Blog

Vivo X300 Ultra and OPPO Find X9 Ultra are the only smartphones with a dual 200 MP setup — but each implements this idea differently. Vivo focuses on ZEISS T* optics with gimbal stabilization and a 400 mm teleconverter, while OPPO counters with a triple optical zoom from Hasselblad (3× + 10×) and a 7050 mAh battery. Which one better replaces a compact camera? We compare them point by point.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra has its global premiere on April 21, 2026 — this is the first Ultra model in OPPO’s history to hit European markets. Vivo X300 Ultra has been available for pre-order in Europe since April 16. Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor and Sony LYT-901 main sensor, but differ practically in everything else.

Note: OPPO Find X9 Ultra had not yet officially premiered at the time of publication of this article. OPPO specifications are based on the manufacturer’s official announcements, certification entries (China Telecom), and reliable leaks.

Looking for accessories for the new flagship? Check out cases and glass for OPPO Find X9 and accessories for Vivo X phones at Home Screen.

Specifications Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra

The full specifications of both phones can be compared on GSMArena.

Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra — ZEISS vs Hasselblad

The camera of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the camera of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra are the two most ambitious photographic systems in smartphones of 2026. Both have a dual 200 MP setup, but differ in philosophy and zoom range.

Main camera — the same sensor, different approach

Both phones use the same Sony LYT-901 sensor (1/1.12″) — one of the largest in smartphones. The key difference lies in the optics:

Vivo X300 Ultra has a brighter telephoto lens with gimbal OIS stabilization and ZEISS T* certification (anti-reflective coatings). The f/1.85 aperture is a solid result.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra according to leaks goes further with an aperture of f/1.5 — it’s one of the brightest optics in smartphone history (some sources report f/1.8, official data will be revealed on April 21). A brighter lens means more light on the sensor, which translates to better photos in low light. Hasselblad calibration gives photos a characteristic, warm tone.

OPPO’s advantage in the brightness of the main lens (f/1.5 vs f/1.85). Vivo responds with gimbal stabilization, which can provide sharper images at longer exposure times.

Zoom – this is where the biggest difference lies

This is the key point of this comparison.

Vivo X300 Ultra has one 200 MP telephoto lens with 3.7× optical zoom (85 mm) and an optional ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter, which provides 17.4× optical zoom. In the range of 3.7-17×, it is the best zoom system in a smartphone — but the teleconverter is purchased separately.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra has two telephoto lenses: 200 MP 3× periscope (70 mm) and 50 MP 10× periscope (230 mm) — both built into the phone. You don’t need any accessories to achieve 10× optical zoom. Lossless zoom reaches up to 40-50× thanks to computations.

In the range of 3-5× both phones will deliver excellent photos from the 200 MP sensors. Above 5× OPPO has a built-in 10× zoom, while Vivo needs a teleconverter. But with the teleconverter, Vivo achieves 17.4× at full 200 MP — a range unavailable to any other smartphone.

OPPO wins in versatility (triple zoom without accessories), Vivo wins in maximum range (400 mm with teleconverter).

Ultrawide

Here Vivo X300 Ultra has a significant advantage. The Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″) sensor is much larger than the Sony LYT-600 (1/1.95″) in OPPO. Additionally, the ultrawide Vivo has its own OIS stabilization, which is lacking in OPPO.

A larger sensor and OIS clearly result in better ultrawide photos, especially in low light and when recording video.

Vivo X300 Ultra wins — the 1/1.28″ sensor with OIS is in a different league.

Night Photos

Both phones use the same main sensor, the Sony LYT-901, but OPPO has a brighter lens (f/1.5 vs f/1.85). In theory, this provides about 40% more light on the sensor, which should translate to better night photos from the main camera.

Vivo responds with gimbal stabilization OIS, which allows for longer exposure times without blur. In practice, both approaches yield great results at night.

Slight advantage for OPPO due to a potentially brighter lens — but the final aperture will be confirmed at the premiere, and the real difference in photo quality will only be visible after independent tests.

Video

Vivo X300 Ultra dominates in video:
– 4K/120 fps 10-bit Log on all lenses (main, tele, ultrawide)
– APV 422 encoding and ACES workflow
– 8K/30 fps, Dolby Vision HDR

OPPO Find X9 Ultra according to current information records 4K/120 fps with 10-bit color and Dolby Vision HDR. Log recording and 8K have not yet been confirmed by OPPO — the predecessor Find X9 Pro supported Log up to 4K/120 with ACES, so the Ultra model likely offers this as well. Full details will be revealed after the premiere on April 21.

Vivo wins video — 10-bit Log on every lens and APV 422 are professional tools. For stable video recording in motion, a tripod or gimbal for your phone will come in handy.

Screen – twin parameters

Both phones have nearly identical screens — 6.82″ LTPO AMOLED with a 2K resolution and a 144 Hz refresh rate. These are some of the best displays on the market.

Vivo claims a higher peak brightness (4500 vs 3600 nits) and offers ZEISS Master Color calibration — a bonus for photographers evaluating images on the screen. OPPO counters with HDR Vivid support and NanoCrystal Shield as screen protection.

Minimal draw — both screens are excellent. Vivo potentially has a brighter panel, but without independent tests, it’s hard to confirm.

Battery and Charging

OPPO Find X9 Ultra features the latest silicon-carbon battery with a capacity of 7050 mAh — one of the largest batteries in flagship devices on the market. Vivo offers 6600 or 7000 mAh depending on the variant.

The wired charging is identical (100 W), but OPPO has better wireless charging (50 W AirVOOC vs 40 W on Vivo). Both phones support reverse charging.

OPPO wins with the battery — guaranteed 7050 mAh and faster wireless charging.

Planning to take a flagship on a longer trip? Check out smartphone power banks and wall chargers at Home Screen.

Build, weight, and water resistance

Both phones have IP68 and IP69 certifications — they can withstand immersion in water and a stream of hot water under pressure. Taking photos in the rain is not a problem.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra is slightly thicker (9.15 mm vs 8.19 mm for Vivo) and weighs 235-238 g. Available in three color variants with eco-leather: Polar Glacier (light blue), Sand Canyon (orange), and Earth Tundra (dark brown). It has a dedicated camera button (Camera Quick Launch) and a quick access button Plus Key.

Vivo X300 Ultra is slimmer (8.19 mm) and weighs 232-237 g. Available in black, silver, and green with an Armor Glass finish. Both phones have an infrared emitter (IR blaster).

Draw — Vivo is slimmer, OPPO has a more interesting design with eco-leather and a dedicated camera button.

