Kategori: No category

What is the best smartphone for photos in 2026? The answer is not straightforward — each manufacturer focuses on different strengths.

In this ranking of phones for photos, we compare five flagships sorted by camera quality — from the iPhone 17 Pro Max, through the 1-inch sensor of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra with Leica optics, to the revolutionary vivo system with a ZEISS lens.

Ranking of the best phones for photos 2026 — quick overview

Before we move on to a detailed analysis, here is a summary of our top five at a glance:

Position	Model	DxOMark	Main sensor	Optical zoom	Price from
1.	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max	168 pts	48 MP, sensor 1/1.28″	8x (tetraprism, 200 mm)	6,299 PLN
2.	Xiaomi 17 Ultra	166 pts	50 MP, Light Fusion 1050L (1″)	4.3x (mechanical Leica zoom)	6,499 PLN
3.	Google Pixel 10 Pro	163 pts	50 MP, Samsung GNK (1/1.31″)	5x (100x Pro Res Zoom)	~3,450 PLN
4.	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra	157 pts	200 MP, ISOCELL HP2 (1/1.3″)	2x/3x/5x/10x	6,499 PLN
5.	vivo X300 Ultra	TBD*	200 MP, Sony LYTIA-901 (1/1.12″)	3.5x (17x with ZEISS extender)	~7,500 PLN

*estimated price — global launch Q2 2026

---

1. Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — lider DxOMark i 8x zoom tetrapryzmat

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max to najlepszy telefon do zdjęć 2026 według rankingu DxOMark (168 pkt). Ogromny skok w teleobiektywie — z 5x na 8x zoom optyczny z nowym tetrapryzmem i sensorem 48 MP — czyni go numerem jeden wśród smartfonów fotograficznych.

System aparatów

Obiektyw	Rozdzielczość	Sensor	Przysłona	Ogniskowa
Główny	48 MP Fusion	1/1.28″	f/1.5	24 mm
Ultraszeroki	48 MP	—	f/2.2	13 mm
Teleobiektyw 8x (tetrapryzmat)	48 MP	56% większy sensor	f/2.8	200 mm
Przedni (Centre Stage)	18 MP	kwadratowy sensor	f/2.2	—

Dlaczego numer 1?

iPhone 17 Pro Max wprowadza przełomowy teleobiektyw — 48 MP sensor z 8-krotnym zoomem optycznym (200 mm) na tetrapryzmie nowej generacji. To najdłuższa ogniskowa w historii iPhone’a. Dzięki crop z sensora 48 MP, jakość optyczna utrzymuje się nawet przy 16-krotnym zakresie zoomu. To ogromny postęp względem 12 MP teleobiektywu w poprzedniku.

Video remains the hallmark of Apple — 4K Dolby Vision, ProRes Log, Cinematic Mode, and Spatial Video for Apple Vision Pro. The new 18 MP front camera with a square Centre Stage sensor allows for rotating the photo orientation without turning the phone. The physical Camera Control button turns the iPhone into an intuitive camera.

Tip: Check out cases and tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max at Home Screen — you’ll protect both the camera and the display at the same time.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths: Highest DxOMark score (168 points), 8x optical zoom 48 MP (200 mm), best video (4K ProRes Log), Camera Control, Spatial Video.

Weaknesses: No 8K video, high price starting from 6,299 PLN, smaller main sensor than Xiaomi and vivo.

---

2. Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 1-calowy sensor i mechaniczny zoom Leica

Xiaomi 17 Ultra to smartfon stworzony z myślą o fotografii — 1-calowy sensor główny Light Fusion 1050L i mechaniczny zoom optyczny z certyfikacją Leica APO sprawiają, że granica między smartfonem a aparatem bezlusterkowym zaciera się bardziej niż kiedykolwiek.

System aparatów

Obiektyw	Rozdzielczość	Sensor	Przysłona	Ogniskowa
Główny	50 MP	Light Fusion 1050L (1″)	f/1.67	23 mm
Ultraszeroki	50 MP	—	f/2.2	14 mm
Teleobiektyw (mechaniczny zoom)	200 MP	1/1.4″	—	75–100 mm (4,3x)
Przedni	32 MP	—	f/2.0	—

Dlaczego na podium?

Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a 1-inch sensor in the main camera — this is the largest sensor among smartphones in 2026 (excluding the yet-to-be-global vivo X300 Ultra). The Light Fusion 1050L sensor with LOFIC HDR technology offers a full well capacity 6.3 times greater than its predecessor, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra. In practice, this means phenomenal dynamic range — details in both bright and dark areas of the photo.

The 200 MP telephoto lens with a 1/1.4″ sensor is a revolution — a mechanical optical zoom system with three groups of lenses changes the focal length from 75 to 100 mm. Leica APO eliminates chromatic aberrations, and the optical quality zoom reaches an equivalent of 400 mm. The special edition Leica Leitzphone adds a physical zoom ring on the body.

Video and special features

Recording 8K at 24 fps, 4K at 120 fps Dolby Vision, Movie mode with full manual control and 10-bit Log support. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a serious tool for video creators.

Advice: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra with the Leica camera module requires solid protection — check out cases for Xiaomi 17 Ultra at Home Screen.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths: 1-inch main sensor, mechanical optical zoom, 200 MP telephoto lens, Leica APO optics, 6,500 mAh battery.

Weaknesses: No extender version (like vivo), 32 MP selfie camera weaker than Pixel 9 Pro, price starting from 6,499 PLN.

---

3. Google Pixel 10 Pro — master of artificial intelligence with 100x Pro Res Zoom

The Google Pixel 10 Pro is the best photo phone of 2026 for those who want to take the perfect picture without worrying about settings. The Tensor G5 chip with an enhanced TPU unit powers powerful AI features, and the new 100x Pro Res Zoom finally puts the Pixel on par with Samsung in terms of close-ups. A score of 163 points in DxOMark ranks it third in the world.

System aparatów

Obiektyw	Rozdzielczość	Sensor	Przysłona	Ogniskowa
Główny	50 MP	Samsung GNK (1/1.31″)	f/1.68	24 mm
Ultraszeroki (AF)	48 MP	1/2.55″	f/1.7	12 mm
Teleobiektyw 5x (peryskop)	48 MP	1/2.55″	f/2.8	110 mm
Przedni	42 MP	—	f/2.2	18 mm

Co wyróżnia Pixela 10 Pro?

Google Pixel 10 Pro dziedziczy najlepsze cechy poprzednika i dodaje kluczowe ulepszenia:

• 100x Pro Res Zoom — AI-wspomagany zoom z jakością optyczną do 10x
• 50 MP portrety — nowa jakość zdjęć portretowych dzięki Tensor G5
• 8K wideo — upscaling chmurowy do 8K z 4K, nowa funkcja Pixela
• Magic Eraser — usuwanie niechcianych obiektów i osób ze zdjęć
• Magic Editor — generatywna AI do modyfikacji elementów zdjęcia
• Best Take — składanie najlepszych min z wielu ujęć
• Night Sight Video — nagrywanie wideo w słabym oświetleniu z AI

Ultraszeroki obiektyw z autofocusem (f/1.7!) to jeden z najjaśniejszych w branży. Przedni aparat 42 MP z najszerszym kątem widzenia (18 mm) robi najlepsze selfie w tym zestawieniu.

Porada: Pixel 10 Pro to najkorzystniej wyceniony flagowiec w tym zestawieniu — od ~3 450 zł. Sprawdź dostępne akcesoria do Google Pixel 10 Pro w Home Screen.

Mocne i słabe strony

Mocne strony: DxOMark 163 pkt (3. na świecie), najlepsze funkcje AI, 50 MP portrety, naturalne odwzorowanie kolorów, najlepsza kamera selfie (42 MP), najniższa cena.

Słabe strony: 8K tylko przez upscaling chmurowy, Tensor G5 słabszy w ogólnej wydajności niż Snapdragon, mniejsze sensory niż Xiaomi/vivo.

---

4. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — king of zoom and versatility

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (157 pts DxOMark) is the best phone for photography in 2026 for those who value versatility. The quadruple camera system covers every photographic scenario — from ultra-wide landscapes to details of distant objects thanks to 100x Space Zoom.

Camera system

Lens	Resolution	Sensor	Aperture	Focal Length
Main	200 MP	Samsung ISOCELL HP2 (1/1.3″)	f/1.4	23 mm
Ultra-wide	50 MP	Samsung ISOCELL JN3 (1/2.5″)	f/1.9	120° FoV
3x Telephoto	10 MP	Sony IMX754 (1/3.94″)	f/2.4	67 mm
5x Telephoto (periscope)	50 MP	Sony IMX854 (1/2.52″)	f/2.9	111 mm
Front	12 MP	—	f/2.2	26 mm

Why is it still in the TOP 5?

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra inherits the proven quad zoom system from the S25 Ultra, but introduces key optical improvements — f/1.4 aperture in the main lens (47% brighter than f/1.7 in its predecessor) and f/2.9 in the periscope (37% brighter than f/3.4). Four optical focal lengths (23, 67, 111 mm + ultra-wide) still represent the widest zoom range among smartphones — no competitor offers this.

Video on this smartphone is a separate league — recording 8K at 30 fps on three lenses, Galaxy Log mode, and new 60 W charging. DxOMark points out issues with exposure and AF in low light, but in everyday use, the Galaxy S26 Ultra remains an incredibly versatile tool.

Advice: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a premium flagship — it’s worth securing it with a solid case for Galaxy S26 Ultra that will protect the titanium frame and glass back.

Strengths and weaknesses

Strengths: The widest zoom range (4 focal lengths), brighter aperture f/1.4, 8K recording, 60W charging, Galaxy Log mode.

Weaknesses: DxOMark 157 points (18th in the world), 3x telephoto only 10 MP, unstable exposure according to DxOMark, high price starting from 6,499 PLN.

---

5. vivo X300 Ultra — record-breaking sensor and ZEISS optics

Vivo X300 Ultra is a phone with a good camera in 2026, which changes the game in mobile photography. Equipped with a record-breaking sensor — Sony LYTIA-901 with a size of 1/1.12″ — and full ZEISS T* APO optical certification, it approaches the capabilities of mirrorless cameras more than any competitor.

System aparatów

Obiektyw	Rozdzielczość	Sensor	Ogniskowa
Główny	200 MP	Sony LYTIA-901 (1/1.12″)	35 mm
Ultraszeroki	50 MP	Sony LYTIA-818 (1/1.28″)	14 mm
Teleobiektyw peryskop	200 MP	Samsung ISOCELL HP01 (1/1.4″)	3,5x
Multispektralny	5 MP	—	—
Przedni	50 MP (AF)	—	—

Co wyróżnia vivo X300 Ultra?

Kluczowym elementem jest akcesorium ZEISS Telephoto Extender Gen 2 Ultra — doczepiana soczewka, która zwiększa zoom z 3,5x do 17x optycznego (ekwiwalent 400 mm). To jedyny smartfon na rynku z możliwością osiągnięcia takiego zoomu w pełni optycznie. Z extenderem zachowujesz pełną rozdzielczość 200 MP.

The main sensor 1/1.12″ collects even more light than the 1-inch sensor of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. The ultra-wide 50 MP with a 1/1.28″ sensor is larger than the main sensors of many flagships — this is a unique feature of vivo.

Video and special features

Recording 4K at 120 fps Dolby Vision HDR on all rear lenses with 10-bit Log mode. vivo also offers a SmallRig accessory ecosystem (video cage).

Tip: The global launch of the vivo X300 Ultra is planned for Q2 2026. It’s worth keeping an eye on the availability of vivo accessories at the Home Screen store.

Strengths and weaknesses

Strengths: The largest sensors (1/1.12″ and 1/1.28″), 17x optical zoom with ZEISS extender, dual 200 MP cameras, 4K 120 fps Dolby Vision.

Weaknesses: The most expensive option in the ranking (~7,500 PLN), ZEISS extender is an additional purchase, global launch not until Q2 2026, 35 mm focal length may be too wide for portraits.

---

Best phone for photos 2026 — comparison in every scenario

The best flagship for photos is not just about specifications — it’s also about software, AI processing, and the accessory ecosystem. The following comparison of phones with the best camera takes into account ten key photographic scenarios.

Scenario	Best Choice	Why?
Daytime Photos	vivo X300 Ultra	Largest sensor 1/1.12″, 200 MP
Night Photos	Xiaomi 17 Ultra	1-inch sensor + LOFIC HDR, phenomenal dynamic range
Long Zoom (>5x)	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra	Quad zoom system, 100x Space Zoom
Portrait	Xiaomi 17 Ultra	Leica mechanical zoom 75-100 mm, natural bokeh
Selfie	Google Pixel 10 Pro	42 MP, widest angle 18 mm
Professional Video	iPhone 17 Pro Max	4K ProRes Log, Dolby Vision
Casual Video	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra	8K on three lenses
Action Shots (Sports)	vivo X300 Ultra	17x optical zoom with ZEISS extender
AI Photography	Google Pixel 10 Pro	Magic Eraser, Best Take, 100x Pro Res Zoom
Price to Quality Ratio	Google Pixel 10 Pro	From ~3,450 PLN for a flagship camera

---

Best Phone for Photos 2026 — Which to Choose?

Choosing the best phone for photography in 2026 depends on your shooting style and budget.

For versatile photographers: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — covers every scenario from ultra-wide to 100x zoom. A brighter f/1.4 aperture is a clear improvement over its predecessor.

For photography enthusiasts: Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 1-inch sensor and Leica mechanical zoom offer image quality unavailable on any other smartphone in this price range.

For budget-conscious professionals: vivo X300 Ultra — if you take mobile photography seriously. The largest sensors and 17x optical zoom with ZEISS extender are in a league of their own.

For filmmakers and video creators: iPhone 17 Pro Max — ProRes Log, 8x zoom 48 MP, and Spatial Video are professional tools in a smartphone.

For those who value simplicity and value: Google Pixel 10 Pro — Google’s artificial intelligence with 100x Pro Res Zoom will do most of the work for you, and the price starting at ~3,450 PLN is unbeatable.

Our verdict: iPhone 17 Pro Max is the best phone for photography in 2026 according to DxOMark (168 points) — it has the best camera in a phone for 2026 with a groundbreaking 8x zoom 48 MP. Xiaomi 17 Ultra with a 1-inch sensor and Leica optics (166 points) is ideal for photography enthusiasts, while Google Pixel 10 Pro (163 points, starting at ~3,450 PLN) offers the best value for money.

Flagships with large sensors consume more energy while photographing — check network chargers with USB-C PD to quickly charge your phone after a full day of shooting. For a longer outdoor session, it’s worth bringing a power bank — especially since recording in 4K and 8K can drain even a 6,000 mAh battery in a few hours.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the best phone for photos in 2026?

The best phone for photos in 2026 is the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max with a score of 168 points in DxOMark — it offers 8x optical zoom 48 MP (200 mm), the best video with ProRes Log and Camera Control. Right behind it is the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (166 points) with a 1-inch Leica sensor and the Google Pixel 10 Pro (163 points) with revolutionary AI photography.

Which phone takes the best night photos?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra with a 1-inch Light Fusion 1050L sensor and LOFIC HDR technology offers phenomenal dynamic range in low light. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra with an f/1.4 aperture (47% brighter than its predecessor) also performs excellently after dark.

