Category: Uncategorized

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose?

The dilemma of POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max is one of the hottest smartphone comparisons of 2026. Both models debuted in March and immediately sparked huge interest — they offer AMOLED displays with a brightness of 3,500 nits, IP68/IP69K protection, and 100 W charging. The key difference? Processor, battery, and camera. POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, while POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN. Below you will find a detailed comparison to help you choose the right model.

Technical specifications — POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max

Before we move on to a detailed analysis, it’s worth looking at the full specifications of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in one place. The table below shows the key differences between both models.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Display	6.59″ AMOLED, 1.5K	6.83″ AMOLED, 1.5K
Brightness	3,500 nits (peak)	3,500 nits (peak)
Refresh Rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Processor	MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra (4 nm)	MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (3 nm)
AnTuTu v11	2,283,558	3,085,998
RAM / Storage	8/256 GB or 12/512 GB	12/256 GB or 12/512 GB
Main Camera	50 MP, Sony IMX882, OIS	50 MP, Light Fusion 600, OIS
Battery	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
Operating System	Android 16, HyperOS 3	Android 16, HyperOS 3
Resistance	IP68 / IP69K	IP68 / IP69K
Weight	201.5 g	218 g
Fingerprint Reader	Optical (under display)	Ultrasonic (under display)
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
eSIM	No	Yes
Price from	1,399 PLN	1,799 PLN

Display — bigger doesn’t always mean better

Both the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max feature 1.5K AMOLED displays with a 120 Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 3,500 nits. They support Dolby Vision and HDR10+, resulting in excellent color reproduction while watching movies.

The main difference is size — the POCO X8 Pro has a 6.59-inch display, while the POCO X8 Pro Max offers 6.83 inches. Both models are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i and have TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

Tip: If you value compactness and one-handed use, the POCO X8 Pro will be more comfortable. For fans of large displays — the X8 Pro Max with its 6.83-inch panel is a better choice for movies and games.

The touch sampling rate is 480 Hz (Game Turbo) in both models, and PWM dimming operates at 3,840 Hz — this is important for those sensitive to screen flicker.

POCO X8 Pro — AMOLED display 6.59 inches with 3500 nits brightness

Processor and performance — this is where the POCO X8 Pro Max excels

This is one of the biggest differences when comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra in a 4-nanometer manufacturing process, while the Pro Max received the flagship Dimensity 9500s made in a 3 nm process.

The performance difference is clear — the POCO X8 Pro score in AnTuTu v11 is 2,283,558 points, while the POCO X8 Pro Max reaches 3,085,998 in AnTuTu:

Test	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max	Difference
AnTuTu v11	2,283,558	3,085,998	+35%
Manufacturing process	4 nm (TSMC)	3 nm	Newer
GPU	Mali-G720 MC8	Immortalis-G925 MC12	Higher class

The Dimensity 9500s in the POCO X8 Pro Max is a flagship segment chip — the same processor can be found in phones costing over 3,000 PLN. The Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU provides smooth gameplay even in the most demanding mobile games, such as Genshin Impact or Honkai: Star Rail at the highest settings.

POCO X8 Pro with Dimensity 8500-Ultra also performs very well in everyday use — multitasking, social media, and gaming at medium settings are not a problem. However, in benchmarks and intensive games, the 35% difference in favor of the Max model is noticeable.

Both smartphones feature the POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system with a surface area of 5,300 mm², which effectively dissipates heat during longer gaming sessions.

It is worth mentioning that both models support 5G network (SA/NSA) — this is the standard in 2026, but still an important parameter when choosing a new smartphone. The RAM in both cases is LPDDR5X, and the internal storage is UFS 4.1 — the fastest available standards in the mid-premium segment.

Camera — Light Fusion 600 vs Sony IMX882

Both models have a main camera of 50 MP with optical image stabilization (OIS), but the sensors used differ significantly.

POCO X8 Pro uses the Sony IMX882 — a proven sensor with a size of 1/1.95 inches and 0.8 μm pixels. It is a solid sensor that performs well in daylight and well-lit scenes.

POCO X8 Pro Max received the newer Light Fusion 600 with 1.6 μm pixels — twice as large as those in the X8 Pro. The Dual Native ISO Fusion technology improves dynamic range and significantly enhances photo quality in low light. In practice, this means less noise in night photos and better details in shadows.

The remaining elements of the camera set are identical:
– Ultra-wide angle — 8 MP, f/2.2
– Front — 20 MP, f/2.2
– Video recording — 4K at 30/60 fps, slow motion 960 fps

Tip: If you often take photos in the evening or in poorly lit interiors, the POCO X8 Pro Max with the Light Fusion 600 sensor will be a noticeably better choice.

Battery and charging — 6,500 vs 8,500 mAh

This is another category where the POCO X8 Pro Max clearly dominates. The 8,500 mAh battery (silicon-carbon technology) is 30% more than the 6,500 mAh in the Pro model.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Capacity	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Wired charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
Reverse charging	27 W	27 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Battery life	≥80% after 1,600 cycles	≥80% after 1,600 cycles

In practice, the POCO X8 Pro Max easily lasts two full days of moderate use, and with light usage, even three days. The POCO X8 Pro comfortably provides a full day even with intensive use.

Both models charge at a power of 100 W — the POCO X8 Pro Max recovers 50% of energy in about 24 minutes, and a full charge takes just over 50 minutes. Neither model supports wireless charging.

If you are looking for a fast wall charger that supports 100 W, it’s worth choosing a model with USB Power Delivery (fast charging standard) or a dedicated Xiaomi charger. A compact power bank with the appropriate output power will also be useful for daily charging on the go.

Construction and design — aluminum, glass, and IP69K

Both smartphones have aluminum frames, Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the front, and an IP68/IP69K certification — they can withstand immersion in water as well as a stream of hot water under pressure. This is rare in this price range. Despite their durability, it’s worth protecting the display — screen protectors will provide additional protection against scratches in everyday use.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Dimensions	157.5 × 75.2 × 8.4 mm	162.9 × 77.9 × 8.2 mm
Weight	201.5 g	218 g
Back cover	Glass	Fiberglass
SIM	Dual nano-SIM	Dual nano-SIM + eSIM
RGB backlight	8 colors	8 colors
Colors	Black, White, Mint Green	Black, White, Blue

POCO X8 Pro is lighter by 16.5 g and slightly narrower — it fits better in the hand and fits into narrower pockets. The Max model is slimmer (8.2 vs 8.4 mm), but larger and heavier due to the bigger battery and display.

It’s worth mentioning that the POCO X8 Pro is also available in a limited Iron Man edition (12/512 GB) for 1,749 PLN on promotion — this is a variant for Marvel fans.

Regardless of the chosen model, it’s good to invest in a suitable case for the POCO smartphone that will protect the aluminum frame and glass or fiberglass back from mechanical damage.

POCO X8 Pro — design and construction with an aluminum frame

Connectivity — Wi-Fi 7 and eSIM only in the Max model

In terms of connectivity, the POCO X8 Pro Max offers several significant improvements:

Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) instead of Wi-Fi 6 — faster transfer and lower latency
eSIM — a convenient solution while traveling, without the need to swap physical SIM cards
Bluetooth 5.4 with Auracast — wireless audio sharing to multiple headphones simultaneously
Symmetrical stereo speakers — better sound than the standard stereo speakers in the X8 Pro

POCO X8 Pro 5G and POCO X8 Pro Max 5G support both SA and NSA modes. Other common connectivity features include NFC, infrared port (IR blaster), USB-C 2.0, GPS L1+L5, and Dolby Atmos with Hi-Res Audio (24-bit/192 kHz). Neither model has a 3.5 mm headphone jack — if you prefer wireless audio, check out Bluetooth headphones compatible with both smartphones.

Security and Software

Both smartphones run on Android 16 with HyperOS 3 and will receive 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. They also have access to Google Gemini, Circle to Search, and AI tools (AI Writing, AI Speech).

The key difference concerns the fingerprint reader:

POCO X8 Pro — optical reader under the screen
POCO X8 Pro Max — ultrasonic reader under the screen

The ultrasonic reader works faster, is more precise, and recognizes the finger even when wet — this is a clear advantage of the Max model.

POCO X8 Pro Max also offers the Xiaomi Offline Communication feature with a range of up to 500 m — it allows communication with other Xiaomi devices without access to the internet or cellular network.

Price of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in Poland

How much do these smartphones cost? The price of POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, and the price of POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN in the promotional launch (until March 31, 2026):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1,399 PLN (only mi.com)	—
12/256 GB	—	1,799 PLN (only mi.com)
12/512 GB	1,599 PLN	1,999 PLN
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1,749 PLN	—

Regular prices (after promotion):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1,699 zł	—
12/256 GB	—	2,099 zł
12/512 GB	1,899 zł	2,299 zł
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1,999 zł	—

The difference of 400 zł between comparable variants (12/512 GB) is a reasonable surcharge for the flagship processor, larger battery, better camera, and Wi-Fi 7. You can find current prices and availability on the official POCO website.

Gaming performance — how do they perform in practice?

Simply comparing AnTuTu scores does not provide the full picture. In everyday use, both smartphones perform excellently — apps open instantly, multitasking works smoothly, and scrolling through the interface is fluid at 120 Hz.

The difference becomes noticeable in demanding mobile games. The POCO X8 Pro Max with the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU maintains a stable 60 fps in Genshin Impact at the highest graphics settings, while the POCO X8 Pro with the Mali-G720 MC8 requires lowering some options to medium to maintain fluidity. In less demanding titles — PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, or Honkai: Star Rail — both models run smoothly at high settings.

The POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system works effectively in both cases. After a 30-minute session of Genshin Impact, the casing temperatures remain within a comfortable range. The POCO X8 Pro Max has a slight advantage here due to its larger casing, which dissipates heat better.

For casual gamers, the POCO X8 Pro will be more than sufficient. However, if you regularly play the most demanding titles and care about maximum graphic settings, the Dimensity 9500s in the Max model is a safer choice for the years to come.

POCO X8 Pro Max vs competition — how does it compare to rivals?

It is worth looking at both POCO models in the context of the market. In the price range of 1,400–2,300 PLN, the competition is significant:

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (~1,699 PLN) — better Samsung ecosystem, longer support (7 years of updates), but noticeably weaker Exynos 1580 processor and smaller 5,000 mAh battery. The POCO X8 Pro offers more performance for a similar price.
Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (~1,599 PLN) — a close relative from the Xiaomi family. Similar specifications to the POCO X8 Pro, but slightly weaker Dimensity 8400-Ultra and smaller 6,200 mAh battery. POCO stands out with an IP69K certification.
Nothing Phone (3a) (~1,799 PLN) — distinguished by its Glyph lighting design, pure Android, but weaker processor and smaller battery. A choice for those who prioritize aesthetics.
Motorola Edge 60 (~1,899 PLN) — a competitor with wireless charging, which is lacking in POCO. However, it falls short in performance compared to the POCO X8 Pro Max.

POCO X8 Pro Max priced at 1,999 PLN (12/512 GB) offers performance comparable to smartphones costing over 3,000 PLN — Samsung Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, or Xiaomi 15. This is its biggest competitive advantage.

Summary of differences — who wins in each category?

Category	Winner	Why?
Display	POCO X8 Pro Max	Larger 6.83″ panel
Performance	POCO X8 Pro Max	Dimensity 9500s, +35% in AnTuTu
Camera	POCO X8 Pro Max	Light Fusion 600, better night photos
Battery	POCO X8 Pro Max	8,500 vs 6,500 mAh
Compactness	POCO X8 Pro	Lighter (201.5 g), narrower
Price	POCO X8 Pro	From 1,399 PLN
Connectivity	POCO X8 Pro Max	Wi-Fi 7, eSIM, Auracast
Biometrics	POCO X8 Pro Max	Ultrasonic reader

POCO X8 Pro Max wins in six out of eight categories — but POCO X8 Pro stands its ground with its price and compact dimensions.

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

The choice between POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max depends on your priorities and budget.

Choose POCO X8 Pro if:
– You are looking for the best value for money under 1,700 PLN
– You prefer a compact and lighter smartphone (201.5 g vs 218 g)
– You don’t need flagship performance — Dimensity 8500-Ultra is more than enough for everyday tasks
– You are interested in the limited Iron Man edition

Choose POCO X8 Pro Max if:
– You want a flagship Dimensity 9500s processor with performance comparable to phones costing over 3,000 PLN
– You care about the longest battery life — 8,500 mAh lasts 2–3 days without charging
– You take a lot of photos in low light — Light Fusion 600 makes a noticeable difference
– You need eSIM or Wi-Fi 7
– You value a faster and more accurate ultrasonic fingerprint reader

Our verdict: For an additional 400 PLN, POCO X8 Pro Max offers significantly more — a flagship processor, a huge battery, and a better camera. It is one of the best smartphones in terms of price to performance ratio in 2026. However, if compactness and a lower price are priorities, POCO X8 Pro remains an excellent choice.

In summary, comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — both smartphones offer excellent value, but the Max model targets users who want flagship performance without the flagship price.

Are you looking for accessories for your new POCO smartphone? Check out cases and tempered glass for POCO phones at Home Screen — you’ll find protection tailored to your model.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — what are the differences?

The main differences are the processor (Dimensity 8500-Ultra vs flagship Dimensity 9500s), battery (6,500 vs 8,500 mAh), camera sensor (Sony IMX882 vs Light Fusion 600 with larger pixels), fingerprint reader (optical vs ultrasonic), and connectivity (Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7, no eSIM vs eSIM).

Is the POCO X8 Pro Max worth the extra 400 PLN?

Yes — for an additional 400 PLN, you get a flagship processor with 35% higher performance, a battery that is 2,000 mAh larger, a better camera for night photos, Wi-Fi 7, and eSIM. It’s one of the better upgrades on the smartphone market.

What is the price of the POCO X8 Pro in Poland?

The POCO X8 Pro costs from 1,399 PLN (8/256 GB, promotional price) to 1,899 PLN (12/512 GB, regular price). There is also a limited Iron Man edition available for 1,749–1,999 PLN.

Are the POCO X8 Pro and X8 Pro Max waterproof?

Yes — both models have an IP68 and IP69K certification, which means they are resistant to immersion in water (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes) and to a stream of hot water under pressure.

How long does the battery last in the POCO X8 Pro Max?

The 8,500 mAh battery in the POCO X8 Pro Max lasts for 2–3 days of moderate use. The 100 W HyperCharge charging allows you to regain 50% of the energy in about 24 minutes.

Does the POCO X8 Pro have eSIM?

