Category: Guides

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs iPad Air 11 — which tablet to choose in 2026?

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro wins on specifications for less: 11.2″ 144 Hz 3.2K display, 9,200 mAh, and Snapdragon 8 Elite for 2,599 PLN. iPad Air 11 with M4 chip and iPadOS 26 (from 2,899 PLN) wins on pro apps, Apple ecosystem, and support for 6–7 years. Below is a full comparison with recommendations for every type of user.

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs iPad Air 11 — comparison at a glance

Parameter	Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro	iPad Air 11 (M4)
Screen	11.2″, IPS, 144 Hz, 800 nits	11″, Liquid Retina IPS, 60 Hz, 500 nits
Resolution	3200 × 2136 (345 ppi), Dolby Vision	2360 × 1640 (264 ppi), True Tone
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)	Apple M4 (3 nm), 9-core GPU
RAM / storage	8 / 12 GB + 256 / 512 GB UFS 4.1	12 GB + 128 GB / 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB
Battery	9,200 mAh	28.93 Wh (~7,606 mAh)
Charging	67 W (wired)	~20 W (USB-C PD)
Cameras	50 MP rear + 32 MP front	12 MP rear + 12 MP Center Stage
Speakers	4× Dolby Atmos	2× stereo (landscape)
Wi-Fi / BT	Wi-Fi 7 / BT 5.4	Wi-Fi 7 / BT 5.3
Weight	485 g	464 g
Dimensions	251.2 × 173.4 × 5.75 mm	247.6 × 178.5 × 6.1 mm
Biometrics	Fingerprint reader in the button + 2D face unlock	Touch ID in the button
System	Android 16 + HyperOS 3	iPadOS 26
Stylus	Xiaomi Focus Pen	Apple Pencil Pro / Pencil (USB-C)
Price (starting)	2,599 PLN (8/256 GB)	2,899 PLN (128 GB Wi-Fi)

Our choice in terms of quality to price: Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro — for 300 PLN less you get a better screen, larger battery, and faster charging.

Our choice for iPhone / Mac users: iPad Air 11 — a seamless ecosystem, longer system support, and better pro apps.

Display — where Xiaomi clearly wins

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro has an 11.2″ display with a resolution of 3200 × 2136 pixels (345 ppi) with a refresh rate of 144 Hz. iPad Air 11 features an 11″ Liquid Retina at 2360 × 1640 pixels (264 ppi) with a refresh rate of 60 Hz.

The difference in refresh rate is noticeable in everyday scrolling and gaming. 144 Hz in Xiaomi provides smoothness unavailable in any iPad below the Pro model. Apple maintains 60 Hz across the entire Air line and offers full ProMotion 120 Hz only in iPad Pro models.

Xiaomi also has an advantage in brightness (800 nits vs 500 nits) and supports Dolby Vision with 12-bit color depth. Apple only offers True Tone. However, Xiaomi lacks a matte anti-reflective coating.

Tip: If you plan to draw or take notes with a stylus, consider getting a matte film for the iPad that reduces reflections and gives the feeling of writing on paper — check out accessories for iPad Air 11.

Conclusion about the display: Xiaomi wins on specifications (resolution, refresh rate, HDR, brightness). The iPad Air, however, has better out-of-the-box color calibration and support for full P3.

Processor and Performance — M4 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Showdown

Apple M4 and Snapdragon 8 Elite are the two most powerful chips in tablets from 2026. Both are made using a 3 nm process, with differences in architecture and software.

Apple M4 excels in single-core synthetic benchmarks and is optimized for pro applications: Procreate, LumaFusion, DaVinci Resolve, Affinity Designer. Apps on iPadOS are designed with a single chip in mind, so they run flawlessly.

Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro offers greater flexibility: console emulation, multitasking, desktop mode, and compatibility with Office files without hassle. In AnTuTu 10, it scores over 2,800,000 points — a result on par with flagship smartphones.

Test (approximate result)	Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro	iPad Air 11 (M4)
Geekbench 6 single-core	~3,100	~3,700
Geekbench 6 multi-core	~9,800	~14,500
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	~6,400	~5,200
AnTuTu 10	~2,800,000	n/a (iOS)

In practice: both tablets will handle any game and application without a hitch. The iPad is faster in video export and 3D rendering. Xiaomi performs better with AAA games and emulation (Nintendo Switch, PS2) thanks to the Adreno 830.

Battery and charging — Xiaomi’s advantage

The battery 9,200 mAh in the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs 28.93 Wh (approx. 7,606 mAh) in the iPad Air. Xiaomi charges at 67 W, while Apple is limited to ~20 W via USB-C PD.

In real-world usage, the difference is:
– Xiaomi: 0 → 100% in about 96 minutes, 50% in 38 minutes
– iPad Air 11: 0 → 100% in about 150 minutes

The battery life on both tablets is comparable — about 10 hours in internet browsing and video streaming tests. Xiaomi compensates for what it loses on the less optimized Android with a larger battery.

Note: Apple does NOT include a full-power charger in the box. To charge the iPad in a reasonable time, you need a GaN charger of at least 30 W with a USB-C port. Check the charging offer at homescreen.pl.

Cameras — who even uses them on a tablet?

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: 50 MP f/1.8 (rear) + 32 MP (front, ultra-wide).
iPad Air 11: 12 MP f/1.8 (rear) + 12 MP (front, in landscape, with Center Stage).

Xiaomi wins on paper, but the camera on a tablet is mainly used for scanning documents and video conferencing. Here the iPad has a better front camera setup — placed on the longer side (landscape), perfect for Zoom and Google Meet when holding the tablet horizontally with a keyboard.

Xiaomi has a front camera in portrait mode, which forces a strange frame during video conferencing.

System — Android 16 + HyperOS 3 vs iPadOS 26

This is the most important difference between these tablets — and it determines whether it’s even worth considering Xiaomi.

iPadOS 26 is a mature system designed for tablets: Stage Manager, support for external monitors, pro apps (Adobe, Autodesk, Procreate, LumaFusion). Apple guarantees 6–7 years of updates — an iPad from 5 years ago still receives the latest iPadOS.

HyperOS 3 on Android 16 in Xiaomi is a system written for phones, adapted for tablets. Multitasking and desktop mode work well, but some apps (streaming, banking) can be poorly adapted to large screens. Xiaomi guarantees 4 years of Android updates and 6 years of security patches.

What Xiaomi does better:
– Full Microsoft Office without iCloud/iPadOS restrictions
– Compatibility with .exe/.apk files through emulators
– Desktop mode with a taskbar and windows
– No App Store tax — most apps are free

What iPad does better:
– Creative apps (Procreate, LumaFusion, Affinity)
– Integration with Mac/iPhone (Handoff, Universal Clipboard, AirDrop)
– Longer system support (6–7 years vs 4 years)
– Consistency of the interface across the system

Stylus and keyboard — what each ecosystem offers

The iPad Air 11 works with Apple Pencil Pro and Apple Pencil (USB-C) as well as the original Magic Keyboard. It is a mature set with haptic feedback and precision that has been lacking in other ecosystems for years.

Xiaomi offers its own Focus Pen (8,192 pressure levels, magnetic charging) and Focus Keyboard often included in the package. Functionally, it is closer to the Apple Pencil 2nd generation — for significantly less.

Case and protection are a must for tablets costing over 2,500 PLN. You can find the full range of accessories in the categories: Xiaomi Pad 8 / 8 Pro → | iPad Air 11 →.

Price — where the difference makes the biggest impact

Configuration	Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro	iPad Air 11
128–256 GB Wi-Fi	2,599 PLN (8/256 GB)	2,899 PLN (128 GB) / 3,399 PLN (256 GB)
512 GB Wi-Fi	2,999 PLN (12/512 GB)	4,399 PLN
1 TB Wi-Fi	n/a	5,399 PLN
LTE / 5G	n/a (Wi-Fi only)	+800 PLN for Cellular
Stylus	~350 PLN (Focus Pen)	399 PLN (Pencil USB-C) / 599 PLN (Pencil Pro)
Keyboard	~599 PLN (or in a bundle)	~1,599 PLN (Magic Keyboard)

For the same price (~3,500 PLN) you get:
– Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 12/512 GB + Focus Pen + case with keyboard.
– Just the iPad Air 11 256 GB Wi-Fi (without stylus and keyboard).

The difference becomes even greater if you need LTE — the iPad Air adds 800 PLN for the Cellular module, while Xiaomi doesn’t have that option at all (requires a hotspot from a phone).

Which tablet to choose? Recommendations based on needs

Choose Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro if:

You have a budget of up to 3,000 PLN and want maximum specifications for that price.
You watch a lot of videos and play games — the 144 Hz 3.2K Dolby Vision screen and 4 Dolby Atmos speakers will make a difference.
You use Android on your phone — synchronization works more smoothly.
You want to take notes with a stylus and have a keyboard included.
You need a large battery and fast charging (67 W).

Choose iPad Air 11 if:

You have an iPhone or Mac — the Apple ecosystem is the biggest added value.
You work on pro apps: Procreate, Affinity, LumaFusion, DaVinci Resolve.
You want the longest system support (6–7 years of updates).
You need a variant with LTE/5G.
You value a cohesive system and don’t want to deal with stores and sideloading.

Our verdict: For 70% of users looking for a tablet for learning, entertainment, and simple office work, Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is the smarter choice — it offers more for less money. The iPad Air 11 is worth the extra 300–500 PLN only if you are already in the Apple ecosystem or use apps not available on Android.

What to buy after the purchase? Tablet protection

Regardless of your choice — a case and tempered glass are a must. Repairing the display on both models costs around 1,200–1,800 PLN. Meanwhile, a solid case and tempered glass protect the tablet from 90% of accidental damage for a fraction of that price.

You can find the full range of accessories — cases, tempered glass, matte films, keyboards — in our categories:

Check accessories: Xiaomi Pad 8 / 8 Pro → | iPad Air 11 (2024/2025/2026) →

Summary — Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs iPad Air 11

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs iPad Air 11 is a battle of better hardware versus better software. Xiaomi offers 144 Hz, 9,200 mAh, and 67 W charging for 2,599 PLN. Apple provides the M4 chip, iPadOS 26, and 6–7 years of updates for 2,899 PLN.

If you want the best value for money outside the Apple ecosystem — choose Xiaomi. If you have an iPhone or Mac and need pro apps — pay extra for the iPad. Regardless of your choice: protect your tablet with a case and tempered glass — screen repairs cost 20× more.

FAQ — frequently asked questions

Will the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro be available in LTE / 5G version?

No. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is sold globally only in the Wi-Fi version. If you need mobile internet, you have to use a hotspot from your phone or choose the iPad Air 11 in the Cellular version (+800 PLN).

Which tablet is better for studying and taking notes?

Both tablets are very good for note-taking, but the iPad Air 11 has an advantage in apps (GoodNotes, Notability, Apple Notes). The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro with Focus Pen and keyboard included is cheaper, and Microsoft OneNote and Xiaomi Notes on Android perform excellently.

Does the iPad Air 11 support 144 Hz like Xiaomi?

No. The iPad Air 11 has a 60 Hz display. If you want higher refresh rates from Apple, you need to choose the iPad Pro with ProMotion technology (120 Hz) — which starts at around 5,200 PLN.

Does the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro receive regular updates?

Yes, Xiaomi guarantees 4 years of major Android system updates and 6 years of security updates. The iPad Air 11 typically receives 6–7 years of full iPadOS updates.

Do cases for the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro fit the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro?