Will vivo X300 Ultra be available in Poland?

vivo announced the global premiere of the X300 Ultra for Q2 2026. The premiere in China is scheduled for March 30, 2026. Availability in Poland depends on official distribution — it’s worth keeping an eye on updates on the manufacturer’s website.

Which flagship has the best zoom?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra with a quadruple optical system (2x/3x/5x/10x) and AI-assisted Space Zoom 100x offers the best built-in zoom range. The iPhone 17 Pro Max with 8x optical zoom 48 MP (200 mm) is a newcomer, while the vivo X300 Ultra with a ZEISS extender achieves a 17x purely optical zoom.

Is the Google Pixel 10 Pro a good choice for mobile photography?

Yes — the Google Pixel 10 Pro is an excellent choice, especially at its price (from ~3,450 PLN). The Tensor G5 powers unique AI features like Magic Eraser, 100x Pro Res Zoom, and Best Take. Natural color reproduction and Night Sight Video mode set it apart from the competition.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or Xiaomi 17 Ultra — which is better for photos?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra wins in zoom versatility (4 focal lengths) and 8K recording on three lenses. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra dominates in single photo quality thanks to its 1-inch sensor and Leica APO optics with mechanical zoom. Samsung is better for sports and wildlife photography, while Xiaomi excels in portraits and street photography.

The dilemma of POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max is one of the hottest smartphone comparisons of 2026. Both models debuted in March and immediately generated huge interest — they offer AMOLED displays with a brightness of 3,500 nits, IP68/IP69K protection, and 100 W charging. The key difference? Processor, battery, and camera. POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, while POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN. Below you will find a detailed comparison that will help you choose the right model.

Technical specifications — POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max

Before we move on to a detailed analysis, it’s worth seeing the full specifications of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in one place. The table below shows the key differences between both models.

Parametr	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Display	6,59″ AMOLED, 1,5K	6,83″ AMOLED, 1,5K
Brightness	3 500 nits (peak)	3 500 nits (peak)
Refresh Rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Processor	MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra (4 nm)	MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (3 nm)
AnTuTu v11	2 283 558	3 085 998
RAM / Storage	8/256 GB or 12/512 GB	12/256 GB or 12/512 GB
Main Camera	50 MP, Sony IMX882, OIS	50 MP, Light Fusion 600, OIS
Battery	6 500 mAh	8 500 mAh
Charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
System	Android 16, HyperOS 3	Android 16, HyperOS 3
Resistance	IP68 / IP69K	IP68 / IP69K
Weight	201,5 g	218 g
Fingerprint Reader	Optical (under display)	Ultrasonic (under display)
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
eSIM	No	Yes
Price from	1 399 zł	1 799 zł

Display — bigger doesn’t always mean better

Both the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max feature 1.5K AMOLED displays with a 120 Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 3,500 nits. They support Dolby Vision and HDR10+, resulting in excellent color reproduction when watching movies.

The main difference is the size — the POCO X8 Pro has a 6.59-inch display, while the POCO X8 Pro Max offers 6.83 inches. Both models are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i and have TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

Tip: If you value compactness and one-handed operation, the POCO X8 Pro will be more comfortable. For fans of large displays — the X8 Pro Max with its 6.83-inch panel is a better choice for movies and games.

The touch sampling rate is 480 Hz (Game Turbo) in both models, and the PWM dimming operates at 3,840 Hz — this is important for those sensitive to display flicker.

Processor and performance — here the POCO X8 Pro Max takes the lead

It’s one of the biggest differences when comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra built on a 4-nanometer process technology, while the Pro Max received the flagship Dimensity 9500s made in a 3 nm process.

The performance difference is evident — the POCO X8 Pro score in AnTuTu v11 is 2,283,558 points, while the POCO X8 Pro Max achieves 3,085,998 in AnTuTu:

Test	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max	Difference
AnTuTu v11	2 283 558	3 085 998	+35%
Process technology	4 nm (TSMC)	3 nm	Newer
GPU	Mali-G720 MC8	Immortalis-G925 MC12	Higher class

The Dimensity 9500s in the POCO X8 Pro Max is a flagship segment chip — the same processor can be found in phones costing over 3,000 PLN. The Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU provides smooth gameplay even in the most demanding mobile games, such as Genshin Impact or Honkai: Star Rail at the highest settings.

POCO X8 Pro with Dimensity 8500-Ultra also performs very well in everyday use — multitasking, social media, and gaming on medium settings are not a problem. However, in benchmarks and intensive games, the 35% difference in favor of the Max model is noticeable.

Both smartphones feature the POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system with a surface area of 5,300 mm², which effectively dissipates heat during longer gaming sessions.

It is worth adding that both models support 5G network (SA/NSA) — this is the standard in 2026, but still an important parameter when choosing a new smartphone. The RAM in both cases is LPDDR5X, and the internal memory is UFS 4.1 — the fastest available standards in the mid-premium segment.

Camera — Light Fusion 600 vs Sony IMX882

Both models have a 50 MP main camera with optical image stabilization (OIS), but the sensors used differ significantly.

POCO X8 Pro uses the Sony IMX882 — a proven sensor with a size of 1/1.95 inches and 0.8 μm pixels. It is a solid sensor that performs well in daylight and well-lit scenes.

POCO X8 Pro Max received the newer Light Fusion 600 with 1.6 μm pixels — twice as large as those in the X8 Pro. The Dual Native ISO Fusion technology improves dynamic range and significantly enhances photo quality in low light. In practice, this means less noise in night photos and better detail in shadows.

The other elements of the camera set are identical:
– Ultra-wide angle — 8 MP, f/2.2
– Front — 20 MP, f/2.2
– Video recording — 4K at 30/60 fps, slow motion 960 fps

Tip: If you often take photos in the evening or in poorly lit interiors, the POCO X8 Pro Max with Light Fusion 600 sensor will be a noticeably better choice.

Battery and charging — 6,500 vs 8,500 mAh

This is another category where the POCO X8 Pro Max clearly dominates. The 8,500 mAh battery (silicon-carbon technology) is 30% more than the 6,500 mAh in the Pro model.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Capacity	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Wired charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
Reverse charging	27 W	27 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Longevity	≥80% after 1,600 cycles	≥80% after 1,600 cycles

In practice, the POCO X8 Pro Max easily lasts two full days of moderate use, and with light usage, even three days. The POCO X8 Pro comfortably provides a full day even with intensive use.

Both models charge with a power of 100 W — the POCO X8 Pro Max recovers 50% of energy in about 24 minutes, and a full charge takes just over 50 minutes. Neither model supports wireless charging.

If you are looking for a fast wall charger that supports 100 W, it is worth choosing a model with USB Power Delivery (fast charging standard) or a dedicated Xiaomi charger. For daily top-ups while traveling, a compact power bank with the appropriate output power will also come in handy.

Construction and design — aluminum, glass, and IP69K

Both smartphones have aluminum frames, Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the front, and a IP68/IP69K certification — they can withstand immersion in water as well as a stream of hot water under pressure. This is rare in this price range. Despite their durability, it is worth protecting the display — protective films will provide additional protection against scratches in everyday use.

Parametr	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Wymiary	157,5 × 75,2 × 8,4 mm	162,9 × 77,9 × 8,2 mm
Waga	201,5 g	218 g
Tył obudowy	Szkło	Włókno szklane (fiberglass)
SIM	Dual nano-SIM	Dual nano-SIM + eSIM
Podświetlenie RGB	8 kolorów	8 kolorów
Kolory	Czarny, Biały, Mint Green	Czarny, Biały, Niebieski

POCO X8 Pro jest lżejszy o 16,5 g i nieco węższy — lepiej leży w dłoni i mieści się w węższych kieszeniach. Model Max jest smuklejszy (8,2 vs 8,4 mm), ale większy i cięższy ze względu na większą baterię i wyświetlacz.

Warto wspomnieć, że POCO X8 Pro dostępny jest również w limitowanej edycji Iron Man (12/512 GB) za 1 749 zł w promocji — to wariant dla fanów Marvel.

Niezależnie od wybranego modelu, dobrze jest zainwestować w odpowiednie etui do smartfona POCO, które ochroni aluminiową ramkę i szklaną lub włóknistą tylną część obudowy przed uszkodzeniami mechanicznymi.

Connectivity — Wi-Fi 7 and eSIM only in the Max model

In terms of connectivity, the POCO X8 Pro Max offers several significant improvements:

• Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) instead of Wi-Fi 6 — faster transfer and lower latency
• eSIM — a convenient solution while traveling, without the need to swap physical SIM cards
• Bluetooth 5.4 with Auracast — wireless audio sharing to multiple headphones simultaneously
• Symmetrical stereo speakers — better sound than standard stereo speakers in the X8 Pro

The POCO X8 Pro 5G and POCO X8 Pro Max 5G support both SA and NSA modes. Other common connectivity features include NFC, infrared port (IR blaster), USB-C 2.0, GPS L1+L5, and Dolby Atmos with Hi-Res Audio (24-bit/192 kHz). Neither model has a 3.5 mm headphone jack — if you prefer wireless audio, check out Bluetooth headphones compatible with both smartphones.

Security and Software

Both smartphones run on Android 16 with HyperOS 3 and will receive 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. They also have access to Google Gemini, Circle to Search, and AI tools (AI Writing, AI Speech).

The key difference concerns the fingerprint reader:

• POCO X8 Pro — czytnik optyczny pod ekranem
• POCO X8 Pro Max — czytnik ultradźwiękowy pod ekranem

Ultradźwiękowy czytnik działa szybciej, jest bardziej precyzyjny i rozpoznaje palec nawet gdy jest mokry — to wyraźna przewaga modelu Max.

POCO X8 Pro Max oferuje również funkcję Xiaomi Offline Communication o zasięgu do 500 m — pozwala komunikować się z innymi urządzeniami Xiaomi bez dostępu do internetu czy sieci komórkowej.

Cena POCO X8 Pro i POCO X8 Pro Max w Polsce

Ile kosztują te smartfony? Cena POCO X8 Pro startuje od 1 399 zł, a cena POCO X8 Pro Max od 1 799 zł w promocji na start (do 31 marca 2026):

Wariant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1 399 zł (tylko mi.com)	—
12/256 GB	—	1 799 zł (tylko mi.com)
12/512 GB	1 599 zł	1 999 zł
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1 749 zł	—

Ceny regularne (po promocji):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1 699 zł	—
12/256 GB	—	2 099 zł
12/512 GB	1 899 zł	2 299 zł
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1 999 zł	—

The difference of 400 zł between comparable variants (12/512 GB) is a reasonable surcharge for the flagship processor, larger battery, better camera, and Wi-Fi 7. You can find current prices and availability on the official POCO website.

Gaming performance — how do they perform in practice?

Simply comparing AnTuTu scores does not give the full picture. In everyday use, both smartphones perform excellently — apps open instantly, multitasking works without hiccups, and scrolling through the interface is smooth at 120 Hz.

The difference becomes apparent in demanding mobile games. The POCO X8 Pro Max with the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU maintains a stable 60 fps in Genshin Impact at the highest graphics settings, while the POCO X8 Pro with the Mali-G720 MC8 requires lowering some options to medium to maintain smoothness. In less demanding titles — PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, or Honkai: Star Rail — both models run without issues at high settings.

The POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system works effectively in both cases. After a 30-minute session of Genshin Impact, the casing temperatures remain within a comfortable range. The POCO X8 Pro Max has a slight advantage here due to its larger casing, which dissipates heat better.

For casual gamers, the POCO X8 Pro will be more than sufficient. However, if you regularly play the most demanding titles and care about maximum graphics settings, the Dimensity 9500s in the Max model is a safer choice for the next few years.

POCO X8 Pro Max vs competition — how does it fare against rivals?

It’s worth looking at both POCO models in the context of the market. In the price range of 1,400–2,300 PLN, the competition is significant:

• Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (~1,699 PLN) — better Samsung ecosystem, longer support (7 years of updates), but noticeably weaker Exynos 1580 processor and smaller 5,000 mAh battery. The POCO X8 Pro offers more performance for a similar price.
• Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (~1,599 PLN) — a close relative from the Xiaomi family. Similar specifications to the POCO X8 Pro, but slightly weaker Dimensity 8400-Ultra and smaller 6,200 mAh battery. POCO stands out with an IP69K certification.
• Nothing Phone (3a) (~1,799 PLN) — distinguished by its Glyph lighting design, pure Android, but weaker processor and smaller battery. A choice for those who prioritize aesthetics.
• Motorola Edge 60 (~1 899 zł) — a competitor with wireless charging, which is lacking in POCO. However, it falls short in performance compared to the POCO X8 Pro Max.

POCO X8 Pro Max at a price of 1 999 zł (12/512 GB) offers performance comparable to smartphones costing over 3 000 zł — Samsung Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, or Xiaomi 15. This is its biggest competitive advantage.

Summary of differences — who wins in each category?

Category	Winner	Why?
Display	POCO X8 Pro Max	Larger 6.83″ panel
Performance	POCO X8 Pro Max	Dimensity 9500s, +35% in AnTuTu
Camera	POCO X8 Pro Max	Light Fusion 600, better night photos
Battery	POCO X8 Pro Max	8,500 vs 6,500 mAh
Compactness	POCO X8 Pro	Lighter (201.5 g), narrower
Price	POCO X8 Pro	From 1,399 zł
Connectivity	POCO X8 Pro Max	Wi-Fi 7, eSIM, Auracast
Biometrics	POCO X8 Pro Max	Ultrasonic reader

POCO X8 Pro Max wins in six out of eight categories — but POCO X8 Pro defends itself with its price and compact dimensions.

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

The choice between POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max depends on your priorities and budget.

Choose POCO X8 Pro if:
– You are looking for the best value for money below 1,700 PLN
– You prefer a compact and lighter smartphone (201.5 g vs 218 g)
– You do not need flagship performance — Dimensity 8500-Ultra is more than enough for everyday tasks
– You are interested in the limited Iron Man edition

Choose POCO X8 Pro Max if:
– You want the flagship Dimensity 9500s processor with performance comparable to phones costing 3,000+ PLN
– You care about the longest battery life — 8,500 mAh provides 2–3 days without charging
– You take a lot of photos in low light — Light Fusion 600 makes a noticeable difference
– You need eSIM or Wi-Fi 7
– You value a faster and more accurate ultrasonic fingerprint reader

Our verdict: For an additional 400 PLN, POCO X8 Pro Max offers significantly more — a flagship processor, a huge battery, and a better camera. It is one of the best smartphones in terms of price to performance ratio in 2026. However, if compactness and a lower price are your priorities, POCO X8 Pro remains an excellent choice.

In summary, comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — both smartphones offer excellent value, but the Max model targets users who want flagship performance without the flagship price.

Are you looking for accessories for your new POCO smartphone? Check out cases and tempered glass for POCO phones at Home Screen — you will find protection tailored to your model.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — what are the differences?

The main differences are the processor (Dimensity 8500-Ultra vs flagship Dimensity 9500s), battery (6,500 vs 8,500 mAh), camera sensor (Sony IMX882 vs Light Fusion 600 with larger pixels), fingerprint reader (optical vs ultrasonic), and connectivity (Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7, no eSIM vs eSIM).