No — eSIM is only available in the POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model supports only two physical nano-SIM cards.

2026-03-19

AirPods Max 2 — premiere, price, and specifications of the new Apple headphones

AirPods Max 2 are the new over-ear headphones from Apple with the H2 chip, offering 1.5x better active noise cancellation than the previous generation. The price in Poland is 2499 zł, pre-orders start on March 25, 2026, and deliveries will begin in early April.

Four years of waiting and the same price — sounds like good news. But has Apple changed enough to justify replacing the old Max? We check what exactly you get for that 2499 zł.

Technical specifications of AirPods Max 2

Parameter	AirPods Max (1st gen)	AirPods Max 2
Chip	Apple H1	Apple H2
Bluetooth	5.0	5.3
ANC	Standard	1.5x better
Lossless audio	—	24-bit / 48 kHz (USB-C)
Transparency mode	Yes	Enhanced
Adaptive Audio	—	✅
Conversation detection	—	✅
Voice isolation	—	✅
Live translation	—	✅
Personalized volume	—	✅
Battery life	up to 20 h	up to 20 h
Connection	Lightning / USB-C	USB-C
Weight	384.8 g	386.2 g
Colors	5	5 (new palette)
Price in Poland	2499 zł (USB-C)	2499 zł

H2 Chip — the heart of the new AirPods Max 2

The biggest change is hidden under the aluminum casing. The new Apple AirPods Max use the H2 chip (the same one that debuted in AirPods Pro 2), and the improvements concern three key areas:

Better noise cancellation — new computational algorithms analyze the surrounding sound up to 48,000 times per second, resulting in 1.5x more effective ANC than in the first generation
Lower wireless latency — Bluetooth 5.3 reduces audio lag, which gamers and movie lovers will appreciate
Lossless audio support — via USB-C cable, you can listen to music in 24-bit / 48 kHz quality (Apple Lossless)

The H2 chip also supports personalized spatial audio with dynamic head tracking — the effect is closest to what you know from the cinema. The result? On paper, it’s the same amplifier with a wide dynamic range, but in practice, the bass sounds fuller, and individual instruments are easier to extract from the mix. The difference is most noticeable in orchestral music and well-produced recordings on Apple Music — with a pop playlist, you might not notice it.

You can find the full range of Apple over-ear headphones at homescreen.pl.

New smart features

The new Apple AirPods Max take on features known from AirPods Pro 3, which were previously unavailable in the over-ear version.

Adaptive Audio is a feature that makes you stop thinking about headphone modes. Are you entering a café? The headphones automatically let in the voices around you. Are you getting on a train? ANC kicks in at full power. Conversation Awareness works similarly — when you start speaking, the music fades out, and the voice of your conversation partner is amplified. You don’t have to take off your headphones to order a coffee.

Voice Isolation does the same thing, but in the opposite direction — during a phone call, your conversation partner hears only you, even if you are calling from a busy street. All three features work without any configuration.

Live Translation requires an iPhone with iOS 26 and Apple Intelligence — so for now, it only works on iPhone 16 and newer. The headphones translate the conversation in real time, displaying subtitles on the phone screen. It sounds futuristic, but in practice, it’s more of a help for simple conversations than a substitute for a translator. A dozen languages are supported, including Polish.

Personalized Volume learns your preferences and automatically adjusts the volume level to the environment — Marek, who commutes by subway to work every day and then sits in an open space, will appreciate this feature the most.

Price of AirPods Max 2 in Poland

Apple AirPods Max 2 cost in Poland 2499 zł — exactly the same as the USB-C version of the original AirPods Max. This is an amount that clearly positions them in the premium segment.

For comparison:

Model	Price in Poland	Type
AirPods 4	approx. 549 zł	In-ear, open
AirPods Pro 3	approx. 1099 zł	In-ear, ANC
AirPods Max 2	2499 zł	Over-ear, ANC
Sony WH-1000XM5	approx. 1299 zł	Over-ear, ANC
Bose QuietComfort Ultra	approx. 1699 zł	Over-ear, ANC

2499 zł for wireless headphones is a lot — almost twice as much as the Sony WH-1000XM5, which regularly compete neck and neck with the Max in blind sound tests. What are you paying extra for? Primarily for integration with the Apple ecosystem: automatic switching between iPhone, iPad, and Mac works so smoothly that after a week you’ll forget you ever manually changed devices. Features like live translation are an additional argument, but — let’s be honest — for most users, it’s a curiosity, not a reason to buy.

Design and materials — what has changed?

Short answer: almost nothing. If you placed AirPods Max 1 vs 2 side by side, the only visible difference would be the color. Apple did not change the shape, weight (386 g — they are still among the heaviest popular over-ear headphones), or construction:

Aluminum ear cups with independent rotation provide a perfect fit
Mesh headband evenly distributes pressure on the top of the head
Memory foam ear cushions — comfortable even during long hours of wear
Digital Crown is used to adjust volume and control playback
Listening mode button — a new element replacing the noise control button

However, the color palette is new. Instead of Space Gray, Silver, Sky Blue, Pink, and Green, we get: Midnight, Moonlight, Blue, Purple, and Orange. The orange variant is particularly bold, standing out against Apple’s typically muted offerings.

AirPods Max 2 vs AirPods Max — is the upgrade worth it?

If you have the original AirPods Max with the H1 chip, upgrading to the second generation makes sense in three cases:

You care about better ANC — 1.5x more effective noise cancellation is a noticeable difference, especially in public transport and open spaces
You want Adaptive Audio and Conversation Awareness — smart features that automate mode switching are a real convenience in everyday use
You need live translation — if you travel or work in an international environment, Live Translation can be a game-changer

However, if your current AirPods Max are working flawlessly and you mainly listen to music at home — don’t replace them. The sound quality has improved, but not enough for you to notice a difference during everyday listening on Spotify. It’s better to wait for the third generation.

Advice: If you have AirPods Max with Lightning, the upgrade makes additional sense — you gain USB-C, which simplifies the cable setup and adds lossless audio.

For everyday charging, any USB-C charger will suffice — and you can find the full range of all AirPods models and headphones at homescreen.pl.

Ecology — Apple moves forward

Apple emphasizes sustainability in AirPods Max 2:

100% recycled rare earth metals in magnets
100% recycled polyester in ear cushions
100% recycled gold and tin in circuit boards
Packaging made entirely from paper from natural fibers

This is a continuation of the Apple Carbon Neutral 2030 strategy, which encompasses more and more product categories. You can find the full specifications of AirPods Max 2 on the official Apple website.

Summary — who are the AirPods Max 2 for?

AirPods Max 2 is an evolution, not a revolution. Apple has put a new chip into an old case, and you get significantly better ANC, smart features from AirPods Pro 3, and lossless audio via USB-C. But you don’t get a new design, longer battery life, or a lower price. These are the best over-ear headphones from Apple that you can buy today.

Worth buying if:
– You use multiple Apple devices and value seamless integration
– You are looking for top-notch ANC for working in a noisy environment
– You want live translation features or Adaptive Audio

Consider alternatives if:
– You don’t need the Apple ecosystem — Sony WH-1000XM5 or Bose QC Ultra offer comparable ANC at a lower price. Compare over-ear headphones with ANC at homescreen.pl
– You prefer in-ear — AirPods Pro 3 have the same H2 chip for less than half the price

Our choice: AirPods Max 2 in Northern color — classic, versatile, and you won’t get bored of it after a year.

In the store homescreen.pl, you will find cases tailored to various generations and models of AirPods – from classic models (1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation), through the newer AirPods 4, to models AirPods Pro 2 or AirPods Pro 3. This way, you can easily choose a protective case perfectly suited to your headphones, regardless of which generation or variant you have.

Check all accessories for AirPods at homescreen.pl →

FAQ — frequently asked questions

When is the release of AirPods Max 2 in Poland?

Orders for the new headphones start on March 25, 2026, and the first deliveries in Poland will begin in early April 2026. They will be available in authorized Apple stores and through retail partners.

How much do AirPods Max 2 cost in Poland?

The price of the second generation in Poland is 2499 PLN — the same as the USB-C version of the previous model. In the USA, the price is 549 dollars.

What are the differences between AirPods Max 2 and the first generation?

The main differences are the H2 chip instead of H1, 1.5x better noise cancellation, Bluetooth 5.3, lossless audio via USB-C, and new features: Adaptive Audio, Conversation Detection, Voice Isolation, and Live Translation. The design and battery (20 h) remain unchanged.

Do AirPods Max 2 have USB-C?

Yes, the second generation uses only the USB-C port for charging and wired listening to lossless music (24-bit / 48 kHz).

What colors are available for AirPods Max 2?

The new model is available in five colors: Midnight (black), Lunar Glow (gold), Blue, Purple, and Orange. This is a completely new palette compared to the first generation.

Is it worth buying AirPods Max 2 instead of Sony WH-1000XM5?

The second generation Apple Max headphones are a better choice for users of the Apple ecosystem due to automatic switching between devices and smart features. The Sony WH-1000XM5 offers comparable ANC at a lower price (around 1299 PLN) and works better with Android devices.

2026-03-18

Nothing Phone 4a and 4a Pro — specifications, prices, and release in Poland

Nothing officially presented the Phone 4a and 4a Pro. Prices in Poland start at 1,599 PLN for the 4a model and 2,099 PLN for the 4a Pro. Both smartphones feature a periscope telephoto lens with 3.5x optical zoom, 1.5K AMOLED displays, and a new Glyph system. Pre-orders for the Phone 4a start today — sales begin on March 13.

The Nothing Phone 4a series represents the biggest quality leap in the history of the “a” line. Periscope zoom, screen brightness up to 5,000 nits, and the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 processor are specifications that just a year ago were found only in flagship devices. Nothing poses the question: why pay for a flagship when a mid-range device offers 90% of its capabilities?

What’s new in the Nothing Phone 4a and 4a Pro?

The biggest changes compared to the previous generation (Phone 3a / 3a Pro):

50 MP periscope telephoto lens with 3.5x optical zoom — a huge leap from the 2x zoom in the Phone 3a. Hybrid zoom reaches 70x in the 4a and 140x in the 4a Pro.
Brighter screens — 4,500 nits (4a) and 5,000 nits (4a Pro) vs ~2,300 nits in predecessors. Gorilla Glass 7i instead of Panda Glass.
New processors — Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (4a) and Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4a Pro). The Pro model is ~27% faster in CPU and ~65% more efficient in AI tasks.
Revamped Glyph — Phone 4a received the Glyph Bar (63 mini-LEDs in 7 zones), while the 4a Pro got the Glyph Matrix (137 mini-LEDs with animations).
Nothing OS 4.1 on Android 16 — 3 years of system updates + 6 years of security patches.
eSIM in the Pro model — Phone 4a still uses only physical nano-SIM cards.

Specifications of Nothing Phone 4a vs 4a Pro

Parameter	Phone 4a	Phone 4a Pro
Display	6.78″ AMOLED, 120 Hz, 4500 nit	6.83″ AMOLED, 144 Hz, 5000 nit
Resolution	1224 x 2720 (1.5K)	1260 x 2800 (1.5K)
Processor	Snapdragon 7s Gen 4	Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
RAM / storage	8/128, 8/256, 12/256 GB	8/128, 12/256 GB
Main camera	50 MP, f/1.9, OIS	50 MP Sony LYT700c, f/1.9, OIS
Telephoto	50 MP periscope, 3.5x zoom	50 MP periscope, 3.5x zoom
Hybrid zoom	up to 70x	up to 140x
Ultrawide	8 MP, f/2.2, 120°	8 MP, f/2.2, 120°
Battery	5080 mAh	5080 mAh
Charging	50W wired	50W wired + reverse 7.5W
Glyph	Glyph Bar (63 LED)	Glyph Matrix (137 LED)
IP	IP64	IP65
Thickness / weight	8.6 mm / 204.5 g	7.95 mm / 210 g
eSIM	No	Yes
Colors	white, black, pink, blue	black, silver, pink

Design — two different approaches

Nothing surprised, giving each model a distinct visual identity.

Phone 4a continues the iconic transparent design. Under the Gorilla Glass 7i, the internal components — coils, screws, and PCB structures — are visible. The new colors pink and blue have a tinted layer beneath the transparent panel, creating a subtle, pastel effect.

Phone 4a Pro is a completely different story. Nothing has given up the transparent back in favor of a metal unibody made of aluminum. It is the slimmest Nothing in history (7.95 mm). It looks more premium, but loses some of its “nothing-ness” character. The transparent elements have been limited to the camera island.

The common denominator is Glyph. In the 4a model, it is the Glyph Bar — 7 square LED segments in a strip. In the Pro — Glyph Matrix with 137 mini-LEDs arranged in a circular field. The Matrix displays animated notifications, charging progress, and responds to Live Updates from Android 16.

Camera — periscope in a mid-range for 1,599 PLN

This is the biggest highlight of the 4a series. The 50 MP periscope telephoto lens with 3.5x optical zoom and OIS is something that did not exist in the previous generation Nothing Phone 3a. The 50 MP sensor with PDAF and optical stabilization provides sharp photos even in low light.

The Pro model gets a better main sensor — Sony LYT700c — and a dual hybrid zoom (140x vs 70x in the standard 4a). Both models record in 4K with Dolby Vision and Ultra XDR.

The new TrueLens Engine in Nothing OS 4.1 adds photographic presets, including “Stretch” developed in collaboration with photographer Jordan Hemingway.

Prices in Poland

Variant	Phone 4a	Phone 4a Pro
8 GB / 128 GB	1,599 PLN	2,099 PLN
8 GB / 256 GB	1,749 PLN	—
12 GB / 256 GB	1,899 PLN	2,399 PLN

Prices in Europe: Phone 4a from 349 EUR, Phone 4a Pro from 479 EUR.

Availability and Dates

Phone 4a: pre-sale from March 5, sales from March 13, 2026
Phone 4a Pro: pre-sale from March 13, sales from March 27, 2026

Both models are available on the official website pl.nothing.tech. Color variants: 4a in white, black, pink, and blue; 4a Pro in black, silver, and pink. Pink and blue colors are available exclusively in the 12/256 GB version.

Expect availability in Polish electronics stores after regular sales begin.

Who is Phone 4a for, and who is it for Pro?

Phone 4a for 1,599 PLN is the choice if you care about the transparent design of Nothing and don’t need the fastest processor. You get a periscope zoom, a great 1.5K screen, and Glyph Bar — all for under 1,600 PLN. The best price-to-performance ratio in the series.

