Author: Dawid Cylke

The dilemma of POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max is one of the hottest smartphone comparisons of 2026. Both models debuted in March and immediately sparked huge interest — they offer AMOLED displays with a brightness of 3,500 nits, IP68/IP69K protection, and 100 W charging. The key difference? Processor, battery, and camera. POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, while POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN. Below you will find a detailed comparison to help you choose the right model.

Technical specifications — POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max

Before we move on to a detailed analysis, it’s worth looking at the full specifications of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in one place. The table below shows the key differences between both models.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Display	6.59″ AMOLED, 1.5K	6.83″ AMOLED, 1.5K
Brightness	3,500 nits (peak)	3,500 nits (peak)
Refresh Rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Processor	MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra (4 nm)	MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (3 nm)
AnTuTu v11	2,283,558	3,085,998
RAM / Storage	8/256 GB or 12/512 GB	12/256 GB or 12/512 GB
Main Camera	50 MP, Sony IMX882, OIS	50 MP, Light Fusion 600, OIS
Battery	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
Operating System	Android 16, HyperOS 3	Android 16, HyperOS 3
Resistance	IP68 / IP69K	IP68 / IP69K
Weight	201.5 g	218 g
Fingerprint Reader	Optical (under display)	Ultrasonic (under display)
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
eSIM	No	Yes
Price from	1,399 PLN	1,799 PLN

Display — bigger doesn’t always mean better

Both the POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max feature 1.5K AMOLED displays with a 120 Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 3,500 nits. They support Dolby Vision and HDR10+, resulting in excellent color reproduction while watching movies.

The main difference is size — the POCO X8 Pro has a 6.59-inch display, while the POCO X8 Pro Max offers 6.83 inches. Both models are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i and have TÜV Rheinland certifications (Low Blue Light, Flicker Free).

Tip: If you value compactness and one-handed use, the POCO X8 Pro will be more comfortable. For fans of large displays — the X8 Pro Max with its 6.83-inch panel is a better choice for movies and games.

The touch sampling rate is 480 Hz (Game Turbo) in both models, and PWM dimming operates at 3,840 Hz — this is important for those sensitive to screen flicker.

Processor and performance — this is where the POCO X8 Pro Max excels

This is one of the biggest differences when comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8500-Ultra in a 4-nanometer manufacturing process, while the Pro Max received the flagship Dimensity 9500s made in a 3 nm process.

The performance difference is clear — the POCO X8 Pro score in AnTuTu v11 is 2,283,558 points, while the POCO X8 Pro Max reaches 3,085,998 in AnTuTu:

Test	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max	Difference
AnTuTu v11	2,283,558	3,085,998	+35%
Manufacturing process	4 nm (TSMC)	3 nm	Newer
GPU	Mali-G720 MC8	Immortalis-G925 MC12	Higher class

The Dimensity 9500s in the POCO X8 Pro Max is a flagship segment chip — the same processor can be found in phones costing over 3,000 PLN. The Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU provides smooth gameplay even in the most demanding mobile games, such as Genshin Impact or Honkai: Star Rail at the highest settings.

POCO X8 Pro with Dimensity 8500-Ultra also performs very well in everyday use — multitasking, social media, and gaming at medium settings are not a problem. However, in benchmarks and intensive games, the 35% difference in favor of the Max model is noticeable.

Both smartphones feature the POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system with a surface area of 5,300 mm², which effectively dissipates heat during longer gaming sessions.

It is worth mentioning that both models support 5G network (SA/NSA) — this is the standard in 2026, but still an important parameter when choosing a new smartphone. The RAM in both cases is LPDDR5X, and the internal storage is UFS 4.1 — the fastest available standards in the mid-premium segment.

Camera — Light Fusion 600 vs Sony IMX882

Both models have a main camera of 50 MP with optical image stabilization (OIS), but the sensors used differ significantly.

POCO X8 Pro uses the Sony IMX882 — a proven sensor with a size of 1/1.95 inches and 0.8 μm pixels. It is a solid sensor that performs well in daylight and well-lit scenes.

POCO X8 Pro Max received the newer Light Fusion 600 with 1.6 μm pixels — twice as large as those in the X8 Pro. The Dual Native ISO Fusion technology improves dynamic range and significantly enhances photo quality in low light. In practice, this means less noise in night photos and better details in shadows.

The remaining elements of the camera set are identical:
– Ultra-wide angle — 8 MP, f/2.2
– Front — 20 MP, f/2.2
– Video recording — 4K at 30/60 fps, slow motion 960 fps

Tip: If you often take photos in the evening or in poorly lit interiors, the POCO X8 Pro Max with the Light Fusion 600 sensor will be a noticeably better choice.

Battery and charging — 6,500 vs 8,500 mAh

This is another category where the POCO X8 Pro Max clearly dominates. The 8,500 mAh battery (silicon-carbon technology) is 30% more than the 6,500 mAh in the Pro model.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Capacity	6,500 mAh	8,500 mAh
Wired charging	100 W HyperCharge	100 W HyperCharge
Reverse charging	27 W	27 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Battery life	≥80% after 1,600 cycles	≥80% after 1,600 cycles

In practice, the POCO X8 Pro Max easily lasts two full days of moderate use, and with light usage, even three days. The POCO X8 Pro comfortably provides a full day even with intensive use.

Both models charge at a power of 100 W — the POCO X8 Pro Max recovers 50% of energy in about 24 minutes, and a full charge takes just over 50 minutes. Neither model supports wireless charging.