Is the POCO X8 Pro Max worth the extra 400 PLN?

Yes — for an additional 400 PLN, you get a flagship processor with 35% higher performance, a battery larger by 2,000 mAh, a better camera for night photos, Wi-Fi 7, and eSIM. This is one of the better upgrades on the smartphone market.

What is the price of the POCO X8 Pro in Poland?

The POCO X8 Pro costs from 1,399 PLN (8/256 GB, promotional price) to 1,899 PLN (12/512 GB, regular price). There is also a limited Iron Man edition available for 1,749–1,999 PLN.

Are the POCO X8 Pro and X8 Pro Max waterproof?

Yes — both models have an IP68 and IP69K rating, which means they are resistant to immersion in water (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes) and to a stream of hot water under pressure.

How long does the battery last in POCO X8 Pro Max?

The 8,500 mAh battery in the POCO X8 Pro Max lasts for 2–3 days of moderate use. The 100 W HyperCharge allows you to recover 50% of the energy in about 24 minutes.

Does POCO X8 Pro have eSIM?

No — eSIM is available only in the POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model supports only two physical nano-SIM cards.

AirPods Max 2 are new Apple over-ear headphones with the H2 chip, offering 1.5x better active noise cancellation than the previous generation. The price in Poland is 2499 zł, orders start on March 25, 2026, and deliveries will begin in early April.

Four years of waiting and the same price — sounds like good news. But has Apple changed enough to justify upgrading from the old Maxes? We check what exactly you get for that 2499 zł.

Technical specifications of AirPods Max 2

Parametr	AirPods Max (1. gen)	AirPods Max 2
Chip	Apple H1	Apple H2
Bluetooth	5.0	5.3
ANC	Standardowy	1,5x lepszy
Audio bezstratne	—	24-bit / 48 kHz (USB-C)
Tryb przezroczystości	Tak	Ulepszony
Adaptive Audio	—	✅
Wykrywanie rozmów	—	✅
Izolacja głosu	—	✅
Tłumaczenie na żywo	—	✅
Spersonalizowana głośność	—	✅
Czas pracy baterii	do 20 h	do 20 h
Złącze	Lightning / USB-C	USB-C
Waga	384,8 g	386,2 g
Kolory	5	5 (nowa paleta)
Cena w Polsce	2499 zł (USB-C)	2499 zł

---

Chip H2 — serce nowych AirPods Max 2

Największa zmiana kryje się pod aluminiową obudową. Nowe Apple AirPods Max korzystają z chipa H2 (tego samego, który zadebiutował w AirPods Pro 2), a ulepszenia dotyczą trzech kluczowych obszarów:

• Lepsza redukcja hałasu — nowe algorytmy obliczeniowe analizują dźwięk otoczenia do 48 000 razy na sekundę, co przekłada się na 1,5x skuteczniejsze ANC niż w pierwszej generacji
• Lower wireless latency — Bluetooth 5.3 reduces audio lag, which gamers and movie lovers will appreciate
• Lossless audio support — via USB-C cable, you can listen to music in 24-bit / 48 kHz quality (Apple Lossless)

The H2 chip also supports personalized spatial audio with dynamic head tracking — the effect is closest to what you know from the cinema. The result? On paper, it’s the same amplifier with a wide dynamic range, but in practice, the bass sounds fuller, and individual instruments are easier to extract from the mix. The difference is most noticeable in orchestral music and well-produced recordings on Apple Music — with a pop playlist, you might not notice it.

You can find the full range of Apple over-ear headphones at homescreen.pl.

---

New smart features

The new Apple AirPods Max take over features known from AirPods Pro 3, which were previously unavailable in the over-ear version.

Adaptive Audio is a feature that makes you stop thinking about headphone modes. Are you entering a café? The headphones automatically let in the voices around you. Are you getting on a train? ANC kicks in at full power. Conversation Awareness works similarly — when you start speaking, the music quiets down, and the voice of the person you’re talking to is amplified. You don’t have to take off your headphones to order a coffee.

Voice Isolation does the same but in the opposite direction — during a phone call, your conversation partner hears only you, even if you are calling from a busy street. All three features work without any configuration.

Live Translation requires an iPhone with iOS 26 and Apple Intelligence — so for now, it only works on iPhone 16 and newer. The headphones translate the conversation in real-time, displaying subtitles on the phone screen. It sounds futuristic, but in practice, it’s more of a help in simple conversations than a substitute for a translator. A dozen languages are supported, including Polish.

Personalized Volume learns your preferences and automatically adjusts the volume level to the surroundings — Marek, who commutes by subway to work every day and then sits in an open space, will appreciate this feature the most.

---

Price of AirPods Max 2 in Poland

Apple AirPods Max 2 cost in Poland 2499 zł — exactly the same as the USB-C version of the original AirPods Max. This is an amount that clearly positions them in the premium segment.

For comparison:

Model	Price in Poland	Type
AirPods 4	approx. 549 zł	In-ear, open
AirPods Pro 3	approx. 1099 zł	In-ear, ANC
AirPods Max 2	2499 zł	Over-ear, ANC
Sony WH-1000XM5	approx. 1299 zł	Over-ear, ANC
Bose QuietComfort Ultra	approx. 1699 zł	Over-ear, ANC

2499 zł for wireless headphones is a lot — almost twice as much as the Sony WH-1000XM5, which regularly compete head-to-head with the Max in blind sound tests. What are you paying extra for? Primarily for integration with the Apple ecosystem: automatic switching between iPhone, iPad, and Mac works so smoothly that after a week you’ll forget you ever manually switched devices. Features like live translation are an additional argument, but — let’s be honest — for most users, it’s a curiosity, not a reason to buy.

---

Design and materials — what has changed?

Short answer: almost nothing. If you placed AirPods Max 1 vs 2 side by side, the only visible difference would be the color. Apple has not changed the shape, weight (386 g — they are still among the heaviest popular over-ear headphones), or construction:

• Aluminum ear cups with independent rotation provide a perfect fit
• Mesh headband distributes pressure evenly across the top of the head
• Memory foam ear cushions — comfortable even during long hours of wear
• Digital Crown is used to adjust volume and control playback
• Listening mode button — a new element replacing the noise control button

What is new is the color palette. Instead of Space Gray, Silver, Sky Blue, Pink, and Green, we get: Midnight, Moonlight, Blue, Purple, and Orange. The particularly bold choice is the orange variant, which stands out against Apple’s typically muted offerings.

---

AirPods Max 2 vs AirPods Max — is the upgrade worth it?

If you have the original AirPods Max with the H1 chip, upgrading to the second generation makes sense in three cases:

1. You care about better ANC — 1.5x more effective noise cancellation is a noticeable difference, especially in public transport and open spaces
2. You want Adaptive Audio and Conversation Awareness — smart features that automate mode switching are a real convenience in daily use
3. You need live translation — if you travel or work in an international environment, Live Translation can be a game-changer

However, if your current AirPods Max are working flawlessly and you mainly listen to music at home — don’t replace them. The sound quality has improved, but not enough for you to notice a difference during everyday listening on Spotify. It’s better to wait for the third generation.

Advice: If you have AirPods Max with Lightning, the upgrade makes extra sense — you gain USB-C, which simplifies the cable setup and adds lossless audio.

For everyday charging, any USB-C charger will suffice — and the full range of all AirPods models and headphones can be found at homescreen.pl.

---

Ecology — Apple moves forward

Apple emphasizes sustainability in AirPods Max 2:

• 100% recycled rare earth metals in magnets
• 100% recycled polyester in ear cushions
• 100% recycled gold and tin in circuit boards
• Packaging made entirely from paper from natural fibers

This is a continuation of the Apple Carbon Neutral 2030 strategy, which encompasses an increasing number of product categories. You can find the full specifications of AirPods Max 2 on the official Apple website.

---

Summary — who are the AirPods Max 2 for?

AirPods Max 2 is an evolution, not a revolution. Apple has put a new chip into an old casing and you get genuinely better ANC, smart features from AirPods Pro 3, and lossless audio via USB-C. But you don’t get a new design, longer battery life, or a lower price. These are the best over-ear headphones from Apple that you can buy today.

Worth buying if:
– You use multiple Apple devices and value seamless integration
– You’re looking for top-tier ANC for working in noisy environments
– You want live translation features or Adaptive Audio

Consider alternatives if:
– You don’t need the Apple ecosystem — Sony WH-1000XM5 or Bose QC Ultra offer comparable ANC at a lower price. Compare over-ear headphones with ANC at homescreen.pl
– You prefer in-ear — AirPods Pro 3 have the same H2 chip for less than half the price

Our choice: AirPods Max 2 in Northern color — classic, versatile, and you won’t get bored with it after a year.

W sklepie homescreen.pl znajdziesz etui dopasowane do różnych generacji i modeli AirPods – od klasycznych modeli (1., 2. i 3. generacji), przez nowsze AirPods 4, aż po modele AirPods Pro 2 czy AirPods Pro 3. Dzięki temu bez problemu wybierzesz ochronne etui idealnie dopasowane do Twoich słuchawek, niezależnie od tego, jaką generację lub wariant posiadasz

Sprawdź wszystkie akcesoria do AirPods w homescreen.pl →

---

FAQ — najczęściej zadawane pytania

Kiedy premiera AirPods Max 2 w Polsce?

Zamówienia na nowe słuchawki startują 25 marca 2026, a pierwsze dostawy w Polsce ruszą na początku kwietnia 2026. Będą dostępne w autoryzowanych sklepach Apple oraz u partnerów handlowych.

How much do AirPods Max 2 cost in Poland?

The price of the second generation in Poland is 2499 PLN — the same as the USB-C version of the previous model. In the USA, the price is 549 dollars.

What are the differences between AirPods Max 2 and the first generation?

The main differences are the H2 chip instead of H1, 1.5x better noise cancellation, Bluetooth 5.3, lossless audio via USB-C, and new features: Adaptive Audio, Conversation Detection, Voice Isolation, and Live Translation. The design and battery (20 h) remain unchanged.

Do AirPods Max 2 have USB-C?

Yes, the second generation uses only the USB-C port for charging and wired listening to lossless music (24-bit / 48 kHz).

What colors are available for AirPods Max 2?

The new model is available in five colors: Midnight (black), Lunar Glow (gold), Blue, Purple, and Orange. This is a completely new palette compared to the first generation.

Is it worth buying AirPods Max 2 instead of Sony WH-1000XM5?

The second generation Apple Max headphones are a better choice for users of the Apple ecosystem due to automatic switching between devices and smart features. Sony WH-1000XM5 offers comparable ANC at a lower price (around 1299 PLN) and works better with Android devices.

Nothing officially presented the Phone 4a and 4a Pro. Prices in Poland start at 1,599 PLN for the 4a model and 2,099 PLN for the 4a Pro. Both smartphones feature a periscope telephoto lens with 3.5x optical zoom, 1.5K AMOLED displays, and a new Glyph system. Pre-orders for the Phone 4a start today — sales begin on March 13.

The Nothing Phone 4a series represents the biggest quality leap in the history of the “a” line. Periscope zoom, screen brightness up to 5000 nits, and Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 processor are parameters that just a year ago we found only in flagships. Nothing poses the question: why pay for a flagship when a mid-range phone offers 90% of its capabilities?

What’s new in the Nothing Phone 4a and 4a Pro?

The biggest changes compared to the previous generation (Phone 3a / 3a Pro):

• Periscope telephoto lens 50 MP with 3.5x optical zoom — a huge leap from 2x zoom in the Phone 3a. Hybrid zoom reaches 70x in the 4a and 140x in the 4a Pro.
• Brighter screens — 4500 nits (4a) and 5000 nits (4a Pro) vs ~2300 nits in predecessors. Gorilla Glass 7i instead of Panda Glass.
• New processors — Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (4a) and Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4a Pro). The Pro model is ~27% faster in CPU and ~65% more efficient in AI tasks.
• Refreshed Glyph — Phone 4a received a Glyph Bar (63 mini-LEDs in 7 zones), while 4a Pro got a Glyph Matrix (137 mini-LEDs with animations).
• Nothing OS 4.1 on Android 16 — 3 years of system updates + 6 years of security patches.
• eSIM in the Pro model — Phone 4a still uses only physical nano-SIM cards.

Specifications of Nothing Phone 4a vs 4a Pro

Parametr	Phone 4a	Phone 4a Pro
Wyświetlacz	6,78″ AMOLED, 120 Hz, 4500 nit	6,83″ AMOLED, 144 Hz, 5000 nit
Rozdzielczość	1224 x 2720 (1.5K)	1260 x 2800 (1.5K)
Procesor	Snapdragon 7s Gen 4	Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
RAM / pamięć	8/128, 8/256, 12/256 GB	8/128, 12/256 GB
Aparat główny	50 MP, f/1.9, OIS	50 MP Sony LYT700c, f/1.9, OIS
Teleobiektyw	50 MP peryskop, 3.5x zoom	50 MP peryskop, 3.5x zoom
Zoom hybrydowy	do 70x	do 140x
Ultraszeroki	8 MP, f/2.2, 120°	8 MP, f/2.2, 120°
Bateria	5080 mAh	5080 mAh
Ładowanie	50W przewodowe	50W przewodowe + reverse 7.5W
Glyph	Glyph Bar (63 LED)	Glyph Matrix (137 LED)
IP	IP64	IP65
Grubość / waga	8.6 mm / 204.5 g	7.95 mm / 210 g
eSIM	Brak	Tak
Kolory	biały, czarny, różowy, niebieski	czarny, srebrny, różowy

Design — dwa różne podejścia

Nothing zaskoczył, dając każdemu modelowi odrębną tożsamość wizualną.

Phone 4a kontynuuje kultowy przezroczysty design. Pod szkłem Gorilla Glass 7i widać elementy wewnętrzne — cewki, śruby i struktury PCB. Nowe kolory różowy i niebieski mają barwioną warstwę pod przezroczystym panelem, co daje subtelny, pastelowy efekt.

Phone 4a Pro is a completely different story. Nothing has given up the transparent back for a metal unibody made of aluminum. It is the sleekest Nothing in history (7.95 mm). It looks more premium, but loses some of its «nothing-like» character. The transparent elements have been limited to the camera island.

The common denominator is Glyph. In the 4a model, it is the Glyph Bar — 7 square LED segments in a strip. In Pro — Glyph Matrix with 137 mini-LEDs arranged in a circular field. The Matrix displays animated notifications, charging progress, and reacts to Live Updates from Android 16.

Camera — periscope in a mid-range for 1,599 PLN

This is the biggest highlight of the 4a series. The 50 MP periscope telephoto lens with 3.5x optical zoom and OIS is something that did not exist in the previous generation Nothing Phone 3a. The 50 MP sensor with PDAF and optical stabilization provides sharp photos even in low light.

The Pro model gets a better main sensor — Sony LYT700c — and a dual hybrid zoom (140x vs 70x in the standard 4a). Both models record in 4K with Dolby Vision and Ultra XDR.

The new TrueLens Engine in Nothing OS 4.1 adds photographic presets, including «Stretch» developed in collaboration with photographer Jordan Hemingway.

Prices in Poland

Variant	Phone 4a	Phone 4a Pro
8 GB / 128 GB	1 599 zł	2 099 zł
8 GB / 256 GB	1 749 zł	—
12 GB / 256 GB	1 899 zł	2 399 zł

Prices in Europe: Phone 4a from 349 EUR, Phone 4a Pro from 479 EUR.