Vivo X300 Ultra price vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra price

The price of the Vivo X300 Ultra starts at 6500 PLN in pre-order with the Pro Video Rig Kit — this is the confirmed price. The price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet been officially announced and will only be revealed at the premiere on April 21, 2026. Based on the price of the OPPO Find X9 Pro (~5499 PLN in Europe), we estimate that the OPPO Find X9 Ultra will cost ~6000-7000 PLN, but this is just our estimation.

Both phones have dedicated photographic accessories — teleconverters (ZEISS 400 mm vs Hasselblad 300 mm) and grips with a battery.

The price of OPPO will be confirmed on April 21 — we will return with an update after the premiere.

Unique features – what distinguishes each model

Only Vivo X300 Ultra:

• ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra Teleconverter — 17.4× optical zoom in 200 MP
• 4K/120 10-bit Log on all lenses + APV 422 + ACES
• Ultrawide with 1/1.28″ sensor (Sony LYTIA 818) with OIS
• 5 MP multispectral sensor VCS 3rd generation
• Gimbal stabilization OIS (main camera)
• ZEISS Master Color screen calibration

Only OPPO Find X9 Ultra:

• Triple optical zoom (3× + 10×) — without accessories up to 230 mm
• Main lens f/1.5 — the brightest among flagships
• 7050 mAh battery — the largest in comparison
• 50 W wireless charging AirVOOC
• Dedicated camera button + Plus Key button
• Hasselblad Color Calibration on all lenses
• Hasselblad 300 mm teleconverter
• 5 years of system updates, 6 years of security updates

Summary: which one to choose?

Choose Vivo X300 Ultra if:
– You record professional videos (10-bit Log on every lens, APV 422)
– You need extreme zoom with a teleconverter (400 mm, 17.4×)
– You care about the best ultra-wide (1/1.28″ sensor with OIS)
– You prefer a slimmer design (8.19 mm)
– You want neutral, true-to-life colors from ZEISS

Choose OPPO Find X9 Ultra if:
– You want a triple zoom built into the phone (3× + 10× without accessories)
– You mainly photograph in low light (f/1.5 lens)
– You care about the largest battery (7050 mAh)
– You value warm, distinctive colors from Hasselblad
– You want a dedicated camera button

The comparison of Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra is a clash of two mobile photography philosophies — ZEISS vs Hasselblad, gimbal vs triple zoom, professional video vs versatility without accessories. There is no single winner — there is your winner.

Looking for a case, tempered glass, or charger for your new flagship? Check out accessories for OPPO Find X9, Vivo X accessories, and wireless chargers at Home Screen — with free delivery from 100 PLN and a rating of 4.9/5 on Google.

FAQ – frequently asked questions

When is the OPPO Find X9 Ultra premiere?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra premiere takes place globally on April 21, 2026. This is the first Ultra model in OPPO’s history to hit the European markets.

What is the price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra in Poland?
The price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet been officially announced. Based on the price of the OPPO Find X9 Pro (~5499 PLN), we estimate that the Ultra model will cost around 6000-7000 PLN. The official price will be revealed on April 21.

Will the OPPO Find X9 Ultra be available in Poland?
Yes — OPPO has confirmed the global premiere, including for the European markets. In Poland, OPPO is available, among others, through Media Expert. The exact date of availability in stores depends on the distributor.

Which phone takes better photos?
The Vivo X300 Ultra camera excels in video (10-bit Log on each lens, APV 422) and ultra-wide (1/1.28″ sensor). The OPPO Find X9 Ultra camera has an advantage in zoom (built-in 10× without accessories) and night shots (f/1.5 lens). Both have the same main sensor, the Sony LYT-901.

Which phone has a better battery?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has a 7050 mAh battery with 50 W wireless charging. The Vivo X300 Ultra has a 6600-7000 mAh battery with 40 W wireless charging.

What is the best camera smartphone in 2026?
The Vivo X300 Ultra, OPPO Find X9 Ultra, and Xiaomi 17 Ultra are the top three camera smartphones of 2026. Each excels in a different category — Vivo in video, OPPO in zoom, Xiaomi in mechanical optical zoom with Leica colors.

What are the opinions on the OPPO Find X9 Ultra?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet had its official premiere (April 21, 2026), so independent opinions and reviews will appear after this date. Its predecessor — the OPPO Find X9 Pro — ranked 5th in the DxOMark ranking, which bodes well for the Ultra model.

Vivo X300 Ultra has a dual 200 MP setup with ZEISS optics and a 400 mm teleconverter, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra features a 1-inch Leica sensor with a mechanical zoom of 75-100 mm. Both phones target photographers, but the philosophy of each is completely different — Vivo focuses on raw power and zoom range, while Xiaomi emphasizes the atmosphere of photos and hardware HDR. Which one better replaces a compact camera? If you’re looking for the best photography smartphone of 2026, the choice comes down to these two models.

Vivo X300 Ultra went on European pre-sale on April 16, 2026, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has been available since the end of February. They are direct competitors in the ultra-premium segment, united by one ambition: to replace the compact camera. However, they differ in philosophy, optics, and price.

Specifications Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The full specifications of both phones can also be compared on GSMArena. Looking for accessories for your new flagship? Check out cases and glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra and accessories for Vivo X phones at Home Screen.

Camera Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra — which one takes better photos?

This is where the real fun begins — the camera of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the camera of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra approach mobile photography from completely different angles.

Camera Philosophy

Vivo X300 Ultra is a “technologist” — it focuses on raw specification power. The dual 200 MP sensor (main Sony LYT-901, f/1.85 + telephoto Samsung HP0, f/2.3) provides a huge field for framing and digital zooming. OIS stabilization at gimbal level and ZEISS T* certification on the main lens are parameters rarely seen in smartphones. Additionally, the ultra-wide lens with a large Sony LYTIA 818 sensor (1/1.28″) — significantly larger than the competition.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra is an “artist” — a 1-inch main sensor with LOFIC technology (hardware HDR without frame merging) and a mechanical optical zoom of 75-100 mm are solutions known from professional cameras. Collaboration with Leica translates into characteristic color reproduction and emulation of Leica M9 films.

Daytime photo quality

In good lighting, Vivo X300 Ultra produces more neutral, true-to-life colors. Photos from the 200 MP sensor have an enormous amount of detail — when cropped to a lower resolution, the effect is incredibly sharp.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra with a 1-inch sensor captures more light and creates a more natural background blur (bokeh). Colors in Leica Vibrant mode are warmer and more saturated, while in Leica Authentic mode — truer, with the characteristic “leica look”.

Draw. Vivo wins in detail and resolution, Xiaomi — in atmosphere and color reproduction. The choice depends on the photography style.

Night mode photos

Here, Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a clear advantage. The 1-inch sensor with LOFIC technology processes exposure information at the hardware level, resulting in more balanced night photos without the typical artifacts from merging multiple frames.