If you are looking for a fast wall charger that supports 100 W, it’s worth choosing a model with USB Power Delivery (fast charging standard) or a dedicated Xiaomi charger. A compact power bank with the appropriate output power will also be useful for daily charging on the go.

Construction and design — aluminum, glass, and IP69K

Both smartphones have aluminum frames, Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the front, and an IP68/IP69K certification — they can withstand immersion in water as well as a stream of hot water under pressure. This is rare in this price range. Despite their durability, it’s worth protecting the display — screen protectors will provide additional protection against scratches in everyday use.

Parameter	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
Dimensions	157.5 × 75.2 × 8.4 mm	162.9 × 77.9 × 8.2 mm
Weight	201.5 g	218 g
Back cover	Glass	Fiberglass
SIM	Dual nano-SIM	Dual nano-SIM + eSIM
RGB backlight	8 colors	8 colors
Colors	Black, White, Mint Green	Black, White, Blue

POCO X8 Pro is lighter by 16.5 g and slightly narrower — it fits better in the hand and fits into narrower pockets. The Max model is slimmer (8.2 vs 8.4 mm), but larger and heavier due to the bigger battery and display.

It’s worth mentioning that the POCO X8 Pro is also available in a limited Iron Man edition (12/512 GB) for 1,749 PLN on promotion — this is a variant for Marvel fans.

Regardless of the chosen model, it’s good to invest in a suitable case for the POCO smartphone that will protect the aluminum frame and glass or fiberglass back from mechanical damage.

Connectivity — Wi-Fi 7 and eSIM only in the Max model

In terms of connectivity, the POCO X8 Pro Max offers several significant improvements:

• Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) instead of Wi-Fi 6 — faster transfer and lower latency
• eSIM — a convenient solution while traveling, without the need to swap physical SIM cards
• Bluetooth 5.4 with Auracast — wireless audio sharing to multiple headphones simultaneously
• Symmetrical stereo speakers — better sound than the standard stereo speakers in the X8 Pro

POCO X8 Pro 5G and POCO X8 Pro Max 5G support both SA and NSA modes. Other common connectivity features include NFC, infrared port (IR blaster), USB-C 2.0, GPS L1+L5, and Dolby Atmos with Hi-Res Audio (24-bit/192 kHz). Neither model has a 3.5 mm headphone jack — if you prefer wireless audio, check out Bluetooth headphones compatible with both smartphones.

Security and Software

Both smartphones run on Android 16 with HyperOS 3 and will receive 4 years of system updates and 6 years of security patches. They also have access to Google Gemini, Circle to Search, and AI tools (AI Writing, AI Speech).

The key difference concerns the fingerprint reader:

• POCO X8 Pro — optical reader under the screen
• POCO X8 Pro Max — ultrasonic reader under the screen

The ultrasonic reader works faster, is more precise, and recognizes the finger even when wet — this is a clear advantage of the Max model.

POCO X8 Pro Max also offers the Xiaomi Offline Communication feature with a range of up to 500 m — it allows communication with other Xiaomi devices without access to the internet or cellular network.

Price of POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max in Poland

How much do these smartphones cost? The price of POCO X8 Pro starts at 1,399 PLN, and the price of POCO X8 Pro Max starts at 1,799 PLN in the promotional launch (until March 31, 2026):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1,399 PLN (only mi.com)	—
12/256 GB	—	1,799 PLN (only mi.com)
12/512 GB	1,599 PLN	1,999 PLN
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1,749 PLN	—

Regular prices (after promotion):

Variant	POCO X8 Pro	POCO X8 Pro Max
8/256 GB	1,699 zł	—
12/256 GB	—	2,099 zł
12/512 GB	1,899 zł	2,299 zł
Iron Man 12/512 GB	1,999 zł	—

The difference of 400 zł between comparable variants (12/512 GB) is a reasonable surcharge for the flagship processor, larger battery, better camera, and Wi-Fi 7. You can find current prices and availability on the official POCO website.

Gaming performance — how do they perform in practice?

Simply comparing AnTuTu scores does not provide the full picture. In everyday use, both smartphones perform excellently — apps open instantly, multitasking works smoothly, and scrolling through the interface is fluid at 120 Hz.

The difference becomes noticeable in demanding mobile games. The POCO X8 Pro Max with the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU maintains a stable 60 fps in Genshin Impact at the highest graphics settings, while the POCO X8 Pro with the Mali-G720 MC8 requires lowering some options to medium to maintain fluidity. In less demanding titles — PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, or Honkai: Star Rail — both models run smoothly at high settings.

The POCO 3D IceLoop cooling system works effectively in both cases. After a 30-minute session of Genshin Impact, the casing temperatures remain within a comfortable range. The POCO X8 Pro Max has a slight advantage here due to its larger casing, which dissipates heat better.

For casual gamers, the POCO X8 Pro will be more than sufficient. However, if you regularly play the most demanding titles and care about maximum graphic settings, the Dimensity 9500s in the Max model is a safer choice for the years to come.

POCO X8 Pro Max vs competition — how does it compare to rivals?

It is worth looking at both POCO models in the context of the market. In the price range of 1,400–2,300 PLN, the competition is significant:

• Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (~1,699 PLN) — better Samsung ecosystem, longer support (7 years of updates), but noticeably weaker Exynos 1580 processor and smaller 5,000 mAh battery. The POCO X8 Pro offers more performance for a similar price.
• Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (~1,599 PLN) — a close relative from the Xiaomi family. Similar specifications to the POCO X8 Pro, but slightly weaker Dimensity 8400-Ultra and smaller 6,200 mAh battery. POCO stands out with an IP69K certification.
• Nothing Phone (3a) (~1,799 PLN) — distinguished by its Glyph lighting design, pure Android, but weaker processor and smaller battery. A choice for those who prioritize aesthetics.
• Motorola Edge 60 (~1,899 PLN) — a competitor with wireless charging, which is lacking in POCO. However, it falls short in performance compared to the POCO X8 Pro Max.

