Category: Uncategorized

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Watch Ultra 3 – comparison, differences, and cost-effectiveness

Apple Watch Ultra 3 is an evolution, not a revolution compared to Ultra 2 – both watches look almost identical, but Ultra 3 has a larger screen, longer battery life, satellite connectivity, and a 5G RedCap modem. For most users, Ultra 2 will still be a great choice, but if you are just buying a premium smartwatch or need maximum independence in the field – Ultra 3 is the best choice for 2025.

Comparison table: Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Ultra 3

Feature	Apple Watch Ultra 2 (2023)	Apple Watch Ultra 3 (2025)
Starting price (PL)	currently approx. 3399 PLN	3799 PLN (launch price)
Case material	Grade 5 Titanium (natural or black)	Grade 5 Titanium (natural or black)
Dimensions	49 × 44 × 14.4 mm	49 × 44 × 12 mm
Weight (without strap)	61.4–61.8 g	61.6–61.8 g
Display	1.92″ LTPO OLED (410 × 502 px, 326 ppi) – 3000 nits	1.99″ LTPO3 OLED (422 × 514 px, 326 ppi) – 3000 nits
Processor (SiP)	Apple S9 + Neural Engine	Apple S10 + Neural Engine
Internal memory	64 GB	64 GB
Cellular connectivity	4G/LTE (eSIM)	5G RedCap + 4G/LTE (eSIM)
Satellite connectivity	❌ No	✅ Emergency SOS via Satellite
Local connectivity	Wi-Fi 4 (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, UWB 2nd gen., GPS L1+L5	Same
Battery – typical use	Up to 36 h	Up to 42 h
Battery – Low Power Mode	Up to 72 h	Up to 72 h
Durability	WR100, IP6X, MIL-STD-810H	WR100, IP6X, MIL-STD-810H
Health sensors	Heart rate, ECG, SpO₂, temp., accelerometer, gyroscope	The same + hypertension notifications, Sleep Score
Sports features	Multi-sport, Backtrack, compass, GPS L1+L5	The same + Workout Buddy (AI coach)
Operating system	watchOS 10 → update to watchOS 26	watchOS 26 (factory)
Update support	until 2028	until 2030

What does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 look like and how does it differ from the Ultra 2?

Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 have a new design?

On the outside, Apple Watch Ultra 3 looks almost identical to Ultra 2, but the devil is in the details. Apple has retained the distinctive aircraft-grade titanium case (Grade 5) in a size of 49 mm, however, the new model has thinner screen bezels by 24%. This allows the Ultra 3 to offer a larger working area (1.99 ″ vs 1.92 ″) without increasing the overall dimensions.

Interestingly, the case of the Ultra 3 is also thinner (12 mm instead of 14.4 mm), which makes the watch sit better on the wrist.
The weight remains almost identical – about 61–62 g without the strap, so there is no noticeable difference in weight during daily use.

What materials are used in the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Both watches – Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 – utilize the same, exceptionally durable titanium and sapphire glass that is scratch-resistant.
The construction meets the standards of IP6X, WR100 (up to 100 m immersion) and MIL-STD-810H, which is the military standard for resistance to shocks, dust, moisture, and extreme temperatures.

In practice, this means that both Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 are ready for mountain trekking, swimming, and even diving up to 40 m – ideal for outdoor athletes.

What colors are available for the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Apple continues with two color variants:

Natural titanium (silver)
Black titanium

These are minimalist, elegant shades that pair well with any strap – from silicone sports to leather and fabric.
👉 See straps for Apple Watch Ultra 3 at Home Screen store

Display, performance, and battery – what has been improved in the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Is the display in Ultra 3 better?

Yes. The Ultra 3 has a newer LTPO OLED 3rd generation panel, which provides better viewing angles, deeper blacks, and greater energy efficiency.
Although the brightness remains the same (3000 nits), in practice, the Ultra 3 is more readable in sunlight and has a smoother always-on mode with a 1 Hz refresh rate – for the first time on the Apple Watch, you can constantly see the second hand.

The resolution has increased from 410×502 px to 422×514 px, which is not revolutionary but improves the sharpness of dials and the readability of maps in workout mode.

Does the new S10 processor make a difference?

The Apple Watch Ultra 3 is powered by a S10 SiP chip, which replaced the S9 from Ultra 2.
The differences in speed are minimal, but S10 is more energy-efficient, which combined with the new display gives a real +6 hours of battery.
The new chip also enables the “wrist flick” gesture (waving the wrist for control) and better processing of AI features with watchOS 26.

How long does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 last on battery?

Apple declares:

Ultra 2: up to 36 hours of normal usage
Ultra 3: up to 42 hours (normally) or 72 hours in power-saving mode

Tests confirm that the Ultra 3 actually lasts up to 2–3 days with typical usage (with Always-On Display).
Fast USB-C charging in 15 minutes adds about 12 hours of usage.

👉 Check fast chargers for Apple Watch Ultra 3

Connectivity and new features

5G, satellite, and greater independence

The Apple Watch Ultra 3 is the first Apple smartwatch with support for 5G RedCap networks and satellite SOS connectivity.
This allows the watch to connect to the network even in areas without GSM coverage.
The Emergency SOS via Satellite feature allows you to send an emergency message and GPS coordinates to rescue services or emergency contacts — it works similarly to the iPhone 14 and 15.
This solution is primarily aimed at people who engage in trekking, sailing, or off-roading, where lack of coverage is a real problem.

The new 5G RedCap modem improves coverage and energy efficiency, not offering the full 5G speed known from smartphones, but sufficient for maps, notifications, or Siri.
In Poland, the 5G Standalone feature is already being implemented by operators, so Ultra 3 will be fully compatible in the coming months.

Additional connectivity enhancements

improved antenna layout (better coverage in difficult terrain),
UWB 2nd gen. – precise device locating in the “Find” app,
dual GPS L1+L5 – accurate route tracking even in mountains and cities,
Bluetooth 5.3 and Wi-Fi 4 (2.4 / 5 GHz) with lower power consumption.

These enhancements make Ultra 3 the most “independent” Apple smartwatch to date – it operates independently from the iPhone, even in the field.

Health and sports features

Both generations of Apple Watch Ultra offer a wide range of health sensors, however, Ultra 3 expands their capabilities through software.
The watch monitors heart rate (optical 3rd gen), ECG, blood oxygen (SpO₂), body temperature, and detects falls and accidents (Crash Detection).

The new features in Ultra 3 are:

notifications for hypertension,
Sleep Score – daily sleep quality assessment,
Workout Buddy – an intelligent AI coach from Apple Intelligence, analyzing progress and motivating during workouts.

In terms of sports, both models offer:

measurement of running power, stride length, and ground contact,
precise GPS L1+L5 and barometric altimeter,
Multi-sport mode (triathlon, cycling, swimming, climbing),
86 dB emergency siren and Backtrack mode (return navigation).

The watches are waterproof up to 100 m, resistant to saltwater and dust, and thanks to the EN13319 certification, they can serve as a dive computer.

Software and Support

How long will Apple update these watches?

Apple is known for its long support of its devices, and the Ultra series is no exception.
Apple Watch Ultra 2 debuted with watchOS 10, and after updates, it now runs on watchOS 26, while Ultra 3 comes factory-installed with this version.

How long will support last?

Ultra 2 – security and system updates expected until around 2028,
Ultra 3 – full support until 2030.

This means that by purchasing the Ultra 3, you gain two more years of updates, which translates to a longer device lifespan and access to new Apple Intelligence (AI) features that may require the newer S10 chip in the future.

Compatibility and Ecosystem

Both models work with iPhone 11 or newer (running iOS 26).
Thanks to integration with the Apple ecosystem, users can take advantage of:

Apple Fitness+ (workouts with trainers),
Apple Pay (contactless payments),
Apple Music and Podcasts,
health data synchronization in iCloud.

Ultra 3 and Ultra 2 also have full accessory compatibility – 49 mm bands and chargers are interchangeable between generations.

Is it worth buying the Apple Watch Ultra 3 instead of Ultra 2?

For most users, the differences between Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 are not revolutionary, but they are real.
The new model is more efficient, lasts longer on battery, supports 5G and satellite communication, and has longer support.

When is it better to choose Ultra 3?

if you don’t have an Ultra series watch yet,
if you often stay out of network coverage (mountains, sailing, travel),
if you want the most future-proof model with 5G and SOS via Satellite,
if you care about an AI trainer and longer battery life.

When is it better to buy the Ultra 2?

when you have a limited budget – the price difference is often 400–600 PLN,
if you mainly use the watch in the city and do not need satellite connectivity,
if you already have the Ultra 2 – switching does not make much economic sense.

In terms of cost-effectiveness, a simple rule can be applied:

🔹 New users → choose Ultra 3
🔹 Ultra 2 owners → stick with your current model

📊 Summary: Apple Watch Ultra 3 vs Ultra 2

Aspect	Better Choice	Comment
Design and Build Quality	Draw	Both models are titanium, same sturdiness
Display	Ultra 3	Thinner bezels, newer LTPO3 panel
Battery	Ultra 3	+6 hours with typical usage
Connectivity	Ultra 3	5G RedCap + SOS via Satellite
Health Features	Ultra 3	New algorithms: hypertension, Sleep Score
Sports Features	Draw	Workout Buddy (AI) only in Ultra 3
Price	Ultra 2	Usually cheaper by 400–600 PLN
System Support	Ultra 3	Until 2030 (vs 2028)

💬 User Opinions and Reviews

Reviewers (The Verge, Tom’s Guide, MacRumors) unanimously emphasize that Ultra 3 is a great smartwatch, but more of an improvement than a revolution.
New features are mainly valuable for those who need them in practice (outdoor, safety, sports).

“Ultra 3 is for those who do not yet have Ultra — for Ultra 2 owners, it’s more of a luxury than a necessity.” — The Verge

Users praise primarily the longer battery life, larger screen, and the sturdiness of the construction.
The most common conclusion: if this is your first Ultra – go for the “three”; if you have the “two” – wait for the Ultra 4.

FAQ – frequently asked questions about Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2

⭐️ Is it worth buying the Apple Watch Ultra 3 in 2025?
Yes, if you are just buying your first Apple Watch Ultra. The Ultra 3 model has a larger screen, longer battery life, satellite connectivity, and 5G support, making it the most future-proof choice. For Ultra 2 owners, the change is not necessary, as the differences are not revolutionary.

⭐️ What is the difference between the Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2?
The Ultra 3 has a larger screen (1.99″ vs 1.92″), thinner bezels, a newer S10 processor, 5G RedCap connectivity, SOS via Satellite feature, and longer software support until 2030. The other elements – such as health sensors or durability – are practically identical.

⭐️ How long does the battery last in the Apple Watch Ultra 3?
The watch lasts up to 42 hours with normal use and up to 72 hours in power-saving mode. Thanks to fast charging, just 15 minutes is enough to gain about 12 hours of use.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 work in Poland with 5G network?
Yes, it uses the 5G RedCap mode, which operates in Standalone (SA) 5G networks. Polish operators – including Plus, Orange, and T-Mobile – are gradually implementing this solution, so compatibility will expand.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 support SOS via satellite in Poland?
Yes, Apple has announced the availability of the Emergency SOS via Satellite feature for users in Poland and the entire EU. The service is free for the first 2 years after activating the watch.

⭐️ Do the bands and cases from Apple Watch Ultra 2 fit Ultra 3?
Yes. All accessories for the 49 mm case are fully compatible. Therefore, you can use existing bands, cases, and chargers with the new model.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 have new health features?
Ultra 3 introduces hypertension notifications and the Sleep Score feature – a sleep quality assessment. Both models measure heart rate, ECG, SpO₂, and detect falls or accidents (Crash Detection).

⭐️ Is the Apple Watch Ultra 3 suitable for diving?
Yes. The watch is water-resistant up to 100 meters and meets the EN13319 standard, allowing it to be used as a dive computer up to 40 m deep. It also works in saltwater and extreme temperatures.

⭐️ What are the prices of Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2 in Poland?
Ultra 3 costs about 3799 PLN (launch), while Ultra 2 is available from about 3399 PLN. The difference of about 400–600 PLN depends on the store and promotions. If Ultra 2 is significantly cheaper, it will still be a very good choice.

⭐️ Does Apple Watch Ultra 3 work without an iPhone?
Yes. Thanks to the eSIM module and cellular connectivity (LTE/5G), Ultra 3 can operate independently – receiving calls, messages, and GPS data without a phone nearby.

⭐️ Does Ultra 3 support Apple Pay and Siri in Polish?
Yes, the watch fully supports Apple Pay and Siri in Polish, both online and offline (thanks to on-device processing).

⭐️ Does Apple Watch Ultra 3 have a better screen than Ultra 2?
Yes. Although the brightness remains at 3000 nits, Ultra 3 features a newer 3rd generation LTPO OLED display, with thinner bezels and better viewing angles.

2026-03-15

iPad Pro M5 vs M4 – which one is worth buying in 2025?

The latest iPad Pro with the M5 chip is an evolutionary upgrade over its predecessor, the M4. It offers higher performance (especially in graphics and AI), faster connectivity (Wi‑Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, faster 5G), and support for fast charging. The iPad Pro M5 will be the best choice for professionals and the most demanding users, while the iPad Pro M4 will still perform excellently for those with slightly lower requirements – and at a lower price.