Vivo X300 Ultra performs well thanks to CIPA 7.0 stabilization, which allows for longer exposure times without blurring. In practice, both phones deliver excellent results at night, but Xiaomi retains more detail in shadows and better controls noise.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins — the LOFIC sensor is a real advantage in low light.

Zoom and telephoto lens

This is the key difference between the two phones.

Vivo X300 Ultra offers a 200 MP telephoto lens with a focal length of 85 mm (3.7× optical zoom). Additionally, there is an optional ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter, which provides up to 17.4× optical zoom at full 200 MP resolution. This is a record among smartphones.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a 200 MP telephoto lens with mechanical optical zoom of 75-100 mm (3.2-4.3×). This is the first such solution in a smartphone — a movable optical element provides true optical zoom without quality loss across the entire focal range.

At close-ups of 3-5×, Xiaomi delivers sharper images because it uses optical zoom without digital cropping. Above 5×, Vivo takes the lead — with the teleconverter, it achieves ranges unavailable to any other smartphone.

Vivo wins in range, Xiaomi — in photo quality in the popular 3-5× range. The ZEISS teleconverter is a powerful accessory, but you buy it separately.

If you plan to record professional video on your smartphone, a tripod or gimbal for your phone. will also be useful.

Ultrawide

Both phones have 50 MP ultrawide lenses with similar fields of view (~116°), but the Vivo X300 Ultra has a huge advantage with its 1/1.28″ Sony LYTIA 818 sensor — that’s more than twice the size of the Samsung JN5 (1/2.75″) in the Xiaomi. Additionally, the ultrawide Vivo has its own OIS stabilization.

In practice, the Vivo X300 Ultra should provide significantly better ultrawide photos, especially in low light, thanks to the larger sensor and stabilization.

The Vivo X300 Ultra wins — the 1/1.28″ sensor with OIS is in a completely different league than the 1/2.75″ without stabilization.

Video

Both phones record in 8K/30 fps, 4K/120 fps Log with support for ACES and Dolby Vision — this is currently the absolute top of smartphone video. The differences lie in the details:

Vivo X300 Ultra:
– 4K/120 fps 10-bit Vivo Log on all lenses (main, tele, ultra-wide)
– Encoding APV 422 (more efficient format than H.265)
– Dolby Vision HDR, 8K/30 fps

Xiaomi 17 Ultra:
– 4K/120 fps Log with ACES support (Academy Color Encoding System)
– Super slow-motion 1080p up to 1920 fps
– Leica film modes (warm color rendition)
– ShootSteady recording up to 2.8K/60 fps (advanced stabilization)
– Dolby Vision HDR, 8K/30 fps

Both of these machines offer professional video tools — Log, ACES, and 4K/120. The key advantage of Vivo is 10-bit Log on every lens (not just the main one) and APV 422 encoding. Xiaomi, on the other hand, offers super slow-motion 1080p/1920 fps and ShootSteady stabilization — ideal for dynamic shots in motion.

Tie in video — both phones are professional filmmaking tools. Vivo has better encoding (APV 422) and Log on all lenses, Xiaomi has better slow-motion and stabilization. For stable video recording in motion, a selfie stick with tripod function will also work well.

Screen — does 2K resolution make a difference?

Vivo leads in all screen parameters — 2K vs FHD+, 144 Hz vs 120 Hz, and 4500 nits peak brightness (claimed) vs 3500 nits from Xiaomi. ZEISS Master Color calibration is an additional bonus for photographers who want to evaluate photos directly on the phone’s screen.

Xiaomi counters with adaptive LTPO refresh rate, which saves battery by lowering the frequency to 1 Hz when sufficient. The Xiaomi screen offers 12-bit color depth and TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

Vivo wins with the screen — higher resolution, faster refresh rate, and brighter panel. Xiaomi counters with better color depth (12-bit) and eye protection certifications.

Battery and Charging — Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a significantly larger battery — 6600 or even 7000 mAh (depending on the variant) with a silicon-carbon cell, compared to 6000 mAh in the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Faster wired charging (100 W vs 90 W) is an additional advantage. In tests, EPREL showed that Vivo achieved about 57 hours of operation, placing it among the top smartphones. Both phones support reverse charging — you can charge headphones, a watch, or even a second phone with them.

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra has better wireless charging (50 W vs 40 W) and stronger wired reverse charging (22.5 W). In everyday use, both phones easily last a full day of intensive photography.

Vivo wins in battery capacity (even 1000 mAh more), Xiaomi in wireless and reverse charging.

Planning to take your flagship on a longer trip? Check out smartphone power banks and wall chargers to ensure that the battery doesn’t die at a crucial moment.

Build, weight, and water resistance

You will take both phones in your hand and feel the difference — Xiaomi is about 13-19 g lighter. With similar dimensions (~163 × 77 × 8.2-8.3 mm), every gram matters during long photography sessions.

Vivo X300 Ultra has IP68 and IP69 certifications — it can withstand immersion in water and a stream of hot water under pressure. Xiaomi 17 Ultra has an IP68 certification (immersion up to 6 m for 30 minutes). Taking photos in the rain or near water is not a problem for either of them.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra weighs 218.4 g (Black/White) or 219 g (Starlit Green). Available in three colors: black, white, and green. Both phones have an infrared emitter (IR blaster) for controlling home appliances.

Vivo X300 Ultra weighs 232-237 g (the black is lighter, the green is heavier) and has Armor Glass on the back. The construction is massive but solid — the aluminum frame and flat edges provide a secure grip. Available in black, silver, and green.

Vivo wins with IP protection (IP68+IP69 vs just IP68), but Xiaomi wins with weight — it is noticeably lighter.

Price in Poland — how much does each flagship cost?

The launch price of Xiaomi 17 Ultra was 6499 PLN for the 16/512 GB version, but it can currently be purchased from 5295 PLN. The official prices for this model in Poland have not yet been announced, but leaks suggest that Vivo X300 Ultra may cost around 7999 PLN for the 16 GB / 1 TB version.

Both phones have dedicated photography grips (Xiaomi Photography Kit, SmallRig Kit for Vivo), but you buy them separately. The ZEISS 400 mm teleconverter is a unique accessory that has no equivalent among competitors. The quality-to-price ratio favors Xiaomi — but Vivo with the pre-sale set levels the playing field.

