for GT 7 Pro, instead of adding this model to the GT 6 Pro case.

    Bizon Case Watch Felipe for GT 7 Pro with screen protector.

    Bizon Case Watch Adamo for GT 7 Pro with glass.

    We do not yet have cases for the regular GT 7 41 and 46 mm in the store. There are two models for the GT 7 Pro:

    [hs_products ids=”149639,142767,148361,148356,146879,146885,99353,101021″ cols=”4″]

    Does the charger from GT 6 charge GT 7?

    Huawei does not confirm this directly. Both models charge wirelessly through a cradle, and the power supply according to Huawei should be 5–10 V and up to 2 A. In the box of each watch, there is its own charger, and the GT 7 Pro comes with a second-generation wireless charger.

    Huawei Watch GT 7 or GT 6: which one to choose?

    Your situationChoose
    You have GT 6, do not ski or bike muchstick with GT 6
    You ski or snowboardGT 7, which has slope maps and indoor mode
    You mountain bikeGT 7 with ascent planning
    You are buying your first watch and do not need new modesGT 6, slightly cheaper with the same case and battery
    You play golf or diveGT 7 Pro or GT 6 Pro, both have ECG, golf, and diving

    GT 7 Pro, like GT 6 Pro, has a diving certification up to 40 m. Photo: Huawei.

    If you are hesitating between watches from different brands, check out our comparison of Garmin Fenix 9 vs Fenix 8 and the ranking of the best running watch.

    Summary: Huawei Watch GT 7 vs GT 6

    • The same case and screen, and the battery lasts the same number of days. The differences are the software and the appearance of the bezel.
    • New features include slope maps, ascent planning, and more accurate GPS for winter sports.
    • 22 mm and 18 mm straps fit in width, but check the mounting.
    • Buy new glasses and films, because those for GT 7 have a different diameter.
    • Do not blindly transfer the case from GT 6 Pro, because GT 7 Pro has a raised bezel.

    FAQ

    What is the difference between Huawei Watch GT 7 and GT 6? The case, screen, sensors, and battery life are the same. GT 7 has an enhanced skiing mode with slope maps, ascent planning for cyclists, a new GPS algorithm, and new bezel designs around the screen. The Pro version received a raised ceramic bezel.

    Is it worth changing from GT 6 to GT 7? For most people, no, because hardware-wise it is the same watch. The change makes sense for skiers and cyclists who will benefit from the new modes.

    Does the strap from GT 6 fit GT 7? The width is the same: 22 mm in the 46 mm and Pro versions and 18 mm in the 41 mm version. However, Huawei does not directly describe the strap mounting in GT 7, so check how to remove the strap on your unit before purchasing.

    Does the glass from GT 6 fit GT 7? It’s better to buy a new one. The frame around the screen is different, and the films for GT 7 have a different diameter than those for GT 6. The biggest difference is in the Pro version, where the film from GT 6 Pro is 2 mm too large.

    Does Huawei Watch GT 7 work with iPhone? Yes, with iOS 13 or newer. Some features, such as replying to SMS and notifications from messengers, only work with Android. GT 6 had similar limitations.

    How much does Huawei Watch GT 7 cost in Poland? In the Huawei store on October 12, 2026, GT 7 was on promotion for 999 PLN, and GT 7 Pro for 1499 PLN.

  • Garmin Fenix 9 vs Fenix 8: differences and whether it’s worth upgrading

    Garmin Fenix 9 vs Fenix 8: differences and whether it’s worth upgrading

    Basic Garmin Fenix 9 has the same case dimensions, the same diagonal and screen resolution, and the same battery life in smartwatch mode as the Fenix 8 AMOLED. It gets a brighter screen, sapphire glass in every version, a titanium bezel, 64 GB of memory, and faster maps. Bigger changes are in the Fenix 9 Pro model: a titanium case, a thinner body than in the Fenix 8 Pro, and a larger screen in the 51 mm version.

    Short answer: it’s usually not worth switching from the Fenix 8 AMOLED to the basic Fenix 9. The QuickFit bands and charger from the Fenix 8 fit the Fenix 9. It’s better to buy new protective glass, and in the Fenix 9 Pro 51 mm, it’s necessary.

    Garmin unveiled the Fenix 9 and Fenix 9 Pro on August 25, 2026. Below, we compare both models point by point and explain which accessories from the Fenix 8 can be kept.

    Runner in the mountains, next to Garmin Fenix 9 and Fenix 9 Pro watches

    Garmin Fenix 9 and Fenix 9 Pro. Photo: Garmin.

    Fenix 9 Versions: Beware of the “Pro” Name

    The Fenix 9 comes in four variants. Watch out for the naming trap.

    • Fenix 9: AMOLED display, sizes 43, 47, and 51 mm.
    • Fenix 9 Pro: brighter AMOLED (up to 3000 nits), titanium case, 43, 47, and 51 mm.
    • Fenix 9 Pro Solar: MIP display with solar charging, 47 and 51 mm.
    • Fenix 9 Pro inReach: with LTE and satellite connectivity, 43, 47, and 51 mm. The inReach Solar version is available in sizes 47 and 51 mm.

    Fenix 9 Pro without the inReach suffix does not have LTE or satellite. In the 8 series, every Fenix 8 Pro had LTE and satellite. If you are upgrading from the Fenix 8 Pro and want to keep satellite messaging, you need the 9 Pro inReach version. The service also requires an active inReach plan.

    Fenix 9 vs Fenix 8: difference table

    Feature Fenix 8 / 8 Pro Fenix 9 / 9 Pro
    Screen Glass Fenix 8: Gorilla Glass or sapphire, depending on the version. 8 Pro: sapphire sapphire in all versions
    Material steel or titanium frame Fenix 9: titanium frame. 9 Pro: titanium case
    AMOLED Brightness standard up to 2× brighter, in Pro up to 3000 nits
    Memory 32 GB 64 GB
    Maps TopoActive maps scrolling up to 30% faster, perspective view
    51 mm Screen 1.4″, 454 × 454 Fenix 9: 1.4″. 9 Pro: 1.5″, 466 × 466
    LTE and Satellite in every 8 Pro (47 and 51 mm) only in 9 Pro inReach, also 43 mm
    Flashlight white and red in Pro additionally green
    Diving up to 40 m, 10 ATM up to 40 m, 10 ATM
    MicroLED Version ✅ 8 Pro 51 mm ❌

    Data according to Garmin Poland and comparison of Fenix 8 and 9 on Garmin’s blog.

    Dimensions and Screen: Basic Fenix 9 Like Fenix 8

    Here is the biggest surprise. The basic Fenix 9 has identical case dimensions and the same screen as the Fenix 8 AMOLED in all three sizes.

    Size Fenix 8 AMOLED Fenix 9 Fenix 8 Pro AMOLED Fenix 9 Pro
    43 mm 43 × 43 × 13.8 mm 43 × 43 × 13.8 mm no this size 43 × 43 × 13.3 mm
    47 mm 47 × 47 × 13.8 mm 47 × 47 × 13.8 mm 47 × 47 × 16 mm 47 × 47 × 13.8 mm
    51 mm 51 × 51 × 14.7 mm 51 × 51 × 14.7 mm 51 × 51 × 16.5 mm 51 × 51 × 15.8 mm

    The difference is only noticeable in the Pro versions. Fenix 9 Pro 47 mm is 2.2 mm thinner than Fenix 8 Pro 47 mm, and in the 51 mm size, the difference is 0.7 mm. Fenix 9 Pro features, for the first time in Fenix history, a titanium case.

    On the left Fenix 9 47 mm, on the right Fenix 9 Pro 51 mm. Photos: Garmin.

    The only new screen size is Fenix 9 Pro 51 mm: 1.5 inches and a resolution of 466 × 466. The basic Fenix 9 51 mm still has a 1.4-inch screen, like the Fenix 8. Garmin has not introduced a successor to the Fenix 8 Pro with a MicroLED screen.

    Battery: no changes in the basic model

    In smartwatch mode, the basic Fenix 9 works the same as the Fenix 8 AMOLED. Only the Pro 47 and 51 mm versions get longer battery life.

    Smartwatch mode (up to) 43 mm 47 mm 51 mm
    Fenix 8 AMOLED 10 days 16 days 29 days
    Fenix 9 10 days 16 days 29 days
    Fenix 8 Pro AMOLED no such size 15 days 27 days
    Fenix 9 Pro AMOLED 10 days 18 days 31 days

    Do not compare GPS working times directly. Garmin changed the names and settings of GPS modes in the Fenix 9, so the numbers from the specifications of the Fenix 8 and 9 refer to different modes. Reviewer DC Rainmaker did not notice a significant difference in GPS accuracy in practice.

    New features: most will also come to Fenix 8

    The Fenix 9 brings new software features: performance curve and zones in the Stamina function, new metrics for rowing (VO2max, power curve, FTP), load-bearing walking mode (rucking), and the Garmin Epic function. InReach versions download weather forecasts via satellite and LTE.

    According to DC Rainmaker, most of these features will come to the Fenix 8 in an update, but likely at the beginning of 2027. Only in the Fenix 9 will there be a new map engine with a perspective view, new GPS battery modes, and the ArcheryX mode.

    The heart rate sensor, according to reviewers (DC Rainmaker, the5krunner), is the same as in the Fenix 8. Garmin does not specify its generation on the Polish website.

    Do the bands from the Fenix 8 fit the Fenix 9?

    Yes, the width of the bands has not changed. Both series use the QuickFit attachment in the same sizes:

    Watch Size QuickFit Band Width
    43 mm 20 mm
    47 mm 22 mm
    51 mm 26 mm

    For the basic Fenix 9, Garmin lists exactly the same bands as compatible accessories for the Fenix 8. Since the widths have not changed, the QuickFit bands from the Fenix 5, 6, and 7 should also fit.