POCO X8 Pro Max priced at 1,999 PLN (12/512 GB) offers performance comparable to smartphones costing over 3,000 PLN — Samsung Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, or Xiaomi 15. This is its biggest competitive advantage.

Summary of differences — who wins in each category?

Category	Winner	Why?
Display	POCO X8 Pro Max	Larger 6.83″ panel
Performance	POCO X8 Pro Max	Dimensity 9500s, +35% in AnTuTu
Camera	POCO X8 Pro Max	Light Fusion 600, better night photos
Battery	POCO X8 Pro Max	8,500 vs 6,500 mAh
Compactness	POCO X8 Pro	Lighter (201.5 g), narrower
Price	POCO X8 Pro	From 1,399 PLN
Connectivity	POCO X8 Pro Max	Wi-Fi 7, eSIM, Auracast
Biometrics	POCO X8 Pro Max	Ultrasonic reader

POCO X8 Pro Max wins in six out of eight categories — but POCO X8 Pro stands its ground with its price and compact dimensions.

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — which model to choose in 2026?

The choice between POCO X8 Pro and POCO X8 Pro Max depends on your priorities and budget.

Choose POCO X8 Pro if:
– You are looking for the best value for money under 1,700 PLN
– You prefer a compact and lighter smartphone (201.5 g vs 218 g)
– You don’t need flagship performance — Dimensity 8500-Ultra is more than enough for everyday tasks
– You are interested in the limited Iron Man edition

Choose POCO X8 Pro Max if:
– You want a flagship Dimensity 9500s processor with performance comparable to phones costing over 3,000 PLN
– You care about the longest battery life — 8,500 mAh lasts 2–3 days without charging
– You take a lot of photos in low light — Light Fusion 600 makes a noticeable difference
– You need eSIM or Wi-Fi 7
– You value a faster and more accurate ultrasonic fingerprint reader

Our verdict: For an additional 400 PLN, POCO X8 Pro Max offers significantly more — a flagship processor, a huge battery, and a better camera. It is one of the best smartphones in terms of price to performance ratio in 2026. However, if compactness and a lower price are priorities, POCO X8 Pro remains an excellent choice.

In summary, comparing POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — both smartphones offer excellent value, but the Max model targets users who want flagship performance without the flagship price.

Are you looking for accessories for your new POCO smartphone? Check out cases and tempered glass for POCO phones at Home Screen — you’ll find protection tailored to your model.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

POCO X8 Pro vs POCO X8 Pro Max — what are the differences?

The main differences are the processor (Dimensity 8500-Ultra vs flagship Dimensity 9500s), battery (6,500 vs 8,500 mAh), camera sensor (Sony IMX882 vs Light Fusion 600 with larger pixels), fingerprint reader (optical vs ultrasonic), and connectivity (Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7, no eSIM vs eSIM).

Is the POCO X8 Pro Max worth the extra 400 PLN?

Yes — for an additional 400 PLN, you get a flagship processor with 35% higher performance, a battery that is 2,000 mAh larger, a better camera for night photos, Wi-Fi 7, and eSIM. It’s one of the better upgrades on the smartphone market.

What is the price of the POCO X8 Pro in Poland?

The POCO X8 Pro costs from 1,399 PLN (8/256 GB, promotional price) to 1,899 PLN (12/512 GB, regular price). There is also a limited Iron Man edition available for 1,749–1,999 PLN.

Are the POCO X8 Pro and X8 Pro Max waterproof?

Yes — both models have an IP68 and IP69K certification, which means they are resistant to immersion in water (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes) and to a stream of hot water under pressure.

How long does the battery last in the POCO X8 Pro Max?

The 8,500 mAh battery in the POCO X8 Pro Max lasts for 2–3 days of moderate use. The 100 W HyperCharge charging allows you to regain 50% of the energy in about 24 minutes.

Does the POCO X8 Pro have eSIM?

No — eSIM is only available in the POCO X8 Pro Max. The Pro model supports only two physical nano-SIM cards.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are the latest wireless headphones from Samsung with Adaptive ANC 2.0, Bluetooth 6.1, and a weight of 5.1 g. Compared to Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, they offer better noise cancellation, longer battery life in tests, and head gesture support. They cost 1099 PLN compared to about 650-899 PLN for the older model. Which one to choose? Below is a detailed comparison.

Samsung presented the Samsung Buds 4 Pro on February 25, 2026, and sales in Poland started on March 11. This is the direct successor to the Samsung Buds 3 Pro from July 2024. Both Samsung headphone models have a dual-driver system (dynamic + planar), ANC, and IP57 water resistance, but differ in several significant aspects.

Looking for a case or accessories for your headphones? Check out accessories for Galaxy Buds 4 and 4 Pro and accessories for Galaxy Buds 3 and 3 Pro.