📊iPad Pro M5 vs iPad Pro M4 – Comparison Table

Feature	iPad Pro M4 11″	iPad Pro M4 12.9″	iPad Pro M5 11″	iPad Pro M5 13″
Display	11″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR, 120 Hz, HDR	12.9″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR	11″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR	13″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR
Processor	Apple M4	Apple M4	Apple M5	Apple M5
RAM	8–16 GB	8–16 GB	12–16 GB	12–16 GB
Storage	256 GB – 2 TB SSD	256 GB – 2 TB SSD	256 GB – 2 TB (faster SSD)	256 GB – 2 TB (faster SSD)
Cameras	12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR	12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR	unchanged	unchanged
Connectivity	Wi-Fi 6E, BT 5.3	Wi-Fi 6E, BT 5.3	Wi-Fi 7, BT 6, 5G C1X	Wi-Fi 7, BT 6, 5G C1X
Charging	approx. 20–30 W	approx. 20–30 W	Fast Charge (50% in 30 min)	Fast Charge (50% in 30 min)
System	iPadOS 17	iPadOS 17	iPadOS 26	iPadOS 26
Starting Price	from 999 USD	from 1299 USD	from 999 USD	from 1299 USD

At first glance: iPad Pro M5 and M4 are very similar in terms of base specifications – both come in the same sizes and have fantastic OLED displays, identical cameras, and casings. The biggest differences lie in performance and internal components: the M5 chip offers higher performance than the M4, M5 models have more RAM in cheaper configurations, as well as newer connectivity modules (Wi‑Fi 7, 5G C1X modem) and fast charging capability.

Screen and design – does the iPad Pro M5 have a better display than the M4?

The same Ultra Retina XDR OLED display

Both the iPad Pro M4 and M5 have the same top-tier Ultra Retina XDR OLED screen with ProMotion 120 Hz technology and full HDR support (1600 nit peak). It’s the same tandem OLED panel that Apple introduced in 2024 and still has no competition in the tablet world.

The image quality is phenomenal: perfect blacks, high contrast, and a wide P3 color gamut. Both models provide smooth scrolling and responsiveness that no other tablet offers. In practice, you won’t notice a difference between the M4 and M5 screens – Apple didn’t need to change it, as they had already achieved a “reference” level.

Design – thin, light, and sturdy

Both generations of the iPad Pro have the same aerospace aluminum construction, with flat edges and very thin bezels.
The dimensions and weight remain identical:

iPad Pro 11″ – 5.3 mm thick, approx. 470 g
iPad Pro 13″ – 5.1 mm thick, approx. 570 g

These are still the thinnest tablets on the market. A new feature of the iPad Pro M5 is the Space Black color, which has replaced the previous star gray. For many users, this is a minor but desirable aesthetic change.

💡 Check also cases for iPad Pro 13″ or cases for iPad Pro 11″, to properly protect this ultra-thin design from scratches.

Front camera – now in a better position

The most practical change concerns the position of the front camera. In the iPad Pro M5, it has been moved to the longer edge, allowing you to look directly into the lens during landscape mode calls.
In the M4, the camera was on the shorter side, so in horizontal orientation, it gave the impression of a “side glance.” If you often hold online meetings or video lessons – this improvement really makes a difference.

Performance and computing power – Apple M5 vs M4

How big is the performance difference between M4 and M5?

The Apple M5 chip is an improved version of the M4 chip, made using the same 3 nm process, but with a new core architecture.

CPU: up to 15% faster, with better energy management,
GPU: up to 40% more powerful, with support for 3rd generation ray tracing,
Neural Engine: up to 4× faster in AI tasks.

In everyday use (notes, browsing the web, movies), the differences are minimal. But if you work with RAW files, design in Procreate, edit 4K videos in LumaFusion, or use AI applications – M5 provides a real boost in work comfort.

More RAM in cheaper models

This is a significant change.

iPad Pro M4 (256/512 GB) → 8 GB RAM
iPad Pro M5 (256/512 GB) → 12 GB RAM

For demanding applications, this is a big difference – M5 handles multitasking better and keeps more projects open without refreshing. The 1 TB and 2 TB versions in both models have 16 GB RAM.

Faster disk and memory

The M5 uses newer NVMe SSD modules, offering up to 2× faster data read and write speeds. The memory bandwidth has also been increased to 153 GB/s (up from 120 GB/s in the M4).
The result: shorter application loading times, faster transfer of large files, and smoother performance in professional applications.

Battery and charging – does the iPad Pro M5 last longer?

Battery life

Apple claims the same operating time: up to 10 hours of Wi-Fi or 9 hours on 5G.
In practice, the iPad Pro M5 has slightly better energy efficiency – thanks to the newer processor and modem, it consumes less power under heavy load (e.g., during 4K streaming or working on 5G).

Fast charging – finally!

The biggest novelty is fast charge.
The iPad Pro M5 can be charged up to 50% in about 30 minutes using a 40W or stronger power adapter (e.g., a MacBook charger).
The M4 model did not support fast charging and needed over an hour for a similar result.
This is a huge advantage if you use the iPad outdoors or want to quickly recharge it between meetings.

🔋 Also see tempered glass for iPad Pro 13″ and glass for iPad Pro 11″, if you want to protect the screen from damage during everyday use or charging in a bag.

Cameras and multimedia – does M5 take better photos?

Rear setup unchanged

Both models have the same configuration:

main camera 12 MP (f/1.8),
ultra-wide 10 MP (123°),
LiDAR scanner for AR and autofocus.

The quality of photos and 4K videos remains the same. Apple has not changed the sensors or optics. These are solid cameras for scans and recordings, but they still do not match the Pro iPhones.

Front camera – practical change

The 12 Mpix module with Center Stage remains the same, but its position (on the longer side in M5) significantly improves the comfort of video conferencing.

Sound and multimedia

The system of four stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos remains unchanged. The sound is still fantastic – full and loud, even without headphones.
Both iPads lack a 3.5 mm Jack socket, but you can use USB-C or Bluetooth headphones.

Connectivity and accessories – what’s new in the iPad Pro M5?

Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6

The new connectivity chip in M5 supports the Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) standard, providing higher speeds and lower latency.
M4 remains with Wi-Fi 6E.
Bluetooth 6 allows simultaneous audio connections and better energy management – these are future-proof features that you will appreciate over time.

5G C1X modem

The iPad Pro M5 received a custom Apple C1X modem instead of a Qualcomm chip. It is even 50% faster and consumes less energy.
If you often work in the field, M5 will provide more stable connections and fewer signal “drops.”

Accessory compatibility

Full compatibility in both directions:

Apple Pencil 2 and Apple Pencil Pro work with M4 and M5,
Magic Keyboard (old and new with function key row) fits both models,
the same Smart Connector and magnetic mounts.

No need to buy new accessories when changing iPads – that’s a big plus.

Is it worth paying extra for the iPad Pro M5?

When it’s worth choosing M5

You work with video, 3D graphics, design, or AI.
You often use a 5G modem and care about faster transmission.
You need fast-charge and modern connectivity standards.
You want hardware with longer system support (iPadOS 26+).

When M4 is enough

You use the iPad for notes, movies, games, and daily tasks.
You don’t need the fastest networks or fast charging.
What matters to you is a lower price – M4 offers 90% of the capabilities of M5, often on sale for several hundred zlotys less.

❓ FAQ – Frequently Asked Questions about iPad Pro M5 vs iPad Pro M4

🔹 What is the main difference between iPad Pro M5 and M4?

The iPad Pro M5 has a newer processor Apple M5, faster GPU and AI, more RAM in cheaper models, and supports fast charging. The rest (screen, casing, cameras) remains unchanged.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a better screen?

No. Both iPad Pros have the same Ultra Retina XDR OLED 120 Hz screen, with brightness up to 1600 nits.

🔹 Is it worth paying extra for the iPad Pro M5?

Yes – if you use the iPad for graphics, video, 3D projects, or AI.
No – if you mainly use it for multimedia and notes.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a faster processor?

Yes, the processor Apple M5 is about ~15% faster in CPU and up to 40% faster in GPU than M4.

🔹 How much RAM do the iPad Pro M4 and M5 have?

M4: 8 GB (256/512 GB) or 16 GB (1–2 TB)
M5: 12 GB (256/512 GB) or 16 GB (1–2 TB)

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a longer battery life?

Unofficially – slightly longer under heavy load, but Apple claims the same 10 hours.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 support fast charging?

Yes. It supports fast-charge 50% in 30 minutes (charger ≥ 40 W).

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M4 support fast charging?

No. M4 charges at standard speed (20–30 W), without fast-charge mode.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a better camera?

No. The cameras are identical (12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR), only the position of the front camera differs – in M5 it is on the side.

🔹 Is the camera on the iPad Pro M5 better for video calls?

Yes, because it has been moved to the longer edge – now you look directly into the lens during a call.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have Wi-Fi 7?

Yes, M5 supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6. M4 has Wi-Fi 6E and BT 5.3.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a new 5G modem?

Yes. M5 uses the Apple C1X modem – faster and more energy-efficient than Qualcomm in M4.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 work with Apple Pencil Pro?

Yes. Apple Pencil Pro works with the iPad Pro M5 and M4.

🔹 Do accessories from the iPad Pro M4 fit M5?

Yes – full compatibility. Magic Keyboard, Apple Pencil, and other accessories work on both models.

2026-03-15

Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17 – what’s new?

The series Xiaomi 17 is a significant step forward compared to Xiaomi 15. All models – from the basic to Pro Max – bring the new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, better Leica cameras, larger batteries (up to 7500 mAh) and the newer HyperOS 3.0 system based on Android 16.
Meanwhile, Xiaomi 15 still remains an excellent choice for those looking for top performance at a lower price.

Comparison table Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17

Specification	Xiaomi 15 / 15 Pro / 15 Pro Max	Xiaomi 17 / 17 Pro / 17 Pro Max
Release Date	Q4 2024 (globally)	Q3 2025 (China), globally 2026
System / UI	Android 15, HyperOS 2.0	Android 16, HyperOS 3.0
Display	6.36″ LTPO AMOLED (3200 nit HDR, 120 Hz) – Pro / Pro Max up to 6.7″	6.3″ LTPO AMOLED (3500 nit HDR, 120 Hz) – Pro / Pro Max with rear OLED display (2.7–2.9″)
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm, Oryon V2 up to 4.32 GHz)	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm, Oryon V3 up to 4.6 GHz)
GPU	Adreno 830	Adreno 840
RAM / Storage	12/16 GB LPDDR5x, 256/512 GB UFS 4.0 (1 TB in Pro Max)	12/16 GB LPDDR5x, 256/512 GB UFS 4.1 (1 TB in Pro / Pro Max)
Rear Camera	50 MP (f/1.6, OIS) + 50 MP wide (115°) + 50 MP tele 2.6× (Pro 5×)	50 MP (f/1.7, Leica, OIS) + 50 MP wide (102° or macro 5 cm) + 50 MP tele 2.6× / 5×
Front Camera	32 MP (f/2.0), no AF (Pro with AF)	50 MP (f/2.2, PDAF) with autofocus
Battery	5240–6100 mAh (15–Pro Max), 90 W / 50 W	6300–7500 mAh (17–Pro Max), 120 W / 50 W
Connectivity	5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, Dual SIM + eSIM, USB-C 3.2 DP, IP68	5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, UWB (Pro / Pro Max), USB-C 3.2 DP, IP68
Glass / Other	Dragon Glass 2, ultrasonic reader	Dragon Glass 3, UWB, rear display (Pro / Pro Max)
Price (starting)	from approx. 3779 PLN (12/256 GB, PL 2025)	similar price level in China – PL premiere 2026

**from left, Xiaomi 17, 17 Pro Max, Xiaomi 17 Pro**

Performance of Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17

Which one is faster?

Both smartphones are powered by top Qualcomm processors. Xiaomi 15 uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) chip with Oryon V2 cores (up to 4.32 GHz) and Adreno 830 graphics, while Xiaomi 17 received the newer Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) with Oryon V3 cores (up to 4.6 GHz) and Adreno 840 graphics.

In practice, this translates to a noticeable increase in performance. According to the manufacturer, the unit in Xiaomi 17 is 20–50% faster than in Xiaomi 15. Benchmarks confirm this data – GeekBench shows around 3440 points (single-core) for Xiaomi 17 vs 2769 points for Xiaomi 15, and AnTuTu gives a clear advantage to the new model.

In everyday use

Both smartphones offer 12 or 16 GB of LPDDR5x memory, ensuring smooth operation of the system and games. However, Xiaomi 17 handles multitasking better, loads applications faster, and maintains high performance longer under heavy load. For gamers and demanding users – the choice is obvious.

Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17 Display

Does Xiaomi 17 have a better display than Xiaomi 15?

Xiaomi 15 has an LTPO AMOLED panel with a diagonal of 6.36″, a resolution of 2670 × 1200 px (~460 ppi), and a variable refresh rate from 1 to 120 Hz. The maximum brightness reached 3200 nits.
Xiaomi 17 offers a display also LTPO AMOLED with a diagonal of 6.3″, a resolution of 2656 × 1220 px (~464 ppi) with an adaptive refresh rate of 1-120 Hz, but with a maximum brightness of up to 3500 nits and Dragon Crystal Glass 3 protective glass.

🔎 What does this mean in practice

In strong sunlight conditions, the Xiaomi 17 display will be more readable due to its higher brightness – which translates to better visibility outdoors.
LTPO with a range of 1–120 Hz means that the refresh rate can be dynamically adjusted depending on the content, which helps save battery – both generations have this feature, but the 17 is a more refined solution.
Higher brightness and newer protective glass in the Xiaomi 17 also mean better durability and a lower risk of glare or loss of readability in sunlight.
Although the change in screen size is minimal (6.36″ → 6.3″), the Xiaomi 17 gains in compactness and better aspect ratio while maintaining excellent image quality.