Availability and dates

• Phone 4a: pre-sale from March 5, sale from March 13, 2026
• Phone 4a Pro: pre-sale from March 13, sale from March 27, 2026

Both models are available on the official website pl.nothing.tech. Color variants: 4a in white, black, pink, and blue; 4a Pro in black, silver, and pink. Pink and blue colors available exclusively in the 12/256 GB version.

Expect availability in Polish electronics stores after the regular sales begin.

Who is Phone 4a for, and who is it for Pro?

Phone 4a for 1 599 zł is the choice if you care about the transparent design of Nothing and don’t need the fastest processor. You get a periscope zoom, a great 1.5K screen, and Glyph Bar — all for under 1,600 zł. The best price-to-performance ratio in the series.

Phone 4a Pro for 2,099 PLN makes sense if you want a faster processor (+27% CPU, +65% AI), 144 Hz instead of 120 Hz, IP65, eSIM, and Glyph Matrix with animations. The unibody metal construction looks premium, although it loses the iconic transparent style.

Both models are a very strong proposition in their price ranges. The 3.5x periscope telephoto lens for 1,599 PLN is something that no competitor offers at this price.

Apple Watch Ultra 3 is an evolution, not a revolution compared to Ultra 2 – both watches look almost identical, but Ultra 3 has a larger display, longer battery life, satellite connectivity, and a 5G RedCap modem. For most users, Ultra 2 will still be a great choice, but if you are just buying a premium smartwatch or need maximum independence in the field – Ultra 3 is the best choice for 2025.

Comparison table: Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Ultra 3

Cecha	Apple Watch Ultra 2 (2023)	Apple Watch Ultra 3 (2025)
Start price (PL)	currently approx. 3399 zł	3799 zł (launch price)
Case material	Grade 5 titanium (natural or black)	Grade 5 titanium (natural or black)
Dimensions	49 × 44 × 14.4 mm	49 × 44 × 12 mm
Weight (without strap)	61.4–61.8 g	61.6–61.8 g
Display	1.92″ LTPO OLED (410 × 502 px, 326 ppi) – 3000 nit	1.99″ LTPO3 OLED (422 × 514 px, 326 ppi) – 3000 nit
Processor (SiP)	Apple S9 + Neural Engine	Apple S10 + Neural Engine
Internal memory	64 GB	64 GB
Cellular connectivity	4G/LTE (eSIM)	5G RedCap + 4G/LTE (eSIM)
Satellite connectivity	❌ None	✅ Emergency SOS via Satellite
Local connectivity	Wi-Fi 4 (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, UWB 2nd gen., GPS L1+L5	Same
Battery – typical usage	Up to 36 h	Up to 42 h
Battery – Low Power Mode	Up to 72 h	Up to 72 h
Resistance	WR100, IP6X, MIL-STD-810H	WR100, IP6X, MIL-STD-810H
Health sensors	Heart rate, ECG, SpO₂, temp., accelerometer, gyroscope	The same + hypertension notification, Sleep Score
Sports features	Multi-sport, Backtrack, compass, GPS L1+L5	The same + Workout Buddy (AI trainer)
Operating system	watchOS 10 → update to watchOS 26	watchOS 26 (factory)
Update support	until 2028	until 2030

What does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 look like and how does it differ from the Ultra 2?

Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 have a new design?

On the outside, Apple Watch Ultra 3 looks almost identical to Ultra 2, but the devil is in the details. Apple has retained the distinctive aircraft-grade titanium case (Grade 5) with a size of 49 mm, however, the new model has thinner screen bezels by 24%. This allows the Ultra 3 to offer a larger working area (1.99″ vs 1.92″) without increasing the overall dimensions.

Interestingly, the case of the Ultra 3 is also thinner (12 mm instead of 14.4 mm), which makes the watch sit better on the wrist.
The weight remains almost identical – around 61–62 g without the strap, so in everyday use, there is no noticeable difference in weight.

What materials are used in the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Both watches – Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 – utilize the same exceptionally durable titanium and sapphire glassthat is scratch-resistant.
The construction meets IP6X, WR100 (up to 100 m immersion) and MIL-STD-810H, which is a military standard for resistance to shocks, dust, moisture, and extreme temperatures.

In practice, this means that both Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 are ready for mountain trekking, swimming, and even diving up to 40 m – ideal for outdoor athletes.

What colors are available for the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Apple continues with two color variants:

• Natural titanium (silver)
• Black titanium

These are minimalist, elegant shades that pair well with any strap – from silicone sports to leather and fabric.
👉 See straps for Apple Watch Ultra 3 at the Home Screen store

---

Display, performance, and battery – what has been improved in the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Is the display in Ultra 3 better?

Yes. The Ultra 3 has a newer LTPO OLED 3rd generation panel, which provides better viewing angles, deeper blacks, and greater energy efficiency.
Although the brightness remains the same (3000 nits), in practice, the Ultra 3 is more readable in sunlight and has a smoother always-on mode with a refresh rate of 1 Hz – for the first time on the Apple Watch, you can constantly see the second hand.

The resolution has increased from 410×502 px to 422×514 px, which is not revolutionary but improves the sharpness of dials and the readability of maps in training mode.

Does the new S10 processor make a difference?

The Apple Watch Ultra 3 is powered by S10 SiP chip, which replaced S9 from Ultra 2.
The differences in speed are minimal, but S10 is more energy-efficient, which combined with the new display gives a real +6 hours of battery.
The new chip also enables wrist flick gesture (waving the wrist for control) and better processing of AI features with watchOS 26.

How long does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 last on battery?

Apple declares:

• Ultra 2: up to 36 h of normal use
• Ultra 3: up to 42 h (normally) or 72 h in power-saving mode

Tests confirm that Ultra 3 actually lasts even 2–3 days with typical use (with Always-On Display).
Fast USB-C charging in 15 minutes adds about 12 h of usage.

👉 Check fast chargers for Apple Watch Ultra 3

---

Connectivity and new features

5G, satellite, and greater independence

Apple Watch Ultra 3 is the first Apple smartwatch with support for 5G RedCap networks and satellite SOS connectivity.
Thanks to this, the watch can connect to the network even in places where there is no GSM coverage.
The Emergency SOS via Satellite feature allows you to send an emergency message and GPS coordinates to emergency services or emergency contacts — it works similarly to iPhone 14 and 15.
This solution is mainly aimed at people engaged in trekking, sailing, or off-road activities, where lack of coverage is a real problem.

The new modem 5G RedCap improves coverage and energy efficiency, not offering the full 5G speed known from smartphones, but sufficient for maps, notifications, or Siri.
In Poland, the 5G Standalone feature is already being implemented by operators, so Ultra 3 will be fully compatible in the coming months.

Additional connectivity enhancements

• improved antenna layout (better coverage in difficult terrain),
• UWB 2nd gen. – precise device locating in the “Find” app,
• dual GPS L1+L5 – accurate route tracking even in mountains and cities,
• Bluetooth 5.3 and Wi-Fi 4 (2.4 / 5 GHz) with lower power consumption.

These enhancements make Ultra 3 the most “independent” Apple smartwatch so far – it operates independently from the iPhone, even in the field.

Health and sports features

Both generations of the Apple Watch Ultra offer a wide range of health sensors, however, the Ultra 3 expands their capabilities programmatically.
The watch monitors heart rate (optical 3rd gen), ECG, blood oxygen (SpO₂), body temperature, and detects falls and accidents (Crash Detection).

The new features in Ultra 3 are:

• notifications for hypertension,
• Sleep Score – daily sleep quality rating,
• Workout Buddy – an AI smart coach from Apple Intelligence, analyzing progress and motivating during workouts.

In terms of sports, both models offer:

• measurement of running power, stride length, and ground contact,
• precise GPS L1+L5 and barometric altimeter,
• Multi-sport mode (triathlon, cycling, swimming, climbing),
• 86 dB emergency siren and Backtrack mode (return navigation).

The watches are waterproof up to 100 m, resistant to seawater and dust, and thanks to the EN13319 certification, they can serve as a dive computer.

---

Software and support

How long will Apple update these watches?

Apple is known for its long support of its devices, and the Ultra series is no exception.
Apple Watch Ultra 2 debuted with watchOS 10, and after updates, it now runs on watchOS 26, while Ultra 3 comes factory-installed with this version.

How long will support last?

• Ultra 2 – security and system updates expected until around 2028,
• Ultra 3 – full support until 2030.

This means that by purchasing Ultra 3, you gain two more years of updates, and consequently – a longer device lifespan and access to new Apple Intelligence (AI) features that may require a newer chip S10.

Compatibility and ecosystem

Both models work with iPhone 11 or newer (running iOS 26).
Thanks to integration with the Apple ecosystem, users can take advantage of:

• Apple Fitness+ (workouts with trainers),
• Apple Pay (contactless payments),
• Apple Music and Podcasts,
• health data synchronization in iCloud.

Ultra 3 and Ultra 2 also have full accessory compatibility – 49 mm bands and chargers are interchangeable between generations.

---

Is it worth buying Apple Watch Ultra 3 instead of Ultra 2?

For most users, the differences between Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 are not revolutionary, but real.
The new model is more efficient, lasts longer on battery, supports 5G and satellite communication, and has longer support.

When is it better to choose Ultra 3?

• if you do not yet have a watch from the Ultra series,
• if you often stay out of network coverage (mountains, sailing, travel),
• you want the most future-proof model with 5G and SOS via Satellite,
• you care about an AI trainer and longer battery life.

When is it better to buy Ultra 2?

• when you have a limited budget – the price difference is often 400–600 PLN,
• if you mainly use the watch in the city and do not need satellite connectivity,
• if you already have Ultra 2 – switching does not make much economic sense.

In terms of cost-effectiveness, a simple rule can be applied:

🔹 New users → choose Ultra 3
🔹 Ultra 2 owners → stick with the current model

---

📊 Summary: Apple Watch Ultra 3 vs Ultra 2

Aspekt	Lepszy wybór	Komentarz
Design i jakość wykonania	Remis	Oba modele z tytanu, ta sama solidność
Ekran	Ultra 3	Cieńsze ramki, nowszy panel LTPO3
Bateria	Ultra 3	+6 h przy typowym użytkowaniu
Łączność	Ultra 3	5G RedCap + SOS via Satellite
Funkcje zdrowotne	Ultra 3	Nowe algorytmy: nadciśnienie, Sleep Score
Funkcje sportowe	Remis	Workout Buddy (AI) tylko w Ultra 3
Cena	Ultra 2	Zazwyczaj tańszy o 400–600 zł
Wsparcie systemowe	Ultra 3	Do 2030 r. (vs 2028 r.)

---

💬 Opinie użytkowników i recenzje

Recenzenci (The Verge, Tom’s Guide, MacRumors) zgodnie podkreślają, że Ultra 3 to świetny smartwatch, ale bardziej dopracowanie niż rewolucja.
Nowe funkcje są wartościowe głównie dla osób, które potrzebują ich w praktyce (outdoor, bezpieczeństwo, sport).

„Ultra 3 jest dla tych, którzy jeszcze nie mają Ultra — dla posiadaczy Ultra 2 to raczej luksus, nie konieczność.” — The Verge

Users praise primarily the longer battery life, larger screen, and the sturdiness of the construction.
The most common conclusion: if this is your first Ultra – go for the «three»; if you have the «two» – wait for Ultra 4.

---

FAQ – frequently asked questions about Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2

⭐️ Is it worth buying Apple Watch Ultra 3 in 2025?
Yes, if you are just buying your first Apple Watch Ultra. The Ultra 3 model has a larger screen, longer battery life, satellite connectivity, and 5G support, making it the most future-proof choice. For Ultra 2 owners, the change is not necessary, as the differences are not revolutionary.

⭐️ What is the difference between Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2?
The Ultra 3 has a larger screen (1.99″ vs 1.92″), thinner bezels, a newer S10 processor, RedCap 5G connectivity, SOS via Satellite feature, and longer system support until 2030. The other elements – such as health sensors or durability – are practically identical.

⭐️ How long does the battery last in Apple Watch Ultra 3?
The watch lasts up to 42 hours with normal use and up to 72 hours in power-saving mode. Thanks to fast charging, just 15 minutes is enough to gain about 12 hours of use.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 work in Poland with 5G network?
Yes, it uses the 5G RedCap mode, which operates in Standalone (SA) 5G networks. Polish operators – including Plus, Orange, and T-Mobile – are gradually implementing this solution, so compatibility will expand.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 support SOS via satellite in Poland?
Yes, Apple has announced the availability of the Emergency SOS via Satellite feature for users in Poland and the entire EU. The service is free for the first 2 years after activating the watch.

⭐️ Do the bands and cases from Apple Watch Ultra 2 fit Ultra 3?
Yes. All accessories for the 49 mm case are fully compatible. Therefore, you can use your existing bands, cases, and chargers with the new model.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 have new health features?
Ultra 3 introduces hypertension notifications and the Sleep Score feature – a sleep quality assessment. Both models measure heart rate, ECG, SpO₂, and detect falls or accidents (Crash Detection).

⭐️ Is the Apple Watch Ultra 3 suitable for diving?
Yes. The watch is water-resistant up to 100 meters and meets the EN13319 standard, allowing it to be used as a dive computer up to a depth of 40 m. It also works in salt water and extreme temperatures.

⭐️ What are the prices of Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2 in Poland?
Ultra 3 costs around 3799 zł (premiere), while Ultra 2 is available from around 3399 zł. The difference of about 400–600 zł depends on the store and promotions. If Ultra 2 is significantly cheaper, it will still be a very good choice.

⭐️ Does Apple Watch Ultra 3 work without an iPhone?
Yes. Thanks to the eSIM module and cellular connectivity (LTE/5G), Ultra 3 can operate independently – receiving calls, messages, and GPS data without a phone nearby.

⭐️ Does Ultra 3 support Apple Pay and Siri in Polish?
Yes, the watch fully supports Apple Pay and Siri in Polish, both online and offline (thanks to on-device processing).

⭐️ Does Apple Watch Ultra 3 have a better screen than Ultra 2?
Yes. Although the brightness remains at 3000 nits, Ultra 3 has a newer LTPO OLED 3rd generation display, with thinner bezels and better viewing angles.

The latest iPad Pro with the M5 chip is an evolutionary upgrade from the M4 predecessor. It offers higher performance (especially in graphics and AI), faster connectivity (Wi‑Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, faster 5G), and support for fast charging. The iPad Pro M5 will be the best choice for professionals and the most demanding users, while the iPad Pro M4 will still perform excellently for those with slightly lower requirements – and at a lower price. 