📊 Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro Specification

Parameter	Galaxy Buds 4 Pro	Galaxy Buds 3 Pro
Release	March 2026	July 2024
Low-frequency driver	11 mm dynamic	10.5 mm dynamic
High-frequency driver	5.4 mm planar	6.1 mm planar
ANC	Adaptive ANC 2.0	Adaptive ANC
Bluetooth	6.1	5.4
Codecs	SBC, AAC, LC3, SSC, SSC UHQ	SBC, AAC, LC3, SSC, SSC UHQ
Battery (earbud)	61 mAh	53 mAh
Battery (case)	530 mAh	515 mAh
Playback time (ANC on)	up to 6 h (tested: 6 h 1 min)	up to 6 h (tested: 4 h 31 min)
Playback time with case (ANC on)	up to 26 h	up to 26 h
Playback time (ANC off)	up to 7 h	up to 7 h
Playback time with case (ANC off)	up to 30 h	up to 30 h
Weight (earbud)	5.1 g	5.4 g
Weight (case)	approx. 44.3 g	46.5 g
Water resistance	IP57	IP57
Head gestures	yes (answer/reject calls)	no
Voice assistant	Gemini + Bixby simultaneously	Bixby or Google Assistant
Super Clear Call (SWB)	yes (with Galaxy S26)	no
Microphones	6 (including VPU)	6
Charging	USB-C + Qi wireless	USB-C + Qi wireless
Colors	Black, White, Pink Gold	Silver, White
Price in Poland	1099 PLN	1029 PLN (launch) / from approx. 650 PLN (current)

🔊 Sound quality of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro

Both models of Samsung in-ear headphones have a dual-driver system, but in the Buds 4 Pro, Samsung replaced both.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a larger 11 mm woofer (vs 10.5 mm). In practice, this provides about 20% more diaphragm area, resulting in deeper, more controlled bass. Reviewers from SoundGuys and What Hi-Fi describe the sound as energetic yet precise, with better instrument separation.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, on the other hand, have a larger 6.1 mm planar tweeter (vs 5.4 mm in Buds 4 Pro). Theoretically, this should provide an advantage in high frequencies, but tests show that the Buds 3 Pro tended to have overly strong bass that “bled” into the mids.

Audio codecs

Both models support the same codecs: SBC, AAC, LC3, and Samsung Seamless Codec (SSC UHQ) with a resolution of up to 24 bit/96 kHz. Neither supports LDAC or aptX. SSC UHQ requires a Samsung Galaxy S23 or newer smartphone with One UI 6.1.1+.

This means that you will only get the full sound quality with a Samsung smartphone. With an iPhone or phones from other brands, these Samsung wireless headphones are limited to AAC, which is a noticeable loss of quality compared to SSC UHQ.

Tuning and sound character

The Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a slightly darker tuning with less emphasis on the high frequencies. The bass is deep but does not dominate the rest of the range. The mid frequencies (vocals, acoustic instruments) sound cleaner than in the predecessor.

The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have a brighter tuning with more detail in the high frequencies. The soundstage is slightly wider, but the bass can be too expansive, which in some genres (e.g., EDM, hip-hop) leads to “muddiness” in the low frequencies.

The Buds 4 Pro win in sound quality. Better controlled bass, cleaner mid frequencies, and generally a more balanced presentation. The difference is not revolutionary, but it is noticeable.

🔇 ANC: Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro

This is one of the biggest leaps between generations of these Samsung headphones.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro feature Adaptive ANC 2.0, which monitors the environment in real-time and adjusts the noise cancellation to specific frequencies. In SoundGuys tests, these Samsung wireless earbuds reduced around 84% of ambient noise, placing them on par with AirPods Pro 3.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have first-generation Adaptive ANC, which operates based on programmed algorithms. It still provides effective noise reduction, but does not respond as dynamically to changing conditions.

The biggest improvement is seen in the range below 1 kHz, where the noise from air conditioning, fans, and street traffic resides. Both models struggle with sudden loud sounds.

Ambient Mode and Voice Detection

Both Samsung earbuds have:
– Voice Detection: automatic switching to ambient mode when you start speaking
– Ambient Mode: allowing sounds from the environment
– Adaptive EQ: adjustment to the shape of the ear

In ambient mode, Buds 4 Pro sound a bit more natural. The sounds from the environment do not have the “metallic” aftertaste that sometimes appeared in Buds 3 Pro. This is important if you use ambient mode on a daily basis (e.g., in the office).

Buds 4 Pro win this category. Adaptive ANC 2.0 is a real improvement, not a marketing slogan.

🎙️ Call Quality

Here the difference is most apparent and concerns both sides of the connection.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have 6 microphones with a VPU (Voice Pickup Unit) sensor, meaning bone conduction. Additionally, they feature Super Clear Call technology with a bandwidth of 16 kHz (Super Wideband), but only when paired with the Galaxy S26.

In a quiet environment, the voice sounds clear and natural. In noise, the microphone performs well, although there is a slight “digitalization” of the voice. The VPU captures vibrations from the jawbone, which helps isolate the voice from background noise.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro also have 6 microphones, but without the VPU sensor. They support AI noise cancellation, but reviewers rated the call quality as “below average,” especially in loud environments.

Super Clear Call is an exclusive feature of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro that doubles the voice bandwidth (from 8 kHz to 16 kHz). In practice, the caller hears you more clearly, and your voice sounds more natural. However, this requires the Galaxy S26, S26+, or S26 Ultra.

Winner: Buds 4 Pro. VPU and Super Clear Call are noticeable improvements, especially for those who make a lot of phone calls.

🔋 Samsung Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro Battery

On paper, both models look identical: 6 hours with ANC, 7 hours without ANC, 26/30 hours with the case. But tests from independent publications paint a different picture.

Parameter	Buds 4 Pro (test)	Buds 3 Pro (test)
ANC on (SoundGuys)	6 h 1 min	4 h 31 min
Headphone capacity	61 mAh	53 mAh
Case capacity	530 mAh	515 mAh

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro with a 61 mAh battery (15% more than Buds 3 Pro) achieved exactly 6 hours and 1 minute in SoundGuys tests with ANC on. This result is close to the manufacturer’s claims.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro with a 53 mAh battery lasted only 4 hours and 31 minutes in the same tests, which is 25% less than the claimed 6 hours.

