Tag: Samsung

  • iPhone Duo or Galaxy Z Fold 8? A Comparison of Foldables

    iPhone Duo or Galaxy Z Fold 8? A Comparison of Foldables

    iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a choice between two foldable phones in a passport format, with an internal screen of the same diagonal of 7.6 inches. The iPhone wins with its IP68 dust and water resistance and the Apple ecosystem. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 is 53 g lighter, thinner, cheaper by 1,250 PLN, and has Galaxy AI in Polish.

    The choice will mainly depend on the system you are already using. We compared both phones parameter by parameter based on the official specifications from Apple and Samsung, and at the end of each section, we provide a brief verdict.

    One caveat: the iPhone Duo will be available for sale only on October 23, so this is a comparison of manufacturer data, not a test.

    iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8: key differences in the table

    ParameteriPhone DuoGalaxy Z Fold 8
    Internal display7.6″, 1878 × 2670 px, 430 ppi, matte finish7.6″ (4:3), 2448 × 1848 px, 403 ppi
    External display5.4″, 1398 × 2034 px, 460 ppi5.5″ (16:10), 1972 × 1248 px, 428 ppi
    Peak brightness3000 nits3000 nits
    Dimensions when folded117.8 × 84.1 × 11.3 mm123.9 × 81.9 × 9.7 mm
    Thickness when unfolded5.2 mm4.5 mm
    Weight254 g201 g
    ProcessorApple A20 ProSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy
    Memory256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB
    Rear cameras48 MP + 48 MP ultra-wide50 MP + 50 MP ultra-wide
    Telephoto
    Front cameras12 MP (external) + FaceTime under the display10 MP (external) + 10 MP (internal)
    Batterytwo cells, Apple does not provide mAh4,800 mAh, two cells
    Wired charging50% in about 20 min (60 W charger)63% in about 30 min (45 W charger)
    Wireless chargingMagSafe and Qi2 up to 25 WQi up to 20 W, reverse charging
    BiometricsTouch ID in the side buttonreader in the side button
    SIM cardonly eSIM (two numbers)nano-SIM + eSIM (two lines at once)
    ResistanceIP68IP48
    Stylus✅ Apple Pencil (USB-C), support later in 2026❌ no S Pen support
    SystemiOS 27Android 17, One UI 9
    Updatesmin. 5 years of security patches7 generations of Android, 7 years of patches
    AI in Polish
    Price in Poland (from)9,999 PLN8,749 PLN

    Data: iPhone Duo specifications, comparison of Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Fold 8 Ultra and Samsung press release

    Appearance and format: two passports, different proportions

    Both phones when folded resemble a passport, rather than a narrow bar like the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. However, the differences are noticeable in hand. The iPhone Duo is 6 mm shorter and 2 mm wider, but is 11.3 mm thick, while the Fold 8 is only 9.7 mm.

    An even greater difference concerns weight. The Fold 8 weighs 201 g and according to Samsung is the lightest Fold in history. The iPhone Duo weighs 254 g, over a quarter more. When unfolded, the thickness difference decreases, but the Fold 8 is still thinner: 4.5 mm compared to 5.2 mm.

    On the left, the unfolded iPhone Duo, on the right, the Galaxy Z Fold 8. Sources: Apple Newsroom, Samsung Newsroom

    Apple has made the casing from Grade 5 titanium with a mirror polish. Samsung opted for Flex Titanium technology, which is a titanium layer under the screen that is meant to strengthen the panel and over time reduce the visibility of the crease.

    Verdict: Galaxy Z Fold 8. It is lighter by 53 g and thinner when folded by 1.6 mm.

    Screens and the crease

    On paper, it’s a draw. Both internal screens have 7.6 inches, a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, and brightness of up to 3000 nits. The iPhone has slightly denser pixels (430 vs. 403 ppi), but you won’t see this difference from a normal distance.

    What matters is the finish. The iPhone Duo has a matte nanostructural coating that suppresses reflections and, according to Apple, reduces the visibility of the crease line. Samsung uses a low-reflectance finish and a Vision Booster feature, but does not describe the screen as matte.

    The second difference is the aspect ratio. In the Fold 8, the internal screen has a 4:3 format, close to square, which is comfortable for reading and working on documents. According to Apple, both Duo screens have the same aspect ratio, so when unfolded, the content scales proportionally, and the transition from the small screen to the large one is smooth.

    Note: some Fold 8 owners have noticed that the corners of the inner screen slightly bend under pressure. In response to users in South Korea, Samsung explained that this is a deliberate cushioning zone that protects the display, not a defect. This also applies to the Fold 8 Ultra. Reports SamMobile.

    Verdict: a tie with a slight edge for the iPhone Duo due to its matte finish.

    Performance and system: A20 Pro vs Snapdragon

    The iPhone Duo received the A20 Pro, the same chip as the iPhone 18 Pro, with a vapor chamber directly connected to the processor. Samsung uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy with 12 or 16 GB of RAM. These are flagship chips of this generation, so neither phone will lack power in everyday use. Which one is faster in games will be shown in tests.

    The bigger difference is in the software. iOS 27 on the iPhone Duo introduces Split View for the first time, allowing two apps side by side. Samsung has been developing multitasking for seven generations of Folds: One UI divides the screen into three apps and adds floating windows.

    Galaxy AI in Polish, Apple Intelligence without Polish

    For Polish users, this is one of the most important differences in this comparison. Galaxy AI supports the Polish language: it includes features such as live conversation translation and Writing Assistant.

    Apple Intelligence operates in 16 languages, among which Polish is not included. If AI features are important to you, the Fold 8 clearly offers more today.

    iOS 27 Features That Won’t Be Available in Poland

    iOS 27 launches in the European Union with limitations. Apple announced in June that due to the requirements of the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA), the new Siri AI is being delayed in the EU. Along with it, you won’t receive the new Siri app, enhanced Visual Intelligence, integrated writing tools, or Siri mode in the camera.

    This is important because these features were showcased by Apple as the biggest advantage of the large Duo screen. On the Polish iPhone Duo, you are left with just the foldable screen and Split View.

    Updates: 7 Generations at Samsung, Minimum 5 Years at Apple

    Samsung promises for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series seven generations of Android updates and seven years of security patches, which starting with Android 17 provides support until Android 24. Apple does not specify how many versions of iOS the iPhone Duo will receive. In documents for the British regulator, it declares a minimum of five years of security patches from the launch for iPhones.

    In practice, iPhones usually receive updates longer than this minimum, but on paper, Samsung’s guarantee is stronger.

    Verdict: performance is a draw until tests, and the software in Poland favors the Fold 8: Galaxy AI in Polish and longer declared support.

    Cameras: 48 MP vs 50 MP, both without telephoto lens

    The sets are almost identical. The iPhone Duo has two 48 MP cameras (main and ultra-wide), while the Fold 8 has two 50 MP cameras. Neither has a telephoto lens, but both offer 2x optical quality zoom, which is a crop from the center of the main sensor.

    On the left, iPhone Duo in starlight white and midnight sky colors, on the right, cameras of Galaxy Z Fold 8. Sources: Apple Newsroom, Samsung Newsroom

    Both manufacturers similarly utilize the second screen. On the iPhone Duo, the Duo Preview feature shows a preview of the shot to the person being photographed. Samsung allows simultaneous recording with the front and rear cameras, with a preview on the external screen.

    With the main camera of the Duo, you can record 4K Dolby Vision video at 120 fps, while the Fold 8 has the My FanCam feature, which automatically tracks a selected person and crops the recording to social media format.

    Who takes better photos will only be revealed by tests. The 10 MP telephoto lens with 3x zoom and the 200 MP camera have been reserved by Samsung for the Fold 8 Ultra, which we show in the comparison of Ultra with Galaxy Z Fold 8.

    Verdict: a tie until tests. The camera setups are almost identical.

    Battery and Charging

    Samsung provides specifics: 4,800 mAh in two cells. Apple does not disclose capacity. It is only known that the Duo also has two cells, one in each half, and according to the manufacturer, it lasts up to 24 hours of typical usage.

    Fast charging according to the manufacturers looks like this:

    • iPhone Duo: 50% in about 20 minutes with a 60 W USB PD charger, 50% in about 30 minutes with MagSafe and a 35 W charger, wirelessly on MagSafe and Qi2 chargers up to 25 W.
    • Galaxy Z Fold 8: 63% in about 30 minutes with a 45 W charger and a 3A cable, wirelessly up to 20 W (Qi), and it also supports reverse charging for other devices.

    Neither of them comes with a charger in the box. For the Duo, choose a USB PD wall charger with a power of at least 60 W, and for the Fold 8, a 45 W charger compatible with Samsung’s fast charging (USB PD with PPS). We described specific models in the guide about chargers for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, as both Folds charge at the same power.

    Verdict: undecidable, as Apple does not provide capacity. The Duo charges faster wirelessly (25 W versus 20 W), while the Fold 8 can charge other devices.

    Durability: IP68 vs IP48

    Here the iPhone has a clear advantage. IP68 rating means complete dust resistance, and Apple claims that the Duo is resistant to immersion up to 6 m for 30 minutes.

    The Galaxy Z Fold 8 has IP48. Samsung claims resistance to immersion up to 1.5 m in fresh water for 30 minutes, but it only partially protects against dust, as the standard covers particles larger than 1 mm. The manufacturer itself advises against using it on the beach and by the pool.

    On the front, the iPhone features a Ceramic Shield 2 layer, which according to Apple is 3x more scratch-resistant than the previous generation. By 2026, the Duo will also receive support for Apple Pencil, while Samsung has already abandoned the S Pen stylus with the Galaxy Z Fold 7.

    Verdict: iPhone Duo. IP68 is a real advantage in a phone with a movable hinge.

    Price and availability in Poland

    MemoryiPhone DuoGalaxy Z Fold 8
    256 GB9,999 PLN8,749 PLN
    512 GB10,999 PLN9,599 PLN
    1 TB12,999 PLN11,299 PLN
    2 TB15,999 PLNnot available

    Manufacturer’s list prices as of September 10, 2026. Samsung’s store has ongoing promotions, so the Fold 8 can be cheaper.

    The difference in the base version is 1,250 PLN in favor of Samsung. For the price of the basic Duo, you can buy the Fold 8 with 512 GB and have 400 PLN left. The Fold 8 is already on sale, while the iPhone Duo goes on pre-sale on October 16 at 2:00 PM and hits stores on October 23. Only Apple offers a version with 2 TB.

    Before purchasing, check your SIM card. The iPhone Duo does not have a tray and only supports eSIM. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 has a nano-SIM slot and supports eSIM, with a maximum of two active lines at the same time according to SamMobile. If you are using a physical card, ask your operator for an eSIM before switching to the Duo.

    Verdict: Galaxy Z Fold 8. It is cheaper in every capacity and available immediately.

    Which foldable phone to choose: iPhone Duo or Galaxy Z Fold 8?

    The choice is simpler than the length of the table suggests:

    • Choose the iPhone Duo if you have an iPhone, Mac, or Apple Watch, you care about dust resistance, and you plan to write with a stylus. However, be prepared for a higher price, greater weight, and lack of AI in Polish.
    • Choose the Galaxy Z Fold 8 if you use Android, want a lighter phone, AI in Polish, and richer multitasking. You save 1,250 PLN and can buy it right away, but you have to reckon with weaker dust protection (IP48) and lack of a stylus.
    • Consider another model if you care about zooming from a distance. None of these foldables have a telephoto lens; for example, the iPhone 18 Pro has one (4x) or the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra (3x).

    Switching from iOS to Android (or vice versa) just for a foldable phone is rarely worth it. Apple Watch works exclusively with iPhone, iMessage and FaceTime won’t transfer to Android, and Galaxy Watch doesn’t work with iPhone. You can transfer data using the Move to iOS app or Samsung Smart Switch, but you won’t be able to transfer the accessory ecosystem and subscriptions.

    In the showdown between iPhone Duo and Galaxy Z Fold 8, there is no single winner. The key takeaways:

    1. The screen is a tie. Both have 7.6 inches, and the Duo stands out with its matte finish.
    2. Fold 8 is lighter and thinner. 201 g and 9.7 mm compared to 254 g and 11.3 mm.
    3. Duo is more water-resistant and will get a stylus. IP68 vs IP48, and support for Apple Pencil will arrive in 2026.
    4. Fold 8 has AI in Polish and longer support. Apple Intelligence does not support Polish, and Siri AI does not work in the EU at launch.
    5. Fold 8 is cheaper by 1,250 PLN and available immediately along with a full range of accessories.

    Everything about the iPhone Duo itself, including the full specifications and Polish pricing, can be found in our article about the foldable iPhone Duo.

    Accessories for Galaxy Z Fold 8 and iPhone Duo: what you can buy today

    This is a practical difference that is easy to forget. There are already dozens of products available for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 in our offer: cases, glass, films, and camera covers. The category of iPhone Duo accessories is waiting for the first models that manufacturers will prepare after the official dimensions are published.

    Spigen Airskin Aramid MagSafe

    Spigen Airskin Aramid MagSafe is a thin case made of aramid fiber with a magnetic ring. The Fold 8 does not have built-in magnets, so only with such a case can you attach it to MagSafe chargers and mounts, while the phone retains its greatest advantage, which is its low weight.

    Supcase UB Grip Mag MagSafe

    Supcase UB Grip Mag MagSafe is the choice for those who want stronger protection and a more secure grip. The case will not improve dust resistance, but it will protect the edges and hinge area from drops and scratches.

    Tech-Protect Easy Set Foil & Glass Fit+ 4in1

    Tech-Protect Easy Set Foil & Glass Fit+ 4in1 combines a film for the inner screen with glass for the outer one, which is exactly how a foldable should be protected. We explain why rigid glass is not suitable for the inner screen in our review of glasses for Galaxy Z Fold 8.

    [hs_products ids=”142087,141063,142722″ cols=”3″ title=”Accessories for Galaxy Z Fold 8″]

    FAQ: iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8

    Which is better: iPhone Duo or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8?

    Neither wins in everything, and whether the iPhone or Samsung Galaxy turns out to be better mainly depends on the system you are already using. The iPhone Duo is more waterproof (IP68) and will support Apple Pencil by 2026, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 is lighter by 53 g, cheaper by 1,250 PLN, and has Galaxy AI in Polish.

    How much does Galaxy Z Fold 8 cost, and how much is iPhone Duo?

    The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 costs in Poland from 8,749 PLN, while the iPhone Duo starts at 9,999 PLN, in both cases for the 256 GB version. You can buy the Samsung immediately, while the Duo will hit stores on October 23.

    What does the iPhone Duo have that the Samsung doesn’t?

    Full dust resistance with an IP68 rating, a version with 2 TB of storage, a matte finish on the internal screen, and built-in MagSafe magnets, so it works with magnetic chargers without an additional case. It will also receive support for Apple Pencil by 2026.

    What does the Galaxy Z Fold 8 have that the iPhone Duo doesn’t?

    Galaxy AI in Polish, multitasking with three apps side by side and floating windows, a nano-SIM slot, lower weight (201 g compared to 254 g), and a thinner body. It is also cheaper by 1,250 PLN and already available.

    Does the Galaxy Z Fold 8 support the S Pen?

    No. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Fold 8 Ultra do not support the S Pen. Samsung dropped the stylus starting with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 in 2025.

    Does the iPhone Duo have a SIM card?

    No. The iPhone Duo only supports eSIM, with a maximum of two numbers simultaneously. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 has a nano-SIM slot and supports eSIM, so it will work with a traditional card.

    Does a case for the Samsung Fold 8 fit the iPhone Duo?

    No. The phones have different dimensions and differently arranged cameras, so each requires a dedicated case.

    Sources: iPhone Duo specifications, Apple press release, Apple on the suspension of Siri AI in the EU, comparison of Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Fold 8 Ultra on Samsung’s website, Samsung press release on Galaxy Z Fold 8, SamMobile on the screen corners of Fold 8, SamMobile on SIM cards in the Z8 series

  • iPhone Duo or Galaxy Z Fold 8? A Comparison of Foldables

    iPhone Duo or Galaxy Z Fold 8? A Comparison of Foldables

    iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a choice between two foldable phones in a passport format, with an internal screen of the same diagonal of 7.6 inches. The iPhone wins with its IP68 dust and water resistance and the Apple ecosystem. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 is 53 g lighter, thinner, cheaper by 1,250 PLN, and has Galaxy AI in Polish.

    The choice will mainly depend on the system you are already using. We compared both phones parameter by parameter based on the official specifications from Apple and Samsung, and at the end of each section, we provide a brief verdict.

    One caveat: the iPhone Duo will be available for sale only on October 23, so this is a comparison of manufacturer data, not a test.

    iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8: key differences in the table

    ParameteriPhone DuoGalaxy Z Fold 8
    Internal screen7.6″, 1878 × 2670 px, 430 ppi, matte finish7.6″ (4:3), 2448 × 1848 px, 403 ppi
    External screen5.4″, 1398 × 2034 px, 460 ppi5.5″ (16:10), 1972 × 1248 px, 428 ppi
    Peak brightness3000 nits3000 nits
    Dimensions when folded117.8 × 84.1 × 11.3 mm123.9 × 81.9 × 9.7 mm
    Thickness when unfolded5.2 mm4.5 mm
    Weight254 g201 g
    ProcessorApple A20 ProSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy
    Memory256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB
    Rear cameras48 MP + 48 MP ultra-wide50 MP + 50 MP ultra-wide
    Telephoto
    Front cameras12 MP (external) + FaceTime under the screen10 MP (external) + 10 MP (internal)
    Batterytwo cells, Apple does not specify mAh4,800 mAh, two cells
    Wired charging50% in about 20 min (60 W charger)63% in about 30 min (45 W charger)
    Wireless chargingMagSafe and Qi2 up to 25 WQi up to 20 W, reverse charging
    BiometricsTouch ID in the side buttonreader in the side button
    SIM cardonly eSIM (two numbers)nano-SIM + eSIM (two lines at once)
    ResistanceIP68IP48
    Stylus✅ Apple Pencil (USB-C), support later in 2026❌ no S Pen support
    SystemiOS 27Android 17, One UI 9
    Updatesmin. 5 years of security patches7 generations of Android, 7 years of patches
    AI in Polish
    Price in Poland (from)9,999 PLN8,749 PLN

    Data: iPhone Duo specifications, comparison of Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Fold 8 Ultra and Samsung press release

    Appearance and format: two passports, different proportions

    Both phones when folded resemble a passport, rather than a narrow bar like the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. However, the differences are noticeable in hand. The iPhone Duo is 6 mm shorter and 2 mm wider, but it has a thickness of 11.3 mm, while the Fold 8 is only 9.7 mm.

    An even greater difference concerns weight. The Fold 8 weighs 201 g and according to Samsung is the lightest Fold in history. The iPhone Duo weighs 254 g, over a quarter more. When unfolded, the thickness difference decreases, but the Fold 8 is still thinner: 4.5 mm compared to 5.2 mm.

    On the left, the unfolded iPhone Duo, on the right, the Galaxy Z Fold 8. Sources: Apple Newsroom, Samsung Newsroom

    Apple has crafted the casing from Grade 5 titanium with a mirror polish. Samsung opted for Flex Titanium technology, which includes a titanium layer under the screen designed to strengthen the panel and gradually reduce the visibility of the crease over time.

    Verdict: Galaxy Z Fold 8. It is lighter by 53 g and thinner when folded by 1.6 mm.

    Screens and crease

    On paper, it’s a draw. Both internal screens measure 7.6 inches, with a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz and brightness of up to 3000 nits. The iPhone has slightly denser pixels (430 vs. 403 ppi), but you won’t notice this difference from a normal viewing distance.