Yes — the Xiaomi Pad 7 / 7 Pro / 8 / 8 Pro have nearly identical dimensions of 11.2″. Most cases and screen protectors are compatible with the entire series. Check the exact product description — in the Xiaomi Pad 8 Series category, all products are marked with compatibility.

Does the 2nd generation Apple Pencil work with the iPad Air 11 (M4)?

No. The iPad Air 11 with the M4 chip supports Apple Pencil Pro and Apple Pencil (USB-C). The older 2nd generation Pencil (with inductive charging for iPad Pro 2018–2022) does not work with the new Air.

Which tablet is better for gaming?

For mobile gaming, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is the better choice — Adreno 830 + 144 Hz + 4 Dolby Atmos speakers is an optimal setup for Genshin Impact, PUBG, or Honkai. The iPad Air 11 excels in AAA games ported from Mac (Resident Evil, Death Stranding) and in emulation of older consoles.

2026-05-13

Accessories for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2: 2026 Ranking

The best accessories for the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 are the Bizon Case Watch Adamo (25 PLN) with integrated 9H glass, Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ [2 PACK] (19 PLN) for maximum durability, and Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex [3 PACK] (25 PLN) for runners who value minimal weight.

Below you will find the complete ranking of 9 accessories available in the Home Screen store, divided into three categories: protective cases, tempered glass, and films. Each product is described with parameters, price, and a specific recommendation for whom it will be the best choice.

Why the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 Requires Protective Accessories

The Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 is a watch tailored for marathon runners. According to the official Huawei specification, it has an aerospace-grade titanium case, 2nd generation Kunlun Glass, and a water resistance of 5 ATM with EN13319 certification for diving up to 40 meters. Sounds good, but none of these parameters protect against one specific scenario: the corner of the case hitting the edge of a desk or falling on asphalt during training.

In practice, it is the edges and the display that take the most hits. Repairing a cracked screen at an authorized Huawei service center costs around 500–700 PLN according to the manufacturer’s price list. A ceramic film costs 12.99 PLN, and a case with glass 25 PLN. The ROI on securing the accessory counts after the first drop.

Note: Titanium is harder than steel but prone to scratches. Every abrasion against the buckles of a running backpack, jacket zippers, or stone walls leaves a permanent mark. The Felipe case made of TPU solves this problem for 19 PLN.

Check the full category of accessories for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 →

Best protective cases for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

In the Home Screen store, there are two lines of cases from the Bizon brand, specifically dedicated to the GT Runner 2: Adamo (premium, with integrated glass) and Felipe (slim, with a TPU screen protector). Both protect the titanium case and display, but differ in their protection philosophy and aesthetics.

1. Bizon Case Watch Adamo: premium with tempered glass (25 PLN)

Our selection in the premium protection category

Bizon Case Watch Adamo is a two-part construction made of polycarbonate (PC) with factory-integrated 9H tempered glass. This is a 2-in-1 solution, you buy both a case and screen glass at once, saving a few dozen zlotys compared to purchasing both products separately.

Specifications:
– Frame material: polycarbonate (PC)
– Screen protection: 9H tempered glass included
– Weight: approx. 8 g
– Variants: silver-orange, transparent-red, transparent-orange, transparent-blue

For whom: For runners who want one solution instead of two, a protective frame and glass. The silver-orange variant matches perfectly with the Dawn Orange color, and the blue with Dusk Blue.

2. Bizon Case Watch Felipe: with a TPU screen protector (19 zł)

Best price for full 360° protection

Bizon Case Watch Felipe is a monolithic TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) case with a factory-built screen protector. The absence of hard joints means there are no critical points where the case could break upon impact. Touch sensitivity is preserved despite the TPU layer on the display.

Specification:
– Material: TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane)
– Screen protection: integrated TPU protector
– Slightly raised edges (raised edges)
– Variants: silver, pink, gold, transparent, blue, black (6 colors)

For whom: For trail runners and those training in difficult terrain. Soft TPU absorbs impact energy better than hard polycarbonate, thus providing better protection against stones on the running trail. Six color variants offer a lot of stylistic flexibility.

Comparison of Adamo vs Felipe cases

Parameter	Bizon Adamo	Bizon Felipe
Price	25 PLN	19 PLN
Material	Polycarbonate (PC)	TPU
Screen protection	9H tempered glass	TPU shield
Construction	Two-piece	Monolithic
Number of color variants	4	6
Best for	Daily use + training	Trail running + impacts

Advice: If you plan to wear the watch mainly at work and for light training, choose Adamo (the hard glass on the screen withstands daily abrasions). If you run in forests, on stones, and in difficult terrain, opt for Felipe (TPU absorbs impacts).

The best tempered and hybrid glasses for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

The Kunlun glass on the factory display is exceptionally hard, but not flawless. In practice, every runner notices minor scratches on the screen surface after a year. Tempered or hybrid glass is a sacrificial layer; it will break instead of the original display.

1. Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ Black [2 PACK]: the most durable (19 PLN)

Our choice in the glass category

Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ is a flexible hybrid glass with a black frame that conceals the edges of the display. The hybrid combines the durability of glass with the flexibility of film; it does not crack when bent, unlike classic 9H glass. The package includes two pieces, so you have a spare for replacement after the first damage.

Specification:
– Type: hybrid glass (polycarbonate + glass layer)
– Hardness: 9H (outer layer)
– Frame: black (conceals the edges of the display)
– Set: 2 pieces

For whom: For runners who want maximum durability and are not afraid of minor scratches, hybrid glass withstands more than classic film and does not shatter like 9H. The black frame hides reflections caught by Kunlun Glass.

2. Bizon Glass Watch Clear: classic tempered glass (19 PLN)

Best choice for minimalists

Bizon Glass Watch Clear is a transparent tempered glass without a frame, glued over the entire surface. The absence of black edges makes the Huawei Always-On Display look exactly the same as on the factory display, without the “window” effect.

Specification:
– Type: tempered glass
– Hardness: 9H
– Frameless, full transparency
– Thickness: 0.33 mm

For whom: For those who appreciate a minimalist look and a full display view. Classic 9H glass protects well against scratches but is less resistant to point impacts than hybrid glass.

3. GrizzGlass HybridGlass: the cheapest (13.99 PLN)

Best price in the glass ranking

GrizzGlass HybridGlass is a budget hybrid, combining the flexibility of film with the durability of glass at a price that no other option in the store can beat. There is no 2-in-1 set, but for less than 14 PLN, you protect the screen of Huawei’s titanium flagship.

Specification:
– Type: hybrid glass
– Thickness: 0.2 mm
– No frame, transparent
– Polish brand

For whom: For runners who test various accessories and do not want to invest much in one product. It is also the best choice if you already have a case and are looking for an additional layer of glass at a low price.

Comparison of glasses, table

Glass	Brand	Type	Frame	Set	Price
Glass Flex+ Black [2 PACK]	Tech-Protect	hybrid	black	2 pcs.	19 PLN
Glass Watch Clear	Bizon	tempered 9H	none	1 pc.	19 PLN
HybridGlass	GrizzGlass	hybrid	none	1 pc.	13.99 PLN

Best protective films for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

A film is an alternative to glass, thinner, more flexible, and cheaper. For marathon runners who count every gram, a film is often a better choice than glass because it does not change the ergonomics of the screen and does not affect touch sensitivity.

1. Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex [3 PACK]: best set (25 PLN)

Our selection in the film category

Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex is a self-healing hydrogel film, minor scratches disappear over time thanks to the properties of TPU material. The set includes 3 pieces, so they last for over a year of use even with intense training. The price of one film is 8.33 PLN.

Specification:
– Type: hydrogel film (HydroFlex)
– Function: self-healing of minor scratches
– Set: 3 pieces
– Thickness: 0.2 mm

For whom: For runners who regularly rub the display against a backpack strap, technical shirt, or headlamp band. Three pieces mean that even after two replacements, you still have a spare.

2. GrizzGlass CeramicFilm: the cheapest ceramic protection (12.99 PLN)

Best price in the film ranking

GrizzGlass CeramicFilm is a film with a ceramic layer, harder than standard TPU film, but still flexible. A great alternative for those who prefer the durability of ceramics but do not want the rigidity of classic tempered glass.

Specification:
– Type: ceramic film
– Hardness: comparable to 7–8H
– Thickness: 0.2 mm
– Polish brand

For whom: For budget-conscious users who want to combine affordability with good protective parameters. The cheapest in the entire store, and the parameters match those of more expensive hybrid films.

3. GrizzGlass PaperScreen: matte film for runners in the sun (13.99 PLN)

Best in strong sunlight and rain

GrizzGlass PaperScreen is a matte film with a “paper-like” effect, eliminating light reflections and fingerprints. This makes a huge difference during training on a sunny day when you need to quickly check your pace or heart rate.

Specification:
– Type: matte film (anti-reflective)
– Finish: matte, paper-like to the touch
– Thickness: 0.2 mm
– Glare reduction: up to 80%

For whom: For marathon runners and triathletes who train outdoors. The matte surface provides a readable screen even in direct sunlight. Downside: slightly reduces the color saturation of the Always-On Display. Reviews like the review by Komputer Świat confirm that the peak brightness of 3000 nits is sufficient even without the matte film, but readability clearly improves in full midday sun.

Film comparison, table

Film	Brand	Type	Set	Price per unit	Price
HydroFlex [3 PACK]	Bizon	hydrogel	3 pcs.	8.33 zł	25 zł
CeramicFilm	GrizzGlass	ceramic	1 pc.	12.99 zł	12.99 zł
PaperScreen	GrizzGlass	matte	1 pc.	13.99 zł	13.99 zł
Watch Film Matte Duo [2 PACK]	Bizon	matte	2 pcs.	14.50 zł	29 zł

Complete comparison of the 9 best accessories

Accessory	Category	Brand	Price	Best for
Bizon Case Watch Adamo	Case with glass	Bizon	25 PLN	Daily use + office
Bizon Case Watch Felipe	Case with cover	Bizon	19 PLN	Trail running
Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ [2 PACK]	Hybrid glass	Tech-Protect	19 PLN	Maximum durability
Bizon Glass Watch Clear	Tempered glass	Bizon	19 PLN	Minimalist look
GrizzGlass HybridGlass	Hybrid glass	GrizzGlass	13.99 PLN	Budget hybrid
Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex [3 PACK]	Hydrogel film	Bizon	25 PLN	Intensive training
GrizzGlass CeramicFilm	Ceramic film	GrizzGlass	12.99 PLN	Best price
GrizzGlass PaperScreen	Matte film	GrizzGlass	13.99 PLN	Training in the sun
Bizon Watch Film Matte Duo [2 PACK]	Matte film	Bizon	29 PLN	Anti-glare + spare

How to choose accessories for your running style

The choice of accessory depends on three variables: where you run, how long you train, and whether you wear a watch outside of running. Below are practical scenarios.

Running on asphalt and in the city: The Bizon Adamo case (with 9H glass) is sufficient. Asphalt rarely leaves deep scratches, but a fall onto a curb can damage the corner of the case. The dual-layer construction of PC + glass protects both the frame and the display.

Trail routes and mountain runs: The Bizon Felipe case with soft TPU. Stones and roots can be merciless, and TPU absorbs impact energy better than hard polycarbonate. Plus, 6 color variants, the orange case provides additional visibility on the trail.

Marathons and ultramarathons: A thin film (HydroFlex 3 PACK or PaperScreen) instead of a case. Every gram counts during a 42 km run, and the film practically does not change the ergonomics of the watch. The hydrogel HydroFlex regenerates minor scratches, so you don’t have to replace it after every workout.