Unique features — what distinguishes each model

Only Vivo X300 Ultra:

• ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter — 17.4× optical zoom in 200 MP
• Dual sensor 200 MP (main + telephoto) with ZEISS T* optics
• 4K/120 10-bit Vivo Log on all lenses + ACES workflow
• Ultrawide with 1/1.28″ sensor (Sony LYTIA 818) with OIS
• 5 MP multispectral sensor VCS 3rd generation
• 6600/7000 mAh battery (silicon-carbon)
• ZEISS Master Color screen calibration
• BeiDou satellite connectivity (1 TB version)
• Infrared port (IR blaster)
• OIS gimbal stabilization

Only Xiaomi 17 Ultra:

• Mechanical optical zoom 75-100 mm (first in a smartphone)
• 1-inch sensor with LOFIC (hardware HDR)
• Leica film modes (Leica Authentic, Leica Vibrant, film filters)
• Super slow-motion 1080p/1920 fps
• ShootSteady stabilization up to 2.8K/60 fps
• Bluetooth 6.0 and Wi-Fi 6e (tri-band)
• Support for eSIM (nano+eSIM or eSIM+eSIM)
• DxOMark 166 points (#6 globally)
• Xiaomi HyperAI (writing AI, translating AI, searching AI)

Summary: which one to choose?

Choose Vivo X300 Ultra if:
– You record a lot of video (8K and 4K/120 Log is a huge advantage over the competition)
– You need extreme zoom (400 mm with a teleconverter)
– You want maximum photo resolution (dual 200 MP)
– You prefer neutral, true-to-life colors from ZEISS
– You care about the best display (2K, 144 Hz)

Choose Xiaomi 17 Ultra if:
– You mainly photograph outdoors (IP68, lighter)
– You value the colors and atmosphere of Leica photos
– You take a lot of night shots (LOFIC sensor)
– You care about a lower price (from ~5295 PLN)
– You want a phone available immediately

The comparison of Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra shows that there is no single winner — it is your winner, depending on whether you prefer the raw power of Vivo or the artistic character of Leica in Xiaomi.

Looking for a case, tempered glass, or charger for your new flagship? Check out cases and glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra and wireless chargers at Home Screen – with free delivery from 100 PLN and a rating of 4.9/5 on Google.

FAQ — frequently asked questions

Will Vivo X300 Ultra be available in Poland?
Vivo X300 Ultra is available for pre-order in Europe since April 16, 2026, with shipping starting from April 24. It can be ordered through the official Vivo website and selected retailers.

What is the price of Xiaomi 17 Ultra in Poland?
Xiaomi 17 Ultra costs around 5295 PLN (current market price) for the 16/512 GB version up to about 6999 PLN for the 16 GB/1 TB version. The launch price was 6499 PLN. It has been available in Polish stores since March 2026.

Which phone takes better photos?
It depends on the photography style. The camera of Vivo X300 Ultra wins in zoom range, resolution, and video recording. The camera of Xiaomi 17 Ultra provides better night photos, warmer Leica colors, and better ultra-wide shots. For video — Vivo, for street and portrait photography — Xiaomi.

Is it worth waiting for the Vivo X300 Ultra, since the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is already available?
If your priority is video, extreme zoom, or dual 200 MP — yes, it’s worth the wait. If you care about immediate availability, IP68, a lighter design, and a lower price — the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a safe choice right now.

When is the Vivo X300 Ultra release?
European pre-sales start on April 16, 2026, and regular sales begin on April 24, 2026.

What is the best camera smartphone in 2026?
The Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra are the two main contenders for the title of best camera smartphone of 2026. Vivo leads in video and zoom, while Xiaomi excels in night photography and Leica colors. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and iPhone 17 Pro Max are strong competitors, but they do not have such advanced optical systems.

What are the reviews of the Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The first reviews of the Vivo X300 Ultra highlight its outstanding video capabilities and record zoom range. Reviews of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra praise its night photography, Leica colors, and mechanical optical zoom.

Vivo Pad 6 Pro is the flagship tablet with a 13.2-inch 4K display (3840 x 2512 px) with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor (3 nm), and a 13,000 mAh battery with 66 W charging. It has 8 speakers with Super Audio 7.0, supports the Vivo Pencil 3 with 16,384 levels of pressure, and a keyboard with a touchpad. Premiere: March 30, 2026 (China), Europe 2026. Price starting from ~2500 PLN (8/256 GB).

This is the most ambitious tablet Vivo has ever made — and the first one showcased at MWC 2026 in Barcelona with the European market in mind. The 4K display with a 3:2 aspect ratio, a VC cooling system with an area of over 71,000 mm², and up to 16 GB of LPDDR5X RAM — everything indicates a direct attack on the iPad Air and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE.

Vivo Pad 6 Pro technical specifications

4K 144 Hz Display — The Sharpest in Class

The most important element of the Vivo Pad 6 Pro is the 13.2-inch IPS LCD panel with a 4K resolution (3840 x 2512 pixels) with a 3:2 aspect ratio. The 144 Hz refresh rate and 540 Hz touch sampling ensure smoothness both when scrolling pages and drawing with a stylus.

The peak brightness reaches 1200 nits, and the color accuracy with a Delta E value of ≈ 0.8 makes the tablet suitable for photo and video editing. The panel displays a billion colors in the P3 palette and supports Dolby Vision — movies look truly cinematic on it.

Proportions 3:2 are a thoughtful choice — compared to the typical 16:10, you gain more vertical space, which you’ll appreciate when working with documents, browsing websites, and drawing. It’s the same aspect ratio that Microsoft uses in the Surface Pro.

Good to know: Vivo chose IPS LCD instead of OLED — this means no risk of screen burn-in and a lower price, but also weaker contrasts in low light. In daytime use, the difference is minimal thanks to TÜV Rheinland certification for low blue light emission.

Performance — Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

The performance is powered by Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 — the most powerful Qualcomm processor manufactured using a 3 nm process. The Oryon V3 Phoenix cores reach clock speeds of up to 4.6 GHz, and the Adreno 840 GPU handles even the most demanding mobile games at the highest settings.

In the AnTuTu benchmark, the tablet scores over 2 million points — that’s flagship smartphone territory and more than any other Android tablet on the market. The UFS 4.1 and LPDDR5X memory ensure lightning-fast data write and read speeds.

The VC (Vapor Chamber) cooling system with an area of 71,446 mm² keeps the temperature under control even during long gaming sessions or video rendering. You have as many as four variants to choose from:

• 8/256 GB — for multimedia and everyday work
• 12/256 GB — optimal for most users
• 12/512 GB — for content creators with a large file library
• 16/512 GB — for professionals and power users

The tablet runs on Android 16 with the OriginOS 6 overlay, which introduces floating windows, desktop mode, and a split screen activated by a two-finger gesture.

13,000 mAh Battery — up to two days of work

The Vivo Pad 6 Pro is equipped with a 13,000 mAh battery — one of the largest in any tablet on the market. For comparison: the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE has 10,090 mAh, and the iPad Air has a battery capacity of ~36 Wh (~9500 mAh equivalent).