    With the Fenix 9 Pro, there is one caveat. Garmin lists QuickFit silicone bands for it, but titanium bracelets, some leather bands, jacquard, and tactical nylon bands have disappeared from the list.

    The Fenix 9 Pro also requires a different bike mount than the Fenix 8. This is a sign that the titanium Pro case has a different shape. Do not blindly transfer bracelets from the Fenix 8 to the 9 Pro.

    When choosing a new strap, look at the width, not the model list. In the store, you will find, among others:

    Tech-Protect Silicone 43 mm for Fenix 9.

    Tech-Protect Silicone 47 mm, width 22 mm.

    Tech-Protect Motion 51 mm, width 26 mm.

    Tech-Protect Iconband Pro 51 mm in black-red version.

    Does the protective glass from Fenix 8 fit Fenix 9?

    It’s better to buy a new one. Garmin does not sell its own screen protectors, and accessory manufacturers have released separate glasses for Fenix 9 and Fenix 9 Pro.

    • Fenix 9 Pro 51 mm: the glass from Fenix 8 definitely does not fit, as the screen is larger (1.5 instead of 1.4 inches).
    • 9 Pro 43 and 47 mm: the screen has the same diameter, but the case is different. Choose glass dedicated to 9 Pro.
    • Basic Fenix 9: the dimensions are the same as in Fenix 8, but glass manufacturers have made separate versions. It’s safer to take glass described as “for Fenix 9”.

    Fenix 9 has sapphire glass in every version, which is hard to scratch. However, a cover will be useful in the mountains and on the climbing wall, where the screen may hit a rock.

    Tempered glass Bizon Watch Glass Clear for Fenix 9 Pro.

    Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ for Fenix 9 Pro, two pieces in the set.

    In the store you will find, among others:

    [hs_products ids=”149425,147938,146782,148314,149407,149395,149315,149326″ cols=”4″]

    All glasses, films, and straps can be found in the category accessories for Garmin Fenix.

    Will the charger from Fenix 8 charge Fenix 9?

    Yes. Garmin states that the same charging cables with Garmin connectors are used for Fenix 8, 8 Pro, 9, and 9 Pro, in USB-C and USB-A versions. The cable you have from Fenix 8 will also charge Fenix 9.

    Fenix 9 or Fenix 8: which one to choose?

    Your situation Select
    You have the Fenix 8 AMOLED stick with it, according to DC Rainmaker most new features will come in an update
    You have the Fenix 8 with Gorilla Glass and often damage the screen Fenix 9, which has sapphire in every version
    You have the Fenix 8 Pro and want a thinner watch Fenix 9 Pro inReach
    You are buying your first Fenix and counting costs Fenix 8 AMOLED, clearly cheaper
    You want the largest screen Fenix 9 Pro 51 mm
    You have the Fenix 6 or 7 Fenix 9 or Fenix 8, both are a big leap

    On the left Fenix 9 Pro 43 mm, on the right Fenix 9 Pro inReach with SOS feature. Photos: Garmin.

    On the Garmin Poland website, the Fenix 9 costs from 4,299 PLN, the Fenix 9 Pro from 4,729 PLN, and the Fenix 9 Pro inReach from 5,159 PLN. The Fenix 8 AMOLED starts at 3,439 PLN (catalog prices as of 9.10.2026).

    If you run, also check out our ranking of the best running watch and the guide on running headphones.

    Summary: Garmin Fenix 9 vs Fenix 8

    • Basic Fenix 9 has the same dimensions, screen diagonal, and smartwatch battery life as the Fenix 8 AMOLED. You gain sapphire, a brighter screen, 64 GB, and faster maps.
    • Fenix 9 Pro is titanium and thinner than the 8 Pro, and has a larger screen at 51 mm.
    • LTE and satellite are only available on the Fenix 9 Pro inReach.
    • QuickFit bands fit: 20, 22, and 26 mm, just like in the Fenix 8. Do not transfer the band from the Fenix 8 to the 9 Pro without checking.
    • Buy new glass, and with the 9 Pro 51 mm, this is necessary. The charger remains the same.

    FAQ

    What is the difference between Fenix 9 and Fenix 8? The basic Fenix 9 has the same dimensions, screen diagonal, and smartwatch battery life as the Fenix 8 AMOLED. It differs with sapphire glass in each version, a titanium bezel, a brighter screen, 64 GB of memory, and faster maps. The Fenix 9 Pro has bigger changes: a titanium case, a thinner body, and a 1.5-inch screen in the 51 mm version.

    Does Fenix 9 Pro have LTE? Not all of them. LTE and satellite connectivity are only available on the Fenix 9 Pro inReach. The regular Fenix 9 Pro and Fenix 9 Pro Solar do not have them, although in the 8 series, every Pro model had LTE.

    Does the strap for Fenix 8 fit Fenix 9? Yes. Both series have a QuickFit attachment of 20 mm (43 mm), 22 mm (47 mm), and 26 mm (51 mm). However, Garmin does not offer titanium bracelets and parts of leather straps for the Fenix 9 Pro.

    Does the glass from Fenix 8 fit Fenix 9? No, for the Fenix 9 Pro 51 mm, because it has a larger screen. For the other versions, it is also better to buy dedicated glass, as manufacturers have prepared separate models for Fenix 9 and 9 Pro.

    Will Fenix 8 get features from Fenix 9? According to reviewer DC Rainmaker, most training features will come to Fenix 8 in an update, likely in early 2027. The new map engine, new GPS battery modes, and ArcheryX will remain exclusive to Fenix 9.

    How much does Garmin Fenix 9 cost in Poland? On the Garmin Poland website, Fenix 9 costs from 4,299 PLN, Fenix 9 Pro from 4,729 PLN, and Fenix 9 Pro inReach from 5,159 PLN (catalog prices as of 9.10.2026).

  • Running Headphones: Ranking of Open and Bone Conduction Headphones

    Running Headphones: Ranking of Open and Bone Conduction Headphones

    The best running headphones are those that do not block the ear. You can hear the music, but also the car, bike, and runner behind you. For outdoor running, choose open-ear headphones: with a clip on the ear, with a hook behind the ear, or with bone conduction.

    Our pick for most runners is the UGREEN FitBuds WS213: a hook behind the ear, IPX5 resistance, and up to 8 hours of playtime on a single charge. If you prefer something smaller, choose the QCY Crossky C30S headphones with a clip.

    Below we explain the differences between the three types of open-ear headphones, what waterproof ratings mean, and whether you can compete in races with headphones. Next, we compare seven models available in the store.

    Why open-ear headphones for running and not in-ear

    Regular in-ear headphones, such as AirPods Pro, block the ear canal. Additionally, some of them have active noise cancellation. On a treadmill, this is an advantage, but on the street or bike path, you hear your surroundings significantly worse, unless you activate the ambient mode.

    The risk is not unfounded. A study published in the journal Injury Prevention described 116 accidents in which pedestrians wearing headphones were struck by a train or another vehicle. In nearly one-third of the cases, a warning signal, such as a horn or train siren, sounded before the incident. The authors do not claim that the headphones themselves were to blame, but indicate distraction as a possible reason.

    On the street and path in the city, you need to hear cars, bicycles, and scooters. Photos: Trac Vu, Zoshua Colah / Unsplash.

    Open headphones play next to the ear canal, not in it. Sound from the environment reaches the ear unobstructed. There is also a second advantage: nothing presses on the ear canal, which many people appreciate during long runs.

    Types of running headphones: clip, hook, or bone conduction

    All three types leave the ear open. They differ in how they stay on the head and where the sound comes from.

    FeatureWith clip (ear-clip)With hook behind the ear (ear-hook)With bone conduction
    How it holdsclip tightens on the edge of the auricleband wraps around the ear from behindband around the back of the head
    Where the sound comes fromspeaker at the entrance to the earspeaker at the entrance to the earvibrations through the skull bones
    Stability while runninggoodbestgood
    Comfort with glasses and a hat✅depends on the model❌ band interferes with the hood
    Soundfullfullweaker bass
    Charging case✅✅❌ charging with a cable

    On the left, headphones with an ear-hook, on the right, with an ear-clip.

    Headphones with a clip are the smallest and lightest, weighing about 5 g each. You slide them onto the edge of your ear like a clip-on. They are suitable for casual running and everyday use, but may not fit well on larger ears.

    Earhook headphones cover the entire ear from the back. They are harder to shake off during fast running, jumping, or interval training. They are slightly larger than clips.

    Bone conduction headphones do not cover the ear. The band rests on the auricle, and the transducers sit on the cheekbones in front of the ear, transmitting vibrations through the skull bones. The ear canal is completely free, but the bass is weaker, and at higher volumes, a slight tickling sensation can be felt.

    Water resistance IPX: what IPX4, IPX5, and IPX8 mean

    Running headphones have constant contact with sweat and often with rain as well. Therefore, pay attention to the IP rating according to IEC 60529. The letter X indicates that dust resistance has not been tested.

    Running shoes on wet surface

    In autumn, running headphones must withstand rain and sweat. Photo: Idean Azad / Unsplash.

    • IPX4: resistance to splashes from all directions. Sufficient for sweat and light rain.
    • IPX5: resistance to water jets from a nozzle. Headphones can withstand heavy rain and rinsing under a tap.
    • IPX7: immersion up to 1 m for 30 minutes.
    • IPX8: longer or deeper immersion, under conditions specified by the manufacturer.

    One trap: IPX7 and IPX8 ratings do not automatically include IPX5. They are separate tests. Headphones resistant to immersion do not have to withstand a stream of water unless they have a dual rating, e.g., IPX5/IPX7.

    Can you run in headphones during competitions?

    It depends on the race regulations. The World Athletics rules prohibit headphones and players for athletes competing in the elite category. Amateur runners may be allowed, discouraged, or prohibited from using headphones by the organizer, especially if the route is not closed to traffic.