Additional improvements in the Xiaomi 17 series (Pro and Pro Max):

For the Pro and Pro Max variants, there is a secondary display on the back of the case with a diagonal of about 2.7″-2.9″ – which can serve as a preview for the cameras or display notifications.
Higher brightness (3500 nits) is also maintained in Pro/Pro Max, which means that regardless of the version, you get a top-tier panel.

✅ Conclusion

If the priority is a best display — meaning excellent brightness, fast refresh rate adaptation, and better protective glass — then the Xiaomi 17 performs better than the Xiaomi 15. However, if you mainly use your smartphone in normal conditions and do not care about extreme brightness or a Pro/Pro Max rear display — the Xiaomi 15’s screen still meets most needs.

👉 Check out tempered glass for Xiaomi 15

Leica Camera in Xiaomi 15 and 17

Which one takes better photos?

In the camera section, both smartphones are at a very high level, but the Xiaomi 17 introduces several significant improvements compared to the Xiaomi 15.

In the Xiaomi 15: rear set of three 50 MP cameras (main f/1.62 + ultra-wide f/2.2 + tele f/2.0, 2.6× zoom) according to the DXOMARK test.
In the Xiaomi 17: also three 50 MP cameras each, but with the newer Light Fusion 950 sensor (1/1.31″, f/1.67) and ultra-wide 50 MP f/2.4, tele 50 MP 2.6× zoom (and in Pro/Pro Max variants even 5× optical zoom).
Front camera in the Xiaomi 17: 50 MP with PDAF and autofocus — in the Xiaomi 15 it was 32 MP without AF

What does it mean in practice?

Better photo quality in low light: a larger sensor and improved lens in the Xiaomi 17 mean more light, less noise, and better dynamic range (in Pro/Pro Max versions with LOFIC technology for 16.5 EV).
Better zooms: the basic 17 model maintains a 2.6× zoom, but the Pro and Pro Max versions are equipped with a 5× telephoto lens with a larger sensor – providing a real advantage when photographing from a distance.
Higher selfie detail: 50 MP with autofocus in the 17 is definitely an improved front camera compared to 32 MP without AF in the 15.
New features and processing: The 17 series uses newer Leica AI algorithms and better optics — effectively improving colors, contrast, and depth.

✅ Conclusions

If the camera is a priority for you, then the Xiaomi 17 takes photography and video to the next level: better zooms, better sensor, more details.
However, if your needs are standard — photos, videos, social media — the Xiaomi 15 still delivers great results and may be a more cost-effective choice.

🛒 Check out cases for Xiaomi 15 at Home Screen store

Battery and charging – Xiaomi 17 outclasses its predecessor

How long does Xiaomi 17 last?

The biggest advancement between the Xiaomi 15 and 17 series concerns the battery and energy efficiency.

Xiaomi 15 offered a battery capacity of 5240 mAh,
Xiaomi 15 Pro – about 5700 mAh,
Xiaomi 15 Pro Max – about 6100 mAh.

The new generation takes it a step further:

Xiaomi 17 has 7000 mAh,
Xiaomi 17 Pro – 6300 mAh,
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max – up to 7500 mAh, making it one of the most powerful flagships on the market.

The difference is huge – in practice, the 17 series lasts even 40–60% longer on a single charge than the 15 series.
The new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chips, manufactured using a 3 nm process, are more energy-efficient, so even more powerful devices consume less energy.

⚡ Charging speed

Xiaomi 15 / Pro / Pro Max: 90 W wired + 50 W wireless + 22.5 W reverse charging.
Xiaomi 17 / Pro / Pro Max: up to 120 W wired, 50 W wireless, 22.5 W reverse.

This means that even the huge 7500 mAh battery in the Pro Max model can be fully charged in about 25 minutes, while the smaller Xiaomi 17 can recharge in under 20 minutes.

In practice:

10 minutes of charging is about 50 % energy,
30 minutes – full charge,
and the 50 W wireless works stably even with Qi2 chargers.

✅ Conclusion

The Xiaomi 17 series offers not only more power but also record battery life.
The 17 Pro Max with a 7500 mAh battery and 120 W charging is one of the most efficient flagships of 2025/2026. If battery life and fast charging are your priorities – this version definitely outperforms the previous series 15.

👉 Check out fast chargers for Xiaomi 17

System and features

What’s new in HyperOS 3.0 and Android 16?

The Xiaomi 17 series features the latest version of the interface — HyperOS 3.0, based on Android 16. The system introduces, among other things:

a refreshed interface with faster animations and less delay,
better energy management and RAM optimization — which positively affects smooth operation and multitasking,
new “Cross-Device” features and AI assistants that better integrate the phone with other Xiaomi devices (e.g., TV, headphones, tablet).
Additionally, the HyperOS 3.0 update in the 17 models has been confirmed with version 3.0.17.0, containing stability fixes and optimizations for the rear screen and gaming.

🔹 Pro and Pro Max Versions – rear screen, UWB, and advanced features

In the 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max models, hardware and software features not available in the base version have been added:

OLED rear screen (“Dynamic Back Display”) with a diagonal of ~2.7″–2.9″, allowing for camera preview, notifications, or wallpaper personalization.
support for UWB (Ultra Wide Band) technology – used for precise device location and better integration with accessories (e.g., headphones, locators).
better cooling, larger memory (up to 1 TB), which translates to even smoother operation and greater future-proofing of the smartphone.

Price and availability

which Xiaomi is more worth it?

Xiaomi 17 debuted in China in October 2025 and will hit the global market in 2026. Prices remain similar to Xiaomi 15 – around 4500 PLN for the 12/256 GB version.

Xiaomi 15 is already available in Poland and currently costs about 3779 PLN, and after the release of the newer model, it will be possible to buy it even cheaper.

💸 Conclusion: if you want to save money – choose Xiaomi 15. If you care about maximum performance and battery – Xiaomi 17 will be a better choice.

🏁 Final opinion – which model to choose?

After analyzing all key aspects — performance, screen, cameras, battery, system, and price — here’s a summary of which model will be best in a specific situation:

✅ If you care about maximum performance and the best possible smartphone for years, choose:

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — the largest display (6.9″), huge battery (~7500 mAh), 5× optical zoom, rear OLED screen, full UWB support, latest processor.
Xiaomi 17 Pro — if you want a compromise: basically the same components as in Pro Max, but slightly smaller dimensions and a lower price.

✅ If you want a great flagship, but don’t necessarily need absolutely top parameters – for many users, the best choice will be:

Xiaomi 17 – the “basic” flagship of the 17 series: Gen 5 processor, large battery (~7000 mAh), improved camera and display — still a huge leap compared to the 15 series, but in a more accessible size.

💡 If you have a limited budget or don’t need all the “features” of the new generation — the ideal choice will be:

Xiaomi 15 – great performance, very good camera set, compact form, and attractive price. It’s still a flagship that will meet expectations in everyday use.

📣 Stay updated – when Xiaomi 17 becomes available in Poland, you will find all accessories for Xiaomi 17: cases, screen protectors, chargers, and more!

⭐ FAQ – frequently asked questions about Xiaomi 15 and Xiaomi 17

⭐ Does the case for Xiaomi 15 fit Xiaomi 17?

No, each model has different dimensions and camera placements. The case from the 15 series will not fit Xiaomi 17 – it’s worth choosing dedicated accessories.

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 have a better camera than Xiaomi 15?

Yes – primarily thanks to the new Light Fusion 950 sensor and a 50 MP selfie camera with autofocus. The Pro and Pro Max versions also offer 5× optical zoom and better night photos.

⭐ How long does Xiaomi 17 last on battery?

Depending on the model, from 9 to 12 hours of SoT (screen on time).
The Pro Max version with a 7500 mAh battery can last up to two days without charging with moderate use.

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 have wireless charging?

Yes, the entire 17 series supports 50 W wireless charging and 22.5 W reverse charging, allowing you to power up headphones, a smartwatch, or another phone.

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 have a rear display?

Yes, the Pro and Pro Max versions have an additional 2.7–2.9 inch OLED display on the back panel – for selfies, notifications, and personalization.

⭐ Is it worth buying Xiaomi 15 in 2025?

Yes. Despite the launch of the 17 series, Xiaomi 15 is still one of the best-priced flagships – it offers high performance, an AMOLED display, and Leica cameras, and its price has dropped below 3800 PLN.

⭐ When will Xiaomi 17 be available in Poland?

The global premiere is planned for Q1 2026 when the 17 series will be officially available for sale in Europe.

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 support UWB and the latest AI features?

Yes – the 17 Pro and Pro Max models have an UWB (Ultra Wide Band) module and AI features in HyperOS 3.0 (e.g. scene recognition, speech transcription, interface personalization).

⭐ How much do Xiaomi 15 and Xiaomi 17 cost in Poland?

Xiaomi 17 (12/256 GB) – estimated around 4,500 PLN after the global premiere

Xiaomi 15 (12/256 GB) – approx. 3,779 PLN

2026-03-15

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra or F7 Ultra – which is better?

The new Poco F8 Ultra offers a larger battery (6500 mAh), a better camera (5x periscope), Bose subwoofer speakers, and a top Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 processor. The older F7 Ultra still tempts with a sharper WQHD+ display, faster 120 W charging, and a lower price.

📊 Comparison Table: Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs F8 Ultra

Parameter	Poco F7 Ultra	Poco F8 Ultra
Display	6.67″ WQHD+ AMOLED, 120 Hz	6.9″ AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Camera (rear)	50 + 50 (tele 2.5x) + 32 Mpix (ultra)	50 + 50 (5x periscope) + 50 Mpix (ultra)
Camera (front)	32 Mpix, FHD video	32 Mpix, 4K video
Battery	5300 mAh	6500 mAh
Charging	120 W wired, 50 W wireless	100 W wired, 50 W wireless, 22.5 W reverse
Audio	Stereo 2.0 (Dolby Atmos)	Stereo 2.1 + Bose subwoofer
System	Android 15, HyperOS 2	Android 16, HyperOS 3
Connectivity	5G, Wi-Fi 7-ready, Bluetooth 5.4, IR, NFC	5G + eSIM, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, IR, NFC
Price (PL)	1875 zł (12/256 GB), 1999.99 zł (16/512 GB)	2699 zł (12/256 GB), 2999 zł (16/512 GB)

What does the Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra casing look like?

What distinguishes the Denim Blue version with Bose subwoofer?

Poco F8 Ultra in the Denim Blue variant stands out with its vivid, unique design. The back with a texture resembling denim fabric gives the device a stylish yet modern character. It is not real fabric, but the visual and tactile effect is very realistic. At the top of the casing, there is a Bose logo, indicating an unusual addition – a third bass speaker, serving as a subwoofer. As a result, the F8 Ultra offers fuller, deeper sound than most smartphones – especially when playing music and movies without headphones.

Are both smartphones waterproof?

Both Poco F7 Ultra and F8 Ultra are designed with everyday durability in mind. Both models feature a metal frame, which ensures structural solidity and an elegant finish. Additionally, they meet the IP68 standard, meaning they are resistant to dirt and immersion in water – up to a depth of 1.5 m for a maximum of 30 minutes. This is a useful feature, especially in the rain, during workouts, or on vacation.

Dimensions and comfort – which model fits better in the hand?

Model	Dimensions (mm)	Weight
F8 Ultra	163.33 × 77.82 × 8.05	220 g
F7 Ultra	160.26 × 74.95 × 8.39	212 g

F8 Ultra is slightly larger, but at the same time it is thinner than its predecessor. Thanks to the rounded edges and well-balanced center of gravity, it remains comfortable to use, even with one hand. F7 Ultra is lighter and narrower – more compact, which may be appreciated by those who prefer smaller devices.

What colors are the models available in?

Poco F7 Ultra: classic black and vibrant, recognizable yellow

Poco F8 Ultra: elegant black, pure white and unique Denim Blue

The Denim Blue version is the strongest stylistic accent in the POCO lineup – it combines aesthetics with functionality (Bose speaker) and makes the device stand out from the competition.

➡️ Check the case for Poco F7 Ultra, if you want to protect the device without losing style.

➡️ In the case of F8 Ultra, check out accessories for Poco F8 Ultra – you will soon find all the necessary additions there, such as tempered glass for Poco F8 Ultra or case for Poco F8 Ultra.

Poco F8 Ultra Display vs F7 Ultra

Larger screen vs higher resolution – which provides a better effect?

Poco F8 Ultra features a larger, 6.90-inch AMOLED LTPS display with a resolution of 1200 × 2608 px (~416 ppi). The 19.5:9 aspect ratio makes the screen wider and more spacious, ideal for movies, multitasking, and gaming.

Poco F7 Ultra has a smaller, but noticeably sharper display: 6.67″ WQHD+ (1440 × 3200 px), which results in ~526 ppi. This provides noticeably better detail, especially when reading small fonts or browsing photos.

Refresh Rate and Brightness – Are There Any Differences?

Both models offer a smooth 120 Hz, HDR10+ and Dolby Vision.
F8 Ultra: up to 3500 nits brightness – screen is great visible in sunlight.
F7 Ultra: also very bright (up to 3200 nits), but slightly lags behind the newer model.

In summary:

F7 Ultra – more detailed image, ideal for text work
F8 Ultra – larger, brighter screen, great for multimedia

Processor and Performance – Which Poco is Stronger in Daily Use?

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Elite Gen 5 – How Do They Perform in Tests?

Poco F7 Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB) processor with a clock speed of up to 4.32 GHz. At the time of its release, it was one of the most powerful mobile chipsets, offering excellent performance in games and applications.