    Finish matters. The iPhone Duo features a matte nanostructural coating that reduces glare and, according to Apple, minimizes the visibility of the crease line. Samsung uses a low-reflectance finish and Vision Booster feature, but does not describe the screen as matte.

    The second difference is the aspect ratio. In the Fold 8, the internal screen has a 4:3 format, close to square, which is comfortable for reading and working on documents. According to Apple, both Duo screens have the same aspect ratio, so when unfolded, the content scales proportionally, and transitioning from the small screen to the large one is seamless.

    Note: some Fold 8 owners have noticed that the corners of the inner screen slightly bend under pressure. Samsung explained to users in South Korea that this is a deliberate cushioning zone that protects the display, not a defect. This also applies to the Fold 8 Ultra. Reports SamMobile.

    Verdict: a tie with a slight advantage for the iPhone Duo due to its matte finish.

    Performance and system: A20 Pro vs Snapdragon

    The iPhone Duo features the A20 Pro, the same chip as the iPhone 18 Pro, with a vapor chamber directly connected to the processor. Samsung uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy with 12 or 16 GB of RAM. These are the flagship chips of this generation, so neither phone will lack power in everyday use. Which one is faster in games will be shown in tests.

    The bigger difference is in the software. iOS 27 on the iPhone Duo introduces Split View for the first time, allowing two apps side by side. Samsung has been developing multitasking for seven generations of Fold devices: One UI splits the screen into three apps and adds floating windows.

    Galaxy AI in Polish, Apple Intelligence without Polish

    For Polish users, this is one of the most important differences in this comparison. Galaxy AI supports the Polish language: features include live conversation translation and Writing Assistant.

    Apple Intelligence operates in 16 languages, among which Polish is not included. If AI features are important to you, the Fold 8 clearly offers more today.

    iOS 27 features that will not be available in Poland

    iOS 27 launches in the European Union cut down. Apple announced in June that due to the requirements of the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA), it is withholding the new Siri AI in the EU. Along with it, you won’t get the new Siri app, enhanced Visual Intelligence, integrated writing tools, or Siri mode in the camera.

    This is important because these features were showcased by Apple as the biggest advantage of the large Duo screen. On the Polish iPhone Duo, today you only have the foldable screen and Split View.

    Updates: 7 generations at Samsung, minimum 5 years at Apple

    Samsung promises for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series seven generations of Android updates and seven years of security patches, which starting with Android 17 provides support until Android 24. Apple does not specify how many iOS versions the iPhone Duo will receive. In documents for the British regulator, it declares for iPhones a minimum of five years of security patches from the release.

    In practice, iPhones usually receive updates longer than this minimum, but on paper, Samsung’s guarantee is stronger.

    Verdict: performance is a draw until tests, and the software in Poland favors the Fold 8: Galaxy AI in Polish and longer declared support.

    Cameras: 48 MP vs 50 MP, both without telephoto lens

    The sets are almost identical. The iPhone Duo has two 48 MP cameras (main and ultra-wide), while the Fold 8 has two 50 MP cameras. Neither has a telephoto lens, but both offer 2x optical quality zoom, which is a crop from the center of the main sensor.

    Both manufacturers similarly utilize the second screen. On the iPhone Duo, the Duo Preview feature shows a preview of the frame to the person being photographed. Samsung allows simultaneous recording with the front and rear cameras, with a preview on the external screen.

    With the main camera of the Duo, you can record 4K Dolby Vision video at 120 fps, while the Fold 8 has the My FanCam feature, which automatically tracks a selected person and crops the recording to social media format.

    Who takes better photos will only be shown by tests. The 10 MP telephoto lens with 3x zoom and the 200 MP camera have been reserved by Samsung for the Fold 8 Ultra, which we demonstrate in the comparison of the Ultra with the Galaxy Z Fold 8.

    Battery and Charging

    Samsung provides specifics: 4,800 mAh in two cells. Apple does not disclose capacity. It is known that the Duo also has two cells, one in each half, and according to the manufacturer, it lasts up to 24 hours of typical use.

    Fast charging according to the manufacturers looks like this:

    • iPhone Duo: 50% in about 20 minutes with a 60 W USB PD charger, 50% in about 30 minutes with MagSafe and a 35 W charger, wirelessly on MagSafe and Qi2 chargers up to 25 W.
    • Galaxy Z Fold 8: 63% in about 30 minutes with a 45 W charger and a 3A cable, wirelessly up to 20 W (Qi), and also reverse charging for other devices.

    None of them comes with a charger in the box. For the Duo, choose a USB PD wall charger with a power of at least 60 W, and for the Fold 8, a 45 W charger compatible with Samsung’s fast charging (USB PD with PPS). We described specific models in our guide on chargers for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, as both Fold devices charge at the same power.

    Verdict: inconclusive, as Apple does not provide capacity. The Duo charges faster wirelessly (25 W versus 20 W), while the Fold 8 can charge other devices.

    Durability: IP68 vs IP48

    Here, the iPhone has a clear advantage. IP68 rating means complete dust resistance, and Apple claims the Duo is resistant to immersion up to 6 m for 30 minutes.

    The Galaxy Z Fold 8 has IP48. Samsung claims resistance to immersion up to 1.5 m in fresh water for 30 minutes, but it only partially protects against dust, as the standard covers particles larger than 1 mm. The manufacturer itself advises against using it on the beach and by the pool.

    On the front, the iPhone features a Ceramic Shield 2 layer, which Apple claims is 3x more resistant to scratches than the previous generation. By 2026, the Duo will also support Apple Pencil, while Samsung dropped the S Pen stylus already in the Galaxy Z Fold 7.

    Verdict: iPhone Duo. IP68 is a real advantage in a phone with a movable hinge.

    Price and availability in Poland

    MemoryiPhone DuoGalaxy Z Fold 8
    256 GB9,999 PLN8,749 PLN
    512 GB10,999 PLN9,599 PLN
    1 TB12,999 PLN11,299 PLN
    2 TB15,999 PLNunavailable

    Manufacturer’s list prices as of September 10, 2026. Samsung’s store has promotions, so the Fold 8 can be cheaper.

    The difference in the base version is 1,250 PLN in favor of Samsung. For the price of the basic Duo, you can buy the Fold 8 with 512 GB and have 400 PLN left. The Fold 8 is already on sale, while the iPhone Duo goes on pre-sale on October 16 at 2:00 PM and will be in stores on October 23. Only Apple offers the version with 2 TB.

    Before purchasing, check the SIM card. iPhone Duo does not have a tray and supports only eSIM. Galaxy Z Fold 8 has a nano-SIM slot and supports eSIM, with a maximum of two active lines at the same time, according to SamMobile. If you are using a physical card, ask your operator for an eSIM before switching to Duo.

    Verdict: Galaxy Z Fold 8. It is cheaper in every capacity and available immediately.

    Which foldable phone to choose: iPhone Duo or Galaxy Z Fold 8?

    The choice is simpler than the length of the table suggests:

    • Choose iPhone Duo if you have an iPhone, Mac, or Apple Watch, you care about dust resistance, and you plan to write with a stylus. However, be prepared for a higher price, greater weight, and lack of AI in Polish.
    • Choose Galaxy Z Fold 8 if you use Android, want a lighter phone, AI in Polish, and richer multitasking. You save 1,250 PLN and can buy it immediately, but you have to reckon with weaker dust protection (IP48) and lack of a stylus.
    • Consider another model if you care about close-ups from a distance. Neither of these foldables has a telephoto lens; for example, iPhone 18 Pro (4x) or Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra (3x) has one.

    Switching from iOS to Android (or vice versa) is rarely worth it for a foldable phone. Apple Watch works exclusively with iPhone, iMessage and FaceTime won’t transfer to Android, and Galaxy Watch doesn’t work with iPhone. You can transfer data using the Move to iOS app or Samsung Smart Switch, but the ecosystem of accessories and subscriptions won’t carry over.

    In the duel of iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 there is no single winner. The key takeaways:

    1. The screen is a draw. Both have 7.6 inches, and the Duo stands out with a matte finish.
    2. Fold 8 is lighter and thinner. 201 g and 9.7 mm compared to 254 g and 11.3 mm.
    3. Duo is more waterproof and will get a stylus. IP68 versus IP48, and Apple Pencil support will arrive in 2026.
    4. Fold 8 has AI in Polish and longer support. Apple Intelligence does not support Polish, and Siri AI does not work in the EU at launch.
    5. Fold 8 is cheaper by 1,250 PLN and available immediately along with a full range of accessories.

    All about the iPhone Duo itself, including full specifications and Polish pricing, can be found in our article about the foldable iPhone Duo.

    Accessories for Galaxy Z Fold 8 and iPhone Duo: what you can buy today

    This is a practical difference that is easy to forget. There are already several dozen products available for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 in our offer: cases, glass protectors, films, and camera shields. The category of iPhone Duo accessories is waiting for the first models that manufacturers will prepare after the official dimensions are published.

    Spigen Airskin Aramid MagSafe

    Spigen Airskin Aramid MagSafe is a thin case made of aramid fiber with a magnetic ring. The Fold 8 does not have built-in magnets, so only with such a case can you attach it to MagSafe chargers and mounts, while the phone retains its greatest advantage, which is its low weight.

    Supcase UB Grip Mag MagSafe

    Supcase UB Grip Mag MagSafe is the choice for those who want stronger protection and a more secure grip. The case will not improve dust resistance, but it will protect the edges and hinge area from drops and scratches.

    Tech-Protect Easy Set Foil & Glass Fit+ 4in1

    Tech-Protect Easy Set Foil & Glass Fit+ 4in1 combines a foil for the inner screen with glass for the outer one, which is exactly how a foldable should be protected. Why rigid glass is not suitable for the inner screen is explained in the review of glasses for Galaxy Z Fold 8.

    [hs_products ids=”142087,141063,142722″ cols=”3″ title=”Accessories for Galaxy Z Fold 8″]

    FAQ: iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8

    Which is better: iPhone Duo or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8?

    Neither wins in everything, and whether the iPhone or Samsung Galaxy turns out to be better mainly depends on the system you are already using. The iPhone Duo is more water-resistant (IP68) and will support Apple Pencil as early as 2026, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 is lighter by 53 g, cheaper by 1,250 PLN, and has Galaxy AI in Polish.

    How much does Galaxy Z Fold 8 cost, and how much does iPhone Duo cost?

    The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 costs in Poland from 8,749 PLN, while the iPhone Duo starts at 9,999 PLN, in both cases for the 256 GB version. You can buy the Samsung immediately, while the Duo will hit stores on October 23.

    What does the iPhone Duo have that the Samsung doesn’t?

    Full dust and water resistance in IP68 class, a version with 2 TB of storage, a matte finish on the internal screen, and built-in MagSafe magnets, so it works with magnetic chargers without an additional case. It will also receive support for Apple Pencil by 2026.

    What does the Galaxy Z Fold 8 have that the iPhone Duo doesn’t?

    Galaxy AI in Polish, multitasking with three apps side by side and floating windows, a nano-SIM slot, lower weight (201 g compared to 254 g), and a thinner body. It is also cheaper by 1,250 PLN and already available.

    Does the Galaxy Z Fold 8 support the S Pen?

    No. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Fold 8 Ultra do not support the S Pen. Samsung dropped the stylus starting with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 in 2025.

    Does the iPhone Duo have a SIM card?

    No. The iPhone Duo only supports eSIM, with a maximum of two numbers simultaneously. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 has a nano-SIM slot and supports eSIM, so it will work with a traditional card.

    Does a case for the Samsung Fold 8 fit the iPhone Duo?

    No. The phones have different dimensions and differently arranged cameras, so each requires a dedicated case.

    Sources: iPhone Duo specifications, Apple press release, Apple on the suspension of Siri AI in the EU, comparison of Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Fold 8 Ultra on Samsung’s website, Samsung press release on Galaxy Z Fold 8, SamMobile on Fold 8 screen corners, SamMobile on SIM cards in the Z8 series

  • TOP 10 Best Cases for Samsung Galaxy S26 FE

    TOP 10 Best Cases for Samsung Galaxy S26 FE

    The best case for Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag MagSafe. A slim hybrid of TPU and polycarbonate with a built-in magnetic ring, which the phone itself lacks. The greatest protection is provided by 3mk Fortis MagCase with MIL-STD-810H certification.

    TOP 10 in three points:

    • Best overall: Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag MagSafe, a hybrid with magnets and a slim profile
    • Greatest protection: 3mk Fortis MagCase, MIL-STD-810H and 26 drops from 1.26 m without damage
    • Best transparent: Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe, polycarbonate with a magnetic ring

    Galaxy S26 FE went on sale on September 4, 2026, and looks almost identical to its predecessor. However, when buying a case, two things matter that are not visible from the outside: the phone does not have magnets, and most cases from S25 FE do not fit.

    Galaxy S26 FE does not have magnets. This changes the choice of case

    Samsung Galaxy S26 FE does not have built-in magnets. It will charge on a Qi2 charger at 15 W, but it will not magnetically attract to it by itself. The term “Qi2 Ready” has been adopted for this, although Samsung itself does not use it.

    In practice, this means one thing: magnets must be in the case. Without them, the charger will not center itself, a car mount will not hold the phone, and a magnetic wallet will not stick at all.

    That’s why only cases with a built-in magnetic ring made it to this list. This was a prerequisite, not one of the criteria.

    Look for the suffix “Mag”, “MagCase”, “Magnet”, or “MagSafe” in the name. Simply being “compatible with wireless charging” only means that the case does not block charging, not that it adds magnets. You can find more about the standard itself in our guide to accessories with MagSafe technology.

    Check out Qi2 wireless chargers at homescreen.pl →

    Does the case from Galaxy S25 FE fit S26 FE?

    The rigid case from S25 FE does not fit S26 FE. The flexible one fits only if the manufacturer lists both models in the name. So the answer depends on whether the case is rigid or flexible.

    Rigid case: no. The dimensions differ by 0.3 mm in height and width, but the thickness is identical.

    Galaxy S25 FEGalaxy S26 FE
    Dimensions161.3 × 76.6 × 7.4 mm161.6 × 76.9 × 7.4 mm

    The problem does not lie in those three-tenths of a millimeter, but in the redesigned camera island. The cutouts do not align in the same place, and stretching the rigid case ends with a cracked corner.

    Flexible case: sometimes yes, but only with the manufacturer’s declaration. Bizon describes five of its cases directly as “for Samsung Galaxy S26 FE / S25 FE,” so the compatibility with both models is declared by the manufacturer itself. Two of them are in this ranking.

    The rule is simple: if the manufacturer did not mention both models in the name, treat the case as incompatible. A complete overview of the differences between generations can be found in the comparison of Galaxy S26 FE and S25 FE.

    Are you sticking with the predecessor? Then the right place is the category of cases for Galaxy S25 FE and our separate ranking of cases for S25 FE.

    What else to pay attention to when choosing a case for the Galaxy S26 FE

    Material. TPU is a flexible material that absorbs impacts and is easy to put on. Polycarbonate is rigid, does not yellow, and better maintains transparency. The best cases combine both: a soft TPU frame plus a hard back.

    Drop certification. Look for a specific number, not a slogan. “Military Grade” without a specified height means nothing, while “26 drops from 1.26 m” does.

    Camera island protection. The camera module protrudes above the back and is the first to touch the surface. The raised frame around the island is more important than the edge near the screen.

    Weight. The S26 FE weighs 193 g, and an armored case raises the total to over 230 g. That’s almost 40 g more, so decide whether you’re swapping a slim phone for a protected one.

    TOP 10 best cases for the Galaxy S26 FE

    Only cases with magnets, which the phone does not have, made it to the top ten. The order within it was determined by three criteria: protection confirmed by drop testing, the ratio of protection to thickness, and availability on hand. All ten items are in stock. The offer for this model does not include ESR, UAG, or Supcase, so the ranking is based on Spigen, 3mk, Ringke, Tech-Protect, Samsung cases, and Bison.

    1. Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag MagSafe: hybrid with magnets

    Our overall choice

    Classic hybrid construction: flexible TPU frame absorbs shock, rigid polycarbonate back maintains shape and does not warp. Plus, a built-in magnetic ring, exactly what the phone itself is missing.

    The Frost Black finish is a matte mist that does not collect fingerprints. The Clear/White version shows the color of the phone case.

    Spigen maintains a slim profile here, despite the magnets in the back. This is a rare combination, as the ring usually adds bulk.

    For whom: for most people. If you want one case that adds magnets and does not turn the phone into a brick, this is the choice.

    2. 3mk Fortis MagCase: the toughest data on durability

    There are no marketing clichés here, just a number: 26 drops from 1.26 m, zero damage, confirmed by the MIL-STD-810H standard. This is the most concrete declaration of durability in the entire category.

    The cushioning is provided by Adaptive Shock Technology, which is an internal layer of microcellular foam. The construction is polycarbonate with TPU, featuring a magnetic ring on the back.

    This is the most armored case for Galaxy S26 FE in our offer. If you want to understand how armored cases differ from each other, we have a separate text on that.

    Con: this is the thickest option in the comparison. The phone no longer looks like a Galaxy S26 FE.

    3. Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe: transparent with certification

    Hybrid of polycarbonate and TPU, with a magnetic ring and Mil-Grade certification. The polycarbonate back yellows noticeably slower than pure TPU, which in a transparent case can become cloudy after just a few months.

    A detail that most competitors lack: cutout for lanyard. With a phone weighing 193 g, a wrist strap is a real protection against dropping.

    For whom: if you want to see the color of the phone and have magnets in one.

    [hs_products ids=”143104,143260,142962″ cols=”3″ title=”Top three places in the ranking”]

    4. 3mk Armor MagCase: armored, yet still slim

    A compromise between the first and second position. Polycarbonate with TPU thickness of 1.5 mm and a magnetic ring included. Military Grade standard, drop tests from about 175 cm.

    Reinforced corners absorb impact energy, as they are the first to touch the ground when falling on the edge. The buttons operate with EasyClick technology, meaning they retain a tactile click.

    For whom: if you want protection close to armored, but without the thickness of Fortis.

    5. Tech-Protect MagFlex MagSafe: the simplest way to magnets

    If magnets are the only thing you’re looking for, this is the shortest path to your goal. A flexible case with a magnetic ring and colorful frame, available in two finishes: shiny black and shiny gold.

    There is no drop certification or reinforced corners here. Instead, there is exactly the feature that the phone lacks.

    For whom: if you charge on Qi2 or use a magnetic mount, and protection is a secondary concern.

    6. 3mk Misty MagCase: matte, in four colors

    TPU with polycarbonate elements, built-in magnetic ring, and matte finish that reduces fingerprints. Raised edges protect the screen and camera.

    Four colors to choose from: black, blue, green, and pink. A rarity in this category, as cases with magnets are usually either black or transparent.

    For whom: if you want magnets, a matte texture, and a color other than black.

    [hs_products ids=”142725,143303,143261″ cols=”3″ title=”Armored, magnetic, and matte: positions 4-6″]

    7. Samsung Silicone Magnet: original, silicone

    Case from Samsung itself, made of silicone and with magnets. Silicone feels nicer to the touch than TPU and practically doesn’t slip, which matters at 193 g.

    The advantage of originals is one and specific: the magnets are arranged exactly as the phone manufacturer intended, so the charger centers itself without searching for a position.

    Available in four colors: black, mint, blue-purple, and pink.

    Con: silicone attracts dust and fibers from pockets. For comparable protection from independent brands, you will pay significantly less.