    The decision about headphones in competitions is made by the race regulations. Photos: Mārtiņš Zemlickis, Miguel A Amutio / Unsplash.

    In Poland, each race determines this itself. The regulations of the PHO3NIX KIDS Half Marathon 2026 in Poznań explicitly prohibit running with headphones under the threat of disqualification. The regulations of the Poznań Marathon and the Toruń Marathon 2026 do not mention headphones at all. Check the regulations of your race before the start.

    In the United Kingdom, England Athletics states that in shared paths with other users, in-ear headphones are prohibited, while bone conduction headphones are the only ones allowed in all street races. The regulations do not explicitly mention clip-on headphones, so their status in British competitions is unclear.

    Best Running Headphones: Our Picks

    All technical data in the comparison comes from the manufacturers. Where the manufacturer does not publish it, we note that it is the seller’s data.

    1. UGREEN FitBuds WS213: Best for Running

    UGREEN FitBuds WS213: soft ear hook and charging case.

    Our choice for most runners. UGREEN FitBuds WS213 feature a soft ear hook made of titanium alloy wire that returns to shape. This design holds securely during fast running and intervals.

    • Ear hook, ear remains open
    • Up to 8 hours on a single charge, up to 28 hours with the case
    • IPX5 resistance
    • 4 microphones with noise reduction for calls
    • Bluetooth 6.0, connection with two devices
    • App with 8 equalizer settings and touch configuration

    Advantages:

    • Longest playtime on a single charge among earbuds with a case
    • Stable hook for fast running

    Disadvantages:

    • Larger than clip-on earbuds
    • The hook may interfere with glasses with thick temples

    2. QCY Crossky C30S: the best clip-on headphones

    QCY Crossky C30S: clip-on earphone with a wireless charging case.

    QCY Crossky C30S are clips that weigh 5 g each. They have the longest working time in the comparison with the case: 40 hours, which means a week of daily workouts without searching for a charger. The case also charges wirelessly.

    • Clip on the edge of the ear
    • Up to 6 h on a single charge, up to 40 h with the case
    • IPX5 resistance
    • LDAC codec and Hi-Res Audio certification
    • Bluetooth 6.0, connection with two devices
    • Available in four colors: black, white, silver, and red

    Advantages:

    • Very light and small
    • Wireless charging case

    Disadvantages:

    • LDAC codec needs to be enabled in the app, it is off by default
    • The clip holds weaker than the hook during sprints

    3. UGREEN ClipBuds Pro WS218: with LDAC and ANC

    On the left UGREEN ClipBuds Pro WS218, on the right ClipBuds WS208 with a screen on the case.

    UGREEN ClipBuds Pro WS218 are clip headphones with the richest features in the comparison. They have LDAC codec, 6 microphones, and adaptive noise cancellation. In open headphones, it mainly suppresses low sounds, e.g., the noise of public transport.

    For running on the street, turn off the noise cancellation in the app. That’s exactly why you choose open headphones, to hear your surroundings.

    • Clip on the edge of the ear
    • Up to 7 hours on a single charge, up to 32 hours with the case
    • IPX5 resistance
    • LDAC, AAC, and SBC codecs
    • Bluetooth 6.0, connection with two devices
    • App with 8 equalizer settings

    A simpler alternative is UGREEN ClipBuds WS208. It does not have noise cancellation or LDAC, but it has a case with a color screen for changing tracks and volume, IPX5, and up to 30 hours of playback with the case.

    Advantages:

    • 6 microphones with wind noise reduction for calls
    • Noise cancellation for the city, turned off for running

    Disadvantages:

    • The noise reduction for street running needs to be turned off

    4. QCY Crossky C50: with four microphones

    QCY Crossky C50: clip with titanium wire and charging case.

    QCY Crossky C50 are clips with flexible titanium wire. The manufacturer claims that they emit 90% less sound to the outside than typical open headphones. This is important because open headphones are naturally audible to people nearby.

    • Clip on the edge of the ear
    • Up to 7.5 hours on a single charge, up to 35 hours with the case
    • IPX5 resistance
    • 4 microphones with wind noise filter
    • Bluetooth 6.0, wireless charging case

    Advantages:

    • Wind filter in the microphones, useful for conversations on the go
    • Long battery life for a clip-on

    Disadvantages:

    • Clip less stable than a hook at a fast pace

    5. Baseus Eli Sport 1: two ways to wear

    Baseus Eli Sport 1: open headphones with a flexible hook.

    Baseus Eli Sport 1 can be worn in two ways: as two separate headphones or connected by a neckband. With the neckband, if a headphone falls out of your ear, it stays on your neck instead of on the asphalt.

    • Open headphones, separately or with a neckband
    • Up to 7.5 hours on a single charge (at half volume), up to 30 hours with the case
    • IPX4 resistance
    • 16.2 mm drivers
    • Connection to two devices, Baseus app

    Advantages:

    • The neckband prevents losing the headphones
    • Large drivers

    Disadvantages:

    • Only IPX4, meaning resistance to sweat and light rain, not heavy downpours

    6. UGREEN HiTune S3: simple, without an app

    UGREEN HiTune S3: C-shaped clips.

    UGREEN HiTune S3 are simple clips weighing 5.3 g each. They do not have an app, they are controlled only by touch. For many people, this is an advantage: you put them on and run.

    According to UGREEN, the clip fits on an ear size up to 2.5 cm. It may not fit on a larger ear.

    • Clip on the edge of the ear
    • Up to 7.5 h on a single charge, up to 30 h with the case
    • IPX5 resistance
    • Bluetooth 5.4
    • Available in three colors: black, white, and purple

    Advantages:

    • Light and easy to use
    • 15 minutes of charging gives 2 hours of playtime

    Cons:

    • No app and equalizer
    • May not fit large ears

    7. BlitzWolf BW-BTS8: bone conduction headphones with music memory

    BlitzWolf BW-BTS8: band around the back of the head, transducers on the cheekbones.

    BlitzWolf BW-BTS8 are the only bone conduction headphones in the comparison. Their distinguishing feature is built-in 32 GB memory. You upload music and run without your phone, so you don’t need an armband or belt.

    The manufacturer does not publish the specifications for this model, so the data below comes from the seller.

    • Bone conduction, band around the back of the head
    • Up to 10 hours of operation, charging via cable
    • IPX8 resistance (immersion conditions not specified)
    • 32 GB memory for music files
    • Physical buttons instead of touch panels
    • Weight 28 g

    Advantages:

    • Running without a phone
    • Ear completely free

    Disadvantages:

    • Weaker bass than in clip-on headphones with a hook
    • The band interferes with a hood and high collar

    [hs_products ids=”121271,125496,126455,115383,140613,105183,66297″ cols=”4″]

    Running Headphones in a Table

    ModelTypeBattery (headphones / with case)Water ResistanceConnection to 2 devicesApp
    UGREEN FitBuds WS213hook8 h / 28 hIPX5✅✅
    QCY Crossky C30Sclip6 h / 40 hIPX5✅✅
    UGREEN ClipBuds Pro WS218clip7 h / 32 hIPX5✅✅
    QCY Crossky C50clip7.5 h / 35 hIPX5no data✅ (vendor data)
    Baseus Eli Sport 1hook or band7.5 h / 30 hIPX4✅✅
    UGREEN HiTune S3clip7.5 h / 30 hIPX5no data❌
    BlitzWolf BW-BTS8bone conduction10 h (without case)IPX8 (vendor data)no data❌

    How to choose in brief:

    • Do you run fast and far? UGREEN FitBuds WS213 with hook.
    • Want small, lightweight headphones? QCY Crossky C30S.
    • Do you talk a lot on the phone? UGREEN ClipBuds Pro or QCY Crossky C50.
    • Are you afraid of losing a headphone? Baseus Eli Sport 1 with a neckband.
    • Do you want to run without a phone? BlitzWolf BW-BTS8 with 32 GB of memory.

    What else to pay attention to when choosing

    Control. Touch panels can be easily activated by accident while running, for example, when adjusting your hat. If this annoys you, in the UGREEN FitBuds app, you can change the gesture assignments. Physical buttons, like those on the BlitzWolf, require a clear press, making them harder to accidentally activate.

    Battery life. Manufacturers measure playtime in specifications under test conditions, for example, Baseus at half volume. On the street, you’ll turn up the music to cut through the noise, so expect shorter battery life than specified. For long runs, choose models with at least 7 hours of playtime.

    Glasses and hat. Clips interfere the least with sports glasses. The hook behind the ear shares space with the temple, while the bone conduction headphones band competes with a hood and headband.

    Phone during training: where to hide it

    Runner with a phone in hand in the city

    A phone in hand gets tiring quickly; a band or belt is more comfortable. Photo: Pedro Farto / Unsplash.

    Headphones are half of the set. You need to fit the phone somewhere, and in the shorts pocket, it knocks against your thigh. We compared the methods in the guide how to run with a phone, and you can find bands and belts in the category running accessories.

    If you want to run without a phone, but with music and pace measurement, a GPS watch will come in handy. We gathered models for runners in the ranking best running watch. For the gym, where there is no street traffic, regular in-ear headphones will also work well, as we write in the text how to choose headphones for the gym.

    Summary: which headphones for running

    Runner on a path at sunset

    Photo: McCarthy Beckan / Unsplash.

    • Best for running: UGREEN FitBuds WS213, stable hook and 8 hours of playtime.
    • Best with a clip: QCY Crossky C30S, 5 g and 40 hours with the case.
    • For calls: UGREEN ClipBuds Pro with 6 microphones.
    • No phone: BlitzWolf BW-BTS8 with 32 GB memory.
    • Always open headphones on the street, and turn off noise cancellation.

    You can find the full offer in the category open-ear and clip headphones. Free shipping on orders over 100 PLN.