Triathlon and swimming: Only film, no case. Cases can trap water at the seals of the case, making it difficult to synchronize the sensors with the body. The ceramic film GrizzGlass CeramicFilm or Glass Flex+ does not affect touch detection in water.

Daily use + office: The Adamo case (premium look) plus the tempered glass Bizon Glass Watch Clear (frameless, full display view). This combination provides 360° protection without visual compromises.

Tip: If you are buying accessories for the first time, start with the combination of Felipe case + HydroFlex 3 PACK film (total 44 PLN). This is a complete starter set with a year’s supply for use.

What else is worth buying for the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

The Home Screen store offers accessories dedicated to the GT Runner 2, but there are also universal products that can come in handy. The watch has a standard 22 mm strap mount, so straps from the watch strap category fit it. If you are considering an upgrade to a newer model, check the categories Huawei Watch GT 6 or Huawei Watch Ultimate.

Owners of older models can take a look at accessories for the Huawei Watch GT 5 and Huawei Watch GT 4, as some straps are interchangeable between models. A complete list of accessories for all Huawei smartwatch models can be found in the Other Watch / Band category.

Summary of what to buy first

The best single investment in protecting the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 is the Bizon Case Watch Adamo case (25 PLN), which combines a protective frame with 9H tempered glass. The second place goes to the Bizon Case Watch Felipe case (19 PLN) for those training in difficult terrain.

If you prefer minimalism, go for just the Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ [2 PACK] (19 PLN), two pieces for the price of one at competitors, hybrid technology. For marathon runners, the optimal choice is the Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex [3 PACK] (25 PLN) with self-repairing functionality.

All the mentioned products are available at the Home Screen store with next business day shipping (for orders placed by 12:00 PM). Free shipping for orders over 100 PLN and 30 days for returns.

Check the full range of accessories for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 →

FAQ, frequently asked questions about accessories for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

What accessories fit Huawei Watch GT Runner 2?

Dedicated Bizon cases (Adamo and Felipe), tempered glass from Bizon, Tech-Protect, and GrizzGlass, as well as protective films from Bizon and GrizzGlass fit the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2. The watch also has a standard 22 mm strap mount, so universal straps of that width are compatible.

Is tempered glass better than a film for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2?

Tempered glass provides better protection against point impacts (e.g., contact with a stone), while the film is thinner, lighter, and more flexible. For marathon runners, the film is better (less weight), while for trail runners, the Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ hybrid glass offers a compromise between flexibility and hardness.

How much does it cost to repair Huawei Watch GT Runner 2?

The repair of a cracked display for the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 at an authorized service center costs around 500–700 PLN. Protective cases start at 19 PLN, and screen protectors at 12.99 PLN, so investing in protection pays off after the first avoided fall.

What size is the strap for the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2?

The Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 uses a strap with a width of 22 mm with a standard quick-release attachment. You can replace the original strap with any other 22 mm strap, whether silicone, leather, Milanese, or nylon.

Do the Bizon Adamo and Felipe cases fit other Huawei Watch models?

No, the Bizon Case Watch Adamo and Felipe are specifically designed for the dimensions of the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 (45.9 × 43.5 × 10.7 mm). For other Huawei Watch models (GT 4, GT 5, GT 6, Ultimate), you need dedicated cases from the appropriate categories.

Does the ceramic film make touch usage difficult?

No, the GrizzGlass CeramicFilm has a thickness of 0.2 mm and does not noticeably affect the touch sensitivity of the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2. The Always-On Display feature and all gestures (swipes, taps) work normally.

Which accessory should I buy if I have a limited budget?

If you have less than 25 PLN, the best investment is GrizzGlass CeramicFilm (12.99 PLN), a ceramic film that protects the screen from scratches and point impacts at the lowest price in the store. If your budget allows for 25 PLN, go for the Bizon Adamo case (case + 2-in-1 glass).

2026-04-29

Accessories for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2: 2026 Ranking

Below you will find a complete ranking of 9 accessories available in the Home Screen store, divided into three categories: protective cases, tempered glass, and films. Each product is described with parameters, price, and a specific recommendation for whom it will be the best choice.

Why the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 Requires Protective Accessories

The Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 is a watch tailored for marathon runners. According to the official Huawei specification, it has an aerospace-grade titanium case, second-generation Kunlun Glass, and a water resistance of 5 ATM with EN13319 certification for diving up to 40 meters. Sounds good, but none of these parameters protect against one specific scenario: the corner of the case hitting the edge of a desk or falling onto asphalt during training.

In practice, it is the edges and the display that take the most hits. Repairing a cracked screen at an authorized Huawei service center costs around 500–700 PLN according to the manufacturer’s price list. A ceramic film costs 12.99 PLN, and a case with glass 25 PLN. The ROI from securing the accessory is therefore counted after the first drop.

Note: Titanium is harder than steel but prone to scratches. Every abrasion against the buckles of a running backpack, jacket zippers, or stone walls leaves a permanent mark. The Felipe case made of TPU solves this problem for 19 PLN.

Check the full category of accessories for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 →

The Best Protective Cases for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

In the Home Screen store, there are two lines of cases from the Bizon brand, specifically designed for the GT Runner 2: Adamo (premium, with integrated glass) and Felipe (slim, with a TPU screen protector). Both protect the titanium case and display, but differ in their protection philosophy and aesthetics.

1. Bizon Case Watch Adamo: premium with tempered glass (25 PLN)

Our choice in the premium protection category

Bizon Case Watch Adamo is a two-part construction made of polycarbonate (PC) with factory-integrated 9H tempered glass. This is a 2-in-1 solution, you buy both the case and the screen glass at the same time, saving a few dozen zlotys compared to purchasing both products separately.

Specification:
– Frame material: polycarbonate (PC)
– Screen protection: 9H tempered glass included
– Weight: approx. 8 g
– Variants: silver-orange, transparent-red, transparent-orange, transparent-blue

For whom: For runners who want one solution instead of two, a protective frame and glass. The silver-orange variant matches well with the Dawn Orange color, while the blue one goes well with Dusk Blue.

2. Bizon Case Watch Felipe: with a TPU screen protector (19 zł)

Best price for full 360° protection

Specification:
– Material: TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane)
– Screen protection: integrated TPU shield
– Slightly raised edges
– Variants: silver, pink, gold, transparent, blue, black (6 colors)

Comparison of Adamo vs Felipe cases

Parameter	Bizon Adamo	Bizon Felipe
Price	25 PLN	19 PLN
Material	Polycarbonate (PC)	TPU
Screen protection	9H tempered glass	TPU shield
Construction	Two-piece	Monolithic
Number of color variants	4	6
Best for	Daily use + training	Trail running + impacts

Advice: If you plan to wear the watch mainly at work and for light training, choose Adamo (the hard glass on the screen withstands daily abrasions). If you run in forests, on stones, and in difficult terrain, go for Felipe (TPU absorbs impacts).

The best tempered and hybrid glasses for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

1. Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ Black [2 PACK]: the most durable (19 PLN)

Our choice in the glass category

Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ is a flexible hybrid glass with a black frame that masks the edges of the display. The hybrid combines the durability of glass with the flexibility of film, not breaking when bent like classic 9H glass. The package includes two pieces, so you have a spare for replacement after the first damage.

Specification:
– Type: hybrid glass (polycarbonate + glass layer)
– Hardness: 9H (outer layer)
– Frame: black (masks the edges of the display)
– Set: 2 pieces

2. Bizon Glass Watch Clear: classic tempered glass (19 PLN)

Best choice for minimalists

Bizon Glass Watch Clear is a transparent tempered glass without a frame, glued over the entire surface. The absence of black edges makes the Always-On Display of Huawei look exactly the same as on the factory display, without the “window” effect.

Specification:
– Type: tempered glass
– Hardness: 9H
– No frame, full transparency
– Thickness: 0.33 mm

For whom: For those who appreciate a minimalist look and a full view of the display. Classic 9H glass protects well against scratches, but is less resistant to point impacts than hybrid glass.

3. GrizzGlass HybridGlass: the cheapest (13.99 zł)

Best price in the glass ranking

GrizzGlass HybridGlass is a budget hybrid, combining the flexibility of film with the durability of glass at a price that no other option in the store can beat. There is no 2-in-1 set, but for less than 14 zł, you secure the screen of Huawei’s titanium flagship.

Specification:
– Type: hybrid glass
– Thickness: 0.2 mm
– No frame, transparent
– Polish brand

Glass Comparison, Table

Glass	Brand	Type	Frame	Set	Price
Glass Flex+ Black [2 PACK]	Tech-Protect	hybrid	black	2 pcs.	19 zł
Glass Watch Clear	Bizon	tempered 9H	none	1 pc.	19 zł
HybridGlass	GrizzGlass	hybrid	none	1 pc.	13.99 zł

Best Protective Films for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

1. Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex [3 PACK]: best set (25 zł)

Our selection in the film category

Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex is a self-healing hydrogel film, minor scratches disappear over time thanks to the properties of the TPU material. The set includes 3 pieces, so they last for over a year of use even with intense training. The price of one film is 8.33 PLN.

Specification:
– Type: hydrogel film (HydroFlex)
– Function: self-healing of minor scratches
– Set: 3 pieces
– Thickness: 0.2 mm

For whom: For runners who regularly rub the display against a backpack strap, technical shirt, or headlamp band. Three pieces mean that even after two replacements, you still have a spare.

2. GrizzGlass CeramicFilm: the cheapest ceramic protection (12.99 PLN)

Best price in the film ranking

Specification:
– Type: ceramic film
– Hardness: comparable to 7–8H
– Thickness: 0.2 mm
– Polish brand

3. GrizzGlass PaperScreen: matte film for runners in the sun (13.99 zł)

Best in bright sunlight and rain

GrizzGlass PaperScreen is a matte film with a “paper-like” effect, eliminating light reflections and fingerprints. It makes a huge difference during training on a sunny day when you need to quickly check your pace or heart rate.

Specifications:
– Type: matte film (anti-reflective)
– Finish: matte, paper-like to the touch
– Thickness: 0.2 mm
– Glare reduction: up to 80%

For whom: For marathon runners and triathletes who train outdoors. The matte surface provides a readable screen even in direct sunlight. Cons: slightly reduces the color saturation of the Always-On Display. Reviews such as the Komputer Świat editorial test confirm that the peak brightness of 3000 nits is sufficient even without a matte film, but in full midday sun, readability increases significantly.

Film comparison, table

Film	Brand	Type	Set	Price per 1 pc.	Price
HydroFlex [3 PACK]	Bizon	hydrogel	3 pcs.	8.33 zł	25 zł
CeramicFilm	GrizzGlass	ceramic	1 pc.	12.99 zł	12.99 zł
PaperScreen	GrizzGlass	matte	1 pc.	13.99 zł	13.99 zł
Watch Film Matte Duo [2 PACK]	Bizon	matte	2 pcs.	14.50 zł	29 zł

Complete comparison of the 9 best accessories

Accessory	Category	Brand	Price	Best for
Bizon Case Watch Adamo	Case with glass	Bizon	25 PLN	Daily use + office
Bizon Case Watch Felipe	Case with cover	Bizon	19 PLN	Trail running
Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ [2 PACK]	Hybrid glass	Tech-Protect	19 PLN	Maximum durability
Bizon Glass Watch Clear	Tempered glass	Bizon	19 PLN	Minimalist look
GrizzGlass HybridGlass	Hybrid glass	GrizzGlass	13.99 PLN	Budget hybrid
Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex [3 PACK]	Hydrogel film	Bizon	25 PLN	Intense training
GrizzGlass CeramicFilm	Ceramic film	GrizzGlass	12.99 PLN	Best price
GrizzGlass PaperScreen	Matte film	GrizzGlass	13.99 PLN	Training in the sun
Bizon Watch Film Matte Duo [2 PACK]	Matte film	Bizon	29 PLN	Anti-glare + backup

How to choose accessories for your running style

The choice of accessory depends on three variables: where you run, how long you train, and whether you wear a watch outside of running. Below are practical scenarios.