    8. Samsung Slim Magnet: original, thinnest

    The thinnest case with magnets in this comparison and the second position from Samsung. Three colors: black, mint, and blue-purple.

    This case is for someone who bought the S26 FE for its slimness and doesn’t want to lose it. The protection is symbolic, but the magnets sit exactly where Samsung intended.

    For whom: if the priority is to maintain the phone’s silhouette rather than protection in case of a fall.

    9. 3mk Wallet Case: with a flap and card pockets

    The only case in the ranking that protects the screen without adding glass. Eco-leather with flexible TPU, interior lined with microfiber, from two to three card pockets, and a flap with magnetic closure.

    The flap also serves as a stand in horizontal mode, so you can watch a movie on the train without holding the phone. The manufacturer describes the design as 360-degree protection.

    We have gathered more options of this type in the text about cases and wallets in one.

    Con: the magnetic closure of the flap is not the same as a charging ring. This case will not stick magnetically on a Qi2 charger.

    10. Bizon Case MatteO: also fits S25 FE

    This brings us back to the topic from the beginning of the article. Bizon describes this case as fitting both Galaxy S26 FE and S25 FE. This is the manufacturer’s declaration, not our speculation.

    The construction is flexible, with a magnetic ring and a smoky, matte finish.

    For whom: if you have both phones at home or are planning to switch and want one case to transition between generations.

    [hs_products ids=”143115,143119,142732,143245″ cols=”4″ title=”Positions 7-10 in the ranking”]

    Two cases from our offer do not have magnets and therefore did not make it to the top ten, but they make sense if you charge exclusively with a cable. Spigen Ultra Hybrid Crystal Clear is the same hybrid as in the first position, just without the ring, so the phone’s color is visible the clearest. Bizon Case Angelo is the simplest entry into protection and also fits both FE generations.

    Samsung Galaxy S26 FE Cases: comparison of the top ten in a table

    #CaseMaterialMagnetsDrop TestFeature
    1Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag MagSafeTPU + PCslim profile with magnets
    23mk Fortis MagCasePC + TPUMIL-STD-810H, 26 × 1.26 mAdaptive Shock Technology
    3Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafePC + TPUMil-Gradecutout for lanyard
    43mk Armor MagCasePC + TPU, 1.5 mmMilitary Grade, ~175 cmreinforced corners
    5Tech-Protect MagFlex MagSafeflexible TPUcolorful frame
    63mk Misty MagCaseTPU + PCfour colors
    7Samsung Silicone Magnetsiliconeoriginal, four colors
    8Samsung Slim Magnetmanufacturer does not specifythinnest with magnets
    93mk Wallet Caseeco-leather + TPUonly flap closurecards, stand, 360° protection
    10Bizon Case MatteOflexible TPUcompatibility with S26 FE and S25 FE

    Which case to choose for Samsung Galaxy S26 FE? Recommendations based on needs

    • You want one case for everything: Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag MagSafe. Magnets, hybrid construction, slim profile.
    • Looking for a rugged case for the Galaxy S26 FE: 3mk Fortis MagCase, the only one with MIL-STD-810H certification and a specified number of drops.
    • Looking for a transparent case for the Galaxy S26 FE: Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe, transparent polycarbonate with magnets and Mil-Grade certification.
    • Only interested in magnets: Tech-Protect MagFlex MagSafe.
    • Want a case with a flap and card slots: 3mk Wallet Case, the only one in the top ten that covers the screen.
    • Prefer the original from Samsung: Silicone Magnet for grip, Slim Magnet for slimness.
    • Have both S25 FE and S26 FE at home: Bizon Case MatteO, with a declaration of compatibility with both generations.
    • Don’t want the color black: 3mk Misty MagCase in four colors or Samsung Silicone Magnet.

    What to complement the case for the Galaxy S26 FE

    No case from the top ten, except for the 3mk Wallet Case, covers the screen. Raised edges protect the display when dropped flat, but not from scratches.

    The display is the same as in its predecessor, but no glass manufacturer declares compatibility with both models. The outline of the glass is designed for a specific body, so it is a separate purchase, not a transfer of an accessory.

    There are three sensible options available for this model. Spigen GLAStR EZ Fit Pro has an applicator that practically eliminates bubbles, Tech-Protect Glass Fit comes in a pack of two, and 3mk HardGlass is the simplest variant from a Polish brand.

    [hs_products ids=”143219,142974,141337,143122″ cols=”4″ title=”Tempered glasses and film for Galaxy S26 FE”]

    There is also a matte Samsung Anti-Reflecting film if you prefer to reduce light reflections instead of hardness.

    One piece of advice regardless of the glass brand: install it in the bathroom right after bathing. The steam will collect dust from the air, and dust under the glass is the most common cause of unsuccessful installation.

    Summary: TOP 10 cases for Galaxy S26 FE at a glance

    1. Galaxy S26 FE does not have magnets. It charges on Qi2 with a power of 15 W, but without a case with a magnetic ring, the charger will not center itself, and the magnetic holder will not hold the phone. This is the most important criterion for this model.
    2. Case from S25 FE only fits if the manufacturer has replaced both models. Rigid cases are out due to the redesigned camera island; Bizon claims compatibility with both models for its flexible lines.
    3. The most universal choice is Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag MagSafe. A hybrid of TPU and polycarbonate with magnets and a slim profile.
    4. If protection is the only concern, choose 3mk Fortis MagCase. MIL-STD-810H and 26 drops from 1.26 m without damage.
    5. Glass is a separate purchase. The display has not changed, but no manufacturer describes the glass as compatible with both generations.

    See the full range of cases for Samsung Galaxy S26 FE at homescreen.pl →

    FAQ: frequently asked questions about cases for Galaxy S26 FE

    Does the case from Galaxy S25 FE fit S26 FE?

    No, the camera island has been redesigned and the cutouts do not align in the same place. Flexible cases only fit if the manufacturer includes both models in the name, as Bizon does.

    Does Galaxy S26 FE have magnets like MagSafe?

    No. The phone supports Qi2 charging at 15 W, but it does not have built-in magnets. A magnetic ring must be present in the case.

    Which case for Galaxy S26 FE is the most durable?

    3mk Fortis MagCase with MIL-STD-810H standard, which has survived 26 drops from a height of 1.26 m without damage. An alternative is the 3mk Armor MagCase tested from about 175 cm.

    Is it worth buying the original Samsung case for Galaxy S26 FE?

    Originals have magnets placed exactly according to the phone manufacturer’s design, which provides the most reliable centering of the charger. However, they cost significantly more than cases from independent brands that offer comparable protection.

    Which company makes the best phone case?

    There is no single best brand; it depends on the needs. Spigen and Ringke make the best hybrids for everyday use, 3mk has the strongest drop certification, and Samsung originals have the most reliably placed magnets.

    What material is the best case for the Galaxy S26 FE?

    Hybrid: flexible TPU frame plus rigid polycarbonate back. TPU absorbs impact energy, while polycarbonate does not warp and does not yellow as quickly as pure TPU.

    Which case is better: silicone or TPU?

    Silicone feels nicer to the touch and is less slippery, but it attracts dust and fibers. TPU better absorbs falls and does not stretch over time.

    Does a flip case work with wireless charging?

    It works, but the magnetic closure of the flap is not the same as a charging ring. A wallet case will charge inductively, but it will not stick magnetically to a Qi2 charger.

    When was the Galaxy S26 FE released?

    Samsung unveiled the phone on August 27, 2026, and sales began on September 4, 2026. Prices start at 799 EUR, which is about 3,490 PLN for the 128 GB version.

    Does the glass from the Galaxy S25 FE fit the S26 FE?

    The diagonal and resolution are identical, but manufacturers do not declare compatibility with both models, and the glass outline is cut for a specific body. Buy glass described as for the Galaxy S26 FE.

    Sources: official announcement of the Galaxy S26 FE on Samsung Global Newsroom, full specifications sheet on GSMArena, analysis of the lack of magnets in the Galaxy S26 series on SamMobile

  • Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE: what has really changed?

    In comparison, the Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE differences come down to three things: the Exynos 2500 processor instead of 2400, the One UI 9 system instead of One UI 8, and a USB port that has reverted to version 2.0. The screen, all three cameras, selfie, and the 4,900 mAh battery are identical.

    The S26 FE was launched on August 27, 2026, and sales start on September 4.

    Place both phones side by side, and you won’t distinguish them without looking into the settings. Samsung has transferred almost all the hardware from last year and raised the price.

    Below is the complete table of both models, resolving the circulating rumor about the silicon-carbon battery, which is even repeated in the specification tables, and a section on accessories: what fits which model and why the case from the S25 FE won’t fit the S26 FE.

    When each model was released

    Both phones debuted at the same time of year, less than twelve months apart. The Galaxy S25 FE had its premiere and sales start on the same day, while the S26 FE had a week gap between the two.

    Event Galaxy S25 FE Galaxy S26 FE
    Launch (announcement) September 4, 2025 August 27, 2026
    Sales start September 4, 2025 September 4, 2026
    Starting price (128 GB) 750 EUR 799 EUR
    System at launch One UI 8, Android 16 One UI 9, Android 17

    Galaxy S26 FE is now official. Samsung unveiled it on August 27, 2026, and immediately provided the full specifications and prices, so all the data in this article comes from the manufacturer, not leaks. The phone hits stores on September 4, 2026.

    Samsung S25 FE has been on sale for a year, and that changes the entire calculation. Remember this for the pricing section, as that’s where the most significant difference between these models lies.

    Accessories for both generations are available immediately. See the Galaxy S26 FE category →

    Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE: full comparison table

    We have bolded only those items that actually differ.

    Parameter Galaxy S25 FE Galaxy S26 FE
    Processor Exynos 2400 (4 nm) Exynos 2500 (3 nm)
    Graphics Chip Xclipse 940 Xclipse 950
    RAM 8 GB 8 GB
    Storage 128 / 256 / 512 GB, UFS 4.0 128 / 256 / 512 GB, UFS 4.0
    Screen 6.7″, Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.7″, Dynamic AMOLED 2X
    Resolution 1080 × 2340 (385 ppi) 1080 × 2340 (385 ppi)
    Refresh Rate 60–120 Hz 60–120 Hz
    Peak Brightness 1,900 nits 1,900 nits
    Glass Gorilla Glass Victus+ Gorilla Glass Victus+
    Main Camera 50 MP, f/1.8, OIS 50 MP, f/1.8, OIS
    Ultrawide 12 MP, f/2.2, 123° 12 MP, f/2.2, 123°
    Telephoto 8 MP, 3× zoom, OIS 8 MP, 3× zoom, OIS
    Selfie 12 MP, f/2.2 12 MP, f/2.2
    Video 8K 30 fps, 4K 120 fps 8K 30 fps, 4K 120 fps
    Battery 4,900 mAh, Li-Ion 4,900 mAh, Li-Ion
    Wired Charging 45 W (65% in 30 min) 45 W (69% in 30 min)
    Wireless Charging 15 W, Qi2 compatible 15 W, Qi2 compatible
    Certified Charging Cycles 2,000 1,200
    USB-C Port USB 3.2 Gen 1 USB 2.0
    Dimensions 161.3 × 76.6 × 7.4 mm 161.6 × 76.9 × 7.4 mm
    Weight 190 g 193 g
    Frame aluminum aluminum
    Resistance IP68 IP68
    Operating System at Launch One UI 8, Android 16 One UI 9, Android 17
    Colors Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White Graphite, Pistachio, Blueberry

    Nine different items out of twenty-five. Of these, five are cosmetics (dimensions, weight, colors, charging speed, One UI version number), two are steps backward, and the performance gain comes from the processor along with the graphics unit.

    What does Exynos 2500 offer in everyday use?

    Exynos 2500 is the only noticeable change in daily use. The chip is built on the second generation of the 3 nm GAA process, while Exynos 2400 in the S25 FE used 4 nm.

    Performance gain according to Samsung:

    • About 30% faster processor (CPU) and graphics unit (GPU)
    • About 40% faster NPU, responsible for Galaxy AI functions
    • Newer main core: Cortex-X925 instead of Cortex-X4
    • Newer graphics unit: Xclipse 950 instead of Xclipse 940

    The NPU is more important here than it looks on paper. It calculates Galaxy AI functions, such as summaries, real-time translations, and photo processing. If you actually use Galaxy AI, it is the biggest difference in the entire comparison.

    Note: 30% on paper does not mean a 30% faster phone. Both models perform practically the same in everyday tasks, such as browsing, social media, and photos. The difference reveals itself in gaming and under prolonged load.

    The screen and cameras remain unchanged

    There is nothing to write about here, and that is the most important information.

    The screen parameters are identical: 6.7 inches, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 1080 × 2340, refresh rate from 60 to 120 Hz, declared brightness of 1,900 nits, Gorilla Glass Victus+.

    The camera setup is identical, sensor by sensor:

    • Main 50 MP, f/1.8, with optical stabilization (OIS)
    • Ultrawide 12 MP, f/2.2, 123° field of view
    • Telephoto 8 MP, 3× optical zoom, with OIS
    • Selfie 12 MP, f/2.2

    Video recording is also unchanged: 8K at 30 fps and 4K at 120 fps in both models.

    The sensors are the same, but the photos go through a newer image signal processor (ISP), so Samsung promises slightly better dynamic range in low light. That’s the only thing that actually changes in the cameras.

    New in the S26 FE are only software features: My FanCam (automatically keeping a selected person in the frame, previously available only in foldable models) and Super Steady with horizon lock. This is software that Samsung may also make available to the older model in the future.

    Battery unchanged and without silicon-carbon cell

    Both phones have 4,900 mAh, the same wired charging power of 45 W and wireless charging of 15 W.

    There are rumors that the Samsung S26 FE received a silicon-carbon battery. This is not confirmed. Samsung does not mention this technology in the official specification, and SamMobile explicitly states it has a regular lithium-ion cell. However, some databases, including GSMArena, label the cell as Si/C.

    There is no decision from the manufacturer. What is certain, however, is that silicon-carbon will only be available in foldable models: Galaxy Z Flip 8, Z Fold 8, and Z Fold 8 Ultra in July 2026.

    The real gain during operation comes not from the battery, but from the more efficient 3 nm processor. Samsung claims about an hour longer video playback, and the EU energy label states 50 hours of operation compared to 42.5 hours in the S25 FE and class A instead of B.

    The difference in charging is cosmetic: 69% in 30 minutes compared to 65% in the S25 FE. Four percentage points.

    Hidden downside: the battery will last fewer cycles

    This is not advertised by Samsung, and it directly results from the EU energy label. The battery in the S26 FE is certified for 1,200 charging cycles, while in the S25 FE it is 2,000. A cycle is a full charge from zero to one hundred percent; after exceeding this limit, the battery retains less than 80% of its original capacity.

    In practice, 1,200 cycles still means several years of normal use. However, it is worth knowing that with seven years of system support, the battery will deplete its certified reserve much earlier than the updates.

    To achieve full 45 W, both models require the same USB Power Delivery charger (USB PD) with a power of at least 45 W. When buying accessories, you do not need to distinguish between generations.

    USB port is the first step backward

    Galaxy S26 FE has a USB-C port in the 2.0 standard, while the S25 FE had USB 3.2 Gen 1. This is the second point, alongside battery life, where the newer model performs worse than its predecessor.

    Charging works at the same speed, as power does not depend on the version of the data standard. Only file transfer is slower.

    The scale of this difference is impressive only when looking at specifics. A minute of 8K video weighs several hundred megabytes, so an hour of footage amounts to several dozen gigabytes. With USB 3.2 Gen 1, you can transfer it in a few minutes, while with USB 2.0, the phone will remain connected to the computer for significantly longer.

    If you use the cloud or transfer photos wirelessly, you won’t notice the difference.

    System and updates, or the difference of one year

    Galaxy S26 FE starts with One UI 9 on Android 17, while S25 FE debuted with One UI 8 on Android 16.

    Both generations have the same support policy: seven generations of Android and seven years of security patches. However, since the S26 FE starts a year later, its support ends a year later.

    This is a real advantage of the newer model, although in practice it means choosing between a phone supported until 2032 and one supported until 2033. The S25 FE will still receive One UI 9 in an update.

    This is where the real difference between the models lies

    The starting prices of both models in Europe:

    Version Galaxy S25 FE at launch Galaxy S26 FE at launch
    8 GB / 128 GB 750 EUR 799 EUR
    8 GB / 256 GB 810 EUR 899 EUR
    8 GB / 512 GB 930 EUR 1,099 EUR

    Samsung S26 FE is more expensive at every memory level. The increase grows with capacity: 49 EUR for the base version, 89 EUR for 256 GB, and as much as 169 EUR for 512 GB.

    However, something else is key. The Galaxy S25 FE has been on the market for a year and has clearly dropped in price. The actual level of reduction depends on the store and promotions, but you can buy the older model today noticeably cheaper than on the day of its release, while the S26 FE is just starting with the full price list.

    Combine this with the specification table: you get the same screen, the same camera setup, the same battery, and a faster USB port, paying significantly less. For most people, the Galaxy S25 FE is a more sensible purchase today.

    Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE: which one to choose?

    Choose Galaxy S26 FE if:

    • You regularly use Galaxy AI features, as the NPU has gained the most here.
    • You game and want power reserve for a few years ahead.
    • You care about the longest possible support, until 2033.
    • You are buying a phone for six or seven years and the price difference spreads over that period.

    Choose Galaxy S25 FE if:

    • You are looking at the price-to-performance ratio. The screen, cameras, and battery are identical, and you pay significantly less.
    • You transfer large files via cable, as only this model has a fast USB 3.2 Gen 1 port.
    • You do not use AI features intensively enough to feel the faster NPU.

    Our choice: given the current price difference, the Galaxy S25 FE wins for most buyers. The Galaxy S26 FE makes sense if you plan to keep the phone until the end of the support period or heavily use Galaxy AI.

    If you are considering stronger models from this family, we have compared them in the article Galaxy S26 Ultra vs S25 Ultra.

    Accessories: does the case from Galaxy S25 FE fit the S26 FE?

    It does not fit and it is not worth trying. This is the first question that arises when changing generations, and here the answer is clear.

    The difference in dimensions is 0.3 mm in height and 0.3 mm in width, and according to Android Authority, Samsung has slightly redesigned the camera island as well. The thickness is identical (7.4 mm), so a soft case from the predecessor can often be stretched, but:

    • The cutouts for the camera do not align in the same place. With the changed island, part of the lens may be covered.
    • The buttons do not align with the cutouts, making clicking uncomfortable.
    • Rigid cases crack at the corner when trying to stretch them.

    It’s the same with tempered glasses. The diagonal and resolution haven’t changed, but the 0.3 mm wider front means that the glass for the S25 FE won’t cover the screen evenly, and the glue will partially hit the edge.

    Note: manufacturers released dedicated versions for the S26 FE even before the phone went on sale, so there’s no reason to compromise. Choose accessories described exactly by the model you have.

    Magnets: a common problem for both generations

    Neither the Galaxy S25 FE nor the S26 FE have built-in magnets. Both charge wirelessly using the Qi2 standard at 15 W, but neither will stick to the charger or holder by itself.

    In both cases, the solution is the same: a case with a magnetic ring. You put it on, and the phone starts to hold onto Qi2 chargers, magnetic power banks, car mounts, and card wallets. We described the same mechanism with the iPhone 16e without MagSafe.

    Magnetic accessories compatible with both models can be found in the categories of induction chargers and MagSafe accessories.

    Accessories for the Galaxy S26 FE

    Cases and glasses for the new model arrived in stock before the phone even appeared in stores.

    Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag MagSafe

    What it fits: Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag, if you care about magnets.