    FAQ

    What headphones are best for running? For outdoor running, open headphones that don’t block the ear are best: with a clip, behind-the-ear hooks, or bone conduction. You can hear cars and bicycles. Models with behind-the-ear hooks stay the most stable during fast running.

    Are bone conduction headphones better for running? They leave the ear completely free and stay well on the head, but they have weaker bass. Clip and behind-the-ear hook headphones also leave the ear canal open and sound fuller. Bone conduction headphones have an advantage when you are competing in events that only allow this type of headphones.

    Do clip headphones fall out while running? At a steady pace, a well-fitted clip stays in place. During sprints and jumps, headphones with behind-the-ear hooks are more secure. The clip may also not fit well on very large or very small ears.

    What waterproof rating is sufficient for running? For sweat and light rain, IPX4 is sufficient. If you run in any weather, choose IPX5, which is resistant to water jets. IPX7 and IPX8 ratings refer to immersion and do not automatically include resistance to water jets.

    Can you run with headphones in a marathon? It depends on the race regulations. Some organizers prohibit headphones, while others allow them. The World Athletics rules prohibit them for elite athletes. Check the regulations of your race before the start.

    Can you swim with running headphones? Headphones with IPX4 and IPX5 are not suitable for swimming. The IPX8 class indicates resistance to immersion, but only under the conditions specified by the manufacturer, so check them in the instructions before swimming.

  • iPhone Duo Case: Which One Protects the Hinge? Ranking [2026]

    iPhone Duo Case: Which One Protects the Hinge? Ranking [2026]

    The best case for the iPhone Duo today is Spigen Tough Armor Pro MagFit: armored, with a hinge cover and MagSafe magnets. If you want a hinge cover and a stand in one, choose Spigen Slim Armor Pro S. The thinnest is CARE by PanzerGlass Discovery: 0.9 mm thick and 14 g.

    The pre-sale of the iPhone Duo, referred to before the presentation as the iPhone Fold, starts on October 16 at 2:00 PM, and sales begin on October 23. The phone costs from 9,999 PLN, so cases are usually purchased together with it, not a week later.

    However, choosing a case for the folding iPhone is different than for a regular one. You need to decide whether to protect the hinge, how much thickness and weight to add, and how the case will interact with the external screen. Below we explain these three decisions and compare seven cases from four brands available in the store.

    Case for the iPhone Duo: what to pay attention to with the folding iPhone

    The foldable phone has two halves and a hinge between them. Therefore, almost every case for the iPhone Duo consists of two separate parts: one covers the half with the external screen, the other covers the half with the cameras. The differences begin at the hinge.

    Hinge cover: covered or exposed

    The Duo hinge consists of over 100 components and is one of the most vulnerable parts of the foldable phone. Cases are divided into two groups here:

    • With hinge cover. A flexible strap covers the back and connects both parts of the case. It protects the hinge but adds thickness.
    • With exposed hinge. Two independent shells, the back remains on top. The case is slimmer, but the hinge has no protection.

    If the phone often ends up on the floor, choose a hinge cover. If you mainly carry it in a bag and care about appearance, the exposed hinge will suffice.

    Thickness and weight: Duo is already heavy

    The iPhone Duo weighs 254 g and is the heaviest iPhone in history. When folded, it has a thickness of 11.3 mm. Each case adds more grams and millimeters, and in a phone carried in the pocket of pants, this is felt more than in a classic iPhone.

    Therefore, in this case, a thin case makes more sense than usual. A rugged case offers better protection but turns the Duo into a hefty block.

    MagSafe through two halves

    The Duo charges wirelessly via MagSafe and Qi2 with a power of up to 25 W. Most cases in this selection have built-in magnets, so the charger, wallet, or car mount stick to the case. They do not have magnets Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro in Crystal Clear version and Bizon Case Tur.

    There are two caveats. With Tough Armor Pro, Spigen warns that some MagFit accessories may not fit because the hinge cover interferes. With Slim Armor Pro, the manufacturer states that some magnetic and wireless chargers may charge intermittently or not at all, and recommends charging with a cable.

    Left edge of the external screen and Shift Left Edge setting

    Apple anticipated that thick cases might overlap the edge of the screen. In the Display & Brightness settings, there is an option that the English version of iOS calls Shift Left Edge. It roughly doubles the black frame on the left side of the external screen so that the back gesture works correctly when the edge of the case covers a piece of the display.

    The option was discovered by Nicolas Lellouche during tests right after the September presentation, and described by MacRumors. Thanks to it, the edge of the rugged case does not interfere with going back.

    Best cases for iPhone Duo: our picks

    In the store, we have cases from four brands: Spigen, UAG, PanzerGlass, and Bizon. Three Spigen models protect the hinge, while the other cases in the lineup leave it exposed. The ESR and Tech-Protect cases have not yet made it to the offer.

    1. Spigen Tough Armor Pro MagFit: best protection

    On the right, you can clearly see the strap that covers the hinge and connects both halves of the case.

    Our choice for anyone who wants to protect the entire phone. Spigen Tough Armor Pro MagFit has a full hinge cover, which also connects both parts of the case, along with a rugged construction with corner cushioning. It is available in the store under the name “Tough Armor Mag,” but the EAN code matches the Pro version from Spigen’s website.

    • Polycarbonate and TPU with Air Cushion technology
    • Full hinge cover, according to Spigen, slimmer than previous covers from this brand
    • N52 magnets for MagSafe
    • Raised edges around the screen and cameras
    • Available in two colors: black and Metal Slate

    Advantages:

    • Rugged construction
    • The hinge cover connects both halves of the case

    Disadvantages:

    • The hinge cover adds thickness
    • May interfere with some MagFit accessories

    2. Spigen Slim Armor Pro S MagFit: hinge cover and stand

    Slim Armor Pro S: a metal ring that acts as a stand, and a hinge cover.

    Spigen Slim Armor Pro S MagFit is the only case in the comparison that combines hinge protection and a stand. According to Spigen, the cover conceals the entire hinge, and its texture is designed not to interfere with folding. On the back, there is a metal ring that rotates 360°, which acts as a support at various angles.

    • Polycarbonate and TPU with Air Cushion cushioning
    • Full hinge protection, SecuLink system connecting both parts
    • Metal ring with a stand, 360° rotation
    • N52 magnets for MagSafe accessories

    Advantages:

    • Hinge protection and stand in one case
    • The ring rotates 360°, so you can set the phone vertically and horizontally

    Disadvantages:

    • Spigen warns that some magnetic and wireless chargers may not charge through the case
    • The ring adds thickness to the back

    3. Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro: transparent with hinge protection

    Ultra Hybrid Pro MagFit in Frost Black color.

    If you want the phone to be visible through the case while keeping the hinge covered, choose Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro. According to the manufacturer, the case features a hinge cover with the SecuLink system that covers the folding point and does not obstruct folding. There are two versions available in the store:

    Both versions according to Spigen are protected against yellowing.

    Ultra Hybrid Pro Crystal Clear, version without magnets.

    Advantages:

    • Hinge cover in a slim case, through which the phone is visible
    • Available in a version with MagSafe or without

    Disadvantages:

    • The Crystal Clear version does not have magnets, so the MagSafe charger will not attach
    • No stand

    4. UAG Mouve XTE: with 360° stand

    UAG Mouve XTE: on the left, both halves of the case, on the right, the unfolded stand.

    UAG Mouve XTE has a built-in 360° rotating metal stand. It is more useful on a foldable phone than on a regular one, as the unfolded 7.6″ screen works well for movies and FaceTime calls on the table. The stand also acts as a ring for your finger.

    • Two parts: a translucent polycarbonate plate and a TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) frame with a soft-touch finish
    • Drop test according to MIL-STD-810G 516.6 (manufacturer’s declaration), Air-Soft corners
    • Built-in MagSafe module
    • Available in two colors: ash and ice

    Advantages:

    • Stand in vertical and horizontal position
    • Declared drop standard in lightweight construction

    Disadvantages:

    • In the manufacturer’s photos, the hinge is exposed

    5. UAG Mouve: durable without extras

    UAG Mouve consists of two independent shells, the hinge is exposed.

    UAG Mouve is made of the same material and has the same declared MIL-STD-810G standard as XTE, but without a stand. The back is flat, without a protruding support. It’s a good choice if you want solid corner protection and don’t need a stand.

    Advantages:

    • Declared drop standard, without protruding base
    • The phone is visible through the translucent back

    Cons:

    • Exposed hinge, like in XTE

    6. CARE by PanzerGlass Discovery: the thinnest

    PanzerGlass Discovery aramid back: thin, but the hinge remains exposed.

    CARE by PanzerGlass Discovery is made of aramid fiber, from the same family of materials as Kevlar. According to the manufacturer, it is 0.9 mm thick and weighs 14 g, so it adds very little to the 254 g of the phone. It is the only case in the comparison for which the manufacturer provides thickness and weight.

    • Aramid fiber, rigid and scratch-resistant
    • Raised edges around the cameras
    • Compatible with MagSafe and Qi

    Advantages:

    • Very thin and lightweight
    • The Duo remains slim when folded

    Disadvantages:

    • No declared drop standard and cushioning corners
    • Exposed hinge

    7. Bizon Case Tur: in five colors

    Bison Case Tur: two parts with transverse grooves.

    Bison Case Tur is a plastic case with characteristic transverse grooves. It is the only case in the lineup available in five colors: black, navy blue, light gray, light blue, and red.