F8 Ultra takes it a step further — it features the latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) with a clock speed of up to 4.6 GHz and improved energy architecture (3 nm). In benchmarks like AnTuTu, the differences are clear:

AnTuTu: F8 Ultra approaches 3.86 million points, F7 Ultra around 2.63 million
Geekbench: F8 Ultra has about 24–25% higher single-core and multi-core performance

RAM and storage – has anything changed?

Both smartphones offer top configurations:

12 GB or 16 GB LPDDR5X RAM
256 GB or 512 GB UFS 4.1 storage
❌ No microSD card slot – you cannot expand the storage

System performance, loading applications or games with maximum details – in both cases it works great, but F8 Ultra provides a greater power reserve for the future.

Summary:

Camera – is Poco F8 Ultra the new leader in mobile photography?

What can the main lenses in F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra do?

Both models have very good, 50-megapixel main cameras with a large aperture (f/1.6–1.7) and optical image stabilization (OIS). This guarantees great photos during the day, good results after dark, and smooth shots in motion.

However, differences appear with the additional lenses.

Poco F8 Ultra – a strong advantage in zoom and wide angle

Ultrawide angle: 50 Mpix (vs 32 Mpix in F7 Ultra) – better detail and less distortion
Periscope telephoto lens: 50 Mpix with 5x optical zoom and OIS (vs 2.5x zoom in F7 Ultra)
Front camera: 32 Mpix – in F8 Ultra it records 4K, in F7 Ultra only 1080p

F8 Ultra offers better close-ups, more details, and more advanced photographic capabilities. Additionally, thanks to the periscope, photos taken from a distance maintain sharpness and quality.

F7 Ultra – still very solid optics

Great main camera with OIS
2.5x optical zoom with telephoto lens
Good daytime and nighttime shots
32 Mpix front selfie

In summary:

F8 Ultra – better zoom, better wide angle, better video with selfies
F7 Ultra – good main camera, decent telephoto lens

Battery and charging – which Poco lasts longer, and which charges faster?

Which one has a larger battery and better battery life?

POCO F8 Ultra clearly wins in terms of capacity – it has a 6500 mAh battery that provides a very long usage time even with intensive use. POCO F7 Ultra has a slightly smaller 5300 mAh battery, which also lasts all day, but offers a shorter screen-on time.

How do fast charging and wireless technologies look?

F7 Ultra supports very fast 120 W wired charging (full charge in about 30 minutes), as well as 50 W wireless charging and 10–15 W reverse charging.
F8 Ultra supports 100 W wired charging, 50 W wireless charging and 22.5 W reverse charging.

Which model is better in terms of charging and battery?

F8 Ultra – longer usage time, larger capacity, and stronger reverse charging
F7 Ultra – faster wired charging, slightly smaller battery

➡️ Need fast charging? Check out the available fast chargers for Poco F8 Ultra, compatible with Power Delivery technology.

➡️ For the older model, there are also chargers for Poco F7 Ultra, perfect for fully utilizing its capabilities.

System and software – does the new Android and HyperOS make a difference?

Android 16 vs Android 15 – what has changed?

Poco F8 Ultra debuts with the latest Android 16, complemented by HyperOS 3, which is another version of the Xiaomi overlay created after moving away from MIUI. This system offers better optimization, AI support, smoother animations, and better integration with other Xiaomi devices.

Poco F7 Ultra uses Android 15 and HyperOS 2, which still provides great smoothness, but may receive one update less in the future.

What does HyperOS offer in practice?

Advanced interface customization
Intelligent memory manager
Gaming mode and advanced sound options
Longer support for F8 Ultra (Android updates + security)

In everyday use, both phones operate very smoothly. But if you care about longer support and newer AI features, F8 Ultra is the better future-proof choice.

Memory and storage – is it worth paying extra for the 512 GB version?

What memory variants do Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra offer?

Both models are available in identical configurations:

12 GB or 16 GB RAM (standard LPDDR5X – fast and energy-efficient)
256 GB or 512 GB internal storage (UFS 4.1 – very fast read/write)

This means that regardless of the model, you can count on top performance in multitasking, gaming, video editing, or storing large files.

Can memory be expanded with a microSD card?

❌ Unfortunately no. Neither the F8 Ultra nor the F7 Ultra have a memory card slot. This means that it’s worth deciding on the appropriate capacity right away – if you take a lot of photos, record 4K video, or use many offline games or applications, the 512 GB variant will be a safer choice.

Brief comparison:

Both models offer fast memory and plenty of RAM
No microSD – the choice of capacity matters right away
F8 Ultra with 512 GB is a sensible investment “for years”

Connectivity and sound – which Poco has better audio and eSIM?

Do both models have 5G, Wi-Fi 7, and modern ports?

Yes – both Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra support the latest connectivity standards:

5G dual SIM (supports two nanoSIM cards simultaneously)
Wi-Fi 7 – the fastest standard, backward compatible with Wi-Fi 6 and 5
Bluetooth:
- F8 Ultra: 6.0
- F7 Ultra: 5.4
NFC – for contactless payments on both
USB-C:
- F8 Ultra: USB 3.2
- F7 Ultra: USB 2.0
F8 Ultra additionally supports eSIM – a convenient solution for travelers

Does the sound differ as well?

Definitely yes! Poco F8 Ultra has an advantage in the audio system:

F8 Ultra: the first smartphone with triple 2.1 speaker setup – two stereo + Bose subwoofer
F7 Ultra: stereo with Dolby

Which Poco Ultra is worth choosing?

Poco F8 Ultra is a more modern, more efficient, and more multimedia-oriented model:

✅ larger battery (6500 mAh)
✅ more powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5)
✅ better additional cameras (5x zoom, 50 Mpix ultra wide)
✅ higher screen brightness and Bose subwoofer
✅ eSIM, USB 3.2, longer software support

On the other hand, Poco F7 Ultra still has its strengths:

✅ sharper screen (WQHD+)
✅ faster charging (120 W)
✅ solid camera set and great design
✅ often lower price (especially the 12/256 GB version)

In summary:

Choose Poco F8 Ultra if you care about maximum performance, cameras, and sound
Opt for F7 Ultra if you want a great flagship at a better price and with a sharper screen

Frequently Asked Questions about Poco F8 Ultra and Poco F7 Ultra

What screen does the Poco F8 Ultra have and is it better than the F7 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra has a larger 6.9″ AMOLED screen (~1.5K) and very high brightness – up to 3500 nits.
The Poco F7 Ultra has a sharper 6.67″ WQHD+ display (526 ppi).
Choose the F8 Ultra if visibility is important to you, or the F7 Ultra if you value image sharpness.

Does the Poco F8 Ultra have better sound than the F7 Ultra?

Yes – the F8 Ultra offers a unique 2.1 speaker system with a Bose subwoofer.
This is the first Poco smartphone with a dedicated subwoofer.

Does the Poco F8 Ultra have eSIM and USB 3.2?

Yes, the F8 Ultra supports eSIM and fast USB-C 3.2.
The F7 Ultra does not offer eSIM and uses a USB 2.0 port.

Which model has a better camera: Poco F7 Ultra or F8 Ultra?

F8 Ultra has 3 cameras 50 Mpix (main, ultra wide, and 5x tele), each with OIS.
F7 Ultra has a weaker ultra-wide (32 Mpix) and a 2.5x telephoto lens.
F8 Ultra wins in terms of zoom, detail, and night shots.

How long does the battery last in Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra?

F8 Ultra has a larger 6500 mAh battery and lasts noticeably longer.
F7 Ultra with 5300 mAh charges faster (120 W), but offers shorter usage time.

Is it worth buying Poco F8 Ultra in 2025?

Yes, Poco F8 Ultra is one of the most advanced smartphones in its class. Great performance, a triple 50 Mpix camera, and a Bose subwoofer make it still a very cost-effective choice.

2026-03-14

The Best Accessories for Google Pixel 10a — Cases, Glass Protectors, and Chargers for 2026

The best case for the Pixel 10a is the Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN) — transparent with raised edges and Air Cushion technology. The cheapest? The Bizon Case Salpa for 25 PLN. The Pixel 10a has a plastic back, so a case is not a luxury, but a necessity.

The Google Pixel 10a debuted on March 5, 2026. For 549 EUR, you get a Tensor G4 processor, a 48 MP camera with OIS, a 120 Hz display with Gorilla Glass 7i, and a 5100 mAh battery with 30W charging. It’s a great smartphone for its price — but it has a plastic back that scratches easily.

In this guide, you will find the best accessories for the Pixel 10a: cases starting from 25 PLN, tempered glass, and chargers that utilize the full potential of 30W fast charging.

Tip: The Pixel 10a supports 10W Qi wireless charging, but it does not have native MagSafe or Qi2. Cases with a magnetic ring (e.g., Tech-Protect or Ringke MagSafe) add compatibility with MagSafe accessories.

Check the full range of accessories for the Pixel 10a →

Ranking: 5 best cases for the Pixel 10a

1. Spigen Ultra Hybrid — transparent with Air Cushion (59 PLN)

Our choice

Spigen Ultra Hybrid is a proven series — a transparent polycarbonate back with a flexible TPU frame. Air Cushion technology in the corners absorbs impacts, and raised edges protect the screen and camera.

Air Cushion Technology — air cushions in the corners
Transparent back — shows the original color of the Pixel 10a
Raised edges — screen and camera protection
Precise cutouts for all ports and buttons

The Pixel 10a has a flat camera module (without a protruding “island”), so the case sits perfectly on any surface. For 59 PLN, you get Spigen’s proven quality and assurance of fit.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU + polycarbonate
Type	Transparent
MagSafe	❌
Price	59 PLN

2. Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe — magnetic transparent (65 PLN)

Pixel 10a does not have native MagSafe, but Ringke Fusion Magnetic adds a built-in magnetic ring. Thanks to it, you can use magnetic chargers, power banks, and car mounts — just like iPhone users.

Built-in MagSafe ring — compatibility with magnetic chargers and accessories
Transparent polycarbonate — resistant to yellowing
Raised edges around the screen and camera
Precise cutouts for USB-C and speakers

At 65 PLN, this is the most expensive case in the comparison, but the only transparent one with full MagSafe. If you plan to use wireless chargers or magnetic mounts, it’s the best choice.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU + polycarbonate
Type	Transparent
MagSafe	✅
Price	65 PLN

3. Tech-Protect Flexair Hybrid MagSafe — budget MagSafe (35 PLN)

Best price with MagSafe

Tech-Protect Flexair is half the price of Ringke, yet offers the same key features: a transparent hybrid with a built-in magnetic ring. The hybrid construction (TPU + PC) combines the flexibility of the frame with a hard, scratch-resistant back.

MagSafe — built-in magnetic ring
Hybrid TPU + PC — rigid back, flexible frame
Transparent — visible original color of the phone
Raised edges around the screen and camera

At 35 PLN, it offers the best price-to-functionality ratio in the comparison. If you want MagSafe for the Pixel 10a and don’t want to overpay, Tech-Protect Flexair is a perfect choice.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU + polycarbonate
Type	Transparent
MagSafe	✅
Price	35 PLN

4. 3MK Armor Case — armored protection (49.90 PLN)

3MK Armor Case is a rugged case with reinforced corners and a textured back that doesn’t slip from your hand. The design absorbs impacts more effectively than standard TPU cases.

Reinforced corners — enhanced protection during falls
Textured back — non-slip surface
Matte finish — does not collect fingerprints
Raised edges around the screen and camera

The plastic back of the Pixel 10a is particularly prone to scratches. The 3MK Armor Case ensures that even a fall on concrete won’t result in a crack. At 49.90 PLN, it’s a solid rugged case from a Polish brand.

Parameter	Value
Material	Reinforced TPU
Type	Armored
MagSafe	❌
Price	49.90 PLN

5. Bizon Case Salpa — the cheapest protection (25 PLN)

Lowest price

Flexible TPU case for 25 PLN. Bizon Case Salpa is a minimalist, transparent cover that protects against scratches and light falls. It lacks Air Cushion and MagSafe, but it does what it needs to do — at a minimal price.

Flexible TPU — easy to put on and take off
Transparent — visible design of the Pixel 10a
Raised edges around the screen
Slim profile — does not add unnecessary thickness

Perfect as a temporary case right after purchasing a phone or for those who do not need advanced protection. For 25 PLN, it’s hard to find a better option to start with.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU
Type	Transparent, flexible
MagSafe	❌
Price	25 PLN

Comparison of cases for Pixel 10a

Case	Brand	Type	MagSafe	Feature	Price
Ultra Hybrid	Spigen	Transparent	❌	Air Cushion, top brand	59 PLN
Fusion Magnetic	Ringke	Transparent	✅	MagSafe + yellowing resistance	65 PLN
Flexair Hybrid	Tech-Protect	Transparent	✅	Cheapest MagSafe	35 PLN
Armor Case	3MK	Armored	❌	Reinforced corners	49.90 PLN
Salpa	Bizon	Flexible	❌	Lowest price	25 PLN

Our choice: Depends on the priority. MagSafe for cheap? Tech-Protect Flexair (35 PLN). Proven brand? Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN). Minimum expenses? Bizon Salpa (25 PLN).

Tempered glass for Pixel 10a

Pixel 10a has Gorilla Glass 7i on the front — it’s durable glass, but it’s not indestructible when dropped on concrete. Tempered glass adds a protective layer for a few dozen PLN.

Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ 2-pack (25 PLN) — two glasses in a set for the price of one from the competition. Compatible with Pixel 9a and 10a (same screen size). The black frame masks the edges and gives an elegant look. Best value in this category.

Ringke Tempered Glass 2-pack (39 zł) — premium option with an oleophobic coating (resistant to fingerprints) and a hardness of 9H. Two glasses in the set — one for now, the other as a spare.