Running on asphalt and in the city: The Bizon Adamo case (with 9H glass) is sufficient. Asphalt rarely leaves deep scratches, but a fall on the curb can damage the corner of the case. The dual-layer construction of PC + glass protects both the frame and the display.

Trail running and mountain runs: The Bizon Felipe case with soft TPU. Stones and roots can be ruthless, and TPU absorbs impact energy better than hard polycarbonate. Plus, there are 6 color variants, the orange case provides extra visibility on the trail.

Triathlon and swimming: Only film, no case. Cases can trap water at the case seals, making it difficult to synchronize the sensors with the body. The ceramic film GrizzGlass CeramicFilm or Glass Flex+ does not affect touch detection in water.

Daily use + office: The Adamo case (premium look) plus Bizon Glass Watch Clear tempered glass (frameless, full display view). This combination provides 360° protection without visual compromises.

Tip: If you are buying accessories for the first time, start with the combination of Felipe case + HydroFlex 3 PACK film (total 44 PLN). This is a complete starter set with a year’s supply for usage.

What else is worth buying for the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

The Home Screen store offers accessories dedicated to the GT Runner 2, but there are also universal products that may come in handy. The watch has a standard 22 mm strap mount, so straps from the watch strap category fit it. If you are considering an upgrade to a newer model, check the categories for Huawei Watch GT 6 or Huawei Watch Ultimate. You can see how the new GT 7 differs from the GT 6 in the comparison Huawei Watch GT 7 vs GT 6.

Summary of what to buy first

The best single investment in protecting the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 is the Bizon Case Watch Adamo (25 zł), which combines a protective frame with 9H tempered glass. The second place goes to the Bizon Case Watch Felipe (19 zł) for those training in difficult terrain.

If you prefer minimalism, opt for just the Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ [2 PACK] (19 zł), two pieces for the price of one at competitors, hybrid technology. For marathon runners, the optimal choice is the Bizon Watch Film HydroFlex [3 PACK] (25 zł) with self-regenerating function.

All the mentioned products are available at Home Screen store with next business day shipping (for orders placed by 12:00). Free delivery for orders over 100 zł and 30 days for returns.

Check the full range of accessories for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 →

FAQ, frequently asked questions about accessories for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2

What accessories fit the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2?

The Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 fits dedicated Bizon cases (Adamo and Felipe), tempered glasses from Bizon, Tech-Protect, and GrizzGlass, as well as protective films from Bizon and GrizzGlass. The watch also has a standard 22 mm strap mount, so universal straps of that width are compatible.

Is tempered glass better than film for Huawei Watch GT Runner 2?

Tempered glass better protects against point impacts (e.g., contact with a stone), while the film is thinner, lighter, and more flexible. For marathon runners, the film is better (less weight), while for trail runners, the hybrid glass Tech-Protect Glass Flex+ is recommended (a compromise between flexibility and hardness).

How much does it cost to repair the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2?

Repairing a cracked display of the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 at an authorized service center costs about 500–700 PLN. Protective cases start at 19 PLN, and films at 12.99 PLN, so the investment in protection pays off after the first avoided fall.

What size is the strap for the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2?

Do the Bizon Adamo and Felipe cases fit other Huawei Watch models?

Does the ceramic film make it difficult to use touch?

No, the GrizzGlass CeramicFilm has a thickness of 0.2 mm and does not noticeably affect the touch sensitivity of the Huawei Watch GT Runner 2. The Always-On Display function and all gestures (swipes, taps) work normally.

Which accessory to buy if I have a limited budget?

If you have less than 25 PLN, the best investment is GrizzGlass CeramicFilm (12.99 PLN), the ceramic film protects the screen from scratches and impacts at the lowest price in the store. If the budget allows for 25 PLN, opt for the Bizon Adamo case (case + glass 2-in-1).

2026-04-29

What is the best glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra? Ranking of 8 models for 2026

The best glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra is 3MK FlexibleGlass (34.90 PLN) — a hybrid glass with an antibacterial coating made of silver nanoparticles and a ceramic layer that absorbs impact energy and does not crack like traditional tempered glass. In second place is Bizon Glass Edge Duo (35 PLN) — a two-pack of 9H glasses with a black frame and 4D rounded edges.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a flagship device whose LTPO AMOLED display costs more than many mid-range smartphones. The under-display fingerprint sensor, peak brightness, and gently curved edges — all of this requires proper protection. In this ranking, you will find the best tempered and hybrid glasses for Xiaomi 17 Ultra (also compatible with 17 Pro Max), tested for hardness, fit, touch sensitivity, and compatibility with cases.

What to pay attention to when choosing glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

Before we move on to the ranking, it’s worth knowing what to consider when choosing protective glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Here are the key parameters.

Hardness 9H — this is the industry standard for tempered glass. It indicates resistance to scratches from keys, coins, and other everyday objects. Hybrid glasses usually have a hardness of 6–7H, which they compensate for with flexibility and resistance to cracking.

Thickness 0.25–0.43 mm — thinner glasses (0.25 mm) are less visible and work better with the under-display fingerprint reader. Thicker ones (0.33–0.43 mm) offer greater shock absorption from drops but may extend beyond the outline of the case.

Full Glue — the best glasses for Xiaomi 17 Ultra have a layer of glue over the entire surface, not just along the edges. This eliminates air bubbles and prevents the corners from peeling off.

Oleophobic coating — repels fingerprints, makes cleaning easier, and improves the smoothness of finger movement across the screen. The absence of this coating leads to quick dirt accumulation and visible streaks.

Compatibility with cases — glasses with 4D rounded edges and a black frame effectively mask the transition between the screen and the case, but some cases with high edges may lift the corners of the glass. A safe choice are models with a narrower outline (e.g., Bizon Glass Clear).

Under-display fingerprint reader — Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a sensor under the display. Standard 9H tempered glasses work correctly with it, but matte privacy glasses (e.g., Bizon Hybrid Shadow) may reduce the effectiveness of fingerprint recognition.

Ranking of glasses for Xiaomi 17 Ultra

1. 3MK FlexibleGlass — hybrid with antibacterial coating (34.90 PLN)

Hybrid glass 3MK FlexibleGlass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra product view

Our choice

3MK FlexibleGlass is a hybrid glass from a Polish brand that combines the flexibility of a film with the durability of a ceramic coating. It features a silver nanoparticle antibacterial coating — a rare trait in this segment, particularly useful for those who frequently use their smartphones in public places.

The construction absorbs impact energy, preventing it from cracking during moderate falls. The oleophobic coating reduces fingerprints, and the nearly invisible structure maintains the original appearance of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra screen. The package includes a complete installation kit with wipes and a bubble removal card.

Advantages:
– Antibacterial coating with silver nanoparticles
– Hybrid construction — does not crack upon falls
– Ceramic layer increases scratch resistance
– Oleophobic coating
– Complete installation kit

Check out 3MK FlexibleGlass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra at homescreen.pl →

2. Bizon Glass Edge Duo — complete protection in a two-pack (35 PLN)

Tempered glass Bizon Glass Edge Duo for Xiaomi 17 Ultra black frame 2-pack

Bizon Glass Edge Duo for Xiaomi 17 Ultra 4D edge view

Best price-to-quality ratio

Bizon Glass Edge Duo is the best-fitting protective package for Xiaomi 17 Ultra. In one box, you get two tempered glasses with a hardness of 9H, a thickness of 0.33 mm, and rounded 4D edges with a discreet black frame. The frame masks the transition between the screen and the casing, giving the effect of “edge-to-edge” glass.

The oleophobic coating reduces fingerprints, and the surface maintains full transparency and touch sensitivity. The set includes two complete installation accessory kits — microfiber cloth, cleaning wipes, positioning stickers, and dust absorber. Treat the second glass as a spare in case the first one breaks after a fall.

Advantages:
– Two glasses for the price of 35 PLN (17.50 PLN each)
– Hardness 9H and thickness 0.33 mm
– 4D rounded edges with a black frame
– Oleophobic coating
– Compatibility with Xiaomi 17 Ultra and 17 Pro Max

Check Bizon Glass Edge Duo for Xiaomi 17 Ultra →

3. Crong 3D Armour Glass Lite — full adhesive and 2.5D edges (29 PLN)

Crong 3D Armour Glass Lite tempered glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra black frame

Crong 3D Armour Glass Lite for Xiaomi 17 Ultra view 2.5D edge-to-edge

Our choice in the edge-to-edge category

Crong 3D Armour Glass Lite is a 9H tempered glass with full adhesive (Full Glue) that covers the entire display of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. The 2.5D edges gently slope down the sides, and the black frame conceals the outline of the case. A light transmittance ratio of 92% means that the screen retains its original brightness and colors.

A thickness of 0.33 mm is the industry standard. The shatter-resistant coating limits the spread of cracks — if the glass breaks upon impact, the shards remain within the film layer. The oleophobic coating minimizes fingerprints, and the package includes a complete installation kit.

Advantages:
– Full Glue adhesion across the entire surface
– 2.5D rounded edges with a black frame
– Shatter-resistant coating
– Light transmittance of 92%
– Hardness of 9H, thickness of 0.33 mm

Check out Crong 3D Armour Glass Lite for Xiaomi 17 Ultra →

4. Bizon Hybrid Shadow — privacy glass for the demanding (35 zł)

Bizon Hybrid Shadow privacy glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra matte

Our choice in the privacy category

Bizon Hybrid Shadow is a privacy hybrid glass that limits the viewing angle to 28°. When looking at the screen from an angle, a person next to you sees only a dark surface. An ideal solution for working in open spaces, traveling on public transport, and anywhere you want to protect confidential data on the screen.

The matte surface eliminates reflections and fingerprints, while a transparency level of 60% is sufficient for comfortable use of the phone. A thickness of 0.25 mm and a hardness of 6H strike a balance between protection and discretion. Remember — the matte privacy coating may reduce the effectiveness of the fingerprint reader under the screen.

Advantages:
– Viewing angle limited to 28°
– Matte surface without reflections
– Eliminates fingerprints
– Thickness of 0.25 mm — almost invisible
– Oleophobic coating

Check out Bizon Hybrid Shadow for Xiaomi 17 Ultra →

5. Bizon Glass Clear Duo — transparent glass in a two-pack (35 zł)

Bizon Glass Clear Duo tempered glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra 2-pack

Bizon Glass Clear Duo for Xiaomi 17 Ultra app view

If you don’t mind the lack of a black frame, Bizon Glass Clear Duo is a practical alternative to Edge Duo. You get two 9H tempered glasses that are fully transparent, without a frame color — ideal if you don’t want anything to stand out on the white background of the app.

A thickness of 0.33 mm, an oleophobic coating, and full transparency are standard. The glass covers the flat part of the display, and a slight air gap may appear on the curved edges — this is natural for 2D glasses. The second set remains in the box as a spare. Eco-packaging with minimal plastic is a plus for conscious users.