    • Plastic, two separate parts
    • Raised edges around the screen and cameras
    • Compatible with wireless charging

    Advantages:

    • Largest selection of colors
    • Distinctive pattern with transverse grooves

    Disadvantages:

    • No MagSafe magnets
    • In the manufacturer’s photos, the hinge is exposed

    [hs_products ids=”147879,149078,149077,149075,147356,147354,146924,149101″ cols=”4″]

    iPhone Duo Cases in Table: Hinge, MagSafe, Stand

    FeatureSpigen Tough Armor ProSpigen Slim Armor Pro SSpigen Ultra Hybrid ProUAG Mouve XTEUAG MouvePanzerGlass DiscoveryBizon Case Tur
    Hinge Protection✅✅✅❌❌❌❌
    MagSafe✅✅✅ MagFit version✅✅✅❌
    Stand❌✅ 360° ring❌✅ 360° rotating❌❌❌
    MaterialPC + TPUPC + TPUPC (MagFit) or PC + TPU (Crystal Clear)PC + TPUPC + TPUaramid fiberplastic
    Drop ProtectionAir CushionAir CushionAir CushionMIL-STD-810G testMIL-STD-810G testno dataraised edges
    Best formaximum protectionprotection with standshowing phone colorwatching on the tableeveryday protectionslim phonecolor choice

    How to choose in short:

    • Do you often drop your phone? Spigen Tough Armor Pro.
    • Do you want hinge protection and a stand? Spigen Slim Armor Pro S.
    • Do you like transparent cases? Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro MagFit.
    • Is the stand more important than the hinge? UAG Mouve XTE.
    • Do you want corner protection without extras? UAG Mouve.
    • Do you carry the Duo in your pants pocket? PanzerGlass Discovery.
    • Are you looking for a specific color? Bizon Case Tur.

    What else to buy for the iPhone Duo

    With a foldable phone, it’s worth thinking about two things besides the case right away.

    Screen protection. You can apply tempered glass for the iPhone Duo on the outer screen. The inner screen bends, so glass won’t hold up on it. Here, only film for the iPhone Duo screen remains.

    Charger. Apple does not include it in the box. To charge the Duo to 50% in about 20 minutes, you need a power adapter with at least 60 W. We compared specific models in the article which charger for iPhone Duo.

    If you are still hesitating whether to buy the Duo at all, check out our comparison iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 or the article about the price and release of iPhone Duo in Poland.

    Summary: which case for iPhone Duo

    • Best protection: Spigen Tough Armor Pro MagFit, rugged case with hinge protection.
    • Hinge protection with stand: Spigen Slim Armor Pro S MagFit.
    • Transparent with hinge protection: Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro, with or without magnets.
    • Lightest and thinnest: CARE by PanzerGlass Discovery, 0.9 mm and 14 g.
    • Most colors: Bizon Case Tur, but without MagSafe.

    The selection of Duo iPhone cases will continue to grow. If you want to have a case on the day you pick up your phone, order it together with the pre-sale. You can find the current offer in the category Duo iPhone cases, and shipping is free for orders over 100 PLN.

    FAQ

    Does the Duo iPhone case protect the hinge? Not all of them. In our offer, the cases that protect the hinge are Spigen: Tough Armor Pro, Slim Armor Pro S, and Ultra Hybrid Pro. UAG Mouve, UAG Mouve XTE, PanzerGlass Discovery, and Bizon Case Tur leave the hinge exposed.

    Does the MagSafe case work with the Duo iPhone? Yes. The Duo iPhone supports MagSafe and Qi2 up to 25 W, and most cases in this lineup have built-in magnets. The Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro Crystal Clear and Bizon Case Tur do not have magnets. With the Spigen Tough Armor Pro, some MagFit accessories may not fit due to the hinge cover.

    Can tempered glass be applied to the inner screen of the Duo iPhone? No. The inner screen bends, so it is only protected by a film. Tempered glass is only suitable for the outer screen.

    Does a Galaxy Z Fold case fit the Duo iPhone? No. The Duo iPhone has different dimensions (when folded 84.1 × 117.8 × 11.3 mm) and a different arrangement of cameras and buttons. You need a case designed for the Duo.

    Does the Duo iPhone case cover the outer screen? Thicker cases may slightly overlap the left edge of the screen. Apple accounted for this in the Shift Left Edge setting, which widens the black frame on the left so that the back gesture works smoothly.

    How much does the iPhone Duo with a case weigh? The phone itself weighs 254 g. The PanzerGlass Discovery adds 14 g. The weights of other cases are not provided by the manufacturers.

    When will there be more cases for the iPhone Duo? Cases from Spigen, UAG, PanzerGlass, and Bizon are already available in the store, and more brands will be added gradually. You can always find the current selection in the iPhone Duo case category.

  • POCO F9 Ultra vs F8 Ultra: is it worth switching?

    POCO F9 Ultra vs F8 Ultra: is it worth switching?

    The most important thing in this comparison is what has not changed: both phones have the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor. The F9 Ultra adds an 8,050 mAh battery instead of 6,500 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and a 200 MP main camera. In return, it is heavier, thicker, and more expensive: starting at 3,299 PLN compared to 2,799 PLN for the F8 Ultra.

    The short answer: the upgrade is usually not worth it. If you are buying for the first time, the F9 Ultra makes sense primarily if battery life is the most important factor for you. In other cases, the cheaper F8 Ultra offers almost the same.

    Below is the full table, point-by-point differences, and the answer to the question of whether the case and charger from the F8 Ultra fit the F9 Ultra. It is worth knowing right away that neither of these phones comes with a charger in the Polish box.

    On the left POCO F9 Ultra, on the right POCO F8 Ultra. You can see a completely different layout of the camera island. Photos: Xiaomi.

    POCO F9 Ultra vs F8 Ultra: comparison table

    Parameter POCO F9 Ultra POCO F8 Ultra
    Release September 1, 2026 November 26, 2025
    Price in Poland (Xiaomi, 10.02.2026) from 3,299 PLN from 2,799 PLN
    Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 + VisionBoost D8 chip Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
    Memory 12/256, 16/512, 16 GB/1 TB 12/256, 16/512 GB
    Screen 6.9″ AMOLED, 185 Hz 6.9″ AMOLED, 120 Hz
    Peak Brightness (25% of screen) 4,500 nits 3,500 nits
    Screen Glass Gorilla Glass 7i POCO Shield Glass
    Main Camera 200 MP, OIS 50 MP Light Fusion 950, OIS
    Telephoto 50 MP, 5x periscope, OIS 50 MP, 5x periscope, OIS
    Ultrawide / Front 50 MP / 32 MP 50 MP / 32 MP
    Battery 8,050 mAh 6,500 mAh
    Wired / Wireless Charging 100 W / 50 W 100 W / 50 W
    Reverse Charging 27 W wired, 22.5 W wireless 22.5 W wired, wireless (power not specified)
    Dimensions 163.49 × 77.94 × 8.74 mm 163.33 × 77.82 × 7.9 mm (black) / 8.3 mm (Denim Blue)
    Weight 235 g 218 g (black) / 220 g (Denim Blue)
    Resistance IP68 IP68
    Charger in the box (PL) ❌ ❌

    Data according to the manufacturer’s specifications (F9 Ultra, F8 Ultra) and the Polish Xiaomi store.

    Performance: the same Snapdragon, additional gaming chip

    Both have Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, manufactured using a 3 nm process, so you won’t feel a difference in everyday use and applications. In the Geekbench 6 benchmark, GSMArena even measured slightly lower scores for the F9 Ultra (3,530 / 10,500 points compared to 3,636 / 10,876 points).

    VisionBoost D8 chip and the effect of its work in the game. Photos: Xiaomi.

    The F9 Ultra adds a separate VisionBoost D8 chip. According to Xiaomi, it is responsible for frame interpolation up to 185 fps, which is supported by over 20 games. The improvement of image details (AI Super Resolution) currently works only in five titles, including PUBG Mobile and Genshin Impact.

    There is also a new variant of 16 GB/1 TB. If you keep a lot of 8K movies on your phone, that’s a point. For most people, 256 GB or 512 GB is sufficient.

    Display: 185 Hz and higher brightness

    Both displays are 6.9 inches and have the same resolution of 2608 × 1200. The differences are:

    • refresh rate of 185 Hz compared to 120 Hz in F8 Ultra,
    • peak brightness of 4,500 nits compared to 3,500 nits (both at 25% screen area); in GSMArena’s measurements, it’s 4,333 versus 3,509 nits,
    • Gorilla Glass 7i instead of POCO Shield Glass.

    However, 185 Hz only works in supported games. According to GSMArena, in the system and apps, F9 Ultra operates at 120 Hz, just like F8 Ultra, so you won’t notice a difference while scrolling.

    Cameras: 200 MP, but smaller sensor

    Camera island of POCO F9 Ultra with the main 200 MP camera and 5x telephoto lens

    Camera island of POCO F9 Ultra. Photo: Xiaomi.

    F9 Ultra has a main camera of 200 MP instead of 50 MP. However, this does not automatically mean better photos. According to GSMArena, the sensor in F8 Ultra is physically larger (1/1.31″ compared to 1/1.56″), and a larger sensor collects more light overall.

    In practice, 200 MP will be useful when you want to crop photos heavily or print them in large format. GSMArena describes the new camera more as a sideways change than an upgrade, although it rates the night photos from the F9 Ultra very well.

    The rest of the set is almost the same: a 50 MP telephoto lens with 5x optical zoom and OIS, a 50 MP wide-angle, and a 32 MP front camera. The F9 Ultra adds slow motion up to 1920 fps in Full HD.

    Battery and Charging: the Biggest Difference

    8,050 mAh is 1,550 mAh more than the 6,500 mAh in the F8 Ultra, which is almost a quarter more. This is the strongest argument for the new model, especially if you play games or record a lot.

    The charging power is the same: 100 W wired, 50 W wireless. Since the F9 Ultra’s battery is larger, it takes longer to charge. In GSMArena’s test with the original Xiaomi charger, the F9 Ultra had 61% after 30 minutes and a full battery in just under an hour. The F8 Ultra charged to full in 39 minutes in GSMArena’s test with the original Xiaomi charger.