    The case combines rigid polycarbonate (PC) back with a flexible TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) frame, and adds a magnetic ring that is missing on the phone itself. The Frost Black version has a matte, smoky back, on which fingerprints are much less visible than on the glossy variant.

    Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe

    The transparent case has magnets and a raised edge around the camera island. A good choice if you are buying the Pistachio or Blueberry color and want to see it.

    Tech-Protect Glass Fit+

    Gorilla Glass Victus+ protects the screen from scratches, but not from cracking upon impact. Replacing the display at a service center costs hundreds of zlotys, while tempered glass is a fraction of that amount. Glass Fit+ comes in a set of two pieces with a mounting frame.

    [hs_products category=”2578″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Accessories for Galaxy S26 FE”]

    Accessories for Galaxy S25 FE

    Samsung S25 FE has been on the market for a year, so the selection is much broader: the case category alone has over a hundred items. We have compiled a complete ranking in a separate article about the best cases for Galaxy S25 FE.

    UAG Scout MagSafe

    Armored construction with magnets and MIL-STD-810G certification. UAG makes cases thicker than Spigen, but it is this thickness that protects when dropped on the edge.

    Tech-Protect Magflex MagSafe

    This is a thinner alternative to armored constructions, also with a magnetic ring. It will work if you don’t want the case to add bulk to the phone.

    Spigen Glas.tR EZ Fit Pro

    The EZ Fit system is one of the best-designed: the frame positions the glass itself, so even application is usually successful on the first try. The set includes two pieces.

    [hs_products category=”1954″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Cases for Galaxy S25 FE”]

    Summary

    Galaxy S26 FE is a remarkably cautious update. Samsung has transferred almost all the hardware from its predecessor. The processor, operating system, and USB port have changed. The screen, all cameras, and battery have been carried over unchanged.

    Three things worth remembering:

    1. Real profit comes only from the processor. The Exynos 2500 is about 30% faster in CPU and GPU and 40% in NPU, which is mainly noticeable in games and Galaxy AI features.
    2. There are two steps back, not one. The USB port has reverted to version 2.0, and the certified battery lifespan has dropped from 2,000 to 1,200 charging cycles.
    3. The price tips the scales in favor of the S25 FE. With the same screen, cameras, and battery, the older model is clearly cheaper today.

    Regardless of the choice, both phones are worth equipping with the same: a case with a magnetic ring, as neither has built-in magnets, and tempered glass, as Gorilla Glass Victus+ protects against scratches, not drops.

    Sources: official announcement of Galaxy S26 FE on Samsung Global Newsroom, comparison of S26 FE and S25 FE on SamMobile, explanation of the silicon-carbon battery issue on SamMobile, specification sheet for Galaxy S26 FE on GSMArena, price comparison of both generations on GSMArena, new camera features and One UI 9 according to Android Authority, EU energy label for Galaxy S26 FE on GSMArena, analysis of the decrease in charging cycles on Android Authority

    FAQ: Galaxy S26 FE and S25 FE

    Is it worth paying extra for the Galaxy S26 FE?

    Usually not. The screen, all three cameras, and the battery are identical to those in the S25 FE, and the newer model has a slower USB port. Paying extra makes sense if you heavily use Galaxy AI or want the longest support, which is until 2033.

    When is the release of Galaxy S26 FE and when does sales start?

    The premiere took place on August 27, 2026, when Samsung showcased the phone and provided the full specifications. Sales start on September 4, 2026.

    What distinguishes the Galaxy S26 FE from the S25 FE?

    Three things: the processor (Exynos 2500 in 3 nm instead of Exynos 2400 in 4 nm), the operating system at launch (One UI 9 on Android 17 instead of One UI 8), and the USB port, which has reverted from 3.2 Gen 1 to 2.0. The screen, cameras, selfie, and 4,900 mAh battery are identical.

    Does the Galaxy S26 FE have a silicon-carbon battery?

    There is no confirmation from the manufacturer. Samsung does not mention silicon-carbon in the official specifications, and SamMobile writes about a regular lithium-ion cell of 4,900 mAh, although some databases label it as Si/C. It is certain that in July 2026, this technology was only available in foldable models: Z Flip 8, Z Fold 8, and Z Fold 8 Ultra.

    Does the case from the Galaxy S25 FE fit the S26 FE?

    No. The new model is 0.3 mm taller and wider, and the camera island has been slightly redesigned. The cutouts for the camera and buttons do not align in the same place, so you need a case dedicated to the specific model.

    Does the Galaxy S26 FE have magnets for MagSafe?

    No, just like the S25 FE. Both phones charge wirelessly in the Qi2 standard at 15 W, but do not have a built-in ring of magnets. The magnets are added by the case, for example, the Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag or UAG Scout MagSafe.

    Which phone has a longer battery life?

    Galaxy S26 FE, but the difference is small. The capacity is identical (4,900 mAh), and the gain comes from the more efficient 3 nm processor. Samsung claims about an hour longer video playback.

  • Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE: what has really changed?

    Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE: what has really changed?

    In comparison, the Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE differences come down to three things: the Exynos 2500 processor instead of the 2400, the One UI 9 system instead of One UI 8, and a USB port that has reverted to version 2.0. The screen, all three cameras, selfie, and the 4,900 mAh battery are identical.

    The S26 FE was launched on August 27, 2026, and sales start on September 4.

    Place both phones side by side, and you won’t distinguish them without looking into the settings. Samsung has transferred almost all the hardware from last year and raised the price.

    Below is the complete table of both models, the resolution of the circulating rumor about the silicon-carbon battery, which is even repeated in the specification tables, and a section about accessories: what fits which model and why the case from the S25 FE won’t fit the S26 FE.

    When each model was released

    Both phones debuted at the same time of year, less than twelve months apart. The Galaxy S25 FE had its premiere and sales start on the same day, while the S26 FE had a week break between the two.

    EventGalaxy S25 FEGalaxy S26 FE
    Launch (announcement)September 4, 2025August 27, 2026
    Sales startSeptember 4, 2025September 4, 2026
    Starting price (128 GB)750 EUR799 EUR
    System at launchOne UI 8, Android 16One UI 9, Android 17

    Galaxy S26 FE is now official. Samsung unveiled it on August 27, 2026, and immediately provided the full specifications and prices, so all the data in this article comes from the manufacturer, not leaks. The phone hits stores on September 4, 2026.

    Samsung S25 FE has been on sale for a year, which changes the entire calculation. Remember this for the price section, as this is where the most important difference between these models lies.

    Accessories for both generations are readily available. See the Galaxy S26 FE category →

    Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE: full comparison table

    We have bolded only those items that actually differ.

    ParameterGalaxy S25 FEGalaxy S26 FE
    ProcessorExynos 2400 (4 nm)Exynos 2500 (3 nm)
    GraphicsXclipse 940Xclipse 950
    RAM8 GB8 GB
    Storage128 / 256 / 512 GB, UFS 4.0128 / 256 / 512 GB, UFS 4.0
    Screen6.7″, Dynamic AMOLED 2X6.7″, Dynamic AMOLED 2X
    Resolution1080 × 2340 (385 ppi)1080 × 2340 (385 ppi)
    Refresh Rate60–120 Hz60–120 Hz
    Peak Brightness1,900 nits1,900 nits
    GlassGorilla Glass Victus+Gorilla Glass Victus+
    Main Camera50 MP, f/1.8, OIS50 MP, f/1.8, OIS
    Ultrawide12 MP, f/2.2, 123°12 MP, f/2.2, 123°
    Telephoto8 MP, 3× zoom, OIS8 MP, 3× zoom, OIS
    Selfie12 MP, f/2.212 MP, f/2.2
    Video8K 30 fps, 4K 120 fps8K 30 fps, 4K 120 fps
    Battery4,900 mAh, Li-Ion4,900 mAh, Li-Ion
    Wired Charging45 W (65% in 30 min)45 W (69% in 30 min)
    Wireless Charging15 W, Qi2 compatible15 W, Qi2 compatible
    Certified Charge Cycles2,0001,200
    USB-C PortUSB 3.2 Gen 1USB 2.0
    Dimensions161.3 × 76.6 × 7.4 mm161.6 × 76.9 × 7.4 mm
    Weight190 g193 g
    Framealuminumaluminum
    ResistanceIP68IP68
    Operating System at LaunchOne UI 8, Android 16One UI 9, Android 17
    ColorsIcyblue, Jetblack, Navy, WhiteGraphite, Pistachio, Blueberry

    Nine different positions out of twenty-five. Of these, five are cosmetic (dimensions, weight, colors, charging speed, version number of One UI), two are steps backward, and the performance gain comes from the processor along with the graphics unit.

    What does Exynos 2500 offer in everyday use?

    Exynos 2500 is the only noticeable change in daily use. The chip is built on the second generation of the 3 nm GAA process, while the Exynos 2400 in the S25 FE used 4 nm.

    Performance gain according to Samsung:

    • About 30% faster processor (CPU) and graphics unit (GPU)
    • About 40% faster NPU, responsible for Galaxy AI functions
    • Newer main core: Cortex-X925 instead of Cortex-X4
    • Newer graphics unit: Xclipse 950 instead of Xclipse 940

    NPU is more important here than it looks on paper. It counts the Galaxy AI functions, such as summaries, real-time translations, and photo processing. If you actually use Galaxy AI, then the biggest difference in the entire comparison.

    Note: 30% on paper does not mean a 30% faster phone. Both models perform practically the same in everyday tasks, such as browsing, social media, and photos. The difference reveals itself in gaming and under prolonged load.

    The screen and cameras remain unchanged

    There is nothing to write about here, and that is the most important information.

    The screen parameters are identical: 6.7 inches, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 1080 × 2340, refresh rate from 60 to 120 Hz, declared brightness of 1,900 nits, Gorilla Glass Victus+.

    The camera setup is identical, sensor by sensor:

    • Main 50 MP, f/1.8, with optical stabilization (OIS)
    • Ultrawide 12 MP, f/2.2, field of view 123°
    • Telephoto 8 MP, 3× optical zoom, with OIS
    • Selfie 12 MP, f/2.2

    Video recording is also unchanged: 8K at 30 fps and 4K at 120 fps in both models.

    The sensors are the same, but the photos go through a newer image signal processor (ISP), so Samsung promises slightly better dynamic range in low light. That’s the only thing that actually changes in the cameras.

    New in the S26 FE are only software features: My FanCam (automatically keeping a selected person in the frame, previously available only in foldable models) and Super Steady with level lock. This is software that Samsung may also make available to older models in the future.

    Battery unchanged and without silicon-carbon cell

    Both phones have 4,900 mAh, the same wired charging power of 45 W and wireless charging of 15 W.

    There are rumors that the Samsung S26 FE received a silicon-carbon battery. It is not confirmed. Samsung does not mention this technology in the official specifications, and SamMobile explicitly states it has a regular lithium-ion cell. However, some databases, including GSMArena, label the cell as Si/C.

    There is no resolution from the manufacturer. However, it is certain that silicon-carbon was introduced in July 2026 exclusively to foldable models: Galaxy Z Flip 8, Z Fold 8, and Z Fold 8 Ultra.

    The real gain during operation comes not from the battery, but from the more efficient 3 nm processor. Samsung claims about an hour longer video playback, and the EU energy label states 50 hours of operation compared to 42.5 hours in the S25 FE and class A instead of B.

    The difference in charging is minimal: 69% in 30 minutes compared to 65% in the S25 FE. Four percentage points.

    Hidden downside: the battery will last fewer cycles

    This is not advertised by Samsung, and it directly results from the EU energy label. The battery in the S26 FE is certified for 1,200 charging cycles, while in the S25 FE it is 2,000. A cycle is a full charge from zero to one hundred percent; after exceeding this limit, the battery retains less than 80% of its original capacity.

    In practice, 1,200 cycles still means several years of normal use. However, it is worth knowing that with seven years of system support, the battery will deplete its certified reserve much earlier than the updates.

    To achieve the full 45 W, both models require the same USB Power Delivery charger (USB PD) with a power of at least 45 W. When buying accessories, you do not need to distinguish between generations.

    USB port is the first step backward

    The Galaxy S26 FE has a USB-C port in the 2.0 standard, while the S25 FE had USB 3.2 Gen 1. This is the second point, alongside battery life, where the newer model performs worse than its predecessor.

    Charging works just as quickly, as the power does not depend on the data standard version. Only the file transfer is slower.

    The scale of this difference only impresses when looking at specifics. A minute of 8K video weighs several hundred megabytes, so an hour of footage is several dozen gigabytes. With USB 3.2 Gen 1, you can transfer it in a few minutes; with USB 2.0, the phone will be connected to the computer for much longer.

    If you use the cloud or transfer photos wirelessly, you won’t notice the difference.

    System and updates, or the difference of one year

    The Galaxy S26 FE launches with One UI 9 on Android 17, while the S25 FE debuted with One UI 8 on Android 16.

    Both generations have the same support policy: seven generations of Android and seven years of security patches. However, since the S26 FE starts a year later, its support ends a year later.

    This is a real advantage of the newer model, although in practice it means choosing between a phone supported until 2032 and one supported until 2033. The S25 FE will still receive One UI 9 in an update.

    Here lies the real difference between the models

    The starting prices of both models in Europe:

    VersionGalaxy S25 FE at launchGalaxy S26 FE at launch
    8 GB / 128 GB750 EUR799 EUR
    8 GB / 256 GB810 EUR899 EUR
    8 GB / 512 GB930 EUR1,099 EUR

    Samsung S26 FE is more expensive at every memory level. The increase grows with capacity: 49 EUR for the base version, 89 EUR for 256 GB, and as much as 169 EUR for 512 GB.

    However, the key point is something else. The Galaxy S25 FE has been on the market for a year and has clearly dropped in price. The actual level of reduction depends on the store and promotions, but you can buy the older model today noticeably cheaper than on the day of its premiere, while the S26 FE is just starting out with the full price list.

    Combine this with the specifications table: you get the same screen, the same camera set, the same battery, and a faster USB port, paying significantly less. For most people, the Galaxy S25 FE is a more sensible purchase today.

    Galaxy S26 FE vs S25 FE: which one to choose?

    Choose the Galaxy S26 FE if:

    • You regularly use Galaxy AI features, as the NPU has gained the most here.
    • You game and want power reserves for a few years ahead.
    • You care about the longest possible support, which is until 2033.
    • You buy a phone for six or seven years and the price difference is spread over that period.

    Choose the Galaxy S25 FE if:

    • You are looking at the price-to-performance ratio. The screen, cameras, and battery are identical, and you pay significantly less.
    • You transfer large files via cable, because only this model has a fast USB 3.2 Gen 1 port.
    • You do not use AI features intensively enough to feel the faster NPU.

    Our choice: given today’s price difference, the Galaxy S25 FE wins for most buyers. The Galaxy S26 FE makes sense if you plan to keep the phone until the end of the support period or heavily use Galaxy AI.

    If you are considering stronger models from this family, we have compared them in the Galaxy S26 Ultra vs S25 Ultra comparison.

    Accessories: does the case from Galaxy S25 FE fit the S26 FE?

    It does not fit and it’s not worth trying. This is the first question that arises when changing generations, and here the answer is clear.

    The difference in dimensions is 0.3 mm in height and 0.3 mm in width, and according to Android Authority, Samsung has slightly redesigned the camera island. The thickness is identical (7.4 mm), so soft cases from the predecessor can often be stretched, but:

    • The camera cutouts do not align in the same place. With the changed island, part of the lens may be covered.
    • The buttons do not align with the cutouts, making clicking uncomfortable.
    • Rigid cases crack at the corners when attempting to stretch them.

    It’s the same with tempered glass. The diagonal and resolution have not changed, but the 0.3 mm wider front means that the glass for the S25 FE will not cover the screen evenly, and the adhesive will partially hit the edge.

    Note: manufacturers released dedicated versions for the S26 FE even before the phone went on sale, so there’s no reason to compromise. Choose accessories described exactly by the model you have.

    Magnets: a common problem for both generations

    Neither the Galaxy S25 FE nor the S26 FE have built-in magnets. Both charge wirelessly using the Qi2 standard at 15 W, but neither will attract itself to the charger or mount.

    In both cases, the solution is the same: case with a magnetic ring. You put it on, and the phone starts to hold onto Qi2 chargers, magnetic power banks, car mounts, and card wallets. We described the same mechanism with the iPhone 16e without MagSafe.

    Magnetic accessories compatible with both models can be found in the categories of induction chargers and MagSafe accessories.

    Accessories for Galaxy S26 FE

    Cases and glass for the new model arrived in stock before the phone even appeared in stores.

    Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag MagSafe

    What it suits: Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag, if you care about magnets.

    The case combines a rigid polycarbonate (PC) back with a flexible TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) frame, and adds a magnetic ring that is missing in the phone itself. The Frost Black version has a matte, smoky back, where fingerprints are much less visible than on the glossy variant.

    Ringke Fusion Magnetic MagSafe

    The transparent case has magnets and a raised edge around the camera island. A good choice if you’re buying the Pistachio or Blueberry color and want to see it.

    Tech-Protect Glass Fit+

    Gorilla Glass Victus+ protects the screen from scratches, but not from cracking upon impact. Replacing the display at a service center costs hundreds of zlotys, while tempered glass is a fraction of that price. Glass Fit+ comes in a set of two pieces with an installation frame.

    [hs_products category=”2578″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Accessories for Galaxy S26 FE”]

    Accessories for Galaxy S25 FE

    The Samsung S25 FE has been on the market for a year, so the selection is much broader: the case category alone has over a hundred items. We have compiled a full ranking in a separate article about the best cases for Galaxy S25 FE.

    UAG Scout MagSafe

    Armored construction with magnets and MIL-STD-810G certification. UAG makes cases thicker than Spigen, but it is this thickness that protects during edge drops.

    Tech-Protect Magflex MagSafe

    This is a thinner alternative to armored constructions, also with a magnetic ring. It will work well if you don’t want the case to add bulk to your phone.

    Spigen Glas.tR EZ Fit Pro

    The EZ Fit system is one of the best-designed: the frame positions the glass itself, so even application is usually successful on the first try. The set includes two pieces.

    [hs_products category=”1954″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Cases for Galaxy S25 FE”]

    Summary

    Galaxy S26 FE is a remarkably cautious update. Samsung has transferred almost all the hardware from its predecessor. The processor, system, and USB port have changed. The screen, all cameras, and battery have been carried over unchanged.

    Three things worth remembering:

    1. The real gain comes only from the processor. Exynos 2500 is about 30% faster in CPU and GPU and 40% in NPU, which is mainly noticeable in games and Galaxy AI features.
    2. There are two steps back, not one. The USB port has reverted to version 2.0, and the certified battery lifespan has dropped from 2,000 to 1,200 charging cycles.
    3. The price tips the scales in favor of S25 FE. With the same screen, cameras, and battery, the older model is clearly cheaper today.

    Regardless of the choice, both phones are worth complementing with the same: a case with a magnetic ring, as neither has built-in magnets, and tempered glass, as Gorilla Glass Victus+ protects against scratches, not drops.

    Sources: official announcement of Galaxy S26 FE in Samsung Global Newsroom, comparison of S26 FE and S25 FE on SamMobile, explanation of the silicon-carbon battery issue on SamMobile, specification sheet for Galaxy S26 FE on GSMArena, price comparison of both generations on GSMArena, new camera features and One UI 9 according to Android Authority, EU energy label for Galaxy S26 FE on GSMArena, analysis of the decrease in charging cycles on Android Authority

    FAQ: Galaxy S26 FE and S25 FE

    Is it worth paying extra for Galaxy S26 FE?