📊iPad Pro M5 vs iPad Pro M4 – Comparison Table

Cecha	iPad Pro M4 11″	iPad Pro M4 12.9″	iPad Pro M5 11″	iPad Pro M5 13″
Wyświetlacz	11″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR, 120 Hz, HDR	12.9″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR	11″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR	13″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR
Procesor	Apple M4	Apple M4	Apple M5	Apple M5
RAM	8–16 GB	8–16 GB	12–16 GB	12–16 GB
Pamięć	256 GB – 2 TB SSD	256 GB – 2 TB SSD	256 GB – 2 TB (szybszy SSD)	256 GB – 2 TB (szybszy SSD)
Aparaty	12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR	12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR	bez zmian	bez zmian
Łączność	Wi-Fi 6E, BT 5.3	Wi-Fi 6E, BT 5.3	Wi-Fi 7, BT 6, 5G C1X	Wi-Fi 7, BT 6, 5G C1X
Ładowanie	ok. 20–30 W	ok. 20–30 W	Fast Charge (50% w 30 min)	Fast Charge (50% w 30 min)
System	iPadOS 17	iPadOS 17	iPadOS 26	iPadOS 26
Cena startowa	od 999 USD	od 1299 USD	od 999 USD	od 1299 USD

At first glance: iPad Pro M5 and M4 are very similar in terms of base specifications – both come in the same sizes and have fantastic OLED displays, identical cameras, and enclosures. The biggest differences lie in performance and internal components: the M5 chip delivers higher performance than the M4, M5 models have more RAM in cheaper configurations, as well as newer connectivity modules (Wi‑Fi 7, 5G C1X modem) and fast charging capability.

---

Screen and design – does the iPad Pro M5 have a better display than M4?

The same Ultra Retina XDR OLED screen

Both the iPad Pro M4 and M5 have the identical top-of-the-line Ultra Retina XDR OLED screen with ProMotion 120 Hz technology and full HDR support (1600 nit peak). It is the same tandem OLED panel that Apple introduced in 2024 and still has no competition in the tablet world.

The image quality is phenomenal: perfect blacks, high contrast, and a wide P3 color gamut. Both models provide smooth scrolling and responsiveness that no other tablet offers. In practice, you won’t notice a difference between the M4 and M5 screens – Apple didn’t need to change it, as it had already reached a «reference» level.

Design – cienki, lekki i solidny

Obie generacje iPadów Pro mają taką samą konstrukcję z aluminium lotniczego, z płaskimi krawędziami i bardzo małymi ramkami.
Wymiary i waga pozostały identyczne:

• iPad Pro 11″ – 5,3 mm grubości, ok. 470 g
• iPad Pro 13″ – 5,1 mm grubości, ok. 570 g

To wciąż najcieńsze tablety na rynku. Nowością w iPadzie Pro M5 jest kolor Space Black (czarny), który zastąpił dotychczasową gwiezdną szarość. Dla wielu użytkowników to drobna, ale pożądana zmiana estetyczna.

💡 Check also cases for iPad Pro 13″ or cases for iPad Pro 11″, to properly protect this ultra-thin design from scratches.

Front camera – now in a better place

The most practical change concerns the position of the front camera. In the iPad Pro M5, it has been moved to the longer edge, so during horizontal conversations you look directly into the lens.
In the M4, the camera was on the shorter side, so in horizontal orientation it gave the impression of a “side glance.” If you often hold online meetings or video lessons – this improvement really makes a difference.

---

Performance and computing power – Apple M5 vs M4

How big is the performance difference between M4 and M5?

The Apple M5 chip is an improved version of the M4 chip, made in the same 3 nm process, but with a new core architecture.

• CPU: up to 15% faster, with better power management,
• GPU: up to 40% more powerful, with support for 3rd generation ray tracing,
• Neural Engine: even 4× faster in AI tasks.

In everyday use (notes, browsing the web, movies) the differences are minimal. But if you work with RAW files, design in Procreate, edit 4K videos in LumaFusion, or use AI applications – M5 will provide a real increase in work comfort.

More RAM in cheaper models

This is a significant change.

• iPad Pro M4 (256/512 GB) → 8 GB RAM
• iPad Pro M5 (256/512 GB) → 12 GB RAM

For demanding applications, this is a big difference – M5 handles multitasking better and keeps more projects open without refreshing. The 1 TB and 2 TB versions in both models have 16 GB RAM.

Faster disk and memory

M5 korzysta z nowszych modułów SSD NVMe, oferujących nawet 2× szybszy odczyt i zapis danych. Zwiększono też przepustowość pamięci do 153 GB/s (z 120 GB/s w M4).
Efekt: krótsze czasy ładowania aplikacji, szybsze przenoszenie dużych plików i płynniejsze działanie w profesjonalnych aplikacjach.

---

Bateria i ładowanie – czy iPad Pro M5 działa dłużej?

Czas pracy

Apple deklaruje taki sam czas działania: do 10 godzin Wi-Fi lub 9 godzin w sieci 5G.
W praktyce iPad Pro M5 ma nieco lepszą efektywność energetyczną – dzięki nowszemu procesorowi i modemowi zużywa mniej energii pod dużym obciążeniem (np. podczas streamingu 4K czy pracy na 5G).

Szybkie ładowanie – wreszcie!

The biggest novelty is fast charge.
The iPad Pro M5 can be charged up to 50% in about 30 minutes using a 40W or stronger power adapter (e.g., a MacBook charger).
The M4 model did not support fast charging and needed over an hour for a similar result.
This is a huge advantage if you use the iPad outdoors or want to quickly recharge it between meetings.

🔋 See also tempered glass for iPad Pro 13″ and glass for iPad Pro 11″, if you want to protect the screen from damage during everyday use or charging in a bag.

---

Cameras and multimedia – does M5 take better photos?

Rear setup unchanged

Both models have the same layout:

• main camera 12 Mpix (f/1.8),
• ultra-wide 10 Mpix (123°),
• LiDAR scanner for AR and autofocus.

The quality of photos and 4K video remains the same. Apple did not change the sensors or optics. These are solid cameras for scans and recordings, but they still do not match the Pro iPhones.

Front camera – practical change

The 12 Mpix module with Center Stage remains the same, but its position (on the longer side in M5) significantly improves the comfort of video conferencing.

Sound and multimedia

The system of four stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos remains unchanged. The sound is still fantastic – full and loud, even without headphones.
Both iPads lack a 3.5 mm Jack socket, but you can use USB-C or Bluetooth headphones.

---

Connectivity and accessories – what’s new in the iPad Pro M5?

Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6

The new connectivity chip in M5 supports the Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) standard, providing higher speeds and lower latencies.
M4 remains with Wi-Fi 6E.
Bluetooth 6 allows simultaneous audio connections and better energy management – these are future-proof features that you will appreciate over time.

5G C1X modem

The iPad Pro M5 received Apple’s proprietary C1X modem instead of the Qualcomm chip. It is even 50% faster and consumes less energy.
If you often work in the field, M5 will provide more stable connections and fewer signal «drops».

Accessory compatibility

Full compatibility in both directions:

• Apple Pencil 2 and Apple Pencil Pro work with M4 and M5,
• Magic Keyboard (old and new with function keys) fits both models,
• the same Smart Connector and magnetic mounts.

No need to buy new accessories when changing iPads – that’s a big plus.

Is it worth paying extra for the iPad Pro M5?

When to choose M5

• You work with video, 3D graphics, design, or AI.
• You often use a 5G modem and care about faster transmission.
• You need fast-charge and modern connectivity standards.
• You want hardware with longer system support (iPadOS 26+).

When M4 is enough

• Używasz iPada do notatek, filmów, gier i codziennych zadań.
• Nie potrzebujesz najszybszych sieci ani szybkiego ładowania.
• Liczy się dla Ciebie niższa cena – M4 oferuje 90 % możliwości M5, często w promocji tańszy o kilkaset złotych.

---

❓ FAQ – najczęstsze pytania o iPad Pro M5 vs iPad Pro M4

🔹 Jaka jest główna różnica między iPad Pro M5 a M4?

iPad Pro M5 ma nowszy procesor Apple M5, szybsze GPU i AI, więcej RAM w tańszych modelach oraz obsługuje szybkie ładowanie. Reszta (ekran, obudowa, aparaty) pozostała bez zmian.

🔹 Czy iPad Pro M5 ma lepszy ekran?

Nie. Oba iPady Pro mają ten sam ekran Ultra Retina XDR OLED 120 Hz, o jasności do 1600 nitów.

🔹 Czy warto dopłacić do iPada Pro M5?

Tak – jeśli używasz iPada do grafiki, wideo, projektów 3D lub AI.
Nie – jeśli korzystasz głównie z multimediów i notatek.

🔹 Czy iPad Pro M5 ma szybszy procesor?

Yes, the processor Apple M5 is about ~15% faster in CPU and up to 40% faster in GPU than M4.

🔹 How much RAM do the iPad Pro M4 and M5 have?

M4: 8 GB (256/512 GB) or 16 GB (1–2 TB)
M5: 12 GB (256/512 GB) or 16 GB (1–2 TB)

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a longer battery life?

Unofficially – slightly longer under heavy load, but Apple claims the same 10 h.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 support fast charging?

Yes. It supports fast-charge 50% in 30 min (charger ≥ 40 W).

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M4 support fast charging?

No. M4 charges normally (20–30 W), without fast-charge mode.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a better camera?

No. The cameras are identical (12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR), only the position of the front camera differs – in M5 it is on the side.

🔹 Is the camera on the iPad Pro M5 better for video calls?

Yes, because it has been moved to the longer edge – now you look straight into the lens during a call.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have Wi-Fi 7?

Yes, M5 supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6. M4 has Wi-Fi 6E and BT 5.3.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a new 5G modem?

Yes. M5 uses the Apple C1X modem – faster and more energy-efficient than Qualcomm in M4.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 work with Apple Pencil Pro?

Yes. Apple Pencil Pro works with the iPad Pro M5 and M4.

🔹 Do accessories from the iPad Pro M4 fit M5?

Yes – full compatibility. Magic Keyboard, Apple Pencil, and other accessories work on both models.

The series Xiaomi 17 is a significant step forward compared to Xiaomi 15. All models – from the basic to Pro Max – bring the new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, better Leica cameras, larger batteries (up to 7500 mAh) and the latest HyperOS 3.0 system based on Android 16.
On the other hand, Xiaomi 15 still remains a great choice for those looking for top performance at a lower price.

Comparison table Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17

Specyfikacja	Xiaomi 15 / 15 Pro / 15 Pro Max	Xiaomi 17 / 17 Pro / 17 Pro Max
Data premiery	IV kw. 2024 (globalnie)	III kw. 2025 (Chiny), globalnie 2026
System / UI	Android 15, HyperOS 2.0	Android 16, HyperOS 3.0
Ekran	6,36″ LTPO AMOLED (3200 nit HDR, 120 Hz) – Pro / Pro Max do 6,7″	6,3″ LTPO AMOLED (3500 nit HDR, 120 Hz) – Pro / Pro Max z ekranem tylnym OLED (2,7–2,9″)
Procesor	Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm, Oryon V2 do 4,32 GHz)	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm, Oryon V3 do 4,6 GHz)
GPU	Adreno 830	Adreno 840
RAM / pamięć	12/16 GB LPDDR5x, 256/512 GB UFS 4.0 (1 TB w Pro Max)	12/16 GB LPDDR5x, 256/512 GB UFS 4.1 (1 TB w Pro / Pro Max)
Aparat tylny	50 MP (f/1.6, OIS) + 50 MP szeroki (115°) + 50 MP tele 2,6× (Pro 5×)	50 MP (f/1.7, Leica, OIS) + 50 MP szeroki (102° lub makro 5 cm) + 50 MP tele 2,6× / 5×
Aparat przedni	32 MP (f/2.0), bez AF (Pro z AF)	50 MP (f/2.2, PDAF) z autofokusem
Bateria	5240–6100 mAh (15–Pro Max), 90 W / 50 W	6300–7500 mAh (17–Pro Max), 120 W / 50 W
Łączność	5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, Dual SIM + eSIM, USB-C 3.2 DP, IP68	5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, UWB (Pro / Pro Max), USB-C 3.2 DP, IP68
Szkło / inne	Dragon Glass 2, czytnik ultradźwiękowy	Dragon Glass 3, UWB, ekran tylny (Pro / Pro Max)
Cena (start)	od ok. 3779 zł (12/256 GB, PL 2025)	podobny poziom cenowy w Chinach – PL premiera 2026

Performance of Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17

Which one is faster?

Both smartphones are powered by top Qualcomm processors. Xiaomi 15 uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) with Oryon V2 cores (up to 4.32 GHz) and Adreno 830 graphics, while Xiaomi 17 received the newer Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) with Oryon V3 cores (up to 4.6 GHz) and Adreno 840 graphics.

In practice, this translates to a noticeable increase in performance. According to the manufacturer, the unit in Xiaomi 17 is 20–50% faster than in Xiaomi 15. Benchmarks confirm this data – GeekBench indicates around 3440 pts (single-core) for Xiaomi 17 vs 2769 pts for Xiaomi 15, and AnTuTu gives a clear advantage to the new model.

In everyday use

Both smartphones offer 12 or 16 GB of LPDDR5x memory, ensuring smooth operation of the system and games. However, Xiaomi 17 handles multitasking better, loads applications faster, and maintains high performance longer under heavy load. For gamers and demanding users – the choice is obvious.

---

Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17 Display

Does Xiaomi 17 have a better display than Xiaomi 15?

• Xiaomi 15 has an LTPO AMOLED panel with a diagonal of 6.36″, a resolution of 2670 × 1200 px (~460 ppi), and a variable refresh rate from 1 to 120 Hz. The maximum brightness reached 3200 nits.
• Xiaomi 17 offers an LTPO AMOLED display with a diagonal of 6.3″, a resolution of 2656 × 1220 px (~464 ppi) with an adaptive refresh rate of 1-120 Hz, but with a maximum brightness of up to 3500 nits and Dragon Crystal Glass 3 protective glass.

🔎 What does this mean in practice

• In strong sunlight conditions, the Xiaomi 17 screen will be more readable due to its higher brightness – which translates to better visibility outdoors.
• LTPO z zakresem 1–120 Hz oznacza, że częstotliwość odświeżania może być dynamicznie dopasowana w zależności od treści, co pomaga w oszczędzaniu baterii – obie generacje mają tę funkcję, ale 17-tka to bardziej dopracowane rozwiązanie.
• Wyższa jasność i nowsze szkło ochronne w Xiaomi 17 oznaczają także lepszą wytrzymałość i mniejsze ryzyko refleksów lub utraty czytelności w słońcu.
• Choć zmiana rozmiaru ekranu jest minimalna (6,36″ → 6,3″), Xiaomi 17 zyskuje na kompaktowości i lepszym stosunku proporcji, przy jednoczesnym zachowaniu znakomitej jakości obrazu.

W serii Xiaomi 17 (Pro i Pro Max) pojawiają się dodatkowe ulepszenia:

• Dla wariantów Pro i Pro Max dostępny jest ekran pomocniczy z tyłu obudowy o przekątnej ok. 2,7″-2,9″ – który może służyć jako podgląd aparatów lub wyświetlać powiadomienia. 
• Wyższa jasność (3500 nitów) utrzymana również w Pro/Pro Max, co oznacza, że niezależnie od wersji otrzymujesz topowy panel.

✅ Wniosek

Jeżeli priorytetem jest najlepszy ekran — czyli doskonała jasność, szybka adaptacja odświeżania i lepsze szkło ochronne — wtedy Xiaomi 17 wypada lepiej niż Xiaomi 15. Jeśli jednak używasz smartfona głównie w normalnych warunkach i nie zależy Ci na ekstremalnej jasności czy ekranie tylnym w wersji Pro/Pro Max — ekran Xiaomi 15 wciąż sprosta większości zastosowań.