3MK FlexibleGlass (34,90 zł) — hybrid glass that combines the flexibility of a film with the hardness of glass. It does not shatter upon impact like traditional tempered glass. One piece in the package.

Chargers and power banks for Pixel 10a

Pixel 10a supports 30W charging via cable (USB PD 3.0) and 10W wirelessly (Qi). To take advantage of the full charging speed, you need a USB PD charger with a minimum power of 30W.

Wall charger — look for models with USB-C PD 30W+. A GaN charger (gallium nitride) will be compact and efficient. Check wall chargers at homescreen.pl.

Power bank — minimum 10,000 mAh with USB-C PD. If you bought a case with MagSafe (e.g., Ringke or Tech-Protect), a magnetic power bank will stick to the phone and charge it wirelessly. Power banks at homescreen.pl.

USB-C Cable — The Pixel 10a has USB-C 3.2, so you need a USB-C to USB-C cable that supports PD 30W+. Most cables in the box are 2.0 versions — a 3.2 cable will be useful for data transfer.

FAQ — Frequently Asked Questions about Pixel 10a Accessories

Does the Pixel 10a support MagSafe?
Not natively. The Pixel 10a has Qi standard (10W), but not MagSafe or Qi2. Cases with a built-in magnetic ring (e.g., Ringke Fusion Magnetic, Tech-Protect Flexair MagSafe) add compatibility with MagSafe accessories.

Do cases from the Pixel 9a fit the Pixel 10a?
No. The Pixel 10a has different dimensions (153.9 x 73 x 9 mm) than the Pixel 9a. Cases are not interchangeable between models. Tempered glass may be compatible — e.g., Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ is labeled as “Pixel 9a / 10a”.

What charger for the Pixel 10a?
A USB-C charger with PD (Power Delivery) of at least 30W. This provides full charging speed — 50% battery in 30 minutes.

Is the Pixel 10a waterproof?
Yes, it has an IP68 rating — dustproof and waterproof up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. A case is not required for waterproofing, but it protects against scratches and drops.

Does the Pixel 10a have a glass back?
No. The Pixel 10a has a plastic back — this is one of the reasons why a case is particularly important. Plastic scratches more easily than glass and doesn’t look as good after a few months without protection.

How much do accessories for the Pixel 10a cost?
Cases range from 25 PLN (Bizon Salpa) to 65 PLN (Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe). Tempered glass ranges from 25 PLN (Tech-Protect 2-pack) to 39 PLN (Ringke 2-pack). A complete protection set (case + glass) can be purchased for 50–100 PLN.

Summary

The Pixel 10a is a great smartphone, but the plastic back needs protection. The good news is that accessories are cheap — you can buy a complete set (case + tempered glass) for just 50 PLN.

Key takeaways:

Best quality: Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN) — Air Cushion, transparent, trusted brand
Best with MagSafe: Ringke Fusion Magnetic (65 PLN) — magnetic ring + transparent
Best price-to-value ratio: Tech-Protect Flexair MagSafe (35 PLN) — MagSafe for half the price of Ringke
Rugged: 3MK Armor Case (49.90 PLN) — reinforced corners, Polish brand
Cheapest: Bizon Case Salpa (25 PLN) — minimum for minimum

Don’t forget about tempered glass — Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ for 25 PLN (2 pieces!) is an absolute must-have.

Check all accessories for Pixel 10a at homescreen.pl →

2026-03-12

iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra – which flagship to choose in 2026?

If you care about the Apple ecosystem, stability, and great video — the better choice will be the iPhone 17 Pro Max.

On the other hand, if you prioritize maximum specifications, a 200 MP camera, S Pen, and greater control over the system — the Galaxy S26 Ultra offers more technology.

6,299 PLN for the iPhone 17 Pro Max. 6,499 PLN for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. The difference? 200 PLN and two completely different ecosystems. On paper, both phones have 6.9-inch screens, flagship processors, and cameras that make DSLRs from a few years ago look pale in comparison. But the devil is in the details.

If you’re wondering which one will be your companion for the next 3-4 years, this article will help you make an informed decision.

📊 Specifications – iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Before we get into the details, here’s a comparison of the key parameters side by side:

Parameter	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Display	6.9″ OLED, 2868×1320, 460 ppi	6.9″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 498 ppi
Brightness	1000/1600/3000 nits	~1750/2600 nits
Processor	Apple A19 Pro	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
RAM	12 GB (unofficially)	12/16 GB
Storage	256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB / 2 TB	256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB
Main Camera	48 MP f/1.78	200 MP f/1.4
Ultrawide	48 MP f/2.2 (120°)	50 MP f/1.9
Telephoto	48 MP 4x f/2.8 (8x optical)	50 MP 5x + 10 MP 3x
Selfie	18 MP f/1.9	12 MP f/2.2
Video	4K Dolby Vision 120fps, ProRes	8K 30fps, 4K 120fps
Battery	4,823 mAh	5,000 mAh
Charging	40 W wired, 25 W MagSafe	60 W wired, 25 W Qi2.2
Dimensions	163.4 x 78.0 x 8.75 mm	163.6 x 78.1 x 7.90 mm
Weight	233 g	214 g
Protection	Ceramic Shield 2, IP68 (6 m)	Gorilla Armor, IP68
Material	Aluminum, Ceramic Shield	Titanium
System	iOS 26	Android 16 + One UI
S Pen / stylus	❌	✅
Price (256 GB)	6,299 zł	6,499 zł

At first glance, it’s clear: these are two different approaches to a flagship. Samsung focuses on camera resolution and faster charging, while Apple emphasizes the video ecosystem and memory capacity. Let’s get into the details.

⚡ Performance and Processor

A19 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

The iPhone 17 Pro Max is powered by Apple A19 Pro — a chip manufactured using a 2 nm process with a 6-core CPU and a 6-core GPU featuring hardware ray tracing. Samsung counters with the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 from Qualcomm, which Samsung uses in all regions (no more Exynos in Europe).

Benchmarks vs Reality

In Geekbench 6 tests, Samsung surprised: the Galaxy S26 Ultra scored 11,738 points in multi-core — about 20% more than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (~9,700 pts). Single-core? Samsung also leads with a score of 3,852 points.

Does this mean that Samsung is faster in everyday use? Not necessarily. iOS traditionally optimizes resources better, so an iPhone with less RAM (12 GB vs 16 GB in the top version of Samsung) can perform just as smoothly. The differences in benchmarks mainly translate to:

Video and 3D graphics rendering — here Samsung has a measurable advantage
Multitasking with multiple heavy applications — 16 GB of RAM gives Samsung a buffer
Everyday applications (social media, browser, maps) — both phones operate at the same speed

💡 Tip: If you are not rendering video on your phone and not playing the latest 3D games, you simply won’t notice any performance differences between these two flagships.

Display – iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Resolution, brightness, and screen features

The iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra offer large, 6.9-inch OLED displays with a refresh rate of 120 Hz. However, this is where the similarities between the screens of both flagships essentially end.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a higher screen resolution — 3120 × 1440 px (498 ppi), while iPhone 17 Pro Max offers 2868 × 1320 px (460 ppi). In practice, you will notice the difference in sharpness mainly when viewing text or images very closely. In everyday use, both displays are simply phenomenally sharp.

Where does the iPhone 17 Pro Max catch up? Screen brightness. Apple claims even up to 3000 nits at peak (e.g., in full sunlight) — this is one of the highest values on the smartphone market. Galaxy S26 Ultra reaches about 2600 nits, so in very bright conditions, the iPhone may be slightly more readable.

However, Samsung has something that we won’t find in the iPhone — the Privacy Display feature. This technology limits the screen viewing angle, so people sitting next to you on the bus or train won’t see your messages or banking app. In terms of privacy, this is a very practical solution.

Feature	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Resolution	2868×1320 (460 ppi)	3120×1440 (498 ppi)
Peak Brightness	3,000 nits	~2,600 nits
Privacy Display	❌	✅
Glass	Ceramic Shield 2	Gorilla Armor
Always-On Display	✅	✅

💡With such large and bright screens, it’s worth considering their protection — tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max and tempered glass for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra can be found at homescreen.pl

📸 Camera and Photography

This is where the most interesting part of the comparison begins. Both phones have camera systems that compete with compact cameras, but they approach photography from different angles.

Main Camera: 48 MP vs 200 MP

Samsung boasts a 200 MP with an aperture of f/1.4 — the brightest aperture in Galaxy history. It lets in 47% more light than the S25 Ultra (f/1.7). The iPhone responds with a “modest” 48 MP, but with optical sensor-shift stabilization.

Is 200 MP better than 48 MP? By default, both phones take pictures at ~12 MP (through pixel binning). Samsung wins in situations where you want to pull out detail — the full 200 MP provides huge files for cropping. The iPhone focuses on color consistency across all three lenses.

Zoom: periscope system

Zoom	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Ultrawide	48 MP, 0.5x	50 MP, 0.6x
Main	48 MP, 1x-2x	200 MP, 1x
Telephoto #1	—	10 MP, 3x
Telephoto #2	48 MP, 4x (8x optical)	50 MP, 5x
Max digital zoom	40x	100x (Space Zoom AI)

Samsung offers two telephoto lenses (3x and 5x), providing greater flexibility. The iPhone has one 4x telephoto lens, but with the ability to crop to 8x without loss of quality (thanks to the 48 MP sensor). In practice, both systems deliver excellent results up to ~10x zoom. Above that, Samsung leads with its 100x Space Zoom supported by AI.

Selfies and Portrait Mode

The iPhone wins in selfies — 18 MP with autofocus and Center Stage vs 12 MP on Samsung. Center Stage automatically crops the shot, tracking your face during video calls. Samsung has HDR10+ in selfies, but with lower resolution.

🎬 Video and Filming

This is a category where the iPhone traditionally dominates — and the 17 Pro Max maintains this position.

iPhone 17 Pro Max records 4K Dolby Vision up to 120 fps and supports ProRes — a format used in professional post-production. Slow-motion in 4K at 120 fps is a quality that just 3 years ago required a camera costing several thousand zlotys. Additionally, Spatial Video for Apple Vision Pro.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra records 8K at 30 fps — higher resolution on paper, but 30 fps limits smoothness. In 4K, Samsung offers up to 120 fps, which levels the playing field. However, there is no equivalent to ProRes — Samsung’s files are compressed.

Feature	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Max resolution	4K 120 fps (Dolby Vision)	8K 30 fps
ProRes / pro format	✅ ProRes 4K 120 fps	❌
Slow-motion	4K 120fps, 1080p 240fps	4K 120fps, 1080p 240fps
Spatial Video	✅	❌
Stabilization	Sensor-shift OIS	OIS

Verdict: If filming is a priority for you, the iPhone has no competition in the smartphone segment. If you mainly record short clips for social media, both phones perform excellently.

🔋 Battery and Charging

Battery capacity and charging speed

Samsung has a larger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,823 mAh), but the iPhone compensates with better energy optimization. Apple claims 39 hours of video playback for the Pro Max — one of the best results on the market.

Where does Samsung clearly win? Wired charging.

Charging	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Wired	40 W (50% in 20 min)	60 W (75% in 30 min)
Wireless	25 W (MagSafe/Qi2)	25 W (Qi2.2)
Reverse charging	✅ (MagSafe)	✅ (4.5 W)

Samsung charges significantly faster via wired — 60 W vs 40 W. If you forgot to charge your phone overnight, Samsung will get back to 75% in half an hour. The iPhone takes longer, although 50% in 20 minutes is still a decent result.

Wireless charging is a tie — 25 W on both sides. Both support reverse charging (charging headphones or a watch from the phone).

🤖 AI and Software

This is a category that in 2026 becomes one of the most important differentiators. Both phones offer advanced AI features, but in different styles.

Apple Intelligence

Apple Intelligence operates deeply within iOS 26. Key features:

Siri with context — understands what is on the screen, continues the conversation, executes complex commands
Writing tools — summarization, tone correction, rewriting text in any application
Genmoji — generating personalized emojis from a description
Image Playground — creating AI images in illustration style
Notification prioritization — AI sorts notifications by importance

Galaxy AI

Samsung Galaxy AI in S26 Ultra offers:

Real-time conversation translation — during phone calls, without internet
Circle to Search — circle anything on the screen to search for it
Generative Edit — filling in photo fragments with AI-generated content
Note Assist — note summaries, transcription of recordings
Privacy Display AI — intelligent dimming of the screen when someone is looking from the side

Updates — how many years of support?

Here is the key difference. Apple traditionally supports iPhones for 6-7 years of iOS updates. Samsung promises 7 years of system and security updates starting with the S24 series — matching Apple.

In practice, both phones purchased today will receive updates until 2032-2033. This means that an investment of ~6,300 PLN is spread over at least 7 years of support.

💰 Price and Value for Money

How much does the iPhone 17 Pro Max cost vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

Variant	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
256 GB	6,299 PLN	6,499 PLN
512 GB	7,299 PLN	7,499 PLN
1 TB	8,299 PLN	9,499 PLN
2 TB	10,299 PLN	❌ not available

iPhone 17 Pro Max is about 200 PLN cheaper than the Galaxy S26 Ultra in every memory variant. In practice, this means that regardless of the chosen version — 256 GB, 512 GB, or 1 TB — the Apple smartphone remains slightly more affordable.

Additionally, Apple is the only one offering a variant with as much as 2 TB of memory, which we won’t find in the Galaxy S26 Ultra. This can be especially significant for those recording a lot of high-quality video or photographers working with ProRAW and ProRes files, which can take up a lot of space.

💡 Tip: If 256 GB turns out to be too little, and 1 TB too much, the best compromise for most users will be the 512 GB variant. In both models, it costs around 7,300–7,500 PLN and offers enough space for photos, videos, and applications for several years of use.

iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra – summary

Which flagship will be the better choice?