Phone 4a Pro for 2,099 PLN makes sense if you want a faster processor (+27% CPU, +65% AI), 144 Hz instead of 120 Hz, IP65, eSIM, and Glyph Matrix with animations. The unibody metal construction looks premium, although it loses the iconic transparent style.

Both models are a very strong proposition in their price ranges. The 3.5x periscope telephoto lens for 1,599 PLN is something that no competitor offers at this price.

Best accessories for Nothing Phone 4a Pro

2026-03-18

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Watch Ultra 3 – comparison, differences, and cost-effectiveness

Apple Watch Ultra 3 is an evolution, not a revolution compared to Ultra 2 – both watches look almost identical, but Ultra 3 has a larger screen, longer battery life, satellite connectivity, and a 5G RedCap modem. For most users, Ultra 2 will still be a great choice, but if you are just buying a premium smartwatch or need maximum independence in the field – Ultra 3 is the best choice for 2025.

Comparison table: Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Ultra 3

Feature	Apple Watch Ultra 2 (2023)	Apple Watch Ultra 3 (2025)
Starting price (PL)	currently approx. 3399 PLN	3799 PLN (launch price)
Case material	Grade 5 Titanium (natural or black)	Grade 5 Titanium (natural or black)
Dimensions	49 × 44 × 14.4 mm	49 × 44 × 12 mm
Weight (without strap)	61.4–61.8 g	61.6–61.8 g
Display	1.92″ LTPO OLED (410 × 502 px, 326 ppi) – 3000 nits	1.99″ LTPO3 OLED (422 × 514 px, 326 ppi) – 3000 nits
Processor (SiP)	Apple S9 + Neural Engine	Apple S10 + Neural Engine
Internal memory	64 GB	64 GB
Cellular connectivity	4G/LTE (eSIM)	5G RedCap + 4G/LTE (eSIM)
Satellite connectivity	❌ No	✅ Emergency SOS via Satellite
Local connectivity	Wi-Fi 4 (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, UWB 2nd gen., GPS L1+L5	Same
Battery – typical use	Up to 36 h	Up to 42 h
Battery – Low Power Mode	Up to 72 h	Up to 72 h
Durability	WR100, IP6X, MIL-STD-810H	WR100, IP6X, MIL-STD-810H
Health sensors	Heart rate, ECG, SpO₂, temp., accelerometer, gyroscope	The same + hypertension notifications, Sleep Score
Sports features	Multi-sport, Backtrack, compass, GPS L1+L5	The same + Workout Buddy (AI coach)
Operating system	watchOS 10 → update to watchOS 26	watchOS 26 (factory)
Update support	until 2028	until 2030

What does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 look like and how does it differ from the Ultra 2?

Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 have a new design?

On the outside, Apple Watch Ultra 3 looks almost identical to Ultra 2, but the devil is in the details. Apple has retained the distinctive aircraft-grade titanium case (Grade 5) in a size of 49 mm, however, the new model has thinner screen bezels by 24%. This allows the Ultra 3 to offer a larger working area (1.99 ″ vs 1.92 ″) without increasing the overall dimensions.

Interestingly, the case of the Ultra 3 is also thinner (12 mm instead of 14.4 mm), which makes the watch sit better on the wrist.
The weight remains almost identical – about 61–62 g without the strap, so there is no noticeable difference in weight during daily use.

What materials are used in the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Both watches – Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 – utilize the same, exceptionally durable titanium and sapphire glass that is scratch-resistant.
The construction meets the standards of IP6X, WR100 (up to 100 m immersion) and MIL-STD-810H, which is the military standard for resistance to shocks, dust, moisture, and extreme temperatures.

In practice, this means that both Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 are ready for mountain trekking, swimming, and even diving up to 40 m – ideal for outdoor athletes.

What colors are available for the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Apple continues with two color variants:

Natural titanium (silver)
Black titanium

These are minimalist, elegant shades that pair well with any strap – from silicone sports to leather and fabric.
👉 See straps for Apple Watch Ultra 3 at Home Screen store

Display, performance, and battery – what has been improved in the Apple Watch Ultra 3?

Is the display in Ultra 3 better?

Yes. The Ultra 3 has a newer LTPO OLED 3rd generation panel, which provides better viewing angles, deeper blacks, and greater energy efficiency.
Although the brightness remains the same (3000 nits), in practice, the Ultra 3 is more readable in sunlight and has a smoother always-on mode with a 1 Hz refresh rate – for the first time on the Apple Watch, you can constantly see the second hand.

The resolution has increased from 410×502 px to 422×514 px, which is not revolutionary but improves the sharpness of dials and the readability of maps in workout mode.

Does the new S10 processor make a difference?

The Apple Watch Ultra 3 is powered by a S10 SiP chip, which replaced the S9 from Ultra 2.
The differences in speed are minimal, but S10 is more energy-efficient, which combined with the new display gives a real +6 hours of battery.
The new chip also enables the “wrist flick” gesture (waving the wrist for control) and better processing of AI features with watchOS 26.

How long does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 last on battery?

Apple declares:

Ultra 2: up to 36 hours of normal usage
Ultra 3: up to 42 hours (normally) or 72 hours in power-saving mode

Tests confirm that the Ultra 3 actually lasts up to 2–3 days with typical usage (with Always-On Display).
Fast USB-C charging in 15 minutes adds about 12 hours of usage.

👉 Check fast chargers for Apple Watch Ultra 3

Connectivity and new features

5G, satellite, and greater independence

The Apple Watch Ultra 3 is the first Apple smartwatch with support for 5G RedCap networks and satellite SOS connectivity.
This allows the watch to connect to the network even in areas without GSM coverage.
The Emergency SOS via Satellite feature allows you to send an emergency message and GPS coordinates to rescue services or emergency contacts — it works similarly to the iPhone 14 and 15.
This solution is primarily aimed at people who engage in trekking, sailing, or off-roading, where lack of coverage is a real problem.

The new 5G RedCap modem improves coverage and energy efficiency, not offering the full 5G speed known from smartphones, but sufficient for maps, notifications, or Siri.
In Poland, the 5G Standalone feature is already being implemented by operators, so Ultra 3 will be fully compatible in the coming months.

Additional connectivity enhancements

improved antenna layout (better coverage in difficult terrain),
UWB 2nd gen. – precise device locating in the “Find” app,
dual GPS L1+L5 – accurate route tracking even in mountains and cities,
Bluetooth 5.3 and Wi-Fi 4 (2.4 / 5 GHz) with lower power consumption.

These enhancements make Ultra 3 the most “independent” Apple smartwatch to date – it operates independently from the iPhone, even in the field.

Health and sports features

Both generations of Apple Watch Ultra offer a wide range of health sensors, however, Ultra 3 expands their capabilities through software.
The watch monitors heart rate (optical 3rd gen), ECG, blood oxygen (SpO₂), body temperature, and detects falls and accidents (Crash Detection).

The new features in Ultra 3 are:

notifications for hypertension,
Sleep Score – daily sleep quality assessment,
Workout Buddy – an intelligent AI coach from Apple Intelligence, analyzing progress and motivating during workouts.

In terms of sports, both models offer:

measurement of running power, stride length, and ground contact,
precise GPS L1+L5 and barometric altimeter,
Multi-sport mode (triathlon, cycling, swimming, climbing),
86 dB emergency siren and Backtrack mode (return navigation).

The watches are waterproof up to 100 m, resistant to saltwater and dust, and thanks to the EN13319 certification, they can serve as a dive computer.

Software and Support

How long will Apple update these watches?

Apple is known for its long support of its devices, and the Ultra series is no exception.
Apple Watch Ultra 2 debuted with watchOS 10, and after updates, it now runs on watchOS 26, while Ultra 3 comes factory-installed with this version.

How long will support last?

Ultra 2 – security and system updates expected until around 2028,
Ultra 3 – full support until 2030.

This means that by purchasing the Ultra 3, you gain two more years of updates, which translates to a longer device lifespan and access to new Apple Intelligence (AI) features that may require the newer S10 chip in the future.

Compatibility and Ecosystem

Both models work with iPhone 11 or newer (running iOS 26).
Thanks to integration with the Apple ecosystem, users can take advantage of:

Apple Fitness+ (workouts with trainers),
Apple Pay (contactless payments),
Apple Music and Podcasts,
health data synchronization in iCloud.

Ultra 3 and Ultra 2 also have full accessory compatibility – 49 mm bands and chargers are interchangeable between generations.

Is it worth buying the Apple Watch Ultra 3 instead of Ultra 2?

For most users, the differences between Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 are not revolutionary, but they are real.
The new model is more efficient, lasts longer on battery, supports 5G and satellite communication, and has longer support.

When is it better to choose Ultra 3?

if you don’t have an Ultra series watch yet,
if you often stay out of network coverage (mountains, sailing, travel),
if you want the most future-proof model with 5G and SOS via Satellite,
if you care about an AI trainer and longer battery life.

When is it better to buy the Ultra 2?

when you have a limited budget – the price difference is often 400–600 PLN,
if you mainly use the watch in the city and do not need satellite connectivity,
if you already have the Ultra 2 – switching does not make much economic sense.

In terms of cost-effectiveness, a simple rule can be applied:

🔹 New users → choose Ultra 3
🔹 Ultra 2 owners → stick with your current model

📊 Summary: Apple Watch Ultra 3 vs Ultra 2

Aspect	Better Choice	Comment
Design and Build Quality	Draw	Both models are titanium, same sturdiness
Display	Ultra 3	Thinner bezels, newer LTPO3 panel
Battery	Ultra 3	+6 hours with typical usage
Connectivity	Ultra 3	5G RedCap + SOS via Satellite
Health Features	Ultra 3	New algorithms: hypertension, Sleep Score
Sports Features	Draw	Workout Buddy (AI) only in Ultra 3
Price	Ultra 2	Usually cheaper by 400–600 PLN
System Support	Ultra 3	Until 2030 (vs 2028)

💬 User Opinions and Reviews

Reviewers (The Verge, Tom’s Guide, MacRumors) unanimously emphasize that Ultra 3 is a great smartwatch, but more of an improvement than a revolution.
New features are mainly valuable for those who need them in practice (outdoor, safety, sports).

“Ultra 3 is for those who do not yet have Ultra — for Ultra 2 owners, it’s more of a luxury than a necessity.” — The Verge

Users praise primarily the longer battery life, larger screen, and the sturdiness of the construction.
The most common conclusion: if this is your first Ultra – go for the “three”; if you have the “two” – wait for the Ultra 4.

FAQ – frequently asked questions about Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2

⭐️ Is it worth buying the Apple Watch Ultra 3 in 2025?
Yes, if you are just buying your first Apple Watch Ultra. The Ultra 3 model has a larger screen, longer battery life, satellite connectivity, and 5G support, making it the most future-proof choice. For Ultra 2 owners, the change is not necessary, as the differences are not revolutionary.

⭐️ What is the difference between the Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2?
The Ultra 3 has a larger screen (1.99″ vs 1.92″), thinner bezels, a newer S10 processor, 5G RedCap connectivity, SOS via Satellite feature, and longer software support until 2030. The other elements – such as health sensors or durability – are practically identical.

⭐️ How long does the battery last in the Apple Watch Ultra 3?
The watch lasts up to 42 hours with normal use and up to 72 hours in power-saving mode. Thanks to fast charging, just 15 minutes is enough to gain about 12 hours of use.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 work in Poland with 5G network?
Yes, it uses the 5G RedCap mode, which operates in Standalone (SA) 5G networks. Polish operators – including Plus, Orange, and T-Mobile – are gradually implementing this solution, so compatibility will expand.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 support SOS via satellite in Poland?
Yes, Apple has announced the availability of the Emergency SOS via Satellite feature for users in Poland and the entire EU. The service is free for the first 2 years after activating the watch.

⭐️ Do the bands and cases from Apple Watch Ultra 2 fit Ultra 3?
Yes. All accessories for the 49 mm case are fully compatible. Therefore, you can use existing bands, cases, and chargers with the new model.

⭐️ Does the Apple Watch Ultra 3 have new health features?
Ultra 3 introduces hypertension notifications and the Sleep Score feature – a sleep quality assessment. Both models measure heart rate, ECG, SpO₂, and detect falls or accidents (Crash Detection).

⭐️ Is the Apple Watch Ultra 3 suitable for diving?
Yes. The watch is water-resistant up to 100 meters and meets the EN13319 standard, allowing it to be used as a dive computer up to 40 m deep. It also works in saltwater and extreme temperatures.

⭐️ What are the prices of Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Ultra 2 in Poland?
Ultra 3 costs about 3799 PLN (launch), while Ultra 2 is available from about 3399 PLN. The difference of about 400–600 PLN depends on the store and promotions. If Ultra 2 is significantly cheaper, it will still be a very good choice.

⭐️ Does Apple Watch Ultra 3 work without an iPhone?
Yes. Thanks to the eSIM module and cellular connectivity (LTE/5G), Ultra 3 can operate independently – receiving calls, messages, and GPS data without a phone nearby.

⭐️ Does Ultra 3 support Apple Pay and Siri in Polish?
Yes, the watch fully supports Apple Pay and Siri in Polish, both online and offline (thanks to on-device processing).

⭐️ Does Apple Watch Ultra 3 have a better screen than Ultra 2?
Yes. Although the brightness remains at 3000 nits, Ultra 3 features a newer 3rd generation LTPO OLED display, with thinner bezels and better viewing angles.

2026-03-15

iPad Pro M5 vs M4 – which one is worth buying in 2025?

The latest iPad Pro with the M5 chip is an evolutionary upgrade over its predecessor, the M4. It offers higher performance (especially in graphics and AI), faster connectivity (Wi‑Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, faster 5G), and support for fast charging. The iPad Pro M5 will be the best choice for professionals and the most demanding users, while the iPad Pro M4 will still perform excellently for those with slightly lower requirements – and at a lower price.