Advantages:
– Two glasses for 35 PLN (17.50 PLN each)
– Full transparency — without a black frame
– Hardness 9H, thickness 0.33 mm
– Oleophobic coating
– Eco-packaging

Check out Bizon Glass Clear Duo for Xiaomi 17 Ultra →

6. Bizon Glass Edge 2 — single glass with a frame (25 PLN)

Bizon Glass Edge 2 tempered glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra black frame

Bizon Glass Edge 2 is a budget choice with a frame for Xiaomi 17 Ultra. A single 9H glass with a thickness of 0.33 mm and 4D rounded edges with a black frame that masks the transition between the screen and the casing. It is the same quality standard as in Edge Duo, just without the markup at a price of 25 PLN.

The oleophobic coating reduces fingerprints, and the manufacturer claims greater transparency and smoothness than in the first generation of Glass Edge. The package includes a complete installation kit: microfiber, wipes, positioning stickers, and a dust absorber.

Advantages:
– Price 25 PLN for glass with a frame
– Hardness 9H, thickness 0.33 mm
– 4D rounded edges with a black frame
– Oleophobic coating
– Complete installation kit

Check out Bizon Glass Edge 2 for Xiaomi 17 Ultra →

7. Bizon Angelo Pack — case and tempered glass included (45 PLN)

Bizon Angelo Pack for Xiaomi 17 Ultra view of the case and glass set

Our choice in the set category

Bizon Angelo Pack is a clever “two in one” solution — in one box you get a smoky case with a beige frame and the Bizon Glass Edge tempered glass with a black frame. The set costs 45 PLN (or 40.50 PLN in a product bundle), which is less than buying both products separately. It’s the perfect option if you’re buying accessories for the new Xiaomi 17 Ultra and want to ensure full protection right away.

The glass has standard parameters of the Edge series: hardness 9H, thickness 0.3 mm, and 2.5D coverage with a black frame. The smoky case is made of flexible material with a matte finish — it protects the edges and back of the phone, fits well in the hand, and does not collect fingerprints. The beige frame adds a subtle color accent.

Advantages:
– Case and tempered glass at one price — 45 PLN
– Bizon Glass Edge with a black frame (hardness 9H, 2.5D)
– Smoky case with a beige frame included
– Cheaper than buying separately

Check out the Bizon Angelo Pack for Xiaomi 17 Ultra →

8. GrizzGlass HybridGlass — best price for hybrid glass (14.99 PLN)

GrizzGlass HybridGlass hybrid glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra main view

GrizzGlass HybridGlass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra flexibility and resistance

Best price in the ranking

For 14.99 PLN you get hybrid glass from the Polish brand GrizzGlass, which strengthens the screen by 400% against impacts and is scratch-resistant. The construction combines tempered glass with a flexible film — thanks to this, the glass does not shatter like traditional tempered glass.

The surface has an oleophobic coating, and the precise laser cut ensures a perfect fit for the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. The manufacturer guarantees full compatibility with the in-screen fingerprint reader and Face Unlock. Polish production means a shorter supply chain and a lower carbon footprint.

Advantages:
– Lowest price in the comparison — 14.99 PLN
– Screen reinforcement by 400% against impacts
– Flexible — does not crack like tempered glass
– Oleophobic coating, precise laser cut
– Polish production

Check GrizzGlass HybridGlass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra →

Comparison of glasses for Xiaomi 17 Ultra — summary table

Glass	Price	Type	Hardness	Frame	For whom
3MK FlexibleGlass	34.90 PLN	Hybrid antibacterial	7H	❌	Antibacterial coating, drop protection
Bizon Glass Edge Duo	35 PLN	Tempered (2-pack)	9H	✅ Black	Best price-to-quality ratio
Crong 3D Armour Glass Lite	29 PLN	Tempered Full Glue	9H	✅ Black	Edge-to-edge with full adhesion
Bizon Hybrid Shadow	35 PLN	Hybrid privacy	6H	❌	Privacy protection (angle 28°)
Bizon Glass Clear Duo	35 PLN	Tempered (2-pack)	9H	❌	Full transparency, two-pack
Bizon Glass Edge 2	25 PLN	Tempered	9H	✅ Black	Cheapest glass with a frame
Bizon Angelo Pack	45 PLN	Case + tempered glass	9H	✅ Black	Protective set at one price
GrizzGlass HybridGlass	14.99 PLN	Hybrid	6H	❌	Cheapest flexible protection

Which glass to choose for Xiaomi 17 Ultra? Recommendations

The choice of glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra depends on what you value the most. Here is a short guide tailored to your needs.

If you care about hygiene and drop resistance → choose 3MK FlexibleGlass (34.90 PLN). The antibacterial coating with silver nanoparticles and a hybrid construction that absorbs impact energy — this is our number one choice.

If you want to get two glasses for the price of one → Bizon Glass Edge Duo (35 PLN). Two 9H glasses with a black frame and 4D edges for 17.50 PLN each — the second one remains as a spare.

If you are looking for full screen coverage with a black frame → Crong 3D Armour Glass Lite (29 PLN) with full adhesion and 2.5D edges fits perfectly over the entire display of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra.

If you want to protect your privacy on the screen → Bizon Hybrid Shadow (35 PLN) limits the viewing angle to 28° — no one next to you will see what you have on the screen.

If you are buying a set of accessories → Bizon Angelo Pack (45 PLN) is a case and tempered glass in one package. You save compared to buying separately and have full protection right away.

If price is the most important factor → GrizzGlass HybridGlass for 14.99 PLN is the cheapest flexible protection in the comparison, with a guarantee of screen reinforcement by 400%.

Tip: The glass protects the screen, but the Leica camera module in the Xiaomi 17 Ultra protrudes beyond the casing and also requires protection. If you care about full protection, consider complementing the screen glass with a case that has a high edge around the lens.

Don’t forget about cases and accessories

Tempered glass protects the display, but the Xiaomi 17 Ultra also has a protruding Leica camera island and a metal frame prone to scratches. At homescreen.pl you will find a full range of accessories for the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — from cases by Bizon, Tech-Protect, and Ringke, to wireless chargers and camera protection.

If you are comparing the Xiaomi 17 Ultra with the competition, check out our article Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra — comparison of flagship cameras. And if you are considering other models from the series, see the full category of Xiaomi 17 accessories.

Summary

The best glass for the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is 3MK FlexibleGlass (34.90 PLN) — a hybrid glass with an antibacterial coating, a ceramic layer, and a construction that absorbs impact energy. If you prefer classic tempered glass with a reserve, Bizon Glass Edge Duo (35 PLN) offers two 9H glasses with a black frame and 4D edges. The widest coverage is provided by Crong 3D Armour Glass Lite (29 PLN) with full adhesion, and those who value privacy should reach for Bizon Hybrid Shadow (35 PLN) with a 28° viewing angle. In the budget category, GrizzGlass HybridGlass wins at 14.99 PLN.

Check the full offer of tempered glasses for Xiaomi 17 Ultra at homescreen.pl — free shipping on orders over 100 PLN and next business day shipping.

FAQ — frequently asked questions

Which tempered glass fits the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

Tempered glasses designed specifically for the Xiaomi 17 Ultra fit this model. In the offer of homescreen.pl, you will find glasses from 3MK, Bizon, Crong, and GrizzGlass — all with precise cutouts for the fingerprint sensor, upper speaker, and protruding camera module. Most models are also compatible with the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max.

Does the glass for Xiaomi 17 Pro Max fit the 17 Ultra?

Yes, most glasses marked as “for Xiaomi 17 Ultra / 17 Pro Max” (e.g., Bizon Glass Edge and Clear series) are compatible with both models. Both phones have a similar display size and identical sensor placement. Always check the packaging to see if the manufacturer lists both models.

Does tempered glass affect the fingerprint reader on Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

Standard 9H tempered glasses with a thickness of 0.33 mm work properly with the under-display fingerprint reader on the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Matte privacy glasses (e.g., Bizon Hybrid Shadow) may pose a problem — their coating that reduces the viewing angle can lower the effectiveness of fingerprint recognition.

How much does glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra cost?

Prices for glasses for Xiaomi 17 Ultra start at 14.99 PLN (GrizzGlass HybridGlass) and go up to 45 PLN for the case + glass set Bizon Angelo Pack. Most of the glasses themselves fall within the range of 25–35 PLN. The premium hybrid 3MK FlexibleGlass with an antibacterial coating costs 34.90 PLN.

Is it worth buying hybrid glass instead of tempered glass?

Hybrid glass (e.g., 3MK FlexibleGlass, GrizzGlass HybridGlass) is flexible and does not shatter like classic tempered glass, but it has lower hardness (6–7H instead of 9H). It is suitable for people who often drop their phones. Classic 9H tempered glass handles scratches from keys and coins in pockets better.

Does glass with a black frame better protect the screen of Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

Glass with a black frame (Bizon Glass Edge, Crong 3D Armour) conceals the transition between the screen and the case and looks more aesthetically pleasing, especially with a case. The protection itself is comparable to transparent models — the difference lies in the appearance. Choose the framed version if you are using a case with high edges.

How to apply tempered glass on Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

Clean the screen with a damp cloth and dry it with a microfiber cloth. Use the positioning stickers from the kit to lift the glass and collect dust with a dust absorber. Slowly bring the glass to the top edge and lower it — air bubbles will disappear on their own within 24–48 hours. In every package of glasses from 3MK, Bizon, and Crong, you will find a complete installation kit.

2026-04-27

What is the best charger for MacBook Neo 13 [2026]? Top 7 models

The best charger for MacBook Neo 13 is Ugreen X524 45 W USB-C GaN (59.90 PLN), a compact GaN power supply with Power Delivery that fully utilizes the maximum 30 W that the MacBook Neo accepts, and the additional 15 W reserve will also allow you to charge your iPhone. The second place goes to Usams T70 40 W (49 PLN), a multi-port charger with 2× USB-C and 2× USB-A. Below is the full ranking of 7 models with prices, specifications, and recommendations for various scenarios.

MacBook Neo 13″ (A18 Pro) is sold without a power adapter, in the box you will find only the laptop and a USB-C cable. You need to purchase the charger separately. We selected 7 models from the homescreen.pl offer, with power ranging from 33 W to 140 W, which is where the new MacBook actually uses the available energy. We focused on proven brands: Ugreen (including Nexode S 140 W), Usams (including US-CC180 Sandru 65 W), Spigen, Crong, and 3MK.

What power charger for MacBook Neo 13?

MacBook Neo 13 with A18 Pro chip is the cheapest Apple laptop, launching in March 2026, priced from $599. The device weighs under 1.3 kg and has two USB-C ports (USB 3 on the left, USB 2 on the right). Unlike the MacBook Pro, the Neo does not support fast charging.

The optimal charger power for MacBook Neo 13 is around 35 W, as this model can accept a maximum of 30 W. Tests have shown that the Neo will not utilize higher power when charging the laptop itself.

Weaker chargers, such as 20 W, will also charge the laptop, but the charging time will be noticeably longer. Stronger chargers, such as 60–140 W, will be useful when you want to charge multiple devices simultaneously or if you also use them for a more powerful laptop. We do not include models exceeding 140 W in the ranking, as for the Neo they would only mean additional cost, not speed.

When is it worth choosing a stronger charger (45–140 W)?

A higher power charger will be useful if:

You plan to also charge a more powerful laptop with it, e.g. MacBook Pro (14″ requires 70–96 W, 16″ even 140 W).
You are looking for a multi-port charger to simultaneously charge the MacBook Neo and other devices, such as an iPhone, iPad, or AirPods.
You travel often and want to have one charger for the entire Apple ecosystem.
You want to keep some power reserve for future devices.