After analyzing 8 categories, there is no clear winner. Both phones are phenomenal, but they target different users.

If you plan to purchase one of these flagships, it’s worth thinking about protection right away — a good case for the iPhone 17 Pro Max or case for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra will help secure the phone from the very first day of use.

iPhone 17 Pro Max — for whom?

Filmmakers and video creators — ProRes, Dolby Vision 4K 120fps, Spatial Video
Apple ecosystem users — Mac, iPad, AirPods, Apple Watch, Vision Pro
People valuing long-term value — iPhones hold their value longer in the secondary market
Photographers needing large storage — 2 TB option
People preferring simplicity — iOS is less customizable but more consistent

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — for whom?

S Pen users — notes, drawing, precise control
Photographers focusing on zoom — 100x Space Zoom, two telephoto lenses
People who value fast charging — 60 W wired
Multitaskers — DeX, split windows, 16 GB RAM
People who value screen privacy — Privacy Display is a unique feature

If you already have an iPhone or Samsung…

Changing ecosystems is not just about getting a new phone — it’s about changing your watch, headphones, subscriptions, and habits. If you’ve been in the Apple or Samsung ecosystem for years, switching to the other side is rarely worthwhile. Choose a newer model within your ecosystem.

Are you buying your first flagship? Check out both in the store. Hold them in your hand. See which interface feels more intuitive to you. For around 6,300-6,500 PLN, you can’t go wrong with either of them.

Regardless of whether you choose an iPhone or Samsung, it’s worth taking care of the right accessories right away — especially screen protection, a case, and a good charger. If you’re looking for proven models, check out our rankings and guides:

– Best tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max →
– Top 10 cases for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra →
– What charger for iPhone 17? →
– Best charger for Samsung Galaxy S25 →

FAQ – frequently asked questions

How much does the iPhone 17 Pro Max cost in Poland?
The iPhone 17 Pro Max starts at 6,299 PLN for the 256 GB version. The 512 GB variant costs 7,299 PLN, 1 TB — 8,299 PLN, and 2 TB — 10,299 PLN.

When is the release of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was released in the first quarter of 2026. The phone has been available in Polish stores since February 2026.

Which has a better camera — iPhone 17 Pro Max or Galaxy S26 Ultra?
It depends on the use case. Samsung excels in photography with high zoom (100x Space Zoom) and has a brighter main lens (f/1.4). The iPhone has better color consistency between lenses and dominates in video recording (ProRes, Dolby Vision 4K 120fps).

Which has longer update support?
Both offer 7 years of system and security updates. The iPhone 17 Pro Max will be supported until ~2032, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra — until ~2033.

Is it worth waiting for the S26 Ultra, or should I buy the S25 Ultra cheaper?
The S26 Ultra offers several significant upgrades: a brighter f/1.4 lens (vs f/1.7), Privacy Display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and next-generation Galaxy AI. If you find the S25 Ultra at a good price (below 5,000 PLN), it is still an excellent phone. But if you are buying for the next 3-4 years — the S26 Ultra is a better investment.

iPhone 17 Pro Max or Galaxy S26 Ultra — which is lighter?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra weighs 214 g — 19 g less than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 g). Samsung is also slimmer: 7.9 mm vs 8.75 mm.

2026-03-11

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Galaxy Buds 3 Pro – comparison

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are the latest wireless headphones from Samsung with Adaptive ANC 2.0, Bluetooth 6.1, and a weight of 5.1 g. Compared to Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, they offer better noise cancellation, longer battery life in tests, and head gesture support. They cost 1099 PLN compared to about 650-899 PLN for the older model. Which one to choose? Below is a detailed comparison.

Samsung presented the Samsung Buds 4 Pro on February 25, 2026, and sales in Poland started on March 11. This is the direct successor to the Samsung Buds 3 Pro from July 2024. Both Samsung headphone models have a dual-driver system (dynamic + planar), ANC, and IP57 water resistance, but differ in several significant aspects.

Looking for a case or accessories for your headphones? Check out accessories for Galaxy Buds 4 and 4 Pro and accessories for Galaxy Buds 3 and 3 Pro.

📊 Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro Specification

Parameter	Galaxy Buds 4 Pro	Galaxy Buds 3 Pro
Release	March 2026	July 2024
Low-frequency driver	11 mm dynamic	10.5 mm dynamic
High-frequency driver	5.4 mm planar	6.1 mm planar
ANC	Adaptive ANC 2.0	Adaptive ANC
Bluetooth	6.1	5.4
Codecs	SBC, AAC, LC3, SSC, SSC UHQ	SBC, AAC, LC3, SSC, SSC UHQ
Battery (earbud)	61 mAh	53 mAh
Battery (case)	530 mAh	515 mAh
Playback time (ANC on)	up to 6 h (tested: 6 h 1 min)	up to 6 h (tested: 4 h 31 min)
Playback time with case (ANC on)	up to 26 h	up to 26 h
Playback time (ANC off)	up to 7 h	up to 7 h
Playback time with case (ANC off)	up to 30 h	up to 30 h
Weight (earbud)	5.1 g	5.4 g
Weight (case)	approx. 44.3 g	46.5 g
Water resistance	IP57	IP57
Head gestures	yes (answer/reject calls)	no
Voice assistant	Gemini + Bixby simultaneously	Bixby or Google Assistant
Super Clear Call (SWB)	yes (with Galaxy S26)	no
Microphones	6 (including VPU)	6
Charging	USB-C + Qi wireless	USB-C + Qi wireless
Colors	Black, White, Pink Gold	Silver, White
Price in Poland	1099 PLN	1029 PLN (launch) / from approx. 650 PLN (current)

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro - three color variants (pink, white, black) in open cases

🔊 Sound quality of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro

Both models of Samsung in-ear headphones have a dual-driver system, but in the Buds 4 Pro, Samsung replaced both.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a larger 11 mm woofer (vs 10.5 mm). In practice, this provides about 20% more diaphragm area, resulting in deeper, more controlled bass. Reviewers from SoundGuys and What Hi-Fi describe the sound as energetic yet precise, with better instrument separation.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, on the other hand, have a larger 6.1 mm planar tweeter (vs 5.4 mm in Buds 4 Pro). Theoretically, this should provide an advantage in high frequencies, but tests show that the Buds 3 Pro tended to have overly strong bass that “bled” into the mids.

Audio codecs

Both models support the same codecs: SBC, AAC, LC3, and Samsung Seamless Codec (SSC UHQ) with a resolution of up to 24 bit/96 kHz. Neither supports LDAC or aptX. SSC UHQ requires a Samsung Galaxy S23 or newer smartphone with One UI 6.1.1+.

This means that you will only get the full sound quality with a Samsung smartphone. With an iPhone or phones from other brands, these Samsung wireless headphones are limited to AAC, which is a noticeable loss of quality compared to SSC UHQ.

Tuning and sound character

The Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a slightly darker tuning with less emphasis on the high frequencies. The bass is deep but does not dominate the rest of the range. The mid frequencies (vocals, acoustic instruments) sound cleaner than in the predecessor.

The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have a brighter tuning with more detail in the high frequencies. The soundstage is slightly wider, but the bass can be too expansive, which in some genres (e.g., EDM, hip-hop) leads to “muddiness” in the low frequencies.

The Buds 4 Pro win in sound quality. Better controlled bass, cleaner mid frequencies, and generally a more balanced presentation. The difference is not revolutionary, but it is noticeable.

🔇 ANC: Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro

This is one of the biggest leaps between generations of these Samsung headphones.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro feature Adaptive ANC 2.0, which monitors the environment in real-time and adjusts the noise cancellation to specific frequencies. In SoundGuys tests, these Samsung wireless earbuds reduced around 84% of ambient noise, placing them on par with AirPods Pro 3.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have first-generation Adaptive ANC, which operates based on programmed algorithms. It still provides effective noise reduction, but does not respond as dynamically to changing conditions.

The biggest improvement is seen in the range below 1 kHz, where the noise from air conditioning, fans, and street traffic resides. Both models struggle with sudden loud sounds.

Ambient Mode and Voice Detection

Both Samsung earbuds have:
– Voice Detection: automatic switching to ambient mode when you start speaking
– Ambient Mode: allowing sounds from the environment
– Adaptive EQ: adjustment to the shape of the ear

In ambient mode, Buds 4 Pro sound a bit more natural. The sounds from the environment do not have the “metallic” aftertaste that sometimes appeared in Buds 3 Pro. This is important if you use ambient mode on a daily basis (e.g., in the office).

Buds 4 Pro win this category. Adaptive ANC 2.0 is a real improvement, not a marketing slogan.

🎙️ Call Quality

Here the difference is most apparent and concerns both sides of the connection.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have 6 microphones with a VPU (Voice Pickup Unit) sensor, meaning bone conduction. Additionally, they feature Super Clear Call technology with a bandwidth of 16 kHz (Super Wideband), but only when paired with the Galaxy S26.

In a quiet environment, the voice sounds clear and natural. In noise, the microphone performs well, although there is a slight “digitalization” of the voice. The VPU captures vibrations from the jawbone, which helps isolate the voice from background noise.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro also have 6 microphones, but without the VPU sensor. They support AI noise cancellation, but reviewers rated the call quality as “below average,” especially in loud environments.

Super Clear Call is an exclusive feature of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro that doubles the voice bandwidth (from 8 kHz to 16 kHz). In practice, the caller hears you more clearly, and your voice sounds more natural. However, this requires the Galaxy S26, S26+, or S26 Ultra.

Winner: Buds 4 Pro. VPU and Super Clear Call are noticeable improvements, especially for those who make a lot of phone calls.

🔋 Samsung Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro Battery

On paper, both models look identical: 6 hours with ANC, 7 hours without ANC, 26/30 hours with the case. But tests from independent publications paint a different picture.

Parameter	Buds 4 Pro (test)	Buds 3 Pro (test)
ANC on (SoundGuys)	6 h 1 min	4 h 31 min
Headphone capacity	61 mAh	53 mAh
Case capacity	530 mAh	515 mAh

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro with a 61 mAh battery (15% more than Buds 3 Pro) achieved exactly 6 hours and 1 minute in SoundGuys tests with ANC on. This result is close to the manufacturer’s claims.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro with a 53 mAh battery lasted only 4 hours and 31 minutes in the same tests, which is 25% less than the claimed 6 hours.

Both models charge via USB-C and wirelessly (Qi). Samsung does not provide exact charging times, but in practice, fully charging the case with a cable takes about 1.5 hours. The earbuds themselves charge to full in about 50-60 minutes while in the case.

Battery: Advantage Buds 4 Pro. An hour and a half longer battery life in real conditions is a significant difference, especially during travel or long workouts.

🎨 Design and Comfort

Samsung has changed its approach to design in the Buds 4 Pro, focusing on premium materials.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have metal (aluminum) stems with a matte finish and delicate touch grooves. The case is flat, horizontal, with a transparent cover through which the earbuds are visible. Weighing 5.1 g per earbud makes them one of the lighter in this class.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have plastic stems with a backlit LED strip that lights up during pairing and notifications. The case is vertical, traditional, without a transparent cover. Weighing 5.4 g per earbud.

Fit and Ear Tips

The difference of 0.3 g per earbud sounds like nothing, but it matters during hours of wear. Both models come with 4 sizes of silicone ear tips (XS, S, M, L). Samsung claims that the Buds 4 Pro were designed based on the analysis of 100 million ear scans and 10,000 virtual simulations.

In practice, both models sit securely in the ear and are suitable for running and exercising. The IP57 certification means protection against dust and immersion in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes, which is sufficient for sweating during workouts.

Available colors:
– Buds 4 Pro: Black, White, Pink Gold
– Buds 3 Pro: Silver, White

A tie with a slight advantage for Buds 4 Pro. The aluminum stems look premium, and the lighter weight improves comfort. But if you like the LED on the stems of Buds 3 Pro, it’s a matter of taste.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro in silver - a pair of in-ear headphones

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro - charging case with a transparent lid

📱 Smart features and Samsung ecosystem

Head gestures (only Buds 4 Pro)

A new feature exclusive to Samsung Buds 4 Pro: nodding your head answers a call, shaking your head rejects it. Works only with Samsung phones. A small but useful novelty when your hands are busy while cooking, training, or cycling.

Voice assistant

Buds 4 Pro support both Gemini and Bixby simultaneously: you say “Hey Google” or “Hey Bixby” without needing to select in settings. Buds 3 Pro require choosing one assistant (Bixby, Google Assistant, or Siri).

Having a dual assistant means you can use Gemini for questions and searches, and Bixby for controlling your Samsung phone settings. It’s a convenient solution for Galaxy ecosystem users.

Spatial Audio and 360 Audio

Both Samsung headphone models support spatial audio with head tracking. The effect is most noticeable when watching movies on the Samsung Galaxy Tab. In music, Spatial Audio can be controversial as it widens the soundstage at the expense of precision.

Other Common Features

Both models have:
– Real-Time Interpreter: real-time conversation translation (requires Galaxy AI)
– Auracast: audio sharing via Bluetooth LE Audio (e.g., sharing music with a friend)
– SmartThings Find: locating lost earbuds
– Adapt Sound: sound personalization based on hearing tests
– Dialogue Boost: enhancing dialogues in movies and podcasts
– Fall Detection: automatic notification to emergency contacts

Compatibility with Phones

These Samsung earbuds work with both Android and iOS. However, you will only fully utilize their capabilities (SSC UHQ, head gestures, Super Clear Call, Galaxy AI) with a Samsung smartphone.