📊iPad Pro M5 vs iPad Pro M4 – Comparison Table

Feature	iPad Pro M4 11″	iPad Pro M4 12.9″	iPad Pro M5 11″	iPad Pro M5 13″
Display	11″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR, 120 Hz, HDR	12.9″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR	11″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR	13″ OLED Ultra Retina XDR
Processor	Apple M4	Apple M4	Apple M5	Apple M5
RAM	8–16 GB	8–16 GB	12–16 GB	12–16 GB
Storage	256 GB – 2 TB SSD	256 GB – 2 TB SSD	256 GB – 2 TB (faster SSD)	256 GB – 2 TB (faster SSD)
Cameras	12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR	12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR	unchanged	unchanged
Connectivity	Wi-Fi 6E, BT 5.3	Wi-Fi 6E, BT 5.3	Wi-Fi 7, BT 6, 5G C1X	Wi-Fi 7, BT 6, 5G C1X
Charging	approx. 20–30 W	approx. 20–30 W	Fast Charge (50% in 30 min)	Fast Charge (50% in 30 min)
System	iPadOS 17	iPadOS 17	iPadOS 26	iPadOS 26
Starting Price	from 999 USD	from 1299 USD	from 999 USD	from 1299 USD

At first glance: iPad Pro M5 and M4 are very similar in terms of base specifications – both come in the same sizes and have fantastic OLED displays, identical cameras, and casings. The biggest differences lie in performance and internal components: the M5 chip offers higher performance than the M4, M5 models have more RAM in cheaper configurations, as well as newer connectivity modules (Wi‑Fi 7, 5G C1X modem) and fast charging capability.

Screen and design – does the iPad Pro M5 have a better display than the M4?

The same Ultra Retina XDR OLED display

Both the iPad Pro M4 and M5 have the same top-tier Ultra Retina XDR OLED screen with ProMotion 120 Hz technology and full HDR support (1600 nit peak). It’s the same tandem OLED panel that Apple introduced in 2024 and still has no competition in the tablet world.

The image quality is phenomenal: perfect blacks, high contrast, and a wide P3 color gamut. Both models provide smooth scrolling and responsiveness that no other tablet offers. In practice, you won’t notice a difference between the M4 and M5 screens – Apple didn’t need to change it, as they had already achieved a “reference” level.

Design – thin, light, and sturdy

Both generations of the iPad Pro have the same aerospace aluminum construction, with flat edges and very thin bezels.
The dimensions and weight remain identical:

iPad Pro 11″ – 5.3 mm thick, approx. 470 g
iPad Pro 13″ – 5.1 mm thick, approx. 570 g

These are still the thinnest tablets on the market. A new feature of the iPad Pro M5 is the Space Black color, which has replaced the previous star gray. For many users, this is a minor but desirable aesthetic change.

💡 Check also cases for iPad Pro 13″ or cases for iPad Pro 11″, to properly protect this ultra-thin design from scratches.

Front camera – now in a better position

The most practical change concerns the position of the front camera. In the iPad Pro M5, it has been moved to the longer edge, allowing you to look directly into the lens during landscape mode calls.
In the M4, the camera was on the shorter side, so in horizontal orientation, it gave the impression of a “side glance.” If you often hold online meetings or video lessons – this improvement really makes a difference.

Performance and computing power – Apple M5 vs M4

How big is the performance difference between M4 and M5?

The Apple M5 chip is an improved version of the M4 chip, made using the same 3 nm process, but with a new core architecture.

CPU: up to 15% faster, with better energy management,
GPU: up to 40% more powerful, with support for 3rd generation ray tracing,
Neural Engine: up to 4× faster in AI tasks.

In everyday use (notes, browsing the web, movies), the differences are minimal. But if you work with RAW files, design in Procreate, edit 4K videos in LumaFusion, or use AI applications – M5 provides a real boost in work comfort.

More RAM in cheaper models

This is a significant change.

iPad Pro M4 (256/512 GB) → 8 GB RAM
iPad Pro M5 (256/512 GB) → 12 GB RAM

For demanding applications, this is a big difference – M5 handles multitasking better and keeps more projects open without refreshing. The 1 TB and 2 TB versions in both models have 16 GB RAM.

Faster disk and memory

The M5 uses newer NVMe SSD modules, offering up to 2× faster data read and write speeds. The memory bandwidth has also been increased to 153 GB/s (up from 120 GB/s in the M4).
The result: shorter application loading times, faster transfer of large files, and smoother performance in professional applications.

Battery and charging – does the iPad Pro M5 last longer?

Battery life

Apple claims the same operating time: up to 10 hours of Wi-Fi or 9 hours on 5G.
In practice, the iPad Pro M5 has slightly better energy efficiency – thanks to the newer processor and modem, it consumes less power under heavy load (e.g., during 4K streaming or working on 5G).

Fast charging – finally!

The biggest novelty is fast charge.
The iPad Pro M5 can be charged up to 50% in about 30 minutes using a 40W or stronger power adapter (e.g., a MacBook charger).
The M4 model did not support fast charging and needed over an hour for a similar result.
This is a huge advantage if you use the iPad outdoors or want to quickly recharge it between meetings.

🔋 Also see tempered glass for iPad Pro 13″ and glass for iPad Pro 11″, if you want to protect the screen from damage during everyday use or charging in a bag.

Cameras and multimedia – does M5 take better photos?

Rear setup unchanged

Both models have the same configuration:

main camera 12 MP (f/1.8),
ultra-wide 10 MP (123°),
LiDAR scanner for AR and autofocus.

The quality of photos and 4K videos remains the same. Apple has not changed the sensors or optics. These are solid cameras for scans and recordings, but they still do not match the Pro iPhones.

Front camera – practical change

The 12 Mpix module with Center Stage remains the same, but its position (on the longer side in M5) significantly improves the comfort of video conferencing.

Sound and multimedia

The system of four stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos remains unchanged. The sound is still fantastic – full and loud, even without headphones.
Both iPads lack a 3.5 mm Jack socket, but you can use USB-C or Bluetooth headphones.

Connectivity and accessories – what’s new in the iPad Pro M5?

Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6

The new connectivity chip in M5 supports the Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) standard, providing higher speeds and lower latency.
M4 remains with Wi-Fi 6E.
Bluetooth 6 allows simultaneous audio connections and better energy management – these are future-proof features that you will appreciate over time.

5G C1X modem

The iPad Pro M5 received a custom Apple C1X modem instead of a Qualcomm chip. It is even 50% faster and consumes less energy.
If you often work in the field, M5 will provide more stable connections and fewer signal “drops.”

Accessory compatibility

Full compatibility in both directions:

Apple Pencil 2 and Apple Pencil Pro work with M4 and M5,
Magic Keyboard (old and new with function key row) fits both models,
the same Smart Connector and magnetic mounts.

No need to buy new accessories when changing iPads – that’s a big plus.

Is it worth paying extra for the iPad Pro M5?

When it’s worth choosing M5

You work with video, 3D graphics, design, or AI.
You often use a 5G modem and care about faster transmission.
You need fast-charge and modern connectivity standards.
You want hardware with longer system support (iPadOS 26+).

When M4 is enough

You use the iPad for notes, movies, games, and daily tasks.
You don’t need the fastest networks or fast charging.
What matters to you is a lower price – M4 offers 90% of the capabilities of M5, often on sale for several hundred zlotys less.

❓ FAQ – Frequently Asked Questions about iPad Pro M5 vs iPad Pro M4

🔹 What is the main difference between iPad Pro M5 and M4?

The iPad Pro M5 has a newer processor Apple M5, faster GPU and AI, more RAM in cheaper models, and supports fast charging. The rest (screen, casing, cameras) remains unchanged.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a better screen?

No. Both iPad Pros have the same Ultra Retina XDR OLED 120 Hz screen, with brightness up to 1600 nits.

🔹 Is it worth paying extra for the iPad Pro M5?

Yes – if you use the iPad for graphics, video, 3D projects, or AI.
No – if you mainly use it for multimedia and notes.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a faster processor?

Yes, the processor Apple M5 is about ~15% faster in CPU and up to 40% faster in GPU than M4.

🔹 How much RAM do the iPad Pro M4 and M5 have?

M4: 8 GB (256/512 GB) or 16 GB (1–2 TB)
M5: 12 GB (256/512 GB) or 16 GB (1–2 TB)

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a longer battery life?

Unofficially – slightly longer under heavy load, but Apple claims the same 10 hours.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 support fast charging?

Yes. It supports fast-charge 50% in 30 minutes (charger ≥ 40 W).

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M4 support fast charging?

No. M4 charges at standard speed (20–30 W), without fast-charge mode.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a better camera?

No. The cameras are identical (12 + 10 Mpix + LiDAR), only the position of the front camera differs – in M5 it is on the side.

🔹 Is the camera on the iPad Pro M5 better for video calls?

Yes, because it has been moved to the longer edge – now you look directly into the lens during a call.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have Wi-Fi 7?

Yes, M5 supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6. M4 has Wi-Fi 6E and BT 5.3.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 have a new 5G modem?

Yes. M5 uses the Apple C1X modem – faster and more energy-efficient than Qualcomm in M4.

🔹 Does the iPad Pro M5 work with Apple Pencil Pro?

Yes. Apple Pencil Pro works with the iPad Pro M5 and M4.

🔹 Do accessories from the iPad Pro M4 fit M5?

Yes – full compatibility. Magic Keyboard, Apple Pencil, and other accessories work on both models.

2026-03-15

Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17 – what’s new?

The series Xiaomi 17 is a significant step forward compared to Xiaomi 15. All models – from the basic to Pro Max – bring the new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, better Leica cameras, larger batteries (up to 7500 mAh) and the newer HyperOS 3.0 system based on Android 16.
Meanwhile, Xiaomi 15 still remains an excellent choice for those looking for top performance at a lower price.

Comparison table Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17

Specification	Xiaomi 15 / 15 Pro / 15 Pro Max	Xiaomi 17 / 17 Pro / 17 Pro Max
Release Date	Q4 2024 (globally)	Q3 2025 (China), globally 2026
System / UI	Android 15, HyperOS 2.0	Android 16, HyperOS 3.0
Display	6.36″ LTPO AMOLED (3200 nit HDR, 120 Hz) – Pro / Pro Max up to 6.7″	6.3″ LTPO AMOLED (3500 nit HDR, 120 Hz) – Pro / Pro Max with rear OLED display (2.7–2.9″)
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm, Oryon V2 up to 4.32 GHz)	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm, Oryon V3 up to 4.6 GHz)
GPU	Adreno 830	Adreno 840
RAM / Storage	12/16 GB LPDDR5x, 256/512 GB UFS 4.0 (1 TB in Pro Max)	12/16 GB LPDDR5x, 256/512 GB UFS 4.1 (1 TB in Pro / Pro Max)
Rear Camera	50 MP (f/1.6, OIS) + 50 MP wide (115°) + 50 MP tele 2.6× (Pro 5×)	50 MP (f/1.7, Leica, OIS) + 50 MP wide (102° or macro 5 cm) + 50 MP tele 2.6× / 5×
Front Camera	32 MP (f/2.0), no AF (Pro with AF)	50 MP (f/2.2, PDAF) with autofocus
Battery	5240–6100 mAh (15–Pro Max), 90 W / 50 W	6300–7500 mAh (17–Pro Max), 120 W / 50 W
Connectivity	5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, Dual SIM + eSIM, USB-C 3.2 DP, IP68	5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, UWB (Pro / Pro Max), USB-C 3.2 DP, IP68
Glass / Other	Dragon Glass 2, ultrasonic reader	Dragon Glass 3, UWB, rear display (Pro / Pro Max)
Price (starting)	from approx. 3779 PLN (12/256 GB, PL 2025)	similar price level in China – PL premiere 2026

**from left, Xiaomi 17, 17 Pro Max, Xiaomi 17 Pro**

Performance of Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17

Which one is faster?

Both smartphones are powered by top Qualcomm processors. Xiaomi 15 uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) chip with Oryon V2 cores (up to 4.32 GHz) and Adreno 830 graphics, while Xiaomi 17 received the newer Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) with Oryon V3 cores (up to 4.6 GHz) and Adreno 840 graphics.

In practice, this translates to a noticeable increase in performance. According to the manufacturer, the unit in Xiaomi 17 is 20–50% faster than in Xiaomi 15. Benchmarks confirm this data – GeekBench shows around 3440 points (single-core) for Xiaomi 17 vs 2769 points for Xiaomi 15, and AnTuTu gives a clear advantage to the new model.

In everyday use

Both smartphones offer 12 or 16 GB of LPDDR5x memory, ensuring smooth operation of the system and games. However, Xiaomi 17 handles multitasking better, loads applications faster, and maintains high performance longer under heavy load. For gamers and demanding users – the choice is obvious.

Xiaomi 15 vs Xiaomi 17 Display

Does Xiaomi 17 have a better display than Xiaomi 15?

Xiaomi 15 has an LTPO AMOLED panel with a diagonal of 6.36″, a resolution of 2670 × 1200 px (~460 ppi), and a variable refresh rate from 1 to 120 Hz. The maximum brightness reached 3200 nits.
Xiaomi 17 offers a display also LTPO AMOLED with a diagonal of 6.3″, a resolution of 2656 × 1220 px (~464 ppi) with an adaptive refresh rate of 1-120 Hz, but with a maximum brightness of up to 3500 nits and Dragon Crystal Glass 3 protective glass.

🔎 What does this mean in practice

In strong sunlight conditions, the Xiaomi 17 display will be more readable due to its higher brightness – which translates to better visibility outdoors.
LTPO with a range of 1–120 Hz means that the refresh rate can be dynamically adjusted depending on the content, which helps save battery – both generations have this feature, but the 17 is a more refined solution.
Higher brightness and newer protective glass in the Xiaomi 17 also mean better durability and a lower risk of glare or loss of readability in sunlight.
Although the change in screen size is minimal (6.36″ → 6.3″), the Xiaomi 17 gains in compactness and better aspect ratio while maintaining excellent image quality.

Additional improvements in the Xiaomi 17 series (Pro and Pro Max):

For the Pro and Pro Max variants, there is a secondary display on the back of the case with a diagonal of about 2.7″-2.9″ – which can serve as a preview for the cameras or display notifications.
Higher brightness (3500 nits) is also maintained in Pro/Pro Max, which means that regardless of the version, you get a top-tier panel.

✅ Conclusion

If the priority is a best display — meaning excellent brightness, fast refresh rate adaptation, and better protective glass — then the Xiaomi 17 performs better than the Xiaomi 15. However, if you mainly use your smartphone in normal conditions and do not care about extreme brightness or a Pro/Pro Max rear display — the Xiaomi 15’s screen still meets most needs.

👉 Check out tempered glass for Xiaomi 15

Leica Camera in Xiaomi 15 and 17

Which one takes better photos?

In the camera section, both smartphones are at a very high level, but the Xiaomi 17 introduces several significant improvements compared to the Xiaomi 15.

In the Xiaomi 15: rear set of three 50 MP cameras (main f/1.62 + ultra-wide f/2.2 + tele f/2.0, 2.6× zoom) according to the DXOMARK test.
In the Xiaomi 17: also three 50 MP cameras each, but with the newer Light Fusion 950 sensor (1/1.31″, f/1.67) and ultra-wide 50 MP f/2.4, tele 50 MP 2.6× zoom (and in Pro/Pro Max variants even 5× optical zoom).
Front camera in the Xiaomi 17: 50 MP with PDAF and autofocus — in the Xiaomi 15 it was 32 MP without AF

What does it mean in practice?