Tip: If you want to charge your laptop and other devices, such as an iPhone and iPad, at the same time, choose a multi-port charger with two or three USB-C ports. Smart power management will automatically adjust the performance for each connected device.

What standards to look for?

A charger for the MacBook Neo should support:

USB Power Delivery (USB PD), a fast charging standard up to 240 W, essential for USB-C.
Minimum 30 W on the USB-C port, to ensure the Neo charges at full supported speed.
GaN (gallium nitride), allows for a smaller charger while maintaining power; ideal for a backpack.
PPS (Programmable Power Supply), optional, useful for newer iPhones and Samsungs.

Ranking: 7 best chargers for MacBook Neo 13

The following models were selected from the homescreen.pl offer, comparing power, number of ports, GaN technology, and value for money. All come from reputable brands and fall within the range of 33–140 W.

1. Ugreen X524 45 W USB-C GaN, our choice (59.90 PLN)

Our choice. Ugreen X524 45 W is a GaN charger with a single USB-C port and a power of 45 W for under 60 PLN, making it hard to find a better price-to-performance ratio. Gallium nitride has allowed the casing to be reduced to the size of a standard 25 W charger while delivering a full 45 W output.

45 W is a safe buffer above the maximum 30 W that Neo accepts. This means that the laptop will charge at the full supported speed, and Ugreen X524 is also sufficient for the iPhone 17 Pro Max (27 W) or iPad Pro. If you want a ready-made set, choose the variant Ugreen X524 45 W with a 1 m USB-C cable for 69.90 PLN.

Parameter	Value
Power	45 W
Ports	1× USB-C
Technology	GaN, USB PD
Weight	approx. 80 g
Price	59.90 zł

2. Usams T70 40 W, multi-port home hub (49.00 zł)

If you are looking for one charger that can handle the entire family of devices, Usams T70 40 W is the cheapest option in the ranking. Four ports (2× USB-C + 2× USB-A) allow you to charge a MacBook Neo, iPhone, iPad, and headphones simultaneously, and the total cost is 49 zł. This is unbeatable in this category.

It is worth remembering that in the Usams T70 40 W is the total power, intelligently distributed among the ports. When charging four devices simultaneously, Neo will receive less than 30 W, but overnight charging of the entire set is not a problem. It is the perfect charger for a desk or a nightstand.

Parameter	Value
Power	40 W (total)
Ports	2× USB-C + 2× USB-A
Technology	USB PD, Quick Charge
Price	49.00 zł

3. 3MK Hyper Charger PD 33 W GaN, the most power-matched (49.90 zł)

3MK Hyper Charger PD 33 W GaN is the most precisely power-matched model in the ranking. 33 W is practically exactly what Neo can accept (30 W), so you are not paying for unused capacity. At this price, you also get a second USB-A port, useful for a phone with an older cable or an additional accessory.

3MK supports a full set of fast charging standards: USB PD, QC 4+, PPS, AFC, FCP, and SCP. The intelligent circuit automatically adjusts the power to the connected device, and protections against overheating, overloading, and voltage spikes protect both the charger and the laptop.

Parameter	Value
Power	33 W (total)
Ports	1× USB-C + 1× USB-A
Technology	GaN, PD, QC 4+, PPS
Price	49.90 zł

4. Spigen Essential 45 W (white) with USB-C cable, premium (79.00 zł)

Spigen is a brand that has built a reputation for premium accessories for the Apple ecosystem. Spigen Essential 45 W is a stable, reliable choice with a 1 m USB-C cable included, you don’t need to buy anything extra. The cable from Spigen is armored and durable, which matters for everyday use in a backpack.

45 W in Spigen Essential is the same power as in Ugreen, but for an additional 20 PLN you get a branded cable and a classic, white design that matches the MacBook. If you care about aesthetics and a branded set, it’s a reasonable expense.

Parameter	Value
Power	45 W
Ports	1× USB-C
Technology	USB PD
Included	1 m USB-C cable
Price	79.00 zł

5. Crong Ultra Compact GaN 45 W with PPS, battery protection (89.00 zł)

Crong Ultra Compact 45 W stands out for two reasons: very small housing (one of the smallest 45 W chargers on the market) and full support for the PPS (Programmable Power Supply) standard. PPS dynamically adjusts the voltage, which in practice means less heat and reduced battery cell consumption in the long term.

Crong Ultra Compact is an option for those who want to take care of the longevity of their MacBook Neo and iPhone battery. The price of 89 PLN is higher than the competition, but for the PPS technology in such a compact housing, it’s fair.

Parameter	Value
Power	45 W
Ports	1× USB-C
Technology	GaN, PD 3.0, PPS
Price	89.00 PLN

6. Usams US-CC180 Sandru 65 W GaN, multi-port travel (129.00 PLN)

Usams US-CC180 Sandru 65 W is a compact GaN charger that combines higher power with multi-port capability in one travel case. Two USB-C ports (main up to 65 W) and one USB-A output allow simultaneous charging of a MacBook Neo, iPhone, and smartwatch, while the foldable plugs save space in your backpack.

65 W provides a real reserve: the MacBook Neo will get its 30 W from the main port, while the second USB-C port can still power the iPhone at 27 W. For those who want one charger for business trips and home, Usams US-CC180 is a sensible compromise between power and size.

Parameter	Value
Power	65 W (total)
Ports	2× USB-C + 1× USB-A
Technology	GaN, USB PD, QC
Price	129.00 PLN

7. Ugreen Nexode S 140 W GaN with 3× USB-C, desktop power hub (199.00 PLN)

Ugreen Nexode S 140 W is the most versatile charger in the ranking. Four ports (3× USB-C + 1× USB-A) and 140 W of total power allow you to simultaneously power a MacBook Pro 16″ (140 W), MacBook Neo, iPhone, and wireless headphones, while GaN ensures that the casing remains compact and does not heat up under load.

At the price of 199 PLN Ugreen Nexode S is exceptionally advantageous, competing single-port 140 W chargers from original manufacturers cost twice as much, and here you also get 3× USB-C for power distribution. This is a choice for users who want to reduce the number of chargers on their desk to one and have extra power for a laptop running at full load.

Parameter	Value
Power	140 W (total)
Ports	3× USB-C + 1× USB-A
Technology	GaN, USB PD 3.1
Price	199.00 PLN

Comparison of chargers for MacBook Neo 13

Model	Power	Ports	GaN	PPS	Price
Ugreen X524 45 W	45 W	1× USB-C	✅	❌	59.90 zł
Usams T70 40 W	40 W	2× USB-C + 2× USB-A	❌	❌	49.00 zł
3MK Hyper Charger 33 W	33 W	1× USB-C + 1× USB-A	✅	✅	49.90 zł
Spigen Essential 45 W white	45 W	1× USB-C	❌	❌	79.00 zł
Crong Ultra Compact 45 W	45 W	1× USB-C	✅	✅	89.00 zł
Usams US-CC180 Sandru 65 W	65 W	2× USB-C + 1× USB-A	✅	❌	129.00 zł
Ugreen Nexode S 140 W	140 W	3× USB-C + 1× USB-A	✅	❌	199.00 zł

Which charger to choose? Recommendations based on scenarios

We have shown the full spectrum of possibilities. To make the decision easier, we suggest which charger to choose depending on how you use your MacBook Neo:

Only MacBook Neo, daily use → Ugreen X524 45 W (59.90 PLN) or 3MK Hyper Charger 33 W (49.90 PLN).
Neo + iPhone / iPad, mobile → Ugreen X524 45 W or Crong Ultra Compact 45 W (both single-port, charging the laptop and phone sequentially).
The whole family of devices, desk / nightstand, budget-friendly → Usams T70 40 W (49 PLN), four ports, unbeatable price.
Travel + simultaneous charging of 2-3 devices → Usams US-CC180 Sandru 65 W (129 zł), 2× USB-C + USB-A in a compact GaN housing.
Desktop, one station for MacBook Pro, Neo, iPhone, and accessories → Ugreen Nexode S 140 W (199 zł), 3× USB-C + USB-A, 140 W to share, can simultaneously power MacBook Pro 16″ and additional devices.
Ready set with cable in the box → Spigen Essential 45 W (79 zł), branded USB-C cable included.
Battery protection in the long term → Crong Ultra Compact 45 W PPS (89 zł).

What to avoid when choosing a charger for MacBook Neo

Not every USB-C charger will charge the MacBook Neo as it should. What to watch out for:

Chargers below 20 W will charge the Neo, but very slowly. They are not suitable for intensive laptop use while charging.
Chargers without USB Power Delivery, some cheap models are limited to 5 V / 3 A, which gives a maximum of 15 W. Neo won’t even utilize its 30 W limit.
Cheap products from marketplaces without certifications, the lack of short-circuit and over-voltage protections poses a real risk of damaging a laptop worth several thousand zlotys.
A single 5–10 W charger from a phone, it will physically connect, but it may even discharge the laptop during intensive use.

Note: MacBook Neo does not support fast charging (like MacBook Pro). Buying a 140 W charger just for Neo makes no sense, as you will only utilize a maximum of 30 W from it. It only makes sense if you plan to charge a MacBook Pro or several devices at the same time.

Where to buy a charger for MacBook Neo 13?

You can find all the chargers from the ranking in the category network chargers at homescreen.pl. The store also has a separate category for accessories for MacBook Neo 13″ A18 Pro, where you will find compatible Tech-Protect cases, GrizzGlass screens, and 3MK films.

If you also use an iPhone, it’s worth checking out MagSafe accessories, the wireless chargers work with the phone, and the same USB-C power supply powers both it and the MacBook. This is the most economical way to reduce the number of chargers at home. A wider selection of power banks, USB-C cables, and wireless chargers can also be found in the collective category charging accessories.

The USB Power Delivery standard, which is supported by both the MacBook Neo and all chargers in the ranking, is detailed in the official USB-IF specification. It’s a good source if you want to understand why 30 W from one charger is not the same as 30 W from another.

Our choice: For most MacBook Neo 13 users, the optimal choice will be the Ugreen X524 45 W GaN (59.90 PLN), it has ample power, GaN technology, is affordable, and comes from a trusted brand.

Summary

The MacBook Neo 13 is sold without a power adapter, so you need to purchase a charger for the MacBook Neo separately. The optimal power is around 35 W, as the laptop accepts a maximum of 30 W and does not support fast charging. More powerful chargers in the range of 45–140 W make sense mainly when you want to charge other devices simultaneously or a more powerful MacBook Pro.

If you don’t know where to start, choose Ugreen X524 45 W (59.90 PLN), Usams T70 40 W (49 PLN) or 3MK Hyper Charger 33 W (49.90 PLN), all three support USB PD and will charge the Neo at full available speed.

If you also charge your phone and tablet while traveling, consider the Usams US-CC180 Sandru 65 W (129 PLN) with 2× USB-C + USB-A. For a desk with a MacBook Pro, Neo, and other accessories, the best choice is the Ugreen Nexode S 140 W (199 PLN), which has 3× USB-C + USB-A and 140 W total power, covering even the MacBook Pro 16″ along with a phone and headphones.

Check the full range of chargers for MacBook Neo in the network chargers category at homescreen.pl and choose a model that fits your work style. If you have any questions, feel free to write to [email protected], and we will advise you on the best configuration for your devices.

FAQ, frequently asked questions

What power charger is optimal for MacBook Neo 13?

The optimal power is around 35 W, as the MacBook Neo accepts a maximum of 30 W and does not support fast charging. Chargers of 33–45 W provide the full supported speed with a slight buffer for a phone.