    POCO F9 Ultra charges another phone with a cable

    Wired reverse charging on the POCO F9 Ultra. Photo: Xiaomi.

    The reverse charging is also stronger: 27 W wired on the F9 Ultra compared to 22.5 W on the F8 Ultra. You can charge headphones, a watch, or even another phone with a cable.

    Games and temperature: does the F9 Ultra overheat?

    Playing on the POCO F9 Ultra held horizontally

    POCO F9 Ultra in a game. Photo: Xiaomi.

    The F9 Ultra is marketed as a gaming phone, but GSMArena’s test shows the other side of the coin. According to reviewers, the phone heats up significantly under load, and the cooling system does not handle heat dissipation well. During long sessions, performance drops.

    The 185 Hz display and frame interpolation work only in supported games. If you play other titles, the F9 Ultra will behave practically like the F8 Ultra, just with a larger battery.

    Tip: for gaming, choose a thin case. A thick armored case makes heat dissipation difficult, and with a heating phone, this is a noticeable difference.

    Dimensions and weight: the F9 Ultra is heavier

    A larger battery also means greater weight. The F9 Ultra weighs 235 g and is 8.74 mm thick. The F8 Ultra weighs 218–220 g and is 7.9–8.3 mm thick, depending on the color. The difference of 15–17 g is noticeable when holding the phone in one hand for a long time. Both models have IP68 resistance.

    Does the case from POCO F8 Ultra fit the F9 Ultra?

    No. The dimensions of the front are almost identical, but the F9 Ultra is thicker and, most importantly, has a completely different camera island layout. This is visible in the manufacturer’s photos above. Judging by them, the camera cutout in the F8 Ultra case will not align with the lenses of the F9 Ultra.

    No accessory manufacturer in our offer labels the case as common for both models. You need a new case and new glass for the F9 Ultra.

    Bizon Case Angelo for POCO F9 Ultra: smoky back and black frame.

    Bizon Case MatteO for POCO F9 Ultra with a magnetic ring.

    3mk FlexibleGlass for the screen and GrizzGlass for the camera.

    In the store for F9 Ultra you will find, among others:

    [hs_products category=”2678″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales”]

    You can find the full offer in the category accessories for POCO F9 Ultra. If you are sticking with F8 Ultra, check out the category accessories for POCO F8 Ultra.

    Tip: in the box of both phones, there is a simple protective case from Xiaomi. It’s enough to start with, but there is no glass or camera cover.

    Charger: it is not included in the box in Poland

    On the Polish Xiaomi website, the contents of the box for both models include a phone, a USB-C cable, a case, and a SIM card ejector. There is no charger, although the global specification for the F9 Ultra lists a power adapter. If you already have a Xiaomi 100 W charger for the F8 Ultra, you can use it with the F9 Ultra as well. Both models achieve the full 100 W only with the Xiaomi charger.

    If you are buying a charger anew, it does not have to be an original Xiaomi. In the GSMArena test, the F8 Ultra charged almost as quickly with a USB Power Delivery 120 W charger and PPS up to 20 V: 76% after 30 minutes compared to 78%. A 100 W charger with PPS only up to 16 V provided 55% after half an hour.

    So look for a charger with PPS up to around 20 V, not just one with a high wattage. GSMArena tested the F9 Ultra only with the Xiaomi charger, but it has the same 100 W charging system. We discuss specific models in the guide what is the best charger for POCO F8 Ultra, and the full selection is in the network chargers category.

    Wireless charging and magnetic accessories

    Both models achieve a full 50 W wirelessly only with the Xiaomi dock. With a regular induction charger, the charging is much slower: in the GSMArena test, the F8 Ultra charged at around 8 W on a Qi2 charger. The F9 Ultra was not tested this way, but it has the same charging system.

    None of the models have built-in magnets. To use magnetic car mounts, power banks, or chargers, you need a case with a magnetic ring, e.g., the mentioned Bizon Case MatteO. You can find mounts in the phone mounts category, and chargers in the inductive chargers category.

    F9 Ultra can also wirelessly charge other devices with a power of 22.5 W. Just place headphones or a watch on its back. F8 Ultra also has reverse wireless charging, but Xiaomi does not specify its power.

    POCO F9 Ultra or F8 Ultra: which one to choose?

    Your situation Choose
    You have F8 Ultra and are satisfied with it Stick with F8 Ultra
    You have F8 Ultra, but the battery doesn’t last all day of gaming F9 Ultra
    You are buying your first POCO phone and counting every penny F8 Ultra
    You play titles that support 185 Hz F9 Ultra (be prepared for heating)
    You want a lighter phone F8 Ultra
    You need 1 TB of storage F9 Ultra

    If you have an older model, we also compared POCO F8 Ultra with F7 Ultra. Pre-release leaks and the F9 Pro model are described in the article POCO F9 Pro and F9 Ultra: premiere and leaks.

    Summary: POCO F9 Ultra vs F8 Ultra

    • The same processor. The difference concerns only games that support the VisionBoost D8 chip, and the F9 Ultra heats up more in them.
    • Larger battery (8,050 mAh) is the strongest argument for the new model.
    • 185 Hz and 200 MP look impressive on paper, but in everyday use, the difference is smaller than the numbers suggest.
    • F8 Ultra is cheaper: by 500 PLN, and it is also lighter and still very efficient.
    • The case from F8 does not fit, but the Xiaomi charger does. There is no charger included in the Polish box for either of them.

    Regardless of your choice, it’s worth securing the new phone right away. Start with the category accessories for POCO F9 Ultra. Shipping is free for orders over 100 PLN.

    FAQ

    Is it worth switching from POCO F8 Ultra to F9 Ultra? For most people, no. Both have the same processor, so the switch makes sense mainly if you need a larger battery.

    Does the case for POCO F8 Ultra fit F9 Ultra? No. The F9 Ultra is thicker and has a different camera island layout, so the cutout in the F8 Ultra case won’t align with the lenses. You need a case designed for the F9 Ultra.

    How much does POCO F9 Ultra cost in Poland? On the Xiaomi Poland website, the POCO F9 Ultra costs from 3,299 PLN for the 12/256 GB version. The F8 Ultra is available from 2,799 PLN.

    Does the POCO F9 Ultra come with a charger in the box? In Poland, no. According to the Polish Xiaomi website, the box contains the phone, a USB-C cable, a case, and a SIM card ejector. You need to buy the charger separately or use the Xiaomi 100 W charger if you already have it.

    Will the charger from the POCO F8 Ultra charge the F9 Ultra? Yes. The Xiaomi 100 W charger will charge the F9 Ultra at full power because both models have the same charging system. For chargers from other manufacturers, look for PPS support up to about 20 V.

    Does the POCO F9 Ultra have a better camera than the F8 Ultra? It has a main camera with a higher resolution (200 MP compared to 50 MP), but the F8 Ultra has a physically larger sensor. The 5x telephoto, wide-angle, and front cameras are very similar in both models.

  • The best cases for iPhone 18 Pro: ranking of 10 models

    The best cases for iPhone 18 Pro: ranking of 10 models

    The best case for the iPhone 18 Pro is the ESR Cyber Tough Kickstand MagSafe: rugged, with a foldable stand and MagSafe magnets. If you prefer to showcase the phone’s color, choose the transparent Spigen Ultra Hybrid MagSafe, and if you are looking for armor with MagSafe for drops up to 5.5 m according to the manufacturer, UAG Pathfinder.

    All cases in the ranking are marked by manufacturers as “17 Pro / 18 Pro” because the bodies of both phones have the same dimensions. We explain why this is the case and what from the 17 Pro you cannot transfer in the text whether the case from the iPhone 17 Pro fits the 18 Pro.

    Below is a ranking of 10 cases from eight brands, a comparison in a table, and tips on which to choose for specific needs.

    iPhone 18 Pro and the original transparent Apple case with MagSafe. Photos: Apple.

    What to pay attention to when choosing a case for the iPhone 18 Pro

    MagSafe is the first thing to check. Through a case without magnets, the iPhone 18 Pro will still charge wirelessly, but the MagSafe charger holds weaker, and the wallet or car mount may fall off. Therefore, look for a case with a built-in magnetic ring.

    The second thing is camera protection. The camera island protrudes from the back, and the main camera features a new variable aperture. Look for a case with a lip higher than the lenses or with a camera cover. We wrote more about the aperture itself in the article does MagSafe harm the iPhone 18 Pro camera.

    The third is the type of case. You have three groups to choose from:

    • Rugged: thicker, with cushioning in the corners, often with a kickstand.
    • Hybrid and transparent: rigid back with a flexible frame, slim for everyday use.
    • With a flap or 360°: also protect the screen, but they are the thickest.

    Tip: always check the case for button placements and camera cutouts in the product images. A good case has separate, precise cutouts and a lip that extends above the lenses.

    Ranking: 10 best cases for iPhone 18 Pro

    1. ESR Cyber Tough Kickstand MagSafe: rugged with a kickstand

    ESR Cyber Tough Kickstand: the stand is a frame around the camera island.

    Our favorite. ESR Cyber Tough Kickstand MagSafe features a three-layer construction and Air Guard padded corners that absorb impact energy.

    ESR claims Military Grade protection at a level of 7x for this series. The stand is a metal frame around the camera island: when unfolded, it holds the phone on the table, and when folded, it acts as an additional bumper protecting the lenses.

    For whom: if your phone often lands on hard surfaces, and you also watch movies on it.

    Con: it is one of the thicker cases in the comparison.

    2. Spigen Ultra Hybrid MagSafe: transparent

    Spigen Ultra Hybrid MagSafe in Clear/White version, with a white magnetic ring.