Both models charge via USB-C and wirelessly (Qi). Samsung does not provide exact charging times, but in practice, fully charging the case with a cable takes about 1.5 hours. The earbuds themselves charge to full in about 50-60 minutes while in the case.

Battery: Advantage Buds 4 Pro. An hour and a half longer battery life in real conditions is a significant difference, especially during travel or long workouts.

🎨 Design and Comfort

Samsung has changed its approach to design in the Buds 4 Pro, focusing on premium materials.

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have metal (aluminum) stems with a matte finish and delicate touch grooves. The case is flat, horizontal, with a transparent cover through which the earbuds are visible. Weighing 5.1 g per earbud makes them one of the lighter in this class.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have plastic stems with a backlit LED strip that lights up during pairing and notifications. The case is vertical, traditional, without a transparent cover. Weighing 5.4 g per earbud.

Fit and Ear Tips

The difference of 0.3 g per earbud sounds like nothing, but it matters during hours of wear. Both models come with 4 sizes of silicone ear tips (XS, S, M, L). Samsung claims that the Buds 4 Pro were designed based on the analysis of 100 million ear scans and 10,000 virtual simulations.

In practice, both models sit securely in the ear and are suitable for running and exercising. The IP57 certification means protection against dust and immersion in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes, which is sufficient for sweating during workouts.

Available colors:
– Buds 4 Pro: Black, White, Pink Gold
– Buds 3 Pro: Silver, White

A tie with a slight advantage for Buds 4 Pro. The aluminum stems look premium, and the lighter weight improves comfort. But if you like the LED on the stems of Buds 3 Pro, it’s a matter of taste.

📱 Smart features and Samsung ecosystem

Head gestures (only Buds 4 Pro)

A new feature exclusive to Samsung Buds 4 Pro: nodding your head answers a call, shaking your head rejects it. Works only with Samsung phones. A small but useful novelty when your hands are busy while cooking, training, or cycling.

Voice assistant

Buds 4 Pro support both Gemini and Bixby simultaneously: you say “Hey Google” or “Hey Bixby” without needing to select in settings. Buds 3 Pro require choosing one assistant (Bixby, Google Assistant, or Siri).

Having a dual assistant means you can use Gemini for questions and searches, and Bixby for controlling your Samsung phone settings. It’s a convenient solution for Galaxy ecosystem users.

Spatial Audio and 360 Audio

Both Samsung headphone models support spatial audio with head tracking. The effect is most noticeable when watching movies on the Samsung Galaxy Tab. In music, Spatial Audio can be controversial as it widens the soundstage at the expense of precision.

Other Common Features

Both models have:
– Real-Time Interpreter: real-time conversation translation (requires Galaxy AI)
– Auracast: audio sharing via Bluetooth LE Audio (e.g., sharing music with a friend)
– SmartThings Find: locating lost earbuds
– Adapt Sound: sound personalization based on hearing tests
– Dialogue Boost: enhancing dialogues in movies and podcasts
– Fall Detection: automatic notification to emergency contacts

Compatibility with Phones

These Samsung earbuds work with both Android and iOS. However, you will only fully utilize their capabilities (SSC UHQ, head gestures, Super Clear Call, Galaxy AI) with a Samsung smartphone.

With an iPhone, you lose: head gestures, Super Clear Call, SSC UHQ codec, SmartThings Find, and automatic pairing. You are left with AAC, basic ANC, and touch controls. If you have an iPhone, consider AirPods Pro 3 as an alternative.

💰 Price of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs Buds 3 Pro in Poland

Model	Launch Price	Current Price (March 2026)
Galaxy Buds 4 Pro	1099 PLN	1099 PLN
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro	1029 PLN	from approx. 650 PLN

This is the most important difference in this comparison. Samsung Buds 3 Pro, which launched at 1029 PLN, can now be purchased for 650-899 PLN (depending on the store and promotions). Galaxy Buds 4 Pro cost 1099 PLN without discounts.

The difference between the launch prices is only 70 PLN. But between the current price of Buds 3 Pro and Buds 4 Pro, it is even 200-450 PLN.

The question then comes down to: is Adaptive ANC 2.0, better battery performance in tests, head gestures, and Bluetooth 6.1 worth the extra 200-450 PLN?

If you are buying Samsung earbuds for several years and care about the best ANC and calls, the answer is yes. If you are looking for good value for money, Buds 3 Pro for 650-700 PLN are still great wireless earbuds from Samsung.

In Europe, the price of Galaxy Buds 4 Pro is 249 euros, which is identical to the launch price of Buds 3 Pro. In the USA, both models were priced at 249.99 USD, but Buds 3 Pro can now be purchased for about 170-190 USD.

🆚 Who should choose which Samsung earbuds?

Choose Galaxy Buds 4 Pro if:

• You care about the best ANC in the Samsung ecosystem
• You make a lot of phone calls
• You have a Galaxy S26 (Super Clear Call)
• You want head gestures and dual assistant (Gemini + Bixby)
• You bought a Samsung phone in 2026 and want a complete set

Choose Galaxy Buds 3 Pro if:

• You want to save 200-450 PLN
• You don’t need the latest ANC
• Sound is more important than call quality
• You are looking for solid wireless earbuds at a good price
• You have an older Samsung phone (Buds 3 Pro work great anyway)

Do you need a case for your earbuds? Check out accessories for Galaxy Buds 4 and 4 Pro or Galaxy Buds 3 and 3 Pro in our store.