Will a 20 W charger charge the MacBook Neo?

Yes, a 20 W charger will charge the MacBook Neo, but the charging time will be noticeably longer, by about 30–40% compared to a 30–45 W power adapter. This is a good emergency option, but not for everyday use.

Will the charger for iPhone 16 Pro Max charge the MacBook Neo?

Yes, if it is a USB-C 30 W (or more) charger with USB Power Delivery support. The 20 W charger from the iPhone will also work, but charging will be slower than with a dedicated 40–45 W power adapter.

Does the MacBook Neo come with a charger in the box?

No. In the MacBook Neo box, you will find only the laptop and a USB-C cable. The power adapter must be purchased separately; Apple offers 20 W, 30 W, and 35 W dual-port models.

Is it worth buying a 140 W charger for the MacBook Neo?

Only if you plan to use the same charger for the MacBook Pro 14″ or 16″ (which require 70–140 W). For the Neo itself, a 33–45 W charger is sufficient, as the laptop will not draw more than 30 W anyway.

What is the difference between a GaN charger and a regular one?

GaN (gallium nitride) is a semiconductor technology that allows for a 30–50% reduction in charger size while maintaining the same power. GaN chargers heat up less and are lighter, making them ideal for backpacks and travel.

Will a charger from a manufacturer other than Apple work with the MacBook Neo?

Yes, any USB-C charger that supports USB Power Delivery works with the MacBook Neo, regardless of the brand. Standards (USB PD, power) are what matter, not the manufacturer. Branded chargers from Ugreen, Usams, or Spigen meet the same USB-IF specifications as the original Apple.

What charger brands are recommended for the MacBook Neo?

For the MacBook Neo, chargers from trusted accessory brands are the best choice: Ugreen, Usams, Spigen, Crong, and 3MK. These are manufacturers with years of experience in USB PD and GaN, with reliable protections and warranties.

2026-04-24

Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra — which camera is better? Comparison

Vivo X300 Ultra and OPPO Find X9 Ultra are the only smartphones with a dual 200 MP setup — but each implements this idea differently. Vivo focuses on ZEISS T* optics with gimbal stabilization and a 400 mm teleconverter, while OPPO counters with a triple optical zoom from Hasselblad (3× + 10×) and a 7050 mAh battery. Which one better replaces a compact camera? We compare them point by point.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra has its global premiere on April 21, 2026 — this is the first Ultra model in OPPO’s history to hit European markets. Vivo X300 Ultra has been available for pre-order in Europe since April 16. Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor and Sony LYT-901 main sensor, but differ practically in everything else.

Note: OPPO Find X9 Ultra had not yet officially premiered at the time of publication of this article. OPPO specifications are based on the manufacturer’s official announcements, certification entries (China Telecom), and reliable leaks.

Looking for accessories for the new flagship? Check out cases and glass for OPPO Find X9 and accessories for Vivo X phones at Home Screen.

Specifications Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Premiere	April 2026 (Europe)	April 21, 2026 (globally)
Screen	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3168), 144 Hz, ZEISS Master Color	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3120), 144 Hz, 3600 nits
Screen protection	Armor Glass	NanoCrystal Shield
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
RAM	12/16 GB LPDDR5X	12/16 GB LPDDR5X
Storage	256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1	256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1
Main camera	200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.85, OIS gimbal, ZEISS T*	200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.5, OIS, Hasselblad
Telephoto 3-4×	200 MP Samsung HP0 (1/1.4″), f/2.3, 85 mm, 3.7× periscope, ZEISS APO	200 MP OmniVision OV52A (1/1.28″), f/2.2, 70 mm, 3× periscope, Hasselblad
Telephoto 10×	none	50 MP Samsung JNL (1/2.75″), f/3.5, 230 mm, 10× periscope
Ultrawide	50 MP Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″), f/2.0, 116°, OIS	50 MP Sony LYT-600 (1/1.95″), f/2.0, 120°
Multispectral sensor	5 MP VCS 3rd generation	3.2 MP (color accuracy)
Selfie	50 MP, f/2.5, AF	50 MP, AF
Video	8K/30, 4K/120 10-bit Log (all lenses), APV 422, ACES, Dolby Vision	4K/120, 10-bit, Dolby Vision HDR
Battery	6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)	7050 mAh (silicon-carbon)
Wired charging	100 W	100 W SuperVOOC
Wireless charging	40 W + reverse	50 W AirVOOC + 10 W reverse
Dimensions	8.19 mm thickness	163.04 × 76.91 × 9.15 mm
Weight	232-237 g	235-238 g
Water resistance	IP68/IP69	IP68/IP69
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
NFC / IR	yes / yes	yes / yes
USB	Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort	Type-C 3.2
SIM	dual nano-SIM	dual nano-SIM
Fingerprint reader	ultrasonic, under the screen	ultrasonic, under the screen
Speakers	stereo, Hi-Res	stereo
System	Android 16, OriginOS 6	Android 16, ColorOS 16
Optical partnership	ZEISS	Hasselblad
Dedicated camera button	none	yes (Camera Quick Launch)
External teleconverter	ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra (17.4× zoom)	Hasselblad 300 mm
Satellite connectivity	yes (1 TB version)	yes (Satellite version)
Colors	black, silver, green	Polar Glacier, Sand Canyon, Earth Tundra
Price from (estimated)	~6500 PLN (pre-order)	~6000-7000 PLN (estimated, premiere 21.04)

The full specifications of both phones can be compared on GSMArena.

Vivo X300 Ultra -- ZEISS camera module with dual 200 MP

OPPO Find X9 Ultra -- round Hasselblad camera module with quadruple lens

Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra — ZEISS vs Hasselblad

The camera of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the camera of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra are the two most ambitious photographic systems in smartphones of 2026. Both have a dual 200 MP setup, but differ in philosophy and zoom range.

Main camera — the same sensor, different approach

Both phones use the same Sony LYT-901 sensor (1/1.12″) — one of the largest in smartphones. The key difference lies in the optics:

Vivo X300 Ultra has a brighter telephoto lens with gimbal OIS stabilization and ZEISS T* certification (anti-reflective coatings). The f/1.85 aperture is a solid result.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra according to leaks goes further with an aperture of f/1.5 — it’s one of the brightest optics in smartphone history (some sources report f/1.8, official data will be revealed on April 21). A brighter lens means more light on the sensor, which translates to better photos in low light. Hasselblad calibration gives photos a characteristic, warm tone.

OPPO’s advantage in the brightness of the main lens (f/1.5 vs f/1.85). Vivo responds with gimbal stabilization, which can provide sharper images at longer exposure times.

Zoom – this is where the biggest difference lies

This is the key point of this comparison.

Vivo X300 Ultra has one 200 MP telephoto lens with 3.7× optical zoom (85 mm) and an optional ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter, which provides 17.4× optical zoom. In the range of 3.7-17×, it is the best zoom system in a smartphone — but the teleconverter is purchased separately.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra has two telephoto lenses: 200 MP 3× periscope (70 mm) and 50 MP 10× periscope (230 mm) — both built into the phone. You don’t need any accessories to achieve 10× optical zoom. Lossless zoom reaches up to 40-50× thanks to computations.

In the range of 3-5× both phones will deliver excellent photos from the 200 MP sensors. Above 5× OPPO has a built-in 10× zoom, while Vivo needs a teleconverter. But with the teleconverter, Vivo achieves 17.4× at full 200 MP — a range unavailable to any other smartphone.

OPPO wins in versatility (triple zoom without accessories), Vivo wins in maximum range (400 mm with teleconverter).

Ultrawide

Here Vivo X300 Ultra has a significant advantage. The Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″) sensor is much larger than the Sony LYT-600 (1/1.95″) in OPPO. Additionally, the ultrawide Vivo has its own OIS stabilization, which is lacking in OPPO.

A larger sensor and OIS clearly result in better ultrawide photos, especially in low light and when recording video.

Vivo X300 Ultra wins — the 1/1.28″ sensor with OIS is in a different league.

Night Photos

Both phones use the same main sensor, the Sony LYT-901, but OPPO has a brighter lens (f/1.5 vs f/1.85). In theory, this provides about 40% more light on the sensor, which should translate to better night photos from the main camera.

Vivo responds with gimbal stabilization OIS, which allows for longer exposure times without blur. In practice, both approaches yield great results at night.

Slight advantage for OPPO due to a potentially brighter lens — but the final aperture will be confirmed at the premiere, and the real difference in photo quality will only be visible after independent tests.

Vivo X300 Ultra -- back of the phone with ZEISS camera module

OPPO Find X9 Ultra -- back of the phone with Hasselblad camera island

Video

Vivo X300 Ultra dominates in video:
– 4K/120 fps 10-bit Log on all lenses (main, tele, ultrawide)
– APV 422 encoding and ACES workflow
– 8K/30 fps, Dolby Vision HDR

OPPO Find X9 Ultra according to current information records 4K/120 fps with 10-bit color and Dolby Vision HDR. Log recording and 8K have not yet been confirmed by OPPO — the predecessor Find X9 Pro supported Log up to 4K/120 with ACES, so the Ultra model likely offers this as well. Full details will be revealed after the premiere on April 21.

Vivo wins video — 10-bit Log on every lens and APV 422 are professional tools. For stable video recording in motion, a tripod or gimbal for your phone will come in handy.

Screen – twin parameters

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Diagonal	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED
Resolution	1440 × 3168 (2K)	1440 × 3120 (2K)
Refresh Rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak Brightness	4500 nits (claimed)	3600 nits
Calibration	ZEISS Master Color	HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid
Protection	Armor Glass	NanoCrystal Shield

Both phones have nearly identical screens — 6.82″ LTPO AMOLED with a 2K resolution and a 144 Hz refresh rate. These are some of the best displays on the market.

Vivo claims a higher peak brightness (4500 vs 3600 nits) and offers ZEISS Master Color calibration — a bonus for photographers evaluating images on the screen. OPPO counters with HDR Vivid support and NanoCrystal Shield as screen protection.

Minimal draw — both screens are excellent. Vivo potentially has a brighter panel, but without independent tests, it’s hard to confirm.

Battery and Charging

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Capacity	6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)	7050 mAh (silicon-carbon)
Wired charging	100 W	100 W SuperVOOC
Wireless charging	40 W	50 W AirVOOC
Reverse charging	yes (wireless)	yes (10 W wireless)
Battery life	80% after 1200 cycles	no data

OPPO Find X9 Ultra features the latest silicon-carbon battery with a capacity of 7050 mAh — one of the largest batteries in flagship devices on the market. Vivo offers 6600 or 7000 mAh depending on the variant.

The wired charging is identical (100 W), but OPPO has better wireless charging (50 W AirVOOC vs 40 W on Vivo). Both phones support reverse charging.

OPPO wins with the battery — guaranteed 7050 mAh and faster wireless charging.

Planning to take a flagship on a longer trip? Check out smartphone power banks and wall chargers at Home Screen.

Build, weight, and water resistance

Vivo X300 Ultra -- screen and frame of the phone

Both phones have IP68 and IP69 certifications — they can withstand immersion in water and a stream of hot water under pressure. Taking photos in the rain is not a problem.

OPPO Find X9 Ultra is slightly thicker (9.15 mm vs 8.19 mm for Vivo) and weighs 235-238 g. Available in three color variants with eco-leather: Polar Glacier (light blue), Sand Canyon (orange), and Earth Tundra (dark brown). It has a dedicated camera button (Camera Quick Launch) and a quick access button Plus Key.