    Usually not. The screen, all three cameras, and the battery are identical to the S25 FE, and the newer model has a slower USB port. The extra cost makes sense if you heavily use Galaxy AI or want the longest support, which is until 2033.

    When is the Galaxy S26 FE premiere and when does sales start?

    The premiere took place on August 27, 2026, when Samsung showcased the phone and provided the full specifications. Sales start on September 4, 2026.

    What are the differences between Galaxy S26 FE and S25 FE?

    Three things: the processor (Exynos 2500 in 3 nm instead of Exynos 2400 in 4 nm), the operating system at launch (One UI 9 on Android 17 instead of One UI 8), and the USB port, which has downgraded from 3.2 Gen 1 to 2.0. The screen, cameras, selfie, and 4,900 mAh battery are identical.

    Does the Galaxy S26 FE have a silicon-carbon battery?

    There is no confirmation from the manufacturer. Samsung does not list silicon-carbon in the official specifications, and SamMobile mentions a regular lithium-ion cell of 4,900 mAh, although some databases label it as Si/C. It is certain that in July 2026, this technology was only available in foldable models: Z Flip 8, Z Fold 8, and Z Fold 8 Ultra.

    Does the case from Galaxy S25 FE fit the S26 FE?

    No. The new model is 0.3 mm taller and wider, and the camera island has been slightly redesigned. The cutouts for the camera and buttons do not align in the same place, so you need a case dedicated to the specific model.

    Does the Galaxy S26 FE have magnets for MagSafe?

    No, just like the S25 FE. Both phones charge wirelessly using the Qi2 standard at 15 W, but they do not have a built-in ring of magnets. The magnets are added by the case, such as the Spigen Ultra Hybrid Mag or UAG Scout MagSafe.

    Which phone has a longer battery life?

    The Galaxy S26 FE, but the difference is small. The capacity is identical (4,900 mAh), and the gain comes from the more efficient 3 nm processor. Samsung claims about an hour longer video playback.

  • What is the best charger for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra?

    What is the best charger for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra?

    The best charger for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is the Tech-Protect PowerVision NC45W-GaN. It has a profile of 15 V / 3 A, supports PPS, and features a display where you can check the actual charging power. A safe choice is the original Samsung charger EP-T4511 45 W. For both, purchase a USB-C 5 A cable, as without it, the phone won’t reach 45 W.

    The Z Fold 8 Ultra has a 5,000 mAh battery and supports 45 W wired charging and 20 W wireless charging. It sounds simple, but the charger market is full of 65 W and 100 W bricks that throttle down to 25 W in Samsung devices.

    Below you will find three parameters that must be on the box, a fourth condition often overlooked by manufacturers, and a ranking of 7 chargers with an output profile table.

    Three parameters that must be on the box

    When buying a charger for the Z Fold 8 Ultra, look for three things at once. The absence of even one will revert the phone to a slower mode.

    Power: 45 W or more. A more powerful charger won’t hurt. The phone draws exactly what it needs, and a 65 W or 100 W brick operates cooler than a 45 W brick pushed to its limits. If you’re looking for the smallest high-power designs, check out our ranking of GaN chargers.

    PPS: a necessary condition. Programmable Power Supply allows for smooth regulation of voltage and current instead of jumping between fixed thresholds. Without PPS, a 45 W charger throttles down to 15–25 W in Samsung devices, as the phone cannot activate Super Fast Charging 2.0 mode.

    PD 3.0: base protocol. USB Power Delivery 3.0 is the standard under which PPS operates at all. A charger with just Quick Charge, without PD, will not communicate with Samsung at full speed.

    Note: “45 W” on the casing is the maximum power of the charger, not a guarantee of 45 W for the phone. The output profile matters. Look for the specification stating 15 V / 3 A: that’s what provides 45 W.

    The fourth condition that charger manufacturers are silent about

    You can have the perfect charger and still charge your phone slowly. The reason lies in the cable.

    Charging at 45 W requires a USB-C to USB-C cable with a 5 A load capacity and an e-marker. An e-marker is an integrated circuit in the cable that informs devices what current the cable can safely carry. The USB Type-C specification requires it in every cable above 3 A.

    A cable without an e-marker reports a limit of 3 A. The phone sees this limit and automatically switches to a slower mode, even if the charger offers more. A regular USB-A cable also excludes Super Fast Charging 2.0.

    Samsung sells its set directly under the name “45W PD Power Adapter with 5A USB-C Cable.” This is not a marketing addition, but part of the specification.

    This explains the most common complaint from users of foldable phones: “I bought a more powerful charger, and the phone charges slower than before.” Usually, the culprit is the cable included in the package.

    How long does the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra actually take to charge

    ParameterValue
    Battery capacity5,000 mAh
    Wired charging45 W (Super Fast Charging 2.0)
    Wireless charging20 W, Qi2 standard
    Magnets in the case❌ phone is “Qi2 Ready”
    ConnectorUSB-C
    Required cable for 45 WUSB-C / USB-C, 5 A, e-marker

    The battery has increased from 4,400 mAh in the previous generation to 5,000 mAh thanks to silicon-carbon cells. With the larger cell, the difference between charging at 25 W and 45 W becomes noticeable: it’s a matter of several dozen minutes for a full cycle.

    Note: The Z Fold 8 Ultra does not have magnets in the case. It supports Qi2, but the magnetic ring must be provided by the case. A magnetic wireless charger will not stick to the bare phone.

    Ranking: 7 best chargers for Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra

    1. Tech-Protect PowerVision NC45W-GaN: the only one with a power display

    Our choice: a complete set of parameters plus a display that confirms the actual power.

    This is a charger that shows how many watts are actually flowing to the phone. The PowerView AI 2.0 display provides the current power consumption and temperature. If there is an issue with charging speed, you can immediately see whether the charger or the cable is to blame.

    Under the hood, it has a complete set of required parameters: a profile of 15 V / 3 A, PPS in the range of 5–11 V at 4.5 A, and the PD 3.2 protocol, which is newer than the required PD 3.0.

    • Profile 15 V / 3 A provides a full 45 W for Samsung
    • PPS 5–11 V / 4.5 A and PD 3.2, QC4+, AVS, UFCS, AFC
    • PowerView AI 2.0 display shows power in watts and temperature
    • GaN technology in a case of 78.5 × 32 × 41 mm
    • Thermal and overvoltage protections

    Cons: one USB-C port. If you are charging a phone and a laptop at the same time, check the multi-port options below. No cable included.

    ParameterValue
    Maximum power45 W
    Ports1 × USB-C
    Profile 15 V / 3 A
    PPS✅ 5–11 V / 4.5 A
    ProtocolsPD 3.2, QC4+, AVS, UFCS, AFC

    2. Samsung EP-T4511 45W: original without surprises

    If you don’t want to analyze the specifications, take the manufacturer’s charger. EP-T4511 is Samsung’s reference 45 W brick and the standard against which others are compared.

    The specification lists PDO profiles of 9 V, 15 V, and 20 V, with a current of 3 A at 9 V and 15 V, and PPS in the range of 5–20 V. The standby power consumption is below 5 mW, so the brick can remain in the socket.

    • 15 V / 3 A profile confirmed in the manufacturer’s specification
    • PPS 5–20 V and full compatibility with Super Fast Charging 2.0
    • Standby consumption below 5 mW
    • Protections against overload, short circuit, and overheating

    Two downsides. Cable sold separately. And this is not a trivial matter, because without a 5 A cable, the charger will not show its full capabilities. It is also the largest design among the 45 W models: 43.5 × 81.8 × 28 mm, without GaN technology.

    ParameterValue
    Maximum power45 W
    Ports1 × USB-C
    Profile 15 V / 3 A
    PPS✅ 5–20 V
    Cable included

    3. UGREEN Nexode Pro 45W: two ports in a package-sized cube

    The best compromise between size and capabilities. The GaNInfinity chip allowed to fit 45 W and two USB-C ports into a 35.89 × 36.5 × 47 mm housing, 21% smaller than traditional designs.

    The list of supported standards is the longest in the ranking and includes the most important: PD 3.0 with PPS, along with QC4+, SCP, FCP, and AFC. The manufacturer states that the MacBook Air M2 charges up to 72% in one hour.

    • PD 3.0 with PPS plus QC4+, QC3.0, SCP, FCP, AFC
    • Two USB-C ports: phone and headphones simultaneously
    • GaNInfinity provides a 21% smaller casing
    • Thermal Guard monitors temperature in real-time

    To be fair: the manufacturer does not publish exact voltage profiles in the store specification, so we cannot confirm the 15 V / 3 A profile in black and white. However, the presence of PPS in PD 3.0 is sufficient confirmation. This is the most frequently purchased 45 W charger in the ranking.

    ParameterValue
    Maximum power45 W
    Ports2 × USB-C
    15 V / 3 A profilenot specified
    PPS
    TechnologyGaNInfinity

    [hs_products ids=”142548,102989,76149″ cols=”3″ title=”Three highest-rated chargers from the ranking”]

    4. USAMS CC305 T66 45W GaN: full 45 W on the main port

    USAMS, as one of the few manufacturers, provides a full output profile table in the store. This works to its advantage. The USB-C1 port delivers 5 V / 3 A, 9 V / 3 A, 12 V / 3 A, 15 V / 3 A, and 20 V / 2.25 A.

    The second port is noticeably weaker (15 V at 2 A), and when both are used simultaneously, the power is divided into 25 W and 18 W. It’s important: connect the phone to port C1 if you want full speed.

    • Profile 15 V / 3 A on the USB-C1 port, confirmed in the manufacturer’s table
    • Two USB-C ports with power split of 25 W + 18 W
    • GaN technology, housing made of ABS and polycarbonate (PC)
    • Weight approximately 96 g, dimensions 39 × 33.5 × 44.5 mm

    What is missing: the specification does not explicitly mention PPS. However, the 15 V / 3 A profile is clearly stated, and it is responsible for 45 W.

    ParameterValue
    Maximum power45 W
    Ports2 × USB-C (25 W + 18 W combined)
    Profile 15 V / 3 A✅ port C1
    PPSnot specified
    Weightapprox. 96 g

    5. Bizon Charger VT-36B 45W: the only one with Super Fast Charging 2.0 in the specification

    The most complete specification outside the first league of brands. Bizon is the only one that mentions Super Fast Charging 2.0 by name in the specification, which is exactly the mode that matters for Samsung.

    Moreover, the 15 V / 3 A profile is available on both USB-C ports, not just the main one. GaN3 technology keeps the temperature low, and the manufacturer claims it can charge up to 50% in 30 minutes.

    • Super Fast Charging 2.0 mentioned directly in the specification
    • Profile 15 V / 3 A on both USB-C ports
    • GaN3 lowers operating temperature
    • CE and RoHS certifications, dimensions 9 × 3.5 cm

    Limitation: with two devices at once, 45 W is divided between the ports, so the phone will not receive full power. Bizon is the least recognizable brand in the comparison, but here the specification speaks for itself.

    ParameterValue
    Maximum power45 W
    Ports2 × USB-C
    Profile 15 V / 3 A✅ both ports
    Super Fast Charging 2.0✅ declared
    TechnologyGaN3

    6. Spigen EE451EU Essential 45W: charger and cable in one box

    This is the only item in the ranking with a cable included. Considering that the cable determines the achievement of 45 W, the set in one box has real value.

    The design is maximally simple: one USB-C port, 45 W power, Power Delivery support, cable length of 1 m.

    • 1 m USB-C cable included
    • 45 W power on one USB-C port
    • Power Delivery standard
    • Compact design without unnecessary features

    To be fair: Spigen does not publish voltage profiles, PPS support, or the load capacity of the included cable in the product sheet. If you care about confirmed 45 W, choose an item with full specifications, and purchase the cable separately.

    ParameterValue
    Maximum power45 W
    Ports1 × USB-C
    Profile 15 V / 3 Anot specified
    PPSnot specified
    Cable included✅ 1 m

    7. Satechi ChargeView GaN 140W: one cube for the entire desk

    A proposal for someone who wants to use one charger for a laptop, tablet, headphones, and Z Fold 8 Ultra. Four USB-C ports and 140 W are enough to charge the phone at full power even when the other ports are in use.

    The display shows the charging status, and GaN technology keeps reasonable dimensions for this power. An alternative to a multi-port cube are 2-in-1 and 3-in-1 charging stations.

    • 140 W total power
    • Four USB-C ports: phone, laptop, tablet, and headphones at the same time
    • Built-in display for charging status
    • GaN Technology in a compact housing

    Honestly: this is overkill for the phone itself, and the product card does not mention PPS or power distribution to the ports. You buy it for the number of ports and power reserve, not because it is the best charger for the phone itself.

    ParameterValue
    Maximum power140 W
    Ports4 × USB-C
    Profile 15 V / 3 Anot specified
    PPSnot specified
    Display✅ charging status

    [hs_products ids=”108818,127267,132892,138104″ cols=”4″ title=”Items 4–7 from the ranking”]

    Comparison of 45 W chargers for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra

    ChargerPowerPortsProfile 15 V / 3 APPSHighlight
    Tech-Protect PowerVision NC45W45 W1 × USB-CPower and temperature display
    Samsung EP-T451145 W1 × USB-COriginal phone manufacturer
    UGREEN Nexode Pro45 W2 × USB-Cnot specifiedSmallest with two ports
    USAMS CC305 T6645 W2 × USB-C✅ port C1not specifiedFull output profile table
    Bizon Charger VT-36B45 W2 × USB-C✅ both portsnot specifiedClaims Super Fast Charging 2.0
    Spigen EE451EU Essential45 W1 × USB-Cnot specifiednot specifiedCable included
    Satechi ChargeView140 W4 × USB-Cnot specifiednot specifiedFour ports and display

    “Not specified” means that the manufacturer does not publish this parameter on the product sheet. This is not a criticism of the equipment, but information about what cannot be verified before purchase.

    Which charger to choose? Recommendations based on needs

    Want to be sure you’re getting 45 W → Tech-Protect PowerVision NC45W-GaN. The display shows real power, so you don’t have to guess anything.

    Don’t want to analyze specifications → Samsung EP-T4511. The charger from the phone manufacturer, fully compliant with the standard. Remember the cable.

    Charging your phone and a second device → UGREEN Nexode Pro 45W. Two USB-C ports in a case smaller than the original Samsung.

    Want 45 W on both ports at the same time → Bizon Charger VT-36B. 15 V / 3 A profile on each output and Super Fast Charging 2.0 mentioned in the specifications.

    Buying your first charger and don’t have a cable → Spigen EE451EU Essential. A complete set in one box.

    You have a laptop, tablet, and phone on your desk → Satechi ChargeView GaN 140W. Four ports and power reserve.

    Cable: the element where it’s easiest to lose 45 W

    Let’s repeat, because this is the most common mistake. To charge 45 W you need a USB-C to USB-C cable with a 5 A load capacity and an e-marker. A cable from the previous phone’s set, a USB-A cable, and a cheap unmarked wire will keep the phone in a slower mode.

    What to look for in the cable description:

    • 5 A or 100 W is the same information expressed differently
    • E-marker, sometimes described as “E-Mark chip”
    • USB-C on both ends: adapters and USB-A are not acceptable
    • Length matched to the charging location, because a longer cable means greater losses

    More about choosing the cable can be found in the guide which fast charging cable to choose.

    [hs_products ids=”120612,120615,137656″ cols=”3″ title=”USB-C 5 A cables for 45 W charging”]

    You will find the full selection in the category USB-C to USB-C cables.

    Wireless charger for Samsung: what Qi2 offers in the Z Fold 8 Ultra

    The Z Fold 8 Ultra charges wirelessly with a power of 20 W in the Qi2 standard. A wireless charger is a convenient solution for the desk, but it is always slower than wired charging.

    Important note: the phone does not have magnets in the case. A magnetic Qi2 charger will not stick to the bare phone until you put on a case with a magnetic ring. A regular flat wireless charger will work without any additional accessories.

    When choosing a wireless charger for Samsung, check the declared power for Android phones. Some magnetic chargers state the highest power only for iPhones, while offering significantly less for other devices.

    Below you will find both variants: flat pads that work with a bare phone, and magnetic Qi2 models to pair with a case with a ring.

    [hs_products category=”245″ limit=”6″ sort=”sales” title=”Wireless and magnetic Qi2 chargers”]

    Charging in the Car and on the Go

    In the car, the same three parameters apply as at home. Look for a 45 W charger with PD and PPS, not a block described only by the amperage. Check car chargers and power banks if you are charging your phone on the go.

    If you are looking for accessories for a specific model, we have separate categories for Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Galaxy Z Fold 8.

    Summary

    The best charger for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is the Tech-Protect PowerVision NC45W-GaN. It has a confirmed profile of 15 V / 3 A, PPS, and a display that shows real power. The safest choice without analyzing specifications is the original Samsung charger EP-T4511, and the most confirmed parameters outside of the original are provided by the Bizon Charger VT-36B.

    Three things to remember:

    1. Three parameters on the box: power of 45 W or more, PPS, and PD 3.0. Lack of PPS takes away over half the speed.
    2. 5 A cable with e-marker is just as important as the charger. Without it, the phone will not reach 45 W.
    3. A stronger charger does not harm. A 65 W or 100 W charger will provide exactly what the phone requests.

    FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions about the Z Fold 8 Ultra Charger

    Does it have to be an original charger for Samsung?

    No. Any charger with a minimum power of 45 W, supporting PPS and PD 3.0 standard is sufficient. The original Samsung charger ensures compatibility without checking specifications, but chargers from other brands with these parameters work identically.

    What is the difference between a 25 W charger and a 45 W charger?

    The 45 W charger activates Super Fast Charging 2.0 mode in the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, which is a profile of 15 V / 3 A. The 25 W charger is limited to the first generation of Super Fast Charging. With a 5,000 mAh battery, the difference in full cycle time is several dozen minutes.

    Can a 65 W charger be used to charge the phone?

    Yes. It is completely safe. The phone negotiates the power it needs with the charger and will draw a maximum of 45 W. A stronger charger operates cooler because it does not work at the edge of its capabilities.

    How many watts must a charger for Samsung have?

    To the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra minimum of 45 W with PPS support. A 25 W charger will charge the phone, but clearly slower. Power alone is not enough: a 65 W block without PPS will slow down to 15–25 W.

    Why does my new charger charge slower than my old one?

    The most common reason is the cable. 45 W charging requires a USB-C to USB-C cable with a 5 A load capacity and an e-marker. Another reason may be the lack of PPS support in the new charger, despite the high power indicated on the casing.

    Does the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra support wireless charging?

    Yes, with a power of up to 20 W in the Qi2 standard. However, the phone does not have magnets in the casing, so a magnetic Qi2 charger requires a case with a magnetic ring. A regular flat induction charger works without any additions.

    What is the purpose of a power display on a charger?

    It allows you to verify the actual charging speed. The display shows the power consumption in watts, so you can immediately see whether the phone is receiving 45 W or has dropped to a slower mode due to the cable or lack of PPS.


    Sources: Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra specifications on GSMArena, 45W PD Power Adapter with 5A USB-C Cable set on Samsung.com, USB Type-C specification, e-marker requirement above 3 A — USB-IF

  • The best cases for Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8: ranking of 10 models

    The best cases for Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8: ranking of 10 models

    The best case for the Galaxy Z Flip 8 is the Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro MagSafe. As the only one in the ranking, it combines integrated hinge protection with a built-in magnetic ring. For maximum protection, reach for the Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro with hinge cover and port plugs. The cheapest reasonable choice is the Tech-Protect FlexAir Hybrid MagSafe.