👉 Sprawdź szkło hartowane do Xiaomi 15

---

Aparat Leica w Xiaomi 15 i 17

Który robi lepsze zdjęcia?

W sekcji aparatów oba smartfony stoją na bardzo wysokim poziomie, ale Xiaomi 17 wprowadza kilka znaczących ulepszeń w porównaniu do Xiaomi 15.

• W Xiaomi 15: tylny zestaw trzech aparatów 50 MP (główny f/1.62 + ultraszeroki f/2.2 + tele f/2.0, 2,6× zoom) zgodnie z testem DXOMARK.
• W Xiaomi 17: również trzy aparaty po 50 MP każdy, ale z nowszym sensorem Light Fusion 950 (1/1.31″, f/1.67) i ultrawide 50 MP f/2.4, tele 50 MP 2,6× zoom (a w wariantach Pro/Pro Max nawet 5× zoom optyczny). 
• Kamera przednia w Xiaomi 17: 50 MP z PDAF i autofokusem — w Xiaomi 15 było 32 MP bez AF

What does it mean in practice?

• Better photo quality in low light: a larger sensor and improved lens in Xiaomi 17 mean more light, less noise, and better dynamic range (in Pro/Pro Max versions with LOFIC technology for 16.5 EV). 
• Better zooms: the basic model 17 maintains a 2.6× zoom, but the Pro and Pro Max versions are equipped with a 5× telephoto lens with a larger sensor – providing a real advantage when photographing from a distance. 
• Higher selfie detail: 50 MP with autofocus in 17 is definitely an improved front camera compared to 32 MP without AF in 15.
• New features and processing: The 17 series uses newer Leica AI algorithms and better optics — effectively improving colors, contrast, and depth.

✅ Conclusions

If the camera is a priority for you, then the Xiaomi 17 takes photography and video to the next level: better zooms, better sensor, more details.
However, if your needs are standard — photos, videos, social media — the Xiaomi 15 still delivers great results and may be a more cost-effective choice.

🛒 Check out case for Xiaomi 15 at Home Screen store

---

Battery and charging – Xiaomi 17 outclasses its predecessor

How long does Xiaomi 17 last?

The biggest advancement between the Xiaomi 15 and 17 series concerns the battery and energy efficiency.

• Xiaomi 15 offered a battery capacity of 5240 mAh,
• Xiaomi 15 Pro – about 5700 mAh,
• Xiaomi 15 Pro Max – about 6100 mAh.

The new generation goes a step further:

• Xiaomi 17 has 7000 mAh,
• Xiaomi 17 Pro – 6300 mAh,
• Xiaomi 17 Pro Max – up to 7500 mAh, making it one of the most powerful flagships on the market.

The difference is huge – in practice, the 17 series lasts even 40–60% longer on a single charge than the 15 series.
The new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chips, manufactured using a 3 nm process, are more energy efficient, so even more powerful devices consume less energy.

⚡ Charging Speed

• Xiaomi 15 / Pro / Pro Max: 90 W wired + 50 W wireless + 22.5 W reverse charging.
• Xiaomi 17 / Pro / Pro Max: up to 120 W wired, 50 W wireless, 22.5 W reverse.

This means that even the massive 7500 mAh battery in the Pro Max model can be fully charged in about 25 minutes, while the smaller Xiaomi 17 can replenish its energy in just under 20 minutes.

In practice:

• 10 minut ładowania to ok. 50 % energii,
• 30 minut – pełne naładowanie,
• a 50 W bezprzewodowe działa stabilnie nawet z ładowarkami Qi2.

✅ Wniosek

Seria Xiaomi 17 to nie tylko więcej mocy, ale też rekordowy czas pracy na baterii.
Model 17 Pro Max z ogniwem 7500 mAh i ładowaniem 120 W to jeden z najwydajniejszych flagowców 2025/2026 roku. Jeśli bateria i szybkie ładowanie są dla Ciebie priorytetem – to właśnie ta wersja zdecydowanie deklasuje poprzednią serię 15.

👉 Sprawdź szybkie ładowarki do Xiaomi 17

---

System i funkcje

Co nowego wnosi HyperOS 3.0 i Android 16?

W serii Xiaomi 17 zastosowano najnowszą wersję interfejsu — HyperOS 3.0, działającą na bazie Androida 16. System wprowadza m.in.:

• odświeżony interfejs z szybszymi animacjami i mniejszym opóźnieniem,
• better energy management and RAM optimization — which positively affects smooth operation and multitasking,
• new “Cross-Device” features and AI assistants that better integrate the phone with other Xiaomi devices (e.g., TV, headphones, tablet).
  Additionally, the HyperOS 3.0 update in the 17 models has been confirmed with version 3.0.17.0, containing stability fixes and optimizations for the rear screen and gaming. 

🔹 Pro and Pro Max versions – rear screen, UWB, and advanced features

In the 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max models, hardware and software features not available in the base version have been added:

• rear OLED screen (“Dynamic Back Display”) with a diagonal of ~2.7″–2.9″, allowing for camera preview, notifications, or wallpaper personalization. 
• support for UWB (Ultra Wide Band) technology – used for precise device location and better integration with accessories (e.g., headphones, locators).
• better cooling, larger memory (up to 1 TB), which translates to even smoother operation and greater future-proofing of the smartphone.

---

Price and availability

which Xiaomi is more worth it?

Xiaomi 17 debuted in China in October 2025 and will hit the global market in 2026. Prices remain similar to Xiaomi 15 – around 4500 PLN for the 12/256 GB version.

Xiaomi 15 is already available in Poland and currently costs around 3779 PLN, and after the release of the newer model, it will be possible to buy it even cheaper.

💸 Conclusion: if you want to save money – choose Xiaomi 15. If you care about maximum performance and battery – Xiaomi 17 will be a better choice.

---

🏁 Final opinion – which model to choose?

After analyzing all key aspects — performance, screen, cameras, battery, system, and price — here’s a summary of which model will be the best in a specific situation:

✅ If you care about maximum performance and the best possible smartphone for years, choose:

• Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — largest display (6.9″), huge battery (~7500 mAh), 5× optical zoom, rear OLED screen, full UWB support, latest processor.
• Xiaomi 17 Pro — if you want a compromise: basically the same components as in Pro Max, but slightly smaller dimensions and lower price.

✅ If you want a great flagship, but don’t necessarily need absolutely top parameters – for many users the best choice will be:

• Xiaomi 17 – the “basic” flagship of the 17 series: Gen 5 processor, large battery (~7000 mAh), improved camera and screen — still a huge leap compared to the 15 series, but in a more accessible size.

💡 If you have a limited budget or don’t need all the “features” of the new generation — the ideal choice will be:

• Xiaomi 15 – great performance, very good camera set, compact form and attractive price. It is still a flagship that will meet expectations in everyday use.

📣 Śledź nas na bieżąco – kiedy Xiaomi 17 będzie dostępny w Polsce, znajdziesz u nas wszystkie akcesoria do Xiaomi 17: etui, szkła ochronne, ładowarki i więcej!

---

⭐ FAQ – najczęściej zadawane pytania o Xiaomi 15 i Xiaomi 17

⭐ Czy etui od Xiaomi 15 pasuje na Xiaomi 17?

Nie, każdy z modeli ma inne wymiary i rozmieszczenie aparatów. Etui z serii 15 nie będzie pasować na Xiaomi 17 – warto dobrać dedykowane akcesoria.

---

⭐ Czy Xiaomi 17 ma lepszy aparat od Xiaomi 15?

Tak – przede wszystkim dzięki nowej matrycy Light Fusion 950 oraz 50 MP aparacie selfie z autofokusem. Wersje Pro i Pro Max oferują też 5× zoom optyczny i lepsze zdjęcia nocne.

---

⭐ Jak długo działa Xiaomi 17 na baterii?

Zależnie od modelu, od 9 do 12 godzin SoT (ekranu na włączonym).
Wersja Pro Max z baterią 7500 mAh może działać nawet dwa dni bez ładowania przy umiarkowanym użytkowaniu.

---

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 have wireless charging?

Yes, the entire 17 series supports 50 W wireless charging and 22.5 W reverse charging, allowing you to power headphones, a smartwatch, or another phone.

---

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 have a rear screen?

Yes, the Pro and Pro Max versions have an additional 2.7–2.9 inch OLED screen on the back panel – for selfies, notifications, and personalization.

---

⭐ Is it worth buying Xiaomi 15 in 2025?

Yes. Despite the launch of the 17 series, Xiaomi 15 is still one of the best-priced flagships – it offers high performance, an AMOLED display, and Leica cameras, and its price has dropped below 3800 PLN.

---

⭐ When will Xiaomi 17 be available in Poland?

The global premiere is scheduled for Q1 2026 Then the 17 series will be available for official sale in Europe.

---

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 support UWB and the latest AI features?

Yes – the 17 Pro and Pro Max models have an UWB (Ultra Wide Band) module and AI features in HyperOS 3.0 (e.g. scene recognition, speech transcription, interface personalization).

---

⭐ How much do Xiaomi 15 and Xiaomi 17 cost in Poland?

Xiaomi 17 (12/256 GB) – estimated around 4,500 PLN after global launch

Xiaomi 15 (12/256 GB) – approx. 3,779 PLN

---

Nowy Poco F8 Ultra oferuje większą baterię (6500 mAh), lepszy aparat (peryskop 5x), głośniki z subwooferem Bose i topowy procesor Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. Starszy F7 Ultra nadal kusi ostrzejszym ekranem WQHD+, szybszym ładowaniem 120 W i niższą ceną.

📊 Tabela porównawcza: Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs F8 Ultra

Parametr	Poco F7 Ultra	Poco F8 Ultra
Ekran	6,67″ WQHD+ AMOLED, 120 Hz	6,9″ AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz
Procesor	Snapdragon 8 Elite	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Aparat (tył)	50 + 50 (tele 2.5x) + 32 Mpix (ultra)	50 + 50 (peryskop 5x) + 50 Mpix (ultra)
Aparat (przód)	32 Mpix, FHD wideo	32 Mpix, 4K wideo
Bateria	5300 mAh	6500 mAh
Ładowanie	120 W przewodowe, 50 W bezprzewodowe	100 W przewodowe, 50 W bezprz., 22,5 W zwrotne
Audio	Stereo 2.0 (Dolby Atmos)	Stereo 2.1 + subwoofer Bose
System	Android 15, HyperOS 2	Android 16, HyperOS 3
Łączność	5G, Wi-Fi 7-ready, Bluetooth 5.4, IR, NFC	5G + eSIM, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, IR, NFC
Cena (PL)	1875 zł (12/256 GB), 1999,99 zł (16/512 GB)	2699 zł (12/256 GB), 2999 zł (16/512 GB)

What does the Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra casing look like?

What distinguishes the Denim Blue version with Bose subwoofer?

Poco F8 Ultra in the Denim Blue variant stands out with its vivid, unique design. The back with a texture resembling denim fabric gives the device a stylish yet modern character. It is not real fabric, but the visual and tactile effect is very realistic. At the top of the casing, there is a Bose logo, indicating an unusual addition – a third low-frequency speaker acting as a subwoofer. As a result, the F8 Ultra offers fuller, deeper sound than most smartphones – especially when playing music and movies without headphones.

Are both smartphones waterproof?

Both Poco F7 Ultra and F8 Ultra are designed with everyday durability in mind. Both models feature a metal frame, which ensures structural solidity and an elegant finish. Additionally, they meet the IP68 standard, meaning they are resistant to dust and immersion in water – up to a depth of 1.5 m for a maximum of 30 minutes. This is a useful feature, especially in the rain, during workouts, or on vacation.

Dimensions and comfort – which model fits better in hand?

Model	Dimensions (mm)	Weight
F8 Ultra	163.33 × 77.82 × 8.05	220 g
F7 Ultra	160.26 × 74.95 × 8.39	212 g

F8 Ultra has slightly larger dimensions, but at the same time is thinner than its predecessor. With rounded edges and a well-balanced center of gravity, it remains comfortable to use, even with one hand. F7 Ultra is lighter and narrower – more compact, which may be appreciated by those who prefer smaller devices.

What colors are the models available in?

• Poco F7 Ultra: classic black and intense, recognizable yellow

• Poco F8 Ultra: elegant black, pure white and unique Denim Blue

The Denim Blue version is the strongest stylistic accent in the POCO offer – it combines aesthetics with functionality (Bose speaker) and makes the device stand out from the competition.

➡️ Check the case for Poco F7 Ultra, if you want to protect the device without losing style.

➡️ In the case of F8 Ultra, check accessories for Poco F8 Ultra – you will soon find all the necessary additions there, such as tempered glass for Poco F8 Ultra or case for Poco F8 Ultra.

---

Poco F8 Ultra display vs F7 Ultra

Larger screen vs higher resolution – which gives a better effect?

Poco F8 Ultra has a larger, 6.90-inch AMOLED LTPS display with a resolution of 1200 × 2608 px (~416 ppi). The 19.5:9 aspect ratio makes the screen wider and more spacious, ideal for movies, multitasking, and gaming.

Poco F7 Ultra has a smaller, but noticeably sharper screen: 6.67″ WQHD+ (1440 × 3200 px), which gives as much as ~526 ppi. This is noticeably better detail, especially when reading small fonts or browsing photos.

Refresh rate and brightness – can you see the differences?

• Both models offer smooth 120 Hz, HDR10+ and Dolby Vision.
• F8 Ultra: up to 3500 nits brightness – the screen is great to see in sunlight.
• F7 Ultra: also very bright (up to 3200 nits), but slightly lags behind the newer model.

In summary:

•  F7 Ultra – more detailed image, ideal for working with text
• F8 Ultra – larger, brighter screen, great for multimedia

---

Processor and performance – which Poco is stronger in everyday use?

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Elite Gen 5 – how do they perform in tests?

Poco F7 Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB) processor with a clock speed of up to 4.32 GHz. At the time of its release, it was one of the most powerful mobile chips, offering excellent performance in games and applications.

F8 Ultra goes a step further — it features the latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) with a clock speed of up to 4.6 GHz and improved energy architecture (3 nm). In benchmarks like AnTuTu, the differences are clear:

• AnTuTu: F8 Ultra approaches 3.86 million points, F7 Ultra around 2.63 million
• Geekbench: F8 Ultra has about 24–25% higher single-core and multi-core performance

RAM and storage – has anything changed?

Both smartphones offer top configurations:

• 12 GB or 16 GB LPDDR5X RAM
• 256 GB or 512 GB UFS 4.1 storage
• ❌ No microSD card slot – you cannot expand the storage

System performance, loading applications or games with maximum details – in both cases it works great, but F8 Ultra provides a greater power reserve for the future.

Summary:

---

Camera – is Poco F8 Ultra the new leader in mobile photography?

What can the main lenses in F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra do?

Both models have very good, 50-megapixel main cameras with a large aperture (f/1.6–1.7) and optical image stabilization (OIS). This guarantees great photos during the day, good effects after dark, and smooth shots in motion.

However, differences appear with additional lenses.