❓ FAQ

Do Galaxy Buds 4 Pro work with iPhone?

Yes. Buds 4 Pro connect to iOS via Bluetooth, but you lose features exclusive to Samsung: head gestures, Super Clear Call, Gemini/Bixby, SmartThings Find, and automatic pairing.

Do Galaxy Buds 3 Pro support LDAC?

No. Neither the Buds 3 Pro nor the Buds 4 Pro support the LDAC codec. Both models use Samsung Seamless Codec (SSC UHQ) offering quality up to 24 bit/96 kHz, but only with Samsung smartphones.

Do Buds 4 Pro have better sound than Buds 3 Pro?

Yes, but the difference is not drastic. The Buds 4 Pro have better-controlled bass and clearer mid-tones thanks to a larger 11 mm driver. In blind tests, audiophiles will mainly notice the difference.

Is it worth buying Buds 3 Pro in 2026?

Yes. For 650-700 PLN, they are one of the best wireless headphones from Samsung with ANC, planar sound, and IP57. The price drop after the release of Buds 4 Pro makes them a great deal.

How much do Galaxy Buds 4 Pro cost in Poland?

The launch price of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro in Poland is 1099 PLN. They are available in three colors: Black, White, and Pink Gold.

Do Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have noise cancellation?

Yes. The Buds 4 Pro feature Adaptive ANC 2.0, which is next-generation active noise cancellation that monitors the environment in real-time and adjusts the attenuation to specific frequencies.

What is the difference between Galaxy Buds 4 Pro and regular Galaxy Buds 4?

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have a dual-driver system (dynamic + planar), Adaptive ANC 2.0, Bluetooth 6.1, and VPU. Regular Galaxy Buds 4 have a single driver, basic ANC, and Bluetooth 5.4. The price difference is about 400 PLN.

Summary

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are an evolution, not a revolution, compared to Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. The most important upgrades are Adaptive ANC 2.0 (realistically better noise cancellation), Bluetooth 6.1, head gestures, dual AI assistant, and better battery in tests (6 h vs 4.5 h with ANC).

Is it worth the extra cost? At the full launch price (1099 vs 1029 PLN), the answer is: yes. At the current price of Buds 3 Pro (about 650-700 PLN), the decision is more difficult, because for almost half the price you get 80-90% of the experience.

Our verdict: Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are the best earbuds Samsung has ever made. But if your budget is limited, Galaxy Buds 3 Pro for 650-700 PLN is one of the best deals on the wireless earbuds market in 2026.

Check out Samsung headphone accessories in our store. And if you’re also planning a new phone, make sure to take care of its proper protection – check outcases for Galaxy S26 Ultra and glass for Galaxy S26 Ultra, which will protect the body and screen from damage.

If you care about the Apple ecosystem, stability, and great video — the better choice will be the iPhone 17 Pro Max.

On the other hand, if you prioritize maximum specifications, a 200 MP camera, S Pen, and greater control over the system — the Galaxy S26 Ultra offers more technology.

6,299 PLN for the iPhone 17 Pro Max. 6,499 PLN for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. The difference? 200 PLN and two completely different ecosystems. On paper, both phones have 6.9-inch screens, flagship processors, and cameras that make DSLRs from a few years ago look pale in comparison. But the devil is in the details.

If you’re wondering which one will be your companion for the next 3-4 years, this article will help you make an informed decision.

📊 Specifications – iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Before we get into the details, here’s a comparison of the key parameters side by side:

Parameter	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Display	6.9″ OLED, 2868×1320, 460 ppi	6.9″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 498 ppi
Brightness	1000/1600/3000 nits	~1750/2600 nits
Processor	Apple A19 Pro	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
RAM	12 GB (unofficially)	12/16 GB
Storage	256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB / 2 TB	256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB
Main Camera	48 MP f/1.78	200 MP f/1.4
Ultrawide	48 MP f/2.2 (120°)	50 MP f/1.9
Telephoto	48 MP 4x f/2.8 (8x optical)	50 MP 5x + 10 MP 3x
Selfie	18 MP f/1.9	12 MP f/2.2
Video	4K Dolby Vision 120fps, ProRes	8K 30fps, 4K 120fps
Battery	4,823 mAh	5,000 mAh
Charging	40 W wired, 25 W MagSafe	60 W wired, 25 W Qi2.2
Dimensions	163.4 x 78.0 x 8.75 mm	163.6 x 78.1 x 7.90 mm
Weight	233 g	214 g
Protection	Ceramic Shield 2, IP68 (6 m)	Gorilla Armor, IP68
Material	Aluminum, Ceramic Shield	Titanium
System	iOS 26	Android 16 + One UI
S Pen / stylus	❌	✅
Price (256 GB)	6,299 zł	6,499 zł

At first glance, it’s clear: these are two different approaches to a flagship. Samsung focuses on camera resolution and faster charging, while Apple emphasizes the video ecosystem and memory capacity. Let’s get into the details.

⚡ Performance and Processor

A19 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

The iPhone 17 Pro Max is powered by Apple A19 Pro — a chip manufactured using a 2 nm process with a 6-core CPU and a 6-core GPU featuring hardware ray tracing. Samsung counters with the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 from Qualcomm, which Samsung uses in all regions (no more Exynos in Europe).

Benchmarks vs Reality

In Geekbench 6 tests, Samsung surprised: the Galaxy S26 Ultra scored 11,738 points in multi-core — about 20% more than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (~9,700 pts). Single-core? Samsung also leads with a score of 3,852 points.