    The Z Flip 8 is the thinnest and lightest Flip in history: 6.1 mm thick and 180 g. The manufacturer achieved this at the cost of a margin for error. The Armor Aluminum frame and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 will withstand scratches, but the hinge and the plastic top of the main screen are defenseless.

    In this ranking, you will find 10 cases from 10 different brands, from rugged to designer, priced from 35 to 309 PLN. Each is described in terms of what really needs protection in a foldable: the hinge, the edges of the screen, and the glass back. At the end, there is a comparison table and answers to the questions that Flip users ask most often.

    Why a case for a foldable is a completely different category

    For a regular smartphone, you mainly buy a case to avoid cracking the screen. In a foldable, the main screen is folded inwards for most of the day, so the biggest risk shifts elsewhere.

    The hinge is the most expensive component of the construction. Samsung used the Armor FlexHinge mechanism with an expanded internal frame in the Z Flip 8. A grain of sand that gets into the gap can scratch the screen from the inside at the first fold.

    Resistance is IP48, not IP68. The number 4 means protection only against foreign bodies with a diameter greater than 1 mm. The standard does not cover dust, sand, or debris from pockets. A case with port covers and a hinge shield realistically reduces this gap.

    The main screen has a plastic top. You cannot apply tempered glass to it, and the factory film is part of the display’s construction and cannot be removed independently. You can scratch it with a nail.

    Note: replacing the display in the foldable Samsung costs around 1,500–2,000 PLN at an authorized service center, which is several times the price of the most expensive case in this comparison. You can check the current price list at the Samsung Poland service.

    Qi2 Ready: magnets are in the case, not in the phone

    This is the most often overlooked fact about the Z Flip 8. The phone supports wireless charging 15 W in the Qi2 standard, but there are no magnets in the housing. Samsung describes it as “Qi2 Ready.”

    In practice, this means one thing: the magnetic ring must be provided by the case. Without it, the phone will not stick to a magnetic charger, car mount, or power bank. Inductive charging will work, but without automatic alignment of the coils.

    When choosing a case for the Z Flip 8, you are actually deciding whether your phone will be magnetic. This is a much more serious decision than the color of the case. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 case with a magnetic ring is something you buy once, along with the entire rest of the ecosystem.

    The case with magnets unlocks:

    Manufacturers call it differently: Spigen uses the designation MagFit, UNIQ talks about MagClick, most brands simply write MagSafe. It’s the same arrangement of magnets and the same accessories.

    What to pay attention to when choosing a case for the Z Flip 8

    Criterion Why it’s important for the foldable
    Hinge protection A separate cover or integrated design protects the most expensive part of the phone
    Magnetic ring The phone doesn’t have its own magnets; without a case, you lose Qi2 accessories
    Raised edges Protect the FlexWindow and camera island when placing the phone screen down
    Thickness The folded Flip 8 is 13.1 mm thick, and the case adds to both halves; rugged models take away Flip’s main advantage
    Button and port covers Realistically complement the limited IP48 standard
    Two-piece design The Flip case consists of two separate parts that cannot block folding

    Tip: the case from Galaxy Z Flip 7 does not fit Z Flip 8. The dimensions of the housing and the layout of the camera island have changed. Check if the product is labeled as “Flip 8″ or “Flip8″ before ordering.

    Ranking: Top 10 cases for Galaxy Z Flip 8

    1. Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro MagSafe: transparent with hinge protection

    Our choice: magnets and hinge protection in one case.

    Spigen has combined two things here that rarely go hand in hand: integrated hinge construction and a built-in magnetic ring. The design supports the natural bending of the phone instead of hindering it.

    The material is a classic hybrid: flexible TPU absorbs shocks, while the hard polycarbonate panel resists scratches. The transparent finish allows the original color of the Flip to show through.

    • Integrated hinge protection covering the entire folding mechanism
    • MagFit ring provides full compatibility with magnetic accessories without removing the case
    • Precise cutouts for all ports and buttons
    • Transparent back that does not obscure the color of the casing

    Cons? It’s one of the more expensive cases in the comparison, and the transparent polycarbonate yellows over time. This is material physics, not a flaw of a specific product.

    Parameter Value
    Material TPU + polycarbonate (PC)
    Magnets ✅ MagFit
    Hinge protection ✅ integrated
    Type Transparent, hybrid
    Price 185 PLN

    2. Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro: maximum protection without compromise

    This is the most complete protection in the entire ranking. The three-part construction covers the phone from all sides, and the dedicated hinge cover protects the folding mechanism as a separate element.

    Supcase addresses exactly those weak points we mentioned above. Port covers and button shields block dust and moisture where the IP48 standard stops working. The front frame with an integrated screen protector keeps the display away from flat surfaces.

    • Military certification for drop resistance (manufacturer’s declaration, no specified standard)
    • Hinge cover as a dedicated structural element
    • Port covers and button shields protect against dust and moisture
    • Hidden stand in vertical and horizontal mode
    • Rotating belt clip included

    The price of this protection is thickness and weight. If you bought the Flip because it fits in a small pocket, this is not the case for you. There are also no magnets, so Qi2 accessories are out of the question.

    Parameter Value
    Material TPU + polycarbonate (PC)
    Magnets
    Hinge protection ✅ dedicated cover
    Accessories Stand, rotating belt clip
    Price 195 PLN

    3. Tech-Protect FlexAir Hybrid MagSafe: the cheapest way to Qi2 magnets

    Best value for money: magnetic ring without paying extra for the brand.

    If you only care about making your phone magnetic, this is the cheapest way to achieve that. The FlexAir Hybrid costs several times less than Spigen, and the built-in magnetic ring works with the same chargers and mounts.

    The construction is proven: flexible TPU sides, hard polycarbonate back, raised edges around the FlexWindow and camera island. The dual-layer structure disperses impact energy.

    • Built-in magnetic ring compatible with MagSafe and Qi2 accessories
    • Hybrid construction TPU + PC
    • Raised edges around the screen and camera
    • Transparent design showcases the original design

    What you don’t get: hinge cover, port plugs, and certifications. This is a daily case, not a rugged one.

    Parameter Value
    Material TPU + polycarbonate (PC)
    Magnets
    Hinge protection
    Type Transparent, hybrid
    Price 39 PLN

    [hs_products ids=”141407,140336,140958″ cols=”3″ title=”Three highest-rated cases from the ranking”]

    4. PITAKA Edge Case: the thinnest, made of aramid fiber

    You bought the thinnest Flip in history and don’t want to bulk it up? The Edge Case has thickness from 0.88 to 1.84 mm depending on the spot. It is the thinnest case in this comparison, practically unnoticeable in hand.

    The material is aramid fiber in proprietary Fusion Weaving technology. It’s the same raw material used in aviation. Aramid is exceptionally resistant to abrasion, does not discolor, and retains its texture. The characteristic weave is an element of design here, not just construction.

    • Thickness 0.88–1.84 mm is the thinnest construction in the ranking
    • Aramid fiber resistant to abrasion and scratches
    • Full compatibility with MagSafe and wireless charging
    • Raised edges around the lenses
    • Textured surface improves grip

    To be honest: this is the most expensive case in the comparison, several times more expensive than budget options in the ranking. You pay for the material and slimness, not for drop resistance. Aramid protects against scratches but does not absorb impacts like thick TPU.

    Parameter Value
    Material Aramid fiber (Fusion Weaving)
    Thickness 0.88–1.84 mm
    Magnets
    Hinge protection
    Price 309 PLN

    5. UNIQ Veren AF MagClick Charging: matte, fingerprint-free

    Every transparent case looks like evidence after two weeks. The Veren AF solves this with a frosted finish Anti-Fingerprint that does not collect greasy stains or fingerprints.

    Under the matte surface is a solid hybrid of TPU and polycarbonate with reinforced corners. The manufacturer claims effective protection from drops from a height of up to 2.5 meters. This is the highest declared result in this comparison.

    • Matte AF finish that does not collect fingerprints
    • Drop tests up to 2.5 m according to the manufacturer’s declaration
    • Reinforced corners in hybrid construction
    • MagClick are built-in magnets compatible with MagSafe accessories
    • Ergonomic grooves on the side edges

    The semi-transparent smoky frost is a compromise between a transparent case and a solid one. If you want to fully cover the phone, take the black or white version.

    Parameter Value
    Material TPU + polycarbonate (PC)
    Magnets ✅ MagClick
    Drop resistance up to 2.5 m (manufacturer’s declaration)
    Finish Matte, anti-fingerprint
    Price 119 PLN

    6. Samsung Flipsuit: official, with interchangeable NFC cards

    The only case in this ranking that talks to the phone. Flipsuit uses interchangeable cards with NFC technology: you slide the card into the back, and the Z Flip 8 recognizes it and changes the graphic on the FlexWindow along with animations.

    This is Samsung’s official solution, so the fit and cutouts are indisputable. The protection is adequate, though not armored: scratch and impact protection, free access to ports.

    • NFC Flipsuit Cards change the appearance of the external screen
    • Original Samsung accessory with guaranteed fit
    • Scratch and impact protection
    • Sleek, minimalist design

    Note two things: the cards are purchased separately, and the case does not have a magnetic ring. If you want an official case with magnets, look for the Clear Magnet or Silicone Ring Magnet variants.

    Parameter Value
    Manufacturer Samsung (original)
    Magnets
    Customization ✅ NFC Flipsuit cards
    Hinge protection
    Price 219 PLN

    [hs_products ids=”142022,142134,141226″ cols=”3″ title=”Slim, matte, and official: items 4-6″]

    7. Guess Magnetic Ring Stand Grained Classic Logo: fashion with a stand

    A case from a fashion brand that surprises with its functionality. Besides the recognizable 4G pattern and gold logo, you get a foldable stand and a full-fledged magnetic ring.

    The construction is a layer of polycarbonate covered with textured eco-leather, mounted on a TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) base. The eco-leather is scratch-resistant, so the case does not age as quickly as transparent plastic.

    • Foldable stand for movies and video calls
    • Magnetic ring compatible with MagSafe chargers
    • Eco-leather on polycarbonate is a durable finish
    • 4G pattern with gold Guess logo

    This is a choice for someone who treats the case as part of their styling. The protection is adequate, but without certifications and without hinge protection.

    Parameter Value
    Material Eco-leather / TPU / PC
    Magnets
    Stand ✅ foldable
    Type Hardcase, fashion
    Price 169 PLN

    8. Tech-Protect Wallet: with a flap and card pockets

    Bestseller in this category: the most frequently purchased flap case for Z Flip 8.

    The only flap case in the ranking and at the same time the highest-rated flap case in our offer. It solves the age-old dilemma of Flip owners: can you have a foldable phone and a wallet in one.

    The eco-leather flap closes with a magnet and covers the FlexWindow, so the external screen is protected even when the phone is lying screen up. The internal pockets hold cards and cash, and the flap unfolds into a stand.

    • Magnetic closure of the flap
    • Pockets for cards and cash
    • Stand function in landscape mode
    • TPU base protecting against drops
    • Eco-leather with reinforcing stitching

    The compromise is obvious: the wallet case does not have a magnetic ring and noticeably thickens the phone. Keep payment cards away from the NFC module.

    Parameter Value
    Material Eco-leather + TPU
    Type Flap wallet
    Magnets
    Stand
    Price 39 PLN

    9. Bizon Case Tur: the cheapest in the ranking, available in six colors

    The cheapest option in the ranking and the only one available in six color variants: black, navy blue, burgundy, red, light blue, and light gray. A good choice if you want to have several cases to change instead of one expensive one.

    The design is simple: hard plastic with integrated button covers and slightly raised edges. Wireless charging works without removing the case.

    • Six colors to choose from
    • Integrated button covers
    • Raised edges around the screen
    • Compatible with wireless charging

    No magnets and no hinge cover. Hard plastic protects against scratches better than falls; TPU absorbs impact more effectively. The manufacturer also states a limitation: the case works with screen protectors for the main screen not exceeding 166.3 × 74.1 mm.

    Parameter Value
    Material Hard plastic
    Magnets
    Colors 6 variants
    Wireless charging
    Price 35 PLN

    10. Karl Lagerfeld Karl&Choupette Pins MagSafe: designer with a pin

    The most recognizable item in the lineup. The eco-leather case features a pin depicting Karl Lagerfeld with his cat Choupette. This is a detail you won’t find with any tech brand.

    Underneath the design is a solid hardcase construction made of eco-leather on polycarbonate and TPU. Raised edges protect the FlexWindow and lens, button covers and cutouts for ports are in place.

    • Karl & Choupette pin as a design element
    • Magnetic ring compatible with MagSafe accessories
    • Eco-leather pleasant to the touch
    • Raised edges around the screen and camera

    You primarily buy the appearance and brand license here. The level of protection is comparable to Guess: good for everyday use, without bulletproof ambitions.

    Parameter Value
    Material Eco-leather / TPU / PC
    Magnets
    Type Hardcase, designer
    Hinge protection
    Price 169 PLN

    [hs_products ids=”142012,141318,141279,142015″ cols=”4″ title=”Fashionable, wallet-friendly, and budget: positions 7-10″]

    Comparison of cases for Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8: summary table

    Case Magnets Hinge Protection Highlight Price
    Bizon Case Tur Six colors, the cheapest 35 PLN
    Tech-Protect FlexAir Hybrid The cheapest way to magnets 39 PLN
    Tech-Protect Wallet Flap and card pockets 39 PLN
    UNIQ Veren AF Matte, drops up to 2.5 m 119 PLN
    Guess Magnetic Ring Stand Folding stand 169 PLN
    Karl Lagerfeld Pins Karl & Choupette pin 169 PLN
    Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro The only one with magnets and hinge at the same time 185 PLN
    Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro Port covers, stand, clip 195 PLN
    Samsung Flipsuit NFC cards change FlexWindow 219 PLN
    PITAKA Edge Case Aramid, 0.88–1.84 mm 309 PLN

    Prices valid as of publication date (19.08.2026). The current amount and availability are always shown by the product tile and the product card in the store.

    Which case to choose for the Z Flip 8? Recommendations based on needs

    Are you looking for one case for everything → Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro MagSafe. Magnets and hinge protection in one product, without choosing the lesser evil.

    The phone is going with you to the construction site and in the mountains or ends up in a child’s hands → Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro. Port covers and hinge protection are the only real answer to the IP48 standard.

    You already have a magnetic charger and just want to connect it → Tech-Protect FlexAir Hybrid MagSafe. Several times cheaper than Spigen, and the magnets hold just as well.

    You bought the Flip for its slimness → PITAKA Edge Case. Below 2 mm at its thickest point. Aramid instead of plastic.

    You hate fingerprints on the case → UNIQ Veren AF. Matte surface and the highest declared drop resistance in the comparison.

    You want to carry cards without a wallet → Tech-Protect Wallet. The flap protects the FlexWindow, and the pockets hold documents.

    Are you looking for a gift → Karl Lagerfeld or Guess. Recognizable brand, eco-leather, and magnets included.

    What to complement the case for the Galaxy Z Flip 8

    The case takes care of the back and edges. There are still three areas in the foldable that no one else will take care of.

    FlexWindow. The external screen is not foldable, so you can put regular tempered glass on it. This is the screen that gets damaged most often because you use it with the phone folded.

    Main screen. Here, only hydrogel or protective film works. Never tempered glass: it will crack on the first fold and may damage the display.

    Camera lenses. The camera island protrudes above the casing. Separate lenses or metal frames cost a fraction of the price of repairing the module.

    [hs_products ids=”141392,141236,141083,141127″ cols=”4″ title=”Screen and camera protection for Z Flip 8″]

    If you are looking for accessories for an older model, we have separate categories for Galaxy Z Flip 7 and all generations of Galaxy Z Flip. Owners of the larger foldable will find a complete set in the Galaxy Z Fold 8 category.

    Summary

    The best case for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 is the Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro MagSafe. It is the only case in the comparison that combines integrated hinge protection with a magnetic ring. For maximum protection, reach for the Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro, and for the cheapest entry into magnetic accessories, go for the Tech-Protect FlexAir Hybrid MagSafe.

    Three things to keep in mind when choosing:

    1. The Z Flip 8 does not have its own magnets. The case determines whether the phone will work with Qi2 chargers and mounts.
    2. The hinge and IP48 rating are the real weak points, not the back panel. The hinge cover and port plugs are more important than the thickness of the back.
    3. The case from the Flip 7 does not fit the Flip 8. Check the model designation before purchasing.

    All described cases, glasses, and films can be found in one place.

    FAQ: frequently asked questions about the Z Flip 8 case

    Does the case from the Galaxy Z Flip 7 fit the Z Flip 8?

    No. The Z Flip 8 has different housing dimensions and a changed camera island layout, so the case from the previous generation will not provide a proper fit. Only purchase products marked as “Flip 8″ or “Flip8″.

    Does the Galaxy Z Flip 8 have magnets like MagSafe?

    No, it does not. The phone is “Qi2 Ready,” meaning it supports 15W wireless charging in the Qi2 standard, but the case must provide the magnets. Without a case with a magnetic ring, magnetic accessories will not stick to the housing.

    Case with a flap or without for a foldable phone?

    Without a flap, if you care about slimness and magnets. The folded Flip protects the main screen by itself. With a flap, if you want to cover the FlexWindow and carry payment cards instead of a wallet. The flap case does not have a magnetic ring.

    Can tempered glass be applied to the main screen of the Galaxy Z Flip 8?

    No. The main screen has a flexible plastic surface, and the tempered glass will crack on the first fold. Only use hydrogel or protective films. Apply tempered glass only to the external FlexWindow.

    How much does it cost to replace the screen on the Galaxy Z Flip 8?

    Replacing the display in the foldable Samsung costs around 1,500–2,000 PLN at an authorized service center, which is several times the price of the most expensive case in this ranking. You can find the current price list on the Samsung Poland service page.

    Does the Galaxy Z Flip 8 come with a factory film on the main screen?

    Yes. The film is part of the foldable display’s construction and cannot be removed by yourself: peeling it off reveals a layer that scratches with a fingernail. The replacement should be done by an authorized service. This case does not protect the film, as the main screen is folded inward.

    Is it worth buying a case with hinge protection?

    Yes, if you often carry your phone in your pocket with keys or work in a dusty environment. The IP48 standard only protects against particles larger than 1 mm, so fine sand can get into the mechanism. The hinge cover is available on the Spigen Ultra Hybrid Pro and Supcase Unicorn Beetle Pro.


    Sources: Galaxy Z Flip8 specification on GSMArena, official Galaxy Z Flip8 page on Samsung.pl, Galaxy Z Flip 8 and Qi2 standard on SamMobile

  • Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — comparison

    Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — comparison

    Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are two top foldable smartphones in a book style. Which one to choose? We compare specifications, cameras, batteries, and prices.

    Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — this is the showdown that the entire foldable smartphone market has been waiting for in 2026. Motorola debuts in the book format with a 6000 mAh battery, a triple 50 MP camera (DXOMARK Gold certified), and a price starting from 9999 PLN (8499 PLN with cashback).

    Samsung responds with the proven One UI 8 ecosystem, a 200 MP camera, Galaxy AI, and a price starting at around 6450 PLN in stores (RRP 8799 PLN). Which of them will perform better as your daily smartphone? Below is a detailed comparison of specifications, cameras, batteries, and prices — with specific recommendations for different types of users.