Poco F8 Ultra – strong advantage in zoom and wide angle

• Ultrawide angle: 50 Mpix (vs 32 Mpix in F7 Ultra) – better detail and less distortion
• Periscope telephoto lens: 50 Mpix with 5x optical zoom and OIS (vs 2.5x zoom in F7 Ultra)
•  Front camera: 32 Mpix – in F8 Ultra records 4K, in F7 Ultra only 1080p

F8 Ultra zapewnia lepsze zbliżenia, więcej detali i bardziej zaawansowane możliwości fotograficzne. Dodatkowo dzięki peryskopowi zdjęcia z dużej odległości zachowują ostrość i jakość.

F7 Ultra – nadal bardzo solidna optyka

• Świetny aparat główny z OIS
• 2,5x zoom optyczny przy teleobiektywie
• Dobre ujęcia dzienne i nocne
• Selfie z przodu w 32 Mpix

W skrócie:

•  F8 Ultra – lepszy zoom, lepszy szeroki kąt, lepsze wideo z selfie
•  F7 Ultra – dobry aparat główny, przyzwoity teleobiektyw

---

Bateria i ładowanie – który Poco działa dłużej, a który ładuje się szybciej?

Who has a bigger battery and better runtime?

POCO F8 Ultra clearly wins in terms of capacity – it has a 6500 mAh battery that provides a very long operating time even with intensive use. POCO F7 Ultra has a slightly smaller battery 5300 mAh, which also lasts all day, but offers a shorter screen-on time.

How does fast charging and wireless technology look?

F7 Ultra supports very fast 120 W wired charging (full charge in about 30 minutes), as well as 50 W wireless and 10–15 W reverse charging.
F8 Ultra supports 100 W wired charging, 50 W wireless and 22.5 W reverse charging.

Which model is better in terms of charging and battery?

•  F8 Ultra – longer operating time, larger capacity, and stronger reverse charging
• F7 Ultra – faster wired charging, slightly smaller battery

➡️ Do you need fast charging? Check available fast chargers for Poco F8 Ultra, compatible with Power Delivery technology.

➡️ For the older model, there are also chargers for Poco F7 Ultra, perfect for fully utilizing its capabilities.

---

System and software – does the new Android and HyperOS make a difference?

Android 16 vs Android 15 – what has changed?

Poco F8 Ultra debuts with the latest system Android 16, complemented by HyperOS 3, which is the next version of the Xiaomi overlay created after moving away from MIUI. This system offers better optimization, AI support, smoother animations, and better integration with other Xiaomi devices.

Poco F7 Ultra uses Android 15 and HyperOS 2, which still provides great smoothness, but may receive one update less in the future.

What does HyperOS offer in practice?

• Advanced interface customization
• Intelligent memory manager
• Gaming mode and advanced sound options
• Longer support for F8 Ultra (Android updates + security)

In everyday use, both phones operate very smoothly. But if you care about longer support and newer AI features, F8 Ultra is a better future-proof choice.

---

Memory and storage – is it worth paying extra for the 512 GB version?

What memory variants do Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra offer?

Both models are available in identical configurations:

• 12 GB or 16 GB RAM (standard LPDDR5X – fast and energy-efficient)
• 256 GB or 512 GB internal storage (UFS 4.1 – very fast read/write)

This means that regardless of the model, you can count on top performance in multitasking, gaming, video editing, or storing large files.

Can memory be expanded with a microSD card?

❌ Unfortunately no. Neither F8 Ultra nor F7 Ultra have a memory card slot. This means that it is worth deciding on the right capacity right away – if you take a lot of photos, record 4K video, use many games or offline applications, the 512 GB variant will be a safer choice.

Short comparison:

• Both models offer fast memory and a large amount of RAM
• No microSD – the choice of capacity matters right away
• F8 Ultra with 512 GB is a sensible investment «for years»

---

Connectivity and sound – which Poco has better audio and eSIM?

Do both models have 5G, Wi-Fi 7 and modern ports?

Yes – both Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra support the latest connectivity standards:

• 5G dual SIM (supports two nanoSIM cards simultaneously)
• Wi-Fi 7 – the fastest standard, backward compatible with Wi-Fi 6 and 5
• Bluetooth:
  • F8 Ultra: 6.0
  • F7 Ultra: 5.4
• NFC – for contactless payments on both
• USB-C:
  • F8 Ultra: USB 3.2
  • F7 Ultra: USB 2.0
• F8 Ultra additionally supports eSIM – a convenient solution for travelers

Does the sound differ as well?

Definitely yes! Poco F8 Ultra has an advantage in the audio system:

• F8 Ultra: the first smartphone with triple 2.1 speaker system – two stereo + Bose subwoofer
• F7 Ultra: stereo with Dolby

---

Which Poco Ultra is worth choosing?

Poco F8 Ultra is a more modern, more powerful, and more multimedia-oriented model:

✅ larger battery (6500 mAh)
✅ stronger processor (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5)
✅ better additional cameras (5x zoom, 50 Mpix ultra wide)
✅ higher screen brightness and Bose subwoofer
✅ eSIM, USB 3.2, longer software support

On the other hand, Poco F7 Ultra still has its strengths:

✅ sharper screen (WQHD+)
✅ faster charging (120 W)
✅ solid camera set and great design
✅ often lower price (especially the 12/256 GB version)

In summary:

• Choose Poco F8 Ultra if you care about maximum performance, cameras, and sound
• Go for F7 Ultra if you want a great flagship at a better price and with a sharper screen

---

Frequently asked questions about Poco F8 Ultra and Poco F7 Ultra

---

What screen does the Poco F8 Ultra have and is it better than the F7 Ultra?

• The Poco F8 Ultra has a larger 6.9″ AMOLED screen (~1.5K) with very high brightness – up to 3500 nits.
• The Poco F7 Ultra has a sharper 6.67″ WQHD+ display (526 ppi).
• Choose the F8 Ultra if visibility is important to you, or the F7 Ultra if you value image sharpness.

---

Does the Poco F8 Ultra have better sound than the F7 Ultra?

• Yes – the F8 Ultra offers a unique 2.1 speaker system with a Bose subwoofer.
• This is the first Poco smartphone with a dedicated subwoofer.

---

Does the Poco F8 Ultra have eSIM and USB 3.2?

• Yes, the F8 Ultra supports eSIM and fast USB-C 3.2.
• The F7 Ultra does not offer eSIM and uses a USB 2.0 port.

---

Which model has a better camera: Poco F7 Ultra or F8 Ultra?

• F8 Ultra has 3 cameras 50 Mpix (main, ultra wide, and tele 5x), each with OIS.
• F7 Ultra has a weaker ultra-wide (32 Mpix) and a 2.5x telephoto lens.
• F8 Ultra wins in terms of zoom, detail, and night shots.

---

How long does the battery last in Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra?

• F8 Ultra has a larger 6500 mAh battery and lasts noticeably longer.
• F7 Ultra with 5300 mAh charges faster (120 W), but offers shorter usage time.

---

Is it worth buying Poco F8 Ultra in 2025?

• Yes, Poco F8 Ultra is one of the most advanced smartphones in its class. Great performance, triple 50 Mpix camera, and Bose subwoofer make it still a very worthwhile choice.

The best case for Pixel 10a is Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN) — transparent with raised edges and Air Cushion technology. The cheapest? Bizon Case Salpa for 25 PLN. The Pixel 10a has a plastic back, so a case is not a luxury, but a necessity.

Google Pixel 10a debuted on March 5, 2026. For 549 EUR, you get a Tensor G4 processor, a 48 MP camera with OIS, a 120 Hz display with Gorilla Glass 7i, and a 5100 mAh battery with 30W charging. It’s a great smartphone for its price — but it has a plastic back that scratches easily.

In this guide, you will find the best accessories for Pixel 10a: cases from 25 PLN, tempered glass, and chargers that utilize the full potential of 30W fast charging.

Tip: The Pixel 10a supports 10W Qi wireless charging, but it does not have native MagSafe or Qi2. Cases with a magnetic ring (e.g., Tech-Protect or Ringke MagSafe) add compatibility with MagSafe accessories.

Ranking: 5 best cases for Pixel 10a

1. Spigen Ultra Hybrid — transparent with Air Cushion (59 PLN)

Our choice

Spigen Ultra Hybrid is a proven series — transparent polycarbonate back with a flexible TPU frame. Air Cushion technology in the corners absorbs impacts, and the raised edges protect the screen and camera.

• Air Cushion Technology — air cushions in the corners
• Transparent back — shows the original color of the Pixel 10a
• Raised edges — protection for the screen and camera
• Precise cutouts for all ports and buttons

Pixel 10a has a flat camera module (without a protruding «island»), so the case sits perfectly on any surface. For 59 PLN you get the proven quality of Spigen and assurance of fit.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU + polycarbonate
Type	Transparent
MagSafe	❌
Price	59 zł

2. Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe — magnetic transparent (65 zł)

Pixel 10a does not have native MagSafe, but Ringke Fusion Magnetic adds a built-in magnetic ring. With it, you can use magnetic chargers, power banks, and car mounts — just like iPhone users.

• Built-in MagSafe ring — compatibility with magnetic chargers and accessories
• Transparent polycarbonate — resistant to yellowing
• Podniesione krawędzie wokół ekranu i aparatu
• Precyzyjne wycięcia na USB-C i głośniki

Za 65 zł to najdroższe etui w zestawieniu, ale jedyne przezroczyste z pełnym MagSafe. Jeśli planujesz używać ładowarek bezprzewodowych lub uchwytów magnetycznych, to najlepszy wybór.

Parametr	Wartość
Materiał	TPU + poliwęglan
Typ	Przezroczyste
MagSafe	✅
Cena	65 zł

3. Tech-Protect Flexair Hybrid MagSafe — budżetowy MagSafe (35 zł)

Najlepsza cena z MagSafe

Tech-Protect Flexair is half the price of Ringke, yet offers the same key features: a transparent hybrid with a built-in magnetic ring. The hybrid construction (TPU + PC) combines the flexibility of the frame with a hard, scratch-resistant back.

• MagSafe — built-in magnetic ring
• Hybrid TPU + PC — rigid back, flexible frame
• Transparent — visible original color of the phone
• Raised edges around the screen and camera

At 35 zł, it offers the best price-to-functionality ratio in the comparison. If you want MagSafe for the Pixel 10a and don’t want to overpay, Tech-Protect Flexair is a perfect choice.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU + polycarbonate
Type	Transparent
MagSafe	✅
Price	35 zł

4. 3MK Armor Case — armored protection (49.90 zł)

3MK Armor Case is a rugged case with reinforced corners and a textured back that won’t slip from your hand. The design absorbs impacts more effectively than standard TPU cases.

• Reinforced corners — enhanced protection against drops
• Textured back — non-slip surface
• Matte finish — does not collect fingerprints
• Raised edges around the screen and camera

The plastic back of the Pixel 10a is particularly prone to scratches. The 3MK Armor Case ensures that even a fall on concrete won’t result in a crack. At 49.90 PLN, it’s a solid rugged case from a Polish brand.

Parameter	Value
Material	Reinforced TPU
Type	Armored
MagSafe	❌
Price	49.90 zł

5. Bizon Case Salpa — the cheapest protection (25 zł)

Lowest price

Flexible TPU case for 25 zł. Bizon Case Salpa is a minimalist, transparent cover that protects against scratches and light drops. It lacks Air Cushion and MagSafe, but it does what it needs to do — at a minimal price.

• Flexible TPU — easy to put on and take off
• Transparent — visible design of the Pixel 10a
• Raised edges around the screen
• Slim profile — adds no unnecessary thickness

Perfect as a temporary case right after purchasing a phone or for those who do not need advanced protection. For 25 PLN, it’s hard to find a better option to start with.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU
Type	Transparent, flexible
MagSafe	❌
Price	25 PLN

Comparison of cases for Pixel 10a

Case	Brand	Type	MagSafe	Feature	Price
Ultra Hybrid	Spigen	Transparent	❌	Air Cushion, top brand	59 PLN
Fusion Magnetic	Ringke	Transparent	✅	MagSafe + yellowing resistance	65 PLN
Flexair Hybrid	Tech-Protect	Transparent	✅	Cheapest MagSafe	35 PLN
Armor Case	3MK	Armored	❌	Reinforced corners	49.90 PLN
Salpa	Bizon	Flexible	❌	Lowest price	25 PLN

Our choice: Depends on the priority. MagSafe for pennies? Tech-Protect Flexair (35 zł). Proven brand? Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 zł). Minimum expenses? Bizon Salpa (25 zł).

Tempered glass for Pixel 10a

Pixel 10a has Gorilla Glass 7i on the front — it’s durable glass, but it’s not indestructible when dropped on concrete. Tempered glass adds a protective layer for a few dozen złoty.

Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ 2-pack (25 zł) — two glasses in a set for the price of one from the competition. Compatible with Pixel 9a and 10a (same screen size). The black frame conceals the edges and gives an elegant look. Best value in this category.

Ringke Tempered Glass 2-pack (39 zł) — premium option with an oleophobic coating (resistant to fingerprints) and a hardness of 9H. Two glasses in the set — one for now, the other as a spare.

3MK FlexibleGlass (34,90 zł) — hybrid glass that combines the flexibility of a film with the hardness of glass. It does not crack upon falling like traditional tempered glass. One piece in the package.

Ładowarki i powerbanki do Pixel 10a

Pixel 10a obsługuje ładowanie 30W po kablu (USB PD 3.0) i 10W bezprzewodowo (Qi). Żeby wykorzystać pełną prędkość ładowania, potrzebujesz ładowarki z USB PD o mocy minimum 30W.

Ładowarka sieciowa — szukaj modeli z USB-C PD 30W+. Ładowarka GaN (azotek galu) będzie kompaktowa i wydajna. Sprawdź ładowarki sieciowe w homescreen.pl.

Powerbank — minimum 10 000 mAh z USB-C PD. Jeśli kupiłeś etui z MagSafe (np. Ringke czy Tech-Protect), magnetyczny powerbank przyklei się do telefonu i naładuje go bezprzewodowo. Powerbanki w homescreen.pl.

USB-C cable — The Pixel 10a has USB-C 3.2, so you need a USB-C to USB-C cable that supports PD 30W+. Most cables in the box are 2.0 versions — a 3.2 cable will be useful for data transfer.

FAQ — most common questions about Pixel 10a accessories

Does the Pixel 10a support MagSafe?
Not natively. The Pixel 10a has Qi standard (10W), but not MagSafe or Qi2. Cases with a built-in magnetic ring (e.g., Ringke Fusion Magnetic, Tech-Protect Flexair MagSafe) add compatibility with MagSafe accessories.

Do cases from the Pixel 9a fit the Pixel 10a?
No. The Pixel 10a has different dimensions (153.9 x 73 x 9 mm) than the Pixel 9a. Cases are not interchangeable between models. Tempered glasses may be compatible — e.g., Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ is labeled as “Pixel 9a / 10a».

What charger for the Pixel 10a?
A USB-C charger with PD (Power Delivery) of at least 30W. This provides full charging speed — 50% battery in 30 minutes.

Is the Pixel 10a waterproof?
Yes, it has an IP68 rating — dustproof and waterproof up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. A case is not required for waterproofing, but it protects against scratches and drops.

Does the Pixel 10a have a glass back?
No. The Pixel 10a has a plastic back — this is one of the reasons why a case is particularly important. Plastic scratches more easily than glass and does not look as good after a few months without protection.