In practice, this means:

• Up to 13 hours of continuous video playback
• Up to 78 days in standby mode
• All day of intensive work with documents, browsing, and multimedia

Charging 66 W replenishes the battery in a reasonable time — it’s not a speed record, but with a capacity of 13,000 mAh, it’s a good result. To charge, you need a USB-C cable and a wall charger with a minimum power of 66 W.

8 speakers and Dolby Vision

The Vivo Pad 6 Pro has 8 speakers arranged panoramically around the body — that’s twice as many as in the iPad Air or Galaxy Tab S10 FE. The Super Audio 7.0 technology simulates surround sound, and the system automatically adjusts the stereo channels to the tablet’s orientation.

Combined with a 4K display and support for Dolby Vision, this tablet turns into a portable mini-cinema. With a thickness of just 6.2 mm and a weight of 663 g, it can still be held in hand, although for longer movie sessions, it’s worth getting a holder or stand.

Stylus and keyboard — a tablet for work

The Vivo Pad 6 Pro supports two key accessories (sold separately):

Vivo Pencil 3 — a stylus with 16,384 pressure levels, a linear motor simulating paper resistance, and a dual tip (soft and hard). It charges magnetically on the tablet’s case and lasts about 15 hours on a single charge. The button on the body allows you to switch drawing modes.

Smart Touch Keyboard 6 Pro — a keyboard with a full-surface touchpad, magnetically connected via a pogo-pin connector. Adjustable tilt angle up to 140 degrees and a dedicated AI assistant key. In desktop mode, OriginOS 6 turns the tablet into a quasi-laptop with application windows, a taskbar, and mouse support.

Looking for a stylus for your tablet? At homescreen.pl you will find styluses for phones and tablets from trusted brands — including models compatible with Vivo tablets.

Vivo Pad 6 Pro vs competition

The Vivo tablet outperforms its Android competitors in screen resolution (the only 4K), battery capacity (13,000 mAh), and number of speakers (8). Samsung counters with the included S Pen and better app support in One UI. The iPad Air M3 offers an unmatched app ecosystem but costs more than twice as much.

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro is the closest price competitor — offering solid specifications for ~2000 PLN, but with a smaller 11.2-inch screen and lower resolution.

Vivo Pad 6 Pro price and availability in Europe

The Vivo Pad 6 Pro premiered on March 30, 2026 in China, and sales began on April 3, 2026. The tablet was showcased at the MWC 2026 in Barcelona, confirming plans for European distribution — the specific date and prices for Poland have not yet been announced.

According to the portals GSMManiak and Tabletowo, the European premiere is planned for 2026. GSMArena estimates the base price in Europe to be around 570 EUR.

When the Vivo tablet hits the Polish market, it is worth taking care of a case for Vivo Pad tablets right away — the aluminum casing looks premium but is prone to scratches and dents.

Summary

The Vivo Pad 6 Pro is the most powerful Android tablet on the market in 2026 — 4K 144 Hz display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 13,000 mAh and 8 speakers in a body that is only 6.2 mm thick. With an estimated price starting from ~2500 PLN, it offers significantly more power and higher resolution than the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE, and costs less than half the price of the iPad Air 13″.

If you are looking for a tablet for work, entertainment, and drawing — and you are not tied to the Apple ecosystem — this Vivo tablet should be at the top of your list. It’s worth keeping an eye on information about the European premiere.

Check out Vivo tablet accessories at homescreen.pl →

FAQ

When is the Vivo Pad 6 Pro premiere in Europe?

The tablet debuted in China on March 30, 2026, and was showcased at MWC 2026 in Barcelona. The European premiere is confirmed for 2026, but the specific date and prices have not yet been announced.

How much does the Vivo Pad 6 Pro cost?

The Vivo Pad 6 Pro price starts at 4499 CNY (~2500 PLN) for the 8/256 GB variant in China. The estimated base price in Europe is around 570 EUR. The 16/512 GB variant costs 6699 CNY (~3650 PLN).

What kind of display does this tablet have?

The Vivo Pad 6 Pro has a 13.2-inch IPS LCD panel with a 4K resolution (3840 x 2512 pixels), a refresh rate of 144 Hz, a brightness of 1200 nits, and support for Dolby Vision. The aspect ratio is 3:2.

Does the Vivo Pad 6 Pro support a stylus?

Yes — the tablet is compatible with the Vivo Pencil 3, which offers 16,384 levels of pressure, a dual tip, and magnetic charging. The stylus is sold separately.

How does it differ from the iPad Air?

The Vivo Pad 6 Pro offers a 4K display (vs Liquid Retina), a refresh rate of 144 Hz (vs 60 Hz), a 13,000 mAh battery (vs ~9500 mAh), and 8 speakers (vs 4) — for less than half the price of the iPad Air 13″. The iPad wins with its app ecosystem and M3 processor.

Is there a 5G version of the tablet?

No — the Vivo Pad 6 Pro is available only in a Wi-Fi version. No variant with 4G/5G cellular connectivity has been announced.

Vivo V70 is a smartphone with a Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 processor, a triple ZEISS camera with a 3x periscope telephoto lens, and a 5000 nit display — priced at 3099 PLN (promo 2699 PLN). Vivo V70 FE offers a 200 MP sensor, a 7000 mAh battery, and a glow-in-the-dark casing for 2099 PLN (promo 1799 PLN). Both models have an IP68/IP69 certification, 90 W charging, and Android 16.

Vivo V70 and Vivo V70 FE will hit the Polish market in 2026 as some of the most interesting proposals in the mid-range segment. Both models share the IP68/IP69 certification, 90 W fast charging, and Android 16 system, but apart from that, they are two completely different smartphones — aimed at different users.

Vivo V70 focuses on the ZEISS camera with a periscope telephoto lens and faster UFS 4.1 memory. The V70 FE (Fashion Edition) features a 7000 mAh battery, a larger 6.83-inch display, and a 200 MP sensor — at a lower price. Which one suits you? Let’s compare.

Vivo V70 vs V70 FE — key differences

Before we dive into the details, here are the key differences in one table:

In short: V70 has a better camera and faster processor at a higher price. V70 FE offers a larger battery and screen for a thousand zlotys less.

Specifications of Vivo V70

Vivo V70 FE Specification

Vivo V70 Camera — ZEISS with Zoom or 200 MP?

This is the biggest difference between these models and also the most important selection criterion.

Vivo V70 offers a triple ZEISS system with a 50 MP periscope telephoto lens and 3x optical zoom — something that practically does not exist in the competition at a price below 3500 PLN. ZEISS optics are present in all four lenses (three on the back + selfie), and it records video in 4K at 60 fps with dual stabilization OIS + EIS. The telephoto lens is great for portraits, concert photos, and street photography — it provides natural perspective compression without digital artifacts.