Better photo quality in low light: a larger sensor and improved lens in the Xiaomi 17 mean more light, less noise, and better dynamic range (in Pro/Pro Max versions with LOFIC technology for 16.5 EV).
Better zooms: the basic 17 model maintains a 2.6× zoom, but the Pro and Pro Max versions are equipped with a 5× telephoto lens with a larger sensor – providing a real advantage when photographing from a distance.
Higher selfie detail: 50 MP with autofocus in the 17 is definitely an improved front camera compared to 32 MP without AF in the 15.
New features and processing: The 17 series uses newer Leica AI algorithms and better optics — effectively improving colors, contrast, and depth.

✅ Conclusions

If the camera is a priority for you, then the Xiaomi 17 takes photography and video to the next level: better zooms, better sensor, more details.
However, if your needs are standard — photos, videos, social media — the Xiaomi 15 still delivers great results and may be a more cost-effective choice.

🛒 Check out cases for Xiaomi 15 at Home Screen store

Battery and charging – Xiaomi 17 outclasses its predecessor

How long does Xiaomi 17 last?

The biggest advancement between the Xiaomi 15 and 17 series concerns the battery and energy efficiency.

Xiaomi 15 offered a battery capacity of 5240 mAh,
Xiaomi 15 Pro – about 5700 mAh,
Xiaomi 15 Pro Max – about 6100 mAh.

The new generation takes it a step further:

Xiaomi 17 has 7000 mAh,
Xiaomi 17 Pro – 6300 mAh,
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max – up to 7500 mAh, making it one of the most powerful flagships on the market.

The difference is huge – in practice, the 17 series lasts even 40–60% longer on a single charge than the 15 series.
The new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chips, manufactured using a 3 nm process, are more energy-efficient, so even more powerful devices consume less energy.

⚡ Charging speed

Xiaomi 15 / Pro / Pro Max: 90 W wired + 50 W wireless + 22.5 W reverse charging.
Xiaomi 17 / Pro / Pro Max: up to 120 W wired, 50 W wireless, 22.5 W reverse.

This means that even the huge 7500 mAh battery in the Pro Max model can be fully charged in about 25 minutes, while the smaller Xiaomi 17 can recharge in under 20 minutes.

In practice:

10 minutes of charging is about 50 % energy,
30 minutes – full charge,
and the 50 W wireless works stably even with Qi2 chargers.

✅ Conclusion

The Xiaomi 17 series offers not only more power but also record battery life.
The 17 Pro Max with a 7500 mAh battery and 120 W charging is one of the most efficient flagships of 2025/2026. If battery life and fast charging are your priorities – this version definitely outperforms the previous series 15.

👉 Check out fast chargers for Xiaomi 17

System and features

What’s new in HyperOS 3.0 and Android 16?

The Xiaomi 17 series features the latest version of the interface — HyperOS 3.0, based on Android 16. The system introduces, among other things:

a refreshed interface with faster animations and less delay,
better energy management and RAM optimization — which positively affects smooth operation and multitasking,
new “Cross-Device” features and AI assistants that better integrate the phone with other Xiaomi devices (e.g., TV, headphones, tablet).
Additionally, the HyperOS 3.0 update in the 17 models has been confirmed with version 3.0.17.0, containing stability fixes and optimizations for the rear screen and gaming.

🔹 Pro and Pro Max Versions – rear screen, UWB, and advanced features

In the 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max models, hardware and software features not available in the base version have been added:

OLED rear screen (“Dynamic Back Display”) with a diagonal of ~2.7″–2.9″, allowing for camera preview, notifications, or wallpaper personalization.
support for UWB (Ultra Wide Band) technology – used for precise device location and better integration with accessories (e.g., headphones, locators).
better cooling, larger memory (up to 1 TB), which translates to even smoother operation and greater future-proofing of the smartphone.

Price and availability

which Xiaomi is more worth it?

Xiaomi 17 debuted in China in October 2025 and will hit the global market in 2026. Prices remain similar to Xiaomi 15 – around 4500 PLN for the 12/256 GB version.

Xiaomi 15 is already available in Poland and currently costs about 3779 PLN, and after the release of the newer model, it will be possible to buy it even cheaper.

💸 Conclusion: if you want to save money – choose Xiaomi 15. If you care about maximum performance and battery – Xiaomi 17 will be a better choice.

🏁 Final opinion – which model to choose?

After analyzing all key aspects — performance, screen, cameras, battery, system, and price — here’s a summary of which model will be best in a specific situation:

✅ If you care about maximum performance and the best possible smartphone for years, choose:

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — the largest display (6.9″), huge battery (~7500 mAh), 5× optical zoom, rear OLED screen, full UWB support, latest processor.
Xiaomi 17 Pro — if you want a compromise: basically the same components as in Pro Max, but slightly smaller dimensions and a lower price.

✅ If you want a great flagship, but don’t necessarily need absolutely top parameters – for many users, the best choice will be:

Xiaomi 17 – the “basic” flagship of the 17 series: Gen 5 processor, large battery (~7000 mAh), improved camera and display — still a huge leap compared to the 15 series, but in a more accessible size.

💡 If you have a limited budget or don’t need all the “features” of the new generation — the ideal choice will be:

Xiaomi 15 – great performance, very good camera set, compact form, and attractive price. It’s still a flagship that will meet expectations in everyday use.

📣 Stay updated – when Xiaomi 17 becomes available in Poland, you will find all accessories for Xiaomi 17: cases, screen protectors, chargers, and more!

⭐ FAQ – frequently asked questions about Xiaomi 15 and Xiaomi 17

⭐ Does the case for Xiaomi 15 fit Xiaomi 17?

No, each model has different dimensions and camera placements. The case from the 15 series will not fit Xiaomi 17 – it’s worth choosing dedicated accessories.

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 have a better camera than Xiaomi 15?

Yes – primarily thanks to the new Light Fusion 950 sensor and a 50 MP selfie camera with autofocus. The Pro and Pro Max versions also offer 5× optical zoom and better night photos.

⭐ How long does Xiaomi 17 last on battery?

Depending on the model, from 9 to 12 hours of SoT (screen on time).
The Pro Max version with a 7500 mAh battery can last up to two days without charging with moderate use.

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 have wireless charging?

Yes, the entire 17 series supports 50 W wireless charging and 22.5 W reverse charging, allowing you to power up headphones, a smartwatch, or another phone.

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 have a rear display?

Yes, the Pro and Pro Max versions have an additional 2.7–2.9 inch OLED display on the back panel – for selfies, notifications, and personalization.

⭐ Is it worth buying Xiaomi 15 in 2025?

Yes. Despite the launch of the 17 series, Xiaomi 15 is still one of the best-priced flagships – it offers high performance, an AMOLED display, and Leica cameras, and its price has dropped below 3800 PLN.

⭐ When will Xiaomi 17 be available in Poland?

The global premiere is planned for Q1 2026 when the 17 series will be officially available for sale in Europe.

⭐ Does Xiaomi 17 support UWB and the latest AI features?

Yes – the 17 Pro and Pro Max models have an UWB (Ultra Wide Band) module and AI features in HyperOS 3.0 (e.g. scene recognition, speech transcription, interface personalization).

⭐ How much do Xiaomi 15 and Xiaomi 17 cost in Poland?

Xiaomi 17 (12/256 GB) – estimated around 4,500 PLN after the global premiere

Xiaomi 15 (12/256 GB) – approx. 3,779 PLN

2026-03-15

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra or F7 Ultra – which is better?

The new Poco F8 Ultra offers a larger battery (6500 mAh), a better camera (5x periscope), Bose subwoofer speakers, and a top Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 processor. The older F7 Ultra still tempts with a sharper WQHD+ display, faster 120 W charging, and a lower price.

📊 Comparison Table: Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs F8 Ultra

Parameter	Poco F7 Ultra	Poco F8 Ultra
Display	6.67″ WQHD+ AMOLED, 120 Hz	6.9″ AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz
Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Camera (rear)	50 + 50 (tele 2.5x) + 32 Mpix (ultra)	50 + 50 (5x periscope) + 50 Mpix (ultra)
Camera (front)	32 Mpix, FHD video	32 Mpix, 4K video
Battery	5300 mAh	6500 mAh
Charging	120 W wired, 50 W wireless	100 W wired, 50 W wireless, 22.5 W reverse
Audio	Stereo 2.0 (Dolby Atmos)	Stereo 2.1 + Bose subwoofer
System	Android 15, HyperOS 2	Android 16, HyperOS 3
Connectivity	5G, Wi-Fi 7-ready, Bluetooth 5.4, IR, NFC	5G + eSIM, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, IR, NFC
Price (PL)	1875 zł (12/256 GB), 1999.99 zł (16/512 GB)	2699 zł (12/256 GB), 2999 zł (16/512 GB)

What does the Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra casing look like?

What distinguishes the Denim Blue version with Bose subwoofer?

Poco F8 Ultra in the Denim Blue variant stands out with its vivid, unique design. The back with a texture resembling denim fabric gives the device a stylish yet modern character. It is not real fabric, but the visual and tactile effect is very realistic. At the top of the casing, there is a Bose logo, indicating an unusual addition – a third bass speaker, serving as a subwoofer. As a result, the F8 Ultra offers fuller, deeper sound than most smartphones – especially when playing music and movies without headphones.

Are both smartphones waterproof?

Both Poco F7 Ultra and F8 Ultra are designed with everyday durability in mind. Both models feature a metal frame, which ensures structural solidity and an elegant finish. Additionally, they meet the IP68 standard, meaning they are resistant to dirt and immersion in water – up to a depth of 1.5 m for a maximum of 30 minutes. This is a useful feature, especially in the rain, during workouts, or on vacation.

Dimensions and comfort – which model fits better in the hand?

Model	Dimensions (mm)	Weight
F8 Ultra	163.33 × 77.82 × 8.05	220 g
F7 Ultra	160.26 × 74.95 × 8.39	212 g

F8 Ultra is slightly larger, but at the same time it is thinner than its predecessor. Thanks to the rounded edges and well-balanced center of gravity, it remains comfortable to use, even with one hand. F7 Ultra is lighter and narrower – more compact, which may be appreciated by those who prefer smaller devices.

What colors are the models available in?

Poco F7 Ultra: classic black and vibrant, recognizable yellow

Poco F8 Ultra: elegant black, pure white and unique Denim Blue

The Denim Blue version is the strongest stylistic accent in the POCO lineup – it combines aesthetics with functionality (Bose speaker) and makes the device stand out from the competition.

➡️ Check the case for Poco F7 Ultra, if you want to protect the device without losing style.

➡️ In the case of F8 Ultra, check out accessories for Poco F8 Ultra – you will soon find all the necessary additions there, such as tempered glass for Poco F8 Ultra or case for Poco F8 Ultra.

Poco F8 Ultra Display vs F7 Ultra

Larger screen vs higher resolution – which provides a better effect?

Poco F8 Ultra features a larger, 6.90-inch AMOLED LTPS display with a resolution of 1200 × 2608 px (~416 ppi). The 19.5:9 aspect ratio makes the screen wider and more spacious, ideal for movies, multitasking, and gaming.

Poco F7 Ultra has a smaller, but noticeably sharper display: 6.67″ WQHD+ (1440 × 3200 px), which results in ~526 ppi. This provides noticeably better detail, especially when reading small fonts or browsing photos.

Refresh Rate and Brightness – Are There Any Differences?

Both models offer a smooth 120 Hz, HDR10+ and Dolby Vision.
F8 Ultra: up to 3500 nits brightness – screen is great visible in sunlight.
F7 Ultra: also very bright (up to 3200 nits), but slightly lags behind the newer model.

In summary:

F7 Ultra – more detailed image, ideal for text work
F8 Ultra – larger, brighter screen, great for multimedia

Processor and Performance – Which Poco is Stronger in Daily Use?

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Elite Gen 5 – How Do They Perform in Tests?

Poco F7 Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB) processor with a clock speed of up to 4.32 GHz. At the time of its release, it was one of the most powerful mobile chipsets, offering excellent performance in games and applications.

F8 Ultra takes it a step further — it features the latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) with a clock speed of up to 4.6 GHz and improved energy architecture (3 nm). In benchmarks like AnTuTu, the differences are clear:

AnTuTu: F8 Ultra approaches 3.86 million points, F7 Ultra around 2.63 million
Geekbench: F8 Ultra has about 24–25% higher single-core and multi-core performance

RAM and storage – has anything changed?

Both smartphones offer top configurations:

12 GB or 16 GB LPDDR5X RAM
256 GB or 512 GB UFS 4.1 storage
❌ No microSD card slot – you cannot expand the storage

System performance, loading applications or games with maximum details – in both cases it works great, but F8 Ultra provides a greater power reserve for the future.

Summary:

Camera – is Poco F8 Ultra the new leader in mobile photography?

What can the main lenses in F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra do?

Both models have very good, 50-megapixel main cameras with a large aperture (f/1.6–1.7) and optical image stabilization (OIS). This guarantees great photos during the day, good results after dark, and smooth shots in motion.

However, differences appear with the additional lenses.

Poco F8 Ultra – a strong advantage in zoom and wide angle

Ultrawide angle: 50 Mpix (vs 32 Mpix in F7 Ultra) – better detail and less distortion
Periscope telephoto lens: 50 Mpix with 5x optical zoom and OIS (vs 2.5x zoom in F7 Ultra)
Front camera: 32 Mpix – in F8 Ultra it records 4K, in F7 Ultra only 1080p

F8 Ultra offers better close-ups, more details, and more advanced photographic capabilities. Additionally, thanks to the periscope, photos taken from a distance maintain sharpness and quality.

F7 Ultra – still very solid optics

Great main camera with OIS
2.5x optical zoom with telephoto lens
Good daytime and nighttime shots
32 Mpix front selfie

In summary:

F8 Ultra – better zoom, better wide angle, better video with selfies
F7 Ultra – good main camera, decent telephoto lens

Battery and charging – which Poco lasts longer, and which charges faster?

Which one has a larger battery and better battery life?

POCO F8 Ultra clearly wins in terms of capacity – it has a 6500 mAh battery that provides a very long usage time even with intensive use. POCO F7 Ultra has a slightly smaller 5300 mAh battery, which also lasts all day, but offers a shorter screen-on time.

How do fast charging and wireless technologies look?