    Spigen Ultra Hybrid MagSafe is a classic hybrid series from Spigen. Rigid polycarbonate back combines with a flexible TPU frame, and in the corners, Spigen uses Air Cushion technology, which are air cushions.

    The case is slim, and the transparent back shows the color of the phone. Raised edges protect the screen and camera from scratches when you place the phone on a table.

    Good when the iPhone 18 Pro should also look good in the case.

    3. Tech-Protect MagPrime MagSafe CC: matte with camera protection

    The abbreviation CC in the name stands for the raised frame around the cameras.

    Tech-Protect MagPrime MagSafe CC has the abbreviation CC in its name, which means Camera Cover. In practice, it is a raised frame around the camera island, with a separate cutout for each lens.

    The flexible TPU frame absorbs shocks, while the rigid polycarbonate back maintains its shape. The back has a matte finish, and the magnetic ring catches the MagSafe charger.

    Good when you are looking for a slim case that protects the camera.

    Cons: the manufacturer does not provide the declared drop resistance.

    [hs_products ids=”143069,147257,142338″ cols=”3″ title=”Top three in the ranking”]

    4. UAG Pathfinder MagSafe: armor with MagSafe for drops from 5.5 m

    UAG Pathfinder MagSafe: on the left black, on the right olive.

    UAG Pathfinder MagSafe is the most durable MagSafe case in the lineup. The manufacturer claims protection from drops from heights of up to 5.5 m and three times meets the requirements of the MIL-STD-810G 516.6 standard.

    Reinforced corners and frame absorb shocks, while the raised bezel protects the screen. The built-in MagSafe module works with chargers and magnetic accessories.

    For whom: if your phone works with you outdoors or you have children at home who like to drop it.

    Con: there is no stand.

    5. Spigen Tough Armor T MagSafe: three layers and a stand

    Tough Armor T: you can see the internal cushioning layer and the MagSafe ring.

    Spigen Tough Armor T MagSafe has three layers: a polycarbonate back, a TPU frame, and an internal cushioning layer. Spigen claims Military Grade protection for it.

    The back has a built-in stand for watching movies and video calls. The raised edges lift the camera above the surface of the table.

    Good when you are looking for a rugged case with a stand, but prefer Spigen over ESR.

    6. Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro: 360° protection with a clip

    The Unicorn Beetle Pro comes with a belt clip case.

    Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro encloses the phone in 360° protection. The front frame has a built-in PET film for the screen, and the whole case, according to the manufacturer, withstands drops from heights of up to 6 m and meets the MIL-STD-810H standard.

    The set includes a belt clip case with a stand. This case is for people who work physically and need their phone always at hand.

    Cons: this version does not have MagSafe magnets. If you need them, there are UB Grip Mag and Grip Pro Mag variants available in the store.

    7. ESR Classic Hybrid MagSafe Frosted: matte mist

    ESR Classic Hybrid in Frosted Black version.

    ESR Classic Hybrid MagSafe in Frosted version has a matte, semi-transparent back. The phone is visible, but without a mirror effect and without fingerprints.

    ESR uses Air Guard cushions in the corners and claims Military Grade protection at a level of 3x, which is lower than in Cyber Tough. In return, Classic Hybrid is noticeably slimmer.

    For whom: if you want to see the color of the phone, but without gloss.

    8. 3mk Misty MagCase: slim, in seven colors

    3mk Misty MagCase: black on the left, white on the right.

    3mk Misty MagCase is a case from a Polish brand with a transparent-matte finish. It is made of TPU and polycarbonate, has a built-in magnetic ring, and raised edges around the screen and camera.

    It is available in seven colors: black, white, burgundy, blue, orange, pink, and green.

    Choose it if you want a slim case with MagSafe and care about color.

    [hs_products ids=”147331,146521,146946,146724,146779″ cols=”5″ title=”Positions 4–8 in the ranking”]

    9. Ringke Fusion Magnetic: transparent with UV coating

    Ringke Fusion Magnetic also has openings for a lanyard.

    Ringke Fusion Magnetic is a minimalist transparent case with a polycarbonate back and TPU frame. According to the manufacturer, the back has a UV coating that reduces scratches and discoloration, and there are air pockets in the corners.

    It also has built-in openings for a phone lanyard.

    It fits if you are looking for a transparent case with MagSafe and the option to hang the phone on a lanyard.

    Cons: the manufacturer does not provide the declared drop resistance.

    10. Mercury BlueMoon Diary MagSafe: with flap

    Mercury BlueMoon Diary: the flap with pockets also protects the screen.

    Mercury BlueMoon Diary MagSafe is a book-style case that also protects the screen. It has a MagSafe ring on the back, which is not standard among flap cases.

    The flap has card pockets, and when folded, it also serves as a stand.

    For whom: if you carry cards along with your phone.

    Cons: you have to flip the flap every time you want to look at the screen.

    iPhone 18 Pro case: comparison in a table

    Case Type MagSafe Stand Screen Protection Declared Resistance
    ESR Cyber Tough Kickstand armored ✅ ✅ edge Military Grade 7x, Air Guard
    Spigen Ultra Hybrid transparent ✅ ❌ edge Air Cushion
    Tech-Protect MagPrime CC matte hybrid ✅ ❌ edge no data from the manufacturer
    UAG Pathfinder armored ✅ ❌ edge up to 5.5 m, MIL-STD-810G
    Spigen Tough Armor T armored ✅ ✅ edge Military Grade
    Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro 360° with holster ❌ ✅ ✅ PET film up to 6 m, MIL-STD-810H
    ESR Classic Hybrid Frosted matte semi-transparent ✅ ❌ edge Military Grade 3x, Air Guard
    3mk Misty MagCase slim ✅ ❌ edge no data from the manufacturer
    Ringke Fusion Magnetic transparent ✅ ❌ edge air pockets
    Mercury BlueMoon Diary with flap ✅ ✅ flap ✅ flap no data from the manufacturer

    Which case to choose for the iPhone 18 Pro?

    • Do you often drop your phone? UAG Pathfinder or ESR Cyber Tough.
    • Do you carry your phone on your belt? Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro.
    • Do you want to see the color? Spigen Ultra Hybrid or Ringke Fusion Magnetic.
    • Do you want a slim case with camera protection? Tech-Protect MagPrime CC.
    • Do you watch movies on the table? ESR Cyber Tough or Spigen Tough Armor T.
    • Do you carry cards with your phone? Mercury BlueMoon Diary.

    Do you have a larger model? We have prepared a separate ranking for the best cases for iPhone 18 Pro Max.

    What to complement the iPhone 18 Pro case with

    Most cases protect the back and corners, but not the screen or the glass over the lenses. It’s worth adding:

    Remember that the camera glass from the iPhone 17 Pro does not fit the 18 Pro, as the camera island is different.

    Summary: the best cases for iPhone 18 Pro at a glance

    • Best overall: ESR Cyber Tough Kickstand MagSafe, rugged with a stand.
    • Best transparent: Spigen Ultra Hybrid MagSafe.
    • Slim with camera protection: Tech-Protect MagPrime MagSafe CC.
    • Highest claimed durability: Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro (up to 6 m, without MagSafe) and UAG Pathfinder (up to 5.5 m, with MagSafe).

    A full selection, over 250 models in stock, can be found in the category cases for iPhone 18 Pro. Free shipping is available for orders over 100 PLN.

    FAQ

    What is the best case for iPhone 18 Pro? For most people, ESR Cyber Tough Kickstand MagSafe: rugged, with a stand and MagSafe magnets. If you prefer slim and transparent, choose Spigen Ultra Hybrid MagSafe.

    Does the iPhone 17 Pro case fit the 18 Pro? In practice, yes, because the bodies of both models have the same dimensions, although Apple does not officially declare compatibility. Details and exceptions are described in a separate article about case compatibility.

    Which case for iPhone 18 Pro is the most durable? The highest durability is claimed by Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro (drops up to 6 m) and UAG Pathfinder (up to 5.5 m). However, Supcase does not have MagSafe magnets.

    Does every case for iPhone 18 Pro work with MagSafe? No. The MagSafe charger and accessories hold firmly only through cases with a built-in magnetic ring. In our ranking, 9 out of 10 cases have it, with the exception of Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro.

    Does the case for iPhone 18 Pro Max fit the 18 Pro? No. Pro Max is larger, so it needs its own case. We have prepared a separate ranking for it.

    Does the iPhone 18 Pro case protect the camera? Most cases in the ranking have a lip higher than the lenses, and the Tech-Protect MagPrime CC additionally has a raised frame around the camera island. The glass over the lenses is best protected by a separate glass for the camera.

  • Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Detector: Which One to Choose for the Heating Season?

    Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Detector: Which One to Choose for the Heating Season?

    A regular smoke detector does not detect carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide has no smell or color and does not produce smoke, so it can only be detected by a carbon monoxide detector with a CO sensor. If you have a gas stove, heater, boiler, or fireplace in your apartment, you need a smoke and carbon monoxide detector that meets the EN 14604 and EN 50291-1 standards, such as the Meross CS11.

    The heating season is just beginning, and with it comes the period when carbon monoxide poisoning is most prevalent. From October 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026, the fire department recorded 3,750 incidents involving carbon monoxide, in which 1,354 people were injured and 69 died.

    In the text, you will find the difference between a smoke detector and a carbon monoxide detector, an explanation of when a regular one is sufficient and when a smart one is useful, and installation guidelines. We also write about the obligation that is already in effect in new buildings and will cover all apartments.

    Smoke Detector vs. Carbon Monoxide Detector: What Are the Differences?

    Each of them detects a different hazard.

    • Smoke detector reacts to smoke particles in the air. It warns of a fire, often before visible flames appear.
    • Carbon monoxide detector, or carbon monoxide (CO), usually has an electrochemical sensor that measures CO concentration. Carbon monoxide is produced during incomplete combustion of gas, coal, wood, or oil, for example, with a faulty heater or a blocked chimney.