Vivo V70 FE focuses on raw resolution — the Samsung HP5 200 MP sensor with a 1/1.56 inch matrix. In good light, the photos are full of details, especially in cropped landscape shots. The 30x SuperZoom feature uses excess pixels for digital zooming, but the quality at higher zoom levels does not match the optical telephoto lens of the V70. There is also no separate telephoto lens and ZEISS branding.

Additionally, there are AI features common to both models:

• AI Night Mode — frame merging for night photos with noise reduction
• AI Portrait — background blur with precise subject cutout
• Scene Detection — automatic recognition of scene types

Tip: If you often take photos from a distance (concerts, sports, children at the playground), the telephoto lens in the V70 is a game-changer. If you prefer cropping from large files or mainly take selfies and landscapes — the V70 FE will suffice.

Performance — Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Dimensity 7360 Turbo

Vivo V70 is powered by Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 — the latest Qualcomm chip manufactured using a 4 nm process. In the AnTuTu benchmark, it scores over 1.48 million points, placing it well above typical mid-range devices. The Adreno 722 GPU allows for playing Genshin Impact and PUBG at high settings. The UFS 4.1 storage means faster read and write speeds — applications launch noticeably smoother than on UFS 3.1.

Vivo V70 FE features Dimensity 7360 Turbo — a solid but slower processor. In everyday use — browsing, social media, navigation — the difference is negligible. The gap widens in gaming and multitasking. It has UFS 3.1 and LPDDR5 (without X), which is an earlier generation.

Both models have a VC (Vapor Chamber) cooling system and run on Android 16 with the OriginOS 6 overlay. The manufacturer promises 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. Shared additional features include infrared port (IR), NFC, and Bluetooth 5.4 — the V70 adds Wi-Fi 7 to this.

Battery — 6500 vs 7000 mAh

Both models use silicon-carbon (Si/C) cells, which are denser in energy than traditional lithium-polymer ones. The 90 W FlashCharge charges the battery from 0 to 100% in about an hour in both cases.

V70 FE wins in capacity — 7000 mAh is one of the largest batteries in the segment. The portal GSMArena awarded it a result of over 67 hours of endurance. With moderate use, that’s over two days without charging.

V70 with a 6500 mAh battery also performs very well — it easily lasts a whole day of intensive use. The smaller capacity is compensated by a more energy-efficient Snapdragon processor and a smaller display.

To charge both models, you need a USB-C cable and a wall charger with a minimum power of 90 W. For longer trips, it’s worth getting a power bank.

Vivo V70 and V70 FE Display

Both panels are 1.5K AMOLED with 120 Hz refresh rate and HDR10+, but they differ in details.

V70 has a smaller screen of 6.59 inches, but it is brighter — the peak brightness reaches 5000 nits, which is a flagship-level result. Schott Xensation Core glass protects the display.

V70 FE offers a larger screen of 6.83 inches with a brightness of 1900 nits — still readable in sunlight, but the difference in direct comparison to the V70 is noticeable. The 10-bit panel displays a billion colors in the P3 color gamut.

Good to know: If you often use your phone outdoors, the 5000 nits in the V70 makes a huge difference in readability in direct sunlight.

Design and Durability

Vivo V70 is compact — 157.5 x 74.3 mm and weighs only 187 g. The aluminum frame with a glass or plastic back (depending on the variant) makes it feel secure in hand. Available colors are Golden Hour (sunset gradient) and Alpine Gray.

Vivo V70 FE is the Fashion Edition — 163.7 x 76.2 mm and 200 g. It features Darkness Glow technology: the back panel in the Muse Purple variant absorbs light and glows in the dark, changing color. Ocean Blue has similar luminescent properties. Despite the 7000 mAh battery, the casing is only 7.6 mm thick.

Both models have an IP68 + IP69 certification — complete dust resistance and immersion resistance up to 1.5 m. IP69 means additional resistance to water under pressure — a rarity in this price range. Nevertheless, it is worth securing the device — cases and accessories for Vivo V protect the AMOLED display from scratches, which the IP certification does not help with.

Price of Vivo V70 and V70 FE in Poland

The difference is one thousand złoty — and that is the key question: is the ZEISS telephoto lens, faster processor, and brighter screen worth an additional 1000 zł?

For comparison with the competition:

According to the portal GSMManiak, both models are available in Polish stores (Media Expert, RTV Euro AGD, Neonet) with promotional prices at launch.

Which one to choose? Vivo V70 or V70 FE

Choose Vivo V70 if:
– You take a lot of photos and need a telephoto lens (portraits, sports, concerts)
– You care about the best gaming performance
– You prefer a compact smartphone (6.59″, 187 g)
– Screen brightness is important to you (5000 nits)

Choose Vivo V70 FE if:
– Battery life is a priority (7000 mAh)
– You prefer a larger screen (6.83 inches)
– You want to save 1000 PLN
– You don’t need a telephoto lens — digital zoom from a 200 MP sensor is enough for you

Our choice: For most users, Vivo V70 FE for 1799 PLN (on promotion) offers a better value for money. The telephoto lens in V70 is great, but the additional 900 PLN is a significant expense if you’re not a photography enthusiast.

Summary

Vivo V70 and V70 FE are two well-thought-out smartphones targeting different needs. V70 is aimed at photographers — a triple ZEISS camera with a 3x periscope telephoto lens and Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 for 3099 PLN. V70 FE focuses on durability — 7000 mAh, 200 MP sensor, and Darkness Glow casing for 2099 PLN.

Both models share an IP68/IP69 certification, 90 W fast charging, Android 16, and solid build quality. Regardless of your choice, it’s worth taking care of protection — check out Vivo smartphone accessories at homescreen.pl.

FAQ

How much does the Vivo V70 cost in Poland?

The official price of the Vivo V70 in Poland is 3099 PLN for the 8/512 GB variant. In a promotional launch, the price drops to 2699 PLN. The V70 FE model costs 2099 PLN (promo 1799 PLN) for the 8/256 GB variant.

What is the difference between the Vivo V70 and V70 FE?

The V70 has a faster processor (Snapdragon 7 Gen 4), a triple ZEISS camera with a 3x periscope telephoto lens, and a brighter screen (5000 vs 1900 nits). The V70 FE offers a larger battery (7000 vs 6500 mAh), a higher camera resolution (200 vs 50 MP), and a lower price.

Does the Vivo V70 have a telephoto lens?

Yes — the Vivo V70 has a 50 MP periscope telephoto lens with ZEISS optics and 3x optical zoom. It is one of the few mid-range phones with a telephoto lens in this price class. The V70 FE model does not have a telephoto lens.