    Specifications — comparison table

    Before we get into the details, here are the key parameters of both smartphones in one table:

    ParameterMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
    Internal screen8.09″ LTPO pOLED, 2K, 120 Hz, 6200 nits8.0″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2K, 120 Hz
    External screen6.6″ pOLED, 165 Hz, 6000 nits6.5″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120 Hz
    ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3 nm)Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (3 nm)
    RAM16 GB LPDDR5X12 GB / 16 GB (1 TB)
    Storage512 GB UFS 4.1256 / 512 GB / 1 TB
    Main camera50 MP Sony LYTIA 828, f/1.6, OIS200 MP, f/1.7, OIS
    Telephoto50 MP Sony LYTIA 600, 3x zoom10 MP, f/2.4, 3x zoom
    Ultra-wide50 MP, f/2.0, 122°12 MP, f/2.2, 123°
    Selfie (external screen)32 MP10 MP
    Selfie (internal screen)20 MP10 MP
    Video8K @ 30 fps Dolby Vision, 4K @ 120 fps8K @ 30 fps, 4K @ 60 fps
    Battery6000 mAh (Si/C)4400 mAh
    Wired charging80 W TurboPower45 W
    Wireless charging50 W + 5 W reverse15 W + 4.5 W reverse
    ResistanceIPX9IP48
    SystemAndroid 16 (7 years of updates)Android 16 + One UI 8 (7 years)
    StylusMoto Pen Ultra (included)S Pen (optional)
    Dimensions (folded)160.1 × 73.6 × 10.1 mm158.5 × 72.8 × 8.9 mm
    Weight243 g215 g
    Screen protectionGorilla Glass Ceramic 3Gorilla Glass Victus 2
    Price in Poland (RRP)9999 zł (16/512 GB)8799 zł (12/256 GB)
    Market price (April 2026)from ~8499 zł (with cashback)from ~6450 zł (Ceneo/Allegro)

    Razr Fold vs Z Fold 7 Screens — Brightness and Refresh Rate

    The Motorola Razr Fold offers slightly larger screens and significantly higher brightness. The internal display of 8.09 inches with a brightness of 6200 nits is one of the brightest panels in foldable smartphones — readable even in full sunlight. The external display of 6.6 inches with a refresh rate of 165 Hz is better suited for gaming and fast scrolling of content.

    The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has an internal display of 8.0 inches and an external display of 6.5 inches — both with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and Dynamic AMOLED 2X technology. Samsung does not provide peak brightness, but in practice, the panel is bright enough for everyday use.

    Screen Verdict: Motorola wins in brightness and size, while Samsung offers proven Dynamic AMOLED technology with deeper blacks and excellent color calibration. If you use your smartphone outdoors a lot — the Razr Fold will be the better choice.

    Camera — 50 MP vs 200 MP

    This is one of the most interesting differences. Samsung opts for one large 200 MP sensor with pixel binning, while Motorola uses three 50 MP cameras with top Sony LYTIA sensors.

    Motorola Razr Fold — triple 50 MP

    • 50 MP Sony LYTIA 828 (f/1.6, OIS) — large 1/1.28″ sensor with excellent low-light performance
    • 50 MP ultra-wide (f/2.0, 122°) — with macro mode from 3.5 cm
    • 50 MP Sony LYTIA 600 telephoto (3x zoom, OIS) — periscope, with AI Super Zoom Pro up to 100x
    • Certificate DXOMARK Gold 2026 — 164/175 points

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 200 MP with AI

    • 200 MP (f/1.7, OIS) — binning to 12.5 MP, excellent details in daylight
    • 12 MP ultra-wide (f/2.2, 123°)
    • 10 MP telephoto (f/2.4, 3x zoom, OIS)
    • Galaxy AI — advanced photo editing and generative tools

    In practice, the difference is most noticeable at zoom. Motorola with a 50 MP periscope telephoto retains a lot of detail at 3x and produces usable photos even at 10x. Samsung with a mere 10 MP telephoto quickly loses sharpness above 3x — details blur already at 5x.

    In low light, Motorola uses a large Sony LYTIA 828 sensor (1/1.28″) — one of the largest in foldable smartphones. Samsung compensates for the smaller sensor with advanced AI processing and multi-frame HDR, which yields good results but with fewer natural details.

    For video recording, Motorola offers 4K @ 120 fps and 8K with Dolby Vision — Samsung is limited to 4K @ 60 fps and 8K without Dolby Vision. For video creators, this is a significant advantage of the Razr Fold.

    Samsung, on the other hand, excels in daytime portraits thanks to its 200 MP sensor and better post-processing with Galaxy AI — automatic beautification, generative editing, and Circle to Search are features that Motorola does not offer at this level.

    Razr Fold Battery vs Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 6000 vs 4400 mAh

    This is the biggest difference between these smartphones and the main argument for Motorola.

    ParameterMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
    Capacity6000 mAh (Si/C)4400 mAh
    Difference36% less
    Wired charging80 W TurboPower45 W
    Wireless charging50 W15 W
    Reverse wireless5 W4.5 W
    Declared usage timeup to 59 h (mixed cycle)no official data

    Motorola Razr Fold with a 6000 mAh battery is the largest battery in the foldable smartphone segment. Compared to the Galaxy Z Fold 7 (4400 mAh), it offers 36% more capacity. Motorola claims up to 59 hours of usage in a mixed cycle — in practice, this means 1.5-2 days of typical use without charging.

    Charging with 80 W TurboPower allows you to recharge from 0 to 50% in about 15 minutes. Samsung, with 45 W charging, takes about 25-30 minutes for the same — that’s almost twice as long.

    Wireless charging at 50 W in Motorola is over three times faster than 15 W in Samsung. For those using wireless chargers, this is an important difference.

    Tip: For the Motorola Razr Fold, you need a wall charger supporting TurboPower 80 W (USB PD 3.0), while for Samsung, a 45 W charger with PD/PPS is sufficient. Check USB-C cables that support fast charging.

    Performance, system, and stylus

    Both smartphones use top Qualcomm processors in a 3 nm process, but they are slightly different chipsets with variations in clock speeds and performance.

    Motorola Razr FoldSnapdragon 8 Gen 5 with cores 2×3.8 GHz + 6×3.32 GHz and Adreno 829 GPU. 16 GB RAM and 512 GB UFS 4.1 in the only available variant. Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 achieves about 2300 points in Geekbench Single-Core and 9100 points in Multi-Core.

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy with cores 2×4.47 GHz + 6×3.53 GHz and Adreno 830 GPU. Higher clock speeds translate to approx. 3100 points in Geekbench Single-Core and 10,200 points in Multi-Core — 15-20% advantage in single-threaded tasks. In everyday use — scrolling through social media, switching apps, browsing websites — the difference is negligible. Both smartphones are extremely fast.

    Software

    In terms of software, Samsung has a clear advantage. One UI 8 is the most refined interface for foldable smartphones — with multitasking features (App Pair, Multi-window, floating windows), Galaxy AI (real-time translations, generative photo editing, conversation transcription, Circle to Search) and a rich ecosystem of accessories. If you have a Galaxy Watch or Galaxy Buds — the integration with Samsung is unmatched.

    Motorola offers a cleaner Android 16 with minimal overlay, but with fewer features dedicated to foldable screens. The Motorola interface is fast and free of bloatware, which will be appreciated by those who prefer a pure Android experience.

    Both models will receive 7 years of system updates — support until 2032 (Samsung) and 2033 (Motorola).

    S Pen

    The Motorola Razr Fold has a significant advantage: the Moto Pen Ultra is included in the package. It supports precise drawing, note-taking, and navigation through the interface on the large 8.09-inch screen.

    The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 supports the S Pen, but it must be purchased separately (around 200-350 PLN). The S Pen offers comparable functionality — note-taking, drawing, Air Gestures — but the additional cost must be added to the smartphone’s price.

    Design and Durability — Weight, Thickness, and Resistance

    The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is lighter (215 g vs 243 g) and thinner when folded (8.9 mm vs 10.1 mm). For people carrying a smartphone in their pants pocket, this is a significant difference — 28 g and over a millimeter less is a noticeable change in carrying comfort.

    Motorola stands out with a teardrop hinge made of stainless steel, which eliminates the visible gap when folded — the gap is still visible on Samsung’s device. When unfolded, Motorola has a thickness of 4.7 mm, while Samsung has 4.2 mm — here Samsung is slightly thinner.

    Available colors:
    Motorola: Pantone Blackened Blue, Pantone Lily White (+ FIFA edition with 24-karat gold)
    Samsung: Silver Gray, Navy Blue, Black

    In terms of durability, both smartphones have different priorities:
    Motorola: IPX9 (water jets under pressure + immersion up to 1.5 m for 30 min), Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3
    Samsung: IP48 (dust resistant above 1 mm + splash resistant), Gorilla Glass Victus 2

    Motorola offers better water resistance (IPX9 > IPX8 in Samsung), Samsung provides better dust protection (IP4X vs no dustproof certification in Motorola). If you often use your smartphone at the beach or in a workshop — each model has its own strengths here.

    Price of Razr Fold vs Z Fold 7 in Poland

    VariantMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
    12/256 GBRRP 8799 zł / market from ~6450 zł
    12/512 GBRRP 9999 zł / market from ~7200 zł
    16/512 GB9999 zł (cashback 1500 zł → 8499 zł)
    16/1 TBRRP 11 349 zł
    Limited editionFIFA World Cup 26™: 11 499 zł

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has been on the market since July 2025, so its market prices have significantly dropped. On Ceneo and Allegro, the 256 GB variant can be purchased for around 6450 zł — over 2000 zł cheaper than in the official Samsung store.

    Comparing the most similar configurations:

    • Motorola 16/512 GB (8499 zł with cashback) vs Samsung 12/512 GB (from ~7200 zł market) — Samsung is currently about 1300 zł cheaper, although it offers less RAM (12 vs 16 GB) and does not include a stylus
    • Samsung 12/256 GB (from ~6450 zł) is the cheapest entry point — over 2000 zł less than Motorola, making it significantly more affordable, although with less memory, a smaller battery, and no stylus

    Accessories — cases, films, and chargers

    Protecting your foldable smartphone is a priority — replacing the pOLED screen can cost several thousand zlotys. At homescreen.pl, you will find accessories for both models.

    For Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — available are cases and protective films for Galaxy Z Fold 7 from Samsung, 3MK, Ringke, UAG, PITAKA, and PanzerGlass. Prices range from 15.99 PLN (GrizzGlass film) to 379 PLN (Samsung Carbon Shield Case).

    For Motorola Razr Fold — the offer includes hydrogel films and lens protection from 3MK, Bizon Glass, and GrizzGlass. Due to the pOLED foldable screen, hydrogel films are recommended instead of traditional tempered glass.

    Complete protective set? Case + film for the inner screen + glass for the camera lens. Also check out power banks — they will be especially useful with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which has a smaller battery.

    Motorola Razr Fold or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — which one to choose?

    Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are the two best foldable smartphones in book style in 2026 — but aimed at different users. There is no clear winner. Motorola excels in hardware specifications (battery, camera, charging), while Samsung leads in software and ecosystem. The decision depends on your priorities.

    Samsung has been on the market for 9 months and its market prices have dropped significantly — the 256 GB variant costs around 6450 PLN, and the 512 GB from around 7200 PLN. Motorola with cashback comes out to 8499 PLN for 16/512 GB. Samsung is therefore cheaper, but Motorola offers more RAM (16 vs 12 GB), a better battery, a camera with a DXOMARK Gold certification, and a stylus included. Samsung, on the other hand, provides access to Galaxy AI, a lighter design (215 g), and the best software for foldable screens on the market.

    Choose the Motorola Razr Fold if:
    – You care about long battery life (6000 vs 4400 mAh)
    – You take photos and record videos (better telephoto lens, 4K @ 120 fps, DXOMARK Gold)
    – You want a stylus included without extra payment
    – You don’t need the Samsung ecosystem (Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Buds, DeX)

    Choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 if:
    – You use the Samsung ecosystem (watch, headphones, tablet)
    – You care about a lighter and slimmer design (215 g vs 243 g)
    – You value Galaxy AI and advanced multitasking features of One UI
    – You want more memory options (256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB)
    – You are looking for a lower entry threshold (from ~6450 PLN on the market vs 9999 PLN)

    If you compare models with similar memory configurations (512 GB), the Motorola with cashback is 800 PLN cheaper and offers a better battery, camera, and stylus included. Samsung counters with better software, a lighter design, and a wider ecosystem of accessories.

    FAQ

    Which foldable smartphone has a better battery — Razr Fold or Galaxy Z Fold 7?

    The Motorola Razr Fold has a 6000 mAh battery — 36% larger than the 4400 mAh in the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7. This is currently the largest battery in the foldable smartphone segment.

    How much does the Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 cost in Poland?

    The Motorola Razr Fold costs 9999 PLN (8499 PLN with cashback) in the 16/512 GB version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has an RRP starting from 8799 PLN, but is available in stores (Ceneo, Allegro) for around 6450 PLN for the 12/256 GB version.

    Which has a better camera — Motorola Razr Fold or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

    The Motorola Razr Fold with a triple 50 MP camera (Sony LYTIA) has received the DXOMARK Gold 2026 certification (164/175 points). Samsung has a 200 MP sensor with better pixel binning. Motorola wins in telephoto (50 vs 10 MP) and video (4K @ 120 fps).

    Which foldable smartphone is lighter?

    The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 weighs 215 g, while the Motorola Razr Fold weighs 243 g. Samsung is 28 g lighter and 1.2 mm slimmer when folded.

    Do both smartphones come with a stylus?

    The Motorola Razr Fold comes with the Moto Pen Ultra included. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 supports the S Pen, but it must be purchased separately for about 200-350 PLN.

  • The best cases for Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro [2026]

    The best cases for Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro [2026]

    The best case for Galaxy Buds 4 is the Spigen Rugged Armor (85 PLN) – durable, with a matte finish and precise fit for the charging case. If you’re looking for a cheaper option, the Tech-Protect Slim Hook at 39 PLN offers a carabiner and a slim design. All cases in this ranking fit both Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro.

    Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro are among the most interesting true wireless headphones on the market. However, the charging cases are prone to scratches and mechanical damage. In this guide, we compare eight protective cases from Spigen, Ringke, and Tech-Protect.

    We advise what to pay attention to when choosing and which case will work best depending on your needs. Looking for a case for an older model? Check out the case for Galaxy Buds 3 / 3 Pro.

    What to pay attention to when choosing a case for Galaxy Buds 4?

    Before we move on to the ranking, it’s worth knowing what to consider when choosing. A protective case for headphones is a small expense, but a good case for Galaxy Buds 4/4 Pro can protect your headphones from costly repairs.

    Material and type of protection

    Protective cases for Galaxy Buds 4 are made from three main materials. TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) is the most common choice – flexible, shock-absorbing, and scratch-resistant. Silicone provides a better grip and a pleasant texture, but it may attract dust. Polycarbonate (PC) offers rigid protection and a sleek appearance, but it absorbs falls less effectively.

    The best protection is provided by dual-layer cases, combining a soft TPU core with a rigid polycarbonate outer shell. This solution is used, among others, by Spigen in the Lock Fit model.

    Carabiner and Hook

    Many users carry their headphones with them all day. A case with a carabiner or hook allows you to attach the Galaxy Buds 4 to a backpack, belt, or bag. This convenient solution minimizes the risk of losing the charging case.

    Not every carabiner is equally sturdy. Metal hooks (like in Spigen Lock Fit) are more durable than plastic ones, but they add some weight.

    Compatibility with Wireless Charging and MagSafe

    All cases in this ranking allow for Qi wireless charging without removing the cover. It’s worth paying attention to models with a cutout for the LED – this way, you can immediately see the charging status. If you are looking for a wireless charger compatible with Galaxy Buds 4, you can find it in our offer.

    An interesting option is the Ringke Onyx Magnetic with built-in MagSafe magnets. If you use a MagSafe charger or a magnetic mount, the case will provide a stable attachment.

    Fit for Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro

    Both Samsung headphone models – Galaxy Buds 4 and Galaxy Buds 4 Pro – have identical dimensions for the charging case. All protective cases in this ranking fit both versions.

    Ranking – best cases for Galaxy Buds 4 / 4 Pro

    We tested the offer available at homescreen.pl and selected the eight best cases. Here is our ranking – from the best to the cheapest.

    1. Spigen Rugged Armor – durable and stylish (85 PLN)

    Our choice in the category of best protection

    Spigen Rugged Armor is a proven series, known for smartphone cases. The version for Galaxy Buds 4 maintains the same high standard. Made of flexible TPU with a characteristic carbon fiber pattern, it provides solid protection against drops and scratches.

    The case has precise cutouts for the USB-C port and LED indicator. The Matte Black finish does not collect fingerprints. On the back, you’ll find a hook for a carabiner (included). The whole thing weighs just a few grams and does not add unnecessary bulk.

    Advantages:
    – Proven brand with many years of experience
    – Matte finish resistant to fingerprints
    – Carabiner included
    – Compatible with Qi wireless charging

    Disadvantages:
    – Available only in black
    – No version with MagSafe

    2. Spigen Lock Fit – premium with metal carabiner (145 PLN)

    Spigen Lock Fit is the most expensive case in this comparison, but also the most advanced. The two-piece construction made of polycarbonate and TPU provides the highest level of protection. The metal carabiner is exceptionally sturdy and will not accidentally detach.

    The case closes with a snap, eliminating the risk of the earbuds falling out. The matte black finish looks premium and feels good in hand. If you care about maximum protection and don’t mind the higher price – Lock Fit is the best option.

    Advantages:
    – Two-layer construction PC + TPU
    – Metal, sturdy carabiner
    – Snap closure system
    – Best protection in the ranking

    Disadvantages:
    – Highest price (145 PLN)
    – Adds some thickness

    3. Spigen Classic Fit – elegant style (109 PLN)

    Spigen Classic Fit stands out from the competition with its elegant design. The leather-like finish gives the Galaxy Buds 4 a more prestigious look. Underneath, there is a solid TPU layer that protects against impacts.

    This case is perfect if you value style and don’t want your headphones to look like survival gear. Classic Fit pairs well with an elegant set of accessories for Galaxy Watch or a leather smartphone case.

    Advantages:
    – Elegant leather-like finish
    – Solid TPU protection underneath
    – Good grip in hand
    – Carabiner included

    Disadvantages:
    – Higher price than silicone cases
    – Finish may wear over time

    4. Ringke Onyx Magnetic MagSafe – for fans of magnetic charging (59 zł)

    Ringke Onyx Magnetic is a unique case with built-in magnets compatible with MagSafe. If you use a MagSafe charger, magnetic power bank, or car mount – this case will connect perfectly with them.

    Made of flexible TPU with a textured surface. Provides a secure grip and solid protection against scratches. Available in four colors: Black, Sage Green, Constant Coral, and Warm Grey.

    Advantages:
    – Built-in MagSafe magnets
    – Four color variants
    – Textured surface for better grip
    – Good value for money

    Disadvantages:
    – No carabiner included
    – Magnets add a small weight

    5. Ringke Silicone – soft silicone in many colors (55 PLN)

    Ringke Silicone is a classic silicone case with a pleasant-to-touch surface. The silicone provides an excellent grip – the case won’t slip out of your hand or off the table. Available in Black, Light Purple, Pink Sand, and Stone colors.

    The cutouts for the charging port and LED are precise. The case absorbs minor drops well, although it does not offer as advanced protection as Spigen models. It is a solid choice in the mid-price range.

    Advantages:
    – Pleasant, matte texture of silicone
    – Four colors to choose from
    – Excellent grip
    – Precise cutouts

    Disadvantages:
    – Silicone may attract dust and particles
    – No carabiner

    6. Tech-Protect Slim Hook – slim with a hook (39 zł)

    Tech-Protect Slim Hook combines a slim design with a practical hook. The TPU case is thin, lightweight, and does not add unnecessary bulk. The built-in hook allows you to attach the headphones to a bag or belt.