    Carbon monoxide is dangerous because it is undetectable. It has no smell, color, or taste, and the initial symptoms of poisoning, such as headache, drowsiness, and nausea, can easily be mistaken for fatigue. In such a situation, the smoke detector remains silent because there is simply no smoke.

    Standards EN 14604 and EN 50291-1

    Look for the standard numbers on the packaging of a good detector:

    StandardWhat it concerns
    EN 14604Autonomous smoke detectors for homes
    EN 50291-1Carbon monoxide detectors for domestic use

    The smoke and carbon monoxide detector should meet both. Meross CS11 has, according to the manufacturer, certificates EN 14604:2005/AC:2008 and EN 50291-1:2018.

    Obligation of smoke and carbon monoxide detectors: deadlines

    The Regulation of the Minister of the Interior and Administration of November 21, 2024 (Journal of Laws 2024, item 1716) introduces a requirement for the installation of autonomous detectors. According to the Chief Command of the State Fire Service, starting from January 1, 2030, it will apply to all houses and apartments in Poland.

    According to the fire service announcement, the deadlines are as follows:

    Who it concernsFrom when
    New residential buildingsFrom December 23, 2024, already in effect
    Establishments with hotel services, e.g., short-term rentalsFrom June 30, 2026, already in effect
    All houses and apartmentsFrom January 1, 2030.

    What specifically needs to be present:

    • at least one autonomous smoke detector in each residential unit,
    • at least one autonomous carbon monoxide detector in every room where solid, liquid, or gas fuel is burned.

    The deadline for existing apartments is the year 2030. However, the risk of carbon monoxide poisoning is highest during each heating season, from October to March.

    Advice: an autonomous detector has a sensor, a signaler, and a power supply in one housing and activates the sound alarm by itself. It is most often powered by a battery. Phone notifications are an addition, not a requirement of regulations.

    Smoke and carbon monoxide detector from our offer: Meross CS11

    Meross CS11 is our choice for an apartment with a gas stove, heater, or fireplace. It has two independent sensors: a photoelectric sensor for smoke and an electrochemical sensor for carbon monoxide, thus combining a smoke detector and a carbon monoxide detector in one housing.

    • Standards EN 14604 and EN 50291-1
    • Alarm 85 dB(A) at a distance of 3 m
    • At a CO concentration of 300 ppm, the alarm activates in less than 3 minutes
    • Built-in CR123A battery, according to the manufacturer, for about 10 years of operation
    • LED in three colors: standby, low battery level or fault, alarm
    • Ceiling or wall mounting, no electrician required

    Advantages:

    • The only one in the comparison that detects carbon monoxide
    • Meets both standards, which are worth checking before purchase
    • The battery lasts about 10 years according to the manufacturer

    Cons:

    • The description does not mention an app or phone notifications
    • The battery is non-replaceable, so after it runs out, the entire sensor needs to be replaced

    Wi-Fi Smoke Detector: When a Smart Version is Useful

    A regular detector will trigger an alarm in the apartment, but no one will hear it if everyone is at work. A smart smoke detector will then send a notification to your phone. It is useful in a single-family home, in an apartment that is often empty, or when older parents are left at home.

    Meross MA151 with MSH450MA Hub

    Meross MA151 is mounted on the ceiling. The Meross hub is needed for configuration and notifications.

    Meross MA151-UN detects smoke using dual optical detection technology, which according to the manufacturer recognizes both white and black smoke and reduces false alarms. Despite “Wi-Fi” in the name, the sensor connects to the Meross hub via 433 MHz, and only then does the hub connect to the router and the app.

    • Alarm of at least 85 dB, audible from 3 m
    • Two AA batteries, according to the manufacturer up to 3 years
    • Notifications for alarms, low battery, and offline status, event history in the app
    • With multiple sensors connected to the hub, all will sound the alarm when one detects smoke
    • Compliance with EN 14604 according to the manufacturer’s website

    Advantages:

    • Notification on your phone when you are not at home
    • Connected alarms throughout the house

    Disadvantages:

    • Detects only smoke, not carbon monoxide
    • Requires the Meross hub for configuration and notifications

    Meross MSH450MA Hub

    Meross MSH450MA Hub can handle up to 32 Meross devices. It has its own 110 dB siren and a local mode, allowing alarms to function even during an internet outage. It connects to the router via 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi or an Ethernet cable and supports the Matter standard.

    [hs_products ids=”115382,138837,121070″ cols=”3″]

    Comparison: smoke and carbon monoxide detector vs smart smoke detector

    FeatureMeross CS11Meross MA151 + hub MSH450MA
    Detects smoke✅✅
    Detects carbon monoxide (CO)✅❌
    StandardsEN 14604, EN 50291-1EN 14604 (according to the manufacturer’s website)
    Phone notifications❌✅
    Power supplyCR123A battery, approx. 10 years2× AA, approx. 3 years
    Hub required❌✅
    Best forrooms with a gas stove, heater, fireplacehallway and bedroom, when the house is often empty

    If you want both a carbon monoxide detector and phone notifications, connect both: CS11 where something is burning, and a smart smoke detector in the hallway.

    Where to install the carbon monoxide and smoke detector

    The exact location and distances are always determined by the manufacturer’s instructions. However, a few rules are repeated almost everywhere:

    1. Carbon monoxide detector in a combustion room. This refers to a kitchen with a gas stove, a bathroom with a gas heater, a boiler room, and a room with a fireplace. This is also stipulated by regulations. The fire department states that a separate CO detector is most often installed at eye level, at least 1.5 m from the floor and about 2 m from the device that may be a source of carbon monoxide.
    2. Sensor connected according to the instructions. CS11 detects both smoke and carbon monoxide, so check the installation location in its manual, not in the general recommendations for CO detectors.
    3. Smoke detector on the ceiling, preferably in the hallway between the bedrooms and the rest of the apartment. Smoke rises.
    4. Away from the stove and steam. Do not install the smoke sensor directly above the stove or near the bathroom door. Steam and smoke from pots are common sources of false alarms. In a bathroom with a heater, keep the sensor away from the shower.
    5. Do not cover the sensor with furniture or curtains and do not install it right next to a window, door, or ventilation grille, as fresh air will distort the measurement.
    6. Regularly test the sensor with the button, as often as recommended in the manual. MA151 can also initiate a test from the app.

    What to do when the carbon monoxide detector alarms

    The carbon monoxide detector alarm is a signal for immediate action, even if no one feels unwell. You cannot smell carbon monoxide, and the symptoms can be easily overlooked. At high concentrations, loss of consciousness can occur within minutes.

    1. Open windows and doors to let in fresh air.
    2. Take everyone outside, including pets. Move anyone showing symptoms to a safe place with access to fresh air and do not return inside.
    3. Call 112 if someone has symptoms of poisoning or the alarm does not stop after ventilating.
    4. Do not restart the furnace or heater until a professional checks it.

    What to watch out for? The fire department lists symptoms such as headache and dizziness, shortness of breath, nausea, and vomiting. It’s easy to mistake them for a cold or fatigue, and the detector will alert you before you feel them.

    Attention: the detector does not replace inspection. The fire department reminds you to regularly check the tightness and clean the chimneys and to ensure that the ventilation has proper draft.

    Summary: which smoke and carbon monoxide detector to choose

    • The smoke detector does not detect carbon monoxide. For rooms with a gas stove, heater, boiler, or fireplace, a carbon monoxide detector is needed.
    • Meross CS11 combines both sensors and meets the EN 14604 and EN 50291-1 standards.
    • Smart smoke detector Meross MA151 with hub MSH450MA will send a notification when you are not at home, but will not detect carbon monoxide.
    • From January 1, 2030, every apartment must have a smoke detector, and rooms with fuel combustion must also have a carbon monoxide detector.

    The most carbon monoxide poisonings occur during the heating season, which is just beginning, so it is not worth waiting until 2030. You can find all detectors in the smart home sensors category, and delivery is free for orders over 100 PLN.

    FAQ

    Does a smoke detector detect carbon monoxide? No. A smoke detector reacts to smoke particles, while carbon monoxide, which is a colorless gas, does not produce smoke. To detect carbon monoxide, a carbon monoxide detector with a CO sensor is needed, e.g., Meross CS11.

    Since when is a smoke and carbon monoxide detector mandatory? In new buildings from December 23, 2024, in establishments with hotel services from June 30, 2026, and in all houses and apartments from January 1, 2030. A carbon monoxide detector is required in rooms where fuel is burned. This is due to the regulation of the Ministry of Interior and Administration from November 21, 2024.

    Where to install a carbon monoxide detector? In a room where fuel is burned: in a kitchen with gas, in a bathroom with a heater, in a boiler room, or in a room with a fireplace. A separate CO detector is usually installed at eye level, at least 1.5 m from the floor and about 2 m from the combustion source, but the manufacturer’s instructions are binding.

    What standard should a carbon monoxide detector meet? A carbon monoxide detector for home use should meet the EN 50291-1 standard, while a smoke detector should meet the EN 14604 standard. A smoke and carbon monoxide detector should have both.

    Does the Meross smart smoke detector work without the internet? The sound alarm operates locally, and the Meross MSH450MA hub has a local mode in which alarms work even during a network failure. Without the internet, you just won’t receive notifications on your phone.

    How long does the battery last in a carbon monoxide detector? In the Meross CS11, the built-in CR123A battery lasts up to about 10 years according to the manufacturer. It is non-replaceable, so after that time, the entire detector needs to be replaced.

    What to do if the carbon monoxide detector is beeping? A continuous alarm indicates danger: open windows, get everyone to fresh air, and call 112 if someone shows symptoms or the alarm does not stop. Short, single beeps from time to time usually signal a low battery, malfunction, or the end of the detector’s lifespan. Check the meaning of the signals in the manual.