How much do accessories for the Pixel 10a cost?
Cases from 25 PLN (Bizon Salpa) to 65 PLN (Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe). Tempered glasses from 25 PLN (Tech-Protect 2-pack) to 39 PLN (Ringke 2-pack). A complete protection set (case + glass) can be purchased for 50–100 PLN.

Summary

Pixel 10a is a great smartphone, but the plastic back needs protection. The good news is that accessories are cheap — you can buy a complete set (case + tempered glass) for just 50 PLN.

Key takeaways:

• Best quality: Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN) — Air Cushion, transparent, trusted brand
• Best with MagSafe: Ringke Fusion Magnetic (65 PLN) — magnetic ring + transparent
• Best price-to-value ratio: Tech-Protect Flexair MagSafe (35 PLN) — MagSafe for half the price of Ringke
• Rugged: 3MK Armor Case (49.90 PLN) — reinforced corners, Polish brand
• Cheapest: Bizon Case Salpa (25 PLN) — minimum for minimum

Don’t forget about tempered glass — Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ for 25 PLN (2 pieces!) is an absolute must-have.

If you care about the Apple ecosystem, stability, and great video — the better choice will be the iPhone 17 Pro Max.

On the other hand, if you prioritize maximum specifications, a 200 MP camera, S Pen, and greater control over the system — the Galaxy S26 Ultra offers more technology.

6,299 PLN for the iPhone 17 Pro Max. 6,499 PLN for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. The difference? 200 PLN and two completely different ecosystems. On paper, both phones have 6.9-inch screens, flagship processors, and cameras that make DSLRs from a few years ago look pale in comparison. But the devil is in the details.

If you are wondering which of them will be your companion for the next 3-4 years, this article will help you make an informed decision.

📊 Specifications – iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Before we get into the details, here is a comparison of key parameters side by side:

Parametr	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Wyświetlacz	6.9″ OLED, 2868×1320, 460 ppi	6.9″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 498 ppi
Jasność	1000/1600/3000 nitów	~1750/2600 nitów
Procesor	Apple A19 Pro	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
RAM	12 GB (nieoficjalnie)	12/16 GB
Pamięć	256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB / 2 TB	256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB
Aparat główny	48 MP f/1.78	200 MP f/1.4
Ultraszeroki	48 MP f/2.2 (120°)	50 MP f/1.9
Teleobiektyw	48 MP 4x f/2.8 (8x optyczny)	50 MP 5x + 10 MP 3x
Selfie	18 MP f/1.9	12 MP f/2.2
Wideo	4K Dolby Vision 120fps, ProRes	8K 30fps, 4K 120fps
Bateria	4 823 mAh	5 000 mAh
Ładowanie	40 W przewodowe, 25 W MagSafe	60 W przewodowe, 25 W Qi2.2
Wymiary	163.4 x 78.0 x 8.75 mm	163.6 x 78.1 x 7.90 mm
Waga	233 g	214 g
Ochrona	Ceramic Shield 2, IP68 (6 m)	Gorilla Armor, IP68
Materiał	Aluminium, Ceramic Shield	Tytan
System	iOS 26	Android 16 + One UI
S Pen / rysik	❌	✅
Cena (256 GB)	6 299 zł	6 499 zł

At first glance, it is clear: these are two different approaches to flagship devices. Samsung focuses on camera resolution and faster charging, while Apple emphasizes the video ecosystem and memory capacity. Let’s get into the details.

⚡ Performance and Processor

A19 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

The iPhone 17 Pro Max is powered by Apple A19 Pro — a chip manufactured using a 2 nm process with a 6-core CPU and a 6-core GPU featuring hardware ray tracing. Samsung counters with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 from Qualcomm, which Samsung uses in all regions (no more Exynos in Europe).

Benchmarks vs Reality

In Geekbench 6 tests, Samsung surprised: Galaxy S26 Ultra scored 11,738 points in multi-core — about 20% more than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (~9,700 points). Single-core? Samsung also leads with a score of 3,852 points.

Does this mean that Samsung is faster in everyday use? Not necessarily. iOS traditionally optimizes resources better, so an iPhone with less RAM (12 GB vs 16 GB in the top version of Samsung) can run just as smoothly. The differences in benchmarks mainly translate to:

• Video and 3D graphics rendering — here Samsung has a measurable advantage
• Multitasking with multiple heavy applications — 16 GB of RAM gives Samsung a buffer
• Daily applications (social media, browser, maps) — both phones operate at the same speed

💡 Tip: If you’re not rendering video on your phone and not playing the latest 3D games, you simply won’t notice any performance differences between these two flagships.

---

Display – iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Resolution, brightness, and screen features

The iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra offer large, 6.9-inch OLED displays with a refresh rate of 120 Hz. However, this is where the similarities between the screens of both flagships essentially end.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a higher screen resolution — 3120 × 1440 px (498 ppi), while iPhone 17 Pro Max offers 2868 × 1320 px (460 ppi). In practice, you will notice the difference in sharpness mainly when viewing text or images very closely. In everyday use, both displays are simply phenomenally sharp.

Where does iPhone 17 Pro Max catch up? Screen brightness. Apple claims even up to 3000 nits at peak (e.g., in full sunlight) — this is one of the highest values on the smartphone market. Galaxy S26 Ultra reaches around 2600 nits, so in very bright conditions, the iPhone may be slightly more readable.

Samsung has something that we won’t find in the iPhone — the Privacy Display feature. This technology limits the screen viewing angle, so people sitting next to you on the bus or train won’t see your messages or banking app. In terms of privacy, this is a very practical solution.

Feature	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Resolution	2868×1320 (460 ppi)	3120×1440 (498 ppi)
Peak Brightness	3,000 nits	~2,600 nits
Privacy Display	❌	✅
Glass	Ceramic Shield 2	Gorilla Armor
Always-On Display	✅	✅

💡With such large and bright screens, it’s worth considering their protection — tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max and tempered glass for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra can be found at the homescreen.pl store

---

📸 Camera and Photography

This is where the most interesting part of the comparison begins. Both phones have camera systems that compete with compact cameras, but they approach photography from different angles.

Main Camera: 48 MP vs 200 MP

Samsung boasts a 200 MP with an aperture of f/1.4 — the brightest aperture in Galaxy history. It lets in 47% more light than the S25 Ultra (f/1.7). The iPhone responds with «modest» 48 MP, but with optical sensor-shift stabilization.

Is 200 MP better than 48 MP? By default, both phones take pictures at ~12 MP (through pixel binning). Samsung wins in situations where you want to pull out detail — the full 200 MP provides huge files for cropping. The iPhone focuses on color consistency across all three lenses.

Zoom: periscope system

Zoom	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Ultrawide	48 MP, 0.5x	50 MP, 0.6x
Main	48 MP, 1x-2x	200 MP, 1x
Telephoto #1	—	10 MP, 3x
Telephoto #2	48 MP, 4x (8x optical)	50 MP, 5x
Max digital zoom	40x	100x (Space Zoom AI)

Samsung offers two telephoto lenses (3x and 5x), providing greater flexibility. The iPhone has one 4x telephoto lens, but with the ability to crop to 8x without losing quality (thanks to the 48 MP sensor). In practice, both systems deliver excellent results up to ~10x zoom. Above that, Samsung leads with its 100x Space Zoom supported by AI.

Selfie and portrait mode

The iPhone wins in selfies — 18 MP with autofocus and Center Stage vs 12 MP on Samsung. Center Stage automatically frames the shot, tracking your face during video calls. Samsung has HDR10+ in selfies, but at a lower resolution.

🎬 Video and filming

This is a category where the iPhone traditionally dominates — and the 17 Pro Max maintains this position.

iPhone 17 Pro Max records 4K Dolby Vision up to 120 fps and supports ProRes — a format used in professional post-production. Slow-motion in 4K at 120 fps is a quality that just 3 years ago required a camera costing several thousand zlotys. Additionally, Spatial Video for Apple Vision Pro.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra nagrywa 8K przy 30 fps — wyższa rozdzielczość na papierze, ale 30 fps ogranicza płynność. W 4K Samsung oferuje do 120 fps, co wyrównuje szanse. Brakuje jednak odpowiednika ProRes — pliki Samsunga są kompresowane.

Cecha	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Maks. rozdzielczość	4K 120 fps (Dolby Vision)	8K 30 fps
ProRes / format pro	✅ ProRes 4K 120 fps	❌
Slow-motion	4K 120fps, 1080p 240fps	4K 120fps, 1080p 240fps
Spatial Video	✅	❌
Stabilizacja	Sensor-shift OIS	OIS

Werdykt: Jeśli filmowanie jest dla Ciebie priorytetem, iPhone nie ma konkurencji w segmencie smartfonów. Jeśli nagrywasz głównie krótkie klipy do social media, oba telefony spisują się doskonale.

---

🔋 Bateria i ładowanie

Pojemność baterii i szybkość ładowania

Samsung has a larger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,823 mAh), but the iPhone compensates with better energy optimization. Apple claims 39 hours of video playback for the Pro Max — one of the best results on the market.

Where does Samsung clearly win? Wired charging.

Charging	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Wired	40 W (50% in 20 min)	60 W (75% in 30 min)
Wireless	25 W (MagSafe/Qi2)	25 W (Qi2.2)
Reverse charging	✅ (MagSafe)	✅ (4.5 W)

Samsung charges significantly faster wired — 60 W vs 40 W. If you forgot to charge your phone overnight, Samsung will return to 75% in half an hour. The iPhone takes longer, although 50% in 20 minutes is still a decent result.

Wireless charging is a tie — 25 W on both sides. Both support reverse charging (charging headphones or a watch from the phone).

---

🤖 AI and Software

This is a category that becomes one of the most important differentiators in 2026. Both phones offer advanced AI features, but in different styles.

Apple Intelligence

Apple Intelligence działa głęboko w systemie iOS 26. Kluczowe funkcje:

• Siri z kontekstem — rozumie co jest na ekranie, kontynuuje rozmowę, wykonuje złożone polecenia
• Narzędzia pisania — podsumowywanie, korekta tonu, przepisywanie tekstu w każdej aplikacji
• Genmoji — generowanie spersonalizowanych emoji z opisu
• Image Playground — tworzenie obrazów AI w stylu ilustracji
• Priorytetyzacja powiadomień — AI sortuje powiadomienia według ważności

Galaxy AI

Samsung Galaxy AI w S26 Ultra oferuje:

• Tłumaczenie rozmów w czasie rzeczywistym — podczas połączeń telefonicznych, bez internetu
• Circle to Search — zakreśl cokolwiek na ekranie, żeby to wyszukać
• Generative Edit — filling in photo fragments with AI-generated content
• Note Assist — note summaries, transcription of recordings
• Privacy Display AI — intelligent dimming of the screen when someone is looking from the side

Updates — how many years of support?

Here is the key difference. Apple traditionally supports iPhones for 6-7 years of iOS updates. Samsung promises 7 years of system and security updates starting from the S24 series — matching Apple.

In practice, both phones purchased today will receive updates until 2032-2033. This means that an investment of ~6,300 PLN spreads over at least 7 years of support.

💰 Price and value for money

How much does the iPhone 17 Pro Max cost vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

Variant	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
256 GB	6 299 zł	6 499 zł
512 GB	7 299 zł	7 499 zł
1 TB	8 299 zł	9 499 zł
2 TB	10 299 zł	❌ brak

iPhone 17 Pro Max is about 200 zł cheaper than the Galaxy S26 Ultra in every memory variant. In practice, this means that regardless of the chosen version — 256 GB, 512 GB, or 1 TB — Apple’s smartphone remains slightly more affordable.

Additionally, Apple is the only one offering a variant with as much as 2 TB of memory, which we won’t find in the Galaxy S26 Ultra. This may be significant especially for those recording a lot of high-quality video or photographers working with ProRAW and ProRes files, which can take up a lot of space.

💡 Tip: If 256 GB turns out to be too little, and 1 TB too much, the best compromise for most users will be the 512 GB variant. In both models, it costs around 7 300–7 500 zł and offers enough space for photos, videos, and applications for several years of use.

---

iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra – summary

Which flagship will be the better choice?

After analyzing 8 categories, there is no clear winner. Both phones are phenomenal, but they target different users.

If you are planning to purchase one of these flagships, it’s worth thinking about protection right away — a good case for iPhone 17 Pro Max or case for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra will help secure the phone from the very first day of use.

iPhone 17 Pro Max — for whom?

• Filmmakers and video creators — ProRes, Dolby Vision 4K 120fps, Spatial Video
• Users of the Apple ecosystem — Mac, iPad, AirPods, Apple Watch, Vision Pro
• People valuing long-term value — iPhones hold their value longer in the secondary market
• Photographers needing large storage — 2 TB option
• People preferring simplicity — iOS is less customizable but more consistent

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — for whom?

• S Pen users — notes, drawing, precise control
• Photographers focusing on zoom — 100x Space Zoom, two telephoto lenses
• People who value fast charging — 60 W wired
• Multitaskers — DeX, split windows, 16 GB RAM
• People who value screen privacy — Privacy Display is a unique feature

If you already have an iPhone or Samsung…

Changing ecosystems is not just about a new phone — it’s a change of watch, headphones, subscriptions, and habits. If you’ve been in the Apple or Samsung ecosystem for years, switching to the other side is rarely worthwhile. Choose a newer model in your ecosystem.

Are you buying your first flagship? Check out both in the store. Hold them in your hand. See which interface is more intuitive for you. For around ~6,300-6,500 PLN, you can’t go wrong with either of them.

Regardless of whether you choose an iPhone or Samsung, it’s worth taking care of the right accessories right away — especially screen protection, a case, and a good charger. If you’re looking for proven models, check out our rankings and guides:

– Best tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max →
– Top 10 cases for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra →
– What charger for iPhone 17? →
– Best charger for Samsung Galaxy S25 →

FAQ – frequently asked questions

How much does the iPhone 17 Pro Max cost in Poland?
The iPhone 17 Pro Max starts at 6,299 PLN for the 256 GB version. The 512 GB variant costs 7,299 PLN, 1 TB — 8,299 PLN, and 2 TB — 10,299 PLN.

When is the release of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was released in the first quarter of 2026. The phone has been available in Polish stores since February 2026.

Which has a better camera — iPhone 17 Pro Max or Galaxy S26 Ultra?
It depends on the use case. Samsung excels in photography with high zoom (100x Space Zoom) and has a brighter main lens (f/1.4). The iPhone has better color consistency between lenses and dominates in video recording (ProRes, Dolby Vision 4K 120fps).

Which has longer update support?
Both offer 7 years of system and security updates. The iPhone 17 Pro Max will be supported until ~2032, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra — until ~2033.

Is it worth waiting for the S26 Ultra, or should you buy the S25 Ultra cheaper?
The S26 Ultra offers several significant upgrades: a brighter f/1.4 lens (vs f/1.7), Privacy Display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and next-generation Galaxy AI. If you find the S25 Ultra at a good price (below 5,000 PLN), it’s still an excellent phone. But if you’re buying for the next 3-4 years — the S26 Ultra is a better investment.

iPhone 17 Pro Max or Galaxy S26 Ultra — which is lighter?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra weighs 214 g — 19 g less than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 g). Samsung is also slimmer: 7.9 mm vs 8.75 mm.