F7 Ultra supports very fast 120 W wired charging (full charge in about 30 minutes), as well as 50 W wireless charging and 10–15 W reverse charging.
F8 Ultra supports 100 W wired charging, 50 W wireless charging and 22.5 W reverse charging.

Which model is better in terms of charging and battery?

F8 Ultra – longer usage time, larger capacity, and stronger reverse charging
F7 Ultra – faster wired charging, slightly smaller battery

➡️ Need fast charging? Check out the available fast chargers for Poco F8 Ultra, compatible with Power Delivery technology.

➡️ For the older model, there are also chargers for Poco F7 Ultra, perfect for fully utilizing its capabilities.

System and software – does the new Android and HyperOS make a difference?

Android 16 vs Android 15 – what has changed?

Poco F8 Ultra debuts with the latest Android 16, complemented by HyperOS 3, which is another version of the Xiaomi overlay created after moving away from MIUI. This system offers better optimization, AI support, smoother animations, and better integration with other Xiaomi devices.

Poco F7 Ultra uses Android 15 and HyperOS 2, which still provides great smoothness, but may receive one update less in the future.

What does HyperOS offer in practice?

Advanced interface customization
Intelligent memory manager
Gaming mode and advanced sound options
Longer support for F8 Ultra (Android updates + security)

In everyday use, both phones operate very smoothly. But if you care about longer support and newer AI features, F8 Ultra is the better future-proof choice.

Memory and storage – is it worth paying extra for the 512 GB version?

What memory variants do Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra offer?

Both models are available in identical configurations:

12 GB or 16 GB RAM (standard LPDDR5X – fast and energy-efficient)
256 GB or 512 GB internal storage (UFS 4.1 – very fast read/write)

This means that regardless of the model, you can count on top performance in multitasking, gaming, video editing, or storing large files.

Can memory be expanded with a microSD card?

❌ Unfortunately no. Neither the F8 Ultra nor the F7 Ultra have a memory card slot. This means that it’s worth deciding on the appropriate capacity right away – if you take a lot of photos, record 4K video, or use many offline games or applications, the 512 GB variant will be a safer choice.

Brief comparison:

Both models offer fast memory and plenty of RAM
No microSD – the choice of capacity matters right away
F8 Ultra with 512 GB is a sensible investment “for years”

Connectivity and sound – which Poco has better audio and eSIM?

Do both models have 5G, Wi-Fi 7, and modern ports?

Yes – both Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra support the latest connectivity standards:

5G dual SIM (supports two nanoSIM cards simultaneously)
Wi-Fi 7 – the fastest standard, backward compatible with Wi-Fi 6 and 5
Bluetooth:
- F8 Ultra: 6.0
- F7 Ultra: 5.4
NFC – for contactless payments on both
USB-C:
- F8 Ultra: USB 3.2
- F7 Ultra: USB 2.0
F8 Ultra additionally supports eSIM – a convenient solution for travelers

Does the sound differ as well?

Definitely yes! Poco F8 Ultra has an advantage in the audio system:

F8 Ultra: the first smartphone with triple 2.1 speaker setup – two stereo + Bose subwoofer
F7 Ultra: stereo with Dolby

Which Poco Ultra is worth choosing?

Poco F8 Ultra is a more modern, more efficient, and more multimedia-oriented model:

✅ larger battery (6500 mAh)
✅ more powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5)
✅ better additional cameras (5x zoom, 50 Mpix ultra wide)
✅ higher screen brightness and Bose subwoofer
✅ eSIM, USB 3.2, longer software support

On the other hand, Poco F7 Ultra still has its strengths:

✅ sharper screen (WQHD+)
✅ faster charging (120 W)
✅ solid camera set and great design
✅ often lower price (especially the 12/256 GB version)

In summary:

Choose Poco F8 Ultra if you care about maximum performance, cameras, and sound
Opt for F7 Ultra if you want a great flagship at a better price and with a sharper screen

Frequently Asked Questions about Poco F8 Ultra and Poco F7 Ultra

What screen does the Poco F8 Ultra have and is it better than the F7 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra has a larger 6.9″ AMOLED screen (~1.5K) and very high brightness – up to 3500 nits.
The Poco F7 Ultra has a sharper 6.67″ WQHD+ display (526 ppi).
Choose the F8 Ultra if visibility is important to you, or the F7 Ultra if you value image sharpness.

Does the Poco F8 Ultra have better sound than the F7 Ultra?

Yes – the F8 Ultra offers a unique 2.1 speaker system with a Bose subwoofer.
This is the first Poco smartphone with a dedicated subwoofer.

Does the Poco F8 Ultra have eSIM and USB 3.2?

Yes, the F8 Ultra supports eSIM and fast USB-C 3.2.
The F7 Ultra does not offer eSIM and uses a USB 2.0 port.

Which model has a better camera: Poco F7 Ultra or F8 Ultra?

F8 Ultra has 3 cameras 50 Mpix (main, ultra wide, and 5x tele), each with OIS.
F7 Ultra has a weaker ultra-wide (32 Mpix) and a 2.5x telephoto lens.
F8 Ultra wins in terms of zoom, detail, and night shots.

How long does the battery last in Poco F8 Ultra and F7 Ultra?

F8 Ultra has a larger 6500 mAh battery and lasts noticeably longer.
F7 Ultra with 5300 mAh charges faster (120 W), but offers shorter usage time.

Is it worth buying Poco F8 Ultra in 2025?

Yes, Poco F8 Ultra is one of the most advanced smartphones in its class. Great performance, a triple 50 Mpix camera, and a Bose subwoofer make it still a very cost-effective choice.

2026-03-14

The Best Accessories for Google Pixel 10a — Cases, Glass Protectors, and Chargers for 2026

The best case for the Pixel 10a is the Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN) — transparent with raised edges and Air Cushion technology. The cheapest? The Bizon Case Salpa for 25 PLN. The Pixel 10a has a plastic back, so a case is not a luxury, but a necessity.

The Google Pixel 10a debuted on March 5, 2026. For 549 EUR, you get a Tensor G4 processor, a 48 MP camera with OIS, a 120 Hz display with Gorilla Glass 7i, and a 5100 mAh battery with 30W charging. It’s a great smartphone for its price — but it has a plastic back that scratches easily.

In this guide, you will find the best accessories for the Pixel 10a: cases starting from 25 PLN, tempered glass, and chargers that utilize the full potential of 30W fast charging.

Tip: The Pixel 10a supports 10W Qi wireless charging, but it does not have native MagSafe or Qi2. Cases with a magnetic ring (e.g., Tech-Protect or Ringke MagSafe) add compatibility with MagSafe accessories.

Check the full range of accessories for the Pixel 10a →

Ranking: 5 best cases for the Pixel 10a

1. Spigen Ultra Hybrid — transparent with Air Cushion (59 PLN)

Our choice

Spigen Ultra Hybrid is a proven series — a transparent polycarbonate back with a flexible TPU frame. Air Cushion technology in the corners absorbs impacts, and raised edges protect the screen and camera.

Air Cushion Technology — air cushions in the corners
Transparent back — shows the original color of the Pixel 10a
Raised edges — screen and camera protection
Precise cutouts for all ports and buttons

The Pixel 10a has a flat camera module (without a protruding “island”), so the case sits perfectly on any surface. For 59 PLN, you get Spigen’s proven quality and assurance of fit.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU + polycarbonate
Type	Transparent
MagSafe	❌
Price	59 PLN

2. Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe — magnetic transparent (65 PLN)

Pixel 10a does not have native MagSafe, but Ringke Fusion Magnetic adds a built-in magnetic ring. Thanks to it, you can use magnetic chargers, power banks, and car mounts — just like iPhone users.

Built-in MagSafe ring — compatibility with magnetic chargers and accessories
Transparent polycarbonate — resistant to yellowing
Raised edges around the screen and camera
Precise cutouts for USB-C and speakers

At 65 PLN, this is the most expensive case in the comparison, but the only transparent one with full MagSafe. If you plan to use wireless chargers or magnetic mounts, it’s the best choice.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU + polycarbonate
Type	Transparent
MagSafe	✅
Price	65 PLN

3. Tech-Protect Flexair Hybrid MagSafe — budget MagSafe (35 PLN)

Best price with MagSafe

Tech-Protect Flexair is half the price of Ringke, yet offers the same key features: a transparent hybrid with a built-in magnetic ring. The hybrid construction (TPU + PC) combines the flexibility of the frame with a hard, scratch-resistant back.

MagSafe — built-in magnetic ring
Hybrid TPU + PC — rigid back, flexible frame
Transparent — visible original color of the phone
Raised edges around the screen and camera

At 35 PLN, it offers the best price-to-functionality ratio in the comparison. If you want MagSafe for the Pixel 10a and don’t want to overpay, Tech-Protect Flexair is a perfect choice.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU + polycarbonate
Type	Transparent
MagSafe	✅
Price	35 PLN

4. 3MK Armor Case — armored protection (49.90 PLN)

3MK Armor Case is a rugged case with reinforced corners and a textured back that doesn’t slip from your hand. The design absorbs impacts more effectively than standard TPU cases.

Reinforced corners — enhanced protection during falls
Textured back — non-slip surface
Matte finish — does not collect fingerprints
Raised edges around the screen and camera

The plastic back of the Pixel 10a is particularly prone to scratches. The 3MK Armor Case ensures that even a fall on concrete won’t result in a crack. At 49.90 PLN, it’s a solid rugged case from a Polish brand.

Parameter	Value
Material	Reinforced TPU
Type	Armored
MagSafe	❌
Price	49.90 PLN

5. Bizon Case Salpa — the cheapest protection (25 PLN)

Lowest price

Flexible TPU case for 25 PLN. Bizon Case Salpa is a minimalist, transparent cover that protects against scratches and light falls. It lacks Air Cushion and MagSafe, but it does what it needs to do — at a minimal price.

Flexible TPU — easy to put on and take off
Transparent — visible design of the Pixel 10a
Raised edges around the screen
Slim profile — does not add unnecessary thickness

Perfect as a temporary case right after purchasing a phone or for those who do not need advanced protection. For 25 PLN, it’s hard to find a better option to start with.

Parameter	Value
Material	TPU
Type	Transparent, flexible
MagSafe	❌
Price	25 PLN

Comparison of cases for Pixel 10a

Case	Brand	Type	MagSafe	Feature	Price
Ultra Hybrid	Spigen	Transparent	❌	Air Cushion, top brand	59 PLN
Fusion Magnetic	Ringke	Transparent	✅	MagSafe + yellowing resistance	65 PLN
Flexair Hybrid	Tech-Protect	Transparent	✅	Cheapest MagSafe	35 PLN
Armor Case	3MK	Armored	❌	Reinforced corners	49.90 PLN
Salpa	Bizon	Flexible	❌	Lowest price	25 PLN

Our choice: Depends on the priority. MagSafe for cheap? Tech-Protect Flexair (35 PLN). Proven brand? Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN). Minimum expenses? Bizon Salpa (25 PLN).

Tempered glass for Pixel 10a

Pixel 10a has Gorilla Glass 7i on the front — it’s durable glass, but it’s not indestructible when dropped on concrete. Tempered glass adds a protective layer for a few dozen PLN.

Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ 2-pack (25 PLN) — two glasses in a set for the price of one from the competition. Compatible with Pixel 9a and 10a (same screen size). The black frame masks the edges and gives an elegant look. Best value in this category.

Ringke Tempered Glass 2-pack (39 zł) — premium option with an oleophobic coating (resistant to fingerprints) and a hardness of 9H. Two glasses in the set — one for now, the other as a spare.

3MK FlexibleGlass (34,90 zł) — hybrid glass that combines the flexibility of a film with the hardness of glass. It does not shatter upon impact like traditional tempered glass. One piece in the package.

Chargers and power banks for Pixel 10a

Pixel 10a supports 30W charging via cable (USB PD 3.0) and 10W wirelessly (Qi). To take advantage of the full charging speed, you need a USB PD charger with a minimum power of 30W.

Wall charger — look for models with USB-C PD 30W+. A GaN charger (gallium nitride) will be compact and efficient. Check wall chargers at homescreen.pl.

Power bank — minimum 10,000 mAh with USB-C PD. If you bought a case with MagSafe (e.g., Ringke or Tech-Protect), a magnetic power bank will stick to the phone and charge it wirelessly. Power banks at homescreen.pl.

USB-C Cable — The Pixel 10a has USB-C 3.2, so you need a USB-C to USB-C cable that supports PD 30W+. Most cables in the box are 2.0 versions — a 3.2 cable will be useful for data transfer.

FAQ — Frequently Asked Questions about Pixel 10a Accessories

Does the Pixel 10a support MagSafe?
Not natively. The Pixel 10a has Qi standard (10W), but not MagSafe or Qi2. Cases with a built-in magnetic ring (e.g., Ringke Fusion Magnetic, Tech-Protect Flexair MagSafe) add compatibility with MagSafe accessories.

Do cases from the Pixel 9a fit the Pixel 10a?
No. The Pixel 10a has different dimensions (153.9 x 73 x 9 mm) than the Pixel 9a. Cases are not interchangeable between models. Tempered glass may be compatible — e.g., Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ is labeled as “Pixel 9a / 10a”.

What charger for the Pixel 10a?
A USB-C charger with PD (Power Delivery) of at least 30W. This provides full charging speed — 50% battery in 30 minutes.

Is the Pixel 10a waterproof?
Yes, it has an IP68 rating — dustproof and waterproof up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. A case is not required for waterproofing, but it protects against scratches and drops.

Does the Pixel 10a have a glass back?
No. The Pixel 10a has a plastic back — this is one of the reasons why a case is particularly important. Plastic scratches more easily than glass and doesn’t look as good after a few months without protection.

How much do accessories for the Pixel 10a cost?
Cases range from 25 PLN (Bizon Salpa) to 65 PLN (Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe). Tempered glass ranges from 25 PLN (Tech-Protect 2-pack) to 39 PLN (Ringke 2-pack). A complete protection set (case + glass) can be purchased for 50–100 PLN.

Summary

The Pixel 10a is a great smartphone, but the plastic back needs protection. The good news is that accessories are cheap — you can buy a complete set (case + tempered glass) for just 50 PLN.

Key takeaways:

Best quality: Spigen Ultra Hybrid (59 PLN) — Air Cushion, transparent, trusted brand
Best with MagSafe: Ringke Fusion Magnetic (65 PLN) — magnetic ring + transparent
Best price-to-value ratio: Tech-Protect Flexair MagSafe (35 PLN) — MagSafe for half the price of Ringke
Rugged: 3MK Armor Case (49.90 PLN) — reinforced corners, Polish brand
Cheapest: Bizon Case Salpa (25 PLN) — minimum for minimum

Don’t forget about tempered glass — Tech-Protect Glass Fit+ for 25 PLN (2 pieces!) is an absolute must-have.