Does this mean that Samsung is faster in everyday use? Not necessarily. iOS traditionally optimizes resources better, so an iPhone with less RAM (12 GB vs 16 GB in the top version of Samsung) can perform just as smoothly. The differences in benchmarks mainly translate to:

• Video and 3D graphics rendering — here Samsung has a measurable advantage
• Multitasking with multiple heavy applications — 16 GB of RAM gives Samsung a buffer
• Everyday applications (social media, browser, maps) — both phones operate at the same speed

💡 Tip: If you are not rendering video on your phone and not playing the latest 3D games, you simply won’t notice any performance differences between these two flagships.

---

Display – iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Resolution, brightness, and screen features

The iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra offer large, 6.9-inch OLED displays with a refresh rate of 120 Hz. However, this is where the similarities between the screens of both flagships essentially end.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a higher screen resolution — 3120 × 1440 px (498 ppi), while iPhone 17 Pro Max offers 2868 × 1320 px (460 ppi). In practice, you will notice the difference in sharpness mainly when viewing text or images very closely. In everyday use, both displays are simply phenomenally sharp.

Where does the iPhone 17 Pro Max catch up? Screen brightness. Apple claims even up to 3000 nits at peak (e.g., in full sunlight) — this is one of the highest values on the smartphone market. Galaxy S26 Ultra reaches about 2600 nits, so in very bright conditions, the iPhone may be slightly more readable.

However, Samsung has something that we won’t find in the iPhone — the Privacy Display feature. This technology limits the screen viewing angle, so people sitting next to you on the bus or train won’t see your messages or banking app. In terms of privacy, this is a very practical solution.

Feature	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Resolution	2868×1320 (460 ppi)	3120×1440 (498 ppi)
Peak Brightness	3,000 nits	~2,600 nits
Privacy Display	❌	✅
Glass	Ceramic Shield 2	Gorilla Armor
Always-On Display	✅	✅

💡With such large and bright screens, it’s worth considering their protection — tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max and tempered glass for Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra can be found at homescreen.pl

---

📸 Camera and Photography

This is where the most interesting part of the comparison begins. Both phones have camera systems that compete with compact cameras, but they approach photography from different angles.

Main Camera: 48 MP vs 200 MP

Samsung boasts a 200 MP with an aperture of f/1.4 — the brightest aperture in Galaxy history. It lets in 47% more light than the S25 Ultra (f/1.7). The iPhone responds with a “modest” 48 MP, but with optical sensor-shift stabilization.

Is 200 MP better than 48 MP? By default, both phones take pictures at ~12 MP (through pixel binning). Samsung wins in situations where you want to pull out detail — the full 200 MP provides huge files for cropping. The iPhone focuses on color consistency across all three lenses.

Zoom: periscope system

Zoom	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Ultrawide	48 MP, 0.5x	50 MP, 0.6x
Main	48 MP, 1x-2x	200 MP, 1x
Telephoto #1	—	10 MP, 3x
Telephoto #2	48 MP, 4x (8x optical)	50 MP, 5x
Max digital zoom	40x	100x (Space Zoom AI)

Samsung offers two telephoto lenses (3x and 5x), providing greater flexibility. The iPhone has one 4x telephoto lens, but with the ability to crop to 8x without loss of quality (thanks to the 48 MP sensor). In practice, both systems deliver excellent results up to ~10x zoom. Above that, Samsung leads with its 100x Space Zoom supported by AI.

Selfies and Portrait Mode

The iPhone wins in selfies — 18 MP with autofocus and Center Stage vs 12 MP on Samsung. Center Stage automatically crops the shot, tracking your face during video calls. Samsung has HDR10+ in selfies, but with lower resolution.

🎬 Video and Filming

This is a category where the iPhone traditionally dominates — and the 17 Pro Max maintains this position.

iPhone 17 Pro Max records 4K Dolby Vision up to 120 fps and supports ProRes — a format used in professional post-production. Slow-motion in 4K at 120 fps is a quality that just 3 years ago required a camera costing several thousand zlotys. Additionally, Spatial Video for Apple Vision Pro.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra records 8K at 30 fps — higher resolution on paper, but 30 fps limits smoothness. In 4K, Samsung offers up to 120 fps, which levels the playing field. However, there is no equivalent to ProRes — Samsung’s files are compressed.

Feature	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Max resolution	4K 120 fps (Dolby Vision)	8K 30 fps
ProRes / pro format	✅ ProRes 4K 120 fps	❌
Slow-motion	4K 120fps, 1080p 240fps	4K 120fps, 1080p 240fps
Spatial Video	✅	❌
Stabilization	Sensor-shift OIS	OIS

Verdict: If filming is a priority for you, the iPhone has no competition in the smartphone segment. If you mainly record short clips for social media, both phones perform excellently.

---

🔋 Battery and Charging

Battery capacity and charging speed

Samsung has a larger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,823 mAh), but the iPhone compensates with better energy optimization. Apple claims 39 hours of video playback for the Pro Max — one of the best results on the market.

Where does Samsung clearly win? Wired charging.

Charging	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
Wired	40 W (50% in 20 min)	60 W (75% in 30 min)
Wireless	25 W (MagSafe/Qi2)	25 W (Qi2.2)
Reverse charging	✅ (MagSafe)	✅ (4.5 W)

Samsung charges significantly faster via wired — 60 W vs 40 W. If you forgot to charge your phone overnight, Samsung will get back to 75% in half an hour. The iPhone takes longer, although 50% in 20 minutes is still a decent result.

Wireless charging is a tie — 25 W on both sides. Both support reverse charging (charging headphones or a watch from the phone).