Vivo X300 Ultra is slimmer (8.19 mm) and weighs 232-237 g. Available in black, silver, and green with an Armor Glass finish. Both phones have an infrared emitter (IR blaster).

Draw — Vivo is slimmer, OPPO has a more interesting design with eco-leather and a dedicated camera button.

Vivo X300 Ultra price vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra price

Variant	Vivo X300 Ultra	OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Base	~6500 PLN (pre-order with Pro Video set)	~6000-7000 PLN (estimated, premiere on 21.04)
Top	~8600 PLN (16 GB/1 TB)	no data
Teleconverter	ZEISS 400 mm (~2000 PLN)	Hasselblad 300 mm (price unknown)

The price of the Vivo X300 Ultra starts at 6500 PLN in pre-order with the Pro Video Rig Kit — this is the confirmed price. The price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet been officially announced and will only be revealed at the premiere on April 21, 2026. Based on the price of the OPPO Find X9 Pro (~5499 PLN in Europe), we estimate that the OPPO Find X9 Ultra will cost ~6000-7000 PLN, but this is just our estimation.

Both phones have dedicated photographic accessories — teleconverters (ZEISS 400 mm vs Hasselblad 300 mm) and grips with a battery.

The price of OPPO will be confirmed on April 21 — we will return with an update after the premiere.

Unique features – what distinguishes each model

Only Vivo X300 Ultra:

ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra Teleconverter — 17.4× optical zoom in 200 MP
4K/120 10-bit Log on all lenses + APV 422 + ACES
Ultrawide with 1/1.28″ sensor (Sony LYTIA 818) with OIS
5 MP multispectral sensor VCS 3rd generation
Gimbal stabilization OIS (main camera)
ZEISS Master Color screen calibration

Only OPPO Find X9 Ultra:

Triple optical zoom (3× + 10×) — without accessories up to 230 mm
Main lens f/1.5 — the brightest among flagships
7050 mAh battery — the largest in comparison
50 W wireless charging AirVOOC
Dedicated camera button + Plus Key button
Hasselblad Color Calibration on all lenses
Hasselblad 300 mm teleconverter
5 years of system updates, 6 years of security updates

Summary: which one to choose?

Choose Vivo X300 Ultra if:
– You record professional videos (10-bit Log on every lens, APV 422)
– You need extreme zoom with a teleconverter (400 mm, 17.4×)
– You care about the best ultra-wide (1/1.28″ sensor with OIS)
– You prefer a slimmer design (8.19 mm)
– You want neutral, true-to-life colors from ZEISS

Choose OPPO Find X9 Ultra if:
– You want a triple zoom built into the phone (3× + 10× without accessories)
– You mainly photograph in low light (f/1.5 lens)
– You care about the largest battery (7050 mAh)
– You value warm, distinctive colors from Hasselblad
– You want a dedicated camera button

The comparison of Vivo X300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra is a clash of two mobile photography philosophies — ZEISS vs Hasselblad, gimbal vs triple zoom, professional video vs versatility without accessories. There is no single winner — there is your winner.

Looking for a case, tempered glass, or charger for your new flagship? Check out accessories for OPPO Find X9, Vivo X accessories, and wireless chargers at Home Screen — with free delivery from 100 PLN and a rating of 4.9/5 on Google.

FAQ – frequently asked questions

When is the OPPO Find X9 Ultra premiere?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra premiere takes place globally on April 21, 2026. This is the first Ultra model in OPPO’s history to hit the European markets.

What is the price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra in Poland?
The price of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet been officially announced. Based on the price of the OPPO Find X9 Pro (~5499 PLN), we estimate that the Ultra model will cost around 6000-7000 PLN. The official price will be revealed on April 21.

Will the OPPO Find X9 Ultra be available in Poland?
Yes — OPPO has confirmed the global premiere, including for the European markets. In Poland, OPPO is available, among others, through Media Expert. The exact date of availability in stores depends on the distributor.

Which phone takes better photos?
The Vivo X300 Ultra camera excels in video (10-bit Log on each lens, APV 422) and ultra-wide (1/1.28″ sensor). The OPPO Find X9 Ultra camera has an advantage in zoom (built-in 10× without accessories) and night shots (f/1.5 lens). Both have the same main sensor, the Sony LYT-901.

Which phone has a better battery?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has a 7050 mAh battery with 50 W wireless charging. The Vivo X300 Ultra has a 6600-7000 mAh battery with 40 W wireless charging.

What is the best camera smartphone in 2026?
The Vivo X300 Ultra, OPPO Find X9 Ultra, and Xiaomi 17 Ultra are the top three camera smartphones of 2026. Each excels in a different category — Vivo in video, OPPO in zoom, Xiaomi in mechanical optical zoom with Leica colors.

What are the opinions on the OPPO Find X9 Ultra?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has not yet had its official premiere (April 21, 2026), so independent opinions and reviews will appear after this date. Its predecessor — the OPPO Find X9 Pro — ranked 5th in the DxOMark ranking, which bodes well for the Ultra model.

2026-04-13

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra – comparison of flagship cameras

Vivo X300 Ultra has a dual 200 MP setup with ZEISS optics and a 400 mm teleconverter, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra features a 1-inch Leica sensor with a mechanical zoom of 75-100 mm. Both phones target photographers, but the philosophy of each is completely different — Vivo focuses on raw power and zoom range, while Xiaomi emphasizes the atmosphere of photos and hardware HDR. Which one better replaces a compact camera? If you’re looking for the best photography smartphone of 2026, the choice comes down to these two models.

Vivo X300 Ultra went on European pre-sale on April 16, 2026, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has been available since the end of February. They are direct competitors in the ultra-premium segment, united by one ambition: to replace the compact camera. However, they differ in philosophy, optics, and price.

Specifications Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Parameter	Vivo X300 Ultra	Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Premiere	April 2026 (Europe)	February 2026 (globally)
Screen	6.82″ LTPO AMOLED, 2K (1440×3168), 144 Hz, ZEISS Master Color	6.9″ OLED Xiaomi HyperRGB, 2608×1200, 120 Hz LTPO, 300 Hz touch, 12-bit
Peak brightness	4500 nits (declared)	3500 nits
Screen protection	Armor Glass	Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
RAM	12/16 GB LPDDR5X	16 GB LPDDR5X
Storage	256/512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1	512 GB/1 TB UFS 4.1
Main camera	200 MP Sony LYT-901 (1/1.12″), f/1.85, OIS gimbal, ZEISS T*	50 MP Light Fusion 1050L (1″), f/1.67, OIS, LOFIC HDR
Telephoto	200 MP Samsung HP0 (1/1.4″), f/2.3, 85 mm, 3.7× periscope, ZEISS APO	200 MP Samsung HPE (1/1.4″), f/2.39-2.96, 75-100 mm mechanical zoom, OIS
Ultrawide	50 MP Sony LYTIA 818 (1/1.28″), f/2.0, 116°, OIS	50 MP Samsung JN5 (1/2.75″), f/2.2, 14 mm, 115°
Multispectral sensor	5 MP VCS 3rd generation	none
Selfie	50 MP, f/2.5, AF	50 MP OV50M, f/2.2, AF, 21 mm, 90°
Video	8K/30, 4K/120 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision, APV 422	8K/30, 4K/120 Log, ACES, Dolby Vision, slow-mo 1080p/1920 fps
Battery	6600/7000 mAh (silicon-carbon)	6000 mAh (global version)
Wired charging	100 W	90 W (~43 min)
Wireless charging	40 W + reverse charging	50 W
Reverse charging	yes (wireless)	yes (22.5 W wired)
Dimensions	8.19 mm thick	162.9 × 77.6 × 8.29 mm
Weight	232-237 g (depending on color)	218.4 g (Black/White) / 219 g (Green)
Water resistance	IP68/IP69	IP68
Bluetooth	5.4	6.0
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7 (tri-band, Wi-Fi 6e)
NFC	yes	yes
Infrared port (IR)	yes	yes
USB	Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort	Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort
SIM	dual nano-SIM	nano+nano or nano+eSIM or eSIM+eSIM
Fingerprint reader	ultrasonic, under display	ultrasonic, under display
Speakers	stereo, Hi-Res	stereo, Hi-Res
System	Android 16, OriginOS 6	Android 16, HyperOS 3
DxOMark	not yet rated	166 points (#6 globally)
Satellite connectivity	yes (1 TB version)	none
Colors	black, silver, green	black, white, green (Starlit Green)
Price from	approx. 7999 PLN for the 16 GB/1 TB variant	approx. 6499

The full specifications of both phones can also be compared on GSMArena. Looking for accessories for your new flagship? Check out cases and glass for Xiaomi 17 Ultra and accessories for Vivo X phones at Home Screen.

Camera Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra — which one takes better photos?

This is where the real fun begins — the camera of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the camera of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra approach mobile photography from completely different angles.

Camera Philosophy

Vivo X300 Ultra is a “technologist” — it focuses on raw specification power. The dual 200 MP sensor (main Sony LYT-901, f/1.85 + telephoto Samsung HP0, f/2.3) provides a huge field for framing and digital zooming. OIS stabilization at gimbal level and ZEISS T* certification on the main lens are parameters rarely seen in smartphones. Additionally, the ultra-wide lens with a large Sony LYTIA 818 sensor (1/1.28″) — significantly larger than the competition.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra is an “artist” — a 1-inch main sensor with LOFIC technology (hardware HDR without frame merging) and a mechanical optical zoom of 75-100 mm are solutions known from professional cameras. Collaboration with Leica translates into characteristic color reproduction and emulation of Leica M9 films.

Daytime photo quality

In good lighting, Vivo X300 Ultra produces more neutral, true-to-life colors. Photos from the 200 MP sensor have an enormous amount of detail — when cropped to a lower resolution, the effect is incredibly sharp.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra with a 1-inch sensor captures more light and creates a more natural background blur (bokeh). Colors in Leica Vibrant mode are warmer and more saturated, while in Leica Authentic mode — truer, with the characteristic “leica look”.

Draw. Vivo wins in detail and resolution, Xiaomi — in atmosphere and color reproduction. The choice depends on the photography style.

Night mode photos

Here, Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a clear advantage. The 1-inch sensor with LOFIC technology processes exposure information at the hardware level, resulting in more balanced night photos without the typical artifacts from merging multiple frames.

Vivo X300 Ultra performs well thanks to CIPA 7.0 stabilization, which allows for longer exposure times without blurring. In practice, both phones deliver excellent results at night, but Xiaomi retains more detail in shadows and better controls noise.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins — the LOFIC sensor is a real advantage in low light.

Zoom and telephoto lens

This is the key difference between the two phones.

Vivo X300 Ultra offers a 200 MP telephoto lens with a focal length of 85 mm (3.7× optical zoom). Additionally, there is an optional ZEISS 400 mm G2 Ultra teleconverter, which provides up to 17.4× optical zoom at full 200 MP resolution. This is a record among smartphones.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a 200 MP telephoto lens with mechanical optical zoom of 75-100 mm (3.2-4.3×). This is the first such solution in a smartphone — a movable optical element provides true optical zoom without quality loss across the entire focal range.

At close-ups of 3-5×, Xiaomi delivers sharper images because it uses optical zoom without digital cropping. Above 5×, Vivo takes the lead — with the teleconverter, it achieves ranges unavailable to any other smartphone.

Vivo wins in range, Xiaomi — in photo quality in the popular 3-5× range. The ZEISS teleconverter is a powerful accessory, but you buy it separately.

If you plan to record professional video on your smartphone, a tripod or gimbal for your phone. will also be useful.