Which model has a better camera?

It depends on the photography style. The Vivo V70 wins in versatility — ZEISS telephoto lens, better 4K@60fps video, and ZEISS optics on all lenses. The V70 FE offers a higher resolution of 200 MP, which provides more detail in good light and better digital zoom.

Are the Vivo V70 and V70 FE waterproof?

Yes — both models have an IP68 certification (submersion up to 1.5 m) and IP69 (resistance to water under pressure). This is one of the highest resistance standards in the mid-range segment.

The best multimedia screen film for cars is GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection in ceramic version (from 109.99 PLN) — it protects the display from scratches, maintains full touch responsiveness, and does not alter image colors. For drivers who are bothered by sunlight reflections, the matte version with an anti-reflective filter will be better. In our ranking, we included films for car screens dedicated to specific models with precise laser cuts.

Multimedia screens in modern cars have increasingly larger diagonals — from 9 to even 17 inches. At the same time, they are exposed to scratches from rings, nails, and keys. Replacing a damaged display at an authorized service center costs around 3,000–8,000 PLN.

A protective film for the screen for a fraction of that cost solves the problem for several years. In this article, we compare the best car screen films available in 2026, test the differences between the ceramic and matte variants, and suggest which film for a car display will work best in your vehicle.

Why is it worth protecting the multimedia screen in a car?

Car displays operate under much harsher conditions than smartphone screens. They are exposed to large temperature fluctuations — from freezing in winter to over 60°C in summer under the sun. Additionally, you handle them while wearing gloves, with dirty hands after refueling, or with shopping bags in your hands.

A scratched multimedia screen not only looks worse but also makes it difficult to read navigation and information from the onboard computer. In premium cars, where the infotainment system costs several thousand zlotys, a protective film for the screen is a cheap insurance policy.

A car display film also provides additional benefits:

• Reduction of sun glare (matte versions)
• Protection against fingerprints and greasy stains
• Maintaining the car’s value when reselling or returning a lease
• Easier screen cleaning thanks to the oleophobic coating
• Protection against overheating — ceramic film filters some UV radiation

Types of protective films for car screens

Before you move on to the ranking of multimedia screen films, it’s worth understanding the differences between the available types. Each variant has its strengths and will work in different situations — just like with protective films for smartphone screens, the choice depends on your priorities.

Ceramic film

Ceramic film is a solution for those who want screen protection without changing the appearance of the display. The ceramic layer effectively absorbs impacts and scratches while maintaining 100% clarity and natural colors. The touch remains just as responsive as on a bare screen.

Ceramic film for multimedia screens is particularly suitable for cars with high-quality OLED or AMOLED displays, where you care about accurate color reproduction — for example, in navigation systems with satellite views. This is the most commonly chosen type of protective film for screens in new cars.

Matte film (anti-glare)

Matte film for screens is the choice for drivers who often drive on sunny days. The surface with an anti-reflective filter eliminates light reflections, ensuring that navigation and multimedia remain readable even in bright sunlight. An additional plus — the matte texture reduces the visibility of fingerprints.

The disadvantage of matte film is a slight dulling of the image. Colors lose some saturation, and fine details on the map may be minimally less sharp. In practice, the difference is mainly noticeable when directly compared to a bare screen. Matte film on a car screen works best in SUVs with panoramic roofs and convertibles.

PPF Film (Paint Protection Film)

PPF film on the screen is a premium solution, mainly known for protecting car paint. It has self-healing properties — minor scratches disappear under the influence of heat. It is thicker than ceramic and matte films, which translates to better mechanical protection of the display.

It is worth knowing that not every PPF film is suitable for touch screens. Choose only variants designed for car displays that maintain touch responsiveness and do not interfere with sensor operation. PPF film for multimedia screens usually costs more than ceramic variants but offers the highest durability.

What to pay attention to when choosing a film for a car screen?

When purchasing protective film for a multimedia screen, check a few key parameters. Choosing the right film for a car display ensures that the protection will be effective and will not worsen the comfort of using the screen.

• Fit for the model — the film for the car screen must be precisely cut for your display. Universal films cut with scissors never fit as well as those made with dedicated laser cutters.
• Thickness — thinner films (0.1–0.15 mm) are less noticeable to the touch, while thicker ones (0.2+ mm) provide better mechanical protection.
• Oleophobic coating — repels grease and makes it easier to clean the multimedia screen from fingerprints.
• Touch responsiveness — check if the manufacturer guarantees 100% sensitivity of the touch screen.
• Installation kit — a good protective film for the screen should include a cloth, squeegee, and cleaning solution.
• Surface hardness — films with a hardness of 9H provide protection against scratches from keys and coins.

Tip: Before applying the film to the multimedia screen, turn off the engine and wait for the display to cool to room temperature. A warm screen makes precise application difficult and can cause air bubbles.

Ranking of Multimedia Screen Films 2026

Below we present the best protective films for car screens available at homescreen.pl in the category car accessories. All products are from the GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection series — the only brand with dedicated laser-cut templates for over 6,000 car models. Therefore, in our ranking of multimedia screen films, we focus specifically on this series.

1. GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection ceramic for Audi Q3 (2025–2026) — 199.99 zł

Best premium protection — ceramic film dedicated to the new Audi Q3 with a large 10.1 inch MMI multimedia screen. The ceramic layer provides effective protection against scratches without altering the display colors. The flexible material perfectly adheres to the curved panel.

The GrizzGlass ceramic technology is distinguished by the absence of optical distortions. The image on the screen looks identical to that without the film — which you will especially appreciate in the MMI system with high-resolution graphics. The higher price results from the larger protective area covering the climate control panel.

2. GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection ceramic for VW T-Roc 2 12.9″ (2025–2026) — 129.99 zł

The best film for the car screen from the VAG group — the new second-generation T-Roc features an impressive 12.9-inch display. The ceramic film protects it from scratches during everyday use while maintaining full brightness and color saturation.

The precise laser cut ensures a perfect fit of the film to the shape of the multimedia screen — without the need for self-trimming. The installation kit included makes application easy even for those without experience in applying protective films.

3. GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection matte for Tesla Model Y Juniper — rear screen (2024–2025) — 129.99 zł

The best matte film for Tesla screen — the rear screen in the refreshed Model Y Juniper is particularly prone to dirt from passengers. The matte surface effectively reduces glare and fingerprints, which will be especially appreciated by children using the multimedia screen in the back seat.

Tesla is a car where the display serves as the control center — from air conditioning to opening the trunk. A protective film for the screen is an absolute necessity here. GrizzGlass offers films for both the front and rear displays of Tesla in all generations.

4. GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection ceramic for BMW 7 G11/G12 10.25″ (2015–2023) — 119.99 zł

Ceramic film dedicated to the iDrive screen in the BMW 7 series. The 10.25 inch format is one of the most popular sizes of car displays in BMW vehicles — the same film for the multimedia screen fits many models with the iDrive 7 system. The ceramic material does not affect the operation of gestures and multi-touch.

The BMW 7 series is a premium segment car, where a scratched screen lowers the resale value of the vehicle. A protective film for the screen for 119.99 zł is a minimal investment compared to replacing the display for several thousand zł in an authorized service.

5. GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection matte for Skoda Scala 9.2″ Amundsen (2019–2023) — 109.99 zł

Matte film for the Amundsen 9.2 inch system screen in Skoda Scala — one of the cheapest films in the ranking. The anti-reflective surface ensures that navigation is readable even in bright sunlight coming through the windshield. This is a great film for the car screen for drivers who travel a lot.

Skoda is a brand where the Columbus and Amundsen multimedia screens have gained recognition for their intuitiveness. The matte film for the car display does not change the way of operation — the touch works exactly the same as on a bare screen. Installation takes literally a few minutes thanks to precise fitting.

6. GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection matte for Android 2DIN 7″ radio — 109.99 zł

If you have replaced your factory radio with an Android station, this screen protection film is for you. The universal size of 7 inches fits popular 2DIN radio models installed in Fords, Volkswagens, Skodas, Seats, and Opels. The matte surface protects the multimedia screen and reduces glare.

Android radios are a popular upgrade for older cars — they add Google Maps navigation, Android Auto, and multimedia. However, the touchscreen in such radios is prone to scratches, as there is no factory protection like that used by OEM manufacturers. The film for the car display effectively and cheaply solves this problem.

Comparison of multimedia screen films — summary table

Ceramic or matte — which film for the car screen to choose?

The choice between ceramic and matte film depends on your priorities. Both versions of GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection protect the multimedia screen equally effectively — the difference lies in the finish of the protective film surface on the screen.

Ceramic film for multimedia screen — choose this if you care about the best image quality. It works well in cars with vibrant color screens, such as new Audi, Mercedes, or BMW with OLED displays. It’s also a better choice if you often use the rearview camera — the image remains crystal clear.

Matte film for car screen — choose this if you drive a lot on the road and the sun bothers you. Ideal for Tesla (large screens close to windows), SUVs with panoramic roofs, and cars used by families with children. The matte surface is also easier to keep clean on a daily basis.

How to install film on multimedia screen — step by step

Installing a protective film on a car screen is easier than applying film on a smartphone. Dedicated laser cutters eliminate the most difficult stage — trimming. Here’s a five-step guide:

1. Turn off the engine and wait — the screen should be at room temperature. A warm car display causes air bubbles under the film.
2. Clean the multimedia screen — use the cloth from the kit and cleaning solution. Remove every speck of dust — it will be visible under the film.
3. Remove the protective layer — carefully peel the film from the backing, holding it by the edges. Do not touch the adhesive side.
4. Apply from the top edge — align the film with the top edge of the screen and slowly lower it, smoothing it with a squeegee from the center to the sides.
5. Remove bubbles — gently push out any remaining air bubbles with the squeegee towards the nearest edge of the screen.

Note: Do not use alcohol-based cleaners on car screens — they can damage the anti-reflective coating of the factory display. Only use products designed for LCD/OLED screens.

How to take care of the protective film on the car screen?

After installing the film on the multimedia screen, it is worth following a few rules that will extend its lifespan. Proper care of the film on the car display ensures that it retains its protective properties for a full 2–3 years.

• Cleaning — use a soft microfiber cloth. Avoid paper towels, which can scratch the surface of the protective film on the screen.
• Products — use only LCD/OLED screen cleaners, without alcohol and ammonia. Available at any electronics store.
• Sunshade — when parking in the sun, use a sunshade for the windshield. This protects both the film on the car screen and the entire interior from overheating.
• Nails and rings — the film on the multimedia screen protects against scratches, but sharp edges of jewelry can damage it with overly aggressive handling.

For which cars are multimedia screen films available?

The CarDisplay Protection series includes dedicated protective films for multimedia screens for over 6,000 car models. In the offer of homescreen.pl you will find films for cars of the following brands:

• German: BMW, Audi, Volkswagen, Mercedes
• Czech: Skoda
• American: Tesla, Ford
• Asian: Toyota, Hyundai, Kia
• French: Peugeot, Renault, Citroen
• Swedish and Italian: Volvo, Alfa Romeo, Fiat

If you can’t find your model, check the category films for other cars — we regularly add new templates.

Summary — the best film for multimedia screen 2026

A film for the multimedia screen in the car is an inexpensive and effective way to protect one of the most expensive elements of the interior. In our ranking, the best option turned out to be the GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection series — available in ceramic and matte variants, with precise laser cutting and a complete installation kit.

For drivers who value image quality, we recommend the ceramic film for the multimedia screen (from 109.99 PLN). If comfort while driving on sunny days is a priority — the matte film for the car screen with an anti-reflective filter will be a better choice.

Order by 12:00 PM, and the shipment will be sent the next business day.

Check the full offer of protective films for car screens at homescreen.pl →

FAQ — frequently asked questions

Does the film for the multimedia screen affect touch functionality?

No. The GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection films maintain 100% touchscreen responsiveness. Both the ceramic and matte variants are thin enough not to interfere with touch sensitivity or the operation of multi-touch gestures in car navigation systems.

How long does a car screen protective film last?

The film for the car display lasts on average 2–3 years with normal use. The lifespan depends on conditions — frequent temperature changes and intensive use of the multimedia screen can shorten this period. Replacing the protective film on the screen is simple and does not require a visit to a service center.

Can I install the film on the car screen myself?

Yes. All GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection films come with a mounting kit (cloth, squeegee, cleaning solution). Installing the film on the multimedia screen takes 5–10 minutes. The dedicated laser cut eliminates the need for trimming — just apply and smooth it out.

Ceramic or matte film — which is better for the car screen?

The ceramic film for the multimedia screen preserves the original image quality and is better for OLED/AMOLED screens in premium cars. The matte film for the car screen reduces glare and fingerprints — it works well when driving on sunny days. Both protect the display equally effectively from scratches.

Is a film on the car screen legal?

Yes. Protective films for multimedia screens are not subject to any legal restrictions, unlike window tinting. You can freely install a film on the car display without worrying about fines or issues with the technical inspection.

How much does a film for a multimedia screen cost?

GrizzGlass CarDisplay Protection films cost from 109.99 PLN to 199.99 PLN depending on the car model and screen size. This is a fraction of the cost of replacing a scratched car display at a service center, which can reach 3,000–8,000 PLN.