    Available in three colors: Black, Fluffy Blue, and Olive Green. At this price, it’s hard to find a better balance of functionality to price. If you’re looking for a case with a carabiner but don’t want to spend over 80 PLN – Slim Hook is a perfect choice.

    Advantages:
    – Hook/carabiner included
    – Slim design
    – Three color variants
    – Attractive price

    Disadvantages:
    – Plastic hook (less durable than metal)
    – Basic level of protection

    7. Tech-Protect FlexAir – transparent and minimalist (25 PLN)

    Tech-Protect FlexAir is a transparent case made of flexible TPU. Ideal if you want to showcase the original color of the Galaxy Buds 4 charging case while providing basic protection against scratches.

    The transparent case may slightly yellow over time due to UV exposure – this is a natural characteristic of the material. In return, you get a minimalist look and full compatibility with wireless charging for only 25 PLN.

    Advantages:
    – Transparent design – shows the original color of the headphones
    – Very low price
    – Minimalist and lightweight
    – Compatible with Qi charging

    Disadvantages:
    – May yellow over time
    – No carabiner
    – Basic protection

    8. Tech-Protect Silicone Hook – lowest price with hook (19 PLN)

    Best price in the ranking

    Tech-Protect Silicone Hook is the cheapest case in the comparison – and yet it offers a silicone construction with a built-in hook. For 19 PLN, you get protection against scratches, a convenient hook for attachment, and a pleasant silicone texture.

    Available in Black, Navy Blue, Dusty Pink, and Lavender. This is an ideal choice if you are looking for a cheap everyday case or want to have a few colors to switch between.

    Advantages:
    – Lowest price on the market (19 PLN)
    – Hook included
    – Four colors
    – Silicone texture

    Disadvantages:
    – Thinner silicone than in more expensive models
    – Less precise fit

    Comparison of cases for Galaxy Buds 4 – summary table

    CaseMaterialCarabinerMagSafeColorsPrice
    Spigen Rugged ArmorTPU185 zł
    Spigen Lock FitPC + TPU✅ (metal)1145 zł
    Spigen Classic FitTPU + eco-leather1109 zł
    Ringke Onyx MagneticTPU459 zł
    Ringke SiliconeSilicone455 zł
    Tech-Protect Slim HookTPU339 zł
    Tech-Protect FlexAirTPU125 zł
    Tech-Protect Silicone HookSilicone419 zł

    Which case to choose? Recommendations based on needs

    The choice of case depends on your priorities. Here are our recommendations tailored to different scenarios.

    If you care about the best protection – choose Spigen Lock Fit (145 zł). The dual-layer construction and metal carabiner provide the highest level of security. It will be suitable if you travel often or work in demanding conditions. Are you gathering accessories for the new Samsung? Also check out cases for the Galaxy S26 Ultra.

    If you are looking for the best value for moneySpigen Rugged Armor (85 PLN) is the golden mean. Solid protection, a carabiner included, and proven Spigen quality. Our number one in this ranking.

    If you use MagSafe – the only choice is Ringke Onyx Magnetic (59 PLN). Built-in magnets ensure compatibility with MagSafe chargers and accessories.

    If you want a case with a carabiner at a low priceTech-Protect Slim Hook (39 PLN) combines a practical hook with a slim design. For even more savings – Tech-Protect Silicone Hook for 19 PLN.

    If you value style and eleganceSpigen Classic Fit (109 PLN) with a leather-like finish fits a more formal outfit. Meanwhile, Ringke Silicone (55 PLN) offers a nice texture and pastel colors.

    If you want to maintain the original look – the transparent Tech-Protect FlexAir (25 PLN) shows the factory color of the charging case.

    Tip: Regardless of the case you choose, all models in this ranking allow for Qi wireless charging without removing the case. So you don’t have to worry about compatibility with chargers.

    Summary

    The case for Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro is a small investment that will protect your headphones from scratches and drops. Our favorite is Spigen Rugged Armor (85 PLN) – it combines solid protection with an elegant matte finish and a carabiner included.

    If you have a limited budget, Tech-Protect Silicone Hook for 19 PLN offers surprisingly much for its price. And for fans of magnetic charging, the only option with MagSafe is Ringke Onyx Magnetic (59 PLN).

    Check the full offer cases for Galaxy Buds 4 / 4 Pro at homescreen.pl and choose a model suited to your needs. Are you interested in other audio accessories? At homescreen.pl you will also find headphones, speakers, and microphones.

    FAQ

    Does the case for Galaxy Buds 4 also fit Galaxy Buds 4 Pro?

    Yes. Galaxy Buds 4 and Galaxy Buds 4 Pro have identical dimensions of the charging case. All protective cases from this ranking fit both models of Samsung headphones. However, keep in mind that the cases from this ranking do not fit older models. If you have Galaxy Buds 2, Buds Pro, or Buds Live, check cases for older models of Galaxy Buds.

    Can I wirelessly charge Galaxy Buds 4 with the case on?

    Yes, all the cases in our ranking are compatible with Qi wireless charging. You don’t need to remove the case to charge the headphones on the induction charger.

    Which case for Galaxy Buds 4 is the cheapest?

    The cheapest case in our ranking is the Tech-Protect Silicone Hook for 19 PLN. Despite the low price, it offers a silicone construction, a clip for attachment, and four color variants.

    Does the case for Galaxy Buds 4 have a carabiner?

    Not all of them. The following have a carabiner or clip: Spigen Rugged Armor, Spigen Lock Fit, Spigen Classic Fit, Tech-Protect Slim Hook, and Tech-Protect Silicone Hook. The Ringke and Tech-Protect FlexAir models do not have a clip.

    Which case for Galaxy Buds 4 has MagSafe?

    The only case with built-in MagSafe magnets in our offer is the Ringke Onyx Magnetic (59 PLN). It allows you to attach the headphones to chargers and magnetic accessories.

    Is it worth buying a case for Galaxy Buds 4?

    Definitely yes. The charging case for Galaxy Buds 4 is prone to scratches and can crack upon falling. A protective case costing 19-145 PLN is a small expense compared to the price of new headphones or repairs.

  • Samsung Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56 – which one to choose?

    Samsung Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56 – which one to choose?

    Samsung Galaxy A57 vs A56 – the main difference is the more powerful Exynos 1680 processor with AMD Xclipse 550 GPU and Android 16 with One UI 8.5. The display (6.7″ Super AMOLED, 120 Hz), battery (5000 mAh), and cameras (50 Mpix) are identical in both models. The starting price of the Galaxy A57 is about 300 PLN higher.

    The Galaxy A57 is the successor to one of the best-selling mid-range phones of 2025. The Galaxy A56 gained immense popularity due to its solid specifications, attractive price, and long update support. In this comparison of Samsung Galaxy A57 vs A56, we examine both models point by point so you can choose the one that best fits your needs.

    Specifications of Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56 – comparison table

    Before we get into the details, it’s worth looking at a side-by-side comparison of the Galaxy A57 and A56. The table below summarizes the Samsung Galaxy A57 specifications and key technical parameters of both models.

    ParameterSamsung Galaxy A57 5GSamsung Galaxy A56 5G
    Display6.7″ Super AMOLED, FHD+ (1080 × 2340), 120 Hz6.7″ Super AMOLED, FHD+ (1080 × 2340), 120 Hz
    ProcessorExynos 1680 (4 nm), GPU Xclipse 550Exynos 1580 (4 nm)
    RAM8 GB8 GB / 12 GB
    Internal storage128 / 256 GB128 / 256 GB
    Main camera50 Mpix, OIS50 Mpix, f/1.8, OIS, 1/1.56″
    Ultra-wide camera12 Mpix12 Mpix, f/2.2, 123°
    Macro camera5 Mpix5 Mpix, f/2.4
    Front camera12 Mpix, f/2.212 Mpix, f/2.2
    Battery5000 mAh5000 mAh
    Charging45 W wired45 W wired
    SystemAndroid 16, One UI 8.5Android 15, One UI 7
    Dimensions161.5 × 76.9 × 6.9 mm162.2 × 77.5 × 7.4 mm
    Weight192 g198 g
    ProtectionIP67IP67
    Connectivity5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 6.05G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3
    SIMDual SIM + eSIMDual SIM + eSIM
    Price (Europe)from approx. 539 EUR (~2,299 PLN)from approx. 479 EUR (~1,999 PLN)

    The full specifications of both models are available on the GSMArena website.

    Tip: If you mainly care about the camera and RAM capacity, the Galaxy A56 with 12 GB RAM might be a better choice at a lower price.

    Display of Galaxy A57 vs A56 – identical panel

    Both the Galaxy A57 and A56 feature a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution (1080 × 2340 pixels) and a refresh rate of 120 Hz. The peak brightness reaches 1900 nits, ensuring good readability even in bright sunlight.

    Both models are protected by Gorilla Glass Victus+, which effectively safeguards against scratches and minor drops. Samsung did not opt to introduce LTPO technology (dynamic refresh rate change from 1 to 120 Hz), which would help save battery. LTPO remains reserved for the flagship Galaxy S series.

    In the comparison of Galaxy A57 and A56 in terms of display, there are practically no differences. If you liked the screen of the Galaxy A56, you will get exactly the same panel in the A57.

    However, it is worth protecting this great display from day one. Check out durable tempered glass for Galaxy A57 available at homescreen.pl.

    Performance of Galaxy A57 vs A56 – Exynos 1680 vs Exynos 1580

    Here, the Galaxy A57 makes the biggest leap forward. The new Exynos 1680 processor (4 nm) with AMD Xclipse 550 GPU offers a noticeable increase in computing power compared to the Exynos 1580 in the Galaxy A56.

    Benchmarks and real-world performance

    The Exynos 1680 uses CPU cores in a 1+3+4 configuration and a 4 nm lithography, similar to its predecessor. The key change is the Xclipse 550 GPU based on AMD RDNA architecture, which offers ray tracing support. This feature has so far only been available in flagship Exynos 2×00 processors from the Galaxy S series.

    What does this mean in practice?

    • Mobile games run smoother. Titles like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile should maintain more stable frames per second, and ray tracing will add realism in supported games.
    • Applications open faster, and multitasking (switching between several apps at once) is smoother.
    • Photo and video editing – the stronger GPU accelerates rendering and applying filters in apps like Adobe Lightroom or CapCut.
    • Energy efficiency – the new chip is more energy-efficient, which may result in longer battery life despite higher performance.

    The Galaxy A56 with Exynos 1580 still performs well in everyday use. If you don’t play demanding mobile games and mainly use social media, browsers, and messaging apps, the performance difference will not be noticeable. For the average user, both processors offer more power than needed for daily tasks.

    Camera of Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56 – evolution, not revolution

    Both phones have a triple camera setup with a main 50 Mpix sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12 Mpix ultra-wide, and a 5 Mpix macro. The front camera in both cases is 12 Mpix with an f/2.2 aperture.

    Samsung did not change the hardware configuration of the cameras, but the Galaxy A57 benefits from improved image processing thanks to the new processor. The Exynos 1680 supports AI algorithms for night photography, which enhance noise reduction and dynamic range in low light conditions.

    Key differences in photography

    ScenarioGalaxy A57Galaxy A56
    Daytime photosIdentical quality, same 50 Mpix sensorIdentical quality
    Night modeFaster processing, better noise reductionGood, but slower processing
    Video recordingPotentially better stabilization (stronger GPU)Standard OIS stabilization
    SelfiesNo changes, 12 Mpix f/2.2No changes, 12 Mpix f/2.2
    Portrait with bokehBetter background cutting thanks to AIGood background cutting

    In the comparison of Galaxy A57 vs A56, the camera differences will be subtle. The sensors remain the same, so photo quality in good lighting is practically identical. Improvements will mainly be visible in demanding conditions, such as night photography or dynamic video shots.

    Battery and charging – no changes, but with better optimization

    Both smartphones have a 5000 mAh battery and support 45 W fast charging (Super Fast Charge 2.0). The charger is not included in the box, so you will need to purchase it separately.

    The Galaxy A56 charges from 0 to 65% in about 30 minutes, and a full charge takes about 68 minutes. The Galaxy A57 should achieve similar results, but thanks to the more energy-efficient Exynos 1680, the overall battery life on a single charge may be slightly longer.

    Neither model supports wireless charging, which remains the domain of the flagship Galaxy S series. If you’re looking for a fast 45 W charger compatible with both models, check out network chargers with USB Power Delivery in our store. A solid USB-C cable supporting USB PD will also be useful.

    Design and build quality

    The Galaxy A57 is slimmer and lighter than its predecessor:

    Galaxy A57Galaxy A56
    Thickness6.9 mm7.4 mm
    Weight192 g198 g
    Dimensions161.5 × 76.9 mm162.2 × 77.5 mm

    The difference of 0.5 mm in thickness and 6 g in weight may not look impressive on paper, but it is noticeable in hand. The Galaxy A57 feels more comfortable and appears more refined.

    Both models have a flat frame, an IP67 rating (dust and water resistance up to 1 m for 30 minutes), and Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front. The colors of the Galaxy A57 are gray, light blue, lilac, and navy blue, with a slightly different palette than the A56 (graphite, light gray, olive, pink).

    Choose a case that highlights the slim design of the new model. At homescreen.pl, you will find cases for Galaxy A57 from Ringke, 3MK, Tech-Protect, and Bizon, with over 50 models starting from 29 PLN.

    System and updates – Android 16 vs Android 15

    The Galaxy A57 debuts with Android 16 and One UI 8.5, while the Galaxy A56 launched with Android 15 and One UI 7. This is an important difference, as the newer version of the system means:

    • Longer support for updates from the moment of release
    • New AI features integrated with One UI 8.5, including improved Galaxy AI with context recognition
    • Circle to Search 2.0 – enhanced visual search by circling an object on the screen
    • Improved notifications and interface customization
    • Bluetooth 6.0 (vs Bluetooth 5.3 in A56), providing better connection stability with wireless headphones

    The Galaxy A56 will receive an update to Android 16, but it may take a few months from the release of the new system. Samsung provides 4 years of system updates and 5 years of security patches for both models, which according to Samsung’s official update policy is one of the longest support cycles in the mid-range market.

    Galaxy A57 vs A56 – price and value for money

    This is a key question for many buyers. The launch price of the Galaxy A57 in Poland starts at around 2,299 PLN for the 8/128 GB version, while the Galaxy A56 in the same configuration cost around 1,999 PLN at launch. This is a difference of about 300 PLN.

    VariantGalaxy A57 (launch price)Galaxy A56 (current price)
    8/128 GBapprox. 2,299 PLNapprox. 1,599-1,799 PLN
    8/256 GBapprox. 2,599 PLNapprox. 1,799-1,999 PLN

    The Galaxy A56, which has been on the market for over a year, can be purchased at a significantly lower price than at launch. This makes the value for money of the Galaxy A56 really hard to beat. With the saved 500-700 PLN, you can buy a complete set of protective accessories: a case, tempered glass, and a fast charger.

    Which one to choose? Recommendations based on needs

    Choose the Samsung Galaxy A57 if:
    – You care about the latest processor and the highest performance in mobile gaming
    – You want Android 16 and One UI 8.5 from day one
    – You prefer a slimmer and lighter design
    – You don’t mind paying a higher price for the latest solutions

    Stick with the Samsung Galaxy A56 if:
    – You are looking for great value for money
    – You don’t need the latest processor for everyday use
    – You want to save 300-500 PLN and spend it on accessories
    – You prefer a model that has been proven by users, with Samsung Galaxy A56 reviews confirming its reliability (rating 4.6/5)

    Our recommendation: For most users, the Galaxy A56 at its current reduced price is the better choice. The extra cost for the Galaxy A57 makes sense mainly for mobile gamers and those who always want the latest technology.

    Accessories – protection for your new smartphone

    Whether you choose the Galaxy A57 or the Galaxy A56, it’s worth getting protective accessories right away. Both models have a large 6.7″ display that should be protected with tempered glass from day one of use.

    For Samsung Galaxy A57, you will find at homescreen.pl:
    Protective cases from Ringke, 3MK, Tech-Protect, and Bizon (starting from 29 PLN)
    Tempered glass Bizon Glass Clear Duo and Ringke Easy Slide (starting from 35 PLN)
    Camera glasses to protect the camera module
    Protective sets Bizon MatteO Pack and Case Clear Pack (case + glass at an attractive price)

    Check out the full offer: accessories for Samsung Galaxy A57

    For Samsung Galaxy A56, available are:
    Recycled cases Bizon Case ReLeaf in various colors
    Tempered glass 3MK HardGlass Max with full coverage
    Privacy glass Bizon Glass Mule Shadow protecting against peeping
    Matte films Bizon Glass Film Sun reducing glare and fingerprints

    Check out the full offer: films, glasses, and cases for Galaxy A56

    Don’t forget about a power bank for longer trips; the 5000 mAh battery is substantial, but extra energy is always useful.

    Summary

    In the comparison of Samsung Galaxy A57 vs A56, it is clear that the new model is a solid, albeit evolutionary update. The main changes are the more powerful Exynos 1680 processor with AMD Xclipse 550 GPU and ray tracing, a slimmer body (6.9 vs 7.4 mm), a newer Android 16 system with One UI 8.5, and Bluetooth 6.0. The display, battery, camera, and charging remain practically unchanged.

    With a price difference of about 300-700 PLN (considering the reduced price of the Galaxy A56 after a year on the market), the choice depends on your priorities. If performance and the latest system are your priorities, go for the A57. If value for money matters, in the comparison of Galaxy A57 vs Galaxy A56, the older model wins as one of the best mid-range phones on the market.

    FAQ

    What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A57 and Galaxy A56?
    The main differences are the newer Exynos 1680 processor (vs Exynos 1580), Android 16 with One UI 8.5 (vs Android 15), Bluetooth 6.0 (vs 5.3), and a slimmer and lighter design (6.9 vs 7.4 mm thick). The display, battery, charging, and cameras remain the same.

    Is it worth paying extra for the Galaxy A57?
    The extra cost of about 300-500 PLN makes sense if you care about better gaming performance (Xclipse 550 GPU with ray tracing) or want the latest system from day one. For everyday use, the Galaxy A56 is still sufficient.

    What processor does the Samsung Galaxy A57 have?
    The Samsung Galaxy A57 5G is equipped with the Exynos 1680 processor made in 4 nm technology with AMD Xclipse 550 GPU. This chip is noticeably more powerful than the Exynos 1580 in the Galaxy A56, especially in terms of graphics.

    How much does the Samsung Galaxy A57 cost? Price in Poland
    The starting price of the Galaxy A57 is around 2,299 PLN for the 8/128 GB version and around 2,599 PLN for the 8/256 GB version. The Galaxy A56 in the same configuration can be purchased from around 1,599 PLN after discounts.

    Does the Galaxy A57 have a better camera than the A56?
    Both models have identical camera configurations: 50 Mpix (main) + 12 Mpix (ultra-wide) + 5 Mpix (macro) + 12 Mpix (selfie). The Galaxy A57 may offer slightly better night photography due to the improved ISP in the Exynos 1680 processor.

    Do Galaxy A56 cases fit the Galaxy A57?
    No, the Galaxy A57 has different dimensions than the Galaxy A56 (161.5 × 76.9 × 6.9 mm vs 162.2 × 77.5 × 7.4 mm), so the cases are not compatible. Check out dedicated cases for Galaxy A57 at homescreen.pl.

    When is the Samsung Galaxy A57 release date?
    The Samsung Galaxy A57 5G debuts in March 2026. The phone is already available for pre-order with most Polish operators and in electronics stores.