With an iPhone, you lose: head gestures, Super Clear Call, SSC UHQ codec, SmartThings Find, and automatic pairing. You are left with AAC, basic ANC, and touch controls. If you have an iPhone, consider AirPods Pro 3 as an alternative.

💰 Price of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro in Poland

Model	Launch Price	Current Price (March 2026)
Galaxy Buds 4 Pro	1099 PLN	1099 PLN
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro	1029 PLN	from approx. 650 PLN

This is the most important difference in this comparison. Samsung Buds 3 Pro, which launched at 1029 PLN, can now be purchased for 650-899 PLN (depending on the store and promotions). Galaxy Buds 4 Pro cost 1099 PLN without discounts.

The difference between the launch prices is only 70 PLN. But between the current price of Buds 3 Pro and Buds 4 Pro, it is even 200-450 PLN.

The question then comes down to: is Adaptive ANC 2.0, better battery performance in tests, head gestures, and Bluetooth 6.1 worth the extra 200-450 PLN?

If you are buying Samsung earbuds for several years and care about the best ANC and calls, the answer is yes. If you are looking for good value for money, Buds 3 Pro for 650-700 PLN are still great wireless earbuds from Samsung.

In Europe, the price of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro is 249 euros, which is identical to the launch price of Buds 3 Pro. In the USA, both models were priced at 249.99 USD, but Buds 3 Pro can now be purchased for about 170-190 USD.

🆚 Who should choose which Samsung earbuds?

Choose Galaxy Buds 4 Pro if:

You care about the best ANC in the Samsung ecosystem
You make a lot of phone calls
You have a Galaxy S26 (Super Clear Call)
You want head gestures and dual assistant (Gemini + Bixby)
You bought a Samsung phone in 2026 and want a complete set

Choose Galaxy Buds 3 Pro if:

You want to save 200-450 PLN
You don’t need the latest ANC
Sound is more important than call quality
You are looking for solid wireless earbuds at a good price
You have an older Samsung phone (Buds 3 Pro work great anyway)

Do you need a case for your earbuds? Check out accessories for Galaxy Buds 4 and 4 Pro or Galaxy Buds 3 and 3 Pro in our store.

❓ FAQ

Do Galaxy Buds 4 Pro work with iPhone?

Yes. Buds 4 Pro connect to iOS via Bluetooth, but you lose features exclusive to Samsung: head gestures, Super Clear Call, Gemini/Bixby, SmartThings Find, and automatic pairing.

Do Galaxy Buds 3 Pro support LDAC?

No. Neither the Buds 3 Pro nor the Buds 4 Pro support the LDAC codec. Both models use Samsung Seamless Codec (SSC UHQ) offering quality up to 24 bit/96 kHz, but only with Samsung smartphones.

Do Buds 4 Pro have better sound than Buds 3 Pro?

Yes, but the difference is not drastic. The Buds 4 Pro have better-controlled bass and clearer mid-tones thanks to a larger 11 mm driver. In blind tests, audiophiles will mainly notice the difference.

Is it worth buying Buds 3 Pro in 2026?

Yes. For 650-700 PLN, they are one of the best wireless headphones from Samsung with ANC, planar sound, and IP57. The price drop after the release of Buds 4 Pro makes them a great deal.

How much do Galaxy Buds 4 Pro cost in Poland?

The launch price of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro in Poland is 1099 PLN. They are available in three colors: Black, White, and Pink Gold.

Do Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have noise cancellation?

Yes. The Buds 4 Pro feature Adaptive ANC 2.0, which is next-generation active noise cancellation that monitors the environment in real-time and adjusts the attenuation to specific frequencies.

What is the difference between Galaxy Buds 4 Pro and regular Galaxy Buds 4?

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a dual-driver system (dynamic + planar), Adaptive ANC 2.0, Bluetooth 6.1, and VPU. Regular Galaxy Buds 4 have a single driver, basic ANC, and Bluetooth 5.4. The price difference is about 400 PLN.

Summary

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are an evolution, not a revolution, compared to Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. The most important upgrades are Adaptive ANC 2.0 (realistically better noise cancellation), Bluetooth 6.1, head gestures, dual AI assistant, and better battery in tests (6 h vs 4.5 h with ANC).

Is it worth the extra cost? At the full launch price (1099 vs 1029 PLN), the answer is: yes. At the current price of Buds 3 Pro (about 650-700 PLN), the decision is more difficult, because for almost half the price you get 80-90% of the experience.

Our verdict: Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are the best earbuds Samsung has ever made. But if your budget is limited, Galaxy Buds 3 Pro for 650-700 PLN is one of the best deals on the wireless earbuds market in 2026.

Check out Samsung headphone accessories in our store. And if you’re also planning a new phone, make sure to take care of its proper protection – check outcases for Galaxy S26 Ultra and glass for Galaxy S26 Ultra, which will protect the body and screen from damage.

2026-03-10

testowy

test like test what are you looking for

2026-03-10

Samsung Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56 – which one to choose?

Samsung Galaxy A57 vs A56 – the main difference is the more powerful Exynos 1680 processor with AMD Xclipse 550 GPU and Android 16 with One UI 8.5. The display (6.7″ Super AMOLED, 120 Hz), battery (5000 mAh), and cameras (50 Mpix) are identical in both models. The starting price of the Galaxy A57 is about 300 PLN higher.

The Galaxy A57 is the successor to one of the best-selling mid-range phones of 2025. The Galaxy A56 gained immense popularity due to its solid specifications, attractive price, and long update support. In this comparison of Samsung Galaxy A57 vs A56, we examine both models point by point so you can choose the one that best fits your needs.

Specifications of Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56 – comparison table

Before we get into the details, it’s worth looking at a side-by-side comparison of the Galaxy A57 and A56. The table below summarizes the Samsung Galaxy A57 specifications and key technical parameters of both models.

Parameter	Samsung Galaxy A57 5G	Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Display	6.7″ Super AMOLED, FHD+ (1080 × 2340), 120 Hz	6.7″ Super AMOLED, FHD+ (1080 × 2340), 120 Hz
Processor	Exynos 1680 (4 nm), GPU Xclipse 550	Exynos 1580 (4 nm)
RAM	8 GB	8 GB / 12 GB
Internal storage	128 / 256 GB	128 / 256 GB
Main camera	50 Mpix, OIS	50 Mpix, f/1.8, OIS, 1/1.56″
Ultra-wide camera	12 Mpix	12 Mpix, f/2.2, 123°
Macro camera	5 Mpix	5 Mpix, f/2.4
Front camera	12 Mpix, f/2.2	12 Mpix, f/2.2
Battery	5000 mAh	5000 mAh
Charging	45 W wired	45 W wired
System	Android 16, One UI 8.5	Android 15, One UI 7
Dimensions	161.5 × 76.9 × 6.9 mm	162.2 × 77.5 × 7.4 mm
Weight	192 g	198 g
Protection	IP67	IP67
Connectivity	5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 6.0	5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3
SIM	Dual SIM + eSIM	Dual SIM + eSIM
Price (Europe)	from approx. 539 EUR (~2,299 PLN)	from approx. 479 EUR (~1,999 PLN)

The full specifications of both models are available on the GSMArena website.

Tip: If you mainly care about the camera and RAM capacity, the Galaxy A56 with 12 GB RAM might be a better choice at a lower price.

Display of Galaxy A57 vs A56 – identical panel

Both the Galaxy A57 and A56 feature a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution (1080 × 2340 pixels) and a refresh rate of 120 Hz. The peak brightness reaches 1900 nits, ensuring good readability even in bright sunlight.

Both models are protected by Gorilla Glass Victus+, which effectively safeguards against scratches and minor drops. Samsung did not opt to introduce LTPO technology (dynamic refresh rate change from 1 to 120 Hz), which would help save battery. LTPO remains reserved for the flagship Galaxy S series.

In the comparison of Galaxy A57 and A56 in terms of display, there are practically no differences. If you liked the screen of the Galaxy A56, you will get exactly the same panel in the A57.

However, it is worth protecting this great display from day one. Check out durable tempered glass for Galaxy A57 available at homescreen.pl.

Performance of Galaxy A57 vs A56 – Exynos 1680 vs Exynos 1580

Here, the Galaxy A57 makes the biggest leap forward. The new Exynos 1680 processor (4 nm) with AMD Xclipse 550 GPU offers a noticeable increase in computing power compared to the Exynos 1580 in the Galaxy A56.

Benchmarks and real-world performance

The Exynos 1680 uses CPU cores in a 1+3+4 configuration and a 4 nm lithography, similar to its predecessor. The key change is the Xclipse 550 GPU based on AMD RDNA architecture, which offers ray tracing support. This feature has so far only been available in flagship Exynos 2×00 processors from the Galaxy S series.

What does this mean in practice?

Mobile games run smoother. Titles like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile should maintain more stable frames per second, and ray tracing will add realism in supported games.
Applications open faster, and multitasking (switching between several apps at once) is smoother.
Photo and video editing – the stronger GPU accelerates rendering and applying filters in apps like Adobe Lightroom or CapCut.
Energy efficiency – the new chip is more energy-efficient, which may result in longer battery life despite higher performance.

The Galaxy A56 with Exynos 1580 still performs well in everyday use. If you don’t play demanding mobile games and mainly use social media, browsers, and messaging apps, the performance difference will not be noticeable. For the average user, both processors offer more power than needed for daily tasks.

Camera of Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56 – evolution, not revolution

Both phones have a triple camera setup with a main 50 Mpix sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12 Mpix ultra-wide, and a 5 Mpix macro. The front camera in both cases is 12 Mpix with an f/2.2 aperture.

Samsung did not change the hardware configuration of the cameras, but the Galaxy A57 benefits from improved image processing thanks to the new processor. The Exynos 1680 supports AI algorithms for night photography, which enhance noise reduction and dynamic range in low light conditions.

Key differences in photography

Scenario	Galaxy A57	Galaxy A56
Daytime photos	Identical quality, same 50 Mpix sensor	Identical quality
Night mode	Faster processing, better noise reduction	Good, but slower processing
Video recording	Potentially better stabilization (stronger GPU)	Standard OIS stabilization
Selfies	No changes, 12 Mpix f/2.2	No changes, 12 Mpix f/2.2
Portrait with bokeh	Better background cutting thanks to AI	Good background cutting

In the comparison of Galaxy A57 vs A56, the camera differences will be subtle. The sensors remain the same, so photo quality in good lighting is practically identical. Improvements will mainly be visible in demanding conditions, such as night photography or dynamic video shots.

Battery and charging – no changes, but with better optimization

Both smartphones have a 5000 mAh battery and support 45 W fast charging (Super Fast Charge 2.0). The charger is not included in the box, so you will need to purchase it separately.

The Galaxy A56 charges from 0 to 65% in about 30 minutes, and a full charge takes about 68 minutes. The Galaxy A57 should achieve similar results, but thanks to the more energy-efficient Exynos 1680, the overall battery life on a single charge may be slightly longer.

Neither model supports wireless charging, which remains the domain of the flagship Galaxy S series. If you’re looking for a fast 45 W charger compatible with both models, check out network chargers with USB Power Delivery in our store. A solid USB-C cable supporting USB PD will also be useful.

Design and build quality

The Galaxy A57 is slimmer and lighter than its predecessor:

	Galaxy A57	Galaxy A56
Thickness	6.9 mm	7.4 mm
Weight	192 g	198 g
Dimensions	161.5 × 76.9 mm	162.2 × 77.5 mm

The difference of 0.5 mm in thickness and 6 g in weight may not look impressive on paper, but it is noticeable in hand. The Galaxy A57 feels more comfortable and appears more refined.

Both models have a flat frame, an IP67 rating (dust and water resistance up to 1 m for 30 minutes), and Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front. The colors of the Galaxy A57 are gray, light blue, lilac, and navy blue, with a slightly different palette than the A56 (graphite, light gray, olive, pink).

Choose a case that highlights the slim design of the new model. At homescreen.pl, you will find cases for Galaxy A57 from Ringke, 3MK, Tech-Protect, and Bizon, with over 50 models starting from 29 PLN.

System and updates – Android 16 vs Android 15

The Galaxy A57 debuts with Android 16 and One UI 8.5, while the Galaxy A56 launched with Android 15 and One UI 7. This is an important difference, as the newer version of the system means:

Longer support for updates from the moment of release
New AI features integrated with One UI 8.5, including improved Galaxy AI with context recognition
Circle to Search 2.0 – enhanced visual search by circling an object on the screen
Improved notifications and interface customization
Bluetooth 6.0 (vs Bluetooth 5.3 in A56), providing better connection stability with wireless headphones

The Galaxy A56 will receive an update to Android 16, but it may take a few months from the release of the new system. Samsung provides 4 years of system updates and 5 years of security patches for both models, which according to Samsung’s official update policy is one of the longest support cycles in the mid-range market.

Galaxy A57 vs A56 – price and value for money

This is a key question for many buyers. The launch price of the Galaxy A57 in Poland starts at around 2,299 PLN for the 8/128 GB version, while the Galaxy A56 in the same configuration cost around 1,999 PLN at launch. This is a difference of about 300 PLN.

Variant	Galaxy A57 (launch price)	Galaxy A56 (current price)
8/128 GB	approx. 2,299 PLN	approx. 1,599-1,799 PLN
8/256 GB	approx. 2,599 PLN	approx. 1,799-1,999 PLN

The Galaxy A56, which has been on the market for over a year, can be purchased at a significantly lower price than at launch. This makes the value for money of the Galaxy A56 really hard to beat. With the saved 500-700 PLN, you can buy a complete set of protective accessories: a case, tempered glass, and a fast charger.