Check all accessories for Pixel 10a at homescreen.pl →

2026-03-12

iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra – which flagship to choose in 2026?

If you care about the Apple ecosystem, stability, and great video — the better choice will be the iPhone 17 Pro Max.

On the other hand, if you prioritize maximum specifications, a 200 MP camera, S Pen, and greater control over the system — the Galaxy S26 Ultra offers more technology.

6,299 PLN for the iPhone 17 Pro Max. 6,499 PLN for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. The difference? 200 PLN and two completely different ecosystems. On paper, both phones have 6.9-inch screens, flagship processors, and cameras that make DSLRs from a few years ago look pale in comparison. But the devil is in the details.

If you’re wondering which one will be your companion for the next 3-4 years, this article will help you make an informed decision.

📊 Specifications – iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Before we get into the details, here’s a comparison of the key parameters side by side:

Parameter	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Display	6.9″ OLED, 2868×1320, 460 ppi	6.9″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 498 ppi
Brightness	1000/1600/3000 nits	~1750/2600 nits
Processor	Apple A19 Pro	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
RAM	12 GB (unofficially)	12/16 GB
Storage	256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB / 2 TB	256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB
Main Camera	48 MP f/1.78	200 MP f/1.4
Ultrawide	48 MP f/2.2 (120°)	50 MP f/1.9
Telephoto	48 MP 4x f/2.8 (8x optical)	50 MP 5x + 10 MP 3x
Selfie	18 MP f/1.9	12 MP f/2.2
Video	4K Dolby Vision 120fps, ProRes	8K 30fps, 4K 120fps
Battery	4,823 mAh	5,000 mAh
Charging	40 W wired, 25 W MagSafe	60 W wired, 25 W Qi2.2
Dimensions	163.4 x 78.0 x 8.75 mm	163.6 x 78.1 x 7.90 mm
Weight	233 g	214 g
Protection	Ceramic Shield 2, IP68 (6 m)	Gorilla Armor, IP68
Material	Aluminum, Ceramic Shield	Titanium
System	iOS 26	Android 16 + One UI
S Pen / stylus	❌	✅
Price (256 GB)	6,299 zł	6,499 zł

At first glance, it’s clear: these are two different approaches to a flagship. Samsung focuses on camera resolution and faster charging, while Apple emphasizes the video ecosystem and memory capacity. Let’s get into the details.

⚡ Performance and Processor

A19 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

The iPhone 17 Pro Max is powered by Apple A19 Pro — a chip manufactured using a 2 nm process with a 6-core CPU and a 6-core GPU featuring hardware ray tracing. Samsung counters with the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 from Qualcomm, which Samsung uses in all regions (no more Exynos in Europe).

Benchmarks vs Reality

In Geekbench 6 tests, Samsung surprised: the Galaxy S26 Ultra scored 11,738 points in multi-core — about 20% more than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (~9,700 pts). Single-core? Samsung also leads with a score of 3,852 points.

Does this mean that Samsung is faster in everyday use? Not necessarily. iOS traditionally optimizes resources better, so an iPhone with less RAM (12 GB vs 16 GB in the top version of Samsung) can perform just as smoothly. The differences in benchmarks mainly translate to:

Video and 3D graphics rendering — here Samsung has a measurable advantage
Multitasking with multiple heavy applications — 16 GB of RAM gives Samsung a buffer
Everyday applications (social media, browser, maps) — both phones operate at the same speed

💡 Tip: If you are not rendering video on your phone and not playing the latest 3D games, you simply won’t notice any performance differences between these two flagships.

Display – iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Resolution, brightness, and screen features

The iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra offer large, 6.9-inch OLED displays with a refresh rate of 120 Hz. However, this is where the similarities between the screens of both flagships essentially end.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a higher screen resolution — 3120 × 1440 px (498 ppi), while iPhone 17 Pro Max offers 2868 × 1320 px (460 ppi). In practice, you will notice the difference in sharpness mainly when viewing text or images very closely. In everyday use, both displays are simply phenomenally sharp.

Where does the iPhone 17 Pro Max catch up? Screen brightness. Apple claims even up to 3000 nits at peak (e.g., in full sunlight) — this is one of the highest values on the smartphone market. Galaxy S26 Ultra reaches about 2600 nits, so in very bright conditions, the iPhone may be slightly more readable.

However, Samsung has something that we won’t find in the iPhone — the Privacy Display feature. This technology limits the screen viewing angle, so people sitting next to you on the bus or train won’t see your messages or banking app. In terms of privacy, this is a very practical solution.

Feature	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Resolution	2868×1320 (460 ppi)	3120×1440 (498 ppi)
Peak Brightness	3,000 nits	~2,600 nits
Privacy Display	❌	✅
Glass	Ceramic Shield 2	Gorilla Armor
Always-On Display	✅	✅

💡With such large and bright screens, it’s worth considering their protection — tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max and tempered glass for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra can be found at homescreen.pl

📸 Camera and Photography

This is where the most interesting part of the comparison begins. Both phones have camera systems that compete with compact cameras, but they approach photography from different angles.

Main Camera: 48 MP vs 200 MP

Samsung boasts a 200 MP with an aperture of f/1.4 — the brightest aperture in Galaxy history. It lets in 47% more light than the S25 Ultra (f/1.7). The iPhone responds with a “modest” 48 MP, but with optical sensor-shift stabilization.

Is 200 MP better than 48 MP? By default, both phones take pictures at ~12 MP (through pixel binning). Samsung wins in situations where you want to pull out detail — the full 200 MP provides huge files for cropping. The iPhone focuses on color consistency across all three lenses.

Zoom: periscope system

Zoom	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Ultrawide	48 MP, 0.5x	50 MP, 0.6x
Main	48 MP, 1x-2x	200 MP, 1x
Telephoto #1	—	10 MP, 3x
Telephoto #2	48 MP, 4x (8x optical)	50 MP, 5x
Max digital zoom	40x	100x (Space Zoom AI)

Samsung offers two telephoto lenses (3x and 5x), providing greater flexibility. The iPhone has one 4x telephoto lens, but with the ability to crop to 8x without loss of quality (thanks to the 48 MP sensor). In practice, both systems deliver excellent results up to ~10x zoom. Above that, Samsung leads with its 100x Space Zoom supported by AI.

Selfies and Portrait Mode

The iPhone wins in selfies — 18 MP with autofocus and Center Stage vs 12 MP on Samsung. Center Stage automatically crops the shot, tracking your face during video calls. Samsung has HDR10+ in selfies, but with lower resolution.

🎬 Video and Filming

This is a category where the iPhone traditionally dominates — and the 17 Pro Max maintains this position.

iPhone 17 Pro Max records 4K Dolby Vision up to 120 fps and supports ProRes — a format used in professional post-production. Slow-motion in 4K at 120 fps is a quality that just 3 years ago required a camera costing several thousand zlotys. Additionally, Spatial Video for Apple Vision Pro.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra records 8K at 30 fps — higher resolution on paper, but 30 fps limits smoothness. In 4K, Samsung offers up to 120 fps, which levels the playing field. However, there is no equivalent to ProRes — Samsung’s files are compressed.

Feature	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Max resolution	4K 120 fps (Dolby Vision)	8K 30 fps
ProRes / pro format	✅ ProRes 4K 120 fps	❌
Slow-motion	4K 120fps, 1080p 240fps	4K 120fps, 1080p 240fps
Spatial Video	✅	❌
Stabilization	Sensor-shift OIS	OIS

Verdict: If filming is a priority for you, the iPhone has no competition in the smartphone segment. If you mainly record short clips for social media, both phones perform excellently.

🔋 Battery and Charging

Battery capacity and charging speed

Samsung has a larger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,823 mAh), but the iPhone compensates with better energy optimization. Apple claims 39 hours of video playback for the Pro Max — one of the best results on the market.

Where does Samsung clearly win? Wired charging.

Charging	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Wired	40 W (50% in 20 min)	60 W (75% in 30 min)
Wireless	25 W (MagSafe/Qi2)	25 W (Qi2.2)
Reverse charging	✅ (MagSafe)	✅ (4.5 W)

Samsung charges significantly faster via wired — 60 W vs 40 W. If you forgot to charge your phone overnight, Samsung will get back to 75% in half an hour. The iPhone takes longer, although 50% in 20 minutes is still a decent result.

Wireless charging is a tie — 25 W on both sides. Both support reverse charging (charging headphones or a watch from the phone).

🤖 AI and Software

This is a category that in 2026 becomes one of the most important differentiators. Both phones offer advanced AI features, but in different styles.

Apple Intelligence

Apple Intelligence operates deeply within iOS 26. Key features:

Siri with context — understands what is on the screen, continues the conversation, executes complex commands
Writing tools — summarization, tone correction, rewriting text in any application
Genmoji — generating personalized emojis from a description
Image Playground — creating AI images in illustration style
Notification prioritization — AI sorts notifications by importance

Galaxy AI

Samsung Galaxy AI in S26 Ultra offers:

Real-time conversation translation — during phone calls, without internet
Circle to Search — circle anything on the screen to search for it
Generative Edit — filling in photo fragments with AI-generated content
Note Assist — note summaries, transcription of recordings
Privacy Display AI — intelligent dimming of the screen when someone is looking from the side

Updates — how many years of support?

Here is the key difference. Apple traditionally supports iPhones for 6-7 years of iOS updates. Samsung promises 7 years of system and security updates starting with the S24 series — matching Apple.

In practice, both phones purchased today will receive updates until 2032-2033. This means that an investment of ~6,300 PLN is spread over at least 7 years of support.

💰 Price and Value for Money

How much does the iPhone 17 Pro Max cost vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

Variant	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
256 GB	6,299 PLN	6,499 PLN
512 GB	7,299 PLN	7,499 PLN
1 TB	8,299 PLN	9,499 PLN
2 TB	10,299 PLN	❌ not available

iPhone 17 Pro Max is about 200 PLN cheaper than the Galaxy S26 Ultra in every memory variant. In practice, this means that regardless of the chosen version — 256 GB, 512 GB, or 1 TB — the Apple smartphone remains slightly more affordable.

Additionally, Apple is the only one offering a variant with as much as 2 TB of memory, which we won’t find in the Galaxy S26 Ultra. This can be especially significant for those recording a lot of high-quality video or photographers working with ProRAW and ProRes files, which can take up a lot of space.

💡 Tip: If 256 GB turns out to be too little, and 1 TB too much, the best compromise for most users will be the 512 GB variant. In both models, it costs around 7,300–7,500 PLN and offers enough space for photos, videos, and applications for several years of use.

iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra – summary

Which flagship will be the better choice?

After analyzing 8 categories, there is no clear winner. Both phones are phenomenal, but they target different users.

If you plan to purchase one of these flagships, it’s worth thinking about protection right away — a good case for the iPhone 17 Pro Max or case for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra will help secure the phone from the very first day of use.

iPhone 17 Pro Max — for whom?

Filmmakers and video creators — ProRes, Dolby Vision 4K 120fps, Spatial Video
Apple ecosystem users — Mac, iPad, AirPods, Apple Watch, Vision Pro
People valuing long-term value — iPhones hold their value longer in the secondary market
Photographers needing large storage — 2 TB option
People preferring simplicity — iOS is less customizable but more consistent

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — for whom?

S Pen users — notes, drawing, precise control
Photographers focusing on zoom — 100x Space Zoom, two telephoto lenses
People who value fast charging — 60 W wired
Multitaskers — DeX, split windows, 16 GB RAM
People who value screen privacy — Privacy Display is a unique feature

If you already have an iPhone or Samsung…

Changing ecosystems is not just about getting a new phone — it’s about changing your watch, headphones, subscriptions, and habits. If you’ve been in the Apple or Samsung ecosystem for years, switching to the other side is rarely worthwhile. Choose a newer model within your ecosystem.

Are you buying your first flagship? Check out both in the store. Hold them in your hand. See which interface feels more intuitive to you. For around 6,300-6,500 PLN, you can’t go wrong with either of them.

Regardless of whether you choose an iPhone or Samsung, it’s worth taking care of the right accessories right away — especially screen protection, a case, and a good charger. If you’re looking for proven models, check out our rankings and guides:

– Best tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max →
– Top 10 cases for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra →
– What charger for iPhone 17? →
– Best charger for Samsung Galaxy S25 →

FAQ – frequently asked questions

How much does the iPhone 17 Pro Max cost in Poland?
The iPhone 17 Pro Max starts at 6,299 PLN for the 256 GB version. The 512 GB variant costs 7,299 PLN, 1 TB — 8,299 PLN, and 2 TB — 10,299 PLN.

When is the release of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was released in the first quarter of 2026. The phone has been available in Polish stores since February 2026.

Which has a better camera — iPhone 17 Pro Max or Galaxy S26 Ultra?
It depends on the use case. Samsung excels in photography with high zoom (100x Space Zoom) and has a brighter main lens (f/1.4). The iPhone has better color consistency between lenses and dominates in video recording (ProRes, Dolby Vision 4K 120fps).

Which has longer update support?
Both offer 7 years of system and security updates. The iPhone 17 Pro Max will be supported until ~2032, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra — until ~2033.

Is it worth waiting for the S26 Ultra, or should I buy the S25 Ultra cheaper?
The S26 Ultra offers several significant upgrades: a brighter f/1.4 lens (vs f/1.7), Privacy Display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and next-generation Galaxy AI. If you find the S25 Ultra at a good price (below 5,000 PLN), it is still an excellent phone. But if you are buying for the next 3-4 years — the S26 Ultra is a better investment.

iPhone 17 Pro Max or Galaxy S26 Ultra — which is lighter?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra weighs 214 g — 19 g less than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 g). Samsung is also slimmer: 7.9 mm vs 8.75 mm.

2026-03-11

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Galaxy Buds 3 Pro – comparison

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are the latest wireless headphones from Samsung with Adaptive ANC 2.0, Bluetooth 6.1, and a weight of 5.1 g. Compared to Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, they offer better noise cancellation, longer battery life in tests, and head gesture support. They cost 1099 PLN compared to about 650-899 PLN for the older model. Which one to choose? Below is a detailed comparison.

Samsung presented the Samsung Buds 4 Pro on February 25, 2026, and sales in Poland started on March 11. This is the direct successor to the Samsung Buds 3 Pro from July 2024. Both Samsung headphone models have a dual-driver system (dynamic + planar), ANC, and IP57 water resistance, but differ in several significant aspects.