---

🤖 AI and Software

This is a category that in 2026 becomes one of the most important differentiators. Both phones offer advanced AI features, but in different styles.

Apple Intelligence

Apple Intelligence operates deeply within iOS 26. Key features:

• Siri with context — understands what is on the screen, continues the conversation, executes complex commands
• Writing tools — summarization, tone correction, rewriting text in any application
• Genmoji — generating personalized emojis from a description
• Image Playground — creating AI images in illustration style
• Notification prioritization — AI sorts notifications by importance

Galaxy AI

Samsung Galaxy AI in S26 Ultra offers:

• Real-time conversation translation — during phone calls, without internet
• Circle to Search — circle anything on the screen to search for it
• Generative Edit — filling in photo fragments with AI-generated content
• Note Assist — note summaries, transcription of recordings
• Privacy Display AI — intelligent dimming of the screen when someone is looking from the side

Updates — how many years of support?

Here is the key difference. Apple traditionally supports iPhones for 6-7 years of iOS updates. Samsung promises 7 years of system and security updates starting with the S24 series — matching Apple.

In practice, both phones purchased today will receive updates until 2032-2033. This means that an investment of ~6,300 PLN is spread over at least 7 years of support.

💰 Price and Value for Money

How much does the iPhone 17 Pro Max cost vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

Variant	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Galaxy S26 Ultra
256 GB	6,299 PLN	6,499 PLN
512 GB	7,299 PLN	7,499 PLN
1 TB	8,299 PLN	9,499 PLN
2 TB	10,299 PLN	❌ not available

iPhone 17 Pro Max is about 200 PLN cheaper than the Galaxy S26 Ultra in every memory variant. In practice, this means that regardless of the chosen version — 256 GB, 512 GB, or 1 TB — the Apple smartphone remains slightly more affordable.

Additionally, Apple is the only one offering a variant with as much as 2 TB of memory, which we won’t find in the Galaxy S26 Ultra. This can be especially significant for those recording a lot of high-quality video or photographers working with ProRAW and ProRes files, which can take up a lot of space.

💡 Tip: If 256 GB turns out to be too little, and 1 TB too much, the best compromise for most users will be the 512 GB variant. In both models, it costs around 7,300–7,500 PLN and offers enough space for photos, videos, and applications for several years of use.

---

iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra – summary

Which flagship will be the better choice?

After analyzing 8 categories, there is no clear winner. Both phones are phenomenal, but they target different users.

If you plan to purchase one of these flagships, it’s worth thinking about protection right away — a good case for the iPhone 17 Pro Max or case for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra will help secure the phone from the very first day of use.

iPhone 17 Pro Max — for whom?

• Filmmakers and video creators — ProRes, Dolby Vision 4K 120fps, Spatial Video
• Apple ecosystem users — Mac, iPad, AirPods, Apple Watch, Vision Pro
• People valuing long-term value — iPhones hold their value longer in the secondary market
• Photographers needing large storage — 2 TB option
• People preferring simplicity — iOS is less customizable but more consistent

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — for whom?

• S Pen users — notes, drawing, precise control
• Photographers focusing on zoom — 100x Space Zoom, two telephoto lenses
• People who value fast charging — 60 W wired
• Multitaskers — DeX, split windows, 16 GB RAM
• People who value screen privacy — Privacy Display is a unique feature

If you already have an iPhone or Samsung…

Changing ecosystems is not just about getting a new phone — it’s about changing your watch, headphones, subscriptions, and habits. If you’ve been in the Apple or Samsung ecosystem for years, switching to the other side is rarely worthwhile. Choose a newer model within your ecosystem.

Are you buying your first flagship? Check out both in the store. Hold them in your hand. See which interface feels more intuitive to you. For around 6,300-6,500 PLN, you can’t go wrong with either of them.

Regardless of whether you choose an iPhone or Samsung, it’s worth taking care of the right accessories right away — especially screen protection, a case, and a good charger. If you’re looking for proven models, check out our rankings and guides:

– Best tempered glass for iPhone 17 Pro Max →
– Top 10 cases for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra →
– What charger for iPhone 17? →
– Best charger for Samsung Galaxy S25 →

FAQ – frequently asked questions

How much does the iPhone 17 Pro Max cost in Poland?
The iPhone 17 Pro Max starts at 6,299 PLN for the 256 GB version. The 512 GB variant costs 7,299 PLN, 1 TB — 8,299 PLN, and 2 TB — 10,299 PLN.

When is the release of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was released in the first quarter of 2026. The phone has been available in Polish stores since February 2026.

Which has a better camera — iPhone 17 Pro Max or Galaxy S26 Ultra?
It depends on the use case. Samsung excels in photography with high zoom (100x Space Zoom) and has a brighter main lens (f/1.4). The iPhone has better color consistency between lenses and dominates in video recording (ProRes, Dolby Vision 4K 120fps).

Which has longer update support?
Both offer 7 years of system and security updates. The iPhone 17 Pro Max will be supported until ~2032, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra — until ~2033.

Is it worth waiting for the S26 Ultra, or should I buy the S25 Ultra cheaper?
The S26 Ultra offers several significant upgrades: a brighter f/1.4 lens (vs f/1.7), Privacy Display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and next-generation Galaxy AI. If you find the S25 Ultra at a good price (below 5,000 PLN), it is still an excellent phone. But if you are buying for the next 3-4 years — the S26 Ultra is a better investment.

iPhone 17 Pro Max or Galaxy S26 Ultra — which is lighter?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra weighs 214 g — 19 g less than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 g). Samsung is also slimmer: 7.9 mm vs 8.75 mm.