Which one to choose? Recommendations based on needs

Choose the Samsung Galaxy A57 if:
– You care about the latest processor and the highest performance in mobile gaming
– You want Android 16 and One UI 8.5 from day one
– You prefer a slimmer and lighter design
– You don’t mind paying a higher price for the latest solutions

Stick with the Samsung Galaxy A56 if:
– You are looking for great value for money
– You don’t need the latest processor for everyday use
– You want to save 300-500 PLN and spend it on accessories
– You prefer a model that has been proven by users, with Samsung Galaxy A56 reviews confirming its reliability (rating 4.6/5)

Our recommendation: For most users, the Galaxy A56 at its current reduced price is the better choice. The extra cost for the Galaxy A57 makes sense mainly for mobile gamers and those who always want the latest technology.

Accessories – protection for your new smartphone

Whether you choose the Galaxy A57 or the Galaxy A56, it’s worth getting protective accessories right away. Both models have a large 6.7″ display that should be protected with tempered glass from day one of use.

For Samsung Galaxy A57, you will find at homescreen.pl:
– Protective cases from Ringke, 3MK, Tech-Protect, and Bizon (starting from 29 PLN)
– Tempered glass Bizon Glass Clear Duo and Ringke Easy Slide (starting from 35 PLN)
– Camera glasses to protect the camera module
– Protective sets Bizon MatteO Pack and Case Clear Pack (case + glass at an attractive price)

Check out the full offer: accessories for Samsung Galaxy A57

For Samsung Galaxy A56, available are:
– Recycled cases Bizon Case ReLeaf in various colors
– Tempered glass 3MK HardGlass Max with full coverage
– Privacy glass Bizon Glass Mule Shadow protecting against peeping
– Matte films Bizon Glass Film Sun reducing glare and fingerprints

Check out the full offer: films, glasses, and cases for Galaxy A56

Don’t forget about a power bank for longer trips; the 5000 mAh battery is substantial, but extra energy is always useful.

Summary

In the comparison of Samsung Galaxy A57 vs A56, it is clear that the new model is a solid, albeit evolutionary update. The main changes are the more powerful Exynos 1680 processor with AMD Xclipse 550 GPU and ray tracing, a slimmer body (6.9 vs 7.4 mm), a newer Android 16 system with One UI 8.5, and Bluetooth 6.0. The display, battery, camera, and charging remain practically unchanged.

With a price difference of about 300-700 PLN (considering the reduced price of the Galaxy A56 after a year on the market), the choice depends on your priorities. If performance and the latest system are your priorities, go for the A57. If value for money matters, in the comparison of Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56, the older model wins as one of the best mid-range phones on the market.

FAQ

What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A57 and Galaxy A56?
The main differences are the newer Exynos 1680 processor (vs Exynos 1580), Android 16 with One UI 8.5 (vs Android 15), Bluetooth 6.0 (vs 5.3), and a slimmer and lighter design (6.9 vs 7.4 mm thick). The display, battery, charging, and cameras remain the same.

Is it worth paying extra for the Galaxy A57?
The extra cost of about 300-500 PLN makes sense if you care about better gaming performance (Xclipse 550 GPU with ray tracing) or want the latest system from day one. For everyday use, the Galaxy A56 is still sufficient.

What processor does the Samsung Galaxy A57 have?
The Samsung Galaxy A57 5G is equipped with the Exynos 1680 processor made in 4 nm technology with AMD Xclipse 550 GPU. This chip is noticeably more powerful than the Exynos 1580 in the Galaxy A56, especially in terms of graphics.

How much does the Samsung Galaxy A57 cost? Price in Poland
The starting price of the Galaxy A57 is around 2,299 PLN for the 8/128 GB version and around 2,599 PLN for the 8/256 GB version. The Galaxy A56 in the same configuration can be purchased from around 1,599 PLN after discounts.

Does the Galaxy A57 have a better camera than the A56?
Both models have identical camera configurations: 50 Mpix (main) + 12 Mpix (ultra-wide) + 5 Mpix (macro) + 12 Mpix (selfie). The Galaxy A57 may offer slightly better night photography due to the improved ISP in the Exynos 1680 processor.

Do Galaxy A56 cases fit the Galaxy A57?
No, the Galaxy A57 has different dimensions than the Galaxy A56 (161.5 × 76.9 × 6.9 mm vs 162.2 × 77.5 × 7.4 mm), so the cases are not compatible. Check out dedicated cases for Galaxy A57 at homescreen.pl.

When is the Samsung Galaxy A57 release date?
The Samsung Galaxy A57 5G debuts in March 2026. The phone is already available for pre-order with most Polish operators and in electronics stores.

2026-03-10

iPhone 15 vs iPhone 17 – a two-year difference in practice

Switching from the iPhone 15 to the iPhone 17 provides a clearly noticeable leap in quality. The new model finally has a 120 Hz ProMotion display in all versions, larger and brighter screens, much better battery life, and faster charging.

The cameras are more versatile – in every model, we find dual or triple 48 MP modules, and the front camera has gained Center Stage functionality and 4K recording from both sides simultaneously.

Additionally, the iPhone 17 is more powerful, heats up less, and introduces local AI features, such as live conversation translation and on-screen content recognition.

For owners of the iPhone 15 or 15 Plus, the difference is huge – primarily a smoother display and better battery. For users of the 15 Pro/Pro Max, it mainly means a better telephoto lens, a larger screen, and longer battery life.

📊 iPhone 15 vs iPhone 17 – Comparison Table

Feature	iPhone 15 (2023)	iPhone 17 (2025)
Processor & RAM	A16 Bionic (15/15 Plus), A17 Pro (15 Pro/Max) • 6-core CPU, 5-core GPU • 6–8 GB RAM	A19 (17/Air), A19 Pro (17 Pro/Max) • +40% faster CPU • GPU with AI accelerators • 8 GB RAM (17) • 12 GB RAM (Air/Pro/Max)
Performance	~2500 points single-core (A16) • Top performance in 2023	~3800 points single-core (A19 Pro) • Multi-core ~9700 points • GPU +35% vs A18 Pro
Display	6.1″ / 6.7″ OLED 60 Hz (ProMotion only in Pro) • 2000 nits (peak) • AoD only in Pro	6.3″ / 6.5″ / 6.9″ OLED LTPO 120 Hz (everywhere) • 3000 nits (record) • AoD in every model
Rear Cameras	15/Plus: 48 + 12 MP • no tele (2× crop) 15 Pro: 48 + 12 + 12 MP (tele 3×) 15 Pro Max: tele 5× (periscope)	17: 48 + 48 MP (ultra-wide also 48) Air: single 48 MP 17 Pro/Max: 48 + 48 + 48 MP • tele 4× 100 mm (crop to ~8× “optical quality”)
Front Camera	12 MP • static frame	18 MP Center Stage • auto-framing • 4K HDR recording + Dual Capture
Video	4K@60 HDR • Cinematic 4K@30 (Pro) • ProRes 4K@30 (Pro) • Spatial Video (announced for 15 Pro)	4K@120 (slow-mo) • ProRes 4K@60 RAW (Pro) • Genlock (multi-cam sync) • Spatial Video (available for the entire series)
Battery	15: up to 20 h • 15 Plus: 26 h • 15 Pro: 23 h • 15 Pro Max: 29 h	17: 30 h • 17 Air: 27 h • 17 Pro: 33 h • 17 Pro Max: 39 h (1.5–2 days of use)
Charging	USB-C 2.0 (15) • USB-C 3 (Pro) • 50% in 30 min (20W) • MagSafe 15W	USB-C 3 in Air/Pro (DisplayPort) • 50% in 20 min (40W charger) • MagSafe/Qi2 25W • reverse charging for accessories
Design & Materials	Aluminum frame (15) or titanium (Pro) • Dynamic Island • mute button (Pro: Action Button)	Aluminum unibody (better cooling) • Ceramic Shield 2 (3× more resistant) • Action Button in all models • new ultra-thin Air model (5.6 mm)
Connectivity	5G, Wi-Fi 6 (Pro: 6E), BT 5.3, UWB gen. 2	5G, Wi-Fi 7, BT 6 (LE Audio), UWB gen. 3, Thread (Smart Home), chip N1 (faster AirDrop/Hotspot)
Software	iOS 17 • StandBy, NameDrop, SOS satellite	iOS 26 • Apple Intelligence (AI offline), Live Translation, Visual Intelligence, Memory Integrity Enforcement
Variants and Prices	15 / 15 Plus / 15 Pro / 15 Pro Max • from 128 GB • 15 from 4699 PLN	17 / 17 Air / 17 Pro / 17 Pro Max • starting from 256 GB • 17 from 3999 PLN • new colors (lavender, cosmic orange)

Design and Ergonomics

iPhone 17 vs iPhone 15 – what has changed in appearance and construction?

Switching from the iPhone 15 to the 17 starts with the first impression. The phone looks and feels different – more modern and more “fitted” to the hand.

Apple has narrowed the bezels by about 15%, so even the iPhone 17 Pro Max with a 6.9″ screen has almost the same dimensions as the 15 Pro Max with a 6.7″ screen. This means:

Larger screen in the same body – perfect for watching videos and working on a split screen.
More immersive experiences – fewer visible bezels mean more enjoyment from gaming and watching movies.
More comfortable one-handed operation – despite the larger display, you don’t feel that the phone is less handy.

The Pro versions received a new unibody aluminum casing, which not only looks better than titanium in the 15 Pro, but also dissipates heat better.
In practice, this means less heating of the phone when recording video or during long gaming sessions.

The back is covered with matte glass with a new texture – less slippery and less prone to fingerprints.
New colors (lavender, cosmic orange) add freshness to the line and distinguish the phone from previous generations.

💡 Everyday difference: the iPhone 17 fits better in the hand, heats up less, and the Air model is record-thin and lightweight – ideal for those who previously chose the 15 Plus but would like something more portable.

Cameras and Video

The biggest leap in photo and video quality in years

This is where the generational leap is truly visible.
In the iPhone 15 and 15 Plus, we had a main 48 MP camera and a 12 MP ultra-wide. The telephoto lens was missing, and zoom was done digitally.

The iPhone 17 introduces:

two 48 MP cameras already in the base model – main and ultra-wide,
full set of 48+48+48 MP in Pro and Pro Max – including a 4× 100 mm telephoto lens, with the ability to crop up to 8× without losing quality.

The effect in practice:

ultra-wide photos are sharper and more detailed,
zoom is suitable for photographing concerts, architecture, and distant objects,
night mode is faster and provides brighter shots than in the 15.

The front camera now has 18 MP and Center Stage functionality – the frame follows you during video calls, which was previously reserved for the iPad.

Video:

from 4K/60 in 15 you switch to 4K/120 in Dolby Vision,
you can record in ProRes RAW 4K/60,
you have the ability to synchronize multiple iPhones (Genlock) – a feature useful for video creators.

💡 Everyday difference: the 15 Pro offered ProRes, but without RAW and without 4K/120. The 17 Pro is practically a miniature film camera that can replace professional equipment in many scenarios.

Display

finally 120 Hz for everyone

This is the biggest “wow effect” when switching from the iPhone 15 or 15 Plus.
In the previous generation, only the Pro versions had ProMotion 120 Hz and Always-On Display.
Now:

every iPhone 17 has an LTPO 1–120 Hz display,
Always-On Display is available for everyone,
brightness has increased to 3000 nits – 50% more than in the 15.

💡 Everyday difference: scrolling, animations, and games are ultra-smooth even in the base model. The display is readable in full sunlight, making it more convenient to use the phone outdoors than ever before.

🔋 Battery and Charging – realistically longer

Apple has increased the cells and optimized energy consumption thanks to the A19 and LTPO panels.
The effect:

iPhone 17 Pro Max: up to 39 h of video playback (15 Pro Max – 29 h),
iPhone 17 Pro: up to 33 h,
iPhone 17 Air: about 27 h despite the thinnest construction.

Charging:

50% in 20 minutes using a 40 W charger,
MagSafe/Qi2 up to 25 W – finally fast wireless charging,
reverse charging for AirPods and Apple Watch.

💡 Everyday difference: the iPhone 15 needed to be charged almost daily. The iPhone 17 lasts up to 2 days without a charger under normal use.

⚡ Performance and Cooling – power without throttling

The iPhone 15 used A16 (15/Plus) or A17 Pro (Pro/Max).
In the 17, the entire line received A19/A19 Pro with AI accelerators.
In practice:

apps open faster,
video export is shorter by 20–30%,
in AAA games, the phone maintains a stable framerate longer.

Thanks to the unibody casing and vapor chamber, the iPhone 17 Pro heats up less and does not throttle as quickly as the 15 Pro.

🌐 System and Software – iOS 26 and Apple Intelligence

The iPhone 15 launched with iOS 17, which performed most AI functions in the cloud.
The iPhone 17 introduces:

Apple Intelligence offline – faster and more private operation,
Live Translation – real-time conversation translation,
Visual Intelligence – recognizes objects and text on the screen with one touch,
Faster Siri, which understands context and operates locally.

💡 Everyday difference: less waiting and less dependence on the internet. The phone becomes more of a “smart assistant” than in the 15.

📶 Connectivity – faster and more stable

The iPhone 15 offered Wi-Fi 6/6E and Bluetooth 5.3.
The iPhone 17 transitions to:

Wi-Fi 7 – more stable connection and lower latency,
Bluetooth 6 with LE Audio – better sound quality and less lag in games,
UWB gen. 3 – more accurate locating of AirTags and digital keys,
Thread – faster smart home automation.

💡 Everyday difference: AirDrop is faster, Hotspot works more stably, and the smart home reacts instantly.

2025-09-20