Looking for a case or accessories for your headphones? Check out accessories for Galaxy Buds 4 and 4 Pro and accessories for Galaxy Buds 3 and 3 Pro.

📊 Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro Specification

Parameter	Galaxy Buds 4 Pro	Galaxy Buds 3 Pro
Release	March 2026	July 2024
Low-frequency driver	11 mm dynamic	10.5 mm dynamic
High-frequency driver	5.4 mm planar	6.1 mm planar
ANC	Adaptive ANC 2.0	Adaptive ANC
Bluetooth	6.1	5.4
Codecs	SBC, AAC, LC3, SSC, SSC UHQ	SBC, AAC, LC3, SSC, SSC UHQ
Battery (earbud)	61 mAh	53 mAh
Battery (case)	530 mAh	515 mAh
Playback time (ANC on)	up to 6 h (tested: 6 h 1 min)	up to 6 h (tested: 4 h 31 min)
Playback time with case (ANC on)	up to 26 h	up to 26 h
Playback time (ANC off)	up to 7 h	up to 7 h
Playback time with case (ANC off)	up to 30 h	up to 30 h
Weight (earbud)	5.1 g	5.4 g
Weight (case)	approx. 44.3 g	46.5 g
Water resistance	IP57	IP57
Head gestures	yes (answer/reject calls)	no
Voice assistant	Gemini + Bixby simultaneously	Bixby or Google Assistant
Super Clear Call (SWB)	yes (with Galaxy S26)	no
Microphones	6 (including VPU)	6
Charging	USB-C + Qi wireless	USB-C + Qi wireless
Colors	Black, White, Pink Gold	Silver, White
Price in Poland	1099 PLN	1029 PLN (launch) / from approx. 650 PLN (current)

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro - three color variants (pink, white, black) in open cases

🔊 Sound quality of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro

Both models of Samsung in-ear headphones have a dual-driver system, but in the Buds 4 Pro, Samsung replaced both.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a larger 11 mm woofer (vs 10.5 mm). In practice, this provides about 20% more diaphragm area, resulting in deeper, more controlled bass. Reviewers from SoundGuys and What Hi-Fi describe the sound as energetic yet precise, with better instrument separation.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, on the other hand, have a larger 6.1 mm planar tweeter (vs 5.4 mm in Buds 4 Pro). Theoretically, this should provide an advantage in high frequencies, but tests show that the Buds 3 Pro tended to have overly strong bass that “bled” into the mids.

Audio codecs

Both models support the same codecs: SBC, AAC, LC3, and Samsung Seamless Codec (SSC UHQ) with a resolution of up to 24 bit/96 kHz. Neither supports LDAC or aptX. SSC UHQ requires a Samsung Galaxy S23 or newer smartphone with One UI 6.1.1+.

This means that you will only get the full sound quality with a Samsung smartphone. With an iPhone or phones from other brands, these Samsung wireless headphones are limited to AAC, which is a noticeable loss of quality compared to SSC UHQ.

Tuning and sound character

The Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a slightly darker tuning with less emphasis on the high frequencies. The bass is deep but does not dominate the rest of the range. The mid frequencies (vocals, acoustic instruments) sound cleaner than in the predecessor.

The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have a brighter tuning with more detail in the high frequencies. The soundstage is slightly wider, but the bass can be too expansive, which in some genres (e.g., EDM, hip-hop) leads to “muddiness” in the low frequencies.

The Buds 4 Pro win in sound quality. Better controlled bass, cleaner mid frequencies, and generally a more balanced presentation. The difference is not revolutionary, but it is noticeable.

🔇 ANC: Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro

This is one of the biggest leaps between generations of these Samsung headphones.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro feature Adaptive ANC 2.0, which monitors the environment in real-time and adjusts the noise cancellation to specific frequencies. In SoundGuys tests, these Samsung wireless earbuds reduced around 84% of ambient noise, placing them on par with AirPods Pro 3.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have first-generation Adaptive ANC, which operates based on programmed algorithms. It still provides effective noise reduction, but does not respond as dynamically to changing conditions.

The biggest improvement is seen in the range below 1 kHz, where the noise from air conditioning, fans, and street traffic resides. Both models struggle with sudden loud sounds.

Ambient Mode and Voice Detection

Both Samsung earbuds have:
– Voice Detection: automatic switching to ambient mode when you start speaking
– Ambient Mode: allowing sounds from the environment
– Adaptive EQ: adjustment to the shape of the ear

In ambient mode, Buds 4 Pro sound a bit more natural. The sounds from the environment do not have the “metallic” aftertaste that sometimes appeared in Buds 3 Pro. This is important if you use ambient mode on a daily basis (e.g., in the office).

Buds 4 Pro win this category. Adaptive ANC 2.0 is a real improvement, not a marketing slogan.

🎙️ Call Quality

Here the difference is most apparent and concerns both sides of the connection.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have 6 microphones with a VPU (Voice Pickup Unit) sensor, meaning bone conduction. Additionally, they feature Super Clear Call technology with a bandwidth of 16 kHz (Super Wideband), but only when paired with the Galaxy S26.

In a quiet environment, the voice sounds clear and natural. In noise, the microphone performs well, although there is a slight “digitalization” of the voice. The VPU captures vibrations from the jawbone, which helps isolate the voice from background noise.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro also have 6 microphones, but without the VPU sensor. They support AI noise cancellation, but reviewers rated the call quality as “below average,” especially in loud environments.

Super Clear Call is an exclusive feature of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro that doubles the voice bandwidth (from 8 kHz to 16 kHz). In practice, the caller hears you more clearly, and your voice sounds more natural. However, this requires the Galaxy S26, S26+, or S26 Ultra.

Winner: Buds 4 Pro. VPU and Super Clear Call are noticeable improvements, especially for those who make a lot of phone calls.

🔋 Samsung Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro Battery

On paper, both models look identical: 6 hours with ANC, 7 hours without ANC, 26/30 hours with the case. But tests from independent publications paint a different picture.

Parameter	Buds 4 Pro (test)	Buds 3 Pro (test)
ANC on (SoundGuys)	6 h 1 min	4 h 31 min
Headphone capacity	61 mAh	53 mAh
Case capacity	530 mAh	515 mAh

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro with a 61 mAh battery (15% more than Buds 3 Pro) achieved exactly 6 hours and 1 minute in SoundGuys tests with ANC on. This result is close to the manufacturer’s claims.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro with a 53 mAh battery lasted only 4 hours and 31 minutes in the same tests, which is 25% less than the claimed 6 hours.

Both models charge via USB-C and wirelessly (Qi). Samsung does not provide exact charging times, but in practice, fully charging the case with a cable takes about 1.5 hours. The earbuds themselves charge to full in about 50-60 minutes while in the case.

Battery: Advantage Buds 4 Pro. An hour and a half longer battery life in real conditions is a significant difference, especially during travel or long workouts.

🎨 Design and Comfort

Samsung has changed its approach to design in the Buds 4 Pro, focusing on premium materials.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have metal (aluminum) stems with a matte finish and delicate touch grooves. The case is flat, horizontal, with a transparent cover through which the earbuds are visible. Weighing 5.1 g per earbud makes them one of the lighter in this class.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have plastic stems with a backlit LED strip that lights up during pairing and notifications. The case is vertical, traditional, without a transparent cover. Weighing 5.4 g per earbud.

Fit and Ear Tips

The difference of 0.3 g per earbud sounds like nothing, but it matters during hours of wear. Both models come with 4 sizes of silicone ear tips (XS, S, M, L). Samsung claims that the Buds 4 Pro were designed based on the analysis of 100 million ear scans and 10,000 virtual simulations.

In practice, both models sit securely in the ear and are suitable for running and exercising. The IP57 certification means protection against dust and immersion in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes, which is sufficient for sweating during workouts.

Available colors:
– Buds 4 Pro: Black, White, Pink Gold
– Buds 3 Pro: Silver, White

A tie with a slight advantage for Buds 4 Pro. The aluminum stems look premium, and the lighter weight improves comfort. But if you like the LED on the stems of Buds 3 Pro, it’s a matter of taste.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro in silver - a pair of in-ear headphones

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro - charging case with a transparent lid

📱 Smart features and Samsung ecosystem

Head gestures (only Buds 4 Pro)

A new feature exclusive to Samsung Buds 4 Pro: nodding your head answers a call, shaking your head rejects it. Works only with Samsung phones. A small but useful novelty when your hands are busy while cooking, training, or cycling.

Voice assistant

Buds 4 Pro support both Gemini and Bixby simultaneously: you say “Hey Google” or “Hey Bixby” without needing to select in settings. Buds 3 Pro require choosing one assistant (Bixby, Google Assistant, or Siri).

Having a dual assistant means you can use Gemini for questions and searches, and Bixby for controlling your Samsung phone settings. It’s a convenient solution for Galaxy ecosystem users.

Spatial Audio and 360 Audio

Both Samsung headphone models support spatial audio with head tracking. The effect is most noticeable when watching movies on the Samsung Galaxy Tab. In music, Spatial Audio can be controversial as it widens the soundstage at the expense of precision.

Other Common Features

Both models have:
– Real-Time Interpreter: real-time conversation translation (requires Galaxy AI)
– Auracast: audio sharing via Bluetooth LE Audio (e.g., sharing music with a friend)
– SmartThings Find: locating lost earbuds
– Adapt Sound: sound personalization based on hearing tests
– Dialogue Boost: enhancing dialogues in movies and podcasts
– Fall Detection: automatic notification to emergency contacts

Compatibility with Phones

These Samsung earbuds work with both Android and iOS. However, you will only fully utilize their capabilities (SSC UHQ, head gestures, Super Clear Call, Galaxy AI) with a Samsung smartphone.

With an iPhone, you lose: head gestures, Super Clear Call, SSC UHQ codec, SmartThings Find, and automatic pairing. You are left with AAC, basic ANC, and touch controls. If you have an iPhone, consider AirPods Pro 3 as an alternative.

💰 Price of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro in Poland

Model	Launch Price	Current Price (March 2026)
Galaxy Buds 4 Pro	1099 PLN	1099 PLN
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro	1029 PLN	from approx. 650 PLN

This is the most important difference in this comparison. Samsung Buds 3 Pro, which launched at 1029 PLN, can now be purchased for 650-899 PLN (depending on the store and promotions). Galaxy Buds 4 Pro cost 1099 PLN without discounts.

The difference between the launch prices is only 70 PLN. But between the current price of Buds 3 Pro and Buds 4 Pro, it is even 200-450 PLN.

The question then comes down to: is Adaptive ANC 2.0, better battery performance in tests, head gestures, and Bluetooth 6.1 worth the extra 200-450 PLN?

If you are buying Samsung earbuds for several years and care about the best ANC and calls, the answer is yes. If you are looking for good value for money, Buds 3 Pro for 650-700 PLN are still great wireless earbuds from Samsung.

In Europe, the price of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro is 249 euros, which is identical to the launch price of Buds 3 Pro. In the USA, both models were priced at 249.99 USD, but Buds 3 Pro can now be purchased for about 170-190 USD.

🆚 Who should choose which Samsung earbuds?

Choose Galaxy Buds 4 Pro if:

You care about the best ANC in the Samsung ecosystem
You make a lot of phone calls
You have a Galaxy S26 (Super Clear Call)
You want head gestures and dual assistant (Gemini + Bixby)
You bought a Samsung phone in 2026 and want a complete set

Choose Galaxy Buds 3 Pro if:

You want to save 200-450 PLN
You don’t need the latest ANC
Sound is more important than call quality
You are looking for solid wireless earbuds at a good price
You have an older Samsung phone (Buds 3 Pro work great anyway)

Do you need a case for your earbuds? Check out accessories for Galaxy Buds 4 and 4 Pro or Galaxy Buds 3 and 3 Pro in our store.

❓ FAQ

Do Galaxy Buds 4 Pro work with iPhone?

Yes. Buds 4 Pro connect to iOS via Bluetooth, but you lose features exclusive to Samsung: head gestures, Super Clear Call, Gemini/Bixby, SmartThings Find, and automatic pairing.

Do Galaxy Buds 3 Pro support LDAC?

No. Neither the Buds 3 Pro nor the Buds 4 Pro support the LDAC codec. Both models use Samsung Seamless Codec (SSC UHQ) offering quality up to 24 bit/96 kHz, but only with Samsung smartphones.

Do Buds 4 Pro have better sound than Buds 3 Pro?

Yes, but the difference is not drastic. The Buds 4 Pro have better-controlled bass and clearer mid-tones thanks to a larger 11 mm driver. In blind tests, audiophiles will mainly notice the difference.

Is it worth buying Buds 3 Pro in 2026?

Yes. For 650-700 PLN, they are one of the best wireless headphones from Samsung with ANC, planar sound, and IP57. The price drop after the release of Buds 4 Pro makes them a great deal.

How much do Galaxy Buds 4 Pro cost in Poland?

The launch price of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro in Poland is 1099 PLN. They are available in three colors: Black, White, and Pink Gold.

Do Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have noise cancellation?

Yes. The Buds 4 Pro feature Adaptive ANC 2.0, which is next-generation active noise cancellation that monitors the environment in real-time and adjusts the attenuation to specific frequencies.

What is the difference between Galaxy Buds 4 Pro and regular Galaxy Buds 4?

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a dual-driver system (dynamic + planar), Adaptive ANC 2.0, Bluetooth 6.1, and VPU. Regular Galaxy Buds 4 have a single driver, basic ANC, and Bluetooth 5.4. The price difference is about 400 PLN.

Summary

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are an evolution, not a revolution, compared to Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. The most important upgrades are Adaptive ANC 2.0 (realistically better noise cancellation), Bluetooth 6.1, head gestures, dual AI assistant, and better battery in tests (6 h vs 4.5 h with ANC).

Is it worth the extra cost? At the full launch price (1099 vs 1029 PLN), the answer is: yes. At the current price of Buds 3 Pro (about 650-700 PLN), the decision is more difficult, because for almost half the price you get 80-90% of the experience.

Our verdict: Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are the best earbuds Samsung has ever made. But if your budget is limited, Galaxy Buds 3 Pro for 650-700 PLN is one of the best deals on the wireless earbuds market in 2026.

Check out Samsung headphone accessories in our store. And if you’re also planning a new phone, make sure to take care of its proper protection – check outcases for Galaxy S26 Ultra and glass for Galaxy S26 Ultra, which will protect the body and screen from damage.